Transcript Highlights:

• I'd like to also<00:02:10.800><c> add</c><00:02:11.520><c> that</c><00:02:12.480><c> Senator</c><00:02
• ><c> friend</c><00:02:18.319><c> of</c><00:02:18.480><c> mine</c><00:02:18.800><c> who</c><00:02:19.040
• 703</c><00:02:42.080><c> are</c><00:02:42.319><c> referred</c><00:02:42.720><c> in</c><00:02:42.959>
• </c><00:02:44.959><c> the</c><00:02:45.200><c> order</c><00:02:45.440><c> of</c><00:02:45.599><c> the
• &gt;&gt; Mr.<00:02:54.319><c> President,</c><00:02:54.720><c> I</c><00:02:55.120><c> I</c><00:02:55.599

Bills: SB2347, SB2911, SB2033, SB2158, SB2993, SB2778, SB2672, SB2014, SB3144, SB3096, SB3097, SB2968, SB2363, SB3154, SB2400, SB3313, SB2896, SB3279, SB2614, SB2687, SB2754, SB2549, SB3325, SB2658, SB2659, SB2602, SB2611, SB2877, SB3063, SB2615, SB3232, SB2875, SB3272, SB2854, SB3203, SB2803, SB2804, SB3302, SB3229, SB2969, SB2412, SB2657, SB2880, SB2540, SB2414, SB3142, SB3202, SB2281, SB2852, SB2272, SB2479, SB2589, SB2936, SB2720, SB2730, SB2749, SB2688, SB2798, SB3040, SB3107, SB3010, SB3109, SB3140, SB3187, SB2057, SB2377, SB3048, SB3083, SB3182

Keywords: tenant rights, landlord obligations, housing crisis, eviction prevention, multilingual access, intoxicating liquor, direct shipment, breweries, distilleries, Hawaii, renewable energy, grid-ready homes, interconnection process, electric utility, energy independence, surcharge, customer access, energy storage, smart inverters, veterinary workforce

Transcript Highlights:

• And so ultimately, this is legislation that we have in statute, but I believe we should strengthen it
• And if we keep it in statute, we can still look toward the future and change that if we need to.
• The way I read this, I'm not seeing that it actually changes anything that is in statute today.
• I'm not seeing that it actually changes anything that is in statute today.
• This bill consolidates the statute to a single version that encompasses all the...

Bills: SB227, SB1942, SB1627, SB625, SJR39, SJR47

Keywords: gross production tax, ad valorem tax, property exemption, Oklahoma Tax Commission, oil and gas production, regulatory impact, economic implications, dental insurance, health care, medical necessity, insurance claims, dentist rights, criminal code cleanup, duplicate statutes, statutory consolidation, repealer bill, emergency clause, Title 21 crimes, Title 47 DUI, child abuse reporting

Summary: The committee heard several measures, led by SJR 39, a proposed constitutional amendment to send to voters that would cap annual homestead property tax valuation growth at 1% and all other property at 3%. The speaker argued it would not cut taxes but slow growth for taxpayers facing rising assessments, while opponents questioned the effect on county revenues, sheriff funding, and whether growth below inflation would strain local governments. After debate, the committee voted 10-2 to report the resolution due pass. The committee also heard HJR 47, which would place proof-of-identity requirements for voting in the Constitution. Supporters said it would strengthen election integrity and noted existing law already requires proof of identity, while opponents raised concerns about impacts on voters with disabilities and the difficulty of changing constitutional language if problems arise. The measure was reported due pass on an 11-1 vote. Senate Bill 227, described as supporting fair taxation and investment without duplicative tax, and SB 1942, clarifying the distinction between reimbursable and reimbursed dental services to protect providers and patients, both passed the committee on near-unanimous votes. The committee then advanced SB 1627, a 116-page sentence-modernization and consolidation bill that was described as a cleanup measure with no substantive change to existing law, and it was reported due pass unanimously. Finally, SB 625 was presented as temporary cleanup language related to domestic violence legislation and judicial requests, with the sponsor noting the bill would be replaced by a floor substitute later; the committee approved it due pass 10-0. The meeting ended with the chair noting the committee was dismissed and likely to meet again under the rules committee schedule.

Transcript Highlights:

• wouldn't be altering that; it would just be on And so that the statute wouldn't be altering that, it
• They just need the permission through state statute, which is our job, to enable it to move forward.
• , so to pass the statute would be adding another layer on top of that.
• However, irrigators have asked to see a change in statute to allow irrigation to temporarily continue
• Currently, without the statute, ideally we would have had a representative from ADEQ here today.

Bills: SB1137, SB1176, SB1287, SB1335, SB1336, SB1445, SB1677

Keywords: underground utilities, utility locating, dig safe, call before you dig, 811, excavation safety, damage prevention, one-call center, locate request, white lining, large project coordination, buried infrastructure, subsurface utilities, utility marking, locator wire, locator strip, interactive positive response system, landlord duties, apartment community, mobile home park

Transcript Highlights:

• Whereas if it was passed in statute, that would be harder for them to do, is that correct? Mr.
• Chair and Representative Martinez, we comply as best we can with those and always follow statutes, so
• And I just think that we should take care of it in statute.
• And I think that this does need to be codified in statute. With that, I vote aye. Okay, thank you.
• As you all probably know, veterinary medicine is the cornerstone of Arizona, and the statutes related

Bills: SB1198, SB1199, SB1286, SB1683, SB1761

Keywords: Arizona beef council, beef promotion, agricultural marketing, commodity council, livestock, cattle industry, ranching, rural affairs, self-financed program, sunset extension, continuation bill, market development, beef products, Arizona agriculture, Title 41, Title 3, sunset review, marketing order, producer assessment, Salt River horse herd

Transcript Highlights:

• :00.560><c> box</c><01:02:00.960><c> office,</c><01:02:01.320><c> only</c><01:02:01.960><c> 6%</c><01
• The public back backlash<01:02:06.160><c> was</c><01:02:06.320><c> so</c><01:02:06.560><c> intense</c
• </c><01:02:12.080><c> national</c><01:02:12.560><c> news.
• </c><01:02:38.840><c> So</c><01:02:39.040><c> if</c><01:02:39.200><c> bot</c><01:02:39.520><c> bans</
• </c><01:02:43.320><c> to</c><01:02:43.440><c> this</c><01:02:43.640><c> committee</c><01:02:44.080><c

Bills: SB2603, SB3007, SB3019, SB3022, SB2795, SB2256, SB3250, SB2147

Keywords: Hawaii Symphony Orchestra, state funding, public performances, educational programs, cultural arts funding, culture and arts, arts policy, cultural preservation, community development, economic revitalization, place-based planning, public spaces, historic preservation, adaptive reuse, mixed-use development, business improvement district, Honolulu Chinatown, DBEDT, Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism, state foundation on culture and the arts

Summary: The committee heard testimony on SB 2603 SD1, which would designate the Hawaii Symphony Orchestra as the state symphony orchestra, require annual reports to the legislature, and appropriate funds. Testimony was overwhelmingly in support from the orchestra, the Hawaii Youth Symphony, the Hawaii Arts Alliance, business and arts groups, and many individuals. Supporters emphasized the orchestra’s cultural value, its role in inspiring youth and supporting arts education, and its broader community impact. No opposition or questions were raised, and the chair offered praise for the level of public engagement around the measure. The committee then took up SB 3007 SD2, relating to culture and the arts, which would create an Office of Community Culture and Innovation within the State Foundation on Culture and the Arts, require annual reporting, appropriate funds, and establish a Community and Cultural Partnerships Program. The Attorney General’s office warned that section four, which separately funds preservation and relocation of artwork from Aloha Stadium, may be non-germane and should be moved to a separate bill; it also suggested the office would be more properly placed under DAGS rather than SFCA. SFCA Director Karen Ewald testified with concerns about added costs, staffing burdens, and the need for earlier communication, while also saying the agency could support the work if properly coordinated. Opposition testimony argued the bill was duplicative or unnecessary, while supporters, including Governor Abercrombie and Dean Sakamoto, said it would help communities, especially Chinatown, and could support planning and cultural revitalization. The chair noted roughly eight opposition testimonies and five in support, and questioned witnesses about coordination and the cost of relocating the Aloha Stadium artwork, which Ewald estimated could cost at least $1.2 million. The AG’s office said removing section four would substantially reduce legal risk. Finally, the committee heard SB 3019 SD2, a consumer protection measure that would cap ticket resale prices at no more than $3 above the original price for events in Hawaii and authorize DCCA to adopt enforcement rules and fines. The Office of Consumer Protection opposed the bill, arguing it would strain limited enforcement resources, push sales to less regulated channels, and likely eliminate the protections offered by established secondary platforms. Chamber of Progress also opposed the bill, saying price caps would encourage black-market sales, scams, and fraud, and that resale markets serve legitimate consumer needs. In support, the National Independent Venue Association backed the measure, though the remainder of its testimony was not fully captured in the transcript excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Any<00:02:05.920><c> discussion?</c><00:02:06.719><c> Not</c><00:02:06.960><c> sure.
• Anyone<00:02:14.480><c> voting</c><00:02:14.879><c> no</c><00:02:15.120><c> with</c><00:02:15.280><c>
• </c><00:02:18.239><c> CPN</c><00:02:18.720><c> same</c><00:02:18.959><c> recommendation.
• :02:54.400><c> date</c><00:02:54.560><c> to</c><00:02:54.800><c> 20150.
• Any<00:02:56.160><c> discussion?</c><00:02:57.280><c> Not</c><00:02:57.519><c> sure.

Bills: SB2088, SB2925, SB3263, SB2047, SB2087, SB2100, SB2268, SB2353, SB2781, SB2902

Keywords: coconut trees, tax credit, natural management, Hawaii, agriculture, biosecurity, environment, coconut rhinoceros beetle, student-athletes, name image likeness, NIL, compensation, transparency, University of Hawaii, Title IX, funding, protections, pharmacy benefit managers, maximum allowable cost, drug pricing

Summary: The joint committee on Ways and Means and Consumer Protection met for decision-making only on two agendas and took action on a large number of Senate bills, with no oral testimony heard. On the 1016 agenda, the committee recommended passage of measures including SB 2088, SB 2925, SB 2781, and several others, and passed a number of bills with amendments. Notable amendments included SB 3263, which adopted AG amendments related to the name, image, and likeness endowment trust fund; SB 2047 on pharmacy benefit managers, which incorporated Hawaii Pharmacist Association changes; SB 2087 on health insurance, which added Insurance Division clarifications; SB 2100 on pesticides, which added a blank appropriation; SB 2353 on outdoor signage, which removed provisions related to the Wiki special district; and SB 2902 on renewable energy, which clarified certification standards for portable solar devices and exempted them from certain disclosure requirements. Most recommendations were adopted without objection, though a few members noted reservations on selected bills. The committee also deferred one bill on the agenda, SB 3327. The committee then moved to the 1015 agenda and acted on additional measures. SB 2003 was passed with amendments tied to Act 255, including a repeal trigger if deadlines are missed; SB 2497 on utility-related transparency drew the most discussion, with one member warning about litigation and costs while another argued it was simply about electricity-rate transparency, and it ultimately passed with PUC-related amendments and an exemption for utility cooperatives. Other measures were passed unamended or with technical or fiscal amendments, including bills affecting land planning, tax credits, conveyance tax language, shoreline maintenance, and community improvement projects. Several bills had appropriations blanked or effective dates deferred to 2050, and many were adopted with members noting reservations rather than opposition. On the 1017 agenda, the committee continued approving measures, including SB 709 on crisis intervention officers and assisted community treatment, SB 2153 on defining bona fide farmer/agriculture activity, SB 2694 on water rate adjustments, SB 3025 on income eligibility limits, and SB 3085 on the Hawaii film studio, which included a five-year repeal provision if the studio has not relocated. The committee also passed numerous other bills unamended or with technical amendments, often deferring effective dates or blanking appropriations. Across both agendas, the committee’s actions were largely consistent: bills were advanced with amendments tailored to agency requests, technical corrections, or fiscal adjustments, and votes were generally unanimous or near-unanimous with occasional reservations recorded.

Transcript Highlights:

• I think at this time it would be somewhat duplicative to also put this in statute.

Bills: HB1805, HB2110, HB2180, HB2184, HB2219, HB2469

Keywords: child welfare, advocacy, oversight, independent office, foster care, child advocate, child safety, nepotism, ethics, government transparency, accountability, legislative standards, electronic voting, legislative transparency, Hawaii House, voting system, appropriation, lawmaker safety, political violence, confidentiality

Summary: The House Committee on Legislative Management heard testimony on several measures. HB 1805, relating to child welfare, drew support from the University of Hawaii and concerns from the Attorney General about the bill’s definition of state agency and possible separation-of-powers and supremacy clause issues. During decision-making, the committee opted to move the child advocate function to the Attorney General’s office, accepted the Attorney General’s suggested scope and jurisdiction amendments, set the salary at 90% of the Department of Health deputy director’s salary, and passed the bill with amendments. HB 2110, relating to nepotism, received support from the Hawaii State Ethics Commission, which said the bill would apply the rule consistently and noted the existing good-cause exception process. The committee later deferred the bill, saying existing House rules on nepotism were already strict and that the proposal would be duplicative in statute. HB 2180, relating to voting boards, had no oral testimony in the room during the hearing, but the committee later amended it into a blank appropriations vehicle for the House of Representatives and passed it with amendments. HB 2184, relating to lawmaker safety, drew concerns from the Campaign Spending Commission that the bill would require redaction of address information and could create implementation issues, and the Attorney General noted missing language regarding appointed officials and an internal cross-reference issue. The committee adopted amendments to address those concerns and passed the bill with amendments. HB 2219, relating to disclosure of privileged communications to the Ombudsman, was clarified by the Ombudsman’s office as not requiring disclosure of privileged material, only preserving privilege if such material is voluntarily provided; the bill passed with amendments. HB 2469, relating to a regular session review working group, received testimony from the State Procurement Office, the Legislative Reference Bureau, and others in support and opposition, and the committee passed it with amendments after changing references and funding language.

Transcript Highlights:

• We don't have any problem with a statute that criminalizes conduct.
• It's very clear in our adoption statutes.
• statutes.
• But because the statute was revised in 2025, Arizona revised statutes, Criminal Code 13-3623 for child
• crimes against children statute.

Bills: HB2495, HB2557, HB2594, HB2615, HB2800, HB2861, HB2862, HB2931, HB2995, HB4042, HB4070, HB4117, HB4136

Keywords: vulnerable adults, sentencing, felonies, criminal justice, enhanced penalties, medical records, patient rights, healthcare access, privacy, healthcare providers, timeliness, address confidentiality, domestic violence, privacy protection, voter registration, court proceedings, parenting time, supervised visitation, family court, high-risk cases

Transcript Highlights:

• This is a modernization of the curator statute in Florida's probate code.
• This is a modernization of the curator statute in Florida's probate code by clarifying when a curator
• They can really violate existing audit statute, and there's really no recourse for us.

Bills: S0326, S0598, S0632, S0786, S1110, S1256, S1380, S1588, S7042, S7044

Keywords: curators, estates, court appointment, fiduciary duty, bond requirements, removal, surrogate, funeral homes, cemetery law, cremation, embalmer, funeral director, preneed contract, preneed funeral, human remains, unclaimed cremated remains, disposition of remains, hospice, palliative care, end-of-life care

Summary: The Banking and Insurance Committee met with a quorum present and temporarily postponed SB 7042 on legal tender and SB 1380 before taking up the remaining agenda. The committee first reported favorably C.S. for SB 326, which modernizes Florida’s curator statute in probate law by clarifying when curators may be appointed, what they may do, and what oversight applies. It then reported favorably SB 1256, which standardizes PBM pharmacy audits by requiring uniform audit standards, scope, frequency, penalties, and due process protections for pharmacies; testimony from pharmacists emphasized concerns about conflicts of interest, excessive audits, and disproportionate penalties, while preserving fraud investigations. The committee also reported favorably C.S. for SB 598 on funeral and cemetery services after adopting an amendment that removed provisions on civil damages caps and phasing out direct disposers; the bill updates licensure and contract rules and addresses unclaimed remains. SB 632, which sets insurance requirements for transportation network companies during the period after a ride is accepted but before pickup, was reported favorably despite opposition from an attorney who argued the existing coverage framework should not be reduced. C.S. for SB 786, creating a nonjudicial process to close out undisputed trusts and discharge trustees, was also reported favorably. The committee then took up SB 1110, a major bill expanding Medicaid and private insurance coverage for medically necessary orthotics and prosthetics, including activity limbs, and requiring annual reporting. After adopting an amendment clarifying eligible recipients, the committee heard extensive emotional testimony from amputees, parents, and advocates describing the medical, developmental, and financial importance of prosthetic coverage, and members spoke in strong support before the bill was reported favorably. Later, the committee considered SB 1588, which implements last session’s legal tender law by refining definitions, narrowing custodian provisions, eliminating unnecessary examination requirements, and repealing the sunset clause; members raised questions about verification and anti-money-laundering concerns, but the bill was reported favorably. Finally, the committee approved SPB 7044 as a committee bill to expand public records exemptions to records relating to newly regulated custodians of gold and silver. The meeting concluded with senators recording additional affirmative votes on selected bills and adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um but again<01:02:05.200><c> it's</c><01:02:05.680><c> very</c><01:02:06.079><c> different</c><01:02
• Um all right.<01:02:17.200><c> We</c><01:02:17.440><c> have</c><01:02:17.520><c> one</c><01:02:17.920
• :02:39.680><c> Bruce</c><01:02:40.319><c> members</c><01:02:40.640><c> of</c><01:02:40.799><c> the</c
• The<01:02:46.720><c> Department</c><01:02:46.960><c> of</c><01:02:47.119><c> Hawai</c><01:02:47.440><
• <c> that</c><01:02:51.200><c> was</c><01:02:51.280><c> approved</c><01:02:51.599><c> by</c><01:02:51.760

Bills: HB1924, HB2121, HB1928, HB1979, HB1650, HB1543, HB1981, HB1982

Keywords: mattress recycling, waste management, producer responsibility, environmental health, steafardship program, electronic cigarettes, disposable devices, environmental protection, plastic pollution, lithium batteries, pollution control, public health, deposit beverage container, bottle bill, container deposit law, container redemption, recycling refund, extended producer responsibility, EPR, deposit return system

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several measures related to waste, recycling, and environmental review. On HB 1924, which would establish a mattress stewardship program, the Department of Health said it stood on written testimony and offered comments, while Hawaii Reef and Ocean Coalition and one individual supported the bill and the International Sleep Products Association opposed it. No questions were raised and the committee moved on. A large portion of the hearing focused on HB 2121, which would prohibit the sale of disposable vapes in Hawaii. The Department of Health supported the measure but suggested the bill may be better placed in a different part of state law because the cited waste-management section regulates products after consumption, while still praising the effort to remove disposable vapes from the market and environment. Testimony in strong support came from the Coalition for Tobacco Free Hawaii Youth Council, Hawaii Public Health Institute, Hawaii COPD Coalition, Hawaii Health and Harm Reduction Center, the City and County of Honolulu, and many individuals; supporters emphasized youth vaping, toxic waste, lithium battery fire risks, and environmental harm. There was at least one opposing individual and the International Sleep Products Association was listed in opposition. The committee noted there were many written testimonies and no immediate vote was taken. The committee also heard HB 1928 on the deposit beverage container recycling program. The Department of Health stood on written testimony. The Solid Waste Task Force of Hawaii Environmental Change Agents and Upstream supported the bill but urged amendments to better integrate reuse and reusables, strengthen enforcement, clarify definitions, and protect existing redemption centers. The Hawaii Food Industry Association supported the concept of a backdrop program but preferred strengthening the existing program and raised concerns about undefined fees, existing infrastructure, and future audit costs. The Chamber of Commerce Hawaii supported the bill, and the chair said the measure needs work and that decision-making would occur in a few days. Finally, the committee took up HB 979 on environmental review and HB 1650 on environmental assessments. For HB 979, OPSD offered amendments, HCDA supported the bill but suggested clarifying the affordable-housing definition, Kauai Island Utility Cooperative supported it, and Earthjustice was asked about the court process for environmental challenges; the chair asked about shortening the challenge period and the relationship between environmental court, the intermediate court of appeals, and the Supreme Court. For HB 1650, OPSD and the State Historic Preservation Division stood on written testimony, OHA asked to retain historic sites, and several groups and individuals testified in support or opposition. Opponents argued that removing Wiki special district and historic sites from Chapter 343 trigger language would weaken environmental review and risk impacts to iwi kūpuna and historic resources.

Transcript Highlights:

• The City of Mesa responded that the statute did not require a sitting judge’s signature, and she said
• The City of Mesa said the statute did not require a sitting judge’s signature, and she said she could
• She added that there is no statute on this point, and that the bill would require digital signatures.
• That's not their business model, so we took the same set of statutes and put it here for this specific
• So we think it's better if it's in statute regardless, and just to bring this back.

Bills: HB2163, HB2256, HB2305, HB2367, HB2369, HB2669, HB2772, HB2916, HCM2007, HCR2004, HR2003

Keywords: lighting laws, construction equipment, farm equipment, vehicle safety, Arizona Revised Statutes, salvage vehicles, insurance claims, abandoned vehicles, salvage auction dealers, vehicle title, towing regulation, private towing carriers, vehicle impound, towing rates, preemption, law enforcement, neighborhood electric vehicles, alternative fuel, vehicle license tax, tax exemption

Transcript Highlights:

• They're looking at statutes and how to apply them to a particular taxpayer, group of taxpayers.
• Chair, the statute is uh 43-1042, I believe. Okay, I want to look that up. I believe.
• Under Arizona Revised Statute 33-401, the grantor or the giving party is required to sign an official
• The county assessors want to include language in statute that dictates both parties, grantor and grantee
• The county assessors want to include language in statute that dictates both parties, grantor and grantee

Bills: SB1042, SB1043, SB1044, SB1135, SB1136, SB1142, SB1180, SB1221, SB1252, SB1254, SCR1003

Keywords: public funds, virtual currency, bitcoin, investment, Arizona Strategic Digital Asset Reserve Act, state treasurer, retirement system, state payments, cryptocurrency, Arizona law, payment methods, government transactions, property tax, tax exemption, Arizona Revised Statutes, digital currency, workers' compensation, death benefits, burial costs, spousal compensation

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRgioMkILUs, 2026-07-02T01:23:16+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Start 00:41 - HB 1611, HD2 03:54 - HB 1842, HD1 04:50 - HB 1886, HD1 07:01 - HB 2016, HD1 08:01 - HB 2107, HD2 13:01 - HB 2193, HD1 15:14 - HB 2231, HD1 19:28 - HB 2241, HD1 19:48 - HB 2352, HD1 21:27 - HB 2396, HD1 22:10 - HB 2457, HD2 23:03 - HB 2458, HD1 24:08 - HB 2483, HD1 24:40 - HB 2515, HD1 25:18 - HB 2581, HD1 28:19 - HB 2582, HD1 34:17 - HB 2610, HD1 38:02 - DM PSM 3:00 PM 49:27 - HB 2523, HD1 01:17:37 - DM PSM 3:45 PM Hearing Notices: PSM 3:00 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_PSM_03-11-24_.PDF PSM 3:45 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_PSM_03-11-24-1_.PDF, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFb7wCWPno4, 2026-07-02T01:23:13+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 0:00 - Start 1:24 - SB2065 8:48 - DM HOU-CPN 9:30 AM 10:35 - SB2026 12:16 - DM CPN-HOU 9:35 AM 13:59 - SB2904 20:40 - SB2908 21:53 - SB2977 25:15 - SB2983 34:04 - SB2843 38:11 - DM CPN-PSM 9:40 AM 46:02 - SB2227 56:46 - SB2728 1:07:00 - SB2762 1:09:52 - DM CPN 9:50 AM Hearing Notices: HOU-CPN 9:30 AM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_HOU-CPN_01-31-24_.pdf CPN-HOU 9:35 AM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_CPN-HOU_01-31-24_.pdf CPN-PSM 9:40 AM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_CPN-PSM_01-31-24_.pdf CPN 9:50 AM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_CPN_01-31-24_.pdf, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI House YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-xU_g_e90E, 2026-07-02T01:22:46+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, House Agenda: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/Session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_CPC-LMG_03-29-23_.PDF Followed by 2:10PM Agenda: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/Session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_CPC_03-29-23_.PDF 10:04 - Introduction (CPC/LMG 2:00 PM) 10:39 - HCR 100 / HR 107 15:09 - HCR 181 / HR 186 15:40 - HCR 112 / HR 118 16:28 - HCR 201 / HR 205 21:16 - Decision Making (CPC/LMG 2:00 PM) ------- 38:24 - Introduction (CPC 2:15 PM) 38:50 - HCR 204 / HR 208 40:08 - HCR 49 42:16 - HCR 7, HD1 / HR 6, HD1 46:05 - HCR 42 / HR 46 47:21 - HCR 39 / HR 43 48:38 - HCR 99 / HR 106 53:36 - HCR 41 / HR 45 56:29 - HCR 9 1:02:57 - Decision Making (CPC 2:15 PM), 910, house, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOubnP4o-I4, 2026-07-02T01:23:08+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Start 02:39 - HB 1204, HD1 19:07 - DM HRE-EDU 3:15 PM 23:10 - HB 247, HD1 49:19 - DM AEN-EDU-HRE 3:16 PM 50:40 - HB 260, HD1 57:39 - HB 388, HD1 1:09:51 - HB 1046, HD2 1:10:52 - HB 1329, HD1 1:12:10 - HB 55, HD1 1:15:35 - DM EDU 3:00 PM 1:18:25 - DM EDU DEFER 3:00 PM Hearing Notices: EDU 3:00 PM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_EDU_03-20-23_.HTM EDU DEFER 3:00 PM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_EDU_03-20-23_DEFER_.pdf HRE-EDU 3:15 PM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_HRE-EDU_03-20-23_.HTM AEN-EDU-HRE 3:16 PM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_AEN-EDU-HRE_03-20-23_.HTM, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgwvnwSH3_s, 2026-06-21T07:17:04+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, MEETING START 00:00:00 ROLL CALL 00:00:43 HB 115 DISCUSSION 00:01:39 HB 115 VOTE 00:03:31 HB 144 DISCUSSION 00:08:49 HB 144 VOTE 00:09:46 HB 78 DISCUSSION 00:10:55 HB 78 VOTE 00:11:34 HB 183 DISCUSSION 00:13:09 HB 183 VOTE 00:25:23 HB 207 DISCUSSION 00:26:26 HB 207 VOTE 00:29:05 HB 338 DISCUSSION 00:30:48 HB 338 VOTE 00:35:46 HB 369 DISCUSSION 00:38:15 HB 369 VOTE 00:40:21 HB 568 DISCUSSION 00:41:14 HB 568 VOTE 00:47:34 HB 249 DISCUSSION 00:48:45 HB 249 VOTE 01:02:01 HB 262 DISCUSSION 01:03:56 HB 262 VOTE 01:12:50, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI House YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_F5J23dha9M, 2026-07-02T01:22:45+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, House Agenda: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/Session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_EEP-WAL_03-16-23_.PDF Followed by WAL/EEP 9:05AM Agenda: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/Session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_WAL-EEP_03-16-23_.PDF Then followed by EEP 9:35AM Decision Making: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/Session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_EEP_03-16-23_.PDF Timestamps: 15:06 - Introduction (EEP/WAL 9:00AM) 15:23 - SB426 SD2 53:56 - SB428 SD1 55:32 - SB285 SD2 58:28 - SB777 SD2 1:01:00 - SB458 SD2 1:18:48 - SB781 SD2 1:26:13 - SB388 --- 1:35:55 - Introduction (WAL/EEP 9:05AM) 1:36:02 - SB1066 SD2 1:36:48 - SB1377 SD1 1:38:35 - SB409 SD1 --- 1:41:21 - Decision Making (EEP/WAL 9:00AM) 1:52:52 - Decision Making (WAL/EEP 9:05AM) 1:55:17 - Decision Making (EEP 9:35AM), 910, house, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuaIMhhw0A0, 2026-07-02T01:23:06+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Start 00:28 - DM HHS DEFER 1:00 PM 06:25 - SB 129 12:03 - SB 164 13:25 - SB 235 14:59 - SB 239 21:40 - SB 312 26:09 - SB 313 27:51 - SB 627 29:13 - SB 753 31:47 - SB 755 35:10 - SB 869 38:38 - SB 1016 40:23 - SB 1215 43:09 - SB 1280 46:44 - SB 1351 52:38 - SB 1418 58:27 - SB 1473 1:01:28 - SB 1474 1:02:08 - SB 1594 1:06:25 - SB 1615 1:19:30 - DM HHS 1:00 PM Hearing Notices: HHS 1:00 PM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_HHS_02-15-23_.pdf HHS DEFER 1:00 PM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_HHS_02-15-23_DEFER_.pdf, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzY5M--jduo, 2026-07-02T01:23:05+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Start 02:00 - SB 77 21:59 - SB 833 29:41 - SB 419 31:37 - SB 657 39:59 - DM AEN-WTL 1:00 PM 41:33 - SB 660 48:29 - SB 519 54:09 - DM AEN 1:30 PM 56:37 - SB 99 01:03:54 - SB 506 01:09:28 - SB 114 01:11:50 - DM AEN DEFER 2:00 PM 01:13:32 -DM AEN-WTL DEFER 2:05 PM Hearing Notices: AEN-WTL 1:00 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_AEN-WTL_02-03-23_.PDF AEN 1:30 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_AEN_02-03-23-1_.PDF AEN DEFER 2:00 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_AEN_02-03-23_.PDF AEN-WTL DEFER 2:05 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_AEN-WTL_02-03-23_DEFER_.PDF, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47