Transcript Highlights:

• Chair, Representative Silva, for fiscal year 25—or was that 24? For 25?
• Chair and Representative Silva, that was a fiscal year 24 reversion. Oh, okay.
• So the numbers are correct, but it was in the wrong fiscal year?
• This is for our fiscal year 26 initiatives.
• Right now for fiscal year 25, why is it not represented?

Bills: HB1

Keywords: feed bill, legislative appropriations, legislative branch, New Mexico Legislature, general fund, legislative council service, legislative finance committee, legislative education study committee, house chief clerk, senate chief clerk, per diem, mileage, session expenses, interim committees, district staff, capitol complex, capital outlay data system, legislative processing system, redistricting, census redistricting

Transcript Highlights:

• our section, our fiscal head of fiscal, our section, our fiscal head of fiscal, our head<01:13:19.920
• For fiscal year 25, we had 393,07 and fiscal year 26568 and 7.
• So how many fiscal years was this?
• This is since the initiation in fiscal year 23 through fiscal year 26. Okay.
• >> a year fiscal year. >> a year fiscal year.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That data was done from our analysis in another state.
• fiscal capital related to SUD. fiscal capital related to SUD.
• A recent actuarial analysis utilization.
• Doulas improve outcomes that are both morally urgent and fiscally significant.
• are both morally urgent and fiscally are both morally urgent and fiscally significant.<01:13:00.320

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Medicaid Oversight Advisory Board met with a quorum, approved the November 12 minutes by voice vote, and then heard a presentation from former Governor Ernie Fletcher and Dave Johnson on Medicaid reimbursement for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. Fletcher argued that addiction should be treated as a chronic disease requiring a longer continuum of care, not just short residential stays, and said recovery should combine clinical treatment with social supports such as housing, transportation, employment, peer coaching, and recovery housing. He cited data on overdose trends, low treatment rates, and high costs for people with SUD, and said current reimbursement models create poor incentives and do not adequately support long-term recovery or measure outcomes well. Fletcher proposed a “carve through” model administered at the MCO level with standardized metrics, data sharing, and an independent recovery coordinator that would assess patients, coordinate care, and connect them to clinical and social recovery services. He suggested using bundled payments, shared savings, and partial risk arrangements, with recovery housing reimbursed on a PMPM or weekly basis and funded in part through existing Medicaid spending and other sources such as opioid abatement funds. He also emphasized peer support, telemedicine, criminal justice coordination, workforce and education supports, and the use of technology, including text messaging and possibly AI, to maintain long-term follow-up and identify relapse risk. Members questioned how the model would work in practice, especially the education and staffing requirements for recovery coordinators, reimbursement levels, and how many patients each coordinator or peer would serve. Fletcher said peers could be certified and would need additional training in assessments such as ASAM and recovery residence standards, but he did not give a precise salary figure, saying the market and bundled rates would determine that. He also said follow-up should continue for years, noting relapse risk over the first 18 to 24 months and that meaningful employment and ongoing peer contact help sustain recovery. No formal vote or action was taken on the substance use presentation.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, the specific requests for 85 beds came from a pretty extensive market analysis and internal analysis
• Um so we looked at internal analysis.
• I will say certainly do a fiscal note.
• so I'm curious about the fiscal so I'm curious about the fiscal component<00:40:49.839> of
• <01:04:41.039> note Um, and I don't see a fiscal note Um, and I don't see a fiscal note attached

Bills: HF3521, HF1807, HF1270, HF2070, HF3136

Keywords: hospital moratorium, hospital construction, bed capacity, hospital expansion, health care facilities, hospital licensing, safety-net hospital, level I trauma center, Ramsey County, Minnesota health law, hospital beds, new hospital exception, certificate of need, inpatient capacity, emergency care, trauma services, health system regulation, state moratorium, hospital modernization, health infrastructure

Transcript Highlights:

• Do we have a fiscal note or a fiscal impact if this would cost anything if we did this?
• That's why there's no fiscal note. This really shouldn't be difficult to implement.
• <00:19:05.120> note<00:19:05.360> or<00:19:05.480> a<00:19:05.600> fiscal
• do we have a fiscal note or a fiscal do we have a fiscal note or a fiscal impact<00:19:07.080>
• note this really there's no fiscal note this really shouldn't<00:19:59.559> be<00:20:00.000><

Keywords: 00:00 Call to Order 01:55 Attendance Roll Call 02:10 HB 422 Discussion 03:35 HB 422 Vote 04:55 HB 6 Discussion 11:30 HB 6 Vote 16:45 HB 87 Discussion 20:22 HB 87 Vote 21:43 HB 255 Discussion 24:33 HB 255 Vote 26:19 HB 437 Discussion 29:09 HB 437 Vote 30:25 Adjournment, 958, all

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 6, sponsored by Rep. Wade Williams, which would require administrative regulations with a major economic impact of $500,000 or more over two years to go through the legislature. Williams argued the bill would rein in regulatory overreach, improve transparency, and still allow emergency regulations. Several members raised concerns about executive-branch authority and the role of subject-matter experts, while others supported the bill as a way to improve communication and legislative oversight. The bill passed on a roll call vote and was sent to the House floor. The committee then considered House Bill 87, sponsored by Rep. Emily Callaway, with a committee substitute adopted first. The bill is aimed at reducing barriers for people with felony records who are seeking occupational licenses, while preserving existing public hiring practices for cities and counties. Callaway said the changes were mostly technical and intended to make the process more transparent, with no fiscal impact. The committee approved the bill, and it passed with the committee substitute. House Bill 255, sponsored by Rep. Amy Neighbors, also passed with a committee substitute. The measure updates and modernizes the Kentucky Board of Physical Therapy statutes, which sponsors said have not been substantially revised since 1958. Supporters said the bill clarifies outdated language, defines terms more clearly, and better reflects current practice, including physical therapist assistants. The chairman noted the long effort to update the practice act and praised the work of the stakeholders involved. Finally, House Bill 437, sponsored by Rep. Tony Hampton, was presented as a cleanup bill for alcohol beverage control law. It would limit state and local ABC administrators and investigators from making arrests unless they are POP certified, while leaving their other authority intact. Hampton and supporting witnesses said the change would align the statute with other law enforcement certification requirements and help keep civilian administrators from being put in harm’s way. The transcript ends during discussion of this bill, with no final vote shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• shows that civil Legal benefit analysis shows that civil Legal Services<00:31:16.720> deliver
• plan but when we heard about the fiscal plan but when we heard about the fiscal forecast<00:39:32.880
• <00:40:01.000> year 4167 million and then in fiscal year 4167 million and then in fiscal year
• and data analysis.
• and data analysis.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Senator Anthony: The analysis also points to an estimated $55 to $80 million that's avoided in terms
• Investments in these prevention efforts are both fiscally responsible and morally necessary.
• This is public safety, but it's also fiscally responsible.
• But Force Detroit's cost-per-shooting analysis estimates that nonfatal shootings cost the government
• Ultimately, I view CVI as this: it's a rare policy space where community safety, fiscal responsibility

Summary: The Senate Committee on Civil Rights, Judiciary, and Public Safety met with a quorum and adopted the June 4, 2026 minutes. The committee first took up Senate Bill 712, adopting the S-2 substitute, which expands residency requirements to include adjoining districts and removes a provision allowing a district to appoint someone employed by the district. The committee then reported SB 712 to the floor. It also considered House Bills 4025 and 4026, described as safe storage tax exemption bills; the committee heard one supportive written card and reported both bills to the floor, each on a 5-1 vote. The committee next heard testimony on Senate Bill 885, which would create a statewide Parent and Child Legal Representation Commission and Office within LARA to address child protective legal representation. Senator Singh and Alicia Moon of the Michigan Supreme Court described the current county-by-county system as uneven, with attorney shortages, inconsistent pay, and limited specialized training. They said the bill would set standards for training, caseloads, client contact, and compensation, while requiring public comment and future appropriations before implementation. Testimony and written cards from a broad range of organizations and judges supported the measure, and the committee reported SB 885 to the floor on a 6-0 vote. The committee then heard extensive testimony on Senate Bills 1015 and 1016, which would create an Office of Community Violence Intervention and Prevention within MDHHS and establish a grant program to support community violence intervention efforts statewide. Sponsors and witnesses from Force Detroit, D-Live, Seize the Smoke, Advance Peace, public health, law enforcement, and advocacy groups described CVI as a public health and public safety strategy that reduces shootings, supports survivors, and saves public costs. Several witnesses cited local data showing reductions in shootings and homicides in Detroit and Lansing, while one witness from the Michigan Sheriff's Association opposed the bills as written. The committee voted to report both SB 1015 and SB 1016 to the floor, each on a 5-0 vote with one pass, and then adjourned after additional testimony and reading of support cards.

Transcript Highlights:

• I think there were 27 pages of analysis there, and one of the things that I noted in that analysis was
• It's a ...discussed in the analysis is wrong.
• So I think that the analysis is both misleading and perhaps incomplete.
• doctrine perspective, but also a state actor analysis.
• done, nowhere in that analysis do... ...some kind of an economic impact analysis done.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• the Cabinet for Finance, we have looked at the number of fees that have been charged in this past fiscal
• year and the number of cases fiscal year and the number of cases overall<00:08:38.919> it<00:
• So currently in fiscal year 25, the General Assembly has appropriated $12.3 million in fiscal year 25
• on where we got to today but each fiscal on where we got to today but each fiscal year<00:43:24.480
• <00:44:41.559> year million in fiscal year million in fiscal year 25<00:44:43.960> and<

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The subcommittee met to discuss the guardian ad litem system, including appointment qualifications, training, payment, and whether any changes are needed. Roll was called, the February 25, 2025 minutes were approved, and the chair emphasized that the meeting was informational only and no vote would be taken. Representatives from the Court of Justice, including Chief Justice Deborah Henry Lambert and several family and district judges, testified about how the system has evolved since concerns raised in 2019 about overappointment and fees. Court witnesses said the judiciary responded to earlier concerns by requiring open appointment lists of trained and qualified attorneys, improving training, and increasing oversight of fee orders. They reported that statewide GAL fees have fallen from a little over $14 million in 2019 to about $12 million, even as caseloads have grown, and said the average payment works out to about $650 per case, with the statutory cap for trial-level GAL fees still set at $500 since 1986. They argued that the current local appointment model works well, especially in rural areas, and warned that moving to a DPA-style regional model would create serious scheduling and conflict problems because of overlapping dockets and related criminal cases. Judges from rural districts described shortages of available attorneys, high burnout, travel burdens, and the difficulty of finding enough counsel in smaller counties. They also said the Court of Justice cannot seek certain federal Title IV-E reimbursements, but urged the legislature to encourage the Finance and Administration Cabinet and the Cabinet for Health and Family Services to pursue that funding through an MOU. One judge noted that some appointed attorneys are effectively underpaid relative to private rates and that better compensation would help attract and retain lawyers. The discussion also covered training standards adopted after the 2019 audit. Witnesses said Rule 37 now requires initial training and four hours of multidisciplinary continuing training every two years, with topics including child development, trauma-informed care, substance use, child welfare, forensics, ethics, and communication with clients. They said the Court of Justice has offered in-person regional trainings and remote options, and that the goal is to keep qualified attorneys on the appointment lists while improving representation for children and parents in dependency, neglect, abuse, and termination-of-parental-rights cases.

Transcript Highlights:

• Yes, I am accepting the amendments on page five of the analysis.
• If everyone else must practice fiscal... ...piecemeal after-the-fact approach.
• It's all about encouraging fiscal discipline.
• Like, it would be nice to have a cost-benefit analysis.
• That is an analysis that the CPUC is doing outside of Section 851.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• . ...the thoughtful feedback and will be accepting the committee's amendments as outlined in the analysis
• with me to answer any technical questions is Mike Fine, the chief executive officer of California's Fiscal
• We greatly appreciate the thorough analysis and efforts of the committee and sincerely thank the author
• are added to the database helps limit information gaps between employers and also addresses a major fiscal
• are added to the database helps limit information gaps between employers and also addresses a major fiscal

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• was very pleased about is the mandatory board action reserve account fiduciary management, to be fiscally
• they've gained a lot of property value, what have you, but it doesn't necessarily make financial, fiscal
• sense for them to move out of that home. ...but it doesn't necessarily make financial, fiscal sense
• referred to meritless litigation, Assemblymember, and I think when you read the amendments in this analysis
• According to a UC Merced analysis from 2025, ...especially felt in the workplace.

Summary: The Assembly Judiciary Committee heard a series of bills, many focused on homeowners associations (HOAs), along with measures on self-defense, design-professional litigation, mobile home park claims, senior housing, and DEI. Several bills were presented only or discussed with amendments, and the committee repeatedly noted ongoing work with authors and stakeholders. The committee also established quorum partway through the hearing and took up a consent calendar of several unrelated bills, which passed. AB 2584, on civil immunity for lawful self-defense, was presented as a work-in-progress. The author and a UFC/public-safety witness argued that people hesitate to intervene because of fear of civil liability, while committee members said California already has strong self-defense and Good Samaritan laws and that the proposal could create confusion. The bill was not advanced at that time, with the chair emphasizing further conversations. AB 1684, which would prevent HOAs from restricting homeowners’ ability to install or replace compliant cooling systems, drew support from the author, a constituent statement, and supporters from the California Department Association and others; an HOA group opposed unless amended, citing association property rights and grid/power concerns. Members generally supported the concept, and the author said amendments addressed damage and code-compliance issues. AB 1892, a technical cleanup bill clarifying HOA duties on utility repairs, election notices, and electronic voting timelines, passed unanimously as amended. AB 2050, requiring a formula for HOA reserve funding and a phase-in period, also passed with broad support; witnesses said underfunded reserves lead to special assessments, insurance and mortgage problems, and deferred maintenance, while members framed it as a consumer-protection and affordability measure. AB 2106, extending certificate-of-merit protections for design professionals and requiring California-licensed experts in certain cases, passed with strong support from engineers, architects, landscape architects, and civil-justice groups. AB 2145, directing HCD to study seniors’ need and desire to downsize, passed after lenders and financial groups moved from opposition to neutral with amendments; supporters said it could help unlock larger homes for younger families. AB 2238, aimed at deterring meritless failure-to-maintain lawsuits against mobile home park owners by shifting fee exposure to attorneys, passed after amendments narrowed its focus. Supporters said some firms were using vague demand letters and frivolous claims to force settlements and raise insurance costs; opposition said the bill still needed refinement to protect meritorious resident claims. AB 2439, prompted by two authors’ own HOA payment problems, passed despite opposition concerns about community-wide certified-mail requirements and personal liability for board members; supporters said better notice is needed when payment processors change and that liens and collections can be unfairly imposed without notice. AB 2579, responding to the earlier $100 cap on HOA fines, passed as amended to create a Department of Real Estate process for serious health and safety violations; supporters said the cap had weakened enforcement, while members said the bill sought a better balance. Finally, SCR 89, reaffirming California’s commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion, was presented as a response to federal attacks on DEI programs. The author and witnesses from the UC Student Association, National Action Network, and civil-rights and labor groups argued DEI is essential to fairness, access, and opportunity, especially for students and historically underserved communities. Members voiced strong support, describing DEI as central to California’s values, and the resolution moved forward with bipartisan support noted by the author.

Transcript Highlights:

• needed for an inspection, how these changes affect inspection timeliness, or completed a staffing analysis
• That wasn't something that we had access to in our analysis, but DOH may be able to answer that.
• That is why our initial strategy will be to complete an analysis of the existing laws by December 2026
• Like with adverse health events, we expect to complete this necessary analysis, then put forward a plan
• So again, exploring ways to reduce our fiscal kind of liability within that legal structure.

Summary: The committee heard a JLARC presentation on the Department of Health’s oversight of hospital inspections, complaints, and reporting. JLARC said DOH was late on 72% of acute care hospital inspections as of December 2024, had not verified that third-party accrediting standards were substantially equivalent to state standards, did not consistently require proof of those inspections, did not review adverse health event corrective plans, and could make hospital data more accessible. JLARC also raised a possible language-access barrier in the complaint system. Members asked about complaint filing by staff, the meaning of adverse health events, inspection outcomes, and whether the audit compared DOH to other agencies. JLARC said it had not reviewed inspection results or cross-agency comparisons, but noted inspectors were dedicated and working long hours. DOH later said it concurred with the recommendations and outlined a strategic plan with target dates for improving timeliness, verifying accreditation standards, expanding language access, reviewing adverse event laws, and improving public data access, with annual reporting to the Legislature expected. The committee then heard a Department of Health presentation on certificate of need modernization. DOH described the current certificate of need process, which reviews need, financial feasibility, quality, and cost containment for certain facility changes and new services, and said the program has not been modernized since the 1980s. DOH proposed 10 statutory modernization recommendations, including clarifying the program’s purpose, creating a planning entity, adding flexibility, reducing legal costs, updating access-to-care standards, expanding oversight to freestanding emergency departments and urgent care, addressing equity, improving cost control coordination, strengthening long-term funding, and using better data systems. Members asked about oversight of freestanding urgent care and EDs, funding sources, and whether the process could be streamlined or made more responsive to complaints or other triggers. A third panel discussed artificial intelligence in health care. Lucy O’Rourke of the Coalition for Health AI described CHAI’s work on responsible AI principles, technical standards, model cards or “nutrition labels,” testing and governance tools, and educational resources for providers. She said the group is focused on trust, transparency, fairness, safety, security, and privacy, and noted Washington’s AI-related policy work as among the more progressive in the country. No questions were asked. The final portion focused on the financial impact of federal and state health care policy changes. The Washington State Hospital Association said hospitals are facing low or negative operating margins, service reductions, layoffs, and closures, and that state cuts and taxes enacted in 2025, combined with federal HR1 changes, will significantly worsen finances. Providence Swedish leaders described staffing reductions, service cuts, delayed capital investments, and pressure from denials, tariffs, and reimbursement changes, while emphasizing that frontline staffing cuts are tied to service reductions rather than nurse-to-patient ratio changes. The Washington Health Benefit Exchange then began a presentation on expiring federal ACA premium tax credits, state Cascade Care Savings assistance, and eligibility changes affecting lawfully present non-citizens, with examples showing large premium increases for customers if federal subsidies expire.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair, can you give me a fiscal diagram? We have a lot of moving parts in this bill, okay?
• The initial FIR estimated the fiscal impact to be like a million or two a year.
• Kramer Winningham on an economic contribution analysis.
• We conducted this analysis by county to show the investments made.
• This contribution analysis will not be presented here. And you have it electronically.

Transcript Highlights:

• <01:56:49.960> wanting<01:56:50.360> fiscal and not just fiscal wanting fiscal and
• not just fiscal wanting fiscal spending<01:56:51.520> that<01:56:51.639> there<01:56:51.760
• There's often data collection and analysis cost.
• There's often data collection and analysis cost.
• There's often data collection and analysis cost.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first discussed scheduling and notice for upcoming executive sessions on a larger slate of bills, including plans to take up eight bills in the morning and possibly the last three bills in the afternoon, with caucus time provided if needed. The chair emphasized advance notice, publication, and flexibility if more bills are added later. The hearing then opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and proceeded to HB 568, a bill allowing local planning boards to request water supply studies for subdivisions to ensure water adequacy as housing density increases. Representative Kat McGee, the prime sponsor, said HB 568 was developed after constituent concerns about private wells being affected by nearby development. She described the bill as narrowly tailored, non-mandatory, and intended to preserve local control while clarifying that planning boards may request studies under local regulations. She noted bipartisan support, an exclusion for community water systems and larger groundwater withdrawals regulated elsewhere, and said the bill would help prevent water shortages and related problems for new and existing homes. Questions from members focused on whether the bill should specify that it applies to subdivisions of four or more lots, since that language had been in an earlier version. Testimony on HB 568 was mixed. Bob Quinn of the New Hampshire Association of Realtors opposed the bill, arguing it lacked a definition of “water supply study,” could lead to expensive hydrology studies, and might raise housing costs; he suggested more work with DES or a study committee. DES administrator Brandon Kernin said the department had worked from a 2010 groundwater commission report, that such problems arise only intermittently in certain areas, and that the bill would make explicit local authority to adopt such ordinances. He also said DES data and homeowner surveys can help identify problem areas and that more robust wells could be considered in the long term. The committee noted 10 online submissions in favor and 3 opposed, plus blue-sheet testimony of 2 in favor and 1 neutral, and then closed the hearing on HB 568. The committee immediately opened HB 582, a bill on safety requirements for operation of personal watercraft. Representative Darby, the sponsor, said the bill responds to the speed and maneuverability of modern personal watercraft, which he described as more like motorcycles on water than traditional boats, and cited a fatal accident on Lake Monomonac as an example of the risks. He said the bill is not intended to restrict ordinary recreation or wake surfing, but to update safety standards for a newer class of larger, quieter three-person PWCs. The hearing began with Darby’s presentation, and no vote or final action was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• . >> Senator, this being the last day of the fiscal year, doing our first extender here, can you enlighten
• >> SENATOR, THIS BEING THE LAST DAY OF THE FISCAL YEAR, DOING OUR FIRST EXTENDER HERE, CAN YOU
• BY: SENATOR ZELLNER MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MARCH 20, 2026, AS BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS
• DAY IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OBSERVANCE OF WORLD BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS DAY.
• >> APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS OR ABA IS A RESEARCH-BASED APPROACH GROUNDED IN THE SCIENCE OF HUMAN

Keywords: 993, senate, all

Summary: The Senate convened, approved the prior journal, and then took up a Rules Committee report advancing several bills directly to third reading, including Senate Print 9630, an appropriations extender for government operations, and Senate Print 9631, an extender related to Part U1 of Chapter 61 of the Laws of 2023. The chamber then moved to the controversial calendar and debated the first extender, with Senator O’Mara questioning what the bill covered, how much funding it extended, and the status of budget negotiations. Senator Krueger said the extender covered about $1 billion for payroll and certain payments for agencies including Health, Law, OPWDD, and Veterans Services through April 7, and described the budget talks as still unresolved, with no announced follow-up Joint Budget Conference Committee meetings or table targets. She also discussed utility affordability proposals, including a three-year moratorium on A.I. and crypto data/storage facilities and support for green energy and low-income ratepayer relief. O’Mara argued the lack of urgency and absence of written proposals on climate and utility costs was concerning. Both extender bills were then passed, with the first receiving 59 ayes and the second passing 46-13 after debate over its two-year duration. The Senate then adopted the resolution calendar, excluding two items initially, and took up two resolutions. Resolution 1821, sponsored by Senator Ramos, recognized Farmworkers Day and highlighted the essential role of farmworkers, the history of organizing for farmworker rights, and concerns about immigrant workers facing fear and retaliation; Senator May added support, noting the importance of farm labor to dairy production and food supply and the impact of deportation fears on farms in her district. The resolution was adopted. Resolution 1823, sponsored by Senator Zellner, proclaimed March 20, 2026 as Behavior Analysis Day in New York, recognizing applied behavior analysis and its benefits for individuals with developmental disabilities, autism, education, healthcare, and other fields; it was also adopted. The chamber also welcomed a group of students from Queens visiting Albany, with Senator Comrie speaking about the importance of civics education and government engagement. After the introductions and acknowledgments, there was no further business, and the Senate adjourned until Wednesday, April 1, at 11:00 a.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• We've worked very hard over the last excuse me, as outlined in the analysis.
• The County of Alameda is fiscally responsible and sound.
• The committee analysis goes as you know I voice those with you.
• And in the analysis itself, ...was one of those.
• So I'm curious to know, and I did read the analysis, what are we trying to do?

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:24:29.600> is uh intense discussion and analysis is uh intense discussion and analysis
• <01:05:30.160> analysis.
• <01:05:30.799> Again,<01:05:31.119> holding do a fiscal analysis.
• Again, holding do a fiscal analysis.
• analysis is a little over $1. analysis is a little over $1.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, according to my analysis and staff analysis, um, if we look in the legislative reference library,
• there be a fiscal note? there be a fiscal note? Representative<00:15:38.560> Lee.
• definitely um, fiscal note for for that. definitely um, fiscal note for for that.
• > and<00:15:58.600> staff according to my analysis and staff according to my analysis and
• staff analysis,<00:15:59.720> um, analysis, um, analysis, um, if<00:16:00.600> we<00:16

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• There's also real value being lost in the proposal that does not show up in the fiscal analysis.
• require a full independent cost analysis require a full independent cost analysis of<01:47:05.000
• fiscal note on this. fiscal note on this.
• analysis that'll be relating to E HIP alone?”
• <01:58:34.280> analysis actuarial and the fiscal analysis actuarial and the fiscal analysis

Keywords: 1187, senate, all