Transcript Highlights:

• I'm wondering does that include the basically $25 million for the two housing projects plus the second
• I'm wondering does that include the basically $25 million for the two housing projects plus the second
• I'm wondering does that include the basically $25 million for the two housing projects plus the second
• the project,<02:25:07.680> you<02:25:07.920> know,<02:25:08.240> on<02:25:08.560
• > time<02:25:08.880> for<02:25:09.120> for<02:25:09.600> this project, you

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• first residential dhhl<00:25:02.679> project<00:25:02.960> on<00:25:03.120> Maui
• ><00:25:03.520> in<00:25:03.600> nearly<00:25:03.880> two dhhl project on Maui in
• nearly two dhhl project on Maui in nearly two decades<00:25:04.960> which<00:25:05.120> when
• > project<00:25:19.360> at<00:25:19.520> the<00:25:19.600> former<00:25:19.880
• > bolad<00:25:20.240> Drome om Mo project at the former bolad Drome om Mo project at the

Keywords: House Agenda:, 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:07:21.080> within Improvements or capital projects within Improvements or capital projects
• basically said if this house bill 25 basically said if this house bill 25 gets<00:12:50.000>
• three other smaller projects that add up three other smaller projects that add up to<00:20:29.720>
• 1.1 billion dollars worth of projects 1.1 billion dollars worth of projects the<00:20:49.440>
• um the the cost of projects have incre um the the cost of projects have incre increased<00:47:57.480>

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The Public Works and Highways committee held a capital budget orientation led by Legislative Budget Assistant Office staff, who walked members through the budget materials, the capital budget process, and the committee’s compare sheet. The presentation explained that agencies begin developing capital requests nearly a year in advance, submit them by May 1, and that the governor’s recommended capital budget is a reduced version of the much larger agency wish list. Members were told the agencies initially requested about $1.1 billion in projects, the catalog was trimmed to just over $400 million in general fund projects, and the governor’s recommendation in the pink book totals about $143 million in general fund capital appropriations. The committee also reviewed the prior capital budget and related statutes and committee procedures. Several specific projects drew discussion. The Department of Education’s CTE projects were explained as having been shifted into the operating budget in the prior cycle and now returning to the capital budget recommendation; members asked whether there was a backup CTE project and whether local approval had been secured for the named project. The Cannon Mountain tramway request was highlighted as a $20 million recommendation, with the presenter explaining that an earlier $18 million appropriation would be lapsed back to the general fund to help balance the budget. The Department of Corrections’ new prison project was also discussed; members were told the state has already appropriated $50 million for planning and site evaluation, but the governor’s current capital budget does not include a new prison construction appropriation because the project is not yet ready for that phase and may need to be funded differently, possibly through a separate, staggered appropriation. State Treasurer Monica Mezzapelli then presented on debt affordability and the state’s borrowing capacity. She said the state’s credit position has improved, with the debt-to-revenue ratio falling from 8.2% in 2015 to 3.8% in 2024, and explained that RSA 6-C limits debt authorization to 10% of unrestricted prior-year revenue. She noted that the Treasury’s planning assumes $60 million in annual bond issuance, with the prison-related $40 million now expected to be issued in 2026 rather than 2025 because the project is not ready to spend the funds. She said the state can still borrow more, but additional debt service must be paid from operating funds, and recommended keeping capital bonding in the $120 million to $130 million range to preserve affordability and the state’s credit rating. Members asked for clarification on the CTE funding shift, the prison schedule, and the meaning of the large agency request totals. The chair and treasurer discussed the governor’s $143 million recommendation versus the committee’s usual target range, and the treasurer said $130 million would be more comfortable than $140 million, with $135 million described as a possible compromise. No formal votes or committee actions were taken in the portion provided; the meeting was informational and ended with the presenters offering to answer follow-up questions as agencies come before the committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:25:00.480> I'm<00:25:00.720> Gary<00:25:01.120> Gin,<00:25:01.440> Faget
• On<00:25:07.827> [clears throat]<00:25:07.919> behalf<00:25:08.159> of<00:25:08.240
• ,<00:25:11.840> we<00:25:12.000> would<00:25:12.159> like<00:25:12.240> to
• Even even<00:25:41.679> though<00:25:41.919> corners<00:25:42.400> do<00:25:42.640
• 00:25:55.840> where<00:25:56.000> the<00:25:56.159> individual<00:25:56.640>

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• > people<01:25:04.639> that<01:25:04.880> don't<01:25:05.120> live<01:25:
• So,<01:25:08.000> we<01:25:08.239> can<01:25:08.400> talk<01:25:08.639> about
• > we<01:25:10.800> would<01:25:10.960> like<01:25:11.040> to<01:25:11.199
• <01:25:12.159> I<01:25:12.320> would<01:25:12.480> like<01:25:12.560> to<
• 01:25:12.719> see<01:25:12.800> a<01:25:13.040> lot<01:25:13.120> of<01:25

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The meeting opened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, then moved into committee and floor reports. Several measures received favorable committee reports and were ordered to first reading and placed on the calendar, including Current Resolution 9, Senate Joint Resolution 23, House Bill 145, House Bill 567, and House Bill 506 with House Committee Substitute 1. The chamber also noted that House Bills 500 and 504 had already received two readings and were sent to the Rules Committee before House Bill 500 was brought up for final consideration. Most of the discussion focused on House Bill 500, the executive branch budget bill. Members described it as a “good first draft” and emphasized a budget process they said was more transparent than in prior years. The bill was presented as a restrained two-year operating budget with spending growth kept at a little under 2% annually, while setting aside about 2% of projected revenues, or roughly $614 million, in the Budget Reserve Trust Fund for future needs. The budget also used base reductions in some areas while exempting others such as Medicaid benefits, SEEK, corrections, behavioral health, and veterans programs. Subcommittee chairs then outlined major spending areas. Education provisions included a 2% annual increase in base SEEK funding, transportation funding held flat, equalization for recallable nickel funding, continued retirement contributions, and major support for postsecondary access, dual credit, asset preservation, and workforce training. Health and family services provisions held Medicaid steady while adding waiver slots, behavioral health and substance use support, public health investments, and funding for rural health and laboratory capacity. Other sections covered personnel and pensions, veterans services, infrastructure, public safety, economic development, tourism, and environmental projects. The only recorded action on the floor was adoption of House Committee Substitute 1 to House Bill 500, followed by a motion for final passage of the bill as amended. The transcript ends as discussion on final passage begins, before any final vote is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• yes<00:25:53.360> yeah<00:25:53.480> so<00:25:53.720> so<00:25:53.840> we're
• <00:25:55.080> is<00:25:55.240> that<00:25:55.440> we<00:25:55.559> can't
• <00:25:59.399> I'm<00:25:59.480> saying<00:25:59.720> is<00:25:59.960> okay
• 01:25:20.360> is<01:25:20.600> very<01:25:20.880> rigid<01:25:21.880> that's<
• project 2025 initially the economies project 2025 initially the economies project they<01:25:30.600

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• There are a lot of interstate projects there and, of course, some state route projects.
• So our flagship project right now is I-25, Comanche, and Montgomery.
• Page 2, under House Bill 2, Section 9, done in 2021, that very first project on that list, the I-25 New
• It’s a local project.
• Just to put it in perspective, that project is a Bernalillo County LEED project.

Transcript Highlights:

• :00.720> so<00:25:00.919> we're<00:25:01.080> in<00:25:01.200> the<00:25:
• c><00:25:04.159> back<00:25:04.279> to<00:25:04.440> all<00:25:04.640> these<
• 08.720> so<00:25:08.880> it's<00:25:09.039> a<00:25:09.240> process<00:25
• :25:12.760> thank<00:25:12.919> you<00:25:13.039> madam<00:25:13.240> chair
• :25:03.400> we<01:25:03.560> did<01:25:03.719> in<01:25:03.840> our<01:25

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• to 64.83% for<00:25:02.640> municipalities<00:25:03.560> and<00:25:04.200> 35.17%
• Mr.<00:25:14.120> Chairman,<00:25:14.480> thank<00:25:14.720> you. Mr.
• And what what<00:25:34.679> are<00:25:34.760> we<00:25:34.960> currently?
• Chairman, Senator Larson.<00:25:39.800> So,<00:25:40.080> currently<00:25:40.960> um
• <00:25:41.040> in<00:25:41.280> for<00:25:41.440> the Larson.

Bills: SF0052

Keywords: wildlife management, environmental restoration, funding, invasive species, aquatic ecosystems, native fish, habitat conservation, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:25:01.320> we<00:25:01.440> have<00:25:01.679> available<00:25:02.600>
• > hundreds<00:25:09.600> and<00:25:09.760> hundreds<00:25:10.039> of<00:25
• has<00:25:13.360> as<00:25:13.520> well<00:25:14.440> that<00:25:14.679>
• <00:25:20.279> why<00:25:21.279> would<00:25:21.520> we<00:25:21.760> not
• the<00:25:31.440> issue<00:25:31.840> is<00:25:32.120> that<00:25:32.559>

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 1077, a governor’s administration bill to increase transient accommodations tax revenue and split it between two new special funds: a climate mitigation and resiliency special fund and an economic development and revitalization special fund for tourism/resort areas. Supporters, including the Governor’s Office, recovery and resilience staff, climate and conservation groups, and several state agencies, said the bill would create a dedicated, more reliable funding stream for wildfire mitigation, coastal resilience, land clearing, infrastructure, and community-led projects. Some supporters also urged changes to the bill, including moving the fund to DLNR, adding DHHL and OHA representation, clarifying community grants, and ensuring the fund can support both state-led and community-led resilience work. The Attorney General’s office flagged a drafting issue, noting that the bill references fees deposited into the new fund even though the new chapter does not authorize fee collection, and recommended deleting that language or adding fee authority. The Climate Advisory Team representative also suggested adding DHHL to the decision-making body and requiring at-large members to have climate, resilience, conservation, or infrastructure expertise. The Tax Foundation of Hawaii and the Kohala Coast Resort Association opposed the measure, arguing that the special fund structure does not meet statutory criteria, that the bill functions as a tax increase, and that the transient accommodations tax is not being collected equitably across all lodging types before any increase is imposed. Other opponents, including tourism and lodging interests, warned that hotels and timeshares already bear most of the tax burden and that raising the TAT could hurt an already struggling visitor industry and drive tourists away. Supporters countered that current funding is far short of what is needed and that a dedicated revenue stream is necessary to address climate impacts now. Committee members questioned why the Legislature should cede spending decisions to a separate executive-branch process, and the administration responded that the bill is intended to create a transparent, recurring mechanism for funding priorities that can be adjusted over time. No vote or final action was taken in the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• In<00:25:02.040> the<00:25:02.160> instance<00:25:02.480> that<00:25:02.680>
• and<00:25:05.120> they<00:25:05.200> have<00:25:05.320> a<00:25:05.400><
• <00:25:08.800> housing<00:25:09.400> is<00:25:09.520> because<00:25:10.000><
• But, if people are<00:25:12.760> coming<00:25:13.240> into<00:25:13.640> a<00:25
• <01:25:36.560> 5%<01:25:36.960> is<01:25:37.040> the<01:25:37.160> max.

Bills: HB1984, HB1593, HB2423, HB1691, HB2283, HB2386, HB1824, HB1697, HB2164, HB2165

Keywords: renewable energy, solar energy, self-certification, building permits, environmental regulations, HB1593, affordable housing, pet-inclusive housing, pet friendly housing, rental housing, affordable rental housing, HHFDC, Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation, tenant pets, companion animals, dogs, cats, landlord-tenant law, security deposit, pet deposit

Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1984 HD2, which would require government entities issuing building permits to create a self-certification process for certain behind-the-meter rooftop solar and energy storage systems, allowing approved applicants to proceed without waiting for standard permit review. The Public Utilities Commission and DLNR offered comments, and the Hawaii Solar Energy Association, Holoholo Energy, Photon Works Engineering, Malama Solar, RevoluSun, and others testified in strong support. Supporters said the bill would reduce permitting delays, lower costs, and help meet Hawaii’s renewable energy goals while still relying on licensed engineers, electricians, and county inspections for safety. Committee members asked about risk, existing county pilot programs, and whether self-certification had been used before; witnesses said the professional liability remains with licensed signers and that current automated review systems often flag minor issues that slow projects. The committee also noted 16 additional written testimonies in support. The committee then took up HB 1593 HD1, which would require HHFDC-financed affordable rental housing projects to allow residents to own or keep common household pets. The Hawaiian Humane Society testified that the bill is a top priority because housing restrictions are a major reason pets are surrendered and because many unhoused residents with pets avoid housing that does not allow animals. In response to questions, the Humane Society said concerns about pet-related damage are overstated, suggested pet behavior screening as a safeguard, and said it would be willing to work on broader private-market pet-friendly housing policies. Members raised concerns about whether allowing pets in public housing could create problems for residents who later transition to the private market, and the witness said California has a similar law and no major negative effects had been identified. Finally, the committee heard HB 2423 HD2, which would require that by January 1, 2028, diesel fuel sold in Hawaii for on-highway vehicles contain at least 5% biodiesel by volume. The Hawaii State Energy Office offered comments, and Hawaii Transportation Association and Pacific Biodiesel Technologies testified in support. Pacific Biodiesel argued the mandate would improve energy security, stabilize fuel prices amid global supply disruptions, and support local clean-fuel production. In response to questions, the company said its nameplate capacity is 5.5 million gallons per year and it has produced over 6 million gallons annually, but much of its output is tied up in standby generator contracts that can fluctuate. Witnesses said the mandate would provide a stable market signal and could support future investment in expanded local biodiesel production, including agricultural feedstock development and a possible second refinery. No votes or final actions were taken during the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• In Rosemount, they had Project Bigfoot. In Hermantown, it's Project Loon.
• >> [laughter] >> You're<00:25:55.080> clearly<00:25:55.520> not<00:25:55.720
• > a<00:25:55.760> group<00:25:56.040> that<00:25:56.480> usually >>
• :57.120> together<00:25:57.520> a<00:25:57.600> lot.
• <00:25:58.120> What<00:25:58.280> was<00:25:58.440> it<00:25:58.520> like

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: Lawmakers held a bipartisan press availability on a bill to prohibit local governments and their officials from entering into non-disclosure agreements with private entities. Supporters said the measure is intended to protect transparency, public participation, and Minnesotans’ right to know about local decisions involving land use, public financing, and economic development, especially in cases involving data centers and other large projects. Representatives and senators from both parties described the bill as a response to examples in cities such as Rosemount, Farmington, Hermantown, North Mankato, Monticello, Pine Island, and others, where they said NDAs kept communities from learning about projects until decisions were effectively already made. The authors argued that the bill is not anti-development or limited to data centers, but instead prevents corporations from using private contracts to circumvent Minnesota’s open meeting and data practices laws. They said Chapter 13 already addresses trade secrets and other confidential information, and that the bill is meant to stop NDAs from creating secrecy around government decision-making. They also said they had heard little organized opposition so far, though they acknowledged questions about how the bill would affect early-stage business recruitment conversations and how local governments, especially smaller ones, would implement the change. Members also discussed the bill’s legislative path. They said it had previously received unanimous support in committee and was sent to the general register, then moved to the Judiciary Committee at the request of Chair Scott, who wanted a hearing. The authors said they did not believe the bill raised Chapter 13 issues requiring judiciary review, but agreed to the referral as a courtesy and said they were seeking a hearing. They reported that Senate consideration had previously ended in a tie vote, but said momentum was growing and expected stronger support this session. No vote was taken during the press event.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:25:06.320> Line<00:25:06.880> 38<00:25:07.480> is<00:25:07.600> a
• Line<00:25:13.000> 39<00:25:13.520> is<00:25:13.679> a<00:25:13.760> $3,000
• <00:25:15.760> for<00:25:16.400> um<00:25:16.600> I<00:25:16.679> believe
• Um<00:25:20.960> and<00:25:21.080> those<00:25:21.320> are<00:25:21.400> both
• Line<00:25:25.200> 43<00:25:26.600> is<00:25:26.800> a<00:25:26.840> one-time

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And uh<00:25:01.200> I<00:25:01.360> will<00:25:01.560> continue<00:25:02.040>
• and please<00:25:17.920> feel<00:25:18.080> free<00:25:18.240> to<00:25:18.440><
• c> reach<00:25:18.640> out<00:25:18.760> to<00:25:18.880> me<00:25:19.040>
• <00:25:43.320> So,<00:25:44.040> um<00:25:44.520> we<00:25:44.760> agree<
• <00:25:46.640> It's<00:25:46.800> a<00:25:46.920> it's<00:25:47.120> a

Bills: HF495, HF4321, HF3902, HF4161, HF3755

Keywords: day care, tax subtraction, child care costs, licensed child care, dependent care assistance, HF4321, dependent care assistance programs, gross income exclusion, federal conformity, Internal Revenue Code, individual income tax, Minnesota tax law, tax conformity, child care assistance, employer-provided dependent care, taxable income, state income tax, retroactive tax change, family care benefits, housing tax credit

Transcript Highlights:

• to speak<00:25:04.720> up,<00:25:05.520> afraid<00:25:06.000> to<00:25:06.240><
• People<00:25:08.000> are<00:25:08.159> afraid<00:25:08.480> of<00:25:08.640>
• targeted<00:25:12.960> not<00:25:13.200> just<00:25:13.360> by<00:25:13.760>
• AI data centers, but let's kill the offshore<04:25:52.800> wind<04:25:53.040> projects.
• <04:25:53.760> Let's<04:25:54.080> create offshore wind projects.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Thursday, September 18, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:25:23.440> to<00:25:23.679> go<00:25:23.840> into<00:25:24.080> the
• <00:25:30.320> Hawaii<00:25:30.720> Island<00:25:31.039> and<00:25:31.279>
• <00:25:39.600> Happy<00:25:39.840> to<00:25:40.080> talk<00:25:40.240> to
• >> I<00:25:41.600> also<00:25:42.000> have<00:25:42.480> u<00:25:42.720>
• :25:26.640> And<02:25:26.800> it's<02:25:27.040> not<02:25:27.120> a<02:25

Bills: HB2118, HB2473

Keywords: business development, arts, cultural affairs, Hawaii, commissions, administrative transfer, funding appropriation, Hawaiian culture, sense of place, land management, environmental stewardship, cultural preservation, 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard several bills related to permitting and economic development. On HB 2603, relating to permits, the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development said it supported the measure with comments. Committee discussion focused on the fact that the state’s facilitated permit process appears to have been rarely or never used, the need to identify specific projects that would use it, and whether DBEDT would need dedicated staffing to administer it. DBEDT said it had found no projects under the current process, had no capacity to run the program as structured, and estimated it would need about 7 to 9 FTEs, including permitting, coordination, data, systems, and possibly legal support. The chair suggested exploring a staff assignment and comparing the concept to federal FAST-41-style expedited permitting. On HB 2140, relating to essential permitting positions, the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development again supported the bill with comments. Testimony and questioning centered on a pilot program to help counties pay competitively for permitting staff. A DBEDT representative said the issue of competitive pay affected both county and state permitting offices and that the bill was intended as a temporary pilot, though a more permanent solution would be preferable. When asked how counties would fund the salary support, the witness said that was not yet discussed with the counties and agreed to follow up. The committee also noted the bill applies to participating counties. On HB 2598, relating to the Hawaii Technology Development Corporation, the State Procurement Office and HTDC offered comments, and the Department of the Attorney General raised constitutional concerns. The AG said the bill’s residency-based certification requirements, when tied to procurement, could implicate the dormant Commerce Clause, and that the required 1% contribution tied to state contracts raised unconstitutional-conditions concerns. In questioning, the AG characterized these as legal risks rather than automatic lawsuits. The committee did not take a vote. The committee then heard HB 2141, relating to state enterprise zones. Taxation, DBEDT, HCDA, the University of Hawaii Cancer Center, and HTDC testified in support, while the Tax Foundation noted the program was intended to help economically depressed areas create jobs. HTDC said the bill would help preserve the Maui Research and Technology Center’s enterprise-zone status after rezoning. Committee discussion focused on whether the enterprise zone program is being used effectively, how the bill might attract businesses to areas where the state is investing, and whether the program’s labor requirements are too burdensome for new businesses. DBEDT explained that the program requires a 10% workforce increase in the first year, which must be sustained, and said it promotes the program through county coordinators and in-person outreach. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• :00.280> a<01:25:00.440> fair<01:25:00.679> amount<01:25:01.040> of<01:25
• ><01:25:07.880> housing<01:25:08.199> and<01:25:08.400> stability<01:25:08.840><
• in some cases<01:25:20.639> and<01:25:20.800> so<01:25:21.040> on<01:25:22.040><
• c> um<01:25:22.400> and<01:25:22.719> and<01:25:22.920> many<01:25:23.199>
• 25:56.600> uh<01:25:56.800> and<01:25:57.080> and<01:25:57.199> are<01:25

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• >> I<00:25:18.880> think<00:25:18.960> it<00:25:19.120> would<00:25:19.279
• > be<00:25:19.440> great<00:25:19.600> if<00:25:19.840> we<00:25:20.000><
• <00:25:24.240> And<00:25:24.480> I<00:25:24.640> support<00:25:24.880> your
• ><00:25:46.320> not<00:25:46.559> be<00:25:46.720> setting<00:25:47.039> up
• >> Not<00:25:53.679> as<00:25:53.919> far<00:25:54.080> as<00:25:54.159>

Keywords: MS House Floor - 9 February, 2026; 4:00 PM, 925, all

Summary: The House opened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, then established a quorum, dispensed with reading the journal, and welcomed several guests, including Dr. Richard Calderon and medical student Sam Buckley, along with hospital and judicial visitors in the gallery. The chamber then moved to floor action on several bills, mostly from the Workforce Committee. House Bill 622 was brought back on reconsideration, amended to align code sections with changes made by House Bill 3, and passed 119-0. House Bill 329, a reverse-auction option for local school boards and local governments, passed 113-1. House Bills 1401 and 1588, both workforce-related measures extending repeal or exemption dates and adjusting reporting requirements, passed 121-0 and 118-0, respectively. House Bill 562 created the Mississippi Career and Technical Education tuition guarantee program for CTE students and passed 116-0. House Bill 1696 transferred apprenticeship program oversight to a state advisory structure; members questioned how it would work, whether it would affect existing programs, and how it related to specific trades, but the bill passed 113-4 after an amendment to conform to federal requirements. House Bill 338 established a construction training assistant fund supported by a reduced designated contractor contribution rate; members asked about the funding source, whether it was state money, and how it would interact with existing training efforts such as Build Mississippi and Habitat for Humanity. After adopting a committee amendment reducing the contribution percentage, the bill passed 128-0. The House also concurred in a Senate amendment on another bill, making it effective immediately so a state health department hygienist could begin work right away; that motion passed 128-0. The session ended with memorial announcements for several individuals, a request for a rules meeting after adjournment, and adjournment until 10:00 a.m. the next day.

Transcript Highlights:

• procedures,<00:25:07.480> and<00:25:07.720> clean<00:25:08.040> up<00:25:08.520
• > I<00:25:29.800> would<00:25:29.920> like<00:25:30.160> to<00:25:30.600>
• . projects. projects.
• Project Bigfoot, Project Loon, Project Bengal, Project Skyview.
• ,<01:24:48.920> Project Project Loon, Project Bengal, Project Project Loon, Project Bengal

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So >> So<00:25:29.520> what<00:25:29.679> do<00:25:29.760> we<00:25:29.919
• <00:25:30.159> We<00:25:30.799> it's<00:25:31.039> not<00:25:31.200> we
• :00.479> projecting<03:25:00.960> into<03:25:01.279> the<03:25:01.520> future
• <03:25:01.840> because are projecting into the future because are projecting into the future
• > our doesn't come to pass because we our doesn't come to pass because we our projections<03:25

Keywords: 912, senate, all