Video & Transcript Research : 'protected nonpublic data'
Page 7 of 500
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
Banking, Financial Services and Pensions Feb 10th, 2026 at 03:00 pm
Banking, Financial Services and Pensions
Transcript Highlights:
- And the Oklahoma Realtors association is working on that data.
- This is about protecting Oklahoma homeownership, the American dream.
- can and can't sell to businesses, or you know, the city of Yukon sold land at $85,000 an acre to a data
- Follow up, it's good to hear that you're against the sale of land To data centers, but my question is
- This bill's called the Protections for Financial Exploitation of Protected Adults Act.
Keywords:
credit card transactions, payment methods, service charge, consumer rights, financial regulation, public finance, pension, pension fund, retirement system, board of trustees, proxy voting, proxy proposal, shareholder vote, shareholder activism, fiduciary duty, pecuniary factors, nonpecuniary factors, ESG, environmental social governance, social goals
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Ethics and Elections Jan 14th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- >> YES. >> I WAS LOOKING AT DATA THAT SHOWED -- MR.
- WHAT WE HAVE NOW IS A DATA SET FROM 2022 AND THE DATA SET FROM 2023.
- IT IS NOT AS FAST MOVING AS A DATA SET.
- ANSWER YOUR IMMEDIATE QUESTION, YES WE DO HAVE DATA IN THE DATA SET THAT SHOWS WHAT EACH COMPANY IS
- I WANTED TO KNOW IF THE DATA WAS INCLUSIVE OF THE RATES IN SOUTH FLORIDA. >> THE DATA IS INCLUSIVE OF
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm not looking for exceptions to protecting, but If I've, if I've just kidnapped somebody.
- But if it's a computer breach, because we, we see some things where we've captured your data, you know
- You know, pay us in Bitcoin or whatever to get your You know your data back.
- Hearing nonpublic testimony is closed, and we'll leave the bill. Yes, yes, sir.
Bills:
HB 214
Keywords:
Texas Women's Privacy Act, HB 214, sex-segregated facilities, bathroom bill, restroom access, locker room, changing room, shower room, single-sex spaces, gender identity, transgender, biological sex, women's privacy, public facilities, state agency, political subdivision, correctional facility, prison housing, jail housing, family violence shelter
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Thank protecting non-public pupil aid.
- :02:58.240>
insurance <01:02:58.960>for to protect unemployment insurance for to protect - 2021, the most recent data is from 2023.
- recommendation is more timely data recommendation is more timely data reporting.<01:09:45.600>
- The most recent data is is from 2021. The most recent data is from<01:10:08.400>
2023. - The most recent data is is from 2021. The most recent data is from<01:10:08.400>
Bills:
HF1388
Keywords:
BARR Center, Building Assets, Reducing Risks, education finance, school funding, grant appropriation, evidence-based program, student achievement, social and emotional learning, school climate, teacher effectiveness, high school graduation, students in poverty, students of color, BIPOC, equity in education, Minnesota Department of Education, urban schools, suburban schools, rural schools, school coaching
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Floor Session Sep 8th, 2025
California House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Senate Bill 278 by Senator Cabaldon and others, relating to health data.
- Senate Bill 278 by Senator Cabaldon and others in appellating the health data.
- Senate Bill 278 by Senator Cabaldon and others in appellating the health data.
- SB 373 is about accountability, transparency, and protecting our most vulnerable students.
- SB 593 creates the foundation of data and transparency that California ratepayers deserve.
Summary:
The Assembly convened, established a quorum, offered prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, and then moved through a long floor file with many Senate bills. Early procedural actions included unanimous-consent motions, a successful roll-call to rescind prior action on SB 351, and a 54-vote suspension of Joint Rule 61(a)(3) to allow floor amendments on SBs 80, 351, and 415. The chamber also made several referrals, moved one item to the inactive file, and welcomed new Assembly Member Natasha Johnson and other guests.
The bulk of the meeting consisted of concurrence and third-reading votes on a wide range of measures, many of them passing with little or no opposition. Topics included tribal gaming grants (AB 221), State Bar fee and bar exam changes (SB 253), AI guardrails in community colleges (SB 241), consumer arbitration clauses (SB 82), due process for law enforcement in Racial Justice Act cases (SB 734), dental payment fee disclosures (SB 386), HOA balcony inspection reports (SB 410), farmland protection and EIFD rules (SB 5 and SB 516), emergency shelter zoning (SB 340), HIV confidentiality (SB 504), election signature-cure reforms (SB 3), contractor workers’ compensation compliance (SB 291), fire training funding (SB 345), wage theft enforcement (SB 355 and SB 261), food allergen disclosures (SB 68), ride-share insurance coverage (SB 371), housing and disaster recovery measures (SB 233, SB 625, SB 21), midwifery education (SB 520), mobile home insurance access (SB 525), epinephrine in schools (SB 568), health facility emergency licensing (SB 582), hair relaxer enforcement (SB 236), wastewater surveillance (SB 317), and several tax, transportation, and public health bills.
A number of bills drew brief policy debate or opposition. SB 388, creating a California Latino Commission, prompted criticism from some members who argued the money should go directly to community needs rather than a new commission; it still passed. SB 50 on digital safety for victims of abuse, SB 20 on silicosis prevention, SB 306 on prior authorization reform, SB 373 on oversight of out-of-state special education placements, and SB 437 on reparations descendant-status verification were among the more substantive and discussed measures. Most bills passed by wide margins, often unanimously, and several urgency or tax-levy measures required 54 votes and were approved. The session ended with continued passage of remaining file items and multiple items retained or passed temporarily for later action.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - 01/29/25
Judiciary and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- Data that's not about people gets less protection in our Data Practices Act than data on people.
- less protection in our data Practices less protection in our data Practices Act<01:18:23.840>
- data that should be protected?
- data that should be protected?
- /c><01:55:19.320>
protected Protect data that should be protected.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session 5/13/26 - Part 2
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- nonpublic schools. nonpublic schools.
- court decision that protects court decision that protects reproductive<01:51:47.520>
rights and it should be protected. and it should be protected. - How do we best protect lives? How do we best protect our constituents’ lives?
- than protecting innocent life. than protecting innocent life.
Summary:
The House adopted the conference committee report on House File 1141, the housing bill, and repassed the bill as amended by conference. Representative Howard said the compromise bill would help build thousands of homes, keep Minnesotans housed, and improve transparency and collaboration with the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, while remaining budget-neutral by using MHFA interest earnings and fund transfers. He highlighted investments in housing infrastructure bonds, greater Minnesota workforce housing, manufactured housing, FHPAP, supportive housing, and added transparency for MHFA board meetings, while noting that some Senate provisions such as a manufactured housing bill of rights and a ban on private equity home purchases were not included.
Several members spoke in support, emphasizing housing as a basic need and linking the bill to homelessness, workforce shortages, and health outcomes. Supporters praised the bill’s funding for supportive housing, first-generation homebuyer assistance, tenant hotline services, and manufactured housing, and said the bipartisan conference process improved the measure. Representative Kosowski and others argued the bill would help people stay housed, reduce pressure on schools, hospitals, and emergency rooms, and support communities across all 87 counties and tribal nations.
Republican members raised concerns about spending and government growth, arguing the state should prioritize taxpayer relief, school safety, fraud prevention, and asset preservation instead of housing investments. Representative McDonald questioned the growth in MHFA staffing over the past decade, and Representative Howard responded that the agency had taken on many new responsibilities since the state’s larger housing investments and needed staff to administer programs effectively. After the motion to adopt the conference report prevailed, the bill moved to third reading, where further discussion continued in a generally supportive but divided debate.
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 2/19/25
Public Safety Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Number three, Brady lists, data, spreadsheets, whatever it is, we know that there is data that's out
- Number five, how the private data given under a protective order, which many county attorney's offices
- The fulcrum here, the hot point, is nonpublic data that is required under Brady-Giglio.
- <01:29:38.800>
under nonpublic data that is required under nonpublic data that is required - uh investigation are is not public data uh investigation are is not public data so<01:30:08.960>
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:43:16.319>
this charters already face and protect this charters already face and protect - <01:05:18.799>
this respectfully urge you to protect this respectfully urge you to protect - As you shape the education budget, I urge you to protect this critical funding.
- families and staff and protecting families and staff and protecting equitable<01:10:29.040>
funding - As an review the details of that data.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee May 1st, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- State law is lacking any minimal requirements as it relates to data protection.
- in data breaches, yet the bill lacks basic data minimization protections.
- AB 1221 creates a surveillance and data protection structure for transparency, worker protection, and
- This bill also enacts really important data protections to prohibit employers from sharing worker data
- , and data protections when workplace surveillance tools are being used.
Summary:
The committee heard several bills and took up multiple votes. AB 576, dealing with updates to California’s charitable fundraising platform registry after AB 488, was presented as a technical fix to help charities and platforms more quickly update eligible listings; there was no opposition testimony, and the measure was later moved on a due pass basis. AB 1160, on law enforcement drone programs, was presented with proposed amendments requiring U.S.-based data storage and limits on sharing or selling collected data; supporters said it would protect sensitive drone-collected information while preserving affordable drone use, while there was no opposition testimony, and it was also later passed out on a due pass as amended basis. AB 75, which would require insurers to give notice before collecting aerial images of homes and provide homeowners access to those images, drew support from the Department of Insurance and consumer advocates, while insurers opposed it unless amended, arguing aerial imaging is a cost-saving inspection tool and that the bill could worsen availability and affordability; the bill was moved to Appropriations on a due pass basis, with the roll held open for absent members.
The committee spent the most time on AB 325, which would address algorithmic price-fixing and collusion. The author and supporters argued that competitors using the same pricing software or algorithm to set prices can function as collusion even when the agreement is hidden behind code, and cited examples involving housing, frozen potatoes, gas pricing, and other industries. Opponents, including apartment, business, hospital, retail, chamber, and tech groups, said the bill was too broad, could sweep in lawful software and public-data market research, and might chill legitimate pricing tools, especially for small businesses and housing providers. Committee members raised concerns about clarity, intent standards, and whether the bill should focus more narrowly on nonpublic competitor data; despite those concerns, AB 325 was moved to Appropriations on a due pass basis, with the roll held open.
Later, AB 1221 was presented as a workplace surveillance bill that would prohibit certain invasive or discriminatory surveillance tools, require notice to workers, limit sharing of worker data, and require corroborating evidence before discipline based on surveillance outputs. Labor and consumer groups supported the bill, saying modern surveillance technologies can track speech, movement, emotion, and other sensitive traits and can be biased or abusive. The Security Industry Association opposed it, warning that the bill’s broad definitions could restrict legitimate security systems, emergency sharing with first responders, and employer responses to misconduct or unsafe behavior. The transcript cuts off before any final vote on AB 1221 is shown.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Conference Committee on H.F. 4188 - Omnibus Commerce and Consumer Protection - Part 1 - 05/13/26
Transcript Highlights:
- The H.F. 4188, the Commerce and Consumer Protection Policy Omnibus.
- Chair, Section 13 expands access to and use of the all-payer claims data.
- to and use of the all-payer claims data. to and use of the all-payer claims data.
- Section 5 requires the Commissioner of Commerce to share nonpublic data submitted in an HMO's annual
- when I was first researching my data when I was first researching my data privacy<00:13:38.720><
Summary:
The committee took up H.F. 4188, the Commerce and Consumer Protection Policy Omnibus, and moved through a series of agreed-upon motions to adopt various House and Senate language articles and sections. The adopted provisions covered a wide range of topics, including residential mortgage loan servicing standards, student loan borrower protections, rental home marketplace guarantees, group coverage cancellation, limited lines travel insurance, insurance lead generators, collection agency and credit services organization definitions, proof of identification requirements, scrap metal copper licensing, technical changes to ASTM references and report filings, securities-related provisions, unclaimed property issues involving virtual currency and funeral prepayment funds, repeal of the prescription drug affordability advisory council, reinsurance program changes, and health insurance reporting and oversight provisions. Most motions were adopted without opposition after brief staff explanations and member encouragements to vote yes.
In the health-related sections, the committee adopted language requiring insurers and nonprofit health service plan corporations to notify the Commissioner of Commerce about significant enrollment increases, expanding access to all-payer claims data for oversight, and requiring the sharing of PBM annual transparency reports with the Commissioner of Health. The committee also adopted language on artificial intelligence in utilization review, initially defining AI and prohibiting exclusive reliance on AI for adverse coverage determinations. Representative Elkins then offered an amendment to remove the specific AI definition and replace it with broader language referring to automated processing, arguing that technology-neutral drafting is more durable and that a human must remain in the loop for coverage denials; the amendment was adopted.
After the agreed-upon items were completed, members indicated the chairs would huddle to work on the remaining issues and return after recess. The meeting then recessed to the call of the chair.
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
House of Representatives Second Regular Session of the 60th Legislature Day 2 Feb 3rd, 2026 at 09:30 am
Oklahoma House Floor Meeting
Bills:
HB3725, HB3260, HB3660, HB3369, HB3370, HB2937, HB3419, HB3264, HB3266, HB3267, HB3268, HB3310, HB4311, HB3841, HB3024, HB3075
Keywords:
labor, e-verification, immigration, employers, employment eligibility, Department of Labor, penalties, funeral licensing, continuing education, Oklahoma Funeral Directors Association, professional development, licensing requirements, HB3660, natural organic reduction, human composting, soil reduction, green burial, funeral services, cremation, burial permit
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
House of Representatives Second Regular Session of the 60th Legislature Day 1 Feb 2nd, 2026 at 12:00 pm
Oklahoma House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- We protected religious freedoms.
- And that approach protected Oklahoma so we could make capital improvements without growing headcount.
- This keeps the growth of government in check and it protects the Oklahoma taxpayer.
- We need to come together and protect the vision that was cast in 1907.
- You should be protected by the rights laid out in the Oklahoma Constitution.
Bills:
HB3725, HB3260, HB3660, HB3369, HB3370, HB2937, HB3419, HB3264, HB3266, HB3267, HB3268, HB3310, HB4311, HB3841, HB3024, HB3075
Keywords:
labor, e-verification, immigration, employers, employment eligibility, Department of Labor, penalties, funeral licensing, continuing education, Oklahoma Funeral Directors Association, professional development, licensing requirements, HB3660, natural organic reduction, human composting, soil reduction, green burial, funeral services, cremation, burial permit
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Judiciary (01/22/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- It seems to me that would not be a real restriction, a real limitation, or a real protection against
- The short answer is I really don't know. real protection against those kind of real protection against
- Enterprises trying to scrape data Enterprises trying to scrape data together<01:44:18.360>
in - <03:36:56.800>
And district was going into nonpublic And district was going into nonpublic - up so let's say you've got a nonpublic up so let's say you've got a nonpublic meeting<04:18:50.319
Summary:
The Judiciary Committee opened its hearing with a procedural discussion about a forthcoming Monday hearing, and the chair confirmed that any amendment deemed non-germane would be made public in advance and included in the calendar. The committee then took up House Bill 6, which would replace the word “citizen” in the Right-to-Know law with “any person,” allow requesters to specify the format of records, and expressly reference preliminary drafts circulated to a quorum or majority of a public body as disclosable material. The sponsor said the bill was intended to clarify existing law, remove uncertainty after a Rochester-related dispute over requester eligibility, and make records easier to obtain electronically unless doing so would be impossible, unusual, unduly burdensome, or harmful to recordkeeping integrity.
Testimony was mixed. Cordell Johnston, speaking for himself as a municipal attorney, opposed most of the bill, especially the requirement that records be delivered electronically or by mail, arguing that out-of-state or out-of-country requests can be fishing expeditions that impose significant burdens on towns and clerks. He said local residents already can obtain records at town hall and that many municipalities voluntarily email records as a courtesy, but should not be required to mail large volumes of material. He also said the preliminary-draft language was unnecessary because such drafts are already covered when circulated to a quorum or majority. Representative Alexander raised concerns about the breadth of “any person,” potential abuse by bad actors, and the cost to municipalities, while Representative Peternell asked about whether the bill should account for nonresident property owners and business owners. The sponsor responded that limiting requesters by residency would not meaningfully stop abuse and said he did not know the bill’s fiscal impact, though he suggested it might improve efficiency.
Yil Biset of the ACLU of New Hampshire testified in support of HB 6, calling it a modest and reasonable transparency measure. He said the preliminary-draft language was acceptable and consistent with existing exemption language in the public-meeting and documents statutes, and he said he was not aware of foreign-bot document requests occurring in New Hampshire. He also noted that current law already requires electronic disclosure when records exist electronically and can reasonably be provided that way. No vote or final committee action was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- So, beginning with Section 1, there’s a lot of data practices issues with regard to data privacy issues
- <00:40:41.240>
is uh in our system the effective data is uh in our system the effective data - of someone's data.
- On page three, line five, this data is going to be classified as non-public data, and that means that
- line three .5 through 3.7 uh nonpublic line three .5 through 3.7 uh nonpublic data data data so<
HI
Keywords:
HB1166, automated speed enforcement, speed cameras, traffic enforcement, road safety, traffic safety, Department of Transportation, state highway fund, special fund, appropriation, fiscal year 2026-2027, camera enforcement, speeding citations, automated traffic enforcement, highway safety, HB389, uncrewed aircraft, drone, drones, UAS
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
Senate Election Law and Municipal Affairs (03/18/2026)
Election Law and Municipal Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- So here, public land is protected from loss by adverse use.
- So, I think the bill as written is quite hostile to the protection of private property rights.
- to the protection of private property<00:31:50.640>
rights. - Chair, I'd like to introduce House Bill 1233 relative to the minutes of nonpublic session.
- outlines that you should only be covering in nonpublic session what you've moved to go into nonpublic
NJ
Transcript Highlights:
- It provides protection.
- protections. ...from being hurt by these insurance protections.
- We don't protect institutions, we protect people, this bill... ...angle for this bill.
- Please don't protect the providers. Protect the kids. Thank you. Assemblyman Peterson. Mr.
- Requires electric public utilities to develop and apply special rules for certain data centers to protect
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:22:27.440>
and organization that works to protect and organization that works to protect - consumer protections. consumer protections.
- >
manufactured law for protecting manufactured law for protecting manufactured homeowners<02:29 - restrictions or some better protections restrictions or some better protections for<02:39:06.800
- some data on like some data on um<05:59:39.360>
how <05:59:39.600>your <05:59:39.840>
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - 03/09/26
Judiciary and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- training data. training data.
- safeguards for private data on individuals and ensure that nonpublic data is only accessible to persons
- The improper release of nonpublic data can lead to civil liability for government entities under section
- Now, if nonpublic data is entered into many web-based generative AI applications, that data leaves the
- On page seven, you'll of protected data.