Video & Transcript Research : 'Class A misdemeanor'

Page 7 of 500
MS

Mississippi 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary, Division A - Room 216, 17 February, 2026; 10:45 AM

Judiciary, Division A

Transcript Highlights:
  • If you look at lines 51, there’s a trigger language, or actually it’s a backstop language, that says
  • I guess my concern is not necessarily a question.
  • /c> my concern is is not necessarily a my concern is is not necessarily a question.<00:02:03.759>
  • It was a very um all went into it.
  • There's been a two-year hodge podge.
Summary: The committee took up a technical fix to last year’s judicial redistricting plan, affecting only parts of Carroll, Grenada, Montgomery, Panola, Tallahatchie, Tate, and Yalobusha Counties. The sponsor explained that the bill corrects issues left out of the prior redistricting legislation, including judgeship/chancellery details and qualifying deadlines. Because the original February 2 qualifying date had already passed, the bill includes backstop language allowing qualifying until May 1, 2026 if the measure is not enacted in time. Senator Turner Ford raised concerns that the bill was changing the law after some judges had already qualified and may have believed they were unopposed, saying the timing felt unfair and that he would likely vote against it. The sponsor responded that a cleanup bill had already been passed, that this measure applies only to the affected district, and that judges and other interested parties had been notified during the two-year redistricting process. He said the changes were necessary technical corrections rather than a hodgepodge approach. The committee then approved the bill, adopting a motion that the title was sufficient and that it do pass. The motion to rise and report also passed, and the bill was sent to Appropriations.
MS

Mississippi 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary, Division A - Room 409, 3 February, 2026; 2:00 P.M.

Judiciary, Division A

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, so we have a number of bills.
  • 00:13:35.600> custody<00:13:36.079> and<00:13:36.320> a recognizes a a physical
  • custody and a recognizes a a physical custody and a legal<00:13:37.440> custody.
  • Do I have<00:20:41.039> a<00:20:41.200> motion? have a motion? have a motion?
  • Uh this is a simple bill. Uh this is a simple bill.
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 2893, a municipalities bill on zoning notice requirements. The committee substitute would require notice of proposed zoning changes to be posted on Facebook, Instagram, and X 30 and 15 days before the hearing, while also continuing newspaper publication, posting on a local website if available, making the proposal available at a government office or library, and extending the appeal period for landowners from 10 to 20 days. Members raised concerns about relying on social media for accurate notice and whether local governments would need accounts on those platforms, but the sponsor said the bill was meant to supplement, not replace, newspaper notice. The bill was described as supported by municipal interests, and the committee adopted a motion for a title sufficient, due pass committee substitute. The committee then considered Senate Bill 2027, which creates a rebuttable presumption that joint physical custody is in the best interest of a child. The sponsor and other senators said the bill is intended to add a tool to existing custody law, not replace the Albright factors or other custody standards, and would apply even where the parents were never married. Questions focused on paternity, how the presumption could be rebutted, and whether distance between parents would defeat equal time; the sponsors said paternity rules would remain unchanged and courts could deviate when joint custody is not feasible, such as when parents live far apart. Senators also asked about chancellors’ reactions, and the sponsor said he had discussed the measure with many of them and had revised the bill in response to prior concerns. The committee then passed the bill on a motion for title sufficient, due pass. Finally, the committee began hearing Senate Bill 2747, a consumer legal funding bill. The sponsor and a representative of the industry described the measure as regulating consumer legal funding, which provides small advances to injured plaintiffs for household expenses while litigation is pending, and distinguishing it from litigation financing, which pays litigation costs. They said the bill would impose consumer protections, require attorney review, prohibit quid pro quo arrangements between funders and law firms, bar law firms from operating side funding businesses, and block foreign money from entering the market. The discussion was informational at this stage, with the witness explaining that the bill is intended to regulate an existing practice and protect consumers and the legal system.
MS

Mississippi 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary, Division A - Room 216, 2 February, 2026; 3:30 PM

Judiciary, Division A

Transcript Highlights:
  • /c> Jed A Jed A uh <00:07:20.579>toh <00:07:21.158>neh <00:07:21.737>xayyowtem <
  • But I have a lot of concerns.
  • That’s a problem.
  • But I have a lot of concerns.
  • A person who is working in the chancery court in another state is counted as a chancery position.
Summary: The meeting focused heavily on proposed changes to Mississippi’s chancery court system, especially Senate Bill 2472 and related bills. The discussion centered on moving or expanding certain chancery court functions, creating a statewide or county-based structure for some positions, and whether those changes would be workable in practice. Speakers repeatedly emphasized that any reform should be functional, not just well-intentioned, and raised concerns about preserving court operations, confidentiality, and the ability of judges and staff to handle cases locally. A major theme was opposition from some chancery judges and related officials, who argued that the proposal could undermine the existing chancery system and create problems for CPS, delinquency matters, and other sensitive cases. Supporters of the reform said the current system is uneven and that a clearer, more modern structure is needed. There was also discussion of a pilot program in LeFlore County and comparisons to practices in Georgia and other states, with some testimony suggesting the pilot showed the concept could work. The transcript also touched on funding and implementation details, including judicial operations funding, budget notes, and the need for a roadmap before moving forward. Several speakers asked for the bill language to be clarified, including specific line references and effective dates, and discussed whether the changes would require amendments to existing law. The exchange ended with continued disagreement over whether the proposal should advance as written or be revised further before action.
MS

Mississippi 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary, Division A - Room 216, 29 January, 2026; 3:00 PM

Judiciary, Division A

Transcript Highlights:
  • you a committee subst a also have before you a committee subst a proposed<00:05:28.639> committee
  • have a motion? have a motion?
  • would be um there was a there was a a would be um there was a there was a a vehicular<00:18:11.440><
  • a a nonprofit?
  • c> a<01:03:35.359> personal holder of a CDL driving a personal holder of a CDL driving a personal
Summary: The committee met to discuss several bills, beginning with a block motion on Senate Bills 2138, 2697, 2707, 2717, and 2726. Those measures were described as code-section updates involving redrawn Supreme Court districts, youth court reforms, Administrative Office of Courts matters, replacement of the MyKids youth court computer system, and Mississippi opioid settlement commission procedures. The committee agreed to take them up together, and the motion to report them title sufficient and due pass carried without opposition. The committee then considered Senate Bill 2890, dealing with the judicial operations fund. Members were told the fund no longer has sufficient revenue to cover court operations and requested judicial raises, and the proposed committee substitute would repeal the fund while conforming related code references. The substitute was adopted and the bill was reported title sufficient and due pass. Senate Bill 2730, granting immunity to nonprofits and churches that open during declared emergencies, was amended with a reverse repealer and then passed as amended. Next, Senate Bill 2135 was explained as a change to jury summons procedures so clerks could use the SEMS active/inactive voter designation and summon only active voters, without removing anyone from the voter rolls. The bill drew no opposition and passed, though a reverse repealer was later requested on similar procedural grounds in other bills. Senate Bill 2360 would create a public registry of entities that, though appearing private, are covered by the Mississippi Tort Claims Act; members discussed whether such entities should also be required to identify themselves on websites and written materials, and an amendment to that effect was adopted. A reverse repealer was then added, and the bill passed as amended. Finally, Senate Bill 2362 was presented as a proposal to create a private cause of action under the Unfair Trade Practices Act, allowing claimants to sue directly while still notifying the Attorney General. The sponsor said the bill would not add extra damages and noted similar laws in other states. The committee discussion was cut off in the transcript before a final vote on that bill is shown.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/09/2026 - House Public Safety & Law Enforcement

Public Safety & Law Enforcement

Transcript Highlights:
  • Was it a group? Was it a mix? Good question.
  • It's just a bit of a mess of terms.
  • So it's a weapon.
  • It's not a resolution, but this bill is a series of declarations, similar to a lot of the bills we've
  • My brother was a, it was not a firefighter, but he was a paramedic with Arizona Fire and Medical Authority
Bills: HB2665, HB2904, HB2917
Summary: The House Committee on Public Safety and Law Enforcement heard three bills. HB 2665, named Cade’s Law, would expand Arizona’s manslaughter statute to cover intentionally directed communications—verbal, written, or electronic—that encourage a minor to die by suicide, while excluding general public commentary and non-directed discussion of suicide or mental health. The sponsor and several parents and suicide-prevention advocates testified in support, emphasizing teen suicide risks and the need to address online communication. Some members raised concerns about ambiguity, peer-to-peer counseling, and whether minors could be swept into the statute. After a verbal amendment clarifying the communication language, the bill passed 10-4 with several members voting present due to drafting concerns. HB 2904 declared fentanyl trafficking across the Arizona-Mexico border a public health crisis and directed state health officials to act within their authority. The sponsor argued the bill was needed to combat cartels and protect Arizona from fentanyl-related deaths. The ACLU of Arizona opposed it, saying the bill used vague and unprecedented terms such as “unlawful invasion,” could sweep in asylum seekers or low-level drug offenders, and might affect bail and sentencing. After a contentious debate over border security, sovereignty, and the bill’s definitions, the committee gave HB 2904 a do pass recommendation by an 8-6 vote. HB 2917 would create a firefighter cancer registry at the Department of Health Services to collect and analyze data on cancer among Arizona firefighters. Firefighter representatives supported the measure as a way to better understand occupational exposure and improve prevention, but members questioned whether the bill’s reporting requirements were truly voluntary, since the draft appeared to require participation and provider reporting of medical information. The sponsor and supporters said the intent was not to mandate disclosure and were open to amendments to clarify consent and privacy. The committee approved the bill 12-1, with one present vote and one absence, while noting that cleanup amendments would be needed before floor consideration.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 3/25/25

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • :15:13.839> a study because we're doing a study because we're doing a pre-ournament<00:15:15.120
  • It's still a big ask: $5 million of taxpayer dollars in a time when we don't have a lot to give.
  • have a dollars in a time when we don't have a lot<00:24:14.400> to<00:24:14.559> give.
  • /c> we have a clearer picture, you know, a we have a clearer picture, you know, a year<00:43:07.440><
  • It's a great bill. your final thoughts. It's a great bill.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Campbell since Talala OSU has a new osteopathic school.
  • And I've got a proclamation I'm gonna read.
  • Piper Riley is a great student and a great kid.
  • a nuclear life cycle innovation campus.
  • And my other announcement is of a personal nature.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • My name is Mike Osborne, and I am a Palm Dad. And let me tell you, it's a ride.
  • He is a liction... and a four-time national champion in showing cattle.
  • Rakelin is a senior from Duncan. She is a three-time state qualifier for golf.
  • Rakelin is a senior from Duncan. She is a three-time state qualifier for golf.
  • So, anyway, here we go, Representative Anthony Moore, a dad and a husband, a lawyer by trade, a golfer