Video & Transcript Research : 'development fees'

Page 7 of 500
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Jan 21st, 2026

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • We also have an increase in taxes and fees to support the state road fund.
  • We um develop these lists at the district level initially.
  • There's no additional fee today. You got to tell her what the question is.
  • We share with them the vehicle registration fees. They have the ability to do this.
  • We look at quantum and look at that economic development packaging.
Bills: SB2
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/12/25

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • model language, and there's a fee for us to be involved in that here in the state of Minnesota.
  • The fees are enormous.
  • <01:14:12.480> legal plaintiff's attorneys develop legal plaintiff's attorneys develop legal
  • So the fees that you pay on a monthly basis will vary greatly between associations.
  • Second is the costs that are built into an HOA as a monthly association fee assessment.
Bills: HF1865, HF2014, HF2028
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Boards, Agencies and Commissions Committee Feb 18th, 2025

Boards, Agencies and Commissions

Transcript Highlights:
  • It authorizes the board to impose late fees and revises the board's authority to...
  • We talk about disciplinary civil penalties, late fees, and non-disciplinary administrative fines.
  • The next paragraph talks about the board adopting a civil penalty and an administrative fee schedule
  • Therefore, we had to hit hard on the definition of fines, fees, and penalties.
  • I paid the fee and went on; there was no consequence to me.
Bills: HB123
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Under Senate Bill 2354, a developer would have the option, not the requirement, to hire a third party
  • to review applications for plats, plans, or development permits and conduct building inspections.
  • , it reduces delays and promotes efficiency in property development.
  • With this being permissive for the developer, the developer can still choose to go directly through the
  • We still pay the city their full fees. fee for a permit and for inspection, although the third party
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part I) Apr 24th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • This ambiguity has resulted in administrative inefficiencies, duplicate fees for developers, and jurisdictional
  • fees, as we know about these permitting fees in this committee, utility connections, road development
  • building homes, let alone developing the development to build the homes.
  • Lastly, expenses would include land acquisition, planning and design costs, impact fees, permitting fees
  • Plain and simple, housing development is economic development in its most sustainable form.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Local Government met with a quorum and limited public testimony to two minutes per person. The committee heard Senate Bill 628 by Senator Zaffirini, which would clarify that counties may enter interlocal agreements with emergency service districts to administer and enforce county fire codes, including for multi-county ESDs in the committee substitute. Witnesses from Travis County ESD-11, the Travis County Fire Marshal’s Office, and a member of the public supported the bill as a way to reduce duplication, costs, and jurisdictional confusion. Public testimony was closed and the committee substitute was left pending. The committee then heard several housing-related bills. Senate Bill 208 by Senator West would create a Workforce Housing Capital Investment Fund to provide zero-interest loans to nonprofit builders for workforce housing; Habitat for Humanity representatives, a Brownsville nonprofit developer, and housing advocates supported it as a way to finance infrastructure and land development for affordable homes. Senate Bill 2835 by Senator Johnson would allow cities to opt into single-stair apartment buildings for small-scale, multi-story housing; supporters said the design is safe and could expand housing supply, while the Texas APA expressed qualified opposition over code-process concerns and fire-safety questions. Both bills were left pending after testimony. Additional bills heard included SB 1042 updating the Kimble County Hospital District’s enabling law; SB 1708, a committee substitute protecting familial property divisions from platting requirements; SB 2778 raising the ESD expenditure threshold requiring board approval from $2,000 to up to $50,000; SB 2608 expanding LIHTC eligibility for certain public housing projects; SB 3044 adding board representation for Marfa and Presidio on the Presidio County Underground Water Conservation District and adjusting an exemption; SB 2367 extending park board authority to Waller County; SB 2523 clarifying ETJ reduction procedures and owner opt-out rights; SB 2521 requiring death-certificate reporting to appraisal districts to help address squatting and homestead exemption issues; and SB 2477 easing office-to-residential conversions in larger cities. In each case, the bills were laid out, testimony was taken, and the measures were left pending subject to call of the chair. The committee then recessed until 15 to 30 minutes after adjournment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part II) Apr 24th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • It reduces delays and promotes efficiency in property development.
  • With this being permissive for the developer, the developer can still choose to go directly through the
  • , and in El Paso with over 70 builders and developers.
  • My director of development services, in fact.
  • And would certainly be considered a pro-development city.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Local Government considered and voted on several bills, adopting committee substitutes on Senate Bills 1237, 1708, 1844, 1454, 2520, and 2541. In each case, the committee substitute was explained as narrowing or clarifying the filed bill, and the committee voted to report the substitute version to the full Senate, usually with a recommendation that the filed bill not pass. The committee also recommended each of those measures for the local and uncontested calendar. SB 1237 concerned property tax exemption eligibility for charitable organizations; SB 1844 addressed annexation and disannexation limits tied to city services; SB 1454 clarified housing authority tax exemptions and agreements with districts; SB 2520 dealt with a school district tax ceiling comparison; and SB 2541 reduced the unused increment period from three years to two years. The committee then heard extensive testimony on SB 2354, which would allow developers to hire qualified third-party professionals for plat review, permit review, and inspections if local governments are delayed. Supporters included affordable housing providers, builders, Pew Charitable Trusts, housing advocates, and legal groups, who said the bill would reduce permitting delays, lower costs, and help housing production. A Corpus Christi representative testified as neutral, asking for amendments to preserve city final inspection authority, document sharing, and floodplain enforcement. Urban counties opposed the bill as written, arguing it removed too much local oversight, though they acknowledged work on a committee substitute. SB 2354 was left pending. The committee also heard SB 2703, which would clarify that condominiums are not subdivisions for local platting purposes. Builders and a land use attorney supported the bill, saying it would reduce confusion and duplicative regulation; the bill was left pending. SB 777, dealing with firefighter collective bargaining and impasse procedures, drew support from Austin and Texarkana firefighter representatives and the City of Austin, who said the committee substitute reflected stakeholder agreement and preserved voter-approved local procedures; it was left pending. SB 2965, concerning annexation and emergency service district response obligations, drew support from ESD and fire association witnesses who said it would prevent service gaps after annexation, and opposition from local officials who argued it gave unelected ESD boards too much power and lacked neutral review; it was also left pending. The committee then recessed subject to call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Local Government (Part I) Apr 24th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • This ambiguity has resulted in administrative inefficiencies, duplicate fees for developers, and jurisdictional
  • fees, as we know about these permitting fees in this committee, utility connections, road development
  • building homes, let alone developing the development to build the homes.
  • Lastly, expenses would include land acquisition, planning and design costs, impact fees, permitting fees
  • Plain and simple, housing development is economic development in its most sustainable form.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Local Government met with a quorum at the start, adopted a two-minute limit for public testimony, and heard a series of housing, local government, fire code, and district-governance bills. Several measures were laid out with committee substitutes, including SB 628 on county fire code administration through interlocal agreements with emergency service districts; SB 208 creating a Workforce Housing Capital Investment Fund for zero-interest loans to nonprofit builders; SB 2835 allowing cities to opt into single-stair apartment buildings; and SB 2477 easing office-to-residential conversions in certain cities. Other bills addressed ESD spending thresholds (SB 2778), hospital district updates (SB 1042), subdivision/platting issues (SB 1708), public housing tax credit eligibility (SB 2608), groundwater district representation for Marfa and Presidio (SB 3044), park board authority in Waller County (SB 2367), ETJ removal procedures (SB 2523), and reporting death certificates to appraisal districts to help address squatting and homestead issues (SB 2521). Testimony was largely supportive on the housing bills. Supporters of SB 208, including Habitat for Humanity affiliates, a Brownsville nonprofit developer, Texans for Housing, and an educator, said the revolving fund would help nonprofit builders finance land, infrastructure, and development costs for affordable homes, especially for families earning 30% to 80% of area median income. SB 2835 drew support from architects, planners, and housing advocates who argued that single-stair buildings can be safe, more efficient, and better suited to missing-middle housing, though the Texas APA registered qualified opposition, saying the proposal bypasses the usual code-development process and may not be sufficiently studied. SB 2477 also received broad support from housing groups and policy organizations, who said office conversions could help address vacancy and housing shortages, though Corpus Christi raised a concern about fee recovery and local cost reimbursement. The committee also heard support for SB 628 from a county fire marshal and an ESD representative, who said the bill would reduce duplicate fire-code enforcement and costs. SB 2778 was backed by a Bexar County ESD fire chief, who said the current $2,000 expenditure approval threshold is outdated and slows emergency purchases and repairs. SB 2608 was supported by the El Paso housing authority, which said adding certain Section 8 projects to the at-risk LIHTC set-aside would help renovate aging subsidized housing. SB 3044 was presented as a way to give Marfa and Presidio representation on the groundwater district board while preserving permitting authority. Each bill heard public testimony was left pending subject to the call of the chair, and the committee recessed to reconvene after the Senate adjourns.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Civil Law and Procedure May 26th, 2026

Civil Law and Procedure

Transcript Highlights:
  • resolution that's before you this morning is an anticipatory instrument based upon the current economic development
  • projects in New Orleans East, my district 100, as well as some anticipated economic development projects
  • bulk cargo, with thousands of acres of land in New Orleans East that are owned privately but not developed
  • control of local municipalities in New Orleans so that we can figure out a way to put those back in development
Bills: HR307, SB228
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part II) May 15th, 2025

Local Government

Summary: The Senate Committee on Local Government met with a quorum and took up a series of pending bills, mostly local-government measures. Early action included final committee approval of Senate Bill 1633 and S.J.R. 60, followed by Senate Bill 3038 and Senate Bill 3045, both reported favorably and placed on the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also considered House Bill 24, adopted a committee substitute, and reported the substitute version favorably; House Bill 2025 was likewise reported favorably and sent to the local and uncontested calendar. Members then handled several companion and local bills, including House Bill 2713 as the companion to Senate Bill 1331, which was reported favorably and placed on the local and uncontested calendar. House Bill 3348, House Bill 3370, House Bill 3505, and House Bill 4506 were each reported favorably, with no objections to local-and-uncontested placement. House Bill 5424 passed on a 6-1 vote, and House Bill 5652 passed with one present-not-voting, both also sent to the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also adopted substitutes and reported House Bill 3687 and House Bill 4205, though both were later reconsidered because the wrong script had been read. After reconsideration, House Bill 3687 and House Bill 4205 were each re-voted and reported favorably to the full Senate, with both placed on the local and uncontested calendar. Senate Bill 3071 was also reported out on a 5-2 vote after adoption of a committee substitute. The meeting ended with no further business and the committee standing at recess subject to the call of the chair.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, since 2009, when the fee structure for the Construction Industries Board, the fee structures
  • Construction Industries Board has presented a fair and responsible assessment that we adjust their fee
  • be a barrier for people to be able to even get into the trades due to the large increase of these fees
  • I don't believe I would say that, thinking through the fee structure that they've asked for.
  • That they didn't ask for any fees that I would consider absorbitant.
Bills: SB1239, SB1732
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Jan 21st, 2026 at 02:04 pm

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • We also have an increase in taxes and fees to support the state. Road Fund.
  • The surcharge is additional to the registration fees. Thank you for your time, Madam.
  • How are we stacking up now with our neighboring states in terms of fees?
  • We developed these lists at the district level.
  • They have the bill we give them; we share with them the vehicle registration fees.
Bills: SB2
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Appropriations and Finance Jan 21st, 2026 at 01:58 pm

House Appropriations & Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair, because we're looking at economic developments and...
  • A lot of the economic development is going.
  • These big tech companies and further development. That's where the families need it.
  • It's about brain development. It's about safety. It's about emotional security.
  • In my human development class, I learned that that's when the brain actually grows the most.
Bills: SB2
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Jefferson County Legislation Committee Apr 17th, 2025

Jefferson County Legislation

Transcript Highlights:
  • sell the five-year permits that right now it's a $7.50 per year. that right now it's a $7.50 per year fee
Bills: HB375, HB494, HB375
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Local Legislation Committee Mar 5th, 2025

Local Legislation

Transcript Highlights:
  • The people get to choose whether they want to support the fire fee or not, and that's really the heart
  • responsibilities, obviously under this when we receive... ...obviously under this when we receive local fire fees
Bills: HB325
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Members without objection to develop in third reading is rescinded.
  • So, think of anywhere in your district where a new housing development or an apartment complex.
  • So, it is something that we Continue to do, and ideally, as developments are happening across the state
  • The goal behind this legislation is to develop the regulatory framework as nuclear energy advances across
  • Well, that is the case if we don't pass and develop a regulatory framework, which is what I'm looking