Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial timeline'
Page 81 of 370
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- But we're going to start with um Senate File 4067, the omnibus judicial branch supplemental appropriations
- Senate File 4067, the omnibus judicial branch supplemental appropriations bill, will be handled first
- the judicial branch branch supplemental<00:02:21.680>
appropriations? - <00:02:41.000>
branch, <00:02:41.920>um judicial branch, um judicial branch, um particularly - c> and particularly the judicial officers, and particularly the judicial officers, and then<00:02
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Disaster Preparedness & Flooding, Select Jul 31st, 2025
Disaster Preparedness & Flooding, Select
Transcript Highlights:
- He will share the timeline of the city's response. to this disaster.
- You gave the timeline and that was very good information.
- And I think on the timeline We had, I think it was about 0-3-30, give or take.
- I've provided you an extended version if you have for our timeline.
- Yeah, I've got that in the timeline. But yes, it took.
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Senate Legislative Session Day 60 (4-15-26) - Part 2
Kentucky Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- be filed against him with the Judicial be filed against him with the Judicial Conduct<01:04:57.360
- >
the <01:20:51.160>Commonwealth The judicial power of the Commonwealth The judicial power - One of my concerns is the doctrine of judicial immunity.
- opinion. judicial opinion.
- <01:31:51.960>
discretion judicial discretion judicial discretion when<01:31:53.560>making
CO
Colorado 2026 Regular Session
Colorado House 2026 Legislative Day 087 Apr 11th, 2026
Colorado House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- <02:16:07.760>
department shall be from the judicial department shall be from the judicial - 1,410, Judicial Department. 1,410, Judicial Department.
- Judicial Education and Training, 4.0 FTE. Judicial Education and Training, 4.0 FTE.
- Commission on Judicial Discipline. Office of Judicial Discipline: 5.0 FTE.
- Commission on Judicial Discipline. Office of Judicial Discipline: 5.0 FTE.
Summary:
The House convened with a quorum, approved the prior journal, and heard several brief recognitions before moving to business. Members welcomed foster care advocates for Child Abuse Prevention Month, Girl Scouts visiting the Capitol, and participants in Black Maternal Health Week, with remarks emphasizing foster youth voice, leadership development, and the need for culturally competent maternal health care and doula/midwife support.
The chamber then took up House Joint Resolution 1026, honoring former Governor Roy Romer and designating a portion of I-25 as the Governor Roy Romer Memorial Highway. Supporters highlighted Romer’s long public service, his work on education and infrastructure, and his role in major state projects. A proposed amendment to strike the word “memorial” was withdrawn, the House suspended the rules to allow Romer to speak from the well, and Romer offered remarks about legislative collegiality and the importance of democracy and listening to opposing views.
House Joint Resolution 1026 was adopted on a 60-0 vote, with four excused and one absent. After a brief recess, the House returned to special orders and resumed reading House Bill 1410 at length, continuing through extensive appropriations language for the Department of Human Services, including child welfare, youth services, Medicaid-related transfers, SNAP and benefits administration, and other funding line items. No final action on House Bill 1410 was taken in the portion provided.
MD
Transcript Highlights:
- Proceedings. >> All right, we will uh reassign that to Judicial Proceedings.
- Uh the third announcement... >> All right, we will uh reassign that to Judicial Proceedings.
- Proceedings. >> All right, bill is ordered reassigned to Judicial Proceedings.
- reassigned to judicial proceedings. reassigned to judicial proceedings.
- We have a fourth judicial proceedings.
Summary:
The Senate held a brief pro forma session, waived reading of the prior journal, and received the first calendar item, Senate Bill 246, which was referred to the appropriate standing committee. The chamber also announced several committee reassignments under Rule 33D.
The reassignments included Senate Bill 18, concerning the State Board of Social Work Examiners, moved to Finance; Senate Bill 42, relating to reduction in facilities and veteran service organizations, moved to Judicial Proceedings; Senate Bill 106, the vehicle emissions inspection program repeal, moved to Judicial Proceedings; Senate Bill 119, the State Board of Environmental Health Specialist sunset extension, moved to Finance; and Senate Bill 186, concerning optometry examination requirements, moved to Finance. The presiding officer noted the reassignment process and joked that the chief of staff had a 98% accuracy rate on initial committee assignments.
No substantive debate or votes on legislation occurred. The Senate thanked the pages for their service, held a quorum call for the pro forma session, and then adjourned without objection until Monday, January 19th at 8:00 p.m.
FL
Transcript Highlights:
- Related to judicial sales and procedures. Senator Garcia, good afternoon.
- Today's Senate Bill 48 is a measure to ensure fairness and transparency in our judicial sales process
- It establishes clear, standardized procedures ...integrity in Florida's judicial sales process.
- The Florida Bar assists the court in ensuring an efficient and effective judicial system.
- The Florida Bar Assist the Court ensuring have an efficient and effective of judicial system.
Summary:
The Judiciary Committee met with a quorum present and Senator Thompson excused. The committee first considered Senate Bill 48 by Senator Garcia on judicial sales and procedures. Garcia explained a delete-all amendment that would create clearer statewide procedures for alternative judicial sales, increase transparency, remove bidding credits, extend sale timelines, and add oversight for auctioneers and escrow agents to prevent fraud and collusion. After no questions or opposition, the amendment was adopted, Senator Pasadoma said the rewrite addressed many of his concerns, and the committee then voted CS for SB 48 favorably with unanimous yes votes from members present.
The committee then received a presentation from the Seminole County Sheriff’s Office on the effectiveness of Florida’s recent anti-squatting law, House Bill 621/SB 888. Presenters described several cases in which deputies used the new process to remove unlawful occupants, including a false landlord report, a long-term fake lease situation, and a more recent unlawful occupancy case. They said the law has helped protect property owners and potential victims, but suggested technical changes: clearer authorization for deputies to enter and use force if needed, and a fix to the affidavit penalty provision because false statements are currently being charged as false reports rather than perjury under the existing wording.
The Florida Bar also presented on its role in regulating lawyers, lawyer advertising, and the unlicensed practice of law. Bar leaders explained that the Bar operates under the Florida Supreme Court’s authority, is funded by member fees, and handles complaints through a multi-step process involving intake, branch offices, grievance committees, referees, and final Supreme Court review. They described advertising review procedures, discipline statistics, consumer assistance, the Clients’ Security Fund, and enforcement against unlicensed practice. Senators asked about the Legislature’s authority over lawyer advertising, the prevalence of legal ads, the role of public members on grievance committees, and how those members are selected and used.
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Courts, Corrections and Justice Jul 1st, 2025
Courts, Corrections & Justice Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- We have stood this up in the First Judicial District.
- The Fourth Judicial District will be operational by July.
- Experience with AOT is even within one judicial district.
- In Las Cruces, two different judicial districts.
- Dona Ana County is one of the pilot districts, so the third judicial district and the fourth judicial
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:30:20.840>
enforcement discretion to seek judicial enforcement discretion to seek judicial - <00:32:23.279>
review H that when an appeal or judicial review H that when an appeal or judicial - judicial judicial review<00:37:00.680>
and <00:37:00.920>and <00:37:01.200>that's - judicial judicial review<00:37:14.440>
and <00:37:14.640>unless <00:37:15.040>you - It was a motion to enforce by the complainant. ...and that's why you have judicial review.
- judicial judicial review<00:37:14.440>
Summary:
The joint hearing covered Senate Bills 470, 828, 730, and 1383. SB 470 would create a deferred retirement option program for police officers. The Employees Retirement System warned it could worsen the system’s $14.1 billion unfunded liability by stopping employer and employee contributions during the DROP period, and the Attorney General raised possible tax-qualified status, Internal Revenue Code, and age-discrimination concerns. Police and other supporters testified in favor, but the committees ultimately recommended deferring the bill indefinitely.
SB 828 would expand workers’ compensation medical benefits for firefighters to cover an additional respiratory condition. The Department of Labor and Industrial Relations and the Hawaii Firefighters Association supported the measure, citing occupational exposure and health risks. The committees recommended passage with amendments, and the motion was adopted by both committees.
SB 730, which concerns allowance on service retirements, drew support from the Department of Human Resources Development and the Department of Law Enforcement, but also comments from the Attorney General and ERS. DHRD said the bill could help recruitment and retention but requested more time to work on language with ERS, Budget and Finance, and the AG’s office. The committees postponed decision-making until Friday, February 7, at 3:15 p.m. in Conference Room 225.
SB 1383, relating to fire protection, received broad support from the Governor’s office, Department of Defense, DLNR, Hawaiian Electric, and others. The committees agreed to pass it with amendments, including language suggested by the Hawaii Insurance Council on wildfire-related insurance issues and a committee report link to the Lina fire forward-looking report, phase three. The amended recommendation was adopted by both committees. Later in the meeting, the committees also heard SB 1360 and SB 1361 on ERS administrative and reporting matters, SB 340 on HLRB enforcement authority, and SB 997 on energy; SB 1360 and SB 1361 were presented as housekeeping measures, SB 340 drew disagreement between the Attorney General and HLRB over enforcement authority, and SB 997 was amended to incorporate prevailing-wage renewable energy rate language from SB 743 and then passed with amendments.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Finance Division I (03/11/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- Bucky from Judicial Council here. Oh, the Judicial Council, yes. Welcome.
- your judicial your judicial Council<00:44:06.400>
the <00:44:06.800>fewer <00:44:07.800 - judicial judicial Council<00:47:12.280>
cover <00:47:13.280>on <00:47:13.559>average - Franklin Pierce that the judicial Franklin Pierce that the judicial Council<00:50:03.760>
had - <00:55:57.480>
Council anybody but in the judicial Council anybody but in the judicial Council
Summary:
The committee first heard from the Department of Labor on several House Bill 2 sections. Members discussed raising the annual elevator certificate fee, which had been $50 since at least fiscal year 2014; the commissioner said the Inspection Division generates more revenue than its costs, and members agreed to amend the fee to $75 and later voted unanimously to accept Section 137. The department also explained a proposed change to civil penalty/warning language in Section 139 to align enforcement across labor laws; that section was accepted unanimously. The commissioner then gave a detailed overview of the second injury fund, describing how it is financed by assessments on insurance carriers, how claims are reviewed for reimbursement, and how the fund is intended to reimburse certain workers’ compensation costs. Members questioned whether the program still serves its original purpose, whether it is revenue-neutral, and whether it should be sunset; the department said the fund is a mixed bag for the state and industry, but no sunset language was adopted. Sections 140 and 141 were then accepted unanimously.
The committee next heard from the Judicial Council on Sections 125 through 127. The witness said the changes would streamline payment for indigent defense services other than counsel, reduce the number of bills requiring judge review, and expand the council’s ability to contract with providers for services such as translation and evaluations. He also explained a proposed fail-safe allowing the executive director to decline to process questionable invoices and send them to a judge instead. Members generally supported the streamlining, and Sections 125 through 127 were accepted unanimously.
Toward the end of the discussion, members asked about the cost impact of changing the misdemeanor/felony threshold from $1,000 to a higher amount. The Judicial Council said felony cases are significantly more expensive than misdemeanors because they involve more hearings, more discovery, and more attorney time, with assigned felony cases costing several times more on average. No action was taken on that question in the excerpt.
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Budget Review Subcommittee on Justice and Judiciary (8-20-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- Judge Gabart 14th Judicial Circuit.
- reduce recidivism through judicial reduce recidivism through judicial oversight<00:03:07.120>
- Your last judicial budget gave us that.
- But having judicial oversight over it.
- We looked into the judicial communities.
Summary:
The subcommittee received an overview of Kentucky’s specialty courts from Audrey Collins of the Department of Specialty Courts and the Administrative Office of the Courts, along with testimony from Christian County District Judge Foster Cutoff. Collins described the mission and structure of drug, mental health, and veterans treatment courts, emphasizing therapeutic jurisprudence, individualized treatment, judicial oversight, and multidisciplinary teams. She said Kentucky currently has about 2,991 active participants across the three court types, with drug courts in all 120 counties, mental health courts in 17 counties, and veterans treatment courts in eight counties. She also highlighted reported outcomes such as 7,658 entrants and 4,384 successful completions from 2020 to 2024, a five-year average completion rate of 57%, and lower recidivism among graduates than the statewide average.
Collins also reviewed funding and costs, saying the department’s fiscal year 2025 budget was $18.6 million, with most of it from general funds, plus restricted and federal funds. She noted spending on personnel, treatment services, and drug testing, and said specialty courts allow participants to remain employed and meet obligations such as child support and restitution. She said participants paid more than $5.4 million in child support, restitution, and other court-related obligations over five years, and that a statewide evaluation by Morehead State University is underway. In response to questions, she said a dip in 2024 collections may have been affected by a case management system overhaul, and that court costs can be waived in some indigent cases while restitution is still required.
Judge Cutoff described veterans treatment court and mental health court in Christian County, saying the programs are especially important because of the nearby Fort Campbell military community and because they help veterans with PTSD, traumatic brain injury, substance use, and related issues. He said the courts rely heavily on staff, treatment providers, and the VA, which helps connect participants to benefits and therapy. He also said mental health court participants receive housing, benefits, and medication support, and that the programs can keep people out of jail and help them stabilize. Committee members asked about the legal basis and history of the courts, and Collins explained that Kentucky’s specialty courts began as pilot programs in the mid-1990s, shifted from federal support to state funding around 2008-2009, and are now largely state funded. No votes or formal actions were taken during the discussion.
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
House Standing Committee BR Sub. on Justice, Public Safety, & Judiciary (3-4-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- judicial judicial oversight<00:08:12.199>
we <00:08:12.400>realize <00:08:13.000>that - I'm a family court judge in the 28th Judicial Circuit.
- I'm a family court judge in the 28th Judicial Circuit.
- uh have an interplay with the judicial uh have an interplay with the judicial branch<00:54:47.000
- <00:55:13.119>
branch critical role within the judicial branch critical role within the judicial
Summary:
The subcommittee met to discuss the guardian ad litem system, including appointment qualifications, training, payment, and whether any changes are needed. Roll was called, the February 25, 2025 minutes were approved, and the chair emphasized that the meeting was informational only and no vote would be taken. Representatives from the Court of Justice, including Chief Justice Deborah Henry Lambert and several family and district judges, testified about how the system has evolved since concerns raised in 2019 about overappointment and fees.
Court witnesses said the judiciary responded to earlier concerns by requiring open appointment lists of trained and qualified attorneys, improving training, and increasing oversight of fee orders. They reported that statewide GAL fees have fallen from a little over $14 million in 2019 to about $12 million, even as caseloads have grown, and said the average payment works out to about $650 per case, with the statutory cap for trial-level GAL fees still set at $500 since 1986. They argued that the current local appointment model works well, especially in rural areas, and warned that moving to a DPA-style regional model would create serious scheduling and conflict problems because of overlapping dockets and related criminal cases.
Judges from rural districts described shortages of available attorneys, high burnout, travel burdens, and the difficulty of finding enough counsel in smaller counties. They also said the Court of Justice cannot seek certain federal Title IV-E reimbursements, but urged the legislature to encourage the Finance and Administration Cabinet and the Cabinet for Health and Family Services to pursue that funding through an MOU. One judge noted that some appointed attorneys are effectively underpaid relative to private rates and that better compensation would help attract and retain lawyers.
The discussion also covered training standards adopted after the 2019 audit. Witnesses said Rule 37 now requires initial training and four hours of multidisciplinary continuing training every two years, with topics including child development, trauma-informed care, substance use, child welfare, forensics, ethics, and communication with clients. They said the Court of Justice has offered in-person regional trainings and remote options, and that the goal is to keep qualified attorneys on the appointment lists while improving representation for children and parents in dependency, neglect, abuse, and termination-of-parental-rights cases.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- body so and I'll be available judicial body so and I'll be available to<00:22:01.600>
answer < - Under the statute, the party adversely affected by one of our orders has the right to judicial review
- Judiciary instead of having one judicial Judiciary instead of having one judicial review<00:24:49.159
- review and the circuit through judicial review and the circuit court<00:25:08.880>
has <00:25: - jurisdiction when it goes for judicial jurisdiction when it goes for judicial review<00:28:11.600
NM
New Mexico 2026 Regular Session
House - Appropriations and Finance Jan 14th, 2026 at 02:14 pm
House Appropriations & Finance
Transcript Highlights:
- My name is Henry Jacobs, and I'm the LLC analyst for the Judicial Standards Commission.
- The Judicial Standards Commission is the sole judicial ethics commission.
- And when a matter of judicial misconduct or failure of inability to perform judicial duties comes before
- In that respect, the commission does have a kind of quasi-judicial authority.
- Also, like the Judicial Standards, the Ethics Commission is a constitutional agency.
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Senate Legislative Session Day 59 (4-14-26) - Part 2
Kentucky Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- by jeopardizing judicial branch by jeopardizing well-established<01:25:20.640>
funding <01:25: - <01:25:34.000>
branch the veto message, the judicial branch the veto message, the judicial - for the judicial branch. for the judicial branch.
- branch and therefore I respect judicial branch and therefore I respect uh, uh, uh, with<01:26:23.160
- will of the Senate that the the Judicial will of the Senate that the the Judicial Conduct<01:34:
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Republican Press Conference 3/5/25
Transcript Highlights:
- This was judicially created in self-defense.
- Nowhere does it say that the judicial branch can insert language into existing statutes.
- This was judicially created in self-defense.
- Nowhere does it say that the judicial branch can insert language into existing statutes.
- <00:02:06.399>
and judicial and judicial and executive<00:02:08.679>the <00:02:08.840><
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- And the judicial system knows about kids that have had their licenses revoked or have outstanding fines
- kids.<00:46:47.280>
And <00:46:47.680>uh <00:46:47.839>the <00:46:48.079>judicial - And uh the judicial system knows kids.
- And uh the judicial system knows about<00:46:49.599>
kids <00:46:49.920>that <00:46:50.160 - documentation requirements under the new project scope and purpose and need development requirements, a timeline
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2025-04-08
Judiciary Finance and Civil Law
Transcript Highlights:
- On line 63, the Board of Judicial Standards came in with a base of $645,000 per year.
- These sections are from the underlying House File 2300, which was the judicial branch's bill carried
- Section 12 is also from the judicial branch bill carried by Representative Scott.
- This has the updated definition that does not include employees of the Minnesota Judicial Branch.
- I'm going to speak to the judicial safety provisions in the bill, which are under Article 5, Section
Bills:
HF2300
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session 5/18/25 - Part 2
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:26:33.840>
vacancies position, but for judicial vacancies position, but for judicial vacancies - across all of our judicial circuits. across all of our judicial circuits. >> Yeah.
- You have to go to the judicial selection committee.
- <00:32:15.840>
You <00:32:16.000>have judicial selection committee. - You have judicial selection committee.
Keywords:
civil rights, helpline, investigator, data analysis, Aloha United Way, reporting, confidentiality, community support, mandatory retirement, Hawaii Constitution, judiciary, justices, judges, 912, senate, all
Summary:
The Judiciary Committee heard SB 2055, which would create a Civil Rights Commission helpline for reports of harms from federal deployments in Hawaii and require annual reporting and a public hearing. The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission supported the concept but said the bill should be broadened to cover civil rights and human rights violations more generally, and recommended using existing 211/Aloha United Way infrastructure. Testimony was largely in support, with a few opponents. Members focused on whether the proposed line was really a 24-hour legal hotline or a reporting/referral mechanism, what jurisdiction the commission would have over federal employees, and the estimated costs. The committee chair indicated the bill would move forward with amendments, including adopting HCRC recommendations and adding appropriations for Aloha United Way, database/website development, and staffing.
The committee then heard SB 2152, a proposed constitutional amendment to raise the mandatory retirement age for state judges and justices from 70 to 75. Judge Robert D.S. Kim, the Office of the Public Defender, Earthjustice, Community Alliance on Prisons, the State of Hawaii Organization of Police Officers, United Public Workers, the League of Women Voters, ILWU Local 142, CARES, and others testified in support, arguing that experienced judges improve stability, reduce vacancies, and preserve institutional knowledge. Opponents or skeptical comments were limited, but one member questioned whether the measure was just a temporary fix rather than a broader solution to judicial succession and mentoring.
Members also asked about existing retention and fitness safeguards, including Judicial Selection Commission retention hearings and the Commission on Judicial Conduct’s ability to investigate complaints about a judge’s physical or mental ability to serve. The discussion noted that the measure would still leave those processes in place. No final vote on SB 2152 was taken in the portion provided, but the committee appeared to be moving toward decision-making after questions concluded.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Elections Committee Jul 16th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- Judicial retention elections can add more than a dozen additional contests to the ballot.
- This bill would address a real challenge that we see in judicial retention elections.
- But without dedicated funding for meaningful judicial evaluation, our efforts can only go so far.
- The League has a long history of advocating for judicial independence and accountability.
- The League has a long history of advocating for judicial independence and accountability.
Summary:
The Assembly Elections Committee met on July 16, 2025, and heard five measures focused on election administration, voter participation, judicial retention elections, charitable solicitation by officials, and local transportation tax initiatives. The chair noted the committee’s rules for limited witness testimony and accepted written testimony through the legislative portal. Several authors presented their bills in person or through a committee member due to scheduling conflicts.
SB 3 by Senator Cervantes would tighten and clarify the ballot signature-cure process, including requiring standardized forms from election officials and adding a reminder on vote-by-mail envelopes about signature matching. Supporters said the bill would reduce rejected ballots and make the process more reliable; there was no opposition. The committee voted do pass as amended and re-refer to Appropriations. SB 316 by Senator Reyes, presented by Assembly Member Pellerin, would expand high school voter registration and pre-registration outreach to students, with testimony from students, education groups, disability advocates, and civic organizations in support. One member opposed on the grounds that it could be an unfunded mandate for schools. The bill passed 4-1.
ACA 8 by Assembly Member Pellerin would change appellate and Supreme Court judicial retention elections so justices would appear on the ballot only if voters file a petition requesting it. Supporters, including the Secretary of State, the League of Women Voters, and the California Judges Association, said it would reduce ballot length, voter fatigue, and costs while preserving accountability. One member raised concern about the future petition threshold and the possibility it could be set too high, and voted no. The measure passed 4-2. SB 760 by Senator Allen would narrow behested payment reporting requirements for public appeals to charities, especially in disaster response, while preserving disclosure where officials, family members, or staff have conflicts of interest. Good-government groups supported the bill as a balance between transparency and encouraging charitable appeals; it passed unanimously on the recorded vote.
SB 512 by Senator Perez would clarify that voters in transportation districts may use citizen initiatives to propose transportation sales taxes where the district already has taxing authority. Supporters argued it aligns Elections Code with Proposition 218 and recent case law, while opponents from business and real estate groups objected to the measure’s implications for tax approval rules. The committee approved the bill 5-2. After calling absent members, the committee cleared the calendar and adjourned.