Video & Transcript : 'predatory funding' :

Page 84 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 19th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • the non-federal share of this work. over 3.9 billion in federal funding and the GCPD.
  • E is asking again this session for additional funds to continue to advance these projects forward.
  • The GCPD projects are not business as usual and will will require new and creative funding tools.
  • The Gulf Coast Protection Trust Fund would provide. a mechanism to collect and grow the funds needed
  • Secondly, extend the financial reach and reduce future funding requirements.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 19th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • per year from state sales tax revenue and depositing those funds directly into the the Texas water fund
  • stream for water and flood funding.
  • That is something that is funded by the Texas Water Fund.
  • funding is needed.
  • So as you know, the new water supply for Texas fund and currently allows funding of certain number of
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Human Services Mar 18th, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, was had worked hard for our community for quite a long time, and, uh, she had fought for funding
  • And so the pilot utilizes existing child welfare funding more efficiently.
  • It's, it's the same funding as if we had a program, but we just don't have one because no one bid on
  • There's not funding, there's not uh contracts, there's not grants related to that.
  • I think there's another 4 that the department is proposing rolling out, uh, or asking for funding for
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs Mar 17th, 2025

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • As such, we are funded accordingly.
  • I had you said funding would be removed.
  • Funding, as far as like the intricacies. of funding.
  • Got you, so it would cause an allocation... or reallocation of funding so more funding into our Texas
  • state funding, state revenue for non-OLS funding that the Texas Military Department has received.
Bills: HB39 , HB227 , HB930 , HB 1078 , HB39 , HB227
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means Mar 17th, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • The total revenue loss from the available school fund would be $1,046,000.
  • And the state highway fund would be $3,139,000. And that same.
  • We received in the lateral road fund last year $38,000. So, it's almost a wash for us.
  • Haroldson's case, again, it's part of our inflow that funds our first responders.
  • . of our districts that are funded by sales and use tax.
Committee: House Ways & Means
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • to state and other public funding.
  • The taxpayer funded lobbying That is the use of public funds by political subdivisions for registered
  • Taxpayer funded lobbying often pits local.
  • Taxpayer-funded lobbyists have used public education funds to support and oppose policies that do not
  • Taxpayer funded lobbying is not a new problem.
Bills: SB 18 , SB 19 , SB18 , SB19 , SB666 , SB688 , SB707 , SB888
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • It says if a municipal library hosts one of these events, they won't get any public funding.
  • Funds from cities and from the state that to be covered by this bill the library must host an event which
Bills: SB18 , SB19 , SB666 , SB688 , SB707 , SB888 , SB 18 , SB 19
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Session (Full Formal with Calendar) Jul 9th, 2026

Massachusetts Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • day, even if you believe that regulation should be limited, let's not contribute valuable taxpayer funds
  • abuse of minors, promoting or marketing of narcotics, drugs, tobacco products, gambling or alcohol, predatory
  • abuse of minors, promoting or marketing of narcotics, drugs, tobacco products, gambling or alcohol, predatory
  • Predatory, unfair, or deceptive marketing practices, or financial harm.
Keywords: 1212, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session 4/29/25 - Part 2

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • c><00:04:34.080><c> the</c> prioritized available funds for the prioritized available funds for the veterans
  • </c><00:04:53.440><c> for</c><00:04:53.600><c> these</c> operational funding for these operational funding
  • </c> Uh and and my my goal is to fully fund Uh and and my my goal is to fully fund those<00:05:21.919
  • I want to express my funded.
  • </c> predatory. We're talking about fraud. predatory. We're talking about fraud.
Keywords: 1183, house
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Floor Session May 22nd, 2026

California House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill will ensure counties can fully utilize available funding, advance viable models, and build
  • This bill will ensure counties can fully utilize available funding, advance viable models, and build
  • It will extend a sunset on the liability fund that has never been touched, and it will make it easier
  • Members, AB 2116, Protect Our Small Businesses from Predatory Lending Act, is a unanimous bipartisan
  • Members, AB 2116, protect our small businesses from predatory lending act is a unanimous bipartisan support
Summary: The Assembly convened, initially lacked a quorum, then completed the roll call and prayer, adopted routine procedural motions, and moved through the daily file with many bills passed and retained or passed outright. Early measures included AB 2417 on community college faculty retirement information, AB 1579 expanding the Children’s Crisis Pilot Program, AB 2041 on emergency medical services reporting, AB 1547 on a UC medical school feasibility study in Kern County, and AB 1552 directing higher education segments to report on civic engagement and democracy education. The body also took up SB 73, an urgency elections-security bill, where supporters argued it would protect ballots, voting systems, and election workers from interference, while opponents said it could be unconstitutional, partisan, and overly restrictive of local and federal investigations. SB 73 passed with urgency and immediate transmittal to the Senate. The Assembly then approved a long series of policy bills, many with unanimous or near-unanimous votes, including AB 1554 on California Earthquake Authority transparency, AB 1584 on civil rights duties at the Air Resources Board, AB 1592 on the California Indian Cultural Center, AB 1629 on direct payment to dentists, AB 1645 on prison visitation physical-contact rules, AB 1688 on foster care notice and accountability, AB 1699 on prescribed and cultural burns, AB 1738 on virtual final inspections for single-family homes, AB 1741 on charging sexual battery during a residential break-in as a wobbler, AB 1802 on mitigation lands endowments, AB 1813 on community renewable energy program changes, AB 1899 creating a youth homelessness prevention office, AB 1904 on a credentialing apprenticeship program, AB 1941 on organized metal theft, AB 2043 on drone-attack prevention for mass gatherings and critical infrastructure, AB 2054 on paid family leave for military relatives, AB 2081 on home-based Medi-Cal care, AB 2116 on predatory lending, AB 2122 limiting bench warrants for vehicle-code infractions, AB 2176 on student housing coordination, AB 2187 on tribal public-contract exemptions, AB 2221 on charitable fundraising processing deadlines, AB 2232 on advance parole hearing reporting, AB 2235 on confidentiality of judges’ home addresses, AB 2250 on cannabis/hemp enforcement cleanup, and AB 2266 on electricity. Most measures were described as support or bipartisan bills and passed with little or no opposition. A few bills drew notable debate or recorded opposition, including AB 1813, AB 2122, and SB 73, though all ultimately passed. After finishing 35 items, the Assembly announced it would return the following week with a much larger file, noted upcoming floor amendment deadlines, and adjourned until Tuesday, May 26 at 1 p.m. A post-adjournment vote change was also recorded, changing Assembly Member Dixon’s vote on AB 2041 from aye to no.
WA
Transcript Highlights:
  • State funds, referred to as the near general fund outlook, include the general fund state account, education
  • Funding for financial aid.
  • State funds per state-funded FTE, and this is using constant dollars.
  • So the pie on the left is just the NGFO funds, so near general fund outlook funds.
  • gets their tuition funded.
Summary: The Postsecondary Education & Workforce Committee held a work session on higher education funding and then public hearings on House Bill 2148 and House Bill 2132. In the work session, OPR staff Kate Henry reviewed enrollment trends, tuition policy, financial aid programs, and funding sources for Washington’s public colleges and universities. Members asked about FTE versus headcount, tuition growth, the Washington College Grant, College Bound, and the Workforce Education Investment Account. Henry explained how state appropriations, tuition, and financial aid interact, and noted that higher education makes up a significant share of the state budget. No votes were taken during the work session. House Bill 2148 would create a “pay-it-forward” graduate student aid program administered by the Student Achievement Council, allowing students to receive tuition support and later make income-based contributions for up to 15 years to fund future students. Sponsor Rep. Reid said the bill is intended to offset the loss of federal graduate loan options and support workforce needs in fields like nursing, teaching, and research. Committee questions focused on repayment terms, possible caps, interest, and program capitalization. Testimony was overwhelmingly supportive, with students and advocates arguing the bill would expand access to graduate education and avoid predatory private debt. House Bill 2132 would limit disclosure and retention of personally identifying and financial information from WASFA applications, generally requiring the Student Achievement Council and institutions to stop retaining that information after one year following the award year unless needed for an audit or appeal. Rep. Leavitt said the bill is meant to reduce unnecessary long-term retention of sensitive student data and improve privacy and security. Supporters, including student leaders and immigrant-advocacy groups, said the bill would protect vulnerable students and increase trust in the aid process. Some members raised concerns about whether shorter retention could affect future record needs, including immigration-related documentation, but the sponsor said students can keep their own records and that the bill preserves audit authority. The hearing ended without a vote, and the chair noted an upcoming busy schedule and cutoff deadlines.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Postsecondary Education & Workforce Jan 14th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Postsecondary Education & Workforce

Transcript Highlights:
  • State funds, referred to as the near general fund outlook, include the general fund state account, education
  • State funds per state-funded FTE, and this is using constant dollars.
  • So the pie on the left is just the NGFO funds, so near general fund outlook funds.
  • funding sources.
  • , existing funding for state, federal, or other funding sources.
Bills: HB2148 , HB2132
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Feb 23rd, 2026

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • population and growing safety concerns, Senate Bill 2143 will allow assessors to use existing state-funded
Summary: The Senate convened, established a quorum, and opened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and several recognitions, including introductions of the psychologist and nurse of the day, a citation for Diesel Fritz’s All-State Choir achievement, and a gallery introduction highlighting fine arts advocates from Norman Public Schools. Members also marked birthdays and read excerpts from George Washington’s first inaugural address in honor of the first president. On floor business, the Senate laid over item number three and then considered several bills. Senate Bill 1191 repealed the unused Oklahoma Energy Initiative Low Carbon Initiative Board and passed 48-0. Senate Bill 1258 clarified open-carry law to expressly allow firearms on boats and vessels on Oklahoma waters and passed 41-7. Senate Bill 1920 raised the salvaged title threshold from 60% to 70% to reflect repair costs and align more closely with neighboring states; it passed 48-0 after brief questioning about consumer benefits. Senate Bill 1936 added falsely impersonating a law enforcement officer, including federal officers, to the list of Class D1 felonies and passed 48-0. Senate Bill 2143, after an amendment restoring the title, authorized assessors to use state-funded aerial images to inspect property changes and included language intended to ensure fair treatment of builders and consistency with assessing standards; it passed 34-13. The chamber then heard announcements about upcoming committee meetings and adjourned until Tuesday, February 24, 2026, at 1:30 p.m.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • federal funding.
  • When will the federal funds be fully expended?
  • The request before you is for one-time funding of $11.8 million in General Fund to support the continuation
  • Okay, I think it's been a lot of General Fund. Yeah.
  • The request will provide one-time funding of $9.75 million from the Business Fees Fund for the continuation
Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on State Administration heard a series of budget change proposals and trailer bill items, beginning with Housing and Community Development (HCD) requests. HCD sought permanent authority for seven existing temporary positions to support the HCD Connect IT system, and a separate proposal to fund implementation of eight 2025 housing-related laws with $4.2 million General Fund and 16 positions, plus $470,000 one-time General Fund. Members asked about how HCD Connect would interact with programs moving to the new Housing Development Finance Committee, and HCD also explained that the estimated cost to implement AB 1053 had been revised downward from about $6 million to $1.9 million because of shared implementation with CalHFA and the new committee structure. The committee also heard a Cal ICH proposal for $339,000 one-time General Fund to implement AB 678 on LGBTQ+ inclusive and culturally competent homelessness services, with testimony emphasizing data gaps and the need for a contract-based approach because HMIS cannot be changed unilaterally. The Department of Financial Protection and Innovation presented three continuation proposals: $15.34 million and 53 positions for the California Consumer Financial Protection Law program, $13.5 million and 51 positions for the Debt Collector Licensing Act program, and $49,000 ongoing for two positions in the broker-dealer/investment adviser education program. Members and the public raised concerns about the size and fairness of debt collector assessments and licensing fees, while DFPI explained the pro rata fee structure, the current license count, and how larger assessments fall on larger firms. Public testimony also supported retaining funding for the Student Loan Empowerment Network and requested funding for a franchise broker registration program. The committee also considered a mandate item involving suspension of a disclosure requirement related to property taxation, and trailer bill language from the Government Operations Agency to amend AB 91 on MENA demographic data collection, with the administration emphasizing data nondisclosure, protection of federal funding, and delayed implementation. The Secretary of State’s office then presented Help America Vote Act funding requests: $10.3 million for VoteCal maintenance and operations and $4.492 million for HAVA spending plans supporting voter education, training, accessibility, auditing, and county assistance. The office also requested $660,000 General Fund to implement AB 1392, which would make voter registration information for elected officials and candidates confidential, and explained the need to modify VoteCal and county election systems. The committee also heard requests to continue the Cal-Access Replacement System with $11.8 million General Fund and to continue the Notary Automation Program Replacement Project with $9.75 million from the Business Fees Fund. Members asked about total project costs, testing, data migration, and the expected November 2026 go-live date for Cal-Access replacement. Votes were taken on the vote-only items once quorum was established, and the committee approved the items considered. The final informational item was an overview from the California Arts Council, which highlighted the agency’s 50th anniversary, its statewide grantmaking, and the economic impact of arts funding. Council staff described Creative Corps, cultural districts, and the role of arts funding in local economies, while members and public witnesses urged increased support, including a request to raise local assistance grant funding to $50 million and to provide additional funding for cultural districts. Testimony emphasized the arts as economic infrastructure, community infrastructure, and a source of civic and cultural vitality across California.
MA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Merchants typically receive credit card funds in their bank accounts within 24 to 48 hours.
  • It's a predatory one that drives up profits for giant Wall Street banks and drives up costs for small
  • It's a predatory one that drives up profits for giant Wall Street banks and drives up costs for small
Summary: The Special Legislative Commission on the future of credit card payments and their impacts on small businesses held what was described as its last public hearing. Chair Paul Feeney opened by noting the commission’s mandate under Chapter 238 of the Acts of 2024 and explained that members would continue working on a final report after the hearing. The meeting featured testimony from banks, payment industry groups, restaurant advocates, convenience store representatives, and others, with repeated discussion of interchange fees, surcharging, fraud, and federal preemption issues. Banking and card-industry witnesses, including the Massachusetts Bankers Association, the Card Coalition, and the Electronic Payments Coalition, argued that state-level interchange restrictions would disrupt a global payment system, create compliance problems, and likely apply only to a small share of transactions because of federal preemption. They emphasized consumer and merchant benefits of cards, the role of banks in absorbing fraud losses, and recent federal and state developments, including Illinois litigation, OCC and NCUA actions, and a settlement that they said would give merchants more flexibility. Several witnesses also suggested alternatives such as vendor compensation for tax collection and modernizing Massachusetts’ surcharge ban. Restaurant and convenience-store advocates took the opposite view, saying swipe fees are a major burden on thin-margin businesses and that merchants should not pay interchange on sales tax or gratuities that are not their revenue. Mass Restaurants United and individual restaurant owners described severe financial strain, rising costs, and the need for transparency and relief. NACS supported swipe fee reform and argued that current fees are excessive and inflationary. A few members questioned witnesses about whether industry should share more of the burden and about the feasibility of changing the current system. No votes or formal policy actions were taken. The chair said the commission would meet again to discuss a draft framework and final report, and members of the public were invited to submit additional written testimony before the commission concludes its work.