Transcript Highlights:

• There will be no votes taken in today's hearing. There will be no votes taken in today's hearing.
• And then, two, the additional data integrations and planning with DHCS and DDS and any other departments
• of health care, and attempts to end birthright citizenship, and even, just today, the end of the Voting
• Second, integrating health, housing, and human services.
• Second, integrating health, housing, and human services.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Anyone wish to change your vote? Secretary will close the roll. Anyone wish to change your vote?
• Anyone wish to change their vote? Secretary will close the roll. Anyone wish to change their vote?
• Anyone wish to change their vote? Anyone wish to change their vote? Secretary will close the roll.
• Anyone wish to change their vote? Secretary will open the roll. Anyone wish to change their vote?
• Anyone wish to change your vote? Thank you. Anyone wish to change your vote?

Keywords: 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So if you would not vote yes. And even the parish will good provision.
• I care very much about the quality of our food supply and integrity.
• And that's what we're going to vote on. And I'm gonna vote for this bill. But I hear you.
• And that's what we're going to vote on. And I'm gonna vote for this bill.
• I'm gonna wait for my vote to come along.

Transcript Highlights:

• of a white vote.
• One black vote in the state of Texas is worth one-fifth of a white vote.
• I want a few thousand votes in Georgia.
• That's integrity.
• At this time, we'll call for a vote.

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This will require the Department to modernize how it manages the integration of requirements, budgeting
• Without a vote of the members, I brought the amendment to the committee. It passed unavoidably.
• That's what that integration of those different type of platforms with ISR and other capabilities is
• There is a vote on. I'm the only... questioner remaining in the first round. Let me go quickly. Mr.
• Senator Reid, we've got a vote on. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. I'm fine. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.

Keywords: Air Force modernization, fighter aircraft, autonomous systems, air superiority, national security, recapitalization

Summary: The meeting primarily focused on military procurement and modernization, with significant discussions surrounding the Air Force's capabilities and strategic needs. Key topics included the urgent need for recapitalization of the Air Force's fighter squadrons, as well as the importance of integrating new technologies like autonomous systems to bolster military effectiveness. Several senators raised concerns about the current resources available to the Air National Guard and the potential loss of skilled service members if recapitalization plans are not swiftly developed. There were also discussions on the importance of maintaining air superiority in light of evolving threats, particularly from adversaries like China.

Transcript Highlights:

• We currently have five votes with one member not voting.
• Quirk-Silva not voting. Valencia? Zubur? Not voting. Zubur not voting.
• Four aye votes and one no vote, with two members not voting. I'll be on call for absent members.
• Not voting. Valencia, not voting. Current roll is six members, with two not voting.
• Not voting. Could we entertain a vote change? Yes, there's a vote change.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• priorities for people living with TD promoting self-determination, independence, productivity, integration
• But not participate, or, and you can be integrated, or you can be integrated, which means you're actually
• And now we're moving on to integration.
• Um, how do you integrate with the Department of Veteran Services on, because you did mention a veteran
• How do you, how do you integrate with the Department of Veteran Services?

Transcript Highlights:

• They require perspective, integrity, and a collaborative approach.
• They<00:03:33.840> require<00:03:34.240> perspective,<00:03:35.200> integrity,<00
• :03:36.120> and They require perspective, integrity, and They require perspective, integrity,
• Any no votes? 24 eyes. Thank you.
• Any no votes? 24 eyes. Thank you. HB 1752 CD1 passes final reading.

Bills: SB2057, SB2109, SB2400, HB1752, SB2599, SB2930

Keywords: immigration enforcement, sanctuary policy, detainer, ICE, federal immigration authorities, 8 U.S.C. 1357(g), 8 U.S.C. 1373, 8 U.S.C. 1644, deportation, undocumented immigrants, noncitizen, migrant rights, local police cooperation, law enforcement cooperation, hold request, judicial warrant, probable cause, civil immigration enforcement, county police, state police

Transcript Highlights:

• We have our... ...integrity and preventing fraud, waste, and abuse.
• It's crucial, and I am very honored to vote yes. ...in Arizona.
• And so for all of those reasons, I am going to vote no.
• Members, by your vote of three ayes, two nays, and zero not voting, you have recommended to the Senate
• Members, by your vote of three ayes, two nays, and zero not voting, you have recommended to the Senate

Summary: The Senate Committee on Director Nominations met to consider Ruby Dylan Williams for Director of the Arizona Department of Housing. Williams described her long career at the department, her work on operational improvements, housing development, manufactured housing, and efforts to expand supply, preserve existing housing, and improve transparency through data and technology. She also said she would work with the legislature, local governments, tribal nations, nonprofits, and private partners, and emphasized the department’s role in addressing housing affordability and homelessness across the housing continuum. Members questioned her about the department’s response to Auditor General findings, including fraud prevention, payment verification, site inspections, and oversight of grantees. Williams said the department had rewritten policies, retrained staff, added stronger controls, and implemented verbal verification steps for wire transfers after a fraud incident. Senators also pressed her on budget priorities, possible cuts, and her view of homelessness policy, with some members characterizing her approach as closer to shelter or transitional housing before permanent placement. Williams said interventions should be individualized and that the department works with local jurisdictions and service providers to match people with appropriate support. Public testimony was overwhelmingly supportive. Developers, housing industry representatives, and nonprofit partners praised Williams’ private-sector housing finance experience, her knowledge of LIHTC and the QAP process, and her leadership in making the agency more efficient and business-friendly. After debate, the committee voted 3-2 to recommend her confirmation to the full Senate. Two members voted no, citing concerns about her answers on fraud oversight, cost controls, and homelessness policy, while the majority supported advancing her nomination.

Transcript Highlights:

• And I'll just make sure we have a roll call vote. Thank you.
• Chair, I would ask our members to vote no on this bill. It's not ready.
• So members, please vote no on this bill.
• vote no on this bill. It's not ready. vote no on this bill. It's not ready.
• Please vote yes. >> Thank you, Representative Nisca.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair votes I. Chair votes I.
• vice chair for the vote chair votes I. vice chair for the vote chair votes I.
• <01:10:42.880> Senator votes I. Vice Chair votes I. Senator votes I. Vice Chair votes I.
• or votes or present, any no votes or votes or reservations?
• vice chair for the vote chair votes I. vice chair for the vote chair votes I.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The joint committees met on March 19, 2025, to hear HB 966 HD2, which would create statewide standards for agricultural tourism in counties that adopt ag-tourism ordinances. The bill would require registration with county planning departments, require ag-tourism to remain tied to an active farming operation, and end the activity when the agricultural use stops except in limited circumstances. Testimony from the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development, the Agribusiness Development Corporation, the Department of Agriculture, the Hawaii Tourism Authority, Kualoa Ranch, and the Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council was generally supportive of the bill’s intent, with several witnesses emphasizing that agritourism can help farm viability, food security, and public education about agriculture. The Hawaii Farm Bureau and several other testifiers supported agritourism but urged strong guardrails, minimal statewide standards, and deference to county home rule. They said agriculture should remain the primary activity, warned against adding burdens to farmers and ranchers, and suggested better enforcement and agricultural expertise within county planning departments. Phil Weber and others argued for objective standards, such as minimum revenue or work-performed thresholds, annual reporting, and clearer compliance tools, and cautioned that the bill’s termination exemption could be too broad if not tightened. A substantial portion of the discussion focused on whether the bill should apply to Department of Agriculture lands, especially ag park lands, and to DLNR lands. Department of Agriculture staff explained that ag park lands currently do not allow agritourism, while non-ag park lands under Act 90 allow limited related activity tied to farm production, with revenue limits and other conditions. Members and witnesses debated how to define and measure agritourism, how to enforce county rules, and whether to exempt ag park parcels or otherwise clarify that existing DOA rules would control. No vote or final action was taken during the hearing, and the chair requested follow-up language from DOA to address possible exemptions and clarify the bill’s application.

Transcript Highlights:

• Not voting. Hadwick, not voting. Haney, aye. Irwin? Jackson? Jackson, aye. Krall, aye. Lowenthal?
• That bill is out with 11 votes.
• Alanis, not voting. Baines. Barra-Cahan. Coloza. Coloza, aye. Chen. Chen not voting. Alhawari.
• Not voting. Are not voting. Aarons, aye. Alanis? Alanis, no. Barra-Cahan? Coloza? Coloza, aye.
• On AB 957, Ortega, vote change. Alanis? Alanis not voting.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We will have a roll call vote. All right, members, you've heard the motion.
• We will have a roll call vote.
• We will have a roll call vote. Representative McAbarrow, Mr. Chair, can I explain my vote?
• I yield to changing my vote on the floor after speaking with the sponsor.
• I vote aye. Representative Travers? Mr. Chair. Yes, please.

Bills: HB2452, HB2592

Keywords: comprehensive plans, county governance, data centers, zoning, state regulations, land use, energy production, infrastructure, environmental impact, artificial intelligence, government regulation, innovation, procurement, administrative burdens, 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• have a vote.
• You got to have the votes have a vote.
• I think that um he is the votes.
• , voting from overseas.
• Specifically, it places additional hurdles in the way of mail-in voting, voting from overseas.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee held an informational briefing on the State of Hawaii’s affirmative litigation against the federal administration, with no public testimony. Attorney General Lopez and deputies said the office’s goal is to enforce the rule of law, not make partisan points, and noted that Hawaii is involved in 27 ongoing cases. They grouped the cases into four broad areas: immigration, funding freezes and grant terminations, federal agency dismantling/reductions in force, and protecting elections, health, and safety. Several immigration-related cases were discussed in detail. These included a challenge to the federal sharing of Medicaid data with DHS for immigration enforcement, a similar challenge to USDA’s demand for SNAP applicant and recipient data, and litigation over immigration-enforcement conditions attached to federal grants. The office also described the birthright citizenship executive order, saying it conflicts with the 14th Amendment and Supreme Court precedent; lower courts granted preliminary relief, and the U.S. Supreme Court later addressed only the scope of nationwide injunctions, not the merits. In the Department of Transportation case, the court granted a preliminary injunction against the “Duffy directive,” finding the immigration conditions lacked statutory authority, were arbitrary and capricious, and violated the Spending Clause and APA. The briefing also covered multiple funding disputes. In the education funding freeze case, the Department of Education and OMB withheld about $6 billion in formula funds, including roughly $33 million for Hawaii; after suit was filed, the funds were released. Other cases included the termination of over $11 billion in public health grants, which affected Hawaii Department of Health grants, the NIH indirect cost cap case, and NIH grant terminations tied to DEI, transgender issues, and vaccine hesitancy. The speakers said some cases have already resulted in preliminary or permanent injunctions, while others remain on appeal or are still being litigated.

Transcript Highlights:

• voting.
• voting.
• voting.
• voting.
• voting.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• for the vote okay voting on HB for the vote okay voting on HB 1330<02:55:47.439> chair's<
• Members, for the vote. Voting on HB 1376.
• vote uh voting on hb1 vote uh voting on hb1 1376<03:03:04.920> chair's<03:03:05.479> recommendation
• on<03:13:11.399> hb52 the vote thank you voting on hb52 the vote thank you voting on hb52
• We will defer this measure. no vote are there any members voting no vote are there any members voting

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Public Safety Committee held a hearing on House Bill 433, which would appropriate $4 million for Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation re-entry services to connect offenders with community-based services. Director Tommy Johnson said the department supports the bill’s intent but noted the governor’s executive budget already includes $4 million for the same purpose and asked that the measure defer to that budget. Supporters, including the Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission, Community Alliance on Prisons, and the ACLU, backed the funding but urged that it be tied to a clear re-entry plan, performance measures, transparency, and regular reporting to the legislature. They emphasized that re-entry should begin at intake and involve community partnerships, housing, treatment, employment, and family reunification services. Committee members questioned the department about current re-entry services, pre-trial detainees, and how the new funds would be used. Johnson said the department’s current statewide re-entry budget is about $1.5 million to $1.7 million, separate from the larger Corrections Program Services Division budget for in-facility programs. He described the proposed $4 million as supporting a mix of services, including a pilot apprenticeship program, substance abuse treatment, navigator or warm-handoff services, and short-term transitional housing. He also said the department already tracks performance outcomes in its annual report and can provide a matrix showing the intake-to-discharge process, program contracts, and volunteer organizations. The discussion also covered pre-trial detainees, electronic monitoring, and mental health services. Johnson said the department has limited jurisdiction over pre-trial detainees but works with courts to seek supervised release when possible; he noted that many requests are denied, though electronic monitoring has improved release rates somewhat. On mental health, he said the jail is not an ideal therapeutic setting for people found unfit to proceed and suggested a secure community-based step-down facility run by the Department of Health for those needing care above what the jail can provide but below forensic-level treatment. No vote or final action on the bill was taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Simply trying to do is protect the integrity of that data.
• Vote no on HB4503, or at least amend it.
• Vote against this bill. Thank you for your testimony. Members, are there questions?
• Please vote against the bill. Seeing none. For the bill. Thank you.
• As a religious educator, I'm asking that you please vote no on HB3225.

Bills: HB45, HB45, HB755, HB 1232, HB1555, HB2460, HB2702, HB2973, HB3120, HB3225, HB3314, HB3356, HB3371, HB3634, HB3638, HB4247, HB4283, HB4290, HB4302, HB4503, HB4511, HB4565, HB4581, HB4627, HB4632, HB4660, HB4668, HB4960, HB5042

Keywords: flooding, disaster response, emergency preparedness, state guidance, public safety, housing, affordable housing, rent control, landlord-tenant laws, housing rights, lobbying, public entities, expenditures, government code, transparency, Texas Ethics Commission, government regulation, lobbying restrictions, government accountability, taxpayer money

Transcript Highlights:

• days of each audit's release, and the committee takes public testimony, but the committee does not vote
• And it seemed that the pathway of moving towards more... ...integration of testing into training so that
• The Department of Health agrees with the SAO recommendation to continue to integrate testing into training
• Once testing is fully integrated into training programs, this will greatly benefit caregivers.
• And representing DSHS, I just agree that it would be a good change to make to integrate.

Keywords: 904, all

Summary: The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee heard a State Auditor’s Office performance audit on the Restoring Quality Home Care Initiative (I-1163), which created home care aide certification requirements, FBI background checks, and an abuse/neglect registry. Auditors said some requirements likely improve safety, especially background checks and training, but the state lacked pre-2011 data to measure outcomes directly. They also found Washington has a long-term care workforce shortage, though its workforce supply ranks better than many states, and that more stringent entry requirements do not appear to reduce workforce participation compared with other states. The audit’s main concern was that the certification process is slow and burdensome. Auditors reported that most applicants never finish certification, that only about one-third of fiscal year 2025 applicants were certified within the 200-day legal deadline, and that the average time to certification was 463 days. They identified delays between training and testing, limited testing access in some areas, and redundant Department of Health verification of FBI background checks as key causes. The audit recommended streamlining the process by accepting applications later in the process, expanding testing within training programs, and eliminating the redundant background-check verification. Department of Health and Department of Social and Health Services staff largely agreed with the audit’s findings and recommendations. They said they have already made improvements, including moving exams into more than 110 training programs, increasing credentialing staff, and reducing barriers through rule changes. DSHS noted testing is offered in 13 languages. Committee members asked about testing contract incentives, language access, and whether the agencies would seek statutory or budget changes to implement the recommendations. No public testimony was offered, and the meeting adjourned without any vote or formal action by the committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair and Vice Chair vote aye. Any votes in opposition? Any votes with reservations?
• Chair and Vice Chair vote aye. Any votes in opposition? Any votes with reservations?
• Chair and Vice Chair vote aye. Any votes in opposition? Any votes with reservation?
• Chair and Vice Chair vote aye. Any votes in opposition? Any votes with reservation?
• Seeing none, Vice Chair, for the vote: voting on SB 891 with amendments. Chair votes I.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee on Economic Development and Technology heard testimony on several measures, with most witnesses either supporting the bills or offering technical concerns and suggested amendments. On SB 338, testimony came from the Department of Taxation, Tax Foundation of Hawaii, and Surpac, and the bill later moved forward with amendments. On SB 558, testimony was largely in support from the Department of Agriculture, Ulupono Initiative, Local Food Coalition, Hawaii Food Industry Association, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and the Agribusiness Development Corporation, which described the measure as supporting rural jobs, food-system development, and use of off-grade agricultural products. ADC requested flexibility for neighbor-island siting and funding allocations, while the committee also discussed whether the bill’s language should be made more general and whether it could raise constitutional concerns about overly specific site designations. The bill was advanced with amendments and a noted appropriation allocation of $350,000. The committee also heard SB 186, which drew support from the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development, Department of Agriculture, Ulupono Initiative, Hawaii Food Industry Association, Hawaii Farm Bureau, Hawaii Public Health Institute, DED, ADC, AAHU RC&D, and the Hawaii Youth Food Council. Supporters said the measure would improve coordination among agencies on food systems, help address food security and the state’s 30% by 2030 farm-to-school goal, and create a more organized statewide food systems effort. SB 328 received support from the Department of Taxation and Hawaii Farm Bureau, with Farm Bureau describing it as a way to repurpose existing dairy infrastructure to revive hog production and support livestock and farm-to-school goals; the Tax Foundation of Hawaii opposed the measure as a potentially narrow industry incentive that could unfairly benefit a specific taxpayer and said a direct appropriation would be more transparent. SB 89 was described by Hawaii Farm Bureau as a labeling measure intended to protect the integrity of a culturally relevant local product, though the group raised concerns about wording and implementation timing. Later, SB 742 received support from the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, the Office of Wellness and Resilience, the Executive Office on Early Learning, the University of Hawaii System, Hawaii KidsCAN, the Hawaii Workforce Funders Collaborative, and the State Commission on the Status of Women. Testifiers said the bill would improve cross-agency data sharing, support workforce and education planning, and create public-facing dashboards; the Commission on the Status of Women asked to be included in the working group or as an advisory member. In decision-making, the committee adopted amendments and advanced SB 338, SB 558, and SB 1186. For SB 1186, the chair’s recommendation added three positions, specified committee-note funding amounts for those positions and operating funds, and revised working-group membership to have co-chairs appoint five members with relevant experience and expertise.

Transcript Highlights:

• The current vote is 3 to 4, with the Chair voting aye and the Vice Chair voting aye.
• The current vote is 5 to 0, with the Chair voting aye and the Vice Chair voting aye.
• Voting aye and the Vice Chair voting aye.
• The current vote is 3 to 0, with the Chair voting aye and the Vice Chair voting aye.
• Current vote is 3 to 1, with the Chair voting aye and the Vice Chair voting no.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Summary: The committee first heard SB 1377, which would change California’s medical exemption review process for school immunizations. The author and supporters argued the current system has a chilling effect on physicians and can prevent medically vulnerable children from obtaining needed exemptions, while opponents from pediatric, medical, and public health groups said the existing oversight is working and protects against fraudulent exemptions. Committee members debated the data, the bill’s last-minute amendments, and whether the proposal would weaken public health protections; no vote was taken because the committee lacked a quorum, and the bill was held on call. The committee then took up SB 995, the Masuma Khan Justice Act, which would create a statewide inspection and enforcement framework for private detention facilities in California. The author and supporters described alleged medical neglect, unsafe conditions, and lack of accountability in immigration detention, including testimony from Masuma Khan’s daughter about her mother’s treatment at a CoreCivic facility. The California Hospital Association raised concerns about duplicative oversight and possible overlap with already regulated health facilities, but said it was continuing to work on a solution. After discussion about constitutional and jurisdictional issues, the committee voted 5-0 to do pass and re-refer the bill to the Committee on Judiciary, with the vote placed on call. The committee also heard SB 1089, which would expand access to GLP-1 medications for state and local government employees through CalPERS and encourage broader affordability through CalRx. The author framed the bill as a response to chronic weight disease and rising diabetes risk, and the American Diabetes Association and other supporters said GLP-1s can prevent or delay type 2 diabetes and reduce long-term costs. Members discussed the medications’ benefits, side effects, and whether they are a long-term treatment. The bill was moved on a 5-0 vote and placed on call. Finally, the committee began SB 1221, dealing with Murphy conservatorships for people found dangerous due to severe mental illness after serious violent crimes. The author said the bill responds to a court decision that created uncertainty about placement and detention while awaiting state hospital beds, and supporters from prosecutors and psychiatrists said the measure would improve public safety and ensure victims’ voices are heard. Opposition testimony from county behavioral health directors began after the author’s presentation, but the transcript cuts off before the committee completed debate or took action on the bill.