Video & Transcript : 'R.S. 14:313.2' :
Page 83 of 500
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Legislative Ethics Commission (9-9-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:14:28.240><c> Um</c><00:14:28.639><c> and</c><00:14:28.880><c> we</c><00:14:29.120><c> would<
- <00:14:30.320><c> of</c><00:14:30.560><c> the</c><00:14:30.720><c> parties</c><00:14:31.279><c> is</c
- It<00:14:35.040><c> it</c><00:14:35.440><c> really</c><00:14:35.839><c> may</c><00:14:36.079><c> not<
- </c><00:14:37.680><c> all</c><00:14:38.000><c> wanted</c><00:14:38.480><c> to</c><00:14:38.720><c> do
- ><c> he's</c><00:14:48.399><c> out</c><00:14:48.560><c> on</c><00:14:48.720><c> a</c><00:14:48.880><c
Summary:
The meeting began with roll call, where a quorum was confirmed, and the commission approved the July 8, 2025 minutes. The staff report was deferred to later in the agenda. The commission then took up a consolidated matter involving case numbers 24 LEC 3 and 24 LEC 6, centered on a pending motion to dismiss and a response that had been filed.
Counsel for Representative Grossberg argued the case should be dismissed because the attorney handling the matter, Mr. Jenkins, allegedly lacked a properly approved contract under government contract review requirements. She also argued that the complaint process was flawed, that complainants relied on rumor and anonymous assertions, and that the matter reflected political retaliation and abuse of process. She said a renewed motion to dismiss had been filed and requested a hearing date and briefing schedule. Enforcement counsel responded that he had been authorized to proceed by the commission, that the contract issue had been disclosed before the preliminary hearing, and that the cited cases did not support dismissal.
The chair allowed limited rebuttal, after which the parties clarified their positions on whether Mr. Jenkins had been authorized to act as enforcement counsel and for what period. The commission then voted to go into executive session under KRS 61.810 to discuss and deliberate the pending motion and any confidential complaints. The motion passed, and the meeting moved into closed session.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- :07.560><c> uh</c><00:14:07.759><c> and</c><00:14:08.040><c> they</c><00:14:08.199><c> have</c><00:14
- :14:09.839><c> of</c><00:14:10.079><c> like</c><00:14:10.240><c> I</c><00:14:10.320><c> said</c><00:14
- <00:14:21.839><c> and</c><00:14:22.040><c> things</c><00:14:22.279><c> like</c><00:14:22.480><c> that
- so there<00:14:23.800><c> and</c><00:14:24.120><c> um</c><00:14:24.279><c> it's</c><00:14:24.399><c>
- 26.399><c> uh</c><00:14:26.519><c> Farmers</c><00:14:27.199><c> uh</c><00:14:27.320><c> to</c><00:14:
Committee:
Senate Taxes
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:14:09.040><c> We</c><00:14:09.279><c> certainly</c><00:14:09.519><c> have</c><00:14:09.600><c
- </c><00:14:15.199><c> President,</c><00:14:15.600><c> I</c><00:14:15.760><c> do</c><00:14:15.920><c>
- And<00:14:22.079><c> I</c><00:14:22.240><c> will</c><00:14:22.720><c> call</c><00:14:22.959><c> your<
- </c><00:14:34.560><c> We</c><00:14:34.800><c> have</c><00:14:34.959><c> Khalani</c><00:14:35.600><c>
- We<00:14:36.800><c> have</c><00:14:37.440><c> Are</c><00:14:37.680><c> you</c><00:14:37.839><c> here?
MS
Mississippi 2026 Regular Session
Highways and Transportation - Room 216, 30 January, 2026; 10:00 AM
Highways and Transportation
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:14:06.800><c> cam</c><00:14:07.199><c> to</c><00:14:07.440><c> be</c><00:14:08.000><c> in</c><00:
- 14:13.920><c> of</c><00:14:14.079><c> this</c><00:14:14.240><c> bill.
- ><00:14:42.959><c> may</c><00:14:43.120><c> not</c><00:14:43.279><c> be</c><00:14:43.360><c> able</c>
- </c><00:14:44.240><c> I</c><00:14:44.480><c> wouldn't</c><00:14:44.639><c> want</c><00:14:44.800><c>
- </c> Well,<00:14:50.000><c> if</c><00:14:50.160><c> we're</c><00:14:50.320><c> if</c><00:14:50.480><c
Committee:
Joint Highways and Transportation
AL
Alabama 2026 Regular Session
Alabama House Jefferson County Legislation Committee Jan 21st, 2026
Jefferson County Legislation
Transcript Highlights:
- ><c> go</c><00:14:00.399><c> down</c><00:14:00.560><c> in</c><00:14:00.720><c> the</c><00:14:00.880><
- >> Anyways,<00:14:46.560><c> House</c><00:14:46.880><c> Bill</c><00:14:47.519><c> 199</c><00:14
- </c><00:14:52.560><c> the</c><00:14:52.720><c> house</c><00:14:52.959><c> out</c><00:14:53.199><c> of
- ><c> Senate</c><00:14:53.680><c> committee</c><00:14:53.920><c> and</c><00:14:54.079><c> it</c><00:14
- </c><00:14:55.680><c> Hopefully,</c><00:14:56.079><c> this</c><00:14:56.240><c> will</c><00:14:56.320
Committee:
House Jefferson County Legislation
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House/Senate DFL Press Conference 3/24/25
Transcript Highlights:
- I mean this this<00:14:18.480><c> sounds</c><00:14:19.279><c> like</c><00:14:20.000><c> you</c><00:14
- </c><00:14:21.360><c> tens</c><00:14:21.600><c> of</c><00:14:21.760><c> negotiations</c><00:14:22.320
- but I'm wondering<00:14:22.880><c> are</c><00:14:23.040><c> there</c><00:14:23.120><c> any</c><00:14
- </c><00:14:30.480><c> You</c><00:14:30.639><c> know,</c><00:14:30.800><c> I</c><00:14:31.040><c> think
- both,</c><00:14:34.800><c> you</c><00:14:34.959><c> know,</c><00:14:35.120><c> a</c><00:14:35.440><c>
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
House Labor, Health & Social Services Committee, February 16, 2026 - PM
Labor, Health & Social Services
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:14:17.760><c> I</c><00:14:18.079><c> got</c><00:14:18.240><c> this</c><00:14:18.959><c> in</c
- </c><00:14:23.440><c> would</c><00:14:23.760><c> like</c><00:14:23.839><c> to</c><00:14:24.000><c> ask
- </c><00:14:30.000><c> shall</c><00:14:30.320><c> be</c><00:14:30.639><c> in</c><00:14:30.880><c> the<
- /c> ending<00:14:38.000><c> on</c><00:14:38.480><c> at</c><00:14:38.639><c> that</c><00:14:38.880><c>
- per</c><00:14:39.199><c> a</c><00:14:39.440><c> period</c><00:14:39.760><c> on</c><00:14:39.920><c>
Committee:
House Labor, Health & Social Services
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:14:06.720><c> be</c><00:14:06.920><c> protected</c><00:14:07.519><c> so</c><00:14:07.720><c>
- ><00:14:21.399><c> that</c><00:14:21.639><c> bill</c><00:14:22.600><c> um</c><00:14:22.880><c> they</
- <c> they</c><00:14:29.120><c> do</c><00:14:29.279><c> have</c><00:14:29.399><c> some</c><00:14:29.639
- ><c> um</c><00:14:33.959><c> also</c><00:14:34.680><c> um</c><00:14:35.360><c> House</c><00:14:35.720
- House<00:14:50.160><c> Bill</c><00:14:50.759><c> 1232</c><00:14:51.759><c> does</c><00:14:51.959><c>
Committee:
House Health
Summary:
The House Committee on Health heard testimony on several measures. On HB 1233 relating to storm water management, the Attorney General’s office said the state may need to share costs with counties for any new inspection or regulatory program. Testifiers strongly supported the bill, including the Hawaiian Lifeguard Association and a community member who described her daughter’s death in a poorly maintained detention pond and urged statewide inspections and a comprehensive approach. A member asked the Attorney General about the cost-sharing issue, and the office said state appropriations would be needed if counties are required to take on new duties.
The committee then heard HB 245 on student heat exposure safety. The Department of Education, Department of Health, and the Hawaii State Council on Developmental Disabilities supported the measure. A physician testifying for the Climate Change and Health Working Group described children’s vulnerability to heat and cited examples from other states that adopted stronger heat guidelines after school heat deaths. The Department of Education said it could do the feasibility study without additional funding and preferred to wait for the study before deciding on equipment needs. The Attorney General’s office later testified on HB 903, authorizing schools to maintain bronchodilators, supporting the concept but warning that the bill’s definition of school was broad and that DOE may not have jurisdiction over all covered entities; it suggested changing “protocol” to “guidelines” and involving the Public Charter School Commission.
On HB 1314 relating to youth mental health, the Department of Education testified in opposition, though no additional testimony was offered. The committee also heard HB 1334 on meat donation, with DLNR and the Hawaii Farm Bureau supporting the measure. HB 799 on health care drew support from HMSA and the Hawaii Association of Health Plans, while the Department of Health said it supported the intent but wanted amendments, including limiting the bill to Maui, adding a sunset, and requiring a study of quality and access impacts. On HB 952 relating to Parkinson’s disease research, the Department of Health said the proposal would require additional appropriations and staffing and suggested a public-private partnership approach; the Hawaii Parkinson Association, Queen’s clinicians, and other supporters testified that a registry would help identify the number of patients and improve care. Finally, SHPDA strongly supported HB 1431 establishing an oral health task force, saying the state lacks sufficient dental oversight and that both keiki and kūpuna need better access to services.
WY
Transcript Highlights:
- :17.120><c> no</c><00:14:17.360><c> idea</c><00:14:17.600><c> what</c><00:14:17.760><c> it</c><00:14:
- </c><00:14:20.320><c> I</c><00:14:20.639><c> I</c><00:14:21.040><c> see</c><00:14:21.279><c> ter</c>
- :14:27.519><c> two,</c><00:14:27.760><c> line</c><00:14:28.079><c> three,</c><00:14:29.120><c> any</c
- governing body<00:14:30.639><c> that</c><00:14:31.199><c> operates</c><00:14:31.680><c> the</c><00:14
- :14:08.960><c> by</c><01:14:09.199><c> the</c><01:14:09.360><c> 45</c><01:14:09.840><c> and</c><01:14
Committee:
House Appropriations
Keywords:
911 services, emergency response, grant funding, next generation technology, government accountability, public safety, mental health, detention, competency evaluation, treatment, contractual agreements, Wyoming, budget, funding, education, wildfire prevention, healthcare, community colleges, grants, economic development
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Kentucky Housing Task Force 2025 (10-21-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- :14.720><c> uh</c><00:14:14.880><c> that's</c><00:14:15.040><c> a</c><00:14:15.199><c> big</c><00:14:
- c><00:14:33.040><c> the</c><00:14:33.279><c> spring</c><00:14:33.519><c> to</c><00:14:33.760><c> new<
- > So,</c><00:14:35.040><c> and</c><00:14:35.279><c> we'll</c><00:14:35.519><c> start</c><00:14:35.680
- </c><00:14:36.880><c> too</c><00:14:37.040><c> with</c><00:14:37.360><c> the</c><00:14:37.680><c> U</
- </c><00:14:39.120><c> So,</c><00:14:39.600><c> we</c><00:14:39.760><c> expect</c><00:14:40.320><c> uh
Keywords:
Meeting Start 00:00:07
Roll Call 00:00:25
Discussion of Lexington’s Housing Affordability Partnership 00:02:26
Discussion of Northern Kentucky’s Housing Blueprint 00:30:12
Discussion of Religious Institution Land Use 00:57:33
Discussion of Free-Market Solutions to Kentucky’s Housing Crisis 01:04:18
Adjournment 01:26:37, 958, all
Summary:
The committee met without a quorum and began informally, with members noting this was the final information-gathering meeting on housing before a November meeting to discuss findings and report back to the LRC. The main presentation focused on the Lexington Affordable Housing Partnership, a public-private effort supported by a $10 million state allocation. Presenters described Fayette County’s housing shortage, citing a gap of more than 22,000 units, rising home prices, and the challenge of assembling land and capital for affordable projects.
The partnership explained that five local banks created a $3 million capital investment fund to buy and hold land at no interest, with deed restrictions keeping the site at 80% or below area median income and allowing the banks to seek Community Reinvestment Act credit. The first project is a 12.5-acre former Transylvania University baseball field, planned for about 242 units, including detached homes, townhouses, garden-style apartments, and senior housing. Speakers said the project required extensive neighborhood engagement and zoning/development approvals, but that the planning phase is now largely complete and infrastructure work should begin soon.
Financing details included roughly $64 million in additional funding through tax credit equity, market-rate loans, city support, Kentucky Housing Corporation resources, and donations from nonprofit partners. Developers said the multifamily bond applications are due to Kentucky Housing Corporation the next day, and they expect the land purchase to be repaid into the revolving fund once the property is entitled and closed, allowing the original $3 million to be redeployed for future projects. They estimated rental units could be filled within about six months of completion, while for-sale units would come online over 12 to 36 months.
In discussion, members asked about regulatory barriers and project timelines. Presenters pointed to rising construction costs tied to new federal and state requirements, and one member highlighted the need to continue reviewing planning and zoning reforms to speed development plan approvals and reduce delays. The group also endorsed a possible statewide $20 million housing fund, a residential infrastructure fund, and efforts to avoid additional regulatory burdens on housing development.
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Artificial Intelligence Task Force 2025 (6-26-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- ,<00:14:07.560><c> hiring</c><00:14:07.880><c> more</c><00:14:08.080><c> people,</c><00:14:08.720><c>
- :15.240><c> we</c><00:14:15.360><c> don't</c><00:14:15.680><c> want</c><00:14:15.840><c> to</c><00:14
- </c><00:14:18.240><c> And</c><00:14:18.360><c> I</c><00:14:18.400><c> also</c><00:14:18.680><c> point
- ,</c><00:14:23.280><c> and</c><00:14:23.400><c> this</c><00:14:23.520><c> is</c><00:14:23.680><c> our
- come in<00:14:28.840><c> and</c><00:14:28.960><c> protect</c><00:14:29.360><c> us</c><00:14:29.640><
Keywords:
Meeting Start - 00:00
Roll Call – 00:34
KY Chamber of Commerce KY Business Perspectives – 01:50
COT Update on SB4 – 27:16
Adjournment – 48:18, 958, all
Summary:
The 2025 Artificial Intelligence Task Force met for its first meeting of the year and heard updates on federal AI policy, state implementation of Senate Bill 4, and the business community’s perspective on AI regulation. Co-chairs noted that federal legislation could affect the task force’s work later in the year, but said Kentucky still has significant issues to study, including energy, land use, education, social media, and children’s engagement with AI. The task force had quorum and no votes were taken.
Kate Shanks of the Kentucky Chamber said the business community supports continued discussion but favors a federal approach over a patchwork of state laws. She described the Trump administration’s new AI executive order as emphasizing innovation over regulation, noted the pending federal AI action plan, and discussed congressional action including the Take It Down Act and industry-specific changes to existing laws. She warned that state-by-state AI rules could increase costs and burden businesses, and said the Chamber would prefer incremental, flexible policy that avoids conflict with existing law and limits private rights of action. Members asked about uniform model legislation, education uses of AI, and civil liability; Shanks said a model approach could help avoid fragmentation and that liability should generally be handled through consumer-protection-style enforcement rather than broad litigation.
The Commonwealth Office of Technology then reported on implementation of SB 4, saying it has worked with industry, agencies, other states, and vendors to build an AI policy framework now in final review. Officials said an AI Governance Committee has been established and will meet in July, and a draft RFP is being prepared to meet the bill’s tracking and documentation requirements. They said no major implementation challenges have been identified so far, but the impact of pending federal rules remains uncertain. Members also discussed the need to educate students and teachers about AI, with one member emphasizing that schools should teach both how to use AI and how to think critically about information online.
MD
Transcript Highlights:
- >> All<00:14:24.240><c> right,</c><00:14:24.399><c> Senator,</c><00:14:24.720><c> the</c><00:14
- ><00:14:35.920><c> and</c><00:14:36.079><c> and</c><00:14:36.399><c> some</c><00:14:36.639><c> other<
- 14:42.320><c> in</c><00:14:42.560><c> the</c><00:14:42.720><c> bill.
- And so I wanted<00:14:43.920><c> to</c><00:14:44.079><c> see</c><00:14:44.160><c> if</c><00:14:44.320
- </c><00:14:50.240><c> Uh</c><00:14:50.720><c> the</c><00:14:50.959><c> bill</c><00:14:51.199><c> will
MD
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:14:09.440><c> A</c><00:14:09.680><c> lot</c><00:14:09.760><c> of</c><00:14:09.920><c> people<
- </c><00:14:14.720><c> So</c><00:14:14.959><c> we</c><00:14:15.199><c> will</c><00:14:15.360><c> be</c
- Okay,<00:14:18.240><c> that</c><00:14:18.480><c> it's</c><00:14:18.720><c> going</c><00:14:18.800><c>
- open</c><00:14:20.320><c> which</c><00:14:20.560><c> is</c><00:14:20.720><c> why</c><00:14:20.959><c>
- </c><00:14:32.639><c> I</c><00:14:32.880><c> really</c><00:14:33.199><c> appreciate</c><00:14:33.680>
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/25/25
Judiciary Finance and Civil Law
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:14:03.079><c> yes</c><00:14:03.279><c> thank</c><00:14:03.440><c> you</c><00:14:03.639><c> chair<
- to</c><00:14:05.160><c> your</c><00:14:05.600><c> point</c><00:14:06.399><c> we</c><00:14:06.639><c>
- in</c><00:14:14.320><c> the</c><00:14:14.440><c> state</c><00:14:14.639><c> of</c><00:14:14.759><c>
- <00:14:22.800><c> no</c><00:14:23.120><c> removal</c><00:14:23.560><c> of</c><00:14:23.800><c> Rights
- 14:42.400><c> of</c><01:14:42.639><c> this</c><01:14:42.880><c> job</c><01:14:43.679><c> and</c><01:14
Committee:
House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law
Keywords:
corporate governance, shareholder rights, beneficial ownership, defective corporate acts, Minnesota Business Corporation Act, trusts, Uniform Trust Code, probate, estate planning, trust protector, directed trust, investment trust advisor, distribution trust advisor, excluded fiduciary, decanting, power of appointment, revocable trust, irrevocable trust, uneconomic trust, rule against perpetuities
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- :00.600><c> SBA</c><00:14:01.600><c> okay</c><00:14:01.920><c> come</c><00:14:02.040><c> on</c><00:14
- :02.199><c> up</c><00:14:02.600><c> Dr</c> Len<00:14:07.600><c> H</c><00:14:08.600><c> Joy</c><00:14:
- 14:12.560><c> uh</c><00:14:12.839><c> very</c><00:14:13.000><c> briefly</c><00:14:13.320><c> just</c>
- need</c><00:14:14.360><c> to</c><00:14:14.480><c> identify</c><00:14:15.320><c> Jack</c><00:14:15.519
- c> we're</c><00:14:21.279><c> very</c><00:14:21.480><c> much</c><00:14:21.639><c> in</c><00:14:21.839
Committee:
Senate Health and Human Services
Summary:
The committee opened its first hearing of the 2025 session with procedural instructions about testimony limits, Zoom participation, written testimony, and a reconvening date if needed. It then heard SB 200 on speedy trials. The Office of the Public Defender opposed the bill, arguing it could create conflicts of interest for prosecutors, potentially make victims or witnesses quasi-parties to criminal cases, force traumatizing testimony on continuance motions, and unfairly delay trials for in-custody defendants. A World Care representative supported the bill and urged broader protections for minors, disabled people, and seniors. The chair also pressed the public defender to suggest improvements, emphasizing that the bill was driven by victims and families. No vote or final action was taken on SB 200.
The committee next took up SB 8 on jury duty exemptions for health professionals. Testimony was strongly supportive from nurses, physicians, and disability advocates, who said APRNs and other nurses are in short supply and that jury service can disrupt patient care, especially in rural and neighbor island areas. One witness suggested expanding the exemption to include registered nurses as well as APRNs, while a senator raised concerns about blanket exemptions for non-practicing APRNs and suggested a time limit. The bill remained under discussion with no final action reported.
The committee then heard SB 144 on chiropractic, with the state chiropractic board offering comments and the Hawaii State Chiropractic Association supporting the measure as a way to address workforce shortages and provide students more hands-on clinical experience. A World Care witness also supported the bill after clarifying her remarks. The chair then moved to SB 107 on medical informed consent, where the Hawaii Medical Board opposed the bill and the Healthcare Association of Hawaii and Queen’s Health System offered comments, citing concerns about duplicative standards. A support witness proposed expanding the bill to better address combined mental and physical health conditions. Finally, SB 189 on breast cancer screening drew support from the Hawaii Medical Association, Hawaii Radiological Society, Queen’s Health Systems, and others, while the Insurance Division raised concerns about possible insurance mandate defrayment and the need for a sunrise analysis. Senators also asked about local demographic data and coverage impacts; the chair indicated decision-making would be deferred to another day.
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
JHA Public Hearing - Tue Mar 25, 2025 @ 2:00 PM HST
Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- :01.519><c> we</c><00:14:01.759><c> just</c><00:14:01.880><c> like</c><00:14:02.079><c> to</c><00:14:
- <00:14:24.959><c> next</c><00:14:25.240><c> we</c><00:14:25.480><c> have</c><00:14:25.959><c> uh</c><
- is when<00:14:38.839><c> I</c><00:14:38.959><c> say</c><00:14:39.160><c> not</c><00:14:39.279><c> a<
- /c><00:14:39.440><c> big</c><00:14:39.639><c> deal</c><00:14:39.959><c> I</c><00:14:40.040><c> mean</
- </c><00:14:40.920><c> it</c><00:14:41.079><c> repeals</c><00:14:41.600><c> a</c><00:14:41.720><c> lot
Committee:
House Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs
Summary:
The House Committee on Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs heard Senate Bill 1322, SD2, HD1, a comprehensive measure revising Hawaii’s mental health code. The bill would clarify emergency transportation, examination, and hospitalization procedures for people who may be mentally ill or suffering from substance abuse and deemed imminently dangerous, expand notice requirements, allow certain information-sharing for assisted community treatment petitions, and add liability protections for emergency responders and providers. The Department of the Attorney General supported the bill as a collaborative update to the law, while the Department of Health asked for a copy of provider-generated emergency transport documentation within five days for data and planning purposes.
Testimony was sharply divided. Queen’s Health System, Hawaiʻi Pacific Health, HHSC, and the Institute for Human Services supported the measure or parts of it but requested amendments, including clarifying whether a second psychiatric exam is required, restoring a 72-hour rather than 48-hour stabilization window, and adjusting where patients are taken when an MEO cannot be reached. The ACLU of Hawaiʻi strongly opposed the bill, arguing it weakens due process and civil liberties, especially around involuntary commitment, assisted community treatment, emergency transport by police, and reduced procedural safeguards; it urged the committee to hold the bill and consider an interim working group. Louie E.K. of the Hawaiʻi Disability Rights Center also opposed the bill, focusing on immunity from negligence, the use of police for transport, and the reduction of a three-provider review to one in state-hospital treatment orders.
Other testimony included support from an individual who said the bill could improve mental health care delivery amid provider shortages, and a comment from Hawaiʻi Health and Harm Reduction Center warning that the substance use portion of the bill lacks evidence of effectiveness and could be misused. In response to committee questions, the Attorney General’s office said the measure was developed with input from multiple stakeholders, including state agencies, hospitals, the ACLU, HHSC, and IHS, and that it aims to make assisted community treatment more accessible and effective by streamlining the legal process and improving consequences for noncompliance. No vote or final action was taken during the portion of the meeting provided.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- ><00:14:03.279><c> state</c><00:14:03.519><c> anywhere</c><00:14:03.880><c> ever</c><00:14:04.079><c>
- :14:08.120><c> credit</c><00:14:08.639><c> is</c><00:14:08.839><c> not</c><00:14:09.040><c> an</c><00
- interaction<00:14:10.839><c> and</c><00:14:11.000><c> no</c><00:14:11.199><c> other</c><00:14:11.440
- 14:20.399><c> course</c><00:14:20.639><c> not</c><00:14:21.279><c> thank</c><00:14:21.440><c> you</c>
- </c><00:14:24.000><c> okay</c><00:14:24.920><c> okay</c><00:14:25.279><c> let's</c><00:14:25.560><c>
Committee:
House Taxes
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (01/29/2026)
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:14:01.600><c> it</c><00:14:01.760><c> was</c><00:14:01.839><c> not</c><00:14:02.000><c> covered</
- c><00:14:06.560><c> not</c><00:14:06.800><c> come</c><00:14:06.959><c> into</c><00:14:07.279><c> play
- I'm<00:14:07.680><c> sorry</c><00:14:07.839><c> to</c><00:14:08.000><c> speak</c><00:14:08.160><c> in
- 14:33.920><c> all</c><00:14:34.240><c> as</c><00:14:34.480><c> we</c><00:14:34.720><c> think</c><00:14
- 14:05.040><c> that</c><04:14:05.199><c> we</c><04:14:05.359><c> have</c><04:14:05.439><c> in</c><04:14
Committee:
House Criminal Justice and Public Safety
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:14:07.199><c> I'll</c><00:14:07.519><c> be</c><00:14:07.680><c> interested</c><00:14:07.920><
- </c><00:14:11.680><c> Um,</c><00:14:12.320><c> I'm</c><00:14:12.560><c> going</c><00:14:12.639><c> to
- <00:14:14.480><c> on</c><00:14:14.639><c> the</c><00:14:14.880><c> idea</c><00:14:15.040><c> that</c>
- </c><00:14:17.040><c> I'll</c><00:14:17.519><c> uh</c><00:14:17.680><c> the</c><00:14:17.920><c> jobs
- </c><00:14:31.920><c> This</c><00:14:32.160><c> is</c><00:14:32.320><c> a</c><00:14:32.480><c> bill</
Committee:
House Ways and Means
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Government Contract Review Committee (10-13-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- And<00:14:07.360><c> their</c><00:14:07.520><c> total</c><00:14:07.800><c> amount</c><00:14:08.280><c
- 14:09.240><c> back</c><00:14:09.440><c> before</c><00:14:09.800><c> you</c><00:14:09.960><c> all</c><
- ><c> just</c><00:14:17.800><c> killed</c><00:14:18.040><c> your</c><00:14:18.160><c> chance</c><00:14
- That's<00:14:22.240><c> quite</c><00:14:22.440><c> all</c><00:14:22.560><c> right,</c><00:14:22.960><
- Um<00:14:33.880><c> I</c><00:14:34.040><c> I</c><00:14:34.120><c> have</c><00:14:34.240><c> received<
Summary:
The committee first approved the September 19 meeting minutes and then took up a deferred University of Kentucky personal services contract amendment for guardianship services. UK officials explained that the contract covers court-appointed guardians for patients who cannot make medical decisions and are not eligible for state guardianship, with the work funded by UK Medical Center agency dollars rather than the general fund. Members questioned the large increase in the not-to-exceed amount, the number of cases, the hourly billing structure, and whether there are safeguards to prevent unnecessary costs or reimbursement issues if a patient later has resources. UK said the increase reflects shifting work from a prior firm, anticipated new cases, a move from a monthly fee to hourly billing, and the need for a second firm because one prior attorney died and another firm has had difficulty appearing in court promptly. The committee ultimately approved the contract, while Senator Thomas said he would vote aye but urged future review of attorney fee limits and broader guardianship statutes, which he described as outdated and inconsistent.
The committee then deferred three Office of Energy Policy memorandum of agreement items to the November 2025 meeting without objection. After that, it approved the remaining agenda items, including the contract lists and deferred items not separately selected for review.
The final major item was a University of Kentucky personal services contract related to fundraising and philanthropic outreach. UK representatives said the contract supports marketing and donor engagement efforts to grow the university’s endowment pipeline and philanthropic support. The transcript cuts off before the committee finished its questions or took final action on that item.