Transcript Highlights:

• The increase from the base, if we looked at what we budgeted last time, was $650 million over base in
• Note that this is just tuition and fees, not the full cost of attendance.
• cover the remaining tuition and fees cover the remaining tuition and fees that<01:03:41.400>
• The tuition and fees do vary somewhat institution to institution.
• <01:24:33.760> for instate full-time tuition and fees for instate full-time tuition and fees

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The Higher Ed Finance and Policy Committee met to begin a budget overview for higher education. The chair noted quorum, committee member introductions, and that Democratic members were absent. The chair also said the Office of Higher Education would not be appearing for the planned budget deep dive, so nonpartisan fiscal staff would present instead. Ken Savory, the committee’s nonpartisan fiscal analyst, introduced a presentation on the higher education finance structure and timeline. Savory explained the state budget cycle, the difference between direct appropriations, statutory appropriations, open appropriations, base funding, tails, and one-time appropriations, and how those concepts apply to higher education. He described the committee’s usual budget areas: the Office of Higher Education, Minnesota State, the University of Minnesota, and the Mayo Foundation. He also reviewed historical spending charts showing higher education’s share of the general fund over time, the 2/3-1/3 funding policy in statute, and how tuition and general fund support have shifted. He noted that the FY 26-27 base for the Office of Higher Education area is about $725 million, including roughly $450 million for the State Grant program and about $99 million for North Star Promise. Members asked about comparing the current budget to earlier biennia, and staff responded that they would need to calculate the percentage difference. The chair then summarized prior budget growth, saying the previous budget was about $650 million over base and the current budget/tail was about $450 million over base. Staff also reviewed the 2024 omnibus higher education bill, including a roughly $5 million reduction to North Star Promise that was redirected to the Fostering Independence Grant program and a $500,000 appropriation for Minnesota State’s Kids on Campus program. The committee did not take any formal votes or actions during this portion of the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• And so we have seen significant increases.
• Our tuition and fees estimated for 2425, based on our Institutions' tuition and fees estimated for 2425
• And then finally, you see our big increase of 15.16%.
• state funds and 30% tuition and fees for the Florida College System.
• They've increased enrollment at different rates.

Summary: The Appropriations Committee for Higher Education met to review Florida’s workforce and Florida College System funding models as part of budget planning. Chair Harrell opened by emphasizing the state’s growing focus on technical education and workforce pathways, and the committee first heard from Tara Goodman of the Department of Education on district workforce education. Goodman explained the programs funded through district workforce dollars, including career certificates, applied technology diplomas, registered apprenticeship, and adult general education, and described the model’s reliance on lagged enrollment, program cost weights, local tuition offsets, and supplemental factors such as disability services, GED testing, and minimum funding for small rural districts. She also noted federal support through Perkins and WIOA and said the model is used to determine unmet need and guide appropriations. In response to questions, she said health care programs are generally among the higher-cost offerings and may be supplemented by pipeline funds. The committee then heard from Kathy Hebda, Chancellor of the Florida College System, on the college system’s funding model. Hebda described the main funding sources, including the program fund, student success incentive funds, pipeline funds, tuition and fees, and performance-based incentives, and explained that the current model was developed by the 28 college presidents under legislative direction. She said the model uses a three-year average FTE, weights workforce enrollment more heavily than non-workforce enrollment, gives significant weight to completions, includes a small-college factor and regional cost differentials, and also provides targeted funding to bring colleges up to a floor based on per-FTE funding. Senators asked about colleges below the target, cost differences among programs, faculty salaries, and health insurance costs; Hebda said the model is meant to provide flexible operating dollars that colleges can use for those expenses, but specific salary and benefit decisions are left to the institutions. Seminole State College President Georgia Lorenz also testified in support of the college funding model, saying it holds institutions accountable for enrollment and completions, can be adjusted to reflect state priorities like workforce, and addresses differences in size and regional costs. No bills were voted on, and the committee adjourned after brief closing remarks thanking Seminole State College and the presenters.

Transcript Highlights:

• The goal of the compact is to address these challenges by increasing access to care.
• And that includes the tuition and fee waiver program.
• And that includes the tuition and fee waiver program.
• When these resources don't work as intended or don't cover fee waiver program.
• We're paying the tuition and fees of students at universities and colleges from...

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Higher Education heard testimony on a broad set of bills focused on making public higher education more affordable and accessible, protecting student information, and changing social work licensure rules. Chair Rogers and Senator Comerford opened by emphasizing the committee’s focus on financial aid, tuition and fee waivers, scholarships, admissions, and institutional changes, and they reminded witnesses about the three-minute testimony limit. No votes were taken during the hearing. A large portion of the hearing centered on the “Super Act” (H. 1423/S. 218), which would eliminate the master’s-level social work licensing exam and create grant support for social work internships. Supporters—including students, practitioners, educators, and advocates—argued that unpaid internships and the exam create financial barriers, worsen workforce shortages, and disproportionately affect Black, brown, older, ESL, and other marginalized candidates. Opponents from the Association of Social Work Boards argued the exam is a necessary public-protection standard, helps maintain uniform licensure, and is important to the social work licensure compact; they said workforce shortages should be addressed through pay, working conditions, and caseloads instead. Committee members asked detailed questions about compact participation, exam accommodations, and how other states such as Rhode Island and Connecticut have handled similar changes. The committee also heard extensive testimony in favor of debt-free public higher education bills (H. 1436/S. 929). Witnesses, including students, faculty, advocates, and Senator Eldridge, said Massachusetts should expand on free community college by covering tuition and mandatory fees at public colleges and universities, with additional aid for living costs for lower-income students. Supporters said student debt delays homeownership, family formation, and career entry, and that the state should use Fair Share revenue to invest in public higher education. Some committee members voiced support but also raised concerns about prioritizing K-12 funding and the cost of expanding free college further. Several witnesses also supported bills to extend tuition and fee waivers to young adults raised by grandparents or other kinship guardians outside the DCF system, arguing that these students face the same trauma and financial barriers as foster youth but do not receive the same benefits. Representative Donato, Joseph O’Leary, Shauna Manning, Sandra Vecchio, Karen Gardner, Judy Walter, Elaine Arsenault, and others described the financial strain on grandparents raising grandchildren and urged parity with DCF-related waivers. In addition, Senator Jake Oliveira testified for a bill to protect public higher education student directory information from data mining and unauthorized sharing, and Deirdre Cummings testified for an open educational resources bill to reduce textbook costs. The hearing concluded with continued testimony on kinship care and college access, with committee members thanking witnesses and indicating follow-up on some bill language issues.

Transcript Highlights:

• The new entity would collect license fees. You'll look at what those license fees are.
• The issue of fees, that is correct. Those fees are going to be set by the new director.
• What those fees are and...
• Setting of the fees now, so all of these boards pretty much said they own fees.
• On why it removes that incentive: it removes the incentive to fine and fee and increase licenses.

Bills: SB174, SB180, HB196, HB25, SB193, HB25

Keywords: business taxes, annual reports, Alabama Tax Tribunal, tax appeals, local government, media monitoring, government contracts, state agencies, local agencies, media regulations, transparency, juvenile detention, county management, legal procedures, juvenile justice, county commission, supervision, administration, emergency services, 911

Transcript Highlights:

• So first, focusing on the increased funding.
• But since that point, despite a fee increase, a pretty sizable fee increase in 2019, solvency concerns
• On item number three, we support the proposed increased hourly rate increase of $10 for the appellate
• I'm grateful. that you're talking about this $10 an hour increase, but I'm asking for the $40 increase
• and the 30% increase in the panels.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Thank industry from this delivery fee.
• Most of our delivery delivery fee.
• <00:14:10.160> while the only the business pays a fee while the only the business pays a fee
• this fee was an unintended consequence. this fee was an unintended consequence.
• <00:15:37.199> covered exemptions in the delivery fee covered exemptions in the delivery fee

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• in fees and increases in other costs to the taxpayers?
• It does not promise that fees won't increase. It does not promise that renters won't pay more.
• Will local governments be forced to raise fees? Will sales tax increase?
• Will local governments be forced to raise fees? Will sales tax increase?
• your garbage fees, increase your fire fees, and increase everything else that we can think of so that

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• than a 3% increase annually.
• than a 3% increase annually.
• than a 3% increase annually.
• than a 3% increase annually.
• Our lot rents increased and have continued to increase anywhere from $50 to $65 annually.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh it serve those patients increase.
• It's a high-volume operation, essentially self-funding due to the fees and transaction fees.
• <05:11:34.718> Um due to the fees and transaction fees.
• Um due to the fees and transaction fees.
• <06:01:27.360> um fee plus the commenurate parking fee um fee plus the commenurate parking

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And since that time, CalRecycle announced a fee increase in December of last year that was nearly a 5,000%
• increase in the processing fee, effective January 1st of this year.
• We had almost a 5,000 percent increase in our processing fee starting January 1st.
• It's just right-sizing that fee. I appreciate both of your analyses of this bill.
• Earlier this year, CARB announced that HVIP had ...increase in truck prices.

Summary: The committee heard a series of Senate bills on environmental, climate, recycling, wildfire, outdoor access, and clean transportation policy. SB 958 would clarify CEQA treatment of impacts tied solely to increased building height, and SB 1230 would increase penalties and create CalRecycle support tools for repeat commercial illegal dumping. SB 1341 would revise how processing fees are calculated for bag-in-a-box wine under California’s recycling program. All three measures received due-pass recommendations to Appropriations, with roll calls showing majority support and the bills left open for absent members. Members then took up SB 1300, which would create a more permanent legislative role in California’s international climate cooperation and establish a climate secretariat at UC; SB 1370, which would codify and streamline wildfire fuel-reduction permitting with added safeguards, geographic and size limits, and pesticide-related amendments; and SB 1260/1268, which would codify the Outdoors for All initiative and the Deputy Secretary for Access position at the Natural Resources Agency. Each drew support from environmental, utility, business, and local-government witnesses, while SB 1370 also drew opposition from environmental and advocacy groups concerned about reduced CEQA review and herbicide use. The committee discussed amendments at length, especially on SB 1370, and all three measures advanced with due-pass recommendations. The committee also heard SB 1213, the Clean Truck Transparency Act, requiring baseline pricing disclosure for medium- and heavy-duty zero-emission trucks tied to state incentives and directing agencies to explore alternative financing. Support came from clean-air, business, and environmental groups, and the trucking/manufacturing opposition moved to neutral after amendments; the bill advanced on a due-pass vote. Finally, SB 1075, the Clean Air Promise, sought to strengthen AB 617 implementation and clarify community emission reduction planning, but it generated substantial opposition from air districts, business groups, and others over enforceability, funding, and the distinction between formal SERPs and community L-SERPs. The author described additional pending amendments to narrow L-SERP provisions, and the bill also received a due-pass recommendation to Appropriations.

Transcript Highlights:

• in the foundational school program required to be used for provide compensation increases or for the
• HB 3921 by Tallarico relating to increasing the criminal penalty for the offense of aggregated sexual
• HB 3931 by Raymond relates to the fee for public inspection of election records or for the Committee
• HB 3973 by Richardson relating to prohibiting a fee for the parent-taught driver's education provider
• HB 4074 by Morgan relates to licensing requirements for insurance and appraisers authorizing fees and

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:14:12.920> local we can all agree that increased local we can all agree that increased
• Why isn't it 'tax increase'?
• <02:17:08.200> and increase it should say tax increase and increase it should say tax increase
• <06:12:16.200> are fee um calculations impact fees are fee um calculations impact fees are
• impact fees may be assessed.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• in fees and increases in other costs to the taxpayers?
• It does not promise that fees won't increase. It does not promise that renters won't pay more.
• Will local governments be forced to raise fees? Will sales tax increase? Will...
• Will local governments be forced to raise fees? Will sales tax increase?
• your garbage fees, increase your fire fees, and increase everything else that we can think of so that

Summary: The Senate took up Committee Substitute for Senate Joint Resolution 2F, a proposed constitutional amendment on property tax reform. The measure would increase the homestead exemption in stages, lower the assessment cap on non-homestead property from 10% to 5%, and limit county and municipal ad valorem tax revenues to specified uses such as public safety, education, infrastructure, natural resources, debt service, employee benefits, and certain administrative costs. Supporters, led by Senator Avila, argued the proposal would provide meaningful property tax relief and push local governments to rein in spending, while opponents warned it would shift costs to fees, reduce local flexibility, and threaten funding for core services. Several amendments were offered and rejected. Senator Sharief proposed an income-based circuit breaker for property tax relief; Senator Smith offered a sunset clause; and Senator Berman proposed revising the ballot statement to better match the amended proposal and remove outdated references. Each amendment failed on recorded votes. During questioning and debate, senators pressed Avila on the ballot language, the effect on local services, whether the legislature could later restrict local spending by statute, and whether renters would benefit. Avila said the ballot language was not his and repeatedly stated he was presenting the governor’s proposal, while also saying local governments would need to prioritize budgets and that future legislatures could address implementation details. After the amendment votes, the joint resolution was read a third time and moved into final debate. Supporters said the proposal would give homeowners relief and force fiscal discipline at the local level. Opponents, including Senators Nathan, Bracey Davis, Smith, Polsky, and Errington, argued the measure was rushed, lacked a completed fiscal analysis or replacement revenue, and could harm police, fire, libraries, parks, housing, and other local services. They also criticized the ballot summary as misleading, especially regarding the staged homestead exemption increase. The transcript ends during debate, before any final vote on the joint resolution itself.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:35:36.160> the that I don't think that increasing the that I don't think that increasing
• There is a set license fee.
• So, right now all Granite Staters are dealing with increased costs without increased income.
• cost-of-living increase to offset increased property tax values, which then increases property taxes
• to offset increased property tax values, which then increases property taxes.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee first took up House Bill 702, which would change how extra or special duty pay for retired police officers is treated for retirement and work-limit purposes. Supporters argued the bill would let retirees work more special-duty hours, helping municipalities fill traffic-detail and similar assignments without added state cost, and said it would not prohibit retirees from working but would simply stop those hours from counting toward the return-to-work threshold. Opponents argued the change would be inconsistent with the retirement system’s 2011 reforms, could increase pension liabilities, and would treat the same compensation differently for active employees and retirees. Members also discussed whether the bill would affect current and future retirees, the role of municipalities, and whether the policy amounted to “policing for profit.” The subcommittee ultimately voted 3-2 to recommend inexpedient to legislate (ITL) on HB 702, sending it to the full committee with that recommendation. The committee then discussed House Bill 581, which would create a Group Three retirement plan for new state employees hired after the bill’s effective date. The chair outlined a housekeeping amendment to delay implementation, moving the effective date to January 1, 2026, and noted a sponsor amendment addressing health insurance group inclusion and medical and surgical benefits so those benefits would not be put at risk for the new group. Testimony and discussion focused on the shift from defined benefit to defined contribution, with supporters citing Michigan examples and arguing the bill would help recruit and retain employees while giving them more flexibility. Opponents said the change could weaken retirement security and increase unfunded liability, though supporters responded that the bill still requires employer contributions toward accrued liability and is intended to keep the state on track to pay off its unfunded liability by 2039. The transcript ends with continued discussion of the bill and no final vote shown on HB 581.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:18:52.520> So, for our fee-for-service program. So, for our fee-for-service program.
• fee-for-service program. fee-for-service program.
• require on the fee-for-service side. require on the fee-for-service side.
• TEFRA fees.
• because of of increased TEFRA fees. because of of increased TEFRA fees.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• HB3012 removes a mandated $3 course fee from the education...
• Each permit also incurs an additional $3,000 fee.
• In 2018, Austin determined the average. ...removal fee to be one hundred and fifty dollars.
• They're just there for people to collect these fees.
• It increases license portability for cosmetologists.

Bills: HB589, HB705, HB1842, HB1874, HB2349, HB2614, HB2827, HB3012, HB3214, HB3308, HB3385, HB3529

Keywords: cosmetology, licensure, interstate compact, state regulations, public safety, workforce mobility, charitable raffles, nonprofit, wildlife conservation, ticket sales, fundraising, master electrician, electrical work, occupational licensing, work scope, Texas law, Texas Real Estate Commission, TREC, real estate broker, sales agent

Transcript Highlights:

• This pertains to an increase in appropriated receipts.
• As such, I am requesting a 6 percent salary increase for 2026 and the same in 2027.
• Was it a contingency fee contract? What were the provisions?
• Contingency fee contracts are 35 to 40 percent. We negotiate at a much lower level.
• Is that why you've asked for a **6%** increase?

Bills: SB 1

Keywords: campground safety, youth camp regulations, flood safety, emergency evacuation, health and safety standards, 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It—the fee prescribed here...
• , they cannot charge a towing fee until they pay another fee for an outside vendor to come in. >> It's
• fee to send certified mail.
• fees.
• There is a fee for that, but it's a discounted fee that they get because they request so many of these

Keywords: MS Senate Floor - 1 April, 2026; 10:00 AM, 925, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I said that residents pay a 5% franchise fee.
• Similarly, telecom customers pay a fee per access line, and the fee per line is set by the municipality
• This causes costs to increase.
• We do not set the fees that we collect. The Public Utilities Commission sets those fees.
• for the increase in public works projects across the state.

Transcript Highlights:

• That would be an hourly fee.
• Our call volume has increased substantially.
• And we really need an increase.
• and higher education student fees.
• I will never be the legislator that says we should increase fees on students. Right.

Summary: The Information Technology Committee approved the March 26 minutes and received a series of reports from NDIT on major IT projects, the annual report, mainframe modernization, and cybersecurity services. The project portfolio was reported at 116 major projects with a baseline cost of $546 million, overall under budget but modestly behind schedule. Several projects that had been in variance status last quarter were said to have closed, including HHS bed management, vital records modernization, and DOT roadway capital planning. New startup reports were mostly HHS efforts tied to refugee data management, technical debt cleanup, and legacy application decommissioning, while closeouts included HHS, OMB, DPI, and DOT projects with mixed budget and schedule results. In the annual report discussion, NDIT described its service-fund financials, peer-state rate comparisons, records management reporting, and customer satisfaction efforts. Members asked about how revenues and grants flow through the service fund, how NDIT charges agencies for services, and whether customer satisfaction or CSAT scores are tracked and could be reported more regularly. NDIT said it does track service-team CSAT and survey data, and committee members encouraged more regular reporting of those metrics. The committee also discussed application portfolio management, statewide IT planning, and whether agencies should slow new system replacements while the state pursues an ERP system. The mainframe update focused on the state’s ongoing effort to retire legacy systems by about 2030. NDIT and HHS said the work is being managed as a tech-debt program, but progress is slowed by data cleanup, integration complexity, staff retirements, vendor capacity, and federal requirements. Members asked whether there is a coordinated commitment and whether additional vendor support or consultants are needed; NDIT said it is working jointly with HHS and is seeking an RFP to help accelerate modernization. The cybersecurity presentation then shifted to statewide maturity assessments and services. NDIT said it provides endpoint protection, vulnerability scanning, security awareness training, threat briefings, and penetration testing, and that assessments are based on CIS controls. Members raised concerns about low participation in the self-assessment process, the lack of mandatory reporting or audit authority, and whether insurance incentives through Enderf or possible State Auditor involvement could improve compliance. No formal votes were taken beyond approval of the minutes.