Video & Transcript Research : 'ethics'

Page 7 of 161
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill requires the Texas Ethics Commission to redact an individual's residential home address on a
  • non-residential address, as defined in the statute, will still have their addresses publicly posted on a Texas Ethics
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Mar 12th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And some, you know, we have, you know, of course, medical ethics, we have required.
  • Members, Senate Bill 869 and is a bill to provide greater clarity and direction to the Ethics Commission
  • The bill also specifies that the Texas Ethics Commission only has tolling capabilities in the event that
  • Relaying the deadline for the Texas Ethics Commission to resolve certain complaints you recognize final
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • legal professionals, and it's very clear that the bar is woefully inadequate at reinforcing sound ethical
  • If the professional has deviated from ethics or standards prescribed by the professionals, like, ...or
  • action when a court-appointed evaluator, therapist, or other professional deviates from required ethics
  • Like so many families... appointed professionals accountable when they violate the ethical standards
  • A qualified ethical professional advising the court would not object to this bill.
Summary: The committee approved the minutes and then took up several election, family court, and criminal justice bills. SB 1425, the “big bill,” would move Arizona’s 2026 primary election date earlier and adjust related election administration timelines; the chair’s amendment moved the primary to July 21 and removed the shortened curing/ID deadlines. County officials testified in support, explaining the timing changes and the need to align dates, and the committee adopted the amendment and gave the bill a do-pass recommendation. SB 1289, dealing with certifications for entities providing money or resources for election administration and foreign funding disclosures, also received a do-pass recommendation after testimony from supporters arguing it would block foreign influence in election administration and ballot issue spending. The committee later heard SCR 1013, a related resolution that would more directly prohibit foreign-source money for election administration and ballot measures; the sponsor and supporters said it was similar to SB 1289 but broader, and testimony focused on foreign money flowing through nonprofit networks. The committee then considered SB 1326, which would allow courts to award attorney fees and costs to victims when a party violates or worsens a victim’s rights. A victim’s attorney testified that the bill would provide needed accountability and guidance, while opponents argued the term “exacerbates” was vague and that existing remedies already exist. The committee approved SB 1326 on a 4-3 vote. SB 1402, requiring courts to impose a fee on certain probationers to cover electronic monitoring costs, drew support from the sponsor and advocates who said offenders should pay for monitoring, and opposition from defense attorneys who warned it could burden indigent probationers and divert money from treatment; it also received a 4-3 do-pass recommendation. The most extensive debate was on SB 1330, which would allow a parent in certain custody cases to request a jury trial on parenting time or legal decision-making. Supporters, including several parents, described costly and traumatic family court experiences and argued a jury would provide a neutral check on judges and court-appointed professionals. County and court representatives opposed the bill, saying family cases require specialized judicial expertise, jury trials would delay urgent matters, increase costs, and risk confidentiality. Despite those concerns, the committee adopted the bill on a 4-3 vote. The committee also approved SB 1328, which declares state policy favoring parental rights and a child’s equal access to both co-parents, after adopting an amendment adding legislative intent language. Finally, SB 1329, which would let parents sue court-appointed professionals who deviate from professional ethics or standards in custody matters, passed 4-3 after testimony from parents and advocates who said court appointees lack accountability, while opponents said existing malpractice and licensing remedies already address misconduct.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • For the council's ethics and operation, it allows the Texas Treasury Safekeeping Trust Company to reallocate
  • In summary, this bill makes several changes to clarify and strengthen the ethics and administration of