Video & Transcript Research : 'merit evaluation'
Page 87 of 409
ND
North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session
Advanced Nuclear Energy Committee Mar 24th, 2026 at 10:00 am
Advanced Nuclear Energy Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- The security, yes, is regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, so they have to come in and evaluate
- The security, yes, is regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, so they have to come in and evaluate
- that Security, yes, is regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, so they have to come in and evaluate
- I hope it's on the merit.
ND
North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session
Child Custody Review Task Force Feb 23rd, 2026 at 10:00 am
Transcript Highlights:
- I mean, the property and debt side of it, that's fine for your traditional court's evaluation and distribution
- I mean, the property and debt side of it, that's fine for your traditional court's evaluation and distribution
- wanted to make a comment about there was something that was said about how some judges might not evaluate
- So I think it's closely related enough and would be well received enough to merit consideration.
Summary:
The Child Custody Review Task Force met with a quorum, approved the prior meeting minutes, and reviewed a memorandum compiling member suggestions for possible legislation. The memo grouped ideas into topics including creation of a family court, expanded education for parents, attorneys, and judges, expedited hearings for parenting-time violations, limiting law enforcement involvement in custody disputes, creating parenting time expediters, and adopting more uniform court procedures. Members also discussed whether to form subcommittees, but the task force decided to continue working as a full committee rather than create subcommittees at this time.
The committee then heard testimony from Dr. John Perez, a mental health professional, who described his personal custody experience and his professional work with families he believes have been affected by parental alienation. He argued for stronger education, faster court response times, and better tools to address intentional interference with parenting time. Members questioned him about his case history, the concept of parental alienation, and whether specialized family courts or judges with family-law training could help. Dr. Perez said a dedicated family court and faster hearings would likely have helped his situation.
The task force spent substantial time discussing the possible creation of a family court. Judge Hovey supported the idea of a specialized family court or at least a study of one, saying family cases are distinct from ordinary adversarial litigation and that judges with family-law experience could better handle them. Several members agreed that a family court could improve consistency, expertise, and speed, but others cautioned that the task force’s current directive is focused on enforcement of existing orders rather than broader custody policy, and noted that voters had previously rejected equal shared parenting proposals. The group also discussed expedited procedures for parenting-time disputes, with Judge Hovey suggesting a 30-day hearing timeline may be workable.
On education, members generally supported requiring parents to complete a parenting education course and adding educational materials explaining court process, child support, and what judges can and cannot do. Mr. McLean suggested a short instructional video for litigants and more family-law education for judges and attorneys, while Ms. Moldenhauer said education could be incorporated into scheduling orders or mediation orders. Members also discussed the Parents Forever course, including whether it should be mandatory in all counties and whether cost is a barrier; no vote was taken on any of these proposals.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee Apr 24th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- You know, we have spent a lot of time sort of dismantling the merit of roadblocks that we've put up over
- Our training evaluations have consistently shown the positive impact that training can have and how it
- Our training evaluations have consistently shown the positive impact that training can have and how it
- We're still in the process of evaluating them.
Summary:
The committee first heard AB 1157, the Affordable Rent Act, which would lower California’s annual rent cap, remove the single-family home exemption, and eliminate the sunset on existing tenant protections. The author and supporters argued that renters are facing severe affordability pressures, especially in single-family rentals, and that stronger statewide rent stabilization is needed to prevent displacement and homelessness. Opponents, including apartment, building, and property-owner groups, said the bill would discourage housing production, harm small landlords, and override a deal they said was intended to be temporary while the state focused on building more housing.
Public testimony on AB 1157 was extensive, with many renters, tenant advocates, labor groups, and community organizations speaking in support, while many landlords, business groups, and property-owner representatives spoke in opposition. Committee members were split: some praised the bill as a necessary response to the rent crisis, while others warned it could reduce investment and worsen the housing shortage. The committee ultimately voted 7-5 to pass AB 1157 to the Assembly Judiciary Committee.
The committee then approved the consent calendar, including AB 413, AB 1152, and AB 1275, on a 9-0 vote. It also heard ACA 3, which would require the University of California to make available a limited number of down payment loans for eligible long-term support staff who are first-time homebuyers. Supporters said the measure would help lower-wage UC workers afford homeownership and improve retention, while UC and other opponents argued the proposal was duplicative of existing state programs, unnecessary, and potentially harmful to UC finances. The discussion focused on financing mechanics and the relationship to CalHFA, but no final vote on ACA 3 was included in the portion provided.
CO
Colorado 2026 Regular Session
Colorado House 2026 Legislative Day 017 Jan 31st, 2026
Colorado House Floor Meeting
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband and Rural Development - 02/19/25
Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development
Transcript Highlights:
- done now and just voted out to the finance committee, it's really just—we don't have to debate the merits
- c><00:19:08.720>
to significant financial pressures to significant financial pressures to evaluate - their expenses and efficiencies evaluate their expenses and efficiencies certainly<00:19:12.440>
- We are comparing them to themselves so that we can evaluate their financial position and ensure that
- <01:25:31.679>
their 1.16 so that we can evaluate their 1.16 so that we can evaluate their
AR
Transcript Highlights:
- This is due to merit increases being provided to these employees, which will carry them over the max
Summary:
The committee reviewed several personnel and appropriation requests. Item C was a two-for-two position swap with no net increase in authorized positions and was approved. Item D, for South Arkansas College, added three net positions through a mix of growth and swap pool positions, including food service, public safety, housing, and compliance support roles, and was approved. Item E moved positions and $3 million in salary and match appropriation within Workforce Services to consolidate shared services, with no net change in positions, and was approved.
The committee then considered a group of continuation items for FY27, covering previously approved growth and surrender pool positions, various differentials, hard-to-fill and on-call pay, a labor market adjustment for crime lab medical examiners, and continuation of grant-funded classifications tied to ARPA and IIJA grants across several agencies. These items were reviewed together and approved. Reports on the agenda required no action and were simply reviewed.
On the supplemental agenda, the committee suspended the rules and approved OPM’s request for salary increases for 92 employees whose merit raises would place them over their grade maximums. Senator Dotson asked about several public safety medical examiner positions listed on the salary schedule, and staff indicated they were likely crime lab medical examiner roles. The meeting then adjourned.
AR
Transcript Highlights:
- This is due to merit increases being provided to these employees, which will carry them over the max
Summary:
The committee reviewed several personnel and appropriation items, including Item C, which involved a two-for-two position swap with no net increase in authorized positions and was approved after motion. Item D for South Arkansas College added three net positions through a mix of growth and swap pool requests, including food service, public safety, housing support, and compliance-related roles; it was also approved. Item E moved positions and $3 million in salary and match appropriation within Workforce Services to consolidate shared services, with no net change in positions, and was approved.
The committee then took up Items F through O as continuation requests for previously approved or reviewed positions and differentials to carry into FY27. These included growth and surrender pool positions at several agencies, various pay differentials such as second-language, on-call, hard-to-fill, certification, and labor market adjustments, as well as continuation of grant-funded classifications tied to ARPA and IIJA grants and other federal grants. After no questions, the committee approved the continuations in a single motion.
Under the supplemental agenda, the committee suspended the rules and approved Item A-1, which authorized salary increases above grade maximums for 92 employees due to merit increases. A senator asked about several public safety classifications listed as Med 14, 16, 14, and 15, and staff indicated they were likely crime lab medical examiner positions. The meeting then adjourned.
NH
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
FIN Info Briefing - Tue Jan 13, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST
Hawaii House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- thing that we do, to have that periodic review, to look at monies that basically... ...should be evaluated
- allowed us to remain competitive in the legal community and have also allowed us to put into place a merit
- allowed us to remain competitive in the legal community and have also allowed us to put into place a merit
- allowed us to remain competitive in the legal community and have also allowed us to put into place a merit
- allowed us to remain competitive in the legal community and have also allowed us to put into place a merit
CA
Transcript Highlights:
- We're still evaluating last week's amendments. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you.
- the enforcement role, and CDPH, the California Department of Public Health's role is limited to evaluating
- new addictive design features emerge constantly, and California needs a standing expert body to evaluate
- it's a lot to hang your hat on the 11th Circuit's non-precedential stay decision, which is not a merits
- Cost of living is also added to the list of factors that the Office of Administrative Law must evaluate
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Continuing Care Retirement Communities Jun 21st, 2026 at 10:00 am
Transcript Highlights:
- I see merit in that. But it's not either-or.
- I see merit in that. But it's not either or.
Summary:
The commission met to review its draft final report on continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs), with most of the discussion focused on whether recommendations required unanimous consensus and how to handle disagreements in the report. Members agreed that consensus meant no stated opposition, and several participants argued that unresolved issues should still be described in the report rather than omitted. The chairs said the report would include agreed-upon recommendations, note areas without consensus, and preserve written comments or dissent letters submitted by members.
The draft report’s findings and slides were reviewed charge by charge, including CCRC definitions, financial condition, entrance fee refunds, regulatory oversight, advertising practices, and closure/change-of-ownership procedures. Members suggested several factual and wording edits, including clarifying financial data sources, correcting a presenter’s name, refining language about entrance fee use and refund timing, and revising statements about Attorney General authority and CCRC advertising. There was also discussion about the need to distinguish nonprofit and for-profit CCRCs and to better explain how different care levels and licensing structures are described.
On recommendations, the commission kept the proposal to advance the disclosure bill (S. 478) and update the consumer guide, but removed a recommendation for annual open board meetings after objections that it was inadequate. The group spent considerable time debating whether to recommend resident representation on CCRC boards, timely refund requirements for entrance fees, and possible state registration or definition changes for CCRCs, but no consensus was reached on those items. The chairs said the final report would be completed by the statutory August 1 deadline, with final written comments due before then and the report and meeting materials posted on the legislature website.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Floor Session May 8th, 2025
California House Floor Meeting
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- The trial court presiding over an election contest must hold a preliminary hearing on the merits of the
- to trial, my claims were not allowed. are jurisdictionally barred, not due to a lack of evidence or merit
Bills:
HB2242, HB2446, HB2799, HB4502, HB2920, HB2790, HB5620, HB5060, HB5076, HB5080, HB5081, HB5128, HB5130, HB3847, HB5116, HB2969, HB4546, HB4202, HB5624, HB3964, HB4803, HB872, HB4775, HB4777, HB4961, HB5570, HB2988, HB4260, HB1375, HB5009, HB5411, HB5134, HB4388, HB3095, HB1387
Keywords:
constables, civil rights, local government, law enforcement, policy-making authority, affidavit, medical bills, civil actions, reasonable charges, healthcare services, judicial statistics, court performance, family law, civil cases, efficiency reporting, court security, emergency management, harassment penalties, judicial safety, court committee
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Child Committee Meeting - 2025-04-09
Children and Families Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- tired of hearing this: not in the signed agreement which we have negotiated, so regardless of the merits
- This amendment was not in the agreement between Chair Katiza-Witthuhn and I, so regardless of its merits
Bills:
HF2436
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- These claims often lack legal merit, but that doesn't make them inexpensive.
- If we define what a frivolous lawsuit is, it is where there's no merit, meaning they sometimes were not
Bills:
HB 1181, HB3704, HB1363, HB1610, HB1615, HB1620, HB3223, HB1317, HB2884, HB2176, HB4027, HB1664, HB933, HB2613, HB3353, HB2086, HB4101, HB3441, HB4145, HB3455
Keywords:
judiciary, judges, justices, retired, legal assignments, judicial conduct, notary public, criminal offense, education requirements, official documents, record retention, implicit bias, bias training, judicial training, judge education, court personnel, continuing legal education, CLE, state bar, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
WY
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, but again, that's on the merits of the bill.
- Uh but again, that's on on the merits<00:39:31.520>
of <00:39:31.680>the <00:39:31.760>< - I I I do think that merits of the bill.
- How titles are evaluated, and I won't get into that, but that's also briefly or that's also explained
- How titles are evaluated, and I won't get into that, but that's also briefly or that's also explained
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Children and Family Law (01/13/2026)
Children and Family Law
Transcript Highlights:
- No. $40,000 forensic evaluations are often ordered. That's outrageous.
- I'm not trying to opine on the merits of the bill necessarily.
- I'm not trying to opine on<04:25:11.680>
the <04:25:11.840>merits <04:25:12.159>of <04:25:14.080>I on the merits of the bill necessarily. - I on the merits of the bill necessarily.
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Floor Session 5/18/25 - Part 1
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- You should have the merit of that competition. So, uh, I would ask for the support.
- You should have the merit of that competition. So, uh, I would ask for the support.
- You<00:20:52.799>
should <00:20:53.039>have <00:20:53.120>the <00:20:53.360>merit - <00:20:53.760>
of <00:20:54.000>that You should have the merit of that You should have - the merit of that competition.<00:20:55.919>
So, <00:20:56.799>uh, <00:20:56.960>I<
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- But there is a lot of merit for this language, and there's similar language, for example, with the manufactured
- Funding for DEES to take over the oversight of additional ADUs in the shoreland area. ability to evaluate
- ability to evaluate the<04:22:00.399>
environmental <04:22:01.040>impact <04:22:01.359> - So if there was a concern of the town, they certainly could bring it to DEES and let them evaluate the
- The second section is a little bit more complicated, but there's a lot of merit to it, and it's almost
Summary:
The committee heard public testimony on HB 1065, a housing bill that would clarify when multifamily and mixed-use housing may be allowed on commercially zoned land, define infrastructure standards, and preserve municipal discretion over where such development can occur. Prime sponsor Representative David Priest said the bill is intended to help address the housing shortage by using already developed commercial areas without overriding local planning. The New Hampshire Municipal Association, through Brody Dees, said it supports the bill and views it as a priority, but noted it is still discussing related language with stakeholders and wants clearer definitions for multifamily development, infrastructure, and adaptive reuse while preserving local control over commercial land use.
Testimony was mixed. Ivy Van, a certified planner, opposed the bill because she said the infrastructure language is too restrictive and could exclude properties served by private utilities or septic systems. Chris Freeman, a housing provider, was generally supportive but recommended technical changes, arguing the infrastructure definition may be too broad and that the adaptive reuse language could unintentionally block useful building modifications. He said the bill should be clarified so it does not discourage reuse projects.
The committee then moved to discussion of an accessory dwelling unit bill, with Representative Turkot describing changes that would shift some ADU approvals from a matter of right to conditional use or special exception, allow municipalities more control over attached versus detached units, set parking standards tied to single-family dwellings, and adjust size limits. He argued the bill would restore local discretion and prevent ADUs from becoming primarily rental units. Representative Reed pushed back, saying detached ADUs can help meet housing needs and provide opportunities for small landlords, while other members questioned how the bill would affect existing detached structures and breezeways. No votes were taken in the excerpt, and the chair also noted a recess and time limits for later testimony.
AR