Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:14:08.160><c> chairman</c><00:14:08.480><c> members</c><00:14:08.680><c> of</c><00:14:08.759>
• :23.279><c> very</c><00:14:23.519><c> good</c><00:14:23.839><c> uh</c><00:14:23.959><c> DD</c><00:14:
• 14:25.800><c> wanted</c><00:14:26.040><c> to</c><00:14:26.240><c> clarify</c><00:14:26.720><c> for</c
• for everyone I<00:14:27.720><c> actually</c><00:14:28.199><c> was</c><00:14:28.519><c> here</c><00:14
• c><00:14:30.759><c> who</c><00:14:30.920><c> is</c><00:14:31.079><c> an</c><00:14:31.240><c> army</c>

Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 100, which would place cigarettes, vapes, and related nicotine products under the Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) system, add enforcement tools against bad actors, and regulate nitrous oxide/laughing gas sales to those under 21. Supporters, including youth advocates Mallerie Jones and Griffin Kian Neth, argued the bill would reduce youth access to nicotine products through retail licensing, compliance checks, and escalating penalties. Higdon said the bill targets illegal sales rather than most retailers, and noted the measure also updates House Bill 11 from the prior year and raises the retail license fee from $250 to $500. The committee adopted the committee substitute and then passed the bill on a roll call vote, with members voting yes and no opposition recorded in the transcript. The committee then considered Senate Bill 202, focused on cannabis-infused beverages. Senator Julie Raque Adams said the bill was intended to create common-sense public health guardrails for a rapidly growing product category sold in gas stations, liquor stores, and vape shops, and to address enforcement gaps. She explained the committee substitute would define cannabis-infused beverages at a 5-milligram limit per 12-ounce can, place enforcement under ABC while keeping CHFS manufacturing and testing rules in place, require a University of Kentucky report back to the General Assembly, allow existing higher-dose inventory to be sold through June 1, exempt festivals and fairs until January 1, 2026, and allow stores to obtain licenses to continue selling the product. The committee adopted the substitute and then heard testimony from hemp-industry representatives and a consumer. Opponents of SB 202/SB 22, including Dee Taylor of the Kentucky Hemp Association, Cornbread Hemp co-founder Jim Higdon, Annie Rouse of Cannabuzz Barn, and consumer Nancy Roberts, argued the bill would hurt a legal Kentucky hemp industry, reduce consumer access, and force sales into liquor stores. They said the 100-milligram beverage referenced in debate is actually 10 servings with a resealable top, that hemp retailers educate customers, and that the industry already operates under 2024 regulations and needs better enforcement rather than new restrictions. Higdon and Rouse objected to the 5-milligram cap, the on-premise sales ban, the move to ABC enforcement, and the taxation approach, warning the bill could wipe out a large share of business and jobs. No final vote on SB 202 was taken in the portion of the transcript provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, just<00:14:01.920><c> a</c><00:14:02.160><c> number</c><00:14:02.240><c> of</c><00:14:02.639><c>
• 100%</c><00:14:06.079><c> and</c><00:14:06.399><c> many</c><00:14:06.639><c> of</c><00:14:06.800><c>
• </c><00:14:16.000><c> We</c><00:14:16.160><c> just</c><00:14:16.320><c> thought</c><00:14:16.480><c>
• <00:14:28.160><c> I</c><00:14:28.399><c> was</c><00:14:28.560><c> just</c><00:14:28.800><c> curious.
• :14:14.480><c> if</c><01:14:14.800><c> you</c><01:14:14.880><c> want</c><01:14:15.040><c> to</c><01:14

Transcript Highlights:

• history of<00:14:20.760><c> the</c><00:14:20.839><c> state</c><00:14:21.360><c> as</c><00:14:21.480>
• ><c> done</c><00:14:35.360><c> over</c><00:14:35.520><c> the</c><00:14:35.600><c> last</c><00:14:35.920
• ><00:14:38.120><c> DFL</c><00:14:38.600><c> colleagues</c><00:14:39.240><c> have</c><00:14:39.600><c>
• And<00:14:47.640><c> that</c><00:14:47.800><c> is</c><00:14:47.880><c> exactly</c><00:14:48.400><c> what
• 00:14:57.839><c> my</c><00:14:58.000><c> colleagues</c><00:14:58.400><c> across</c><00:14:59.400><c>

Transcript Highlights:

• you</c><00:14:04.000><c> hear</c><00:14:04.160><c> me</c><00:14:04.399><c> kind</c><00:14:04.560><c>
• c><00:14:06.480><c> um,</c><00:14:06.720><c> we'll</c><00:14:06.959><c> try</c><00:14:07.120><c> to</
• </c><00:14:08.399><c> so</c><00:14:08.639><c> that</c><00:14:08.800><c> we</c><00:14:08.959><c> have,
• 14:18.399><c> after</c><00:14:18.560><c> that,</c><00:14:18.880><c> Paul</c><00:14:19.120><c> Edgar.
• &gt;&gt; Um,<00:14:21.519><c> thank</c><00:14:21.680><c> you</c><00:14:21.839><c> so</c><00:14:22.000

Transcript Highlights:

• [snorts] This<00:14:03.519><c> occurs</c><00:14:03.920><c> because</c><00:14:04.160><c> the</c><00:14
• They only intended<00:14:09.360><c> to</c><00:14:09.600><c> leave</c><00:14:09.839><c> the</c><00:14:
• an intoxicated<00:14:22.240><c> driver</c><00:14:22.560><c> to</c><00:14:22.720><c> leave</c><00:14:
• </c><00:14:24.720><c> This</c><00:14:25.040><c> occurs</c><00:14:25.519><c> because</c><00:14:25.839>
• 14:30.640><c> you</c><01:14:30.800><c> that</c><01:14:31.280><c> do</c><01:14:31.520><c> that.

Bills: HB0026 , HB0042 , HB0067 , HB0069

Committee: House Transportation, Highways & Military Affairs

Transcript Highlights:

• :52.880><c> so</c><00:14:53.120><c> that's</c><00:14:53.279><c> kind</c><00:14:53.399><c> of</c><00:14
• would want<01:14:10.120><c> people</c><01:14:10.440><c> in</c><01:14:10.600><c> your</c><01:14:10.800
• :14:13.719><c> branches</c><01:14:14.639><c> a</c><01:14:14.719><c> little</c><01:14:14.920><c> bit</
• accountability<01:14:16.400><c> and</c><01:14:16.520><c> we</c><01:14:16.679><c> may</c><01:14:16.840
• <01:14:17.360><c> political</c><01:14:17.760><c> parties</c><01:14:18.120><c> but</c><01:14:18.280><c

Committee: Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:

• :14:06.080><c> from</c><00:14:06.240><c> the</c><00:14:06.320><c> fund</c><00:14:06.600><c> have</c>
• ><c> about</c><00:14:07.360><c> 2</c><00:14:07.480><c> and</c><00:14:07.600><c> 1/2%</c><00:14:08.240
• activities<00:14:13.400><c> of</c><00:14:13.520><c> 8%</c><00:14:14.440><c> in</c><00:14:14.560><c>
• c> and</c><00:14:24.240><c> then</c><00:14:24.360><c> I'll</c><00:14:24.440><c> spend</c><00:14:24.680
• </c><00:14:38.400><c> principles</c><00:14:38.960><c> that</c><00:14:39.280><c> we</c><00:14:39.400><

Bills: HF3900 , HF1849

Committee: House Rules and Legislative Administration

Transcript Highlights:

• providers<00:14:31.760><c> are</c><00:14:32.000><c> actually</c><00:14:32.360><c> providing</c><00:14
• ><c> spending</c><00:14:47.520><c> is</c><00:14:47.640><c> in</c><00:14:47.680><c> managed</c><00:14:
• So<00:14:49.200><c> each</c><00:14:49.440><c> managed</c><00:14:49.760><c> care</c><00:14:50.000><c>
• fraud and<00:14:54.800><c> refer</c><00:14:55.000><c> suspected</c><00:14:55.720><c> fraud</c><00:14
• to law enforcement.<00:14:57.360><c> So</c><00:14:57.440><c> just</c><00:14:57.640><c> like</c><00:14

Committee: House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• :01.199><c> um</c><00:14:01.480><c> same</c><00:14:01.800><c> type</c><00:14:01.959><c> of</c><00:14:
• c> later</c><00:14:09.000><c> we</c><00:14:09.120><c> have</c><00:14:09.199><c> a</c><00:14:09.320><c
• c><00:14:16.040><c> level</c><00:14:16.320><c> that</c><00:14:16.440><c> we</c><00:14:16.560><c> go</
• optional<00:14:31.320><c> if</c><00:14:31.480><c> they</c><00:14:31.680><c> have</c><00:14:31.800><c>
• 01:14:27.880><c> and</c><01:14:28.040><c> so</c><01:14:28.320><c> we</c><01:14:28.560><c> we</c><01:14

Summary: The House Finance Division III held an informational hearing on Medicaid, Medicare, Choices for Independence, and related financing, while postponing nursing facility financing and the county cap discussion to a later date. DHHS officials Ann Landry, Jonathan Ballard, and Medicaid Director Henry Litman provided an overview of Medicaid’s role, noting it is a federal-state partnership with state-specific eligibility and benefits, and emphasizing that Medicaid is a major funding and programmatic support for other DHHS initiatives. They also distinguished Medicaid from Medicare and explained that Medicaid funding is not the same as grant funding, though some providers may also receive federal grants through other channels. The presentation focused on New Hampshire’s relatively small Medicaid program and why it differs from national averages. Officials said about 184,000 residents are covered, roughly one in seven Granite Staters compared with one in five nationally, and attributed the difference largely to the state’s higher per-capita income and older population. They highlighted that about 65% of Medicaid-enrolled adults in New Hampshire are working, that only 22% of births are covered by Medicaid versus 42% nationally, and that the state’s uninsured rate is lower than the national rate. Members asked about covered services, income limits, federal matching rates, and the names of optional eligibility groups; staff explained that New Hampshire offers the optional groups discussed, with matching rates varying by category, including 90% for Granite Advantage and certain other groups, and 65% for children above the required level. A substantial portion of the hearing covered eligibility rules and recent policy changes. Officials reviewed the history of Medicaid, including HCBS waivers, the CFI program, Katie Beckett, the Olmstead decision, the ACA, and the end of continuous enrollment after the public health emergency. They also discussed the 2023 legislative expansion of postpartum coverage from 60 days to 12 months and child eligibility changes. In response to questions, DHHS said it is tracking utilization and costs for the postpartum expansion and reported that many maternal deaths occur after the prior 60-day coverage period, often involving substance use disorder or suicide; they said the longer coverage is intended to improve access to treatment and prevention. The committee also walked through household-income examples, clarified that Medicaid eligibility is based on household income and categorical rules, and confirmed that Granite Advantage ends at 138% of the federal poverty level unless another categorical basis applies. No votes were taken, and the hearing remained informational.

Transcript Highlights:

• and</c><00:14:06.800><c> let's</c><00:14:07.079><c> be</c><00:14:07.240><c> more</c><00:14:07.519><c
• </c><00:14:15.360><c> a</c><00:14:15.519><c> wave</c><00:14:15.959><c> of</c><00:14:16.519><c> uh</c>
• uh<00:14:17.920><c> uh</c><00:14:18.040><c> Fork</c><00:14:18.360><c> on</c><00:14:18.480><c> the</c
• c><00:14:36.240><c> we</c><00:14:36.399><c> we</c><00:14:36.519><c> should</c><00:14:36.759><c> sort<
• 14:10.840><c> uh</c><02:14:11.360><c> thank</c><02:14:11.520><c> you</c><02:14:11.679><c> Mr</c><02:14

Transcript Highlights:

• Solutions to report<00:14:14.959><c> on</c><00:14:15.000><c> a</c><00:14:15.040><c> number</c><00:14
• And<00:14:17.480><c> first</c><00:14:17.760><c> up</c><00:14:17.920><c> we</c><00:14:18.120><c> have<
• </c><00:14:20.040><c> on</c><00:14:20.160><c> Homelessness</c><00:14:20.640><c> and</c><00:14:20.760>
• wanted</c><00:14:40.839><c> to</c><00:14:40.920><c> make</c><00:14:41.079><c> sure</c><00:14:41.240>
• ><00:14:43.400><c> our</c><00:14:44.200><c> our</c><00:14:44.400><c> office</c><00:14:44.680><c> does

Bills: SB2479 , SB2557 , SB2861 , SB3204 , SB3324 , SB3325

Committee: House Human Services & Homelessness

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several measures related to criminal procedure, homelessness, family resilience, Medicaid-funded services, and school Medicaid reimbursement. On SB 2479 SD2, the Judiciary testified in neutral opposition with concerns that the bill could require imprisonment even for probation-eligible defendants, expand sentence reconsideration in ways that could undermine finality for victims, conflict with existing sentencing statutes, and require additional judicial resources. The Office of the Public Defender supported the bill’s intent but asked for language changes so people serving sentences could raise the new evidence in Rule 40 petitions and so probation would remain available in appropriate felony cases. Written testimony also included opposition from several county prosecutors and police, and support from the Office of Hawaiian Affairs. The chair later deferred SB 2479 SD2, citing unintended consequences and problems with the bill. For SB 2557 SD1, which would require annual reporting by the State Office on Homelessness and Housing Solutions, the office said it supported the intent but noted it already produces annual and quarterly reports, that some requested data is already available, and that staffing and cost constraints could make the new reporting burdensome. The State Council on Mental Health supported the measure and suggested narrowing the reporting language to data on individuals with serious mental illness or co-occurring behavioral health conditions, to the extent practicable and in collaboration with relevant agencies. A committee member asked about the availability of point-in-time count data, and the office explained that some figures may not be available every year and may need to be generated through HMIS. Dr. Jack Lewin testified in support, saying the data would be useful for understanding health care costs. The committee passed SB 2557 SD1 with amendments, including a deferral of the effective date. The committee also heard SB 2861 SD2 and SB 3204 SD1, both family resilience pilot program measures. For SB 2861 SD2, the Office of Wellness and Resilience and DHS supported the bill but requested amendments to clarify that the office’s role is planning and advisory, that DHS is a key partner, and that federal compliance safeguards are included. The chair raised concerns about overlap with DHS’s existing Ka Ohana program and asked for language to avoid redundancy while allowing the bill to cover other at-risk children; decision-making was deferred to the next hearing. For SB 3204 SD1, which would create a peer-navigator-based family resilience pilot, the Office of Wellness and Resilience and DHS supported the measure, with the office requesting a two-year pilot period, and both agencies and several advocacy groups submitted support. The committee discussed funding, the proposed five peer navigators, and whether the pilot should be limited to one or two geographic areas; no final action was taken in the portion provided. The committee also heard and supported SB 3324 SD1 on Medicaid home and community-based services, with the Department of Health emphasizing caregiver shortages and the cost-effectiveness of community care, and SB 3325 SD1 HD1 on public school Medicaid reimbursement, where DOE and the Attorney General requested clarifying amendments to reporting language and position titles.

Transcript Highlights:

• There is a form<00:14:02.639><c> that</c><00:14:02.880><c> an</c><00:14:03.040><c> applicant</c><00:14
• :14:05.760><c> waiver</c><00:14:06.160><c> of</c><00:14:06.320><c> any</c><00:14:06.560><c> of</c><00
• Oh, excuse me.<00:14:41.839><c> Um</c><00:14:42.240><c> it</c><00:14:42.480><c> is</c><00:14:42.959><
• c> if</c><00:14:43.199><c> it's</c><00:14:43.440><c> a</c><00:14:43.600><c> legal</c><00:14:44.000><c
• </c><00:14:51.199><c> to</c><00:14:51.600><c> do</c><00:14:52.000><c> what</c><00:14:52.320><c> is</c

Summary: The committee began with routine business, including the Pledge of Allegiance, approval of the minutes, seating of an alternate member, and approval of the consent agenda. It then took up Department of Health and Human Services Rule 25188 on New Hampshire Early Childhood and Out-of-School Time Credentials. Staff explained that the rule adopts two new parts to implement RSA 170E:50, which had long required rules. The main issue was an unclear comment created by changes in the department’s amended conditional approval request: language defining out-of-school-time basics and a requirement tied to the New Hampshire Professional Registry training transcript had been removed, creating a mismatch between the form and the rule text. The department said it revised the language so the form and rule now match. A member also asked about the fee schedule, and the department said the fees are sufficient and supported in part by federal funds. The committee then approved Rule 25188 as amended, with oral edits, on a voice vote. The committee next considered Department of Environmental Services Rule 25206, dealing with subsurface wastewater rules and an administrative fine schedule. Staff said most comments had been addressed, but one remaining issue concerned the fine schedule because the prior interim rule had expired years ago. Staff also noted public concerns about septic tank replacement sizes, but pointed to waiver provisions and replacement-in-kind language that would still allow smaller existing systems to be replaced under certain conditions. DES officials explained that the rule package adds the fine schedule into the program rules and that no fines have been brought under these expired provisions for many years. They also described the waiver and grandfathering provisions as intended to protect existing systems and seasonal campgrounds from unnecessary upgrades. A public witness, Christopher Albert, testified that two sections of the rule would harm manufactured home parks and cooperatives. He argued that the new “two people per bedroom” assumption and the minimum bedroom threshold for using water-meter data would inflate design flows, make water-meter data unusable, and increase costs for low-income residents. Committee members questioned both the witness and the agency about the assumptions. DES staff responded that the two-person-per-bedroom standard is meant for individual on-site system design, not citywide planning, and that water-meter data is only useful in larger or unusual facilities. They said the rule still allows flexibility through waivers and grandfathering for existing uses, and that the drinking-water rule cited by the witness was not the correct comparison. No final vote on Rule 25206 was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• :32.440><c> in</c><00:14:32.600><c> the</c><00:14:32.839><c> report</c><00:14:33.480><c> I</c><00:14:
• <c> spent</c><00:14:37.920><c> a</c><00:14:38.040><c> lot</c><00:14:38.199><c> of</c><00:14:38.399><c
• 00:14:43.079><c> on</c><00:14:43.320><c> that</c><00:14:43.720><c> because</c><00:14:43.880><c> I</c>
• <00:14:45.079><c> like</c><00:14:45.320><c> oh</c><00:14:45.440><c> I'm</c><00:14:45.560><c> not</c><
• ><c> uh</c><00:14:51.720><c> uh</c><00:14:52.639><c> backup</c><00:14:53.639><c> uh</c><00:14:54.199>

Summary: The House Election Law Subcommittee met to review its report and vote on eight bills concerning voter registration, absentee voting, domicile qualifications, photographic identification, and related election procedures. The chair explained that the subcommittee’s mission was to consolidate and reconcile the bills, review constitutional and federal-law issues, and issue recommendations. Members thanked the chair, legislative staff, and outside contributors for the report and supporting materials, including research memos and testimony. The report was expected to be formally issued later in the week, with the bill recommendations finalized at the meeting. The subcommittee first voted on House Bill 27, relative to absentee ballots, where members discussed a proposed bipartisan follow-up bill to clarify language for voters in jail and correctional facilities. The bill was recommended ought to pass by a 3-2 vote. House Bill 289, on domicile qualifications for voting, and House Bill 323, requiring government-issued photographic identification to vote, were both retained by unanimous 5-0 votes. House Bill 385, concerning a prior voting law, was recommended inexpedient to legislate by a 3-2 vote after members cited constitutional concerns and cost. House Bills 418, 618, and 684 were each recommended inexpedient to legislate unanimously, with members saying the subcommittee was consolidating overlapping bills into one measure per topic. The final bill, House Bill 686, requiring identification when requesting an absentee ballot, was retained unanimously for further work over the summer and review by the full Election Law Committee in November. After completing all eight votes, members said the process helped them better understand the issues and that there was substantial bipartisan agreement on many principles, even where they differed on implementation. The meeting concluded with thanks and no further action beyond the subcommittee recommendations.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:14:08.120><c> weekend</c><00:14:08.519><c> Duty</c><00:14:08.959><c> which</c><00:14:09.120><
• only<00:14:14.880><c> one</c><00:14:15.880><c> um</c><00:14:16.320><c> began</c><00:14:17.000><c> on
• ><c> so</c><00:14:19.600><c> the</c><00:14:19.680><c> our</c><00:14:19.880><c> three</c><00:14:20.160
• they<00:14:23.160><c> serve</c><00:14:23.560><c> 9</c><00:14:23.839><c> to</c><00:14:24.000><c> one<
• :14:54.159><c> of</c><01:14:54.639><c> where</c><01:14:54.840><c> we</c><01:14:55.040><c> we</c><01:14

Committee: House Criminal Justice and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:

• <c> house</c><00:14:02.639><c> there</c><00:14:03.199><c> and</c><00:14:03.360><c> so</c><00:14:03.680
• :04.079><c> be</c><00:14:04.480><c> very</c><00:14:05.079><c> um</c><00:14:05.320><c> viable</c><00:14
• c> and</c><00:14:13.079><c> then</c><00:14:13.240><c> I'm</c><00:14:13.320><c> going</c><00:14:13.440
• 14:57.360><c> it</c><00:14:57.480><c> the</c><00:14:57.639><c> 30%</c><00:14:58.279><c> thing</c> is
• since 2020<01:14:47.520><c> nearly</c><01:14:48.000><c> 14%</c><01:14:48.760><c> of</c><01:14:48.840>

Committee: Senate Housing and Homelessness Prevention

Transcript Highlights:

• , and<00:14:34.639><c> that's</c><00:14:34.720><c> in</c><00:14:34.880><c> the</c><00:14:35.040><c> clean
• That would<00:14:36.399><c> be</c><00:14:36.560><c> page</c><00:14:36.959><c> 44</c><00:14:37.519><c>
• :14:45.680><c> be</c><00:14:45.839><c> to</c><00:14:46.079><c> require</c><00:14:46.399><c> the</c> would
• Uh,<01:14:13.920><c> House</c><01:14:14.239><c> File</c><01:14:15.239><c> 2563</c><01:14:16.239><c> as
• </c><01:14:41.120><c> Uh</c><01:14:41.440><c> and</c><01:14:41.600><c> these</c><01:14:41.840><c> are

Bills: HF2563

Committee: House Legacy Finance

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, with<00:14:18.959><c> the</c><00:14:19.120><c> 1.4</c><00:14:19.600><c> four</c><00:14:19.839><c>
• ><c> do</c><00:14:27.680><c> that</c><00:14:27.920><c> to</c><00:14:28.160><c> make</c><00:14:28.320>
• <00:14:32.240><c> reduce</c><00:14:32.720><c> our</c><00:14:33.120><c> total</c><00:14:34.320><c> u</
• </c><00:14:35.440><c> it</c><00:14:35.600><c> comes</c><00:14:35.760><c> to,</c><00:14:36.399><c> you
• </c><00:14:55.600><c> and</c><00:14:55.680><c> we're</c><00:14:55.839><c> dealing</c><00:14:56.000><c

Committee: House Health Services

Transcript Highlights:

• :14:06.639><c> did</c><00:14:06.800><c> it</c><00:14:06.959><c> have</c><00:14:07.160><c> any</c> the
• :14:07.800><c> the</c><00:14:07.920><c> houses</c><00:14:08.399><c> then</c><00:14:08.839><c> ability
• c> and</c><00:14:14.680><c> was</c><00:14:14.839><c> sworn</c><00:14:15.240><c> in</c><00:14:15.880><
• </c><00:14:30.560><c> contest</c><00:14:30.880><c> in</c><00:14:31.120><c> court</c><00:14:31.800><c>
• and it has<00:14:32.240><c> no</c><00:14:32.519><c> impact</c><00:14:32.839><c> on</c><00:14:32.959>

Transcript Highlights:

• Um<00:14:04.480><c> this</c><00:14:04.800><c> has</c><00:14:04.959><c> not</c><00:14:05.120><c> been<
• Um,<00:14:07.279><c> I</c><00:14:07.600><c> think</c><00:14:07.760><c> this</c><00:14:08.720><c> uh</
• uh<00:14:14.240><c> far</c><00:14:14.720><c> far</c><00:14:14.720><c> far</c><00:14:15.440><c> worse
• </c><00:14:15.839><c> than</c><00:14:17.040><c> uh</c><00:14:17.519><c> what</c><00:14:17.839><c> any
• Uh you'll see many<00:14:24.000><c> of</c><00:14:24.160><c> the</c><00:14:24.320><c> people</c><00:14

Committee: House Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:

• I<00:14:26.320><c> hope</c><00:14:26.520><c> that</c><00:14:27.280><c> this</c><00:14:27.440><c> is</
• 14:32.000><c> in</c><00:14:32.120><c> it.
• ><c> in</c><00:14:37.200><c> the</c><00:14:37.280><c> Star</c><00:14:37.520><c> Tribune.
• State your point<00:14:45.880><c> of</c><00:14:45.959><c> order.</c><00:14:46.440><c> Mr.
• Please<00:14:53.920><c> keep</c><00:14:54.120><c> the</c><00:14:54.200><c> topic</c><00:14:54.680><c>