Video & Transcript Research : 'harm reduction'
Page 84 of 482
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Recently, at our merit price, we got 15 of our security officers who got laid off and a reduction of
- of our gentorial layoff and reduction of our gentorial team.<00:54:36.720>
The <00:54:36.960>< - If we were to maintain that same $600 per pupil request, this legislation proposes a 31.4% reduction
- $700,000 and budget cuts, reductions $700,000 and budget cuts, reductions that<01:33:00.080>
- That reduction would be a 720,000.
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services (02/10/2026)
Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services
Transcript Highlights:
- and I will support the underlying bill because I can see it as only helping people and in no way harming
- is the amendment to HB 1245. only helping people and in no way only helping people and in no way harming
- anybody<00:17:42.960>
under <00:17:43.200>any <00:17:43.440>circumstances, harming - anybody under any circumstances, harming anybody under any circumstances, no matter<00:17:44.320>
- uh to your weekly for-doll reduction uh to your weekly benefit<01:51:12.880>
amount.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Hearing Senate Emergency Management Committee and Natural Resources and Water Committee May 13th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- or insurable loss reduction.
- Was it a 16% sort of projected risk reduction?
- Just a question: if Cal Fire is doing risk reduction modeling, why do you think SB 326...
- You have to tighten the link between risk reduction and insurance so it's very, very clear.
- We do strongly support a wildfire risk reduction legislative package this year.
Summary:
The joint Senate hearing of the Natural Resources and Water Committee and the Emergency Management Committee focused on wildfire resilience, with members discussing the SB 254 report on enhancing California’s response to natural catastrophes. Opening remarks emphasized the scale of wildfire damage, the need for prevention and preparedness, and concerns about the affordability and insurability crisis. Senators repeatedly contrasted the relatively small share of funding going to community hardening with the much larger amounts spent on utility wildfire mitigation and landscape-scale projects, and several members raised concerns about CEQA delays, one-time funding, and the need for more sustainable, ongoing financing.
The Legislative Analyst’s Office presented an overview showing about $4.7 billion in state wildfire resilience appropriations from 2018-19 through 2025-26, with funding shifting from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund to the General Fund and then to Proposition 4. LAO noted that only about $65 million had been specifically targeted to community hardening, while most funding went to forest health, fuels, research, and related programs. LAO also said one-time funding will decline in coming years and that future GGRF support is uncertain, though General Fund use is not legally precluded. Members asked about maintenance costs, polluter-pays ideas, and whether performance metrics should focus more on property and community risk reduction than acres treated.
Cal Fire’s State Fire Marshal described the state’s community wildfire preparedness strategy, centered on home hardening, defensible space, and neighborhood-scale mitigation. He said roughly 4 million homes are in the wildland-urban interface, most built before modern fire-resistant standards, and argued that the state must move from response to prevention. He said Cal Fire is incorporating the SB 254 recommendations into its updated action plan, has streamlined some fuel-reduction projects under a recent executive proclamation, and is shifting some grant funding toward maintenance of existing treatments. Cal OES described the AB 38 pilot and FEMA hazard mitigation work, saying the pilot helped build tools and standards for home hardening but that federal approval delays remain a major barrier; the agency reported 155 hardened properties, 19 under construction, and 370 assessed and waiting. The Wildfire and Forest Resilience Task Force said it has coordinated more than $6 billion in state and federal investments, is moving toward regional block grants and better data-driven prioritization, and is developing separate community and landscape strategies. The hearing ended with discussion of modeling, data gaps, utility coordination, contractor capacity, and possible legislative or budget changes to better align funding and metrics with community safety outcomes.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Environment and Natural Resources Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm
Joint Committee on Environment and Natural Resources
Transcript Highlights:
- We also support funding for the Toxics Use Reduction Institute and the Office of Technical Assistance
- For urban trees, we are looking at reductions.
- For urban trees, we are looking at reductions.
- It's time for Massachusetts to act to reduce the environmental and human health harms of plastics.
- More than 60 communities in Massachusetts have already done polystyrene reduction policies.
Summary:
The hearing focused on the Healey-Driscoll administration’s Mass Ready Act, a $3 billion environmental bond bill. Administration officials said the bill would fund climate resilience, clean water, land conservation, parks, PFAS remediation, food security infrastructure, and coastal and inland flood protection, while also streamlining permitting for housing, restoration, and other resilience projects. They emphasized that the bond authorizes spending but does not itself obligate it, and said the proposal includes deauthorizations as housekeeping. Committee members asked about the new Resilience Revolving Fund, flood and drought management, MVP funding, land acquisition, Chapter 61 right-of-first-refusal changes, salt marsh carbon sequestration, and how the bill would help smaller municipalities and offset expected federal funding losses. Officials said the revolving fund would be managed through EEA and the Clean Water Trust, with criteria aimed at directing aid to communities most in need, and noted that drought issues would continue to be handled through existing DEP and drought commission tools.
Several committee members and witnesses discussed specific policy provisions, including flood disclosure requirements for homebuyers and renters, expanded authority for regional planning and small-town access to grants, and permitting reforms that would exempt or expedite certain environmental restoration and priority housing projects from more time-consuming review processes. Administration witnesses defended the reforms as a way to achieve the same environmental outcomes faster and with more certainty, while some advocates argued the bill should go further, especially on Chapter 91 and restoration permitting. The administration also described investments in DCR facilities, water and wastewater systems, open space, agricultural easements, and a new focus on blue carbon and salt marsh restoration.
Public testimony largely supported the bill. Mass Audubon, the Trustees of Reservations, the Environmental League of Massachusetts, The Nature Conservancy, MAPC, the Massachusetts Municipal Association, municipal officials, and others praised the bill’s resilience, conservation, and water infrastructure investments. Some witnesses urged additional funding for land protection, coastal resilience, buyouts, and restoration, and several called for stronger or simpler permitting reforms. Municipal witnesses from Boston, Beckett, Beverly, Conway, and regional planning organizations stressed the need for flexible financing, especially for small and rural communities facing costly infrastructure and climate adaptation projects. No votes were taken during the portion of the hearing provided; the committee heard testimony and asked questions before moving on to additional panels.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Senate Energy and Natural Resources (04/08/2025)
Energy and Natural Resources
Transcript Highlights:
- This is a deadly chemical that if you are exposed to it long enough, it will harm you.
- <00:05:06.639>
Uh <00:05:07.039>so <00:05:07.440>so long enough, it will harm - Uh so so long enough, it will harm you.
- <01:12:42.800>
So, <01:12:43.600>um, reductions is far far outpaced. - So, um, reductions is far far outpaced.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- public safety, and make it clear to repeat DWI offenders that they will not be given a second chance to harm
- So again, first, I want to acknowledge the pain and harm and unimaginable loss experienced by survivors
- evidence-based strategies like accessible treatment, like community intervention programs, and other harm
- reduction efforts.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- public safety, and make it clear to repeat DWI offenders that they will not be given a second chance to harm
- So again, first, I want to acknowledge the pain, harm, and unimaginable loss experienced by survivors
- in evidence-based strategies like accessible treatment, community intervention programs, and other harm
- reduction efforts.
Keywords:
community supervision, repeat offenders, intoxication, Texas Penal Code, criminal justice reform, intoxication manslaughter, criminal penalties, mandatory supervision, parole eligibility, Grayson's Law, mental health, trauma, jailers, law enforcement, occupational health, diligent participation, state jail felony, time credits, rehabilitation programs, de-escalation
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Monday, April 28, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- safe and no business that harms safe and no business that harms consumers<02:57:15.920>
should - misuse of technology to harm misuse of technology to harm survivors.<03:30:08.160>
Let <03 - Do no harm to Social Security. Do no harm to Medicare.
- harm. Do no harm to social security. harm. Do no harm to social security.
- Do<07:58:56.558>
no <07:58:57.080>harm <07:58:58.080>to Do no harm to Do no harm
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- For four years, I've been leading the provider efforts on systems improvement and paperwork reduction
- in reimbursement, it's tough reduction in reimbursement, it's tough enough<01:36:25.840>
to <01 - This gives me and paperwork reduction.
- Because of the prevent serious harm.
- <01:45:40.560>
Imagine your child could be harmed. Imagine your child could be harmed.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Floor Session May 27th, 2025
California House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- AB 1338 seeks to protect the communities in my district from harmful air pollution while preserving the
- You can greatly reduce your risk for skin cancer by just wearing clothing that covers you from harmful
- All of which cause long term respiratory harm.
- This is particularly harmful for youth who are in a vulnerable developmental period.
- Are they criminals that cause great harm? Are they people who need to be protected and saved?
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Public Health Jun 21st, 2026 at 09:00 am
Joint Committee on Public Health
Transcript Highlights:
- What is the administration of lethal drugs, if not harm?
- harm of death.
- Assisted suicide harms the doctor-patient relationship.
- People already being harmed in other states.
- People already being harmed in other states.
Summary:
The Joint Committee on Public Health opened its first hearing of the session and heard testimony on bills in three areas: emergency medical services/AED access, athletic training and student safety, and end-of-life options. Committee chairs outlined testimony rules and noted that written testimony would also be accepted. Some bills had no live witnesses, while others drew extensive testimony from advocates, professionals, and legislators.
On AED-related bills, the American Heart Association supported requiring automated external defibrillators at sporting events and athletic fields, citing sudden cardiac arrest survival rates and urging cardiac emergency response plans as an added safeguard. A parks and recreation professional supported AED access but raised concerns about the cost, staffing, maintenance, and feasibility for municipalities with limited resources. Athletic trainers supported expanding their scope of practice and removing workplace restrictions, arguing it would improve injury prevention, reduce costs, and help retain professionals in Massachusetts.
The committee also took extensive testimony on end-of-life options legislation. Supporters included legislators, physicians, hospice volunteers, clergy, patients’ family members, and advocacy groups, who described the bills as allowing terminally ill, mentally capable adults to choose a peaceful death with strict safeguards and self-administration requirements. They emphasized personal stories of suffering, public support, and the claim that other states have not seen abuse. Opponents, including faith-based, disability-rights, and family policy representatives, argued the bills amount to physician-assisted suicide, could pressure vulnerable people, and may be influenced by prognosis errors, coercion, or financial incentives. No votes or final committee actions were taken during the hearing.
AL
Transcript Highlights:
- Property Insurance and Energy Reduction Property Insurance and Energy Reduction Act.
- harm to that person, right? harm to that person, right?
- <01:19:46.800>
harm. - because I caused bodily harm harm. because I caused bodily harm harm.
- harm. That's the key though. harm. That's the key though.
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Legislative Finance May 13th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- You can see the reductions, the vast majority of them under the, the um Energy and Commerce Committee
- One is, uh, a sort of potentially an overall reduction at the federal royalty rate.
- And then the other is a potential overall reduction in the federal royalty rate, which would be sort
- And program managers sit and so if there's a reduction there, then that reduces how much we can push
- I know that Reduction, federal reduction is not available at this point in time, but We, we get a significant
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, but they'll pay for it in a reduction of service. Um.
- It does target the weaponization of anti-Zionism to harm and attack Jewish students.
- And so, so for example they said calling for Aiding or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the
- bad, I mean that's a bad example of anti-Semitism calling for Aiding or justifying the killing or harming
- An example from IHRA, which calls for aiding or justifying the killing or harming of Jews is or is not
Bills:
HB 346, HB 1360, HB 1510, HB 1606, HB 1804, HB 1805, HB 2156, HB 2391, HB 2767, HB 3022, HB 3044, HB 3272, HB 3293, HB 3493, HB 3809, HB 3824, HJR 110, HB 2463
Keywords:
expedited service, business records, veteran-owned businesses, franchise tax, fee schedule, Texas Ethics Commission, election reporting, campaign finance, violation categorization, penalties, public disclosure, Texas Utilities Code, electric utility, retail electric provider, municipally owned utility, electric cooperative, vegetation management, tree trimming, line clearance, transmission line
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
HSH Public Hearing - Thu Feb 5, 2026 @ 9:30 AM HST
Human Services & Homelessness
Transcript Highlights:
- The premium is low, and it gives you that 94% cost share reduction.
- It stands for cost share<00:46:07.520>
reduction. - So, it's a very rich share reduction.
- Reduction, Food Basket, Malama Kauai, and various other nonprofits.
- >
Malama and Harm Reduction, Food Basket, Malama and Harm Reduction, Food Basket, Malama Kauaii
Keywords:
disability, communication access, deaf, hard-of-hearing, deaf-blind, healthcare, sign language interpreters, auxiliary aids, weight loss, GLP-1 drugs, obesity, Medicaid, healthcare costs, 910, house, all
Summary:
The committee heard testimony on HP 1972, which would create a nonrefundable family caregiver tax credit, and on a related tax measure to increase the existing dependent care tax credit. Supporters of HP 1972, including AARP, the Executive Office on Aging, the Hawaii Public Health Institute, Hawaii Children’s Action Network, and others, said unpaid caregivers are essential to keeping kūpuna and other loved ones at home and described significant out-of-pocket costs. The Department of Taxation and the Tax Foundation raised technical concerns, including the need to avoid overlap with existing credits and to prevent double-dipping. The department said taxpayers can claim credits to the extent allowed, but recommended explicit language barring the same costs from being claimed under more than one credit. No vote was taken in the excerpt, and the chair moved the bill along after questions.
The committee then heard HP 1975, which would repeal the sunset on the state rent supplement program for kūpuna. AARP, Catholic Charities Hawaii, the Executive Office on Aging, and others supported making the program permanent, saying it helps low-income older adults avoid eviction and homelessness and allows them to remain in affordable housing. Catholic Charities described clients who were paying unsustainable shares of income for rent before receiving the supplement. Members also shared a constituent example of an elderly retiree who needed the subsidy to stay housed. Written support was noted from additional organizations and individuals.
Next, the committee took up HB 1706, which would expand Medicaid prospective payment reimbursement to include mental health services furnished in federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics by mental health professionals under supervision. The Office of Hawaiian Affairs supported the bill, and DHS said it appreciated the intent to address workforce shortages and expand training, but cautioned that unlicensed professionals cannot currently bill Medicaid and that a state plan amendment would be needed, with limited precedent for approval. Members asked about the likelihood and timing of federal approval and whether the bill could help rural areas; DHS said approval is uncertain and the process can take time, though it saw possible alignment with the state’s rural health transformation efforts. The committee also discussed HB 546, a three-year health coverage continuity pilot program for people losing Medicaid coverage. DHS, the Attorney General’s office, DCCA, Catholic Charities, the University of Hawaii, and others testified, with DHS warning that federal changes could increase uninsured rates and that the state may need to act quickly. Catholic Charities and others emphasized the risk to Medicaid recipients, including homeless and near-elderly residents, while DHS explained the state’s existing premium assistance program for certain immigrants and compared it to the proposed pilot. The excerpt ends during discussion of that comparison, with no vote shown.
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 4/2/25
Public Safety Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:44:58.720>
uh <00:44:58.920>of of of 25 there was a a reduction uh of of of 25 - there was a a reduction uh of cost<00:44:59.440>
of <00:44:59.599>the <00:44:59.720> - look at the the reduction in costs that<00:45:29.240>
were <00:45:29.520>passed <00:45: - It's an appropriate punishment, and it comes with reductions in civil liberties.
- You may have heard recently about the reduction in North Minneapolis in gun violence, particularly in
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- TPWD only has standing to seek an injunction for such harm.
- This bill also creates a high burden of proof for those who are harmed and unnecessarily gives produced
- If there is so much confidence that the water has been cleaned up and will cause no harm, then there
- High levels of PFAS causing significant harm in Johnson County are perfectly legal to the applicant.
- for harm that occurs during abandoned well plugging efforts, which can lead to broken fences, property
Bills:
SB3074, HB49, HB2440, HB3556, HB3619, HB3866, HB4042, HB4112, HB4271, HB4413, HB4426, HB5033, HB49
Keywords:
SB 3074, TCEQ, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Water Code, permit applications, environmental permitting, administrative record, ex parte communications, legislative communications, governor, lieutenant governor, state legislators, district projects, public records, recusal, conflict of interest, substantial interest, agency transparency, environmental regulation, permit renewal
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Conference Committee on HF2431 5/13/25
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:38:39.839>
um the Senate position, the reduction um the Senate position, the reduction - , 30% reduction.
- , 30% reduction.
- , 30% reduction.
- Number nine, Minnesota State Universities, the governor's plan, 41% reduction, 30% reduction.
Summary:
The Higher Education Conference Committee reviewed differences among the Governor’s, House, and Senate proposals for state grant parameter changes and their effects on state grant spending, North Star Promise spending, and average student awards. Nonpartisan staff explained that the proposals use different combinations of parameter changes, with the Governor’s and Senate plans modeled to avoid or minimize rationing, while the House plan would require rationing to balance the program. Staff reported projected biennium balances of a positive $29.836 million for the Governor’s proposal, a negative $60.758 million for the House proposal without rationing, a positive $994,000 for the House proposal with rationing, and a positive $3.623 million for the Senate proposal; North Star Promise balances also varied, with the Senate showing a positive balance and the Governor and House with rationing showing negative balances. Staff also said the Senate proposal would extend availability of the state grant appropriation and suspend surplus procedures through fiscal year 2029, allowing the balance to carry forward.
The committee then focused on the House-only tuition and fee cap provision, which would limit the tuition recognized for state grant purposes for four-year programs to the University of Minnesota Twin Cities level, with 1% annual increases in fiscal years 2026 and 2027. House members said the cap was intended to address rising tuition, especially at the University of Minnesota, and to produce savings in the state grant program. The governor’s office confirmed the provision was not included in the Governor’s bill. Representatives from the University of Minnesota and the Minnesota Private College Council opposed the cap, arguing it would reduce awards for low-income students and shift costs to students rather than address underlying tuition pressures; they also said it could discourage enrollment at higher-cost institutions. Supporters from Minnesota State argued the cap would improve fairness because students at lower-tuition institutions are effectively capped lower, while students at more expensive institutions receive larger awards, and they said the legislature should intervene in a variable that has grown substantially over time.
Committee members questioned how the cap would work and whether it was tied to the Twin Cities campus rate. Testifiers clarified that the state grant formula is tied to the University of Minnesota level, but because Minnesota State institutions are below that level, the cap effectively limits their students to their own lower tuition while allowing higher awards at the University of Minnesota and private colleges. No formal vote or final action was taken in the portion of the meeting provided; the chair indicated the committee would continue with item-by-item review of the remaining parameter changes and hear additional testimony from agencies and institutions.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services (01/22/2025)
Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services
Transcript Highlights:
- This legislation threatens not just to harm individuals, but the moral fabric of New Hampshire.
- This legislation threatens not just to harm individuals, but the moral fabric of New Hampshire.
- because it harms the unions Industries<02:23:30.000>
leading <02:23:30.399>training <02 - We also believe that passing right to work will harm our communities because studies have shown... ..
- 4% reduction in median<03:39:20.479>
wages <03:39:21.479>for <03:39:21.760>those
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Local Government Committee Apr 29th, 2026
Local Government
Transcript Highlights:
- includes strong safeguards: no new construction, no displacement provisions for layoffs, hours reductions
- So, one, the first one is that while it does allow for that reduction, it's really kind of site-specific
- One, while it does allow for that reduction, it's really kind of site-specific as it relates to properties
- We want to protect our locals from harm. We're, this is local government, right?
- We want to protect our locals from harm, right?
Summary:
The committee heard eight bills, with testimony largely focused on local government authority, housing, and public service operations. AB 1658 would make permanent higher change-order thresholds for Santa Clara and Los Angeles counties on large construction projects; county representatives said the existing temporary authority has saved time and money, and the bill passed 6-0. AB 2263 would authorize the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority to develop employee-preference affordable housing on its properties; supporters said it would help retain workers facing extreme housing costs, and it also passed 6-0 as amended.
AB 2134, the Family Friendly City Councils Act, would protect city council members taking parental leave from losing their seats or having absences counted against them. Assembly Member Addis’s designee and Sunnyvale Council Member Alyssa Cisneros described the bill as a response to public pressure and privacy concerns faced by elected parents; members spoke in strong support, and the bill passed 6-0 as amended. AB 2188 would raise Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District’s contracting authority to $250,000 per contract; supporters said it would reduce delays and administrative costs, while questions centered on oversight and bidding safeguards. After committee amendments, it passed 6-0.
AB 1768 would authorize Los Angeles and Contra Costa counties to ask voters to approve a temporary transactions-and-use tax for health care and related services in response to federal funding cuts. Supporters, including community clinics, Planned Parenthood, labor groups, and county representatives, said it would let voters decide whether to backfill major health care losses; opponents argued it would worsen affordability and tax burdens. The committee discussion highlighted concerns about equity and local control, and the bill was placed on call after a 5-2 roll call. AB 2033 would let general law cities use job order contracting for repair and maintenance projects; supporters said it would speed routine work, while AFSCME and some members raised workforce displacement and staffing concerns. It passed 8-0 as amended.
AB 2415 would let the City of Folsom shift some housing obligations away from its historic district to other transit-oriented sites, with supporters saying it preserves historic character while still meeting housing goals. It passed 10-0. AB 2741, heard at the end of the meeting, would give cities a grace period to cure housing element issues involving overlay zones after a court ruling found some HCD-certified overlays noncompliant. Cities and local government groups supported the bill as a fairness measure for jurisdictions that relied on state guidance, while housing advocates and legal aid groups opposed it, arguing it would weaken enforcement and allow noncompliant housing plans to persist.