Transcript Highlights:

• senate meetings and we believe that Senator Betancourt's bill strikes the right balance. for faculty sentences
• I think that the areas that we would like to see clarified, at a bare minimum, as of right now.
• So we have a standing that they only have, or have a minimum of two. So everybody gets two.

Bills: SB37, SB1489, SB452, SB724, SB1067, SB1741, SB1273

Keywords: higher education, curriculum review, governing board, faculty council, ombudsman, faculty governance, decision-making, transparency, public meetings, department head, employment approval, public institutions, institutional oversight, education, funding, accountability, state budget, school performance, employment, Texas legislation

Transcript Highlights:

• It also adds a sentencing multiplier for fleeing or attempting to elude. That is the bill.
• It also adds a sentencing multiplier for fleeing or attempting to elude. That is the bill.
• That wrongfully convicted individuals don't get sentenced to death, which would be Florida.
• It says that death sentence shall be executed by electrocution or lethal injection.
• They'll get sentenced to either a life prison sentence or they'll get the death penalty if all these

Summary: The Senate opened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and several recognitions, including remarks from the new Democratic caucus leader, Senator Berman, who emphasized affordability, education, health care, public safety, and opposition to measures he said would roll back child labor protections, book access, and gun safety laws. The chamber also recognized military leaders from U.S. Army Special Operations Command and an intern from Senator Polsky’s office. No committee reports or executive messages were on the desk at the start. The Senate then took up and passed several bills, often after substituting House companions and adopting technical amendments. Among the measures approved were the dangerous dogs bill (the Pam Rock Act), local government land regulation, vessel-related voter freedom/boating provisions, blood clot screening and treatment, fleeing or attempting to elude law enforcement, concealed carry licensing for certain officers and service members, timeshare management firms, disability history and awareness instruction, manufacturing and manufacturing fees, public education on background screening requirements, utility service restrictions, educational opportunities for military children, Medicaid oversight, health facilities authorities, and veterans’ nursing home beds. Several bills were temporarily postponed, including measures on human trafficking, waste management, Bright Futures, Medicaid oversight earlier in the day, mammogram coverage, and others. Debate on the disability history bill was especially extensive, with senators discussing the use of the word “disability,” the role of bias, and whether the bill fit with broader DEI-related policy debates. The bill’s sponsor and supporters framed it as a first step toward helping students understand and respect people with disabilities, and the chamber opened co-sponsorship before substituting the House version. Other bills drew focused questions about local government costs, impact fees, staffing burdens, grant criteria for small manufacturers, and the scope of utility preemption. Most measures passed on strong votes, including several unanimous votes, with the concealed carry/firearms bill passing 33-3 and the local government land regulation bill passing 26-8.

Transcript Highlights:

• that scrier's error changed make those that scrier's error changed >> the<00:10:56.480> sentence
• <00:10:57.120> First<00:10:57.360> page >> The sentence here.
• First page. >> Sentence on the first page. >> Yeah. >> Which one you're talking about here?
• >> First<00:13:17.839> sentence<00:13:18.320> page<00:13:18.639> three >
• ;> First sentence page three >> First sentence page three >> page<00:13:20.399> three

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The commission met to approve the November 21, 2025 minutes, making several clerical corrections before adopting them as amended. The edits included adding the date, correcting a misspelled name, clarifying references to a scholarship fund representative’s title, removing an incorrect “DOE” reference, and fixing a few wording errors. The minutes were approved with one abstention from members who were absent. The bulk of the meeting focused on organizing the commission’s work under SB 57 and identifying which special education cost issues should be prioritized for research and reporting. Members discussed a long list of topics, including student referral rates, why students are classified as other health impaired, increases in referrals since school closures, interventions before referral, costs of non-medically necessary services in IEPs and 504 plans, differences between federal and state requirements, reporting of special education costs, out-of-district and residential placements, dispute resolution, Medicaid and insurance use, graduation rates, and adult learning participation. Several members emphasized the need to combine or narrow topics and to gather better data before the report due July 1, 2026. Representative Ames highlighted HB 742, which would eliminate prorated special education aid payments when state appropriations fall short, and explained that the Education Funding Committee recommended interim study. He argued that local districts are bearing too much of the cost and that the state and federal governments should provide more support. Other members raised concerns about rising special education identification rates, possible overidentification, school climate and mental health factors, bullying, staffing, speech therapy access, and residential placements. One member cautioned that DOE website numbers may be inflated or at least difficult to interpret because of how students are counted. Department of Education staff then explained how special education data and costs are monitored. They said student counts are tied to IEPs and SASIDs in the state system, districts are checked through both desk audits and on-site monitoring, and billed services are compared against IEP requirements. They also described IDEA funding, noting that most DOE special education staffing is federally funded, with a large share of federal money flowing through to local education agencies and the remainder supporting administration, monitoring, and training initiatives. Members discussed whether more staff and more robust oversight would improve accuracy and accountability.

Transcript Highlights:

• Do they like this sentence or not?
• the sentence.
• No, I missed that that sentence. Yeah. No, I missed that that sentence.
• so so we've you can read the sentence so so we've you can read the sentence that<01:20:46.239>
• that sentence as well. that sentence as well. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Yeah.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The meeting focused on reviewing and amending draft minutes and then discussing a draft report on SAU consolidation and school administration efficiency. Members first corrected a disputed statement in the minutes about who starts charter schools, and agreed to mark it as disputed. They also noted a donation figure mentioned in the meeting but not reflected in the notes, and then approved the minutes as amended. The committee then reviewed supporting materials, including a Census Bureau education spending table and a 1993 report on eliminating SAUs. The chair argued New Hampshire ranks very high in administrative spending and used that as evidence for reducing administrative costs. Other members pushed back, noting that education costs are largely borne locally and that the committee should stay focused on its charge. Several members also objected to characterizations of SAU boards and to relying heavily on an old report or on the School District Governance Association’s proposal. The draft report itself drew repeated edits. Members objected to language suggesting the testimony from associations was simply that change was not needed, and proposed more neutral wording about concerns over the impacts of changes. There was also disagreement over a proposed model in which a county-level school administrator would be elected; some members said that would be inappropriate and premature, while others argued the committee had not yet fully developed a consolidation model. The discussion ended with a call from some members for more time and for a future joint legislative committee to continue refining any proposal before legislation is introduced.

Transcript Highlights:

• So in the evaluation, that would be conducted once every two years at minimum.
• Would you, that last sentence you stated about the institutions, what did you say?
• I think it is a minimum requirements. It's funded.
• it properly... ...teacher told us we couldn't say bad words unless we could use it properly in a sentence
• Representative Kyer, together we're asking the author to remove those two sentences.

Summary: The House convened, established a quorum, heard an invocation and pledges, and approved several routine motions, including excuses for absent members, permission for committees to meet while the House was in session, and postponements of some bills. The chamber also received a Senate message listing measures passed by the Senate and adopted a memorial resolution honoring the 21 victims of the Robb Elementary School shooting in Uvalde, with remarks entered into the House Journal after a moment of silence. The House then took up a long third-reading calendar and passed a series of Senate bills on topics including criminal justice and corrections sunset provisions (SB 2405, 2406, 2407), election equipment testing (SB 2166), electric grid reliability and attack-preparedness exercises (SB 2148), firefighter collective bargaining (SB 777), DFPS and foster care procedures (SB 1141 and SB 1398), Medicare durable medical equipment billing (SB 1330), property tax administration (SB 1453), probate cleanup and record transfers (SB 1448 and SB 1839), mental health filing procedures (SB 53), school residency for children in safety placements (SB 226), diabetes-related amputation study (SB 1677), rapid DNA analysis (SB 1723), utility rate transparency and capacity cost recovery (SB 1664 and SB 1856), community supervision eligibility (SB 552 postponed), and other measures. Several bills passed with broad support, while others drew notable opposition and narrower margins, including SB 777, SB 2137, SB 2111, SB 1677, SB 1936, SB 1453, and SB 38. Two bills drew especially extensive debate. SB 2148, dealing with electricity supply chain reliability and tabletop exercises for critical facilities, was discussed as a grid-security measure aimed at coordinating utilities, law enforcement, ERCOT, and the PUC in the event of physical attacks; it passed unanimously. SB 1936, changing how LSD is measured for criminal prosecution from dosage-based to weight-based calculations, prompted extended discussion about lab consistency, carrier mediums, and fairness in charging, with supporters saying it would help crime labs and law enforcement and opponents warning it could distort penalties depending on the medium used; it passed 108-26. The House also passed SB 36, creating a Homeland Security Division within DPS, after questions about overlap with TDEM and the cost of adding personnel. Late in the day, the House debated SB 38 on eviction procedures, with supporters saying it targeted squatters and streamlined removal of unauthorized occupants, and opponents arguing it would make evictions too easy and worsen homelessness; it passed 85-44. The chamber also began debate on SB 37, a major higher-education governance bill that would expand governing-board oversight of curriculum, hiring, and faculty senates; members raised concerns about academic freedom, faculty governance, and the impact on humanities programs, and debate was still underway at the end of the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• We will annually, at a minimum, go out and visit the property, and charitable organizations will still
• <00:32:52.399> go<00:32:52.559> out<00:32:52.720> and will annually at a minimum
• Representative Majority, but trying to distill it into one sentence, you have to make something pretty
• ,<01:39:56.960> you<01:39:57.199> have distill it into one sentence, you have distill
• it into one sentence, you have to<01:39:57.440> make<01:39:57.679> something<01:39:58.000

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This is a good presentation from the Sentencing Commission, and I'd like to take a moment, Mr.
• The Sentencing Commission has kind of, in my opinion, fallen by the wayside.
• President and members, all kinds of new sentencing bills.
• Everybody wants to add years and sentences and expand that. We actually have a thoughtful message.
• And so we have a sentencing commission.

Transcript Highlights:

• The rate of the fee shall be the same as those authorized in 28 U.S.C. section 1821 as the last sentence
• 1821<01:53:50.199> as<01:53:50.320> the<01:53:50.560> last<01:53:50.800> sentence
• by the University System of New Hampshire—there's significant resources that would be needed at a minimum
• by the University System of New Hampshire—there's significant resources that would be needed at a minimum
• I had already served my sentence. I would have to remain incarcerated unless I withdraw.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The House Judiciary Committee opened with a hearing on CACR 7, a proposed constitutional amendment to explicitly state that defendants are innocent until proven guilty in all cases and suits brought by the state. The prime sponsor argued the amendment would strengthen due process, prevent government overreach, and extend the presumption of innocence beyond criminal cases into civil and administrative matters such as forfeiture and family court proceedings. In testimony and questioning, the sponsor cited New Hampshire constitutional provisions, historical examples, and concerns about courts shifting burdens onto individuals. Committee members raised questions about the amendment’s wording, its relationship to existing law, and whether it would have practical effect if current statutes already place the burden on the state. The hearing was then closed without further witnesses. The committee next moved to executive session on House Bill 480, which establishes a procedure for restoring competency and creates a pilot forensic liaison position in Merrimack or Strafford County to assist with that process. After discussion about prior concerns, including an email from the Disabilities Rights Center and whether enough members were present, the committee voted to adopt Amendment 2025-61H and then voted ought to pass as amended. The amendment passed unanimously, and the bill passed on a 10-1 roll call, with Representative Andrew voting no. The chair noted the bill would not go on consent and that no minority report was planned. Finally, the committee opened a hearing on House Bill 666-FN, which would add restitution for violations of library-use confidentiality and expressly include library cards and membership status among confidential records. The sponsor said the bill was intended to strengthen privacy protections after a local dispute and to provide a remedy and deterrent for improper disclosure. Committee questions focused on whether the restitution penalty would apply to accidental disclosures, how the bill interacts with existing exceptions such as court orders or investigations, and whether the language was consistent with current confidentiality law. The hearing remained open at the end of the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• But in fact, that wasn't the whole sentence, and there was some pretty important stuff after that.
• The sentence also reads, unless the effect on the... it said uh while the job Pro provides it said uh
• but in fact that wasn't the sentence but in fact that wasn't the whole<00:10:48.959> sentence
• and there was some pretty whole sentence and there was some pretty important<00:10:51.320> stuff<
• important stuff after that the sentence important stuff after that the sentence also<00:10:54.480

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The minimum age of 12 applies because that is the minimum age for a minor to be charged for the juvenile
• As H. 198 is currently being considered in the other chamber. that is the minimum age for a minor to
• that is the minimum age for a minor to be<00:12:07.160> charged<00:12:07.520> for<00:12
• The general state policy provides a minimum of 2 years for records retention.
• It peaked, but because of the increased cost of rentals, people working on minimum wage and above jobs

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• and then following offenses could be felony and the following offense could be potential longer sentence
• You end up receiving a longer sentence.
• bit out of Currently, the statute requires the victim's name to be included in the petition for sentence
• Currently, the statute requires the victim's name to be included in the petition for sentence adjustment
• is outlined in are the first to sections 3, 4, 6, And this is ensuring victim rates at plea And sentencing

Bills: HF3489, HF3990, HF3825, HF3826, HF3827, HF3822

Keywords: grooming, child protection, student safety, sexual exploitation, educator licensing, teacher discipline, mandatory reporting, mandated reporter training, school misconduct, predatory offender, child abuse, sexual abuse, sex trafficking, child sexual abuse material, child pornography, position of authority, school employee, school administrator, license revocation, license suspension

Transcript Highlights:

• For some crafts, the minimum skilled-and-trained percentage on a job site is 60%.
• For some crafts, the minimum skilled-and-trained percentage on a job site is 60%.
• the home, in the transfer details it did not disclose that there was a violation, you can ask for a minimum
• With prevention in mind, SB 1156 will require a sentencing judge to prohibit a person convicted of multiple

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• . >> [clears throat] >> Um, while most platforms technically require a minimum age of 13, there's no
• estimates are that teens today spend upwards of 4.8 hours per day on social media. technically require minimum
• age uh of technically require minimum age uh of 13,<00:29:36.760> there's<00:29:36.920> no
• Chair, it's in the deceptive trade practices chapter, and I would guess that the subsequent sentence

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• A member of the committee asked that private conversations be kept to a minimum or taken outside.
• The first change from the House-sponsored bill is at the top of page five, in the sentence starting on
• <05:31:16.840> starting<05:31:17.798> on<05:31:18.360> line five the sentence
• starting on line five the sentence starting on line one<05:31:20.240> you<05:31:20.360> can
• beginning at the six it's the sentences beginning at the very<05:32:01.160> end<05:32:01.440>

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• their felony sentence.
• ,<00:15:02.480> KRS Yet, once the inmate is sentenced, KRS Yet, once the inmate is sentenced
• We look toward a felony sentence.
• <00:17:21.679> Um, alternative sentencing participants.
• Um, alternative sentencing participants.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee met with a quorum, approved the October 21 minutes, and then heard a KO presentation focused on county jail funding pressures. KO leaders and county judges said jail costs have become a statewide crisis, noting that county general fund contributions to jail budgets have risen sharply since 2019. They said the organization’s sole legislative priority this session is to “reshape the shared responsibility” for county jails through three main proposals: incentivizing regional jails, clarifying responsibility for pre-trial felony detainees, and changing the model for housing state inmates. On regional jails, KO proposed one-time state construction help for new or expanded regional facilities, allowing former county jails to become 96-hour holdover facilities, changing regional jail authority boards so each participating county jailer can serve, increasing the closed-jail supplement, and offering a one-time payment to counties that close a jail and join a regional plan. On pre-trial felony detainees, Judge Mosley argued counties bear the full cost for people held before trial, sometimes for years, and said counties should be reimbursed for time served credit when those inmates are later sentenced. On state inmates, KO said the current per diem of $35.34 is below the average daily county jail cost of $63.44, and proposed a new contract model requiring the Department of Corrections to pay actual housing costs while counties provide agreed programming such as substance use treatment, cognitive behavioral programming, re-entry services, workforce training, and academic programming. Members asked about the fiscal impact of the package, the feasibility of regional jail population thresholds, and whether the proposal could affect counties’ ability to house federal inmates. KO said regionalization should remain a local decision, that a bill draft and fiscal note were being developed, and that only certain jails are eligible to house federal inmates under existing agreements. Representative Maddox also asked about social media comments by Judge Mosley regarding homeschooling; Mosley said the remarks were unrelated to KO and apologized for any offense. Senator Mills asked what counties would do with savings from jail costs, and judges said the money would likely go to local services such as roads, ambulance service, senior programs, parks, economic development, infrastructure, broadband, and water projects.

Transcript Highlights:

• It also adds a sentencing multiplier for fleeing or attempting to elude. That is the bill.
• That wrongfully convicted individuals don't get sentenced to death, which would be Florida.
• It says that the death sentence shall be executed by electrocution or lethal injection.
• Inmate whose sentence gets to choose. Senator Osgood. Thank you, Mr. President.
• They'll get sentenced to either a life prison sentence or they'll get the death penalty if all these

Summary: The Senate convened with a quorum, opened with prayer, and heard several announcements and recognitions, including remarks from the new Democratic caucus leader, Senator Berman, who emphasized bipartisan work on education, health care, the environment, and family issues. The chamber also recognized military leaders, an intern, and guests connected to later bills. No committee reports or executive messages were on the desk at the start of the session. The Senate then took up a series of bills, many of them with House companion substitutions and technical amendments. Major measures included the Pam Rock Act on dangerous dogs, which passed 36-0; a local government land regulation bill that was amended after questions about quasi-judicial hearings, impact fees, and county costs, then passed 26-8; a vessels/boating bill that incorporated related legislation and passed 35-0; a blood clot screening and treatment bill creating the Emily Adkins Family Protection Act, which passed 36-0; a fleeing or eluding law enforcement bill, amended to remove vehicle impoundment in the House version, which passed 36-0; a concealed carry/firearms bill for certain law enforcement and military personnel, which passed 33-3; and a timeshare management bill, which passed 36-0. The chamber also passed a disability history and awareness instruction bill, the Evan B. Hartzell Act, after extensive debate about language and the meaning of disability versus “unique abilities”; it received 35 co-sponsors and passed 35-0. Other bills passed included manufacturing and related fee legislation, public education on background screening requirements, utility service restrictions, educational opportunities for military children, Medicaid oversight, health facilities authorities, and veteran and spouse nursing home beds, most by unanimous or near-unanimous votes. Several bills were temporarily postponed, including measures on human trafficking, waste management, Bright Futures, mammogram coverage, Parkinson’s disease, and others.

Transcript Highlights:

• The provider would be required, at minimum, to offer tests and licensure preparation programming for
• The provider would be required, at minimum, to offer tests and licensure preparation programming for
• You have one last sentence. Thank you for the time. Thank you, Zora Mclen.
• have<01:49:43.560> one<01:49:44.040> last<01:49:45.040> uh<01:49:45.159> sentence
• that was it have one last uh sentence that was it thank<01:49:46.840> you<01:49:47.280> for

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• . >> And let me just check his testimony too, because he does go into detail in his last sentence in
• Uh, if you're manufacturing child porn, uh, you are at very serious risk of lengthy prison sentences,
• I think federally if you're manufacturing, um, I think you're probably looking at a minimum of 30 years
• 56:29.359> prison very serious risk of lengthy prison very serious risk of lengthy prison sentences
• both uh federally and I'm sentences both uh federally and I'm certain<00:56:33.200> under<00:

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And my final point here is in the statement of intent there's two sentences.
• And my final point here is in the statement of intent there's two sentences.
• > talks<00:32:34.159> about<00:32:34.880> initially<00:32:35.679> uh sentences
• It talks about initially uh sentences.
• And one is that the minimum age of 13 for social media accounts is primarily due to the Children's Online

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The committee first recessed for a subcommittee meeting on HB 313, which concerned an open-meetings-related issue. In the subcommittee, members discussed concerns that the bill might be unnecessary because current law already allows a person to request an open meeting in advance; the subcommittee then voted ITL on HB 313 by voice vote and closed its work session. The full Judiciary Committee then reconvened and took up CACR 6, the proposed constitutional amendment on a “right to compute,” with members debating whether the language was too broad and could create unintended consequences. Supporters framed it as a forward-looking protection for computation resources and strong encryption, while opponents said it was too open-ended and better addressed by future legislation. The committee voted ITL on CACR 6 by a 17-0 roll call. The committee next turned to HB 232, as amended, concerning the rights of conscience for medical professionals. The amendment narrowed the bill to abortion-related objections, removed sterilization and artificial contraception, aligned the abortion definition with existing state law, and reduced damages from treble damages to actual damages. Supporters said the bill would protect conscience rights, give physicians and patients more choice, and could help attract providers to New Hampshire. Opponents argued it was overly broad, unclear in key definitions, and could interfere with employers’ ability to assign staff, especially in rural health settings. Members also raised concerns about the bill’s scope and enforcement, including the broad definition of “participate,” the lack of clarity around exceptions for providers whose services include abortion as a “major part,” emergency determinations, and the inclusion of nursing homes in the definition of health care institution. Some members argued the bill singled out abortion while other controversial medical procedures were not treated similarly, and others criticized the minimum-damages provision as potentially punitive and designed to deter participation. The discussion continued without a final vote shown in the transcript excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• So we're having a new sentence? No, we're just adding to the...
• That sentence says murdered. So, murder. That sentence says murdered.
• Fine with that sentence. Um, so then we could just write after conviction. Okay.
• there's a sentence in there somewhere. there's a sentence in there somewhere.
• Fine with that sentence.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee work session focused on SB 148 and competing amendments dealing with forfeiture and civil recovery in murder cases. Members compared the “Lynn” and “Burge” amendments and narrowed the remaining disputes to two issues: whether the bill should apply only to first-degree murder or also to second-degree murder and related federal offenses, and whether any civil action could be brought before criminal charges or conviction. The group concluded that the pre-conviction approach created serious practical and constitutional problems, including Fifth Amendment concerns and uncertainty over how a civil case would proceed while a criminal investigation was pending. The discussion then shifted toward limiting the bill to post-conviction remedies. Members agreed that the Department of Justice pre-charge stay language should be removed, that the bill should not try to define “victim” in a way that included the person convicted of the murder, and that the definition should be revised to mean the estate of the victim or the victim’s immediate family, excluding the convicted person. They also agreed to delete language about “after right to appeal has been exhausted,” to correct a typo on page one, and to remove a section dealing with pre-conviction probate-style procedures and third-party notice issues. The committee also discussed how to handle third parties such as insurers, publishers, and innocent purchasers. Members concluded that third parties acting in good faith should not be liable if they make payments or transfer property without notice, but if they receive notice they should not disburse funds. They noted that existing post-conviction civil recovery language already allows victims to sue within three years, making the earlier pre-conviction mechanism unnecessary. The meeting ended with the members saying they had reached a deal on the revised language and would bring the updated amendment forward for further processing.