Transcript Highlights:

• court of the first circuit judicial court of the first circuit judicial appointee<00:01:24.000><
• Um as she's in her current judicial capacity as uh PDM.
• <00:03:13.760> Um current judicial capacity as uh PDM.
• Um current judicial capacity as uh PDM.
• the first circuit judicial nominee Relle E.<01:09:20.600> Adena.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee hearing covered three judicial confirmations for the First Circuit family court. The first nominee, Maria F. Penn, was introduced for confirmation to a six-year term as a district family court judge. Testimony from family law attorneys and the Hawaii State Bar Association was strongly supportive, emphasizing her courtroom demeanor, preparation, knowledge of family law, respect for litigants and counsel, and ability to manage emotionally difficult family court matters. Judge Penn also spoke about her background, including her legal career, prior service as a PDM family court judge, and her view that family court requires both legal judgment and empathy. The chair noted that the committee would not vote that day and would take up votes the next morning. The second nomination was Wilson Aunga for a district family court judgeship. Supporters described his character, community involvement, and suitability for family court, including testimony from the Honolulu prosecutor, longtime friends, classmates, community members, and others. Speakers highlighted his work with youth, his leadership in the prosecutor’s office, his calm and impartial temperament, and his commitment to education and public service. The chair reported 105 supporters, no opposition, and one comment from the Hawaii State Bar Association. Additional testimony continued from members of the public, including a speaker discussing mental health and personal support for Aunga. Throughout the hearing, the chair enforced a two-minute limit on oral testimony and explained that the committee was short on time and would recess as needed. No votes were taken during the hearing; the chair announced that voting would occur the following day in the same room.

Transcript Highlights:

• And then finally, with respect to the suggestion about BSCC monitoring, while it is true Judicial Council
• And then finally, with respect to the suggestion about BSEC monitoring, while it is true judicial counsel
• locals, they're just better positioned to do this, whereas that's not really a function that the judicial
• So again, we think the nexus is more aligned with the existing performance from the judicial branch.
• Again, Francine Byrne from the Judicial Council.

Summary: The committee heard a broad public safety budget hearing focused on youth justice funding, probation incentive grants, and disaster response and recovery. On the youth justice item, the Office of Youth and Community Restoration described a proposed change to the JJRBG funding formula that would shift resources away from a DJJ-based measure and toward county youth population, serious offenses, and step-down placements in less restrictive programs. Members asked about data on Native American youth; OYCR said statewide data are limited, but its SYTF data show about 1% of youth in secure youth treatment facilities were Native in 2024. The Department of Finance had no objections, and the item was discussed as a way to support alternatives to long-term incarceration. The committee then reviewed the community corrections performance incentive program for county probation departments. The Department of Finance proposed stabilizing the program with a maintenance payment, updating the performance baseline, and adding a growth factor; the LAO agreed the formula needed changes but recommended using 2022-23 data instead of 2021-23, using marginal rather than average cost assumptions, rejecting the growth payment and minimum guarantee, and adding stronger oversight through the BSCC. Finance said it was open to some technical changes but opposed a new BSCC audit framework, noting Judicial Council already surveys probation departments and that evidence-based practice use has increased over time. Members and staff indicated the proposal still needed further work. A major portion of the hearing focused on the January 2025 Southern California wildfires and state disaster response. A resident of Altadena gave emotional testimony about evacuation failures, loss of home, and the need for accountability. LAO and Cal OES outlined the disaster response and recovery system, including mutual aid, alert and warning, debris removal, FEMA and state funding streams, and the long timeline for reimbursement. Cal OES said it had pre-positioned resources, temporarily took over the county’s wireless emergency alert function for about three weeks, coordinated debris removal and recovery operations, and had already allocated more than $286 million in state funds. Officials also discussed the 100% federal cost share for emergency work for 180 days and the uncertainty created by changing federal processes and the cancellation of the BRIC resilience program. The committee also heard two smaller Cal OES items: a request to reappropriate about $22 million for the law enforcement mutual aid reimbursement program, which the LAO said should be placed in statute with clearer goals and reporting, and an update on Victims of Crime Act funding, where Cal OES said federal VOCA allocations have fallen sharply and that roughly $224 million would be needed to maintain current service levels if federal funding does not improve. Public comment included a request for funding to expand datacasting and emergency alert receivers for wildfire and earthquake warning.

Transcript Highlights:

• branch side because they're an oversight agency on the judicial branch.
• Chairman, agency 103, Judicial >> Uh, Mr.
• Attorney Judicial District number one? Attorney Judicial District number one?
• >> Agency 157, District Attorney Judicial >> Agency 157, District Attorney Judicial
• <04:13:29.199> ethics, uh, commission on judicial ethics, uh, commission on judicial ethics

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• branch to the Judicial Council.
• On page nine, you have the Judicial On page nine, you have the Judicial Council<00:36:42.320>
• judicial branch to the judicial council. judicial branch to the judicial council.
• > has The judicial branch currently has The judicial branch currently has contracts<00:37:15.280
• wasn't put in and moved to the judicial wasn't put in and moved to the judicial branch<00:37:36.079

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Committee of Conference on HB 1 and HB 2 met to review revenue estimates and begin working through the HB 1 detail change sheet. New Hampshire Lottery Director Charlie McIntyre reported stronger-than-expected lottery performance, raising the current-year return estimate to $27 million and the next biennium estimate to $200 million, with the increase attributed to improved scratch ticket sales and sports betting not hurting revenue as much as expected. Members questioned the assumptions behind the higher estimates, including the impact of $50 scratch tickets and whether the figures accounted for future conversion from historical horse racing (HHR) machines to video lottery terminals (VLTs). McIntyre and committee members discussed machine counts, per-day revenue assumptions, and the likelihood that VLT conversion would increase revenues over time, though the timing and pace of conversion remained an open question. The committee also discussed several gaming-related policy items in HB 2, including changes to kino hours and local option games of chance, and noted that the Senate and House differed on how gaming revenues would be allocated between charities, education, and general funds. Members emphasized that revenue projections should remain conservative because operators, not the state, would control the pace of machine conversion. Representative Sweeney noted that operators could earn more per machine under the VLT model, and McIntyre said the new facilities and expansions were largely concentrated near the Massachusetts border. The committee then moved to the HB 1 detail change sheet. It agreed to Senate position on the Department of Safety’s road toll bureau and international registration program changes, which were described as a zero-cost realignment of positions, and held the Department of Corrections section for later discussion. On the judicial side, members approved a technical footnote fix, but held a new contract counsel item for involuntary mental health admissions and deferred discussion of the public defender program increase. The committee also noted no change for the PE development authority, moved safety rest area funding from HB 2 into HB 1 with no additional cost, and flagged the tourism development fund and other judicial items as issues that may depend on overall available revenue.

Transcript Highlights:

• The provisions of that is bound by the need for a judicial order or judicially issued subpoena.
• And all we're asking is that DHS provide a judicial warrant.
• And all we're asking is that DHS provide a judicial warrant.
• And all we're asking is that DHS provide a judicial warrant.
• And all we're asking is that DHS provide a judicial warrant.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• going to see when we get to the judicial going to see when we get to the judicial branch<01:38:41.360
• Courts facility reached out to judicial Courts facility reached out to judicial branch<01:39:45.600
• Judicial branch agreed the buildings.
• But so we can put judicial branch on hold.
• So we can put judicial branch on hold.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Committee of Conference on HB 1 and HB 2 was called to order, and Legislative Budget Assistant Michael Kaine reviewed the working documents before the committee. He explained the compare report, the detailed change sheet, the HB 1 index, the HB 2 side-by-side, the surplus statement, and a revenue handout, noting that the committee would vote up or down on all detail-change items and that unresolved items on hold would be removed from the final bills. He also identified staff available to answer technical questions and noted that the committee would track the dollar impact of decisions as it proceeded. Members then turned to the revenue outlook, with discussion focused on the gap between the House and Senate budget positions. House members said their budget guidance was based on revenue estimates that were significantly below the governor’s proposal, and they discussed whether additional revenue could close part of the gap. Department of Revenue Administration Commissioner Lindsey Stepp presented updated revenue estimates based on May data, explaining the methodology and the ranges for fiscal years 2025, 2026, and 2027. She said business taxes were the largest source of uncertainty, with estimates reflecting current economic conditions, recent revenue performance, and a range of possible growth rates. Committee members questioned the assumptions behind the business-tax ranges, including why the low and high scenarios were set at 2% and 8% growth. Stepp said the range was based on historical performance and current economic factors such as inflation, tariffs, and business behavior, and she noted that June is a major estimate-payment month for business taxes. Members also discussed recent revenue trends, including the effect of tariffs and the possibility of federal tax policy changes affecting repatriated profits. The commissioner and House members also discussed other revenue sources, including rooms and meals and real estate transfer taxes, with the House side arguing that lower mortgage rates and home prices could increase real estate transfer revenue. No votes were taken in the portion provided, but the committee discussed possible upward adjustments to House revenue assumptions, including increases of roughly $70 million in total based on the updated outlook and additional insurance-related revenue.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm the lead for the Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Work Group for the Kentucky Judicial
• but I also serve as the lead for the dependency, neglect, and abuse work group for the Kentucky Judicial
• Commission on Mental Health. judicial commission on Mental Health um judicial commission on Mental Health
• 00:03:22.080> for<00:03:22.239> the<00:03:22.360> Kentucky<00:03:22.760> judicial
• group for the Kentucky judicial group for the Kentucky judicial commission<00:03:23.400> on

Keywords: 00:11 Call to Order/Roll Call 01:02 Discussion of 25RS SB 26 07:48 Roll Call Vote on 25RS SB 26 08:43 Discussion of 25RS SB 85 28:04 Roll Call Vote on 25RS SB 85 29:37 Discussion of 25RS HB 805 40:30 Roll Call Vote on 25RS HB 805 41:32 Adjournment, 958, all

Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 26, presented by Senator Brandon Storm, Family Court Judge Marcus Vanover, and Crystal Adams on behalf of the Kentucky Judicial Commission on Mental Health. The bill would ensure Kentucky complies with the ADA by prohibiting disability alone from being used to terminate adoption petitions, parental rights, or child-placement petitions. Testimony cited Kentucky Supreme Court and Court of Appeals cases involving parents with intellectual or developmental disabilities and national data showing high removal rates for parents with psychiatric, intellectual, or physical disabilities. The committee approved the bill 15-0 with favorable expression. The committee then heard Senate Bill 85 from Senator Steve Meredith and State Auditor Allison Ball, which continues the transition of the Office of the Ombudsman from the Cabinet for Health and Family Services to the Auditor’s office. Testimony focused on completing the transfer by clarifying access to the ITWIST database, ensuring complaints go directly to the Ombudsman, adding whistleblower protections, and making the office a separate office within the Auditor’s office for efficiency. Members asked about the prior conflict of interest when the Ombudsman was housed within CHFS, the database access dispute and lawsuit, and whether the office still remained independent. The bill passed with favorable expression after some members voted pass. Finally, the committee considered House Bill 805, with Representative Nick Wilson and Representative Sarah Stalker explaining a committee substitute and amendment. The bill would set timelines for the Cabinet to physically locate children reported at immediate safety risk and require annual kinship-care reporting to be automatically provided to the legislature and posted publicly. Wilson said the bill also cleans up language from last year’s House Bill 271, including changing “threats” to “risks” in the safety-plan definition and other terminology fixes. The committee adopted the substitute and amendment and advanced the bill with favorable expression.

Transcript Highlights:

• SO, THE CLERKS TO PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE IN OUR STATE'S JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
• WE ALSO ARE A KEY PLAYER IN THE COMMERCE BUSINESS WHO ARE TRYING TO SETTLE DISPUTES WITH IN OUR JUDICIAL
• IF THE END RESULT IS A FULLY FUNCTIONAL EFFICIENT AND JUST JUDICIAL SYSTEM THAN THE GOAL SHOULD BE TO
• FOURTH IS IT TO BE DETERMINED DEPENDING UPON HOW YOU ALL DECIDE TO FUND AND THE REQUEST FROM THE JUDICIAL
• THE IDEA IS NOT ABOUT JUST ADDING JUDGES BUT CREATING A FULLY FUNCTIONAL EFFICIENT AND JUST JUDICIAL

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• this team, and it really is a team helping ensure that we are putting the best and the brightest in judicial
• commission that people are not familiar with and have not heard of that is truly the backstop for our judicial
• the last two years, we've ...confirmed 50 judges, including 38 last year alone, two on the Supreme Judicial
• that we put before you to ensure that we have well-respected, well-experienced individuals in our judicial

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The House and then a joint convention of the House and Senate convened with the Pledge of Allegiance, brief recesses, and procedural motions. The Senate transmitted an order to appoint a joint committee to canvass the votes for Executive Councillors, and the order was adopted. The House appointed Mr. Stanley of Waltham, Ms. Howard of Lowell, and Mr. Vieira of Falmouth to that committee. In the joint session, Governor Maura Healey and Lieutenant Governor Kim Driscoll addressed the members and praised the work of the Governor’s Councillors in reviewing judicial nominations and helping ensure access to justice. Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin’s communication was read, transmitting the certified returns of the November 5, 2024 election for councillors. The councillors-elect were then sworn in, with instructions to sign and return their oath paperwork before leaving. After the joint convention adjourned, the House adopted an order to meet again Monday at 11 a.m. It also adopted a special adjournment in memory of former President Jimmy Carter, noting his service in the Georgia legislature, as governor, and as the 39th President of the United States. The House then adjourned to meet Monday next at 11 a.m. in an informal session.

Transcript Highlights:

• AB 839 would provide an expedited judicial review process for a limited number of qualifying SAF projects
• SAF projects to the list of infrastructure projects eligible for expedited judicial review under CEQA
• AB 839 would provide an expedited judicial review process for a limited number of qualifying SAF projects
• These projects require careful judicial scrutiny to ensure they are properly analyzed and mitigated.
• Independent judicial review of these projects is not useless red tape.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, in 1976, when they did the Judicial Reform Act, which then created district courts and the Supreme
• So, in 1976, when they did the Judicial So, in 1976, when they did the Judicial Reform<00:21:48.080
• The Judicial Reform Act of the '70s, I think, was like 18 pages long.
• The Judicial Reform Act of the '70s, I think, was like 18 pages long.
• The Judicial Reform Act of the '70s, I The Judicial Reform Act of the '70s, I think<00:25:48.640>

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:10 Attendance Roll Call: 00:15 SB 133 Discussion: 00:52 SB 133 Vote: 05:01 SB 226 Discussion: 06:10 SB 226 Vote: 09:36 SJR 62 Discussion: 10:22 SJR 62 Vote: 12:55 SB 261 Discussion: 13:42 SB 261 Vote: 18:19 SB 262 Discussion: 19:10 SB 262 Vote: 26:36 Adjournment: 28:02, 958, all

Summary: The Senate State and Local Government Committee met and first considered Senate Bill 133, which would raise audit and reporting thresholds for certain special purpose governmental entities and allow entities with two consecutive clean audits to move to a less frequent audit cycle. Sponsor Matt Nunn said the bill was intended to reduce audit burdens and costs without reducing transparency, and the committee substitute was adopted. The bill passed the committee 8-0 with favorable expression. The committee then took up Senate Bill 226, sponsored by Senator Greg Elkins, which would allow funeral directors to take up to a 15% administrative fee once a pre-need funeral contract is fully funded. Elkins and a representative of the Funeral Directors Association explained that the bill applies to trust-funded pre-need burial contracts and does not affect insurance-funded arrangements. The bill passed 8-0 with favorable expression. Senate Joint Resolution 62 was next, a resolution by Senator Mayden asking the Division of Water to provide clearer guidance to local governments on cleaning out creeks and waterways, especially in light of flooding and debris concerns in Eastern Kentucky. The resolution passed with favorable expression, 8-0. The committee also approved Senate Bill 261, sponsored by President Stivers, which addresses ownership, responsibility, and maintenance authority for swinging bridges in Eastern Kentucky and would allow cities and counties to spend money on their upkeep; the committee substitute was adopted and the bill passed 9-0. Finally, the committee considered Senate Bill 262, also sponsored by President Stivers, which would allow constitutional amendments to be presented on the ballot by question rather than full text. Stivers argued this would make amendments more understandable and noted prior Kentucky constitutional changes had been made by ballot question. One senator explained a no vote, saying the bill did not clearly define who would determine a fair and accurate summary. The bill passed 7-1 with favorable expression and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• A communication from the First Judicial District Court has been received.
• communication was received relating to an election contest from the honorable Judge Tracy Perel, First Judicial
• communication from the First Judicial communication from the First Judicial District<00:06:31.080
• from the honorable Judge Tracy perel from the honorable Judge Tracy perel First<00:06:45.759> Judicial
• District County of Scott First Judicial District County of Scott state<00:06:48.120> of<00:06

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• considering that many of my colleagues routinely voted for highly partisan DOJ officials and even judicial
• She reveres our judicial system.
• Our judicial system has hit a record low in trust by the American people.
• She will fight for this country she loves, its people, and the integrity of that judicial system.
• Our judicial system must be made whole.

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative NDO moves that House File 3893 be recommended and to be referred to the Committee of Judicial
• The motion does prevail and as amended is recommended to be referred to the Committee on Judicial Finance
• <00:22:32.799> finance<00:22:33.520> and to the committee of judicial finance and to
• the committee of judicial finance and civil<00:22:34.159> law.
• finance and civil committee of judicial finance and civil Ah.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, SB 2512 is the judicial certification conforming bill.
• circuits, and eight additional judgeships in the 20th judicial circuit.
• to judges senator Garcia you recognized to explain the bill thank you sir members SB 2512 is the judicial
• additional judgeships in the 20th judicial court.
• The county court judgeships are distributed as follows. 20th judicial court.

Summary: The Senate began with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, then moved into floor consideration of the 2026-2027 budget. Appropriations Chair Hooper presented Senate Bill 2500, describing a $115 billion budget that reduces overall spending from the prior year, maintains reserves, and includes a 3% pay raise for state employees and 5% raises for state law enforcement, firefighters, correctional officers, and park rangers. Committee chairs then outlined major spending in their areas, including K-12 education, higher education, health and human services, criminal and civil justice, transportation/tourism/economic development, and environmental and agricultural programs. Highlights included increased funding for school scholarships and safety, workforce and university programs, Medicaid and child welfare, corrections operations, affordable housing, rural communities, Everglades and water quality projects, and infrastructure. Members then asked detailed questions about several budget items. Senators sought clarification on the Emergency Management Trust Fund, arts and cultural grants, Florida Forever land acquisition versus conservation easements, teacher salaries, charter school capital outlay funding, EASE grants, New College funding, DOC inmate counts and reimbursement, lottery staffing, concealed weapons licensing positions, election security funding, iBudget waiver support, ADAP funding, Medicaid hospital rate reductions, and scholarship and enrollment supplements in K-12 education. Chairs explained that some reductions reflected technical shifts or right-sizing, that some funds were being moved below the line for better tracking, and that several items—such as ADAP and corrections operations—would likely remain conference issues with the House. After questions, the Senate substituted House bills for the budget and implementing measures and adopted amendments placing the Senate language onto the House vehicles to prepare for conference. The chamber passed the budget-related bills and several conforming measures, including bills on retirement, fuel taxes, the state agency law enforcement radio system, court trust funds, judgeships, and K-12 and higher education conforming changes. Votes on the major bills were overwhelmingly unanimous or near-unanimous, and the Senate repeatedly voted to accede to the House’s request for conference on the substituted bills.

Transcript Highlights:

• Curry, again, going to the judicial example,... And Madam Chair, Ms.
• Curry, again, going to the judicial example, that's why they have staff.
• Yes, we're on House Bill 95, additional second judicial district judgeship. Um, yes. Okay, yes.
• And with that, we'll stand for questions. ...which is a judicial district.
• Our judicial system takes too long, and in every instance, I believe it takes too long.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• basically gives the court judicial basically gives the court judicial discretion<00:14:32.639>
• <00:15:42.839> discretion we're not removing judicial discretion we're not removing judicial
• That's judicial discretion then, right?
• That's judicial discretion then, right?
• That's judicial discretion then, right?

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The joint Health and Human Services and Judiciary meeting heard testimony on several measures, with most of the discussion focused on SB 709 and SB 955. On SB 709, relating to mental health data and related appropriations, the Department of Health supported the bill’s intent and said the funding would help maintain a data dashboard and positions, though it had no suggested amount for one blank appropriation. Members also discussed whether sections of the bill were duplicative of existing data reporting. The committees later recommended SB 709 be passed with amendments, including technical changes, deferring the date to December 31, 2050, and blanking out the appropriation for later clarification. SB 955, relating to fitness to proceed, drew mixed testimony. Judiciary opposed portions of the bill, saying some changes could have unintended practical consequences. The Office of the Public Defender supported the bill’s intent but urged keeping a three-member evaluation panel rather than reducing it to two, warning that a two-panel process could create delays if a third evaluator had to be added later. A former Hawaii State Hospital clinician said the bill placed too much blame on the courts and should address institutional and administrative problems at the hospital more directly. The Department of Health supported the intent and said it appreciated efforts to address overcrowding. After discussion about examiner shortages and status hearings, the committees recommended SB 955 be passed with amendments reducing the number of qualified examiners from three to one and making related technical changes. The committee also heard SB 1228, a child welfare services measure creating a working group related to youth legal representation and child welfare reform. DHS requested adding a Child Welfare Services representative to the work group, and multiple advocates, including the National Center for Youth Law and Hawaii Youth Services Network, testified in strong support, emphasizing the need for youth voice and implementation of Malama Ohana recommendations. Members asked whether this working group overlapped with another recently passed working group bill; testimony indicated the two measures addressed different issues. The meeting then recessed and later resumed for decision-making on the 9 o’clock calendar, where SB 709 was adopted with amendments and SB 955 was adopted with amendments.

Transcript Highlights:

• Any legal distinctions based on sex must satisfy the highest level of judicial scrutiny.
• This level of judicial review will make it impossible to uphold many common-sense distinctions in the
• Any legal distinctions based on sex must satisfy the highest level of judicial scrutiny.
• This level of judicial review will make it impossible to uphold many common-sense distinctions in the
• judicial scrutiny this level of judicial judicial scrutiny this level of judicial review<00:08:12.919

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Trust is built by ensuring judicial independence, which is critical to protecting the rule of law.
• Hawaii has a merit-based system of judicial selection and retention.
• I believe this system, which promotes both judicial independence and accountability, is the best one
• has a merit-based system of judicial has a merit-based system of judicial selection<00:36:18.160
• system which promotes both judicial system which promotes both judicial Independence<00:36:22.760

Keywords: House Agenda:, 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• heard uh someone from the judicial heard uh someone from the judicial branch<01:23:35.520> speak
• The common law is an extraction of judicial opinions.
• I also have a out of judicial opinions.
• rights and they get u quasi judicial rights and they get u quasi judicial immunity<03:31:40.720>
• We won't check provides judicial review.

Keywords: 1189, house, all