Video & Transcript Research : 'meat processing'

Page 7 of 500
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

AGR Public Hearing - Wed Mar 18, 2026 @ 9:30 AM HST

Agriculture & Food Systems

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's just a process we go through.
  • So there is same process.
  • I think it's also worth meat.
  • <01:02:39.280> processing<01:02:39.760> facilities kitchens or meat processing facilities
  • kitchens or meat processing facilities that<01:02:40.400> are<01:02:40.559> accessible
Summary: The committee heard testimony on SB 2885 SD1, which would create mandatory handling and storage rules for commercial and residential coconut rhinoceros beetle host material beginning in 2027, with penalties and an effective date. Support came from the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity, DLNR, Maui County Department of Agriculture, the Hawaii Farm Bureau, Hawaii Farmers Union, and the Office of Hawaiian Affairs. Testifiers generally said the bill would help reduce CRB spread, though some urged additional science-backed methods, better coordination, and technical or cost-share support for smaller operations. Hawaiian Earth Recycling recommended amendments to align the bill with existing Department of Health/EPA composting rules, add other materials that can harbor CRB, allow future approved treatment methods, and replace the bill’s 60-day turning requirement with existing pathogen-reduction standards. One individual supported the goal but argued the state’s CRB strategy has lacked community and cultural consultation and should include a cultural advisement role. Department witnesses said enforcement would rely on inspection and an educate-before-regulate approach, and they noted the challenge of creating enough drop-off sites, especially in rural areas. The committee then took up SB 2174 SD2, which would authorize the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity to declare an emergency quarantine, halt operations in affected areas for 96 hours with possible extension, quarantine suspected pest areas, issue notices and compensation to affected farmers, and adopt interim transportation rules for materials that may harbor high-impact invasive species. The department and DLNR supported the measure, emphasizing the need for fast action in the first hours of an invasion. Hawaii Farmers Union supported the compensation provisions but asked for stronger communication with producers and a post-action report to the Board of Agriculture after about 90 days to evaluate effectiveness and economic impacts. In response to questions, department staff said the bill would be a short-term, department-only quarantine authority distinct from the governor-declared biosecurity emergency authority enacted previously, and that it could serve as an intermediate step. They also said outreach would need to be done through farm organizations such as Farmers Union, Farm Bureau, and Cattlemen’s groups. The final measure discussed was SB 2925 SD1, relating to coconut trees. The bill would recognize coconut trees as a source of food and water and a cultural treasure, require rules for coconut tree seed banks, require signage identifying landscape palms where applicable, set labeling standards for non-consumable landscape palms, and create an income tax credit for consumable coconut trees maintained through natural management practices. The transcript ended before testimony or action on this bill was completed, and no vote was taken on any of the measures discussed in the portion provided.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Feb 12, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • Sorry, I was muted. current uh slow fragmented process is current uh slow fragmented process is really
  • Um, in terms of Kahana Bay process.
  • a process basically. a process basically.
  • <00:51:40.640> Our Erosion is a natural process. Our Erosion is a natural process.
  • So we have a shoreline processes.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1846, relating to shoreline mitigation districts. DLNR and the Office of Planning opposed the bill, arguing it would improperly shift regulatory roles between the agencies and prioritize private land interests over public trust and natural and historic resources. Supporters, including the Shoreline Preservation Coalition, Kahana Bay residents, and Hawaii Realtors, said regional planning is needed to address severe erosion, especially in Kahana, and that better coordination between state and county agencies could help move stalled projects forward. Testifiers emphasized that shoreline conditions vary by area and that science-based, region-specific solutions are needed. Members asked questions about whether existing law already allows regional planning and emergency shoreline responses. DLNR said it already has authority to process regional projects and cited an existing draft EIS for Kahana Bay that would proceed through normal permitting and public hearing channels. Supporters responded that the bill would provide a clearer regional planning framework and help communities facing urgent erosion impacts. No vote was taken on HB 1846 in the portion provided. The committee then took up HB 2205, relating to emergency erosion mitigation. DLNR opposed the bill, saying it already has authority to issue emergency permits and had recently done so quickly for a collapsed sidewalk at Queen Surf Beach, and warning that the bill’s language could weaken Act 16 by changing a prohibition on shoreline hardening to a requirement to merely minimize it. Kahana Bay representatives and other supporters argued the bill would create a limited, regulated short-term pathway for emergency shoreline solutions while long-term plans are developed, and said current permits have expired or stalled, leaving dangerous sandbags and no practical relief. Additional testimony from a private homeowner stressed that erosion is threatening homes and that private owners are often bearing the cost of protecting public shoreline access. The discussion remained focused on balancing emergency protection, public access, and long-term shoreline management, and no final action was taken in the excerpt provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Apr 14th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • During the interview process, I started asking them, was this school an in-person school?
  • To help address that concern in the process as well.
  • So there's a—Is the vetting process with the medical school?
  • There are processes as nurses, advanced practice nurses, and CRNAs.
  • We are vetted through similar processes.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Apr 14th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • That process already just makes things worse. I did want to point out... Briefly.
  • It doesn't restrict access to care; it protects individuals in the recovery process.
  • Not everything worked, and we had to go through this process of trial and error.
  • So it's really a regulatory process to issue.
  • We support this process. We have been negotiating with other parties and...
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Human Committee Meeting - 2025-04-03

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • It establishes a review process upon notice of agency denial, reduction, suspension, or termination of
  • I just want to say it's been a joy to be part of this process. I think I can speak.
  • And we're here to try to streamline the process and reduce bureaucracy.
  • People utilizing waivers have already gone through an extensive assessment and approval process.
  • So I think we need a little bit of background information on how that process worked.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 4/3/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So they want be a part of the process.
  • And we're here to manage the process.
  • Individuals utilizing processing times.
  • They shouldn't be forced to process.
  • process worked. process worked.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband and Rural Development - 01/22/25

Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • processing, meat cutting, butchery.
  • processing, meat cutting, butchery.
  • processing, meat cutting, butchery.
  • processing, meat cutting, butchery.
  • processing, meat cutting, butchery.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • , meat, meat, >> right?
  • whole uh processing at a federal level. whole uh processing at a federal level.
  • processing at risk.
  • processing at risk.
  • processing and reselling freezer<00:55:49.760> burned<00:55:50.079> meat,<00:55:50.960
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee held a work session on House Bill 396, which would exempt meat and meat food products slaughtered and prepared in-state for in-state sale from certain inspections. Representative Comtois explained her amendment, saying she tried to address prior concerns by limiting the number processed monthly, adding a registration and disclaimer requirement, and folding beef, swine, sheep, and goats into the bill’s framework. Members discussed whether some sections from earlier language on bison, elk, and red deer had been inadvertently struck, and Comtois said she did not intend to remove those protections and would restore them if needed. Several members raised drafting and policy concerns. Representative Miner suggested the waiver language should be a signed, notarized statement kept on file rather than filed with the Department of Agriculture, and Comtois agreed. Representative Gruber and Representative Scully discussed labeling and wording, including clarifying that the meat would not be “exempt” from federal inspection in the same way as non-amenable species, and adding language that any prosecution would be federal rather than state. There was also discussion about whether ground meat should be included for the amenable species, with Miner and Comtois indicating that excluding ground meat would reduce risk. Commissioner Sean Jasper of the Department of Agriculture, Markets, and Food testified strongly against the bill, saying it was a step in the wrong direction, lacked consumer protections, and could jeopardize food safety and the state’s meat processing system. He argued that the federal exemption for non-amenable species could not simply be extended to new species by state law, warned that USDA could respond by withdrawing federal inspections, and said the bill would not solve the real bottlenecks in slaughter capacity. He also said he did not believe there was a general shortage of inspectors, and that the practical issue was producers not scheduling animals year-round, which forces facilities to scale to the slow season. No vote was taken during the work session, and members continued discussing possible amendments and wording changes.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • raw meat or raw chicken, which are not necessarily processed.
  • I'm new to this whole issue of meat I'm new to this whole issue of meat processing<01:51:13.719>
  • meat that has been slaughtered with a USDA inspection and then process it further in your operation
  • or, you know, the dehydrated meat process and so forth, I took that totally from the USDA website, which
  • process the meat into jerky.
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee first held a work session on HB 505, which would allow the sale of freeze-dried foods produced in homestead food operations. Members raised concerns about the bill’s broad language, especially the provision stating freeze-dried food would not be considered potentially hazardous. Several suggested narrowing the bill to specific products such as processed foods, berries, fruit, dairy products, ice cream, or vegetables, and requiring use of commercial freeze-drying equipment rather than dehydrators. There was also discussion of oxygen absorbers, moisture control, sanitation, and whether the issue should be handled in statute or rules. By the end of the discussion, members generally agreed the topic should be treated in a separate section of law rather than folded into the existing homestead food license, and the chair said the matter would be sent to the food safety subcommittee, with the possibility of a study committee if more time was needed. The committee then moved to HB 277, a technical correction to the animal cruelty statutes. Representative Bixby explained that current law refers to a “colt,” which applies only to male baby horses, leaving fillies unaddressed; the bill would replace “colt” with “foal” and make related wording changes so the restriction applies to any horse under 90 days old not being nursed by its dam. The New Hampshire Farm Bureau testified in support, saying the change was requested to clarify and modernize the statute and that the issue had been identified during work on related animal cruelty legislation. No votes were taken in the portion provided. The chair recessed the work session until 11:00 a.m. and announced that Representative Ktoa would take over the hearing on HB 277.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Higher Education Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Committee on Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • It does not prohibit the serving or the eating of meat.
  • and meat as a carcinogen.
  • And so the meat industry is a major, As a carcinogen.
  • meats and deli meats are considered Level 1 carcinogens?
  • I believe that moving away from excessive amounts of processed meats, dairy, and eggs is a great way
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The Joint Committee on Higher Education held its first hearing and heard testimony on a wide range of bills, including hunger-free campuses, FAFSA completion, early college/college-in-high-school programs, banning legacy preferences, AP credit consistency, and tuition equity for the Stockbridge School of Agriculture. Committee leaders opened by outlining the hearing process and noting the three-minute testimony limit. Legislators and advocates generally framed the bills as equity and access measures aimed at improving college affordability, student success, and workforce development. Representative Vargas testified for H. 1466 and H. 1467, arguing that hunger-free campus should be codified because many public college and community college students face food insecurity, and that FAFSA completion should be improved through individualized outreach and an opt-out or completion requirement. Senator Lovely, the Greater Boston Food Bank, and other advocates supported the hunger-free campus bill, citing data that 44% of public university and community college students experienced food insecurity in 2023 and that food insecurity harms graduation rates. Femi Stoltz and Shanti Lopez Toro backed the FAFSA bill, saying many students miss out on Pell grants and need direct support; they pointed to state examples such as Louisiana and to recent state action requiring FAFSA awareness. Committee members asked about the federal FAFSA rollout, regional equity in food access, and the need for long-term funding and data collection. A large panel supported H. 1455 on college and high school/early college, including former Chair Roy, the Massachusetts Alliance for Early College, a student graduate, MBAE, and Tripp Jones. They described early college as a proven model that helps low-income and first-generation students, improves degree attainment, and supports workforce needs; witnesses said the goal is to scale from about 9,000 students and 55 partnerships toward 22,000 to 25,000 students by 2030, with possible future growth beyond that. Members raised questions about funding, public-private partnerships, parental involvement, faculty development, and whether the bill should include data review and more standardized policies across institutions. Representative Garcia also testified for H. 1432 on AP credit, saying students should receive consistent credit for AP scores of 3, 4, or 5. Senator Edwards and James Murphy testified for the legacy preference ban, arguing it is unfair and rooted in exclusionary history; they said some states have already banned legacy preferences in public and private institutions. Finally, UMass Dean Michael Fox, alumnus Dan Mayer, and student Jake Rasmussen supported S. 920 to include Stockbridge associate degree programs in MassEducate, saying tuition equity would help enrollment and support Massachusetts agriculture and green-industry jobs.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Joint Appropriations Committee, January 5, 2026 - PM

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, we have to be the Federal Meat Inspection Act. Yeah, the Federal Meat Inspection Act.
  • Dairy resides there and other meat.
  • >> What percentage of of it is meat >> What percentage of of it is meat inspection?
  • that is not that's not an easy process that is not that's not an easy process for<00:41:08.880><
  • Finally, if I might add one process.
Keywords: 916, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Labor - 04/14/26

Labor

Transcript Highlights:
  • And in the run-up to our approval and passage of the Safe Workplaces for Meat and Poultry Processing
  • The report also notes that there are approximately 91 meat packing and poultry processing facilities
  • meat and poultry processing that limits meat and poultry processing line<01:02:35.560> speeds.
  • and poultry processing small meat and poultry processing locations.<01:03:31.800> The<01:03:31.880
  • Safe Workplaces for Meat and Poultry Processing<01:04:01.600> Workers<01:04:01.960> Act.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MS

Mississippi 2026 Regular Session

Agriculture - Room 210, 3 February, 2026; 2:00 P.M.

Agriculture

Transcript Highlights:
  • You can buy them for head, but when if you buy something meat, then if I sell you meat, then that's a
  • It's just ... through to get the meat, but just change through to get the meat, but just change the<00
  • ,<00:04:13.680> then<00:04:13.840> then meat, then if I sell you meat, then then meat
  • And this is the meat labeling law.
  • And this is the meat labeling law.
Summary: The committee first discussed a bill codifying herd-share/custom slaughter practices for small livestock producers. The sponsor proposed amending the bill to change “sale and/or purchase” to “deposit” and to allow pricing by live weight, dressed weight, or final weight. Members raised concerns that allowing payment by dressed weight could trigger federal USDA inspection requirements and conflict with existing federal rules. After discussion, the committee agreed to keep only the first change, striking “purchase” and inserting “deposit,” and to leave the weight-pricing language unchanged. The sponsor then withdrew the broader amendment, and the bill was reported out with a title-sufficient do-pass motion. The committee next took up a bill authorizing Mississippi State University Extension to assist poultry farmers with management plans, citing delays caused by short staffing at NRCS and DEQ. Members asked whether the extension service was comfortable with the role and were told the assistance would be voluntary and not mandatory. The bill was reported out on a title-sufficient do-pass motion. The committee also approved a bill to allow crawfish farms to be licensed, and a bill on district livestock shows that would let the northeast district show be held at any facility within the county rather than only at the Verona livestock center, which the sponsor said was no longer suitable for the children involved. The committee then considered a meat-labeling bill making technical amendments to last year’s law on cultured meat and related products. After an initial vote was set aside because of a communications problem, the committee reconsidered the bill and adopted an amendment changing a funding reference from “special” to “general fund.” The bill was then reported out as amended. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 2631, creating a voluntary Mississippi Grain Indemnity Act to protect grain producers if elevators or buyers fail financially. The sponsor said the program would be funded by a per-bushel assessment, capped at $25 million, with possible state seed money still under discussion. Members asked about the source of any additional funds and the history of recent grain failures, and the bill was then moved forward on a title-sufficient do-pass motion.
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • facilities that meet state law requirements under the federal or state meat inspection programs.
  • They would cross-train with us so they could do the meat and poultry inspection, as well as the food
  • They would cross-train with us so they could do the meat and poultry inspection, as well as the food
  • This session I’m carrying a mobile meat packing bill that would allow mobile meat processing.
  • So we will do that all through the regulatory process.
Keywords: 909, all
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Committee on Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband and Rural Development - 03/21/25

Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • That's the same story for processing.
  • a little bit more about that process? a little bit more about that process?
  • Thank you for your time and consideration. ban cell cultured meat or lab grown ban cell cultured meat
  • Steers and sell meat direct to consumer. Steers and sell meat direct to consumer.
  • of cell cultured meat progressing? of cell cultured meat progressing?
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Water and Natural Resources Nov 18th, 2025

Water & Natural Resources Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • Again, expanding in-state meat processing is key to meeting 50% local demand. Next slide.
  • Accounting for all local meat market segment demands, we do not process enough beef.
  • Madrid will be speaking a little bit more in depth on meat processing in the state and specifically the
  • Upgrades in infrastructure and equipment through the New Mexico Local Meat Processing Grant.
  • In our ready-to-eat kitchen, we process fully cooked meat products using New Mexico-grown beef.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

House - Agriculture, Acequias And Water Resources Feb 4th, 2025

House Agriculture, Acequias And Water Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • They need a place to go with the byproduct that happens whenever you process a beef.
  • Justin Romero owns Matthews Meats, and Melissa Dominguez works at Matthews Meats, so they're my expert
  • So they're talking to their students about meat processing.
  • Too much of our meat.
  • Too much of our meat is leaving our state, and we're paying to bring it back in.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Economic and Rural Development Sep 4th, 2025

Economic & Rural Development & Policy Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm pleased to be here today to talk about meat processing in the state. Let's see here.
  • Obviously, we're focused on expanding state meat processing.
  • The focus of that grant was to address the challenges of meat processing.
  • For those meat processing facilities that maybe can't...
  • Having this meat processing in our state has really changed that.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband and Rural Development - 04/15/26

Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:19:35.960> processing<00:19:36.679> workforce for meat processing workforce for
  • meat processing workforce development.<00:19:38.919> In<00:19:39.080> that<00:19:39.440
  • This is a really important part of our work to address the shortage of meat processing in our state and
  • <00:20:33.080> processing address the shortage of meat processing address the shortage of
  • meat processing in<00:20:33.920> our<00:20:34.040> state<00:20:34.880> and<00:20
Keywords: 1187, senate, all