Transcript Highlights:

• They're very price sensitive and the only way we can have anything to do with price is through taxes.
• only requested to um, But I, if we had 2 full days, I think we could get pretty much through our discussions
• Are you, are we, we're gonna discuss locations or just, just a reminder. Yes, thank you.

Transcript Highlights:

• Is there any discussion? >> Seeing none, all those in favor say I. >> I.
• Uh, we've been holding weekly meetings discussing Senate security with the chiefs of staff, both the
• :04:41.120><c> meetings</c> holding weekly meetings holding weekly meetings um<00:04:43.600><c> discussing
• Senate security with the um discussing Senate security with the chiefs<00:04:45.280><c> of</c><00:04
• The closed session will discuss sensitive security details related to the state capital, House, and Senate

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The Advisory Committee on Capitol Area Security met on January 13, 2026, adopted the January 7 minutes, and reviewed the committee’s work on the annual AAST/ACAS security report. The chair emphasized that the committee’s purpose is advisory only, but that its recommendations could guide the governor and legislature on improving security at the Minnesota Capitol complex. She also highlighted prior testimony about security practices in other states and said the committee’s report would likely recommend stronger screening and weapon-ban policies as part of a broader effort to prevent violence in public government spaces. Department of Public Safety advisers reported that they are still reviewing the report in detail and determining internal next steps. They also said quarterly security meetings with building tenants have been held and that internal and external tabletop exercises with law enforcement and other security partners are scheduled for the end of January. The Senate Sergeant-at-Arms gave a brief update on operational security changes, including hiring additional staff with security experience, weekly security meetings with DFL and GOP chiefs of staff, installation of two security kiosks, rollout of encrypted keycard ID badges, updated emergency procedure QR-code stickers, and implementation of the State Patrol’s threat matrix and reporting protocol. The Senate also said it is continuing joint training with the House and LCC. The committee then moved into a closed session under Minnesota Statute 13D.05, subdivision 3D, to discuss sensitive security details and non-public findings from the capital security assessment. The chair stated that the closed session would cover confidential vulnerabilities and operational information, and that the committee would later reconvene in public to vote on whether certain provisions from the public executive summary should be included as recommendations in the final report.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> professional can advise on sensitive professional can advise on sensitive questioning<00:15:47.360
• Any other further discussion about the bill?
• </c> Amendment any other member discussion Amendment any other member discussion about<00:26:44.640><
• </c> adopted any other further discussion adopted any other further discussion about<00:27:07.200><c>
• </c> you know through having this discussion you know through having this discussion um<00:53:03.839>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And so just wanted to Being discussed today, and so just wanted to, as chair of this committee, share
• Recently, I was having a discussion in Tokyo with a German ambassador.
• I just want to make a few points to frame this discussion before we go to direct questions.
• I just want to make a few points to frame this discussion before we go to direct questions.
• We've had a very robust discussion.

Summary: The Assembly Select Committee on Asia, California, Trade and Investment held its first informational hearing to examine California’s economic ties with Asia, the effects of federal tariffs, and ways the state can strengthen trade, investment, tourism, and subnational diplomacy. Chair Jessica Caloza opened by emphasizing California’s role as the world’s fourth-largest economy and a major exporter to Asia, and several members and guests highlighted the importance of AAPI communities, sister-city relationships, and coordinated state outreach. Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis described California’s trade missions, APEC hosting, and ongoing climate and trade partnerships, while Japan’s deputy consul general underscored Japan’s role as a major investor and trading partner and encouraged continued engagement. The first panel, featuring leaders from the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation/World Trade Center Los Angeles, the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, and Visit California, focused on trade, tourism, and investment trends. Witnesses said tariffs and federal uncertainty are disrupting logistics, manufacturing, business travel, higher education, and tourism, with particular concern about port activity, international student declines, and reduced visitation from Asia. They urged California to remain “open for business,” invest in promotion and infrastructure, and use trade missions, MOUs, and sister-city ties to maintain relationships and attract investment. The second panel, with economist Kyle Handley and trade expert Glenn Fukushima, focused on the mechanics and consequences of tariffs. Both said tariffs function as taxes on importers and consumers, raise costs for businesses, and create uncertainty that delays investment, hiring, and supply-chain decisions. They warned that California is especially exposed because of its ports, cross-border trade, and reliance on global supply chains, and said new federal vessel fees and shifting trade routes could divert commerce away from California. They argued that the long-term damage includes lost growth and reduced U.S. credibility, and recommended that California “tariff-proof” its economy through faster ports, better infrastructure, export assistance, and reduced permitting barriers. In the final panel, representatives from the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce, Asian Business Association California, and the Small Business Development Center emphasized future opportunities and the needs of small businesses. They said California should deepen ties with Asia through conventions, tourism, and sector-specific partnerships in life sciences, clean tech, semiconductors, hospitality, and small business trade. The witnesses stressed that small and minority-owned businesses need more access to trade missions, capital, technical assistance, and state support, and that California’s economic strength depends on coordinated efforts across regions and industries.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'll discuss that further in Section 3.
• I'll discuss that further in Section 3.
• I'll discuss that further in Section 3.
• This is the spay and neuter program previously discussed.
• This is the spay and neuter program previously discussed.

Summary: The committee met with a quorum present to hear Article VI Natural Resources agency budget recommendations, beginning with the Railroad Commission. LBB staff summarized the commission’s 2026-27 base recommendation at $458.7 million, down from the prior biennium, with an increased FTE cap. The presentation highlighted reduced federal IIJA funding, volatility in oil and gas regulation account 5155, continued support for IT modernization, and rider changes. The commission’s major exceptional items were then presented, including requests for produced water and injection data reporting, an authorized pit registration system, regulatory filing/permitting upgrades, an underground injection well investigation team, site remediation support, and especially $100 million for orphan well plugging. Members asked about biennium-to-biennium comparisons, salary biennialization, the scale of orphan well risks, federal funding delays, bonding, and whether the state should rely more on industry or general revenue for plugging costs. Commission leadership explained that orphan wells can threaten water and public safety, that plugging costs have risen sharply, and that current funding is insufficient to keep up with emergency wells and the backlog; they also said the agency is moving to cloud-based systems with cybersecurity protections and that the proposed performance measure may need adjustment if funding does not increase. The Railroad Commission testimony was followed by LBB and agency testimony for the Texas Animal Health Commission. LBB described a $42 million recommendation for 2026-27, an increase overall, but with a reduced FTE cap due to turnover and salary reallocation. The recommendation maintained funding for cattle fever tick work, chronic wasting disease, lab testing through an MOU with Texas A&M’s veterinary diagnostic lab, and a new $5 million spay-and-neuter pilot program, while deleting a capital budget rider and adjusting riders tied to entry point inspection stations and clinical trials. Agency leadership then outlined the commission’s mission to protect livestock health and the state’s $22 billion animal industry, and described major disease threats including highly pathogenic avian influenza, cattle fever ticks, New World screwworm, and chronic wasting disease. Their exceptional items focused on recruiting and retaining veterinarians, replacing fleet vehicles, creating an ectoparasite identification lab, adding field staff and IT support, improving records and epidemiology reporting, strengthening central administration, supporting secure food supply planning, expanding chronic wasting disease work, and staffing the new spay-and-neuter program. Members asked about field identification of ticks, the use of disinfectants and PPE, fleet management, the scale of cattle fever tick risk, and chronic wasting disease; the agency explained its current inspection and lab-confirmation process, its reliance on field disinfecting and biosecurity, and the need for more staff and better data systems to keep pace with growing workloads and disease threats.

Transcript Highlights:

• With us today for this discussion, we have from the Florida With us today for this discussion, we have
• Again, members, as you listen to the discussions today, Again, members, as you listen to the discussions
• DivTel is currently in renewal discussions for the four categories of voice services.
• So, I mean, a lot of things to discuss on that front, but we think that there's...
• But we would recommend for sensitive applications data at rest encryption. Thank you, Chief.

Summary: The subcommittee held its first meeting to examine Florida’s information technology governance, budgeting, cybersecurity, data management, and telecommunications operations. Chair Schneider and other members framed the panel as a new joint policy-and-budget forum focused on reducing jargon, improving accountability, and asking whether technology investments are feasible, aligned with state goals, cost-controlled, and secure. State Affairs Chairman Will Robinson and members emphasized that the committee should avoid buying “shiny new objects” without clear business cases and should focus on long-term value, cybersecurity, and operational efficiency. Florida Digital Service and Department of Management Services leaders provided an overview of the state IT enterprise. Secretary Pedro Allende described DMS as the state’s business, workforce, and technology service provider, while State CIO Warren Spanholz outlined Florida Digital Service’s four core areas: cybersecurity, project success, data interoperability, and enterprise architecture. Chief Data Officer Ed Ryan said the state data catalog is about 400,000 elements and roughly half of agencies are participating, and he described efforts to identify authoritative data sources and improve interoperability. Chief Information Security Officer Jeremy Rogers discussed the state cybersecurity operations center, enterprise risk management, incident response exercises, and a recurring $35 million cybersecurity resiliency budget. Chief Technology Officer Leo Schoonover described oversight of major IT projects over $10 million, updated project management standards, and a shift toward smaller phased implementations and more flexible methodologies to reduce delays and overruns. Other presenters covered telecommunications, data center operations, and cybersecurity workforce development. Director Denise Atkins said the Division of Telecommunications manages Suncom and MyFloridaNet, with nearly $336.9 million appropriated for fiscal year 2024-25, and is procuring the next network contract while emphasizing security controls and vendor flexibility. Tim Brown said the Northwest Regional Data Center operates on a chargeback basis, serves state and local customers, and returned surpluses to customers in recent years. Cyber Florida Director Ernie Ferraroso described training, workforce pipelines, K-12 outreach, a cyber range, and research programs aimed at building Florida’s cyber workforce and improving public-sector readiness. Members asked about budget setting, project delays, change orders, cybersecurity reporting, data catalog participation, interoperability, and expanding cybersecurity operations centers. Officials said chargeback rates are based on actual direct and indirect costs, project delays often stem from unclear scope and insufficient upfront planning, and cybersecurity success is measured by mean time to detect, respond, and recover. They also said the state is moving toward more modular project delivery, broader agency participation in shared cybersecurity services, and expanded CSOC locations within existing staff and budget where feasible.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> questions or discussion? questions or discussion? All<00:30:10.320><c> right.
• Members, any discussion? Mr.
• Members, any discussion?
• Members, any discussion? discussion? discussion?
• Members, any discussion? Members, any discussion?

Bills: SB3326

Keywords: renewable energy, energy storage, cost reduction, public utilities commission, Hawaii energy policies, 910, house, all

Summary: The joint committees on Energy and Environmental Protection and Labor heard SB 3326, a bill concerning a study of separating transmission from generation in Hawaii’s electric system. Testimony was largely opposed. Life of the Land argued that true separation on an isolated island grid has not been shown to work anywhere and said the bill would waste taxpayer money. Hawaiian Electric and the Public Utilities Commission also opposed the measure, saying Hawaii already uses competitive bidding for new generation, that the bill would add cost, complexity, and reliability risks, and that a new study would duplicate prior work. In response to questions, the PUC explained its existing competitive bidding framework and said it had not seen an island system fully restructure in this way. The chair then amended the bill’s intent to require the PUC to open a proceeding for an independent, comprehensive analysis of the state’s energy pathways, including cost reduction, financial risk, state energy goals, and reliability, rather than narrowly focusing on separation. Both committees voted to pass SB 3326 SD2 with amendments, with the Energy committee adopting the recommendation unanimously and the Labor committee adopting it with one reservation and two no votes. The Energy and Environmental Protection Committee then took up SB 2497 SD2, which would require electric utilities other than cooperatives to provide transparent, publicly accessible customer bill impact analyses and annual reports to the PUC. The Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs and the PUC offered comments, with the PUC supporting the intent. Life of the Land said the proposed disclosure requirements would be too complex for most ratepayers to use meaningfully, while Hawaiian Electric said the bill could raise costs and slow projects, though it acknowledged some of the language changes and said much of the information is already available through existing planning and regulatory processes. Hawaii Clean Power Alliance and one individual testified in support. No vote was taken on SB 2497 SD2 during the excerpt. The committee also heard SB 3183 SD2, which would bar higher-income taxpayers from claiming the renewable energy technologies income tax credit for certain residential solar systems and would change refundability rules. The Department of Taxation, the Hawaii State Energy Office, and the Tax Foundation offered comments, while the Hawaii Solar Energy Association and numerous companies and individuals opposed the bill. Opponents raised concerns about impacts on financing models and the solar market. Members asked the Department of Taxation for data on how credits are claimed by homeowners versus third-party owners and on the refundability of the credit; the department said it did not have the information immediately available but would follow up. The chair indicated decision-making would likely be deferred to allow further review, and no vote was taken in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Funston or not, the hearing proceedings are confidential, so I can't discuss those.
• It's better to have us have that free discussion. What really is our deliberations?
• We should be able to have those discussions that are very sensitive in confidence and with free discussion
• It fosters that discussion that I think you would want, that would just be free thinking.
• And so that would be a discussion that the incarcerated person and his attorney would have.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And I'll be here if you have any questions during the bill's discussion.
• And I'll be here if you have any questions during the bill's discussion.
• And I'll be here if you have any questions during the bill's discussion.
• </c> during the build bill's discussion. during the build bill's discussion.
• And so I think it asks me and may need to be part of that discussion.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Today, though, I'll be discussing the key components of the measure as they relate to other items on
• The first is the changes that I discussed a little bit earlier.
• I'm happy to discuss it.
• There was some discussion earlier regarding the requirements to be competitive.
• Thank you so much for the discussion.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Regularly, we meet quarterly with the Railroad Commission to discuss produced water.
• We meet monthly with the Water Development Board to discuss infrastructure funding and with PUC to discuss
• We are discussing timing and funding amounts to address it, and we're ready to have those discussions
• Where are we on that, on the buyback and shutting down sensitive reefs?
• And then our reefs, protecting our sensitive reefs, are smaller ones. Where are we on that?

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Yes, I would ask for representatives from the hospitals to show up in a full hearing and discuss those
• Any other discussion? Not seeing any. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye.
• In addition to—oh, the situations are time-sensitive.
• Is it something that you're willing to discuss at this time, or is it something that we should maybe
• Is it something that you're willing to discuss at this time, or is it something that we should maybe

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The House Health and Welfare Committee met with a quorum and first considered two bill introductions. RS 33-166 would repeal the remaining statutory section of the county medical indigent program, which was already repealed in 2022; despite one member’s concern about losing the ability to restore the program later, the committee voted to introduce it. RS 33-186 would require hospitals that accept Medicaid to collect self-reported immigration status on admission forms and submit quarterly utilization reports to the Department of Health and Welfare, which would then produce an annual report for the legislature and governor; members questioned administrative burden, redundancy, and the reliability of self-reporting, but the committee still voted to introduce it. The committee then heard House Bill 494, which would move current background-check rules into statute and consolidate the requirements in one chapter without adding new checks or costs. The sponsor said the change is needed to maintain FBI cooperation and avoid disruption in child care, foster care, health care, and services for vulnerable adults; department staff said background checks cost $70 per applicant, with a small existing exception for temporary care assistance participants. After questions about timing, the sex offender registry component, and the FBI memo supporting the bill, the committee voted to send HB 494 to the floor with a due pass recommendation. House Bill 531 would update Idaho law to allow schools to administer epinephrine through newer delivery systems, including nasal spray, rather than only EpiPens. Testimony from a parent, a school nurse, and an Idaho PTA representative supported the update, saying it would better match current medical practice, reduce hesitation and needle-stick risk, and help schools respond more quickly; one witness also asked for broader language on blood glucose monitoring for students with medical needs beyond diabetes. The sponsor said he was open to working on that issue in a separate bill, and the committee voted to send HB 531 to the floor with a due pass recommendation. Before adjournment, a member invited the committee to a Medicaid listening session later that day to hear concerns about proposed cuts.

Transcript Highlights:

• Yeah, I would ask for representatives from the hospitals to show up in a full hearing and discuss those
• Any other discussion? Not seeing any. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye.
• But typically they're done fairly early on in the process because, as we discussed in this committee,
• In addition, the situations are time-sensitive.
• Is it something that you're willing to discuss it? Amend it to deal with that.

Summary: The House Health and Welfare Committee met with a quorum and first considered RS 33-166, a code cleanup bill to repeal the final remaining section of the county medical indigent program, which had already been repealed in 2022. One member raised concern about removing the section entirely in case the program ever needed to be reinstated, but the sponsor said the bill was simply final cleanup requested by counties. The committee voted to introduce the bill. The committee then took up RS 33-186, which would require hospitals that accept Medicaid to add a self-reporting immigration-status question to admission forms and to submit quarterly data to the Department of Health and Welfare on admissions, emergency visits, and uncompensated care by immigration category. Members questioned administrative burden, redundancy, and whether the information would be reliable, but the sponsor said the purpose was transparency and data collection on hospital utilization and costs. The committee voted to introduce the bill. House Bill 494 was presented next as a measure to move existing background-check rules into statute, with the sponsor saying it would not add new checks or costs but would help preserve FBI cooperation and provide clearer legislative oversight. Department staff said background checks cost $70 per person and confirmed sex-offender registry checks would remain part of the process. The committee voted to send the bill to the floor with a due-pass recommendation. House Bill 531 updated Idaho law to allow schools to administer epinephrine through modern delivery systems, including nasal spray, rather than only EpiPens. Testimony from a parent, a school nurse, and an Idaho PTA representative supported the update, while one parent asked that the bill be broadened so blood glucose monitoring could be provided when prescribed for conditions other than diabetes. The sponsor said he was open to working on that issue in a separate bill, and the committee then voted to send HB 531 to the floor with a due-pass recommendation. At the end of the meeting, a member invited the committee to a Medicaid listening session later that day, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• There was a lot of discussion. There was a lot of changes over this session.
• Any discussion? Members, we will be taking a voice vote. All those in favor say I. I.
• Representative Morikawa. >> Madam Speaker, I second the motion. >> Any discussion?
• Representative Morawa. >> Madam Speaker, I second the motion. >> Any discussion?
• Representative Morawa. >> Madam Speaker, I second the motion. >> Any discussion? >> Any discussion?

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Is there further discussion on the motion? The motion is to introduce RS 33206.
• The committee discussed the motion and then voted aye; the motion carried.
• And that intent, ...by the sponsor and the discussion before.
• Is that an issue maybe that should be discussed in an election?
• Further discussion on the motion or further comments.

Summary: The committee first heard RS 33206, a proposal by Representative Gannon to allow “plug-in solar” or portable solar generators for homes and small businesses. He described it as a limited, UL-approved option capped at 1,200 watts, modeled on Utah legislation, and argued it could give consumers more flexibility and reduce utility controversy. Members questioned whether the devices are currently prohibited under utility rules and whether the bill was needed; Gannon said existing regulations likely require utility permission. The committee voted to introduce RS 33206. The committee then heard RS 3321 C1 from Representative Raibald, which would address county clerk concerns about liability and indemnification for private properties used as polling places. He said the measure would extend liability protections to polling-place properties and allow clerks to request coverage through the Secretary of State’s self-insured policy so long-used voting locations could remain available. The committee voted to introduce the RS. The bulk of the meeting focused on House Bill 561, a bill restricting flags displayed by government entities. Representative Hill said the bill was a response to Boise’s flag policy and was intended to keep government spaces neutral, with exceptions for certain official flags; he acknowledged some “collateral damage” to community banners and other displays. Supporters argued the bill was needed to prevent government endorsement of divisive symbols and to preserve a neutral public sphere. Opponents, including Boise Mayor Lauren McLean, city counsel Eric Stidham, clergy, LGBTQ advocates, Basque community members, and others, said the bill was an overreach that targeted Boise’s pride flag, limited local control, and would chill expression and harm community inclusion. Testimony also raised concerns about the bill’s penalties and possible unintended effects on other flags and community events. After testimony, the committee debated motions to advance the bill, hold it, or send it to general orders; the transcript ends amid that discussion without a final recorded disposition.

Transcript Highlights:

• Okay, seeing none, we're going to bring it back for discussion or questions.
• Okay, seeing none, we're going to bring it back for discussion or questions. Senator Rubio.
• And so we are willing to explain, or excuse me, to discuss other alternatives to see if there's a way
• It's all we're protecting the birth parents, which I'm sensitive to and understand.
• So back to what we were discussing yesterday, there is still room open for conversations.

Summary: The committee first took up SB 490 by Senator Umberg, which would set deadlines for DHCS to investigate complaints about unlicensed sober living or recovery homes and require follow-up site visits; if the department cannot act within those timelines, counties and cities could request to assist with enforcement. Supporters, including a Garden Grove councilmember and the League of California Cities, said the bill would improve public safety and close enforcement gaps. County behavioral health representatives opposed the measure, arguing counties lack jurisdiction over private unlicensed residences, could face liability, and would absorb an unfunded workload increase. After extensive questioning about jurisdiction, local pressure, and whether the bill creates a mandate, the committee voted 8-0 to pass SB 490 to Appropriations and placed it on call. The committee then heard SB 381 by Senator Wahab, which would allow adult adoptees and descendants to obtain original birth certificates, create a contact preference form for birth parents, and stop omitting certain birth information from the amended certificate. The author and many adoptees and birth parents testified that access to original records is important for identity, dignity, and medical history, and that the bill would reduce the need for invasive searches through DNA and informal records. Several members raised concerns about privacy, the possibility of unwanted contact, and the mental health impacts on birth parents who expected confidentiality, while others emphasized the health benefits and the fact that most modern adoptions are open. The discussion focused heavily on proposed amendments to the contact form and whether the bill should require opt-in or opt-out contact preferences, but the transcript does not show a final vote on SB 381.

Transcript Highlights:

• Is there discussion on the motion? For the questions, Representative Dygert.
• Is there discussion on the motion? For the questions, Representative Dygert?
• Further discussion on the motion.
• Further discussion on the motion.
• Further discussion on the motion.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from Wednesday, February 25th. It then considered several RS measures focused largely on cleanup or technical changes: R.S. 33439, which removed duplicative language; R.S. 3344.4, which updated the Children’s and Library Protection Act by adding an “adolescent minor” definition and narrowing harmful-material provisions; R.S. 33470 C1, which clarified that a fire protection subdistrict commissioner must be an elector residing in that subdistrict; R.S. 32895, which removed obsolete treasurer securities-lending code; and R.S. 32900, which repealed outdated liquor-code sections. Each of these RS measures was introduced by motion and approved by voice vote, though R.S. 32900 drew questions about why certain liquor-related provisions were being removed and was noted as likely needing further explanation from the Liquor Division. The committee then took up House Bill 650, a proposal by Representative Boyle to codify Idaho’s view of federalism and state sovereignty. Boyle said the bill was intended to reaffirm constitutional limits on federal power, not to invalidate federal law, and argued it would help Idaho assert its rights in disputes with the federal government. Support came from the Idaho Farm Bureau Federation and several members who said the state should push back against federal overreach. Opponents raised concerns that the bill could be read as secessionist, create new legal presumptions and standards, conflict with tribal sovereignty, and lead to costly litigation. Some members also questioned whether the bill was already covered by the Tenth Amendment. After debate, the committee voted on a due-pass motion for House Bill 650. The motion passed 11-2, with Representatives Church and Haas voting no. The chair closed by praising the committee for a civil and thoughtful discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• For the discussion, Representative Walsh. Thank you, Madam Chair.
• Discussion, Representative Walsh. Thank you, Madam Chair.
• Earlier discussion, Representative Burnett.
• Is there discussion?
• Further discussion, Representative Fayette Bill.

Bills: HB2255, HB2354, HB2595, HB2320, HB2597

Keywords: litigation finance, legal funding, lawsuit, financial services, access to justice, common interest communities, homeowners association, property management, housing regulations, community governance, criminal justice, judgment, collateral attack, legal proceedings, sentencing reform, firearm regulation, manufacturing, safety standards, background checks, license requirements

Transcript Highlights:

• /c> issue is so time-sensitive issue is so time-sensitive and and and you<00:04:30.240><c> I</c><00:04
• >> Yeah, we open up for member discussion.
• </c> being discussed. being discussed.
• Uh, thanks for the discussion.
• So thank you all. discussion. Um, I like to st uh share discussion.

Bills: HF3127, HF3816, HF3814, HF3815, HF3817

Keywords: taxation, pass-through entity, qualifying owner, partnership, S corporation, tax return, corporate franchise tax, individual income tax, research expenditures, federal compliance, Minnesota Statutes, income tax, corporate tax, section 179, federal conformity, HF3815, Minnesota taxes, tax conformity, Internal Revenue Code, IRC conformity

Transcript Highlights:

• Do you want to mention, as we'll discuss, I do you want to mention, as we'll discuss, that the Judiciary
• But I know she had some things she wanted to discuss, and I'll make sure I discuss with her afterwards
• I want to thank... ...had some things she wanted to discuss, but I'll make sure I discuss with her afterwards
• Now, part of our discussion probably will be, well, how do you know?
• Thank you, and thank you for the rich discussion.

Summary: The committee held its first hearing and took up several privacy, AI, and consumer protection bills. SB 1106 (Cabaldon) would shorten the Delete Act data broker deletion response deadline from 45 days to 30 days; it received support from the California Initiative for Technology and Democracy, one senator said they would lay off pending implementation of the original law, and the bill passed on a due-pass motion to Appropriations with a 5-0 vote on call. SB 923 (Becker) would expand the CCPA deletion right to all personal information held by businesses and require online-only businesses to offer a web form or similar method for privacy requests; supporters included the California Privacy Protection Agency and privacy groups, while business groups raised concerns about scope, compliance, and the email/web-form requirement. The committee advanced it 6-0 to Appropriations, on call, with members noting continued work on amendments. SB 1142 (Becker) would regulate digital replicas and deepfakes, including takedown and notice provisions for large online platforms and protections against misuse of a person’s likeness, voice, or identity. Supporters emphasized harms from non-consensual synthetic media and fraud; opponents, including the Motion Picture Association and tech industry groups, raised First Amendment, due process, Section 230, and overbreadth concerns, especially around deceased persons and the 48-hour takedown process. Members said they would support the bill while working on constitutional issues, and it passed 6-0 to Judiciary, on call. The committee also adopted its rules without objection. The committee then heard several member bills. SB 867 (Padilla) would impose a four-year moratorium on AI chatbot-powered toys for children; supporters cited research showing sexual content, dangerous advice, and privacy risks, while opponents asked for narrower definitions and retailer liability protections. It passed 7-0 to Appropriations, on call. SB 1247 (Padilla) would give child influencers a right to request deletion or modification of images and likenesses used in monetized social media content; there was little testimony beyond a civil justice group’s opposition to a new private right of action, and it passed 7-0 to Judiciary, on call. SB 1114 (Cabaldon) would restrict sharing of state-collected LGBTQ-related data absent an enforceable order; Equality California and other advocates supported it as a safeguard against misuse of sensitive data, and it passed 6-0 to Appropriations, on call. SB 1159 (Cabaldon) would limit local governments’ obligation to treat AI bots and agents as persons in public participation and records processes; supporters said AI-generated comment floods and requests can drown out human participation, while opponents argued the bill should focus on fraud and warned about overreach. It passed 9-0 to Appropriations. Finally, SB 1050 (Ashby) would require disclosures when advertisements use AI-generated synthetic performers; supporters framed it as a truth-in-advertising and worker-protection measure, while opponents urged narrower, materiality-based standards and exemptions for broadcasters. Members generally supported the goal but raised concerns about breadth and alignment with existing law, and the bill was moved forward on a due-pass motion to Judiciary.