Video & Transcript Research : 'data transparency'

Page 86 of 500
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • The Senate amendments to House Bill 2153 ensure transparency in the decision-making process as OSSAA
  • Senate amendment to 3413 asked that agencies that already published that information in a plain and transparent
  • manner on their own dashboard to simply be able to, if approved by OES, provide a hyperlink to that data
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • This is a data center ratepayer protection bill.
  • Just one more question about the data and information that's collected. I do have concerns there.
  • What kind of data privacy measures or protections are there to make sure that information isn't sent
  • doctor's office, the credit card company, the loan company, about how your data is cared for.
  • If you don't want your data at risk, do not use the internet. That's the simple thing.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill requires initial or ongoing claims be cross-checked against outlying data sets.
  • This would just ensure that they’re doing them more frequently across more data sources.
  • This would just ensure that they're doing them more frequently across more data sources.
  • Because that level of transparency eliminates freedom.
  • Because that level of transparency eliminates freedom.
Summary: The committee first heard SB 1036, which would tighten unemployment insurance eligibility by requiring five weekly work-search actions, weekly reporting to DES, cross-checks against outside data sets before payment, and employer reporting when former employees refuse work or return-to-work offers. The sponsor and supporters said the bill is aimed at reducing fraud and overpayments and encouraging faster reemployment, while DES said it was neutral but warned of implementation costs, added workload, and possible impacts on apprenticeship programs and appeals. After a technical amendment was adopted, the bill received a do-pass as amended recommendation on a 4-3 vote. The committee then considered SB 1054, a strike-everything amendment dealing with city and town emergency measures. The bill would make local emergency ordinances and resolutions subject to referendum, with a 30-day filing window and a ballot vote determining whether the measure remains in effect. Mayors and council members from Payson testified in support, describing repeated use of emergency clauses to pass tax and bond measures and arguing the practice undermines the constitutional referendum right; the League of Arizona Cities and Towns opposed the bill, saying it would defeat the purpose of emergency powers and slow city responses to true crises. The committee adopted the amendment and gave the bill a do-pass as amended recommendation on a 4-2 vote. Next, SCR 1022 was heard, proposing to increase the House from 60 to 90 members, with three House districts nested within each Senate district, subject to voter approval and delayed applicability. The sponsor argued the change would improve representation by reducing the number of constituents per legislator and make Arizona more in line with other states; some members raised concerns about cost, logistics, and the need for more study, while one public witness strongly supported the measure. After adopting an amendment delaying implementation from 2033 to 2043, the resolution received a do-pass as amended recommendation on a 5-2 vote. The committee also approved SB 1271, which would bar municipalities from penalizing businesses based on the number of emergency-service calls or the value of stolen or damaged property, with exceptions for malicious, knowingly false, or frivolous calls. Supporters said the bill protects businesses from being discouraged from calling 911, and the Goldwater Institute said it would preserve access to emergency services while still allowing action on false alarms; the bill passed 6-1. SB 1437, requiring public records to be provided in the least expensive manner possible and electronically when requested, also passed unanimously after testimony from Goldwater about high fees and delays for electronic records. Finally, the committee began hearing SB 1439, a strike-everything amendment creating a Conservative Grassroots Network special license plate and fund, but the transcript cuts off before testimony or action on that item.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Jul 30th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • But they're also not bringing in the Attorney General. and data that I've seen, the Attorney General's
  • This does not preclude them from. paying the association to do data, bill analysis, none of that, is
  • They repeatedly lobby against transparency. transparency.
  • You have mentioned a lot about lobbyists concealing their position, a lack of transparency, that this
  • That's all the data I need. I oppose this amendment.
Bills: SB5, SB11, SB12, SB9, SB42, SB15, SB5, SB11, SB12, SCR1
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) Jul 30th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Got a whole lot of data on it.
  • So the actual data, if you believe that, well, we just don't have data on it, then let me, I'm just.
  • It was all super bipartisan, and we want to stay rooted in the data.
  • I think the data is used conveniently. Enforcement says different.
  • What do you think is the reason why there is not much scientific data?
Bills: SB5, SB11, SB12, SB9, SB42, SB15, SB5, SB11, SB12, SCR1
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 22nd, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • This process enhances transparency and ensures decisions reflect the broader community's priorities by
  • This is a transparency bill that adds additional taxpayer transparency to our public contracts.
  • So we think making the information subject to open transparency is important.
  • I think transparency is important too.
  • Because of the non-profit tax-exempt status, we should prioritize them in this transparency effort.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 22nd, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • This ensures a structured and transparent process for evaluating these developments.
  • Personally, I feel that, you know, just for me, being able to gather the data, it's a lot of these smaller
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • According to the Director of National Intelligence, they're collecting data and cultivating information
  • basically look like they're coming from the Chinese embassy, but the state doesn't necessarily have transparency
  • So it is a much more transparent approach.
  • It allows for much more transparency regarding how the system works between a plaintiff's attorney and
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • There's more data in the written testimony, and I think you'll find it helpful. Thank you.
  • We need to collect the data.
  • It was about the LMHAs collecting data. One of the data points we wanted was refusal to engage.
  • There are a couple more data points I really think you should know about.
  • Again, my data bill, 2488, I think you'll find to be of value.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) Apr 14th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The process will basically be totally transparent to them.
  • We need to collect the data.
  • SB 26 last session, it was about the LMHA's collecting data.
  • And I appreciate your commentary specific to data.
  • Again, my data bill, 2488, I think you'll find to be of value.
Summary: The committee first adopted a committee substitute for Senate Bill 30 and then voted to report the substituted bill favorably to the full Senate; the roll call showed six ayes and one nay, with later unanimous-consent corrections noted for additional aye votes. The committee also reported Senate Bill 801 favorably to the full Senate by an eight-to-one vote. Both bills were left with no further action in the meeting after the votes. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2595 by Senator Middleton and Senate Bill 2876 by Chairman Hughes, both aimed at addressing masked harassment and riot-related conduct. Supporters said the bills would deter intimidation, protect public order, and respond to recent protests and anti-Semitic incidents, while opponents from civil rights, disability, and advocacy groups argued the measures were overly broad, could chill peaceful protest, and would burden people who wear masks for religious, medical, or disability-related reasons. Public testimony was taken on both bills, and both were left pending after testimony closed. Senate Bill 2753, by Senator Hall, proposed consolidating early voting and election day into a single continuous in-person voting period with common procedures and equipment, while preserving countywide voting and mail voting. The Secretary of State’s office said the bill could improve ballot secrecy and simplify administration, though witnesses raised concerns about ballot privacy, logistics, and access for disabled voters; some county election officials were neutral or supportive of the concept, while others opposed it as confusing or potentially burdensome. The bill was left pending after extensive testimony. The committee also heard Senate Bill 2225 on allowing spirit-based ready-to-drink beverages to be sold in grocery and convenience stores, with supporters arguing the law should focus on alcohol content rather than the source of the alcohol and that the bill would modernize an outdated code. Later, Senate Bill 1540, which would add election officials and related workers to confidentiality protections, drew support from county election officials who described threats and harassment, though one witness suggested the bill’s language may need technical adjustment to better match its intent. Finally, Senate Bill 2382, concerning statewide voter registration systems and offline counties, drew opposition from county election administrators and vendors who warned about capacity, cybersecurity, and single-point-of-failure risks, while others suggested a phased approach or API-based integration; the transcript ends with testimony still open on that bill.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Apr 14th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • According to the Director of National Intelligence, they're collecting data, cultivating and influencing
  • basically look like they're coming from the Chinese embassy, but the state doesn't necessarily have transparency
  • So it is a much more transparent system, allowing for much more transparency regarding how the system
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs heard Senate Bill 3031, which would expand aggravated assault to cover certain road-rage shootings involving a person in or traveling to or from a motor vehicle, when a firearm is discharged and causes injury, property damage, or fear of serious bodily injury. Senator Schwertner laid out the bill for the author, described it as closing a gap in the law, and there was no public testimony; the bill was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2514, a measure by Chairman Hughes aimed at creating a DPS unit to identify, investigate, and monitor hostile foreign influence operations and to require ethics training for state employees. Supportive invited testimony from Dr. Jacqueline Deal, Ambassador Kelly Curry, and Michael Lucci emphasized threats from the Chinese Communist Party, transnational repression, cyber intrusion, and state-level influence efforts, and argued Texas should take a leading role. Public testimony included opposition from speakers who raised concerns about free speech, privacy, and potential overbreadth. The bill was left pending after testimony closed. Finally, the committee took up Senate Bill 30 as pending business and discussed a committee substitute. Senator Schwertner explained that the substitute would limit admissible medical expense evidence to amounts paid or up to 300% of Medicare, clarify treatment of provider testimony and attorney-referred providers, remove a requirement that plaintiffs use available health insurance to mitigate damages, strike a unanimous-verdict requirement for non-economic damages, and delete a remittitur provision. Senators questioned the impact on sexual assault and child abuse survivors, the use of Medicare as a benchmark, and whether the bill would still allow fair compensation. After discussion, SB 30 was left pending and the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Apr 14th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • This database brings much-needed transparency.
  • Of regulation that mandates transparency, promotes good behavior in the industry.
  • And just being transparent, and so just with my experience with taking...
  • It's a simple transparency bill, really.
  • It's really based on how Chase Bank sends data back and forth all day, and Wells sends data back and
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Apr 14th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • First, HB4061 requires the largest banks in the U.S. to provide transparency to their customers.
  • When a small merchant receives 30,000 lines of data in their monthly statement, that is neither clear
  • I think the least we can ask for is some transparency in the space.
  • Then the data is processed by the credit card networks.
  • So it's not that the data doesn't exist; it does exist as part of the global payment system.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 14th, 2026 at 09:36 am

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill will prohibit the sharing of the data with a third party if the data is going to be used to
  • Our public safety, our law enforcement can use this data, but to be able to sell this data and also to
  • When you say private entity, do you mean the party collecting the data or the party whose data is being
  • This data can be shared.
  • , but there may be other vendors or brokers that do sell this data. this data, but there may be other
Bills: HB294, SB40, SB43, SB35