Transcript Highlights:

• <c> progress</c> legislature made significant progress legislature made significant progress last<00:
• In the 2025 legislature authorizations.
• And when something by the legislature.
• The legislature needs to appropriate it.
• </c><00:31:54.480><c> have</c> years, the governor and legislature have years, the governor and legislature

Summary: Minnesota Management and Budget Commissioner Aaron Campbell, State Economist Dr. Tony Becker, and State Budget Director Anna Mingi presented the November 2025 budget and economic forecast. Campbell said the state now projects a nearly $2.5 billion surplus at the end of the 2026-27 biennium, about $575 million better than the end-of-session estimate, but also a projected negative balance of about $2.9 billion in FY 2028-29, reflecting a worsening structural imbalance. He said the budget reserve stands at $3.4 billion, with cash flow and budget reserves totaling $3.8 billion after a $244 million addition, and emphasized that Minnesota’s AAA bond rating and reserve policy remain strengths even as future sessions will need to address the long-term gap. Becker said the national economic outlook has changed only modestly since February, but growth remains below trend through the forecast horizon. He cited slower consumer spending, weak private investment, continued tariff uncertainty, lower projected immigration, and modest inflation that stays near 3% through 2026 before easing. Revenue forecasts for the next biennium were revised up to $66.3 billion, driven mainly by higher individual income tax receipts and other revenue, partly offset by lower sales and corporate tax forecasts. He also noted risks from federal policy changes, the recent shutdown’s effect on data availability, and possible equity market volatility. Mingi said general fund spending is projected to rise sharply, with current biennium spending up $3.4 billion from end-of-session estimates and planning-year spending up $1.9 billion. She attributed much of the increase to carryforward from prior one-time appropriations, discretionary inflation, and especially Medical Assistance. MA costs are projected to be about $2.5 billion higher over 2025-29, largely because managed care rates rose more than expected due to higher utilization and higher-cost services, including pharmacy costs, while long-term care and disability waiver costs also increased. In response to questions, officials said the federal reconciliation bill had only a relatively small effect on the health care changes, and that the carryforward amounts reflect unspent prior appropriations that now show up in later years rather than new spending.

Transcript Highlights:

• My last job when I worked for the legislature was Appropriation Staff Director.
• In 2007 and 2008, a legislature, much like the legislature at that time, was facing the situation much
• In 2007 and 2008, a legislature, much like the legislature, the legislature, that, 2008, a legislature
• legislature would have to determine.
• . estimate each one, and then give those numbers to the legislature, and the legislature makes an appropriation

Summary: The Select Committee on Property Taxes met for an educational session focused on how Florida funds public schools and how property taxes are assessed and levied. Dr. Jim Zengali of the Department of Revenue explained the FEFP school funding formula, noting that it is built on weighted student counts, a base student allocation, and programmatic add-ons such as transportation, exceptional student education, school safety, and mental health. He said school funding is roughly split between state general revenue and local property taxes through required local effort, with additional discretionary and capital outlay millages contributing to total school funding. He also described the Department of Revenue’s role in certifying property rolls at fair market value and reviewing them for substantial compliance, including the so-called “nuclear option” if a roll is not approved. Members asked about trends in millage rates, county-by-county funding differences, the effect of growth and enrollment changes, and how property appraisals are reviewed. Zengali said aggregate millage for school funding has declined over the last decade while revenues have still increased, and he agreed to provide additional data on county trends, parcel strata, student growth, and enrollment impacts. He also clarified that school funding is equalized so students receive similar resources regardless of county wealth, and that federal funding plays only a small role in the FEFP. Amy Baker of the Joint Legislative Office of Economic and Demographic Research then discussed existing homestead benefits. She said about half of Florida’s parcels are homestead properties, most fall in the $250,000 to $500,000 value range, and many seniors without mortgages pay property taxes in lump sums rather than through escrow. Baker explained that Florida’s homestead tax burden is middle-of-the-pack nationally and that the main benefits are Save Our Homes and portability on the differential side, plus the $25,000 homestead exemption and related exemptions on the exemption side. She said these benefits reduce taxable value substantially, with homestead properties receiving a large share of the reductions, and noted that the committee requested follow-up data on exemption usage, portability timing, senior exemptions, and county-level patterns. The final presentation, by Lizette Kelly of the Department of Revenue, covered millage rates and the TRIM process. She reviewed the history of truth-in-millage notices, required taxpayer mailings, public hearing notices, and later changes that tied local millage resets to rollback and majority-vote rates. Kelly explained the difference between proposed and adopted millage, the rollback rate, and the majority-vote rate, and described how taxing authorities include counties, cities, special districts, and MSTUs. She also outlined how county taxable value is calculated from just value through assessment differentials and exemptions, and how certain exemptions, such as the additional senior exemption, apply only to the taxing authority that adopted them. No votes were taken during the meeting, but members requested several follow-up data reports for later discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• If the legislature decides to take this route, then we think that more explicit benchmarks or goals for
• if the legislature thinks that you know increasing you know the market share and the number of jobs
• Seriously, in 2023, after the governor, the legislature, and stakeholders and television tax credit,
• In terms of what the CFC is doing, we had a very robust conversation with the legislature for program
• There is nobody in the state legislature, not Mr. Zuber, not myself, not Ms. McKenna, not Mr.

Transcript Highlights:

• The legislature would still have to make a decision to do that.
• The legislature would still have to make a decision to do that.
• The legislature would make a decision on that.
• The good news is Larry Barker will be doing less and less stories about the legislature.
• From the legislature.

Bills: SB190 , HB247 , HB8

Committee: Senate Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:

• I think that's the spirit of this committee, and it's the spirit, I believe, of the legislature.
• I think that's the spirit of this committee, and it's the spirit, I believe, of the legislature.
• I think that's the spirit of this committee, and it's the spirit, I believe, of the legislature.
• Any other members of the legislature?
• We want to make sure that the power of the legislature is not eliminated by regulations.

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight

Summary: The committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight held a hybrid hearing covering public construction, business regulations, and honorary designations, with most of the discussion focused on two matters: a five-year moratorium on new jail and prison construction (S. 2114/H. 3422) and a bill designating June 7 as Tourette Syndrome Awareness Day (S. 2152/H. 3305). The chair emphasized that the hearing was public, testimony would be recorded, and speakers should generally keep remarks to three minutes. Senator Comerford introduced the prison moratorium bill, saying it would pause new construction while allowing renovations, and Senator Friedman introduced the Tourette awareness bill and a separate Tuskegee Airmen commemoration measure, asking for favorable action on both honorary designations. A large portion of the hearing featured remote testimony from incarcerated people at MCI Framingham and MCI Shirley in support of the prison moratorium. Witnesses repeatedly argued that Massachusetts does not need a new women’s prison, that the incarcerated population is declining, and that funds would be better spent on mental health care, addiction treatment, vocational training, pre-release programming, housing, and repairs to existing facilities. Several speakers described poor conditions, limited programming, and the need to address trauma, domestic violence, and substance use as root causes of incarceration. One committee member responded to testimony by noting that incarceration numbers are going down, that the state is working on housing and workforce opportunities for people returning home, and that the committee wants to expand pathways to employment and reentry. The Tourette Syndrome Awareness Day bill drew testimony from the bill’s young sponsor, Owen Rosenthal, his parents, medical professionals, and advocates. They described Tourette syndrome as a misunderstood neurodevelopmental condition, said awareness would reduce stigma and improve diagnosis and support, and cited the need for education in schools, workplaces, and the medical community. The Tourette Association of America supported the bill, noting underdiagnosis, co-occurring conditions, pain, and mental health risks associated with Tourette syndrome. Committee members praised the youth advocates and asked that written testimony be submitted electronically. The hearing ended without any recorded votes or final committee action in the transcript provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• The legislature and the administration working together in the Mass Leads Act a few years ago.
• And again, through the legislature, we're... Top 10, we've done it.
• And again, through the legislature, we've grown sectors and we've made the strategic investments.
• We are asking the legislature to include a local option real estate transfer fee amendment.
• We are simply asking the legislature to provide us with another tool.

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies

Summary: The committee held a hearing on Governor Healey’s economic development proposal, H. 5386, also referred to as the Mass Winds Act, focused on global investment, talent, innovation, housing, and business competitiveness. Governor Healey, Secretary of Economic Development Eric Paley, and Secretary of Administration and Finance Matt Gorzkowicz described the bill as a response to federal uncertainty and global competition, building on the 2024 Mass Leads Act. They highlighted proposed investments in a Global Mass initiative, including a $50 million innovation access fund and $20 million for sites to help international companies locate or expand in Massachusetts, along with support for AI, quantum, robotics, defense innovation, climate tech, downtown revitalization, and creative/cultural economy projects. They also emphasized measures to lower business costs, including reducing the LLC filing fee, expanding the small business energy tax exemption, and streamlining housing and development rules. Committee members questioned the administration about non-compete reform, AI and data-center infrastructure, housing affordability, and whether the bill would help retain workers and companies in Massachusetts. The governor and secretaries argued that the non-compete changes would restore the original compromise by requiring any alternative to garden leave to be negotiated at separation, and they said the bill’s housing and workforce provisions are intended to help young workers stay in the state. They also said Massachusetts is already investing in AI training, an AI hub, and energy-related planning, while acknowledging that data-center growth will require careful attention to water, electricity, and ratepayer impacts. Several witnesses testified on specific sections. Northeastern University supported the internship tax credit, saying experiential learning helps students gain jobs and remain in Massachusetts. The Latino Empowerment Advisory Council supported the waiver of redundant English testing for internationally trained nurses, saying it would speed entry into the workforce without lowering clinical standards. Russell Beck opposed the non-compete changes, arguing they would undermine the 2018 compromise and could reduce other forms of employee compensation. The Secretary of the Commonwealth’s office opposed the LLC fee reduction, citing revenue loss and fraud concerns. Municipal and regional groups, including the MMA and the Metro Mayors Coalition, supported site plan review codification and downtown/arts investments, while urging continued municipal input. The AFL-CIO asked for trigger language to preserve labor protections if federal law changes, and business and industry witnesses generally supported the bill’s competitiveness and global investment provisions. No votes were taken; the hearing was informational, with written testimony invited after the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• And again, through the legislature, we've Top 10, we've done it.
• And again, through the legislature, we've grown sectors and we've made the strategic investments.
• They were able to leverage the nine and a half million dollars that you and the legislature put in in
• We are asking the legislature to include a local option real estate transfer fee amendment.
• We are simply asking the legislature to provide us with another tool.

Bills: H5386

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies

Transcript Highlights:

• We also recommend the Legislature consider funding technical assistance for community schools over a
• Thank you. ...and the Legislature consider funding technical assistance for community schools over a
• The legislature, with the administration, has really designed and launched a powerful approach.
• The legislature should require, as a condition to receive these funds, schools to attest to The legislature
• So I just want to urge the Legislature to reconsider their exclusion of our school.

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Education Finance held a hearing on the Governor’s proposal to convert the California Community Schools Partnership Program from a one-time grant model into an ongoing $1 billion Proposition 98 program. Finance and CDE described the expansion as a way to sustain existing community schools and add thousands more, with county offices, regional/state technical assistance centers, annual self-certification, and a future accreditation process intended to support fidelity to the state framework. The LAO opposed shifting to an ongoing categorical program and recommended continuing one-time grants, while suggesting longer-term funding for technical assistance and, if ongoing funding is adopted, stronger planning, reporting, phased expansion, and clearer accreditation timelines. Committee members pressed the administration on how the new proposal could fund far more schools with less money than the original $4.1 billion program, how much of the funding would go to existing cohorts versus new schools, and whether the proposal sufficiently requires planning and implementation before funds are received. Testimony from practitioners and advocates largely supported ongoing funding but emphasized that money alone is not enough. Speakers from LPI, CTA, San Diego Unified, Fresno County, the Partnership for the Future of Learning, and Sacramento County urged stronger requirements for shared governance, explicit commitment to the community schools framework, annual reporting beginning in year one, and continued or expanded support for coordinators and technical assistance. Several witnesses said the proposal should better protect county office coordination roles, maintain preferences for partnerships in the technical assistance structure, and ensure the system can support more than 6,000 schools. Others highlighted the need for specialized supports for middle and high schools, better integration with other state programs such as ELOP, universal meals, TK, and the LCFF equity multiplier, and more detailed accountability and accreditation processes. No formal vote was taken during the portion of the hearing reflected in the transcript. The chair indicated that the committee wanted additional information on the funding breakdown, the use of reverted funds, and the proposed support structure before taking action, and administration witnesses said a more detailed proposal would be brought forward in the May Revise.

Transcript Highlights:

• In regards to the discretionary program, we would also like for the Legislature to consider adding the
• The Legislature could adopt the Governor's proposal, though, with less money.
• You, the Legislature, have given them the authority to take the action a local school board...
• You, the Legislature, have given them the authority to take the action a local school board...
• We stand ready to work with the administration and the Legislature to secure the resources.

Summary: The committee heard opening public comment and then took up several K-12 budget items in the Governor’s January proposal. On LCFF and necessary small schools, the Department of Finance described a 2.41% COLA, a roughly $2.2 billion increase for districts and charters, and a $30.7 million ongoing augmentation to raise necessary small schools funding by 20%. The LAO supported funding the COLA and said the small schools proposal had merit, but questioned the 20% figure and warned about a sharp funding cliff around the enrollment thresholds. Members and witnesses repeatedly raised declining enrollment, attendance, and the need to align funding with outcomes and local cost pressures. The chair and several members also asked whether consolidation, shared administration, or alternative formulas could better address small district costs, and the issue was left open for further discussion. The panel then discussed special education equalization. Finance proposed $509 million ongoing Proposition 98 funding to raise the statewide special education base rate to $999 per ADA, which would fully equalize SELPA base rates; the LAO said the same target could likely be reached with less money under current assumptions. CDE strongly supported equalization as an equity issue and said about 15% of students are identified with disabilities, with identification rising by roughly 20,000 to 25,000 students per year. Members raised concerns about staffing shortages, high caseloads, and the need to use any additional funds for inclusive practices, alternative diploma pathways, and the extraordinary cost pool. The committee also discussed whether the budget language should reflect the $509 million amount or the $999 rate, and the item was held open. For the Learning Recovery Emergency Block Grant, Finance proposed restoring $757.3 million one-time to complete the program, while the LAO recommended approval because learning loss remains unresolved and districts have generally used the funds for tutoring, supplemental instruction, and other academic supports. CDE explained that LEAs must revisit their needs assessments and that many districts are using the funds alongside other support systems, but members pressed for clearer accountability and better data on how much money actually goes to tutoring or other direct services. The committee then reviewed the Student Support and Professional Development Discretionary Block Grant, with Finance proposing $2.8 billion one-time and the LAO saying discretionary funding can help districts address local priorities but should be paired with fiscal oversight and possibly more targeted priorities. Members split between supporting flexibility for local needs and worrying that the grant could be used to cover ongoing structural deficits without clear evidence of student-outcome gains; the issue was also held open. Finally, the committee heard a high-level overview of school facilities funding under Proposition 2, with Finance proposing to continue $1.5 billion in bond spending in 2026-27. OPSC said that at the current pace all Prop 2 K-12 funds would likely be exhausted around 2029-30, and that demand is shifting toward modernization as enrollment declines in many areas. Members asked about school closures, reuse of unused sites, and the new small school district facilities program, which OPSC said is moving toward proposed regulations and would begin accepting modernization applications in November 2026 and new construction applications in January 2027. The committee also briefly noted community college facilities funding and asked for more information later in the process.

Transcript Highlights:

• I think that's going to get 200 votes in this Legislature.
• I think that's going to get 200 votes in this Legislature.
• There needs to be bold action, and every person in this Legislature should cast their vote.
• I am— Every person in this Legislature should cast their vote.
• Sixty percent of Americans supported it, but not 60% of the legislature.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> urgency of the situation the legislature urgency of the situation the legislature established<00
• </c> Mack seeing the urgency the legislature Mack seeing the urgency the legislature took<00:49:09.160
• The legislature took action.
• </c><01:02:36.520><c> has</c> policies that the legislature has policies that the legislature has accomplished
• </c><01:23:27.679><c> appropriated</c> uh the uh the legislature appropriated uh the uh the legislature

Committee: Senate Housing and Homelessness Prevention

Transcript Highlights:

• Be it resolved by the Senate of the State of Washington, session of the 69th Legislature.
• Session of the 69th Legislature. Message received.
• Session of the 69th Legislature. Session of the 69th Legislature.
• Speaker, I move that the legislature adjourn, sine die.
• Senator Fitzgibbon has moved that the 2026 regular session of the 69th Legislature do now adjourn, sine

Summary: The chambers exchanged final messages on House Concurrent Resolution 4409 and Senate Concurrent Resolution 8410, with both resolutions reported as adopted and signed. The House also received notice that the Senate had adopted HCR 4409 and SCR 8410, and the Senate received notice that the House had adopted SCR 8410 and that the Speaker had signed HCR 4409. The House granted consent to suspend the rules so bills on the supplemental introduction sheet could be advanced to the third reading calendar. In the House, Representative Fitzgibbon moved adoption of Senate Concurrent Resolution 8410, which he described as a housekeeping measure clarifying the status of bills that had not completed the legislative process. Representative Corey supported the resolution as cleanup work. The House adopted the resolution by voice vote and agreed to immediately transmit it to the Senate. The Senate later reverted to the fourth order of business to receive House messages, including the signing and transmission of HCR 4409, the House adoption of SCR 8410, and the signing of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5998. The Senate then moved all measures on the floor calendar or held at the desk back to the Committee on Rules, approved the journal for the 60th day of the 2026 regular session, and adjourned the 69th Legislature sine die.

Transcript Highlights:

• In the 2024 session, the Legislature and Congress acted to remove disability income from government housing
• It's time for the Legislature to consider allowing the local land and tax use authorities to make this
• represent this part of the state, some of these communities that I did not prior to joining the legislature
• represent this part of the state, some of these communities that I did not prior to joining the legislature
• , The only one that... the borders of my district, which is the only district in the legislature, the

Committee: House Revenue and Taxation

Transcript Highlights:

• So there is some concern in the legislature, and in particular me, that once we, the legislature, sine
• die, there could be some things that happen within the health care space that the legislature may not
• Some of it's budgetary, but some of it may be things that happen in agencies that we as a legislature
• I would really expect that you would be reaching out to the legislature if any policy changes in any
• of these health agencies is going to happen to make sure the legislature has that opportunity.

Committee: Senate Health and Human Services

Summary: The Senate Health and Human Services Committee met to consider a series of gubernatorial nominations, first for several boards and commissions and then for key health-related executive positions. Early confirmations included Michael Vaughn to the Board of Licensed Alcohol and Drug Counselors, Tina Frazier to the State Board of Licensed Social Workers, Dr. Kanya Martin and Dr. Edgar Boyd to the Board of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Dr. Christopher Thurman to the Health Care Workforce Training Commission, Samuel Haubrick and Robert Wipp Jr. to the Committee of Home Inspector Examiners, and Dr. Gabriel Pittman to the State Board of Health. Each nominee briefly described their background and qualifications, and committee members generally emphasized professional experience, public service, and rural health needs. All of these nominations advanced on unanimous or near-unanimous votes. The committee then considered Clayton Bullard for two roles: Cabinet Secretary of Health and Mental Health and Administrator of the Oklahoma Health Care Authority. Senators focused heavily on Medicaid managed care, provider payment delays, MCO oversight, and the short timeline before a new administration. Bullard said his priority would be stabilizing the agency, building a balanced budget, monitoring contractors and managed care organizations, and ensuring claims are paid promptly; he reported high rates of clean-claim payment within 14 days and said the agency would continue fining MCOs for noncompliance. Members also pressed him on legislative oversight and the need to keep lawmakers informed about policy changes. Both nominations were approved and sent to the full Senate. Sharon Schell Millington was then nominated to lead the Office of Juvenile Affairs. Senators asked about security concerns, staff safety, de-escalation training, pay for direct care staff, and coordination with local law enforcement. Millington said the agency had increased staff pay, adopted nationally recognized restraint/de-escalation training, and was working to improve communication with law enforcement. Her nomination also passed and moved to the Senate floor. At the end of the meeting, the chair answered a question about board membership requirements, clarified that the statute limits how many members may reside in one congressional district but does not require every district to be represented, and thanked committee staff for their work as the committee’s final HHS meeting of the session.

Transcript Highlights:

• They were all created at different times for different reasons by the legislature.
• And one of the reasons that the legislature wanted to...
• And one of the reasons the legislature wanted us to develop a prioritization approach for fish passage
• So in 2020, the legislature directed Fish and Wildlife, DOT, and the Fish Barrier... ...money, the legislature
• So the legislature just... Yes, we do.

Committee: House Capital Budget

Transcript Highlights:

• If the legislature appropriates money for a certain thing, that is what the money is supposed to go to
• So all this bill is trying to do is keep the legislature in control of the funds and how that money is
• As long as it goes through the process of the legislature, it lets schools still have that discretionary
• It just has to come through the legislature to get the approval in order to use those monies outside
• And it had been broadcast on the news about how the state legislature had given these teachers $6,000

Committee: House Education

Transcript Highlights:

• Again, I think it's something that we, remember, of course, we in the legislature are going to be the
• And the legislature are going to be the ones for anything that comes of that magnitude.
• So, Madam Chair and Senator, at what point does it have to come to the legislature so that we would be
• We receive our appropriations through the legislature, so we would have to come to the legislature to
• But we have not come to the legislature for any types of renovations yet.

Bills: SB238 , HJR1 , SM21 , SM22

Committee: Senate Senate Rules

Transcript Highlights:

• In the following year, the agency will come before the legislature to request the appropriation to zero
• In the following year, the agency will come before the legislature to request the appropriation to zero
• You know, we, the legislature adjourned sine die last spring with projected revenues of $5,929 million
• So there are decision points for this legislature here.
• That was the Department of Health and Welfare helping the legislature set the budget and saying, 'Hey

Committee: Senate Agricultural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:

• Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee to evaluate the program and submit a report to the legislature
• That work group was created by the Legislature and comprised representatives from the National Federation
• I'm pleased to report that in December the work group provided the Legislature and this committee with
• I'm pleased to report that in December the work group provided the Legislature and this committee with
• the pilot program, and it requires the department to study the outcomes and report back to the Legislature

Summary: The Labor and Workplace Standards Committee held a public hearing on House Bill 2479, the Wage Recovery Act, which would create a wage recovery program and account to provide limited advance payments to low-wage workers facing immediate hardship from unpaid wages, while also changing how L&I prioritizes wage complaints and increasing civil penalties for willful wage violations. The bill was described as a consensus product of a labor-business work group, and testimony from the sponsor, work group members, business groups, and labor organizations was strongly supportive, emphasizing faster wage recovery, better enforcement, and a balanced approach to wage theft. No one testified in opposition. The committee then moved into executive session and took action on several bills. It reported out House Bill 291, extending employee contact-information sharing requirements to all state agencies; House Bill 2105, as amended, on notice requirements for I-9 audits and related records; House Bill 2107, as amended, on L&I notice to employers after construction-site hazard inspections; House Bill 2151, as amended, on factory-built housing and inspection standards; House Bill 2190, on compensation for language access providers for missed appointments; House Bill 2303, as amended, prohibiting employer requests or coercion for microchip implantation; and House Bill 2345, as amended, adjusting paid family and medical leave premium allocation to address an IRS-related issue. The committee also deferred action on House Bills 2191 and 2218. Several amendments were adopted during executive session, including technical and policy changes to HB 2105, a carve-out in HB 2151 for certain prefabricated enclosures used for energy equipment, and removal of administrative enforcement from HB 2303. Final votes were largely bipartisan, with most measures passing on voice vote or by recorded vote and receiving due pass recommendations.

Transcript Highlights:

• That's why the legislature specified those professions.
• The legislature has already worked to ensure that most intangible...
• This could absolutely lock up city government, and this state needs to—this legislature needs to take
• Well, I think it's, I mean, you can always come to the legislature, but that's every other year.
• So that stands, because you know the legislature has interfered on that specific ground already.

Bills: SB250 , SB375 , SB536 , SB845 , SB1633 , SB1944 , SB1957 , SB2081 , SB2137 , SB2262 , SB2299 , SB2419 , SB2452 , SB2522 , SB2549 , SB2594 , SB2605 , SB2631 , SB2639 , SB2675 , SB3029 , SJR60 , HB22 , HB1392 , HB2525 , HB22

Committee: Senate Local Government