Video & Transcript Research : 'subsidized'
Page 7 of 105
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Finance Division II (02/09/2026)
Transcript Highlights:
- found this particularly important because some of the money going to education is, in her view, subsidizing
- found this particularly important because some of the money going to education is, in her view, subsidizing
- found this particularly important because some of the money going to education is, in her view, subsidizing
- found this particularly important because some of the money going to education is, in her view, subsidizing
- Representative Murray said that some of the money going to education is, in her view, subsidizing wealthy
Summary:
The Finance Division met to consider two bills: HB 112 and HB 1399. On HB 112, members debated a proposal tied to civics education requirements for public higher education. Supporters argued the measure would reinforce basic civic knowledge and noted that a similar high school requirement had already been enacted with little apparent fiscal impact. Opponents said the legislature should not dictate university curriculum and raised concerns about administrative burden and precedent. The committee voted 5-3 to recommend ought to pass.
The committee then heard testimony on HB 1399, which concerned Claremont and retroactive school building aid related to past construction during the state moratorium on building aid. A Claremont representative explained the district’s history, estimated the lost state aid, and said any funds would likely be used for contingency, tax relief, or future liabilities, while preferring normal building aid participation going forward. Members discussed whether the issue reflected state policy, local governance, or both, and whether the bill would create an unfair retroactive precedent or a broader statewide obligation.
After discussion, the committee voted on an ITL motion for HB 1399. The motion failed, and the committee instead approved the bill 7-1. The chair then closed the hearing and adjourned the meeting.
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
Appropriations and Budget Jan 28th, 2026 at 01:30 pm
Appropriations and Budget
Transcript Highlights:
- So how much a year are we subsidizing care?
- The other question I had was when you were asked about the prevailing rate for non-DHS subsidized daycares
- because they know what the private pay folks are paying in other daycares, and then what they get subsidized
- what we're talking about is keeping lights on the facility, whether or not they're 100% of state subsidized
- From you know, why we participate in this as a state and why we subsidize the care, as you mentioned,
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Science, Technology and Telecommunications Aug 25th, 2025
Science, Technology & Telecommunications Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- With that monopoly, they were able to subsidize service for low-income individuals.
- rates for our critical education institutions; and rural health care, which subsidizes rates for our
- Again, the subsidized monthly broadband service is $30 per household or $75 per household on tribal lands
- If a service provider has a monopoly in a certain area, they're able to subsidize rates because they
- Um, it depends on the service that the household chooses to subsidize.
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
FIN/WAM Joint Info Briefing - Tue Jan 21, 2025 @ 1:00 PM HST
Hawaii House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:28:57.559>
many expenditures we have to subsidize many expenditures we have to subsidize - everybody because in the end subsidizing everybody because in the end subsidizing housing<01:15:
- And again, I don't think we're going to be able to subsidize our way out of this housing crisis.
- We're both at fault, so we got to figure that out. going to be able to subsidize our way going to be
- and we're not relying on not subsidizing and we're not relying on exemptions<01:37:00.760>
has
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Health Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/25
Health Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- 80% of enroling claims only subsidizes 80% of enroling claims between<00:56:49.359>
$50,000 <00 - High medical cost are being subsidized High medical cost for<00:58:42.799>
over <00:58:43.160> 4200 <00:58:44.160>patients <00:58:44.520>were <00:58:44.720>subsidized - for over 4200 patients were subsidized for over 4200 patients were subsidized in<00:58:45.480>
2023 - She says Minnesota families cannot afford to have insurance companies subsidized by their tax dollars
Keywords:
health insurance, premium security plan, federal funding, state innovation waiver, Minnesota, newborn safety, anonymity, healthcare provider, safe place, child welfare, HF499, nursing, nurse licensure, temporary permit, temporary nursing permit, Board of Nursing, endorsement licensure, reregistration, refresher course, health occupations
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
Informational interview with Rep. Steven Jacob (R-Altura) Nov 20th, 2025
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- So, uh, a tax credit is better than, um, just subsidizing things.
- ,<00:03:57.519>
just credit is better than, um, just credit is better than, um, just subsidizing - 58.799>
So, <00:03:59.200>this <00:03:59.360>is <00:03:59.519>saying subsidizing - So, this is saying subsidizing things.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- territory has been removed by the city, or a fiduciary dilemma to use their taxpayer resources to subsidize
- When this was in our ESD, we responded with tankers that carry 3,000 gallons of water to help subsidize
- Taxpayers of ESD number three shouldn't have to subsidize, nor should any ESD have to subsidize the municipalities
Bills:
HB447, HB897, HB993, HB2673, HB3671, HB3680, HB3897, HB4506, HB4753, HB4812, HB4894, HB5148, HB5437, HB5650, HB5652, HB5654, HB5656, HB5661, HB5665
Keywords:
traffic impact studies, municipal utility district, bonds, road projects, eminent domain, HB 897, Texas land sale, state property, Austin real estate, Travis County, General Land Office, Texas State Library and Archives Commission, HHSC, Health and Human Services Commission, state records facility, archives building, library funding, capital improvements, lease of state land, public land disposition
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
- You, through the state general funds, subsidize this to a great degree through state aid to schools.
- Now, that outcome is also not only unfair to taxpayers but also to businesses that aren't subsidized.
- You are subsidizing, so to the extent these properties are not on the tax rolls, you're backfilling to
- Also, don't think that they ought to be subsidizing this local economic development tool...
- In rural areas, there are times we subsidize urban areas, but I believe this is for the greater good.
Keywords:
savings and loan, technical correction, Arizona Revised Statutes, financial institutions, prohibitions, GPLET, abatement, tax incentives, local government, property improvement, central business district, insurance, settlement demands, time limits, third-party claims, regulatory compliance, initiative, referendum, ballot measures, petition circulators
Summary:
The committee first approved the February 2, 2026 minutes and held Senate Bill 1090. It then heard Senate Bill 1503, which would require pension fiduciaries and proxy advisory firms to act solely in the economic interest of plan participants and beneficiaries, prohibit ESG- or ideology-based voting, require disclosures and economic analyses in certain cases, and authorize attorney general enforcement. The sponsor said the bill was meant to protect investors and align with federal action. Testimony was mixed: a policy witness supported the bill, while representatives of ASRS and PSPRS said they were neutral but raised concerns about added costs, operational burdens, reporting requirements, possible conflicts with existing fiduciary duties, and increased litigation risk. After debate, the committee voted 4-3 to give SB 1503 a do-pass recommendation.
The committee then considered Senate Bill 1293, which would prohibit GPLET school-district revenues from being abated during the eight-year abatement period. Supporters argued the bill would protect school funding and reduce state aid backfill costs, and a Goldwater Institute witness said it would also reduce gift-clause concerns by limiting subsidies that shift costs to other taxpayers. City and economic development representatives from Phoenix, Mesa, and the Greater Phoenix Economic Council opposed the bill, saying GPLET is an important redevelopment tool that helps finance projects in urban cores and that the change would reduce its effectiveness and slow revitalization. The committee adopted an amendment and then passed SB 1293 on a 4-3 vote.
Next, the committee heard Senate Bill 1414, which gives insurers 30 days to review and respond to third-party settlement demands in bodily injury claims. Insurance representatives supported the bill as a commercially reasonable timeframe, while the Arizona Trial Lawyers Association opposed it, arguing that 30 days would become a minimum and could delay settlements for injured claimants; members discussed a possible 15-day compromise. The committee passed SB 1414 by a 5-2 vote. It also passed Senate Bill 1633, which creates an income tax subtraction for capital gains from the sale of a primary residence after a five-year residency; opponents warned it would mainly benefit wealthy homeowners and cost the state tens of millions annually, while the sponsor said it could help housing turnover. Finally, the committee passed SB 1429, as amended, allowing Senate and House leaders to designate board members for the Arizona Commerce Authority, SB 1536, which lets municipalities consolidate multiple street-light improvement districts, and heard SB 1724, which clarifies when property splits or consolidations trigger a limited property value recalculation to prevent tax-base manipulation.
TX
Texas 89th 2nd C.S.
Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs May 11th, 2026
Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- The subsidence district as a whole, in the 80s, the Fort Bend Subsidence District was formed primarily
- centered around measuring and trying to reduce subsidence in that area. to reduce subsidence in that
- So we've been subsidized completely by groundwater.
- So how is the subsidence district paid?
- On page 4, did y’all consider the subsidence fee?
Summary:
During the meeting, legislative members discussed the practice of municipalities diverting water and sewer revenues to their general funds, which impacts infrastructure maintenance and project delays. Vice Chair Sparks proposed limiting public testimony to two minutes, which was adopted without objection. The committee heard from various witnesses, including Perry Fowler from the Texas Water Infrastructure Network, who emphasized that utility revenues should primarily support water services and that transfers should be transparent and justified. He noted that many utilities face financial pressures that could hinder infrastructure projects.
Larry French from the Texas Public Policy Foundation highlighted the significant financial impact of water loss and general fund transfers, estimating the annual loss at $1.5 billion. He argued that these transfers can create disincentives for municipalities to address water loss issues. Brian Butcher, Assistant City Manager of Sugar Land, defended the city's cost allocation model for general fund transfers, asserting that they are necessary for equitable service provision and operational efficiency. The committee also discussed the implications of rising construction costs and the need for better procurement processes to ensure effective use of taxpayer dollars.
The second part of the meeting focused on the New World Screwworm and the state's preparedness to manage potential infestations. Dudley Hoskins from the USDA outlined the federal response efforts and the importance of collaboration with state agencies. He emphasized the need for ongoing surveillance and the production of sterile flies to combat the pest. Dr. Philip Kaufman from Texas A&M discussed the historical context of the screwworm and the challenges posed by its potential reintroduction, urging proactive management strategies among livestock producers. The committee acknowledged the need for increased resources and research to effectively address the threat of the screwworm.
CO
Colorado 2026 Regular Session
Colorado House 2026 Legislative Day 118 May 12th, 2026
Colorado House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- It's going to be subsidizing high risk at the cost of low risk, you know, people that have chosen not
- The bill leans on complex financing, enterprise fees, tax credit subsidies, uh, subsidized donations,
- I know you guys aren't stupid, and that subsidizing coverage, including...
- This state continues expanding subsidized health care coverage to individuals who are in this country
- They will now be forced to subsidize the...
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/26/25
Commerce Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- isn't a subsidized program participants pay<01:29:57.719>
the <01:29:57.840>full <01:29 - First and foremost, consumers purchasing insurance in the standard market will be forced to subsidize
- First and foremost, consumers purchasing insurance in the standard market will be forced to subsidize
- policy holders in Minnesota to subsidize policy holders in the<01:42:05.960>
metro <01:42:06.360 - <01:42:46.280>
rates <01:42:46.560>for <01:42:46.760>one simply put subsidized
Keywords:
homeowners insurance, property insurance, commercial property insurance, insurance affordability, insurance market stabilization, reinsurance, catastrophic reinsurance fund, self-insured pool, premium costs, coverage notice, liability reform, climate risk, climate change, housing affordability, multifamily housing, rental housing, common interest communities, cooperatives, small business insurance, Minnesota Commerce Department
ND
North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session
Higher Education Funding Review Committee Jan 14th, 2026 at 08:30 am
Transcript Highlights:
- I think on that too, and you can explain it, we already are subsidizing the smaller institutions in the
- When we talk about the out-of-state, it's very simple: get all you want, but do we want to subsidize
- But do we want to subsidize that credit?
- Plus, on the right side is the subsidized and the unsubsidized portion.
- The subsidized portion, if that instructor is a K-12 teacher who's credentialed with either the right
Summary:
The Higher Education Funding Committee met to discuss possible changes to North Dakota’s higher education funding formula, with a particular focus on separating the UND School of Medicine and Health Sciences MD program from the general formula. Dr. Jenkins outlined several options for the MD program, including a fixed-funding model, a hybrid model, or keeping it in the formula, and emphasized the need to preserve strong support for medical education while making future funding clearer. He also discussed efforts to increase the share of North Dakota students in the MD program through ND85, expanded recruiting, early acceptance pathways, MCAT prep, a four-plus-one program, and the Primary Care Accelerated Track, along with future cost pressures such as AI licensing and residency growth.
The committee then reviewed a simplified funding model from the University System Office that would base funding more heavily on student FTE, credentials awarded, and a few incentive factors such as small institution and research adjustments. Members questioned the use of placeholder numbers, the lack of a clear methodology for the small institution and research factors, and whether the model would adequately account for differences among institutions, high-cost programs, and graduate education. Several members raised concerns that arbitrary factors would be hard to defend politically and could distort funding or create competition between schools, while others said the exercise was useful as a starting point for discussion.
Alex presented a second alternative that kept the current SIP-code structure but increased CTE weighting, added a progressive economic size factor, and separated out the MD program. His model also added an on-campus face-to-face headcount component and a credentials component, with the intent of rewarding in-person enrollment and completions. Members questioned the use of headcount instead of FTE, how hybrid, online, dual-credit, and off-campus students would be treated, and why face-to-face enrollment was weighted more heavily than completion. No formal votes or final actions were taken; the committee instead continued discussion and asked members to provide direction on which elements, if any, should be developed further.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
- the canals have brought water again to 27 million Californians, but they're now suffering severe subsidence
- , and the subsidence is making the water more difficult to transport.
- Subsidence could reduce carrying capacity by 87%.
- The aqueducts that move water through the state have subsided largely due to groundwater pumping that
Summary:
The Senate Committee on Appropriations heard a large suspense-file agenda and established a quorum at the start. SB 1167 was announced as not being heard and will be rescheduled. The Department of Finance did not attend because it had no comments on the bills before the committee. Most measures on the agenda were taken up briefly with public testimony, then moved to suspense without objection.
Two bills received fuller presentations. SB 872 by Senator McNerney would create a fund to support repairs to Delta levees and State Water Project canals, with testimony from Restore the Delta, State Water Contractors, and numerous water agencies and coalitions emphasizing flood protection, water reliability for 27 million Californians, protection of state assets, and long-term infrastructure costs. Committee members noted the importance of the investment and the likelihood it would be considered in the final suspense decision; SB 872 was moved to suspense. SB 962 by Senator Archuleta would authorize CDCR to use blue emergency lights on parole vehicles, with supporters from the California Correctional Peace Officers Association citing the line-of-duty death of a parole agent and the need for a low-cost, discretionary safety tool. The bill was also moved to suspense.
SB 950, dealing with coverage for FDA-approved medically necessary treatments for early-onset Alzheimer’s disease, was discussed as having a minimal near-term fiscal impact, though members noted costs could rise if new treatments emerge. The committee asked the author to consider a sunset amendment, but the bill received a do pass motion and was approved on a 7-0 vote, then placed on call for additional members. The remaining bills taken up, including SB 870, SB 1120, SB 888, SB 904, SB 986, SB 1029, SB 1186, SB 895, SB 1004, SB 1123, SB 909, SB 945, SB 1037, SB 953, SB 1001, SB 1188, SB 1407, SB 967, SB 1135, SB 1136, SB 988, SB 1069, SB 1000, SB 1024, SB 1179, SB 1025, SB 1040, SB 1081, SB 1091, SB 1131, SB 1138, SB 1146, SB 1279, SB 1158, SB 1401, SB 1162, SB 1293, SB 1334, SB 1382, SB 1397, SB 1178, SB 1414, SB 1214, SB 1218, SB 1257, SB 1265, SB 1286, SB 1322, SB 1337, SB 1340, SB 1276, SB 1358, and SB 1412, were moved to the suspense file without objection, with a few witnesses registering support or opposition on selected measures.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, to use their taxpayer resources to subsidize the city services.
- When this was in our ESD, we responded with tankers that carry 3000 gallons of water to help subsidize
- Taxpayers of ESD 3 shouldn't have to subsidize or any ESD shouldn't have to subsidize the municipalities
NM
Transcript Highlights:
- That subsidized service directly to... or any of the funding, just like we do through, say, New Mexico
- That subsidized service directly to, The former federal program, the Affordable Connectivity Program,
- subsidized service directly to broadband providers.
- I mean, we subsidize everything. We pay for everything, and they generate all the income off of it.
- We subsidize this. Another... let me ask you some questions on page 32, line 5, tribal consent.
Keywords:
telecommunications, low-income assistance, lifeline, broadband, rural broadband, universal service fund, public regulation commission, PRC, 911 surcharge, telecommunications relay service, VoIP, mobile service, internet affordability, digital equity, digital inclusion, rural internet, broadband infrastructure, eligible telecommunications carrier, ETC, tribal consent
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- And who are we subsidizing?
- And who are we subsidizing?
- place to properly weigh the major negative impacts of hyperscale data centers, let alone agree to subsidize
- place to properly weigh the major negative impacts of hyperscale data centers, let alone agree to subsidize
- subsidize subsidize them<01:09:58.520>
we <01:09:58.679>agree <01:09:58.920>with
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Bill to expand MN renter's credit heard in House tax committee 3/26/25
Transcript Highlights:
- To subsidize mortgages for those some of those 4% of people who itemize deductions.
- To subsidize mortgages for those some of those 4% of people who itemize deductions.
- <00:26:36.480>
To <00:26:37.360>subsidize <00:26:38.000>mortgages <00:26:38.720>< - To subsidize mortgages for those right?
- To subsidize mortgages for those some<00:26:40.320>
of <00:26:40.559>those <00:26:40.960
Summary:
The committee heard House File 2499, authored by Representative Lee, which would expand Minnesota’s renters’ credit to more closely match the homestead credit for homeowners. Lee explained that the bill would raise the income cutoff from about $75,389 to $143,140 and increase the maximum credit to $3,500, with the goal of addressing what she described as an inequity between renters and homeowners who both pay property taxes. She cited revenue estimates showing the change could make about 80,000 additional renters eligible, while acknowledging the bill would be costly to enact this year.
Nan Madden of the Minnesota Budget Project testified in support, describing how the renters’ credit works, including the assumption that 17% of rent goes toward property taxes. She highlighted 2022 data showing most recipients had low incomes, many were seniors or people with disabilities, and participation was higher in greater Minnesota in some respects. Michael Dah of Homeline also supported the bill, saying renters face rising housing costs and use the credit for basic needs such as groceries, school supplies, medical care, and car repairs.
Members discussed whether expanding the credit would simply benefit landlords or encourage rent increases. Representative Anderson opposed the bill on the grounds that policy should incentivize homeownership, while Representative Huitt argued the credit could help renters build savings and move toward homeownership if they choose. Representative Lee responded that the housing market is broken and that the credit is one tool to help renters in a broader housing continuum. The discussion also covered outreach and administration of the credit, including the recent move to file it with income taxes, electronic certificates of rent paid, and funding for tax-preparation assistance and outreach through VITA sites and community organizations. The bill was laid over for possible inclusion in the omnibus tax bill.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Floor Session Jun 18th, 2026
California Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- So why are the people of California needing to take our tax dollars to subsidize those companies doing
- right for us to ask barbers and farmers and teachers, everyday working people in California, to subsidize
- So why are the people of California needing to take our tax dollars to subsidize those companies doing
- not right for us to ask barbers and farmers and teachers, everyday working people in California to subsidize
- that to that extent. teachers work everyday working people in California to subsidize that to that extent
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- The issue with this is that ESD taxpayer funds are being used to subsidize the lack in service by the
- The issue with this is that ESD taxpayer funds are being used to subsidize the lack in service by the
- a different committee, a similar issue where you had local city services that were really being subsidized
- that service, forcing the ESD into a choice between, okay, do we let our other remaining taxpayers subsidize
- Our other remaining taxpayers subsidize that service, or do we just let the calls drop into the gap?
Bills:
SB208, SB628, SB777, SB1042, SB2354, SB2477, SB2521, SB2523, SB2608, SB2703, SB2778, SB2835, SB2965, SB2367, SB3044
Keywords:
workforce housing, capital investment fund, affordable housing, housing development, Texas housing laws, loan programs, community development, Texas housing, zero-interest loans, low-income housing, nonprofit organizations, construction, economic stability, housing affordability, capital investment, Texas housing policy, county fire code, fire marshal, local government code, interlocal agreement
Summary:
The Senate Committee on Local Government considered and voted on several bills, adopting committee substitutes on Senate Bills 1237, 1708, 1844, 1454, 2520, and 2541. In each case, the committee substitute was explained as narrowing or clarifying the filed bill, and the committee voted to report the substitute version to the full Senate, usually with a recommendation that the filed bill not pass. The committee also recommended each of those measures for the local and uncontested calendar. SB 1237 concerned property tax exemption eligibility for charitable organizations; SB 1844 addressed annexation and disannexation limits tied to city services; SB 1454 clarified housing authority tax exemptions and agreements with districts; SB 2520 dealt with a school district tax ceiling comparison; and SB 2541 reduced the unused increment period from three years to two years.
The committee then heard extensive testimony on SB 2354, which would allow developers to hire qualified third-party professionals for plat review, permit review, and inspections if local governments are delayed. Supporters included affordable housing providers, builders, Pew Charitable Trusts, housing advocates, and legal groups, who said the bill would reduce permitting delays, lower costs, and help housing production. A Corpus Christi representative testified as neutral, asking for amendments to preserve city final inspection authority, document sharing, and floodplain enforcement. Urban counties opposed the bill as written, arguing it removed too much local oversight, though they acknowledged work on a committee substitute. SB 2354 was left pending.
The committee also heard SB 2703, which would clarify that condominiums are not subdivisions for local platting purposes. Builders and a land use attorney supported the bill, saying it would reduce confusion and duplicative regulation; the bill was left pending. SB 777, dealing with firefighter collective bargaining and impasse procedures, drew support from Austin and Texarkana firefighter representatives and the City of Austin, who said the committee substitute reflected stakeholder agreement and preserved voter-approved local procedures; it was left pending. SB 2965, concerning annexation and emergency service district response obligations, drew support from ESD and fire association witnesses who said it would prevent service gaps after annexation, and opposition from local officials who argued it gave unelected ESD boards too much power and lacked neutral review; it was also left pending. The committee then recessed subject to call of the chair.
TX
Texas 89th Regular
S/C on County & Regional Government Mar 17th, 2025
S/C on County & Regional Government
Transcript Highlights:
- So the contract deputy program was created to allow those neighborhoods to pay to help subsidize their
- herself, when was questioned about this, or when was questioning the county auditor, who said, we're subsidizing
- Again, you're supposed to be providing all of our public safety, but say we're subsidizing. them by paying
- in Commissioner's Court they're paying for 70%. percent, they're getting 70 percent, how are we subsidizing
- And so this is just a way to subsidize that if the elected boards from like I said the Mudd districts
Keywords:
law enforcement, sheriff, constable, contracts, county governance, HB 554, fireworks, Juneteenth, Juneteenth holiday, retail fireworks permit, Texas Occupations Code, Local Government Code, county commissioners court, drought conditions, Texas A&M Forest Service, fire safety, holiday sales, seasonal fireworks sales, Fourth of July, Independence Day