Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> off</c><00:49:02.760><c> from</c><00:49:03.000><c> our</c><00:49:03.599><c> um</c><00:49:04.160>
• :07.200><c> I</c><00:49:07.280><c> think</c><00:49:07.440><c> what</c><00:49:07.559><c> we</c><00:49:
• ><c> you</c><00:49:12.720><c> off</c><00:49:12.839><c> the</c><00:49:13.000><c> top</c><00:49:13.119>
• the buffer<00:49:20.000><c> zone</c><00:49:20.799><c> and</c><00:49:21.720><c> the</c><00:49:21.880>
• 49:24.079><c> camping</c><00:49:24.400><c> in</c><00:49:24.520><c> their</c><00:49:24.680><c> own</c>

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The hearing began with HB 1113, which would create an intensive mobile team pilot program in the Department of Health for chronically houseless individuals with serious brain disorders such as schizophrenia. The Department of Health Adult Mental Health Division strongly supported the bill, and written support was also submitted by several health and harm-reduction organizations. Members asked about the program’s size and coordination with existing services; the testifier said the team would use a low-caseload, 24/7 mobile model, coordinate with police, ERs, hospitals, housing, dual-diagnosis treatment, and other case-management resources, and continue serving participants even if they cycle through jail or hospital. The committee amended the bill to change the participant language from a maximum of 40 to “at least 40,” blanked out the appropriations section, deferred the effective date to July 1, 3000, and then adopted the chair’s recommendation to pass with amendments by unanimous vote in both committees. The next measure, HB 1140, would appropriate funds for DLNR to clean up homeless encampments on department lands. DLNR testified in support, saying it conducts about 22 to 24 cleanups per year and the bill would help it address homelessness statewide. Members asked whether the funds would be used to sweep people out of areas; DLNR said its practice is to give notice, allow time to leave, and then clean up what remains, with storage procedures for personal property. The department also said people still present are told to move to the county area across the road. DLNR confirmed the bill is not in the governor’s budget, though it is in the governor’s legislative package. The committee then heard HB 1486, which would make it disorderly conduct to remain or loiter within 20 feet of a bus stop without intent to use bus services. The Office of the Public Defender opposed the bill, arguing that criminal enforcement is not the right tool, could lead to arrests of people who are simply tired or unhoused, and could create a cycle of repeated low-level cases and constitutional issues around questioning and intent. HPD supported the bill, saying officers would generally try to get people to move first, but could also use field questioning, citations, or arrests depending on the circumstances; HPD said such incidents can be documented and later used in ACT or other mental-health interventions. A private resident testified in support, describing bus stops near her home as occupied overnight and burdening nearby residents and small businesses. Written support came from the City and County of Honolulu Mayor’s Office, and one individual opposed the bill. Members also asked about neighbor-island impacts, property handling, and whether the bill could help connect people to services; HPD said it had not consulted other counties and would follow up. Finally, the committee began hearing HB 877, which would prohibit encampments within 100 feet of the property line of a K-12 public or private school or school facility. DLNR stood on its written testimony, and the Department of the Attorney General raised concerns that the bill did not specify how violators would be removed, what would happen to property or the encampment, or whether the buffer zone applies only to public spaces. The AG suggested making violations petty misdemeanors and adding clearer definitions and due-process guidance. Members asked whether charter schools are included and whether private-property situations within the buffer zone should be clarified; the AG said public schools include charter schools and indicated the bill may need more specificity about private property and trespass situations.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:49:04.320><c> Chair,</c><00:49:05.160><c> Senator</c><00:49:05.600><c> Bahr,</c><00:49:06.480
• build<01:49:01.200><c> um</c><01:49:01.880><c> Oh,</c><01:49:02.000><c> in</c><01:49:02.200><c> this<
• ><c> leave</c><01:49:03.880><c> it</c><01:49:04.000><c> up</c><01:49:04.120><c> to</c><01:49:04.200><
• 01:49:07.360><c> shelter</c><01:49:07.960><c> or</c><01:49:08.160><c> a</c><01:49:08.240><c> hardened
• <01:49:20.280><c> and</c><01:49:20.360><c> expand</c><01:49:21.000><c> to</c><01:49:21.120><c> meet</

Committee: Senate State and Local Government

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um<00:49:01.599><c> uh</c><00:49:01.680><c> I</c><00:49:02.000><c> have</c><00:49:02.160><c> some</c>
• ><c> the</c><00:49:04.559><c> user</c><00:49:05.040><c> friendliness</c><00:49:06.160><c> of</c><00:49
• c> have</c><00:49:13.680><c> a</c><00:49:13.839><c> lot</c><00:49:13.920><c> of</c><00:49:14.079><c>
• </c><00:49:17.119><c> found</c><00:49:17.440><c> them</c><00:49:17.760><c> very</c><00:49:18.079><c>
• > think</c><00:49:28.559><c> that</c><00:49:28.640><c> ought</c><00:49:28.720><c> to</c><00:49:28.800

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee met with a quorum, approved the June 10 minutes, and then handled a routine agenda of contracts and agreements. It deferred one Kentucky Educational Television contract to the August 2025 meeting because the vendor was not registered with the Secretary of State, and then approved the remaining routine items on the PSC green list and related contract lists without objection. The most detailed discussion involved two personal service contracts for the Kentucky Employees Health Plan. Officials from the Personnel Cabinet and Department of Employee Insurance explained that the contracts were designed to identify claims errors and overspending, with vendors paid a percentage of validated savings recovered for the plan. Senators asked how the savings were calculated and whether the contracts had changed plan processes; staff said the contracts had produced realized savings, some errors had been corrected going forward, and the vendors report quarterly. The committee approved those contracts. The committee then took up a retroactive Kentucky Higher Education Assistance Authority contract for a customized College Info Road Show bus. Members questioned why the contract was being presented months after execution, why it involved an out-of-state vendor, and whether the purchase was reasonable and timely. KHEAA staff said the delay stemmed from the need to finalize sustainability and safety details after the RFP, and acknowledged internal process and staffing issues. Several members criticized the retroactive approval process and said they could not validate the purchase from the information provided, but the committee ultimately approved the contract after debate. A final KHEAA discussion focused on the purpose and value of the mobile outreach bus. Staff said the bus supports college and financial aid outreach, especially in rural areas, and has been used for 26 years. Some members questioned the return on investment and whether the state should rely more on broadband and remote outreach, while others supported the program as a way to reach students and families. The committee approved the KHEAA contract, with Senator Douglas voting no and explaining concerns about whether such outreach programs are the proper role of government and whether they are the best use of public funds.

Transcript Highlights:

• 49:14.000><c> whether</c><00:49:14.960><c> that</c><00:49:15.359><c> entity</c><00:49:15.760><c> or</
• ><c> has</c><00:49:16.880><c> any</c><00:49:17.119><c> sort</c><00:49:17.280><c> of</c><00:49:17.520>
• Um, another<00:49:33.200><c> area</c><00:49:33.520><c> for</c><00:49:33.680><c> the</c><00:49:33.839>
• ><00:49:42.160><c> how</c><00:49:42.640><c> you</c><00:49:42.960><c> may</c><00:49:43.359><c> want</c
• to narrow<00:49:44.880><c> or</c><00:49:45.200><c> more</c><00:49:45.599><c> define</c><00:49:46.319

Committee: Senate Judiciary and Public Safety

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It<03:49:04.720><c> aligns</c><03:49:05.120><c> our</c><03:49:05.359><c> policies</c><03:49:05.760><c
• <03:49:21.040><c> alongside</c><03:49:21.680><c> Senators</c><03:49:22.080><c> Kwell</c><03:49:22.640
• 49:30.000><c> to</c><03:49:30.160><c> his</c><03:49:30.399><c> retirement</c><03:49:31.120><c> last</
• ><c> to</c><03:49:40.479><c> one</c><03:49:40.640><c> of</c><03:49:40.720><c> the</c><03:49:40.960><c
• dams</c><03:49:47.040><c> on</c><03:49:47.199><c> the</c><03:49:47.359><c> Elwa</c><03:49:47.840><c>

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Tuesday, December 9, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Myers<00:49:00.240><c> in</c><00:49:00.480><c> the</c><00:49:00.720><c> audience</c><00:49:01.280><c>
• 49:02.319><c> and</c><00:49:02.480><c> comment</c><00:49:02.800><c> on</c><00:49:03.200><c> section</
• </c> Mr.<00:49:18.960><c> Meyer,</c><00:49:19.440><c> welcome</c><00:49:19.599><c> to</c><00:49:19.760
• </c><00:49:30.000><c> and</c><00:49:30.400><c> I</c><00:49:30.640><c> will</c><00:49:30.800><c> just<
• in</c><00:49:34.160><c> our</c><00:49:34.400><c> system</c><00:49:34.720><c> right</c><00:49:34.960><

Committee: Senate Finance

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:49:01.599><c> in</c><00:49:01.760><c> the</c><00:49:01.920><c> body</c><00:49:02.079><c> and<
• c> have</c><00:49:03.760><c> an</c><00:49:03.920><c> AED</c><00:49:04.319><c> in</c><00:49:04.480><c>
• :49:06.800><c> which</c><00:49:07.359><c> um</c><00:49:07.440><c> is</c><00:49:07.680><c> a</c> room
• </c><00:49:08.319><c> for</c><00:49:08.480><c> an</c><00:49:08.640><c> AED</c><00:49:09.280><c> and</
• > we</c><00:49:36.800><c> all</c><00:49:36.960><c> know</c><00:49:37.040><c> what</c><00:49:37.200><c

Bills: HB0076 , HB0102 , HB0115

Committee: House Education

Keywords: annexation, landowner rights, municipal law, city planning, property, local government, artificial intelligence, synthetic sexual material, child protection, self-harm, criminal liability, cardiac emergency, defibrillator, school safety, training, public health, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• :49:13.639><c> a</c><01:49:14.159><c> door</c><01:49:15.159><c> it</c><01:49:15.280><c> would</c> too
• </c><01:49:15.960><c> I</c><01:49:16.080><c> had</c><01:49:16.199><c> to</c><01:49:16.400><c> set</c>
• <01:49:16.639><c> it</c><01:49:16.800><c> all</c><01:49:16.960><c> up</c><01:49:17.360><c> um</c><01:
• it<01:49:18.239><c> was</c><01:49:18.400><c> pretty</c><01:49:18.599><c> challenging</c><01:49:19.280
• 49:24.880><c> as</c><01:49:25.320><c> uh</c><01:49:25.440><c> in</c><01:49:25.599><c> that</c><01:49:

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The hearing focused on HB 563, which would revise the education funding formula for pupils receiving special education services by replacing the current single special education amount with three differentiated categories. Representative Rick Ladd, the prime sponsor, said the bill largely tracks a House-passed version from the prior session with minor figure adjustments, and explained that the proposal uses projected FY26 amounts for three categories based on time in general education versus more intensive placements. He also noted that the bill does not address catastrophic aid directly, but that special education aid, CAT aid, and proration all remain issues for later work sessions. Ladd and supporters argued that weighted categories better reflect actual costs and are more sustainable than treating all IEPs the same. Representative Margaret Drye said the approach was one of the best ideas from the education funding subcommittee and urged the committee to support differentiated aid. Representative Ames asked how the category amounts were derived, and Ladd said Category A follows the FY26 base, Category B is a higher weight, and Category C is a still higher weight for more intensive services, though he acknowledged the exact multipliers were developed earlier and could be revisited. He also said the committee would continue discussing whether the weights are appropriate and how they interact with CAT aid. Testimony from Bonnie Dunham strongly opposed the bill. She argued that funding based on placement rather than actual service need would create incentives to move students into more restrictive settings, could stigmatize children with labels such as "Category C," and would undermine the least restrictive environment requirements under federal special education law. She described her son’s experience in inclusive settings as beneficial and said the bill would have penalized the district for serving him there. In response to questions, she said schools and parents should base funding on the child’s actual needs and costs, not on placement, and urged the committee to recommend the bill inexpedient to legislate.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><01:49:01.600><c> This</c><01:49:01.680><c> is</c><01:49:01.760><c> only</c><01:49:01.960><c> for
• within</c><01:49:04.080><c> the</c><01:49:04.160><c> county</c><01:49:04.560><c> but</c><01:49:04.720
• &gt;&gt; Uh<01:49:11.720><c> my</c><01:49:11.880><c> motion</c><01:49:12.240><c> is</c><01:49:12.360>
• &gt;&gt; Senator<01:49:14.680><c> suggests</c><01:49:15.200><c> to</c><01:49:15.400><c> of</c><01:49:
• Seeing<01:49:21.280><c> none,</c><01:49:21.480><c> please</c><01:49:21.760><c> call</c><01:49:21.960>

Keywords: MS Senate Floor - 5 March, 2026; 10:00 AM, 925, all

Transcript Highlights:

• 49:26.480><c> would</c><00:49:26.839><c> save</c><00:49:27.200><c> a</c><00:49:27.440><c> lot</c><00:
• ><c> they're</c><00:49:32.359><c> only</c><00:49:32.599><c> there</c><00:49:32.720><c> for</c><00:49:
• /c><00:49:36.680><c> so</c><00:49:36.839><c> you're</c><00:49:37.160><c> investing</c><00:49:37.640><
• c> so</c><00:49:43.319><c> we</c><00:49:43.400><c> are</c><00:49:43.599><c> getting</c><00:49:43.920>
• c> in</c><00:49:50.400><c> love</c><00:49:50.520><c> with</c><00:49:50.680><c> the</c><00:49:50.760><

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: Division 3 opened a work session focused on direct care agencies, with the chair saying the day would center on the Veterans Home and other state hospitals and homes. Members first discussed the upcoming Finance Committee process, including how many bills would be assigned to Division 3, whether they would appear on the House calendar, and how much time would be allowed for each bill. The chair said the division would likely spend about an hour on each bill, then return for a second day of review before making recommendations. Staff later identified three bills expected on the calendar: House Bills 704, 751, and 54. Members also raised a question about the use of educational trust fund money in the budget, but that issue was deferred. The main presentation came from Kim McKay, commandant of the New Hampshire Veterans Home, who described the facility as a long-term care intermediate facility serving eligible veterans. She said the home is licensed for 250 beds, budgeted for 225 veterans, and currently has 135 residents with four more scheduled to arrive. McKay highlighted improvements over the last two years, including a reduction in the admission wait list from more than a year to about three to six months, the creation of an LNA training program, energy-saving and Wi-Fi upgrades, and a new electronic learning management system that will provide mandatory training and continuing education units for staff. She said the home’s long-term goal is to return to a 225-bed census, but staffing remains the biggest hurdle. Members asked about admissions, wait times, staffing, vacancies, and the home’s use of contract nurses. McKay explained that the wait time is measured from the initial application date, not from a completed packet, and that staff now help families gather records and paperwork more quickly. She said the home averages about 45 deaths per year, residents stay about 2.5 years on average, and the vacancy rate is around 35 percent, though some positions are intentionally held open until census grows. She attributed staffing shortages largely to retention problems, citing higher private-sector pay, bonuses, and more flexible hours, and said the home has a handful of contract nurses, mainly on second shift. On finances, she said pharmacy services are contracted, the VA reimburses some medication costs based on disability, and the home is pursuing federal changes to cover high-cost medications and catastrophic disability cases. The discussion also covered the home’s off-book donation account, which is overseen by the state and transferred into the state system when funds are spent.

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> it's</c><00:49:13.599><c> it's</c><00:49:14.000><c> a</c><00:49:14.160><c> bigger</c><00:49:14.480
• It's<00:49:15.440><c> a</c><00:49:15.520><c> it's</c><00:49:15.839><c> the</c><00:49:16.079><c> issue
• </c><01:49:35.520><c> She</c><01:49:35.679><c> was</c><01:49:35.760><c> a</c><01:49:36.000><c> role</
• </c><01:49:45.679><c> her</c><01:49:45.920><c> impact</c><01:49:46.239><c> will</c><01:49:46.480><c>
• Her work reflects<01:49:50.239><c> the</c><01:49:50.480><c> very</c><01:49:50.800><c> best</c><01:49:

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Thursday, May 1, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:49:03.599><c> Chair,</c><00:49:04.000><c> this</c><00:49:04.160><c> one</c><00:49:04.319><c>
• </c><00:49:06.319><c> A2</c><00:49:06.880><c> would</c><00:49:07.200><c> preserve</c><00:49:07.599><c
• ><00:49:20.000><c> provider</c><00:49:20.480><c> has</c><00:49:20.800><c> a</c><00:49:21.040><c> track
• :00.159><c> It</c><01:49:00.400><c> would</c><01:49:00.880><c> allow</c><01:49:01.600><c> a</c><01:49
• In addition<01:49:15.440><c> to</c><01:49:15.679><c> the</c><01:49:16.080><c> shity</c><01:49:16.560>

Keywords: 918, senate, all

Summary: The joint hearing opened with chairs explaining that the program integrity omnibus bill is a combined draft assembled from individual member bills and governor proposals, many of which had already been heard in committee. Members emphasized the compressed end-of-session timeline, said the language was not yet ready for enactment, and invited continued revisions as the bill moves next to judiciary and finance. Several speakers stressed the need for bipartisan collaboration, while also warning that the Legislature must act this session on program integrity rather than defer reforms. The fiscal staff then walked through a spreadsheet showing the bill’s overall budget effects and major provisions. The package includes DHS proposals on transforming human services, market- and receipt-based rate reform, enhanced program and payment integrity, uniform service standards, nursing facility rate changes, ICS reforms, and a repeal/redesign of housing stabilization, along with child care assistance integrity and human services redesign items in DCYF. Staff highlighted that the bill combines multiple sources, including governor proposals and member bills, and noted several items that are also in the supplemental human services budget. Committee discussion focused heavily on prepayment review, remote supports, ICS, and provider accountability. Chairs said the bill would codify prepayment review with a 60-day notice requirement after providers were caught off guard by prior rollout, and that remote supports and ICS language were placeholders or under active debate. One member argued the system needs stronger standards but cautioned against harming compliant providers, while another urged the committee to learn from good providers and warned against repeating failed implementations. Staff also reviewed thematic indexes covering billing and service delivery oversight, EVV, administrative reform, licensing and background studies, provider enrollment, sanctions, and child care provider compliance training. No formal votes were taken in the portion provided. The hearing ended with staff beginning the index walkthrough and members indicating that posted amendments would be considered as the bill advances through the remaining committees.

Transcript Highlights:

• Now, unfortunately,<00:49:33.440><c> we've</c><00:49:33.680><c> seen</c><00:49:33.839><c> in</c><00:49
• ><c> attention</c><00:49:40.720><c> or</c><00:49:40.960><c> is</c><00:49:41.200><c> impaired</c><00:49
• :49:46.480><c> in</c><00:49:46.720><c> the</c><00:49:46.880><c> day</c><00:49:46.960><c> where</c><00
• :49:49.839><c> we're</c><00:49:50.079><c> dealing</c><00:49:50.319><c> with</c><00:49:50.559><c> 10.
• <00:49:56.240><c> pool</c><00:49:56.480><c> of</c><00:49:56.720><c> money</c><00:49:56.960><c> in</c>

Committee: Senate Executive Departments and Administration

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• :15.599><c> bill</c><00:49:16.160><c> and</c><00:49:16.319><c> ordered</c><00:49:16.559><c> same</c><
• House<00:49:19.359><c> Bill</c><00:49:19.680><c> number</c><00:49:20.079><c> 160</c><00:49:20.800><c>
• 160 by Representative Bolton<00:49:22.240><c> with</c><00:49:22.640><c> notice</c><00:49:22.960><c>
• ><00:49:25.119><c> referred</c><00:49:25.359><c> to</c><00:49:25.440><c> the</c> Tuscaloosa County is
• </c><00:49:55.599><c> County</c><00:49:56.079><c> signed</c><00:49:56.480><c> John</c> legislation.

Keywords: 920, all

Summary: The Alabama Senate convened with prayer, the pledge, and a roll call establishing a quorum. Early procedural motions were adopted without objection, including excusing absent senators, dispensing with the prior journal, and allowing bills and committee reports to be introduced throughout the day. The Senate then took up several confirmation reports from the Committee on Confirmations, unanimously confirming Ralph Foster, Andre Harrison, Katie Randall, Donna Jones, and Reetta McCannan to the State Textbook Committee for Social Studies. The chamber also received a favorable report on Senate Bill 174 from the Transportation and Energy Committee, and later adopted a special order calendar from the Rules Committee. On the floor, the Senate passed a series of measures, including SB 104, which requires training for members of certain boards, commissions, and councils under the sunset law but was amended to exclude county and municipal boards; HB 59, a cleanup bill concerning the Certified Public Accountants Board; SB 8, authorizing the Emergency Management Agency to spend public funds on public information; SB 66, changing University of Monavalo board terms and related requirements, with an amendment protecting certain trustees appointed before January 1, 2027; SB 168, codifying limits on a reading technique and emphasizing the science of reading; SB 149, creating a temporary teaching certificate pathway for qualified military veterans; SB 46, adding a special driver’s license designation for individuals with invisible disabilities; and SB 90, addressing seafood dealer licenses and support for domestic seafood producers. Local bills including SB 175 and HB 84, HB 200, HB 201, HB 184, HB 203, HB 204, HB 205, HB 133, HB 134, HB 193, and HB 112 also advanced or passed, with several county-specific measures receiving BR adoption, final passage, and in one case certification. Near the end of the meeting, leadership and members discussed severe weather and contingency plans for the coming week. Budget hearings scheduled for Monday were canceled and moved to Thursday, with the Senate planning to meet Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. if weather permits, or Wednesday if necessary. The Senate also received several House messages referring local bills to committee. The session adjourned after a motion to adjourn until Tuesday, January 27 at 3:00 p.m., with the journal left open to receive House messages.

Transcript Highlights:

• :49:01.280><c> by</c><00:49:01.599><c> mail</c><00:49:02.599><c> they</c><00:49:02.720><c> are</c> if
• uh</c><00:49:04.200><c> the</c><00:49:04.400><c> person</c><00:49:04.760><c> who</c><00:49:04.880><c>
• to pay for the<00:49:07.359><c> mailing</c><00:49:07.880><c> as</c><00:49:08.079><c> well</c><00:49:
• 49:12.280><c> I</c><00:49:12.400><c> think</c><00:49:12.799><c> addresses</c><00:49:13.280><c> a</c>
• but I<00:49:20.000><c> want</c><00:49:20.079><c> to</c><00:49:20.319><c> thank</c><00:49:21.160><c>

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee opened its hearing with a procedural discussion about a forthcoming Monday hearing, and the chair confirmed that any amendment deemed non-germane would be made public in advance and included in the calendar. The committee then took up House Bill 6, which would replace the word “citizen” in the Right-to-Know law with “any person,” allow requesters to specify the format of records, and expressly reference preliminary drafts circulated to a quorum or majority of a public body as disclosable material. The sponsor said the bill was intended to clarify existing law, remove uncertainty after a Rochester-related dispute over requester eligibility, and make records easier to obtain electronically unless doing so would be impossible, unusual, unduly burdensome, or harmful to recordkeeping integrity. Testimony was mixed. Cordell Johnston, speaking for himself as a municipal attorney, opposed most of the bill, especially the requirement that records be delivered electronically or by mail, arguing that out-of-state or out-of-country requests can be fishing expeditions that impose significant burdens on towns and clerks. He said local residents already can obtain records at town hall and that many municipalities voluntarily email records as a courtesy, but should not be required to mail large volumes of material. He also said the preliminary-draft language was unnecessary because such drafts are already covered when circulated to a quorum or majority. Representative Alexander raised concerns about the breadth of “any person,” potential abuse by bad actors, and the cost to municipalities, while Representative Peternell asked about whether the bill should account for nonresident property owners and business owners. The sponsor responded that limiting requesters by residency would not meaningfully stop abuse and said he did not know the bill’s fiscal impact, though he suggested it might improve efficiency. Yil Biset of the ACLU of New Hampshire testified in support of HB 6, calling it a modest and reasonable transparency measure. He said the preliminary-draft language was acceptable and consistent with existing exemption language in the public-meeting and documents statutes, and he said he was not aware of foreign-bot document requests occurring in New Hampshire. He also noted that current law already requires electronic disclosure when records exist electronically and can reasonably be provided that way. No vote or final committee action was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:49:14.480><c> I</c><00:49:14.720><c> have</c><00:49:14.960><c> a</c><00:49:15.200><c> rather<
• :16.720><c> of</c><00:49:16.800><c> my</c><00:49:16.960><c> cities</c><00:49:17.280><c> and</c><00:49
• <00:49:20.720><c> the</c><00:49:20.880><c> staff</c><00:49:21.119><c> that</c><00:49:21.280><c> we</c
• 00:49:25.119><c> and</c><00:49:25.440><c> so</c><00:49:26.319><c> almost</c><00:49:26.640><c> on</c><
• </c><00:49:30.559><c> Um</c><00:49:31.200><c> but</c><00:49:31.440><c> this</c><00:49:31.599><c> is</

Committee: House Transportation Finance and Policy

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:49:12.760><c> reports</c><00:49:13.160><c> as</c><00:49:13.359><c> well</c><00:49:13.960><c> that
• <00:49:15.280><c> here</c><00:49:15.440><c> are</c><00:49:15.640><c> the</c><00:49:15.839><c> themes<
• <00:49:16.680><c> that</c><00:49:16.799><c> we</c><00:49:16.920><c> heard</c><00:49:17.359><c> and</c
• 00:49:29.240><c> it</c><00:49:29.359><c> will</c><00:49:29.599><c> look</c><00:49:29.799><c> like</c>
• </c><00:49:31.720><c> we</c><00:49:32.319><c> published</c><00:49:32.720><c> the</c><00:49:32.839><c>

Committee: House Children and Families Finance and Policy

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• sort</c><00:49:04.160><c> of</c><00:49:04.240><c> summarize</c><00:49:04.720><c> the</c><00:49:04.960
• c> if</c><00:49:12.400><c> you</c><00:49:12.559><c> just</c><00:49:12.640><c> had</c><00:49:12.800><c
• <00:49:14.160><c> get</c><00:49:14.319><c> a</c><00:49:14.559><c> book</c><00:49:14.720><c> which</c>
• have</c><00:49:25.280><c> to</c><00:49:25.359><c> hunt</c><00:49:25.599><c> around</c><00:49:25.760>
• :49:32.720><c> to</c><03:49:32.880><c> do</c><03:49:32.960><c> that</c><03:49:33.120><c> is</c><03:49

Committee: House Science, Technology and Energy

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:49:09.840><c> that</c><00:49:10.000><c> the</c><00:49:10.080><c> resident</c><00:49:10.440><c
• ><c> have</c><00:49:15.320><c> a</c><00:49:15.360><c> cost</c><00:49:15.720><c> in</c><00:49:15.960><
• </c><00:49:31.680><c> to,</c><00:49:31.880><c> so</c><00:49:32.080><c> that</c><00:49:32.480><c> I</c
• </c><00:49:37.160><c> The</c><00:49:37.280><c> trees</c><00:49:37.880><c> I</c><00:49:37.960><c> I</c
• It's a short<00:49:42.880><c> paragraph,</c><00:49:43.320><c> but</c><00:49:43.480><c> it's</c><00:49

Committee: Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:49:06.760><c> is</c><00:49:06.880><c> to</c><00:49:07.079><c> pick</c><00:49:07.240><c> up</c
• ><c> take</c><00:49:12.240><c> it</c><00:49:12.319><c> to</c><00:49:12.480><c> the</c><00:49:12.760><
• ><00:49:15.000><c> decisions</c><00:49:15.440><c> are</c><00:49:15.920><c> made</c><00:49:16.920><c>
• </c><00:49:27.559><c> a</c><00:49:27.760><c> certain</c><00:49:28.160><c> percentage</c><00:49:29.079
• <00:49:41.359><c> a</c><00:49:41.760><c> a</c><00:49:42.240><c> it's</c><00:49:42.359><c> a</c><00:49

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee held a public hearing on House Bill 451, which would create a postconsumer paint stewardship program in New Hampshire. Prime sponsor Representative Karen Ebel described the bill as a bipartisan, broadly supported model based on PaintCare programs used in other states. She said consumers and businesses could drop off leftover paint at participating retailers or municipal household hazardous waste sites, with the paint then collected and recycled by the stewardship organization. She emphasized that the program is intended to reduce landfill disposal, improper dumping, and contamination of groundwater and soil, while also helping municipalities save on hazardous waste handling costs. Members asked several questions about how the program would work and how it would be funded. Ebel explained that the program would be financed by a small fee charged at the point of sale on paint products, not a general sales tax, and that retailers could either list it separately or roll it into the price. She said the fee would cover the Department of Environmental Services’ administrative costs, which were described as minimal, and that the program’s structure was developed with DES and industry input. Questions also addressed whether cans would be recycled and how collected paint would be processed; Ebel said the ACA and PaintCare representatives could provide more detail, but that the paint and containers would be handled through recycling or other approved disposal methods rather than landfilled. Representative Judy Aron, a co-sponsor and chair of the House Environment and Agriculture Committee, testified in support, saying the bill had been developed over several years with stakeholders and would keep toxic paint out of landfills while saving municipalities and taxpayers money. Representative Peter Bixby, the ranking member of Environment and Agriculture, also supported the bill, saying his committee had heard it many times and that it had strong bipartisan enthusiasm. No vote was taken during the hearing.