Video & Transcript : 'financial burden' :

Page 87 of 500
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • A DROP program inherent with this bill will not financially burden the retirement plan.
  • In fact, we have worked with the committee's... ...will not financially burden the retirement plan.
  • from public agencies and litigation by workers and end users, and so these negative outcomes are financial
  • So these negative outcomes are financial risks that eat away at the construction project's investment
  • going to be, you know, a seat at the table making sure that those additional requirements aren't burdening
Summary: The Assembly Committee on Public Employment and Retirement heard two bills. AB 1054 by Assemblymember Gibson would create a Deferred Retirement Option Program for eligible CHP officers and CAL FIRE firefighters, allowing them to work up to five additional years while their retirement benefits accrue in an interest-bearing account. Supporters, including representatives of CHP and CAL FIRE, said the bill would help retain experienced public safety personnel, address staffing strain, and remain cost-neutral to the state. Members generally supported the measure, and the committee passed it 7-0 and referred it to Appropriations. The committee then heard AB 1439 by Assemblymember Garcia, sponsored by the State Building and Construction Trades Council. The bill would require public pension and retirement systems to apply stronger labor standards when investing in California development projects, including prevailing wage, skilled-and-trained workforce, and labor neutrality provisions. Supporters argued that public pension investments should not back projects with wage theft, unsafe conditions, or poor labor practices, and that stronger standards improve project quality and returns. Opponents, including county retirement systems, builders, housing groups, and local government associations, warned the bill could interfere with fiduciary duties, increase costs, create litigation risk, and reduce housing and development activity. Committee members raised concerns about the bill’s scope, definitions, and possible impacts on housing and pension stability, but several said they were willing to give the author a chance to continue working on amendments. The author committed to further revisions and said the bill was still in early stages. The committee approved AB 1439 5-0, with one member not voting, and sent it to Appropriations. The meeting ended with brief farewell remarks for a committee consultant who is leaving for the Senate.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Public Employment and Retirement Committee Jan 14th, 2026

Public Employment and Retirement

Transcript Highlights:
  • A DROP program inherent with this bill will not financially burden the retirement plan.
  • In fact, we have worked with the committee's... ...will not financially burden the retirement plan.
  • These negative outcomes are financial risks that eat away at a construction project's investment return
  • So these negative outcomes are financial risks that eat away at the construction project's investment
  • going to be, you know, a seat at the table making sure that those additional requirements aren't burdening
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • eligibility, and pre-fill applications providing both better knowledge and reducing administrative burden
  • I think it helps to streamline and eliminate the need for our counties to burden the family or the member
  • For example, utility assistance, financial energy assistance...
  • Utility assistance, financial energy assistance—energy providers feel that they're able to address those
  • LIHEAP is the only state program that provides financial assistance to low-income households to help
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session Feb 6th, 2026

Washington Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • We can't keep shifting this burden and make others pay. Senator Fortunato.
  • I mean, financially, it will be paid, but who will pay it?
  • And that's because they can't financially come up with a way to make it work. And, Mr.
  • And without working through their own financial outcomes, it'll be difficult for...
  • So they have some more financial awareness and ability to pay as they recover.
Summary: The Senate opened with routine proceedings, including the roll call, approval of the previous day’s journal, referral of committee reports and gubernatorial appointments, and the removal of Senate Joint Memorial 8003 from the consent calendar to the regular calendar. The chamber also received and referred Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1604 to the Committee on Human Services, and later took up several gubernatorial confirmations. The Senate adopted Senate Resolution 8682 recognizing the YMCA’s 150th anniversary in Washington. Senators spoke in support, describing the YMCA’s role in child care, swim lessons, youth programs, civic engagement, camps, and community health, and guests from YMCA organizations were recognized on the floor. The Senate then confirmed Jeffrey P. Fairchild to the Whatcom Community College Board of Trustees, Randall V. Scott to the Lake Washington Institute of Technology Board of Trustees, and Anna M. Franklin to the Community Colleges of Spokane Board of Trustees, each by unanimous or near-unanimous roll call votes. The chamber also observed a moment of silence for the family of Representative Tom Dent after his wife suffered a stroke. After caucuses, the Senate returned to floor action on two major bills. Substitute Senate Bill 5185, creating a pilot pathway to physician licensure for international medical graduates, was advanced to final passage and approved 39-1. Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5993, lowering the interest rate on medical debt, drew extensive debate about affordability, charity care, and the impact on rural hospitals; amendments were considered, including one to make the bill prospective rather than retroactive, which was adopted, while a rural-hospital differential-rate amendment failed. The bill ultimately passed 29-19. The Senate then adjourned until Monday, February 9, 2026.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Local Government Committee May 18th, 2026

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • And we add extra burden for many different reasons we can come up with...
  • But now, just because of the H.R. 1 excuse, we try to add extra burdens.
  • Add extra burdens.
  • , a state burden.
  • And that's our burden.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Human Services - 03/04/26

Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Common harmful practices include drastic staffing cuts, financial engineering that burdens facilities
  • </c> include drastic staffing cuts, financial include drastic staffing cuts, financial engineering<00
  • with</c> engineering that burdens facilities with engineering that burdens facilities with debt,<00:
  • </c> and minimizing external financial and minimizing external financial interest<01:19:44.960><c> in
  • </c> financial viability of nursing homes. financial viability of nursing homes.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Higher Education - 02/13/25

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • All three of us in college qualify, so we were able to have that financial burden be covered, and we're
  • In terms of higher education, higher education should be an open door, not a financial burden that shuts
  • In terms of higher education, higher education should be an open door, not a financial burden that shuts
  • In terms of higher education, higher education should be an open door, not a financial burden that shuts
  • In terms of higher education, higher education should be an open door, not a financial burden that shuts
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Banking and Insurance Mar 31st, 2025

Banking and Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • If the FFLA's income continues at these rates, the windfall caused by the new rate makes many financial
  • Including bankers, including members of the financial industry, jurists, and lawyers from all parts of
  • This privately funded IOTA system established by the Florida Supreme Court avoids burdening taxpayers
  • entities, upon rulemaking by the Office of Financial Regulation, and that is the bill.
  • I'm a chartered financial analyst, charter holder, economist.
Summary: The committee heard several bills and amendments, beginning with CS/SB 498 on trust fund interest for IOTA accounts. The sponsor said a 2023 Florida Supreme Court rule sharply increased interest paid into legal aid funding, creating a windfall and making participation difficult for banks. An amendment was adopted requiring savings institutions to pay the higher of 0.25% or the highest comparable rate offered on certain non-IOTA accounts, and the bill then passed favorably after testimony from banks, legal aid representatives, and other stakeholders both supporting and opposing the measure. The committee also approved CS/SB 232, which clarifies Florida’s consumer collection law applies only to phone calls during restricted hours and not emails or text messages, after a delete-all amendment and supportive testimony from industry groups. It then approved SB 132, as amended, to designate gold and silver as legal tender and set rules for custody, audits, electronic transfer, and government acceptance of payments; supporters called it a sound-money measure, while the banking association said it still had unresolved technical concerns. Later, the committee passed SB 1466 to create a trust fund for the My Safe Florida Home Program, with an amendment funding it from 20% of collected insurance premium tax revenue. It also considered SB 1206 on transportation network company insurance, reducing coverage during the “dead-leg” period before a rider is picked up from $1 million to lower limits; the bill drew sharp opposition from trial lawyers and support from insurers and some business groups, and the committee adopted a clarifying amendment before reporting the bill favorably. Finally, CS/SB 924 on fertility preservation for cancer patients was amended several times to narrow scope and clarify coverage rules, then passed favorably after debate over cost, preauthorization, and post-treatment storage obligations. The committee adjourned after allowing technical and conforming changes to implement the adopted amendments.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Ways and Means (01/12/2026) (Full Stream)

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um uh one of burden over several years.
  • </c> still be at a financial advantage. still be at a financial advantage.
  • </c><01:17:59.920><c> from</c><01:18:00.400><c> the</c> relieve the burden from the relieve the burden
  • <c> and</c> financial sweat equity, financial and financial sweat equity, financial and sweat<01:41:18.960
  • </c> we must be willing to shift the burden we must be willing to shift the burden off<02:23:12.720><
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Session (03/20/2025)

New Hampshire House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Who will bear that financial burden? Will the individual school districts be responsible?
  • </c><01:44:35.679><c> burden</c><01:44:36.679><c> will</c><01:44:36.920><c> the</c> that financial burden
  • will the that financial burden will the individual<01:44:37.800><c> school</c><01:44:38.199><c> districts
  • <01:45:24.239><c> supports</c><01:45:24.719><c> and</c> Financial supports and Financial supports and
  • </c><05:06:24.600><c> burdens</c> administrative and financial burdens administrative and financial burdens
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 3/20/25

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, and while current law provides some means for the utilities and the commission to ease the burden
  • </c><01:04:35.920><c> on</c> and they can impose serious burdens on and they can impose serious burdens
  • </c> commission to ease the burden commission to ease the burden essentially<01:04:54.480><c> on</c><
  • </c> the same time it protects the financial the same time it protects the financial integrity<01:05:
  • </c><01:07:48.400><c> of</c> and um they can't bear the burden of and um they can't bear the burden of
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • That is an incredible, absurd burden to impose on a family of four.
  • But there are going to be financial constraints on that.
  • I hate to be the burden of that.
  • At the same time, pharmacies are being financially squeezed.
  • So that renewal burden, now I will say 2026 was a high.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • I mean, it's too much burden to be put on a private property owner to do that.
  • Some of them are my constituents and yours, and all of them are rent-burdened.
  • They're being forced to choose between their homes and their financial survival.
  • on children who are at risk of losing their homes to financial struggles.
  • due to the lack of infrastructure resources, undue financial and administrative burden, exceeding a
Summary: The Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government held a long public hearing focused mainly on two sets of issues: proposals to amend or repeal the MBTA Communities Act, and bills to allow local rent stabilization. Committee chairs opened by explaining the hearing would be tightly managed because of the very large number of speakers, with testimony limited to two minutes per person and written testimony still accepted by email. Members and witnesses were called in a mix of in-person and virtual order throughout the hearing. On the MBTA Communities Act, several legislators and local officials argued the law is too rigid and should be revised to account for local conditions. Speakers from small, rural, or infrastructure-limited communities such as Hanson, Halifax, Marshfield, Winthrop, Dracut, Carver, Rehoboth, and others said the law’s one-size-fits-all approach does not fit towns with limited water, sewer, transit access, or buildable land. Some filed bills would repeal the law, exempt certain communities, or create appeals processes based on infrastructure, environmental, or historical constraints. Supporters of the law’s changes emphasized local control and the need to avoid forcing development where communities believe it is impractical or inconsistent with town character. A large portion of the hearing was devoted to rent stabilization legislation, especially S. 1447 and related House bills. Supporters included legislators, city councilors, tenant advocates, labor leaders, housing nonprofits, public health organizations, and residents who described sharp rent increases, displacement, homelessness risk, and the strain on working families, seniors, students, and people with disabilities. They argued local-option rent stabilization would let municipalities cap excessive increases and prevent no-fault evictions while preserving flexibility for local conditions. Opponents, including small landlords and property owners, said rent control would discourage investment, worsen housing quality, burden responsible owners, and drive small landlords out of the market. Some witnesses also supported a Cape Cod/Island transfer fee bill and a suburban infrastructure fund, arguing those would provide local revenue for housing or roads. No votes or formal committee actions were taken during the hearing.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Select Committee on Pension Policy Oct 21st, 2025 at 10:00 am

Select Committee on Pension Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I come from the Department of, or from the Office of Financial Management, where I worked for the last
  • I am the chief financial officer and finance and asset management director for the city of Bellevue.
  • The material that was provided in our packet is the 1973 document that gives the financial history of
  • Concern about whatever you do, let's not create more burden on our state, on our local governments, for
  • burden on our state, on our local governments for greater pension expenses.
Summary: The Select Committee on Pension Policy approved the September minutes and then received a presentation from DRS staff on the FY 2024 CEM benchmarking survey. DRS described its administrative costs, service levels, and technology modernization efforts, noting that its overall service was just below peer averages but had recovered since COVID, and that major projects such as the CorePAM system replacement are a significant driver of costs. Committee members and DRS emphasized that the benchmarking is meant to compare administrative efficiency, not the total cost of benefits, and DRS said the CorePAM project is expected to finish around September 2027. The committee then continued its LEOFF 1 study discussion with staff, the Office of the State Actuary, the Attorney General’s office, Ice Miller, and the State Investment Board. The discussion focused on two legislative approaches: a merger of LEOFF 1, PERS 1, and TRS 1 into a Legacy Plan (5085) and a terminate-and-restate approach for LEOFF 1 (2034). Testimony explained that both approaches could satisfy federal tax requirements if the IRS issues a favorable determination letter and private letter ruling after enactment, and that the merger is viewed as the more conservative option. Witnesses said the exclusive benefit rule prevents surplus assets from being used for non-benefit purposes, but allows them to support benefits and reasonable administrative costs for plan members and beneficiaries. Questions from members centered on whether the IRS would require plan funding above 100 percent, how overfunding could be managed, the effect of prior legislation such as ESSB 5357, and the costs and timing of IRS filings; staff and counsel said the IRS process can take a year or more and recommended waiting for approval before implementation. The committee also adopted preliminary 2026 meeting dates. During public comment, several speakers supported the merger bill because it would permanently eliminate the current LEOFF 1 employer surcharge and provide a permanent COLA for retirees, while others urged caution about creating additional pension burdens for state and local governments. One commenter asked the committee to study climate change as a systemic risk to pension investments, and another requested an ad hoc COLA for Plan 1 retirees in 2026. The meeting ended with no action on the LEOFF 1 study beyond discussion and with the meeting calendar approved.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Data centers are repositories of vast amounts of information, such as financial data, personal information
  • One of them is what Assembly Member Burr mentioned earlier about the burden being on the applicant to
  • So that should alleviate burden on staff to be writing that document themselves or retaining their own
  • We can immediately ease the financial burden on Californians while continuing to lead the nation in clean
  • We can immediately ease the financial burden on Californians while continuing to lead the nation in clean
Summary: The Assembly Committee on Utilities and Energy heard several bills focused on grid reliability, affordability, clean energy infrastructure, and industrial decarbonization. AB 222, by Assemblymember Bauer-Kahan, would require more data reporting on data centers and aim to prevent ratepayers from bearing related grid costs; supporters said better information is needed to plan for rapidly growing electricity demand from AI and data centers, while opponents warned about privacy, security, trade-secret, and cost-shifting concerns. The bill passed the committee on a 13-4 vote, with the roll left open for absent members. AB 941, by Assemblymember Bonta, would impose a 270-day timeline for CPUC review of priority transmission projects to speed clean-energy infrastructure buildout. Supporters argued that transmission delays are slowing California’s climate goals and raising costs, while opponents raised concerns about CEQA process, staffing, and prioritization. The bill passed 15-0. AB 1191, by Assemblymember Tangipa, would make existing large hydroelectric facilities eligible for the Renewable Portfolio Standard; supporters framed it as a way to lower rates and ease affordability pressures, while opponents said it would undermine the purpose of the RPS by substituting existing resources for new renewable development. That bill failed on a 4-11 vote. AB 1280, by Assemblymember Garcia, would expand state grant programs to support thermal energy storage projects for industrial decarbonization. Supporters said it would help modernize manufacturing, cut pollution in disadvantaged communities, and preserve jobs, with broad support from environmental and clean manufacturing groups and no opposition testimony. The bill passed 17-0. AB 1117, by Assemblymember Schultz, would require the CPUC to offer optional dynamic electricity rate tariffs for customers to shift usage away from peak periods; supporters said it could lower bills and improve grid efficiency, while utilities said they were not opposed to the concept but wanted more flexibility and time in the regulatory process. That bill passed 14-0. The committee also approved its consent calendar and other noncontroversial items, with several measures moving forward unanimously.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Local Government Committee Apr 22nd, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • And Dean Grafillo, with Renew Financial.
  • Chair, Senators, Dean Grafiel with Capital Advocacy, here on behalf of Renew Financial.
  • And then some people it put them into financial ruin. I got to experience the sales part of it.
  • They burden local water and sewage systems, They burden local water and sewage systems, leading to harmful
  • And we understand that the costs can be a burden at times.
Summary: The committee heard several bills focused on wildfire resilience, land use, and local government authority. SB 911 would require notification to fire agencies when a home in a high fire severity zone is sold under an agreement to complete defensible space compliance; the California Association of Realtors said it would drop opposition if the bill is amended to use the preliminary change of ownership report, and the bill passed 4-0 to Appropriations. SB 994 would bar local officials from entering nondisclosure agreements that prevent them from sharing information with the elected decision makers of their jurisdiction; supporters framed it as a transparency measure, and it passed 4-0 as amended. The consent calendar, including SB 958 and several other bills, was also adopted 4-0. The committee then took up SB 1041, which would expand PACE financing for wildfire home-hardening improvements statewide and add consumer protections, hardship provisions, and reporting requirements. Supporters, including Renew Financial and Cal Fire Local 2881, argued it would help homeowners finance fire-resistant roofs, vents, and other upgrades. Opponents, including homeowner advocates, county tax collectors, mortgage lenders, and consumer groups, warned that PACE has a history of contractor abuse, high costs, liens that survive bankruptcy, and risks to vulnerable homeowners. After extended debate, the bill advanced 3-2 to Appropriations and remained on call. SB 1075 would require local governments in AB 617 communities to consider air-quality impacts and community emissions reduction plans when approving certain commercial and industrial projects. Environmental justice supporters said the bill would help implement long-promised pollution reductions in heavily burdened communities, while business, local government, planning, and industry groups argued it duplicated CEQA and existing permitting processes, created litigation risk, and could deter investment and jobs. The bill passed 3-2 and remained on call. SB 958, relating to the Midway Rising redevelopment project in San Diego, was presented as a path for a long-planned housing and entertainment project with at least 4,250 homes, including 2,000 affordable units, and it passed 3-0 to Appropriations. Finally, SB 1182 would require local governments to consider insurance availability in safety planning for development in high fire hazard areas. The author said the bill responds to rising insurance costs and the Fair Plan’s growth, while supporters said it would better align land-use decisions with wildfire risk. Opponents and some committee members argued the bill was too vague, could burden cities, and would not solve the underlying insurance market problem. The discussion was ongoing when the transcript ended.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee Apr 23rd, 2025

Utilities and Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • This measure also requires that the commission promptly deliver financial benefits of these financing
  • I just didn't like the burden changes in the bill.
  • The burden should not be on the customer.
  • The burden should not be on the customer if they would like to they would like to receive updates.
  • The burden should not be on the customer.
Summary: The committee heard several energy and utility bills. AB 1016, by Assembly Member Gonzales, would let certain counties with geothermal elements locally permit geothermal plants up to 150 megawatts through a five-year pilot program. Imperial County and other supporters said the bill would speed clean energy development, create jobs, and bring major tax revenue, while labor groups opposed it unless amended to preserve skilled-and-trained workforce standards. The author committed to continue working with labor, and the bill passed 10-0 to Natural Resources with the commitment to take amendments there. AB 1020, by Assembly Member Schiavo, would require investor-owned utilities to disclose taxpayer-funded loans and grants to the Public Utilities Commission and ensure the benefits are passed through to ratepayers. TURN supported the bill as a way to prevent utilities from “double dipping,” while PG&E said it already provides transparency and the bill was unnecessary. Wildfire survivors opposed it unless amended to direct any non-ratepayer funds first to victims. The bill passed 8-1 to Appropriations, with some members raising questions about the treatment of grants, loans, and ratepayer benefits. AB 881, by Assembly Member Wicks, would establish state safety standards for carbon dioxide pipelines to allow carbon capture and sequestration projects to move forward despite delays in federal rulemaking. Supporters, including SMUD and the Carbon Solutions Coalition, said the bill is needed to meet climate goals and access federal funding; environmental justice groups and local residents urged stronger protections and amendments. The bill passed 11-0 to Natural Resources with the commitment to take amendments there. AB 1156, by Assembly Member Wicks, would update the solar use easement program to allow solar development on water-constrained agricultural land; rural counties and farm groups remained opposed but said amendments moved the bill in the right direction. It passed 17-0 to Agriculture. AB 1222, by Assembly Member Bauer-Kahan, would bar utilities from recovering the costs of challenging CPUC decisions from ratepayers and give greater weight to ALJ proposed decisions; utilities opposed it, citing delay and fairness concerns, while supporters said it would protect ratepayers. It passed 10-3 to Judiciary. The committee also began hearing AB 1260, by Assembly Member Ward, on community renewable energy, with supporters arguing it would improve access for renters and low-income households and correct the CPUC’s implementation of prior law.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Standing Committee on Local Government (3-24-26)

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Kentucky's 408 cities vary widely in size, staffing capacity, and financial complexity.
  • </c> staffing capacity and financial staffing capacity and financial complexity.<00:04:12.160><c> Yet
  • He and I were talking after she and I got done, and he was talking about the audit burdens that they
  • She was talking about the same thing, about the audit burdens they had.
  • </c><00:22:18.960><c> I</c> about the audit burdens they had. I about the audit burdens they had.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We're going to make sure that the developer provides a surety bond or or some type of other financial
  • This bill increases the financial viability of the condominium projects by reducing financing costs.
  • Surety bonds are one of the most serious and secure instruments in our financial system.
  • It's oftentimes financially burdensome.
  • burdens on property homeowners, I believe that we should, and this bill does effectively empower law
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Local Government Jan 20th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so housing, to put this artificial burden on, increases the cost of housing, which I think with the
  • We couldn’t have done that just financially.”
  • We will also be burdened with the debt of the Columbia Generating Station through 2044.
  • Four of them failed for financial reasons.
  • This bill does put the burden of failure on us, the taxpayer.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several local government bills. HB 2006 would extend the deadline for certain rural counties that collect a sales and use tax for economic development to designate industrial land banks under the Growth Management Act. Supporters, including the sponsor and Kittitas County representatives, said the bill would help counties identify industrial land for job growth and economic development; Futurewise opposed it, citing concerns about large industrial land banks and impacts to agricultural lands. HB 2244 would let a city that forms a fire protection district after July 1, 2026, keep its levy rate without reducing it by the district’s levy, and would also allow online notice and interlocal contracting for fire services. City and fire officials supported it as a practical tool to fund fire service, while one witness opposed the broader trend of appointed taxing authorities. The committee also heard extensive testimony on HB 2316, which would limit shrub-step vegetation inside urban growth areas from being treated as wildlife habitat, critical area, or conservation area, and would bar related mitigation or replacement requirements. Tri-Cities officials, builders, housing advocates, and the sponsor argued the bill would reduce delays and costs for housing and development on already designated urban land, while conservation groups, tribal representatives, and some individuals opposed it as a broad rollback of habitat protections and a harmful precedent for ecosystems and wildlife. No vote was taken on the bills during the hearing. HB 2103 would expand public utility contracting authority so cities, utilities, and joint operating agencies could enter “capability” contracts for renewable or non-emitting generation projects, including nuclear, renewable hydrogen, and fusion, and repeal certain price-limit restrictions. Supporters said it would align older contracting law with the Clean Energy Transformation Act and help utilities plan for future power needs; opponents warned it would shift risk to ratepayers and revive concerns tied to the WPPSS nuclear debacle. The committee also heard HB 2388, which would classify pivot-corner solar and agrovoltaic facilities on agricultural land as distributed energy resources and accessory uses; the sponsor and supporters said it would help meet energy needs without harming productive farmland, while Futurewise asked for clarification to avoid unintended loss of agricultural land. The hearing then returned to HB 2103 for additional testimony, with the same basic split between utility and clean-energy supporters and ratepayer or anti-nuclear opponents.