Transcript Highlights:

• I just don't want to vote for something today that sounds narrow and harmless, but later find out it
• correct eminent domain laws that should never have been passed in 2020, with members that actually voted
• . that should never have been passed in 2020 with members that actually voted in that bill stating it
• Your names, your votes, and your decisions will remain attached to whatever happens here for decades
• We're also asking that the bills addressing eminent domain authority and parish-level public votes be

Keywords: 965, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair votes out House Bill 254. Chair recognizes Chairman Ashby to explain the bill. Mr.
• Thank you for the vote. It's a great vote. Thank you. Members, are there questions for Mr. Reed?
• At this time, the Chair calls the vote. Tyler Robertson, and Mr. Kenneth Flippen.
• We urge you to vote in favor of House Bill 117. Thank you very much. Good morning, my name is J.D.
• So these are our vote sheets. That's great. Okay. Thank you.

Bills: HB48, HB 66, HB 68, HB71, HB75, HB164, HB171, HB254, SB 3, SB 18, HB123, HB149, HB117

Keywords: HB 48, Texas alert notification systems, emergency alerts, public warning systems, alert fatigue, notification fatigue, Texas Division of Emergency Management, Department of Public Safety, DPS alerts, emergency management, State of Texas Emergency Assistance Registry, STEAR, disaster notifications, weather alerts, Amber Alert, Silver Alert, Blue Alert, missing persons alerts, accessible alerts, hearing impaired

Transcript Highlights:

• So, I'm going to ask you to please vote So, I'm going to ask you to please vote no<01:31:51.920>
• So 741 Senator the House to take votes.
• So state reps may the voting mode. Okay.
• > encourage you to vote against House Bill encourage you to vote against House Bill 41.<02:32:26.080>
• questions offline. Absolutely. questions offline. Absolutely. Okay. Okay. Okay.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, please vote ITL on this bill.
• So, please vote ITL on this bill. And I'd be happy to take any questions.
• We clarify that offline. Yeah. Either way, I'm happy to come up and just take...
• <02:41:12.800> Either We clarify that offline. Yeah. Either We clarify that offline.
• Oh, did you not vote? I'm still... You're going too fast. Yeah. Okay.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm also okay to vote on this, too. Oh, I'm so sorry. Schultz. That was the deciding vote.
• Not voting. Brian not voting. Alanis? Aye. Connolly? Not voting. Ellis? Aye. Flora? Garcia? Haynie?
• Haney, not voting. Hoover, aye. Hoover, aye. Culra, not voting. Maritzu not voting.
• Meritz, not voting. Meritsuchi, not voting. Pellerin, not voting. Schultz, not voting.
• That has 14 votes. That's... Aye. Haney, aye. Hoover, aye. That has 14 votes.

Summary: The committee hearing centered first on AB 1243, the Polluters Pay Climate Superfund Act of 2025, which would direct CalEPA to identify major fossil fuel companies, study California’s climate damages, and assess fees on the largest polluters to fund resilience, recovery, and related projects. The author and supporters argued the bill would make polluters help pay for climate harms, protect taxpayers, create jobs in construction and clean energy, and dedicate at least 40% of funds to disadvantaged communities. Support testimony came from environmental justice groups, labor, youth advocates, health organizations, and many individual witnesses, while opponents from the building trades, chambers of commerce, petroleum, and business groups warned it would raise fuel and consumer costs, threaten refinery jobs, and create legal and economic uncertainty. Committee members debated the bill’s impact on affordability, jobs, refinery closures, and whether cap-and-trade already addresses climate funding needs. The committee ultimately voted to give AB 1243 a due pass recommendation to the Judiciary Committee, with the roll left open. After AB 1243, the committee moved to another bill on wildfire mitigation and related resilience work. The author said the measure addresses a long-running wildfire problem and accepted committee amendments, describing the bill as a response to increasingly severe wildfire seasons and the need to help communities stay safe and rebuild after disasters. The transcript cuts off as that presentation begins, so no final action on the second bill is shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Voting system software, the Express link of the ESNS voting system, and the Express Vote activation card
• Now you go to early vote where you can vote anywhere again.
• It's it's higher because The you have fewer people voting early vote, about 70% of people vote early,
• vote.
• of votes.

Transcript Highlights:

• I vote no. Senator Kuby votes no.
• I vote no. Mr. Ortiz votes no. Senator Tothley, how do you vote? Senator Tothley.
• So I vote no. Senator Gonzales votes no.
• I vote no. Senator Tsosie votes no.
• So I vote no. Your Senatoration votes no.

Keywords: 1182, all

Summary: The Senate opened with prayers, the Pledge of Allegiance, a journal approval, and a series of guest introductions recognizing groups at the Capitol for Environmental Day, Women’s and Reproductive Health Day, Arizona Nurses Day, Aerospace Day, and International Mother Language Day, along with a Doctor of the Day and a judicial proclamation honoring Justice Daphne Barak-Erez. The chamber also made temporary committee appointments and referred several bills between committees before moving into Committee of the Whole and later third reading votes. The main floor action centered on several SNAP-related bills. SB 1002, dealing with public assistance verification, passed the Committee of the Whole after a Kavanagh floor amendment and then passed third reading 17-9-13, with supporters saying it targets fraud and lowers error rates and opponents arguing it duplicates existing checks, adds bureaucracy, and could harm eligible families. SB 1331, on SNAP military employment and training, SB 1333, on SNAP error-rate audit and penalties, SB 1334, on SNAP work requirement waivers and exemptions, and SB 1368, on SNAP purchase restrictions, all advanced from Committee of the Whole and then passed third reading by the same 17-13 margin, with Democrats and some others warning they would increase hunger, burden rural and tribal communities, and restrict access, while supporters said they promote work, accountability, and healthier choices. The Senate also considered SB 1638, a tax conformity bill. A Sundareshan floor amendment to narrow the bill to standard deduction conformity was debated at length, with supporters saying it would protect most taxpayers from filing confusion and limit revenue loss, and opponents arguing it removed other agreed-upon tax provisions and still left uncertainty. The amendment failed 17-13, the Finance Committee amendment was adopted, and SB 1638 then passed as amended. Finally, SCR 1011, a concurrent resolution calling for a federal constitutional convention on congressional term limits, received a do pass recommendation and passed the Committee of the Whole.

Transcript Highlights:

• Leach voting on. All members voted, Mr. Bhojani voting aye, 125.
• Record vote. Clerk, ring the bell. Mr. Ashby voting aye. Mr. Bernal voting aye. Mr.
• Buckley voting aye. Ms. Johnson voting aye, Mr. Lujan voting aye. Have all members voted?
• Record vote. Clerk, ring the bell. So we're voting aye. Have all members voted?
• Record vote. Clerk, ring the bell. Have all members voted? Have all members voted?

Bills: HB5560, HB2, HB24, HB3233, HB1397, HB2067, HB3133, HB5696, HB5680, HB2885, HB3966, HB3556, HB3595, HB144, HB26, HB2038, HB521, HB4, HB 1178, HB42, HB 1211, HB783, HB3963, HB2240, HB1690, HB 1234, HB3372, HB27, HB4211, HB2243, HB2853, HB4638, HJR7, HB 100, HB 126, HB3783, HB5138, HB2512, HB5616, HB4751, SB17, SB1637, SB1833, SB2155, SB21, SB2778, SB260, SB8, SB12, SB37, SB379, SB441, SB1566, SB2878, HB4112, HB3866, HB4749, HB2844, HB150

Keywords: groundwater, civil penalties, water conservation, drought contingency, environmental protection, public education, teacher compensation, certification, funding, school finance, educator rights, education funding, charter schools, staff compensation, state aid, retention allotment, zoning, public notice, local government, residential development

Transcript Highlights:

• >> Chair votes yes. 11 yay zero nay. >> Chair votes yes. 11 yay zero nay.
• Uh votes yes. Yeah. Uh votes yes. >> 11.<01:15:32.159> Yay.
• >> she voted. She voted yes. >> she voted. She voted yes.
• vote to change it. Thank you, Mr. vote to change it. Thank you, Mr.
• We're we're voting on CACR22. the role. We're we're voting on CACR22.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Is anyone not voted on that? It's eight to zero. Everyone's voted? Yes.
• voting no.
• Is anyone not voted on that? It's eight to zero. Everyone's voted? Yes.
• voting no.
• voting aye.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Committee on Housing met without a quorum at first and operated as a subcommittee, then later established a quorum and took up several housing-related bills. Early presentations focused on AB 2390, a cleanup measure to clarify streamlined housing approvals and how modifications are reviewed; AB 1890, which would increase state matching funds for Napa County farmworker housing centers; and AB 956, which would clarify accessory dwelling unit law by allowing more flexibility in how ADUs are built and by clarifying application of ADU protections in common interest developments. Supporters for these bills emphasized predictability, farmworker housing stability, and expanded housing options for multigenerational families, while opponents of AB 956 raised concerns about neighborhood density, infrastructure, and local control. AB 956 drew the most extensive debate. Committee members discussed whether it was a clarification or expansion of ADU law, the potential for triggering density bonus rules, and possible local government costs. The author accepted committee amendments to avoid allowing a third ADU/JADU combination that could trigger density bonus implications. The committee then voted to do pass AB 956 as amended to the Senate Committee on Local Government, with one no vote recorded and the bill held on call for absent members. The committee also took votes on the consent calendar and on AB 2390 and AB 1890, but those measures were likewise held on call for absent members after favorable motions. The committee also heard AB 939, which would let developers transfer income-restricted ownership units to qualified nonprofit affordable housing organizations without waiting 180 days after certificate of occupancy. Supporters, including Habitat for Humanity and California YIMBY, said the bill would reduce vacancy, carrying costs, and help preserve long-term affordability. The California Association of Realtors opposed the bill unless amended, arguing it could limit buyer choice, codify first-right-of-refusal practices, and reduce wealth-building opportunities for families. After discussion, the bill was moved to the Senate Appropriations Committee on a do pass motion and held on call. Later bills included AB 1165, which would require state housing agencies to create a fiscal analysis and financial plan for ending homelessness; AB 1184, which would add transparency and open-meeting style requirements for homeowners associations; and AB 2035, a narrowly tailored measure to help Laguna Woods Village update outdated CC&Rs by lowering the vote threshold needed to seek court approval. AB 1165 and AB 2035 both received broad support and were moved forward on do pass motions, while AB 1184 also advanced despite late opposition from the California Association of Realtors. The committee then began hearing AB 1573, which would add survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking to local housing element target populations, but the transcript cuts off before that bill’s testimony or any vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, I'll check that offline, sir. Okay, any questions for Ms. Fedor?
• Uh<00:28:29.600> I'll<00:28:29.760> check<00:28:30.000> that<00:28:30.200> offline
• Uh I'll check that offline, sir. Uh I'll check that offline, sir.

Bills: HF1016, HF2800, HF156, HF3051, HF526, HF2658, HF2062, HF2801

Keywords: local government aid, Baldwin, taxation, base year formula, municipal funding, population aid, aid penalty forgiveness, Minnesota, city funding, appropriations, HF156, lawful gambling, veterans organizations, licensed veterans organization, Minnesota gambling law, gross profits, lawful purpose, real property repair, facility maintenance, capital assets

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, I would ask Representative Huot if you could take your question offline because we want to get to
• could take Representative Hwitt if you could take your<01:26:30.000> question<01:26:30.400> offline
• because<01:26:31.280> we<01:26:31.440> want<01:26:31.520> to your question offline
• because we want to your question offline because we want to get<01:26:31.760> to<01:26:32.000

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• We've been putting together some different reports, and we could take that offline unless you want to
• ><00:31:43.320> could<00:31:43.880> take<00:31:44.039> that<00:31:44.200> offline
• and and but we could take that offline and and but we could take that offline unless<00:31:45.440

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• What the language is intended to say, and we're more than happy to meet offline and look at clarifying
• happy<01:14:25.800> to<01:14:26.120> to<01:14:26.440> meet<01:14:26.719> offline
• and<01:14:27.320> and<01:14:27.440> look<01:14:27.639> at Happy to meet offline
• Let's do follow up with this some offline, because if it really doesn't mean a lot, then why is it in

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• support and looking forward to the vote. support and looking forward to the vote.
• the role and the chair votes. Yes. the role and the chair votes. Yes.
• The chair votes I. Chair Pinto votes I. The chair votes I. Chair Pinto votes I.
• <01:37:33.280> Mueller<01:37:33.679> votes Representative Mueller votes no.
• Representative Schultz votes no. Representative Zeleznikar votes no.

Bills: HF3228, HF2441

Keywords: workers' compensation, insurance programs, employee protection, Minnesota statutes, safety regulations, prevailing wage, certified payroll, payroll reporting, construction contracts, public works, project registration, labor standards, contractor compliance, subcontractor reporting, state government, Department of Administration, Commissioner of Labor and Industry, Metropolitan Council, highway construction, public construction

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair votes aye. Vice Chair votes aye. Senator Richards is excused. Senator Fevella votes aye.
• Chair votes aye. Vice Chair, for the vote.
• Chair votes aye. Vice Chair, for the vote.
• vote<00:32:27.159> I<00:32:27.399> senator excuse I vote I senator excuse I vote I
• Chair votes aye. Vice Chair votes aye. Senator Richards is excused. Senator Fevella votes aye.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committees heard testimony on SB 1221 and SB 1222, both relating to storm water management and detention/retention ponds. Testifiers, including the Department of Health, the Hawaiian Lifeguard Association, and a family member affected by a drowning death in a poorly maintained detention pond, strongly supported stronger statewide safety standards, inspections, and maintenance requirements. Several speakers urged that the bills be combined or aligned so they would cover both existing and future ponds, and there was discussion about whether responsibility should remain with DOH or be shifted to DLNR, which members said has more relevant expertise. The committee ultimately amended SB 1221 to move responsibilities from DOH to DLNR, add two positions, and include existing ponds, then passed SB 1221 with amendments. SB 1222 was deferred. The committees also heard SB 1432, concerning changes to the Department of Health’s responsibilities related to Kalaupapa as the patient population declines. DOH testified in support, saying the bill begins the conversation about future responsibilities after there are no longer patients at Kalaupapa. Testimony from K
4dhana O Kalaupapa, descendants, and community members emphasized that the affected community and other stakeholders should be included in planning, and several speakers asked for more detail on the state’s transition plan, financial responsibilities, and preservation of the site’s cultural and historical significance. Members discussed the need for a coordinated plan among DOH, DLNR, and DHHL, and asked for more detailed cost information and a clearer roadmap. The committee passed SB 1432 with amendments, including stakeholder consultation language and a requirement for a state plan and financial details to be reported back. Later, the committees heard SB 1339, which would create a program to characterize statewide carbon sequestration potential and underground water resources. DBEDT and the Chief Energy Officer testified in support, describing it as part of a broader coordinated effort involving DHHL, DBEDT, the University of Hawaii, and the Energy Office to advance geothermal and related research. No vote or final action on SB 1339 was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Alanis, not voting, but making a yes on the floor. Alameida, not voting. Aye. Gonzales, aye. Haney.
• , with some members not voting.
• Not voting. Sharp Collins not voting. All right. Thank you everyone. We have three vote.
• Vote yes.
• Alanis: Not voting. Gonzales: Aye. Haynie. Harbedian. Lackey: Not voting. Lackey not voting.

Summary: The committee heard several public safety-related bills. AB 383 by Assembly Member Davies would expand and clarify firearm restrictions tied to juvenile adjudications, allow certain minor firearm possession for hunting or training with guardian approval, and authorize warrants in some domestic violence-related firearm surrender situations. Supporters, including a district attorney representative, argued it would close gaps in existing law and improve public safety; opponents said it would over-criminalize youth and disproportionately affect marginalized communities. The bill passed as amended to Appropriations. AB 400 by Assembly Member Pacheco would require law enforcement K-9 units to meet statewide POST standards covering training, use of force, and handler skills. Supporters said the bill would create consistency, accountability, and safer deployments; opponents argued the standards were inadequate and would legitimize harmful canine practices. After debate over whether the bill expanded canine use or simply standardized it, the committee approved AB 400 and sent it to Appropriations. AB 380 by Assembly Member Gonzalez would extend price-gouging protections during emergencies, including for hotels, food, essential goods and services, and commercial property, and would remove the 12-month lease limit loophole for rent gouging. Supporters said the bill responds to wildfire-related exploitation and provides clarity for disaster victims; business and landlord groups warned it could amount to commercial rent control and create uncertainty for future emergencies. The author said he would continue working on amendments, and the bill passed as amended to Appropriations. AB 358 by Assembly Member Alvarez would create a narrow exception to Cal-ECPA so law enforcement could inspect tracking or surveillance devices found in a person’s home, vehicle, or property with the finder’s consent. Supporters said the change would help stalking and domestic violence victims preserve evidence quickly; privacy advocates argued warrants and existing emergency exceptions already cover these situations. The chair proposed narrowing the language to “tracking or surveillance device,” and the bill was held on call after an initial roll with only three votes in favor. The transcript also began AB 247, which would raise pay for incarcerated hand crew firefighters, with testimony from formerly incarcerated firefighters in support, but the discussion was not completed in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• I urge you to vote no.
• I respectfully ask you to vote yes.
• So please vote in opposition.
• I would advocate you vote no. I would advocate you vote no.
• I urge you to please vote.

Summary: The committee first heard HB 245, which would replace references in Florida law to “child pornography” with “child sexual abuse material.” The sponsor said the change was overdue and more accurately reflects the criminal nature of the material. There was brief supportive public testimony, no debate, and the bill was reported favorably on a unanimous vote. The committee then took up HB 237 on the use of professional nursing titles. The sponsor said advanced practice registered nurses should be able to use earned academic titles such as DNP or PhD. Supporters testified in favor, there was no opposition or debate, and the bill passed unanimously and was reported favorably. The longest discussion centered on HB 173, which would expand parental consent and access requirements for minors’ medical care, medical records, certain school surveys, and biomedical devices. Supporters argued it restores parental rights and keeps parents involved in children’s health decisions, while opponents—many from medical, mental health, LGBTQ, and youth advocacy groups—warned it could block access to STI treatment, mental health care, crisis hotlines, and confidential services for vulnerable youth, including those in abusive homes. After extensive testimony and debate, the bill was reported favorably on a 19-7 vote. Finally, the committee began HB 327 on uterine fibroid research. The sponsor explained the bill would require health care providers to submit identified data so the Department of Health can build a usable de-identified research database, after prior implementation problems with duplicate or unverified data. A supportive local official testified, and members indicated support as the meeting moved toward a vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, happy to take feedback and questions and suggestions, or to talk offline.
• So, happy to take feedback and questions and suggestions, or to talk offline.
• Um, I have a bunch of questions and we can meet offline because I know that this is, like, in the works
• Article 8 outlines rulemaking authority of the compact, and again, if a state decides that they want to vote
• So, happy to chat offline and see if I can find some of that for you. >> Good to go, Chair Jordan. >>

Bills: HF3635, HF3638

Keywords: teacher mobility, interstate compact, licensure, military spouses, education, teacher regulation, teacher qualifications, state sovereignty, educator licensing, paraprofessional credentials, mental health, professional development, data sharing, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• My background: I started my career as a public defender, but I am a voting rights lawyer who has spent
• Um, I'm thinking of one in particular, and it's a complicate—how about if I talk to you offline on it
• about if I talk um it's a complicate how about if I talk to<01:04:46.680> you<01:04:46.920> offline
• 47.319> on<01:04:47.440> it<01:04:47.640> it's<01:04:47.799> just to you offline
• on it it's just to you offline on it it's just complicated<01:04:49.160> thanks<01:04:50.160>

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The committee held its first meeting on February 10, 2025, with member and staff introductions and opening remarks from Chair Kristin Robbins about the committee’s bipartisan mission to address state fraud and improve oversight of executive branch spending. Robbins said the committee would focus on both legislation and informational oversight hearings, likely in coordination with standing policy committees, and emphasized concerns about reported fraud in state government and the need to prevent waste before it occurs. Members from both parties generally expressed support for the committee’s work and interest in learning more about the issues. The sole agenda item was a presentation from the Legislative Auditor on the 2023 report, “Oversight of State-Funded Grants to Nonprofit Organizations.” Legislative Auditor Judy Randall and Deputy Legislative Auditor Jodi Munson Rodriguez explained that the report reviewed how comprehensive Minnesota’s grants management policies are and how well agencies follow them. They said the policies cover the grant lifecycle but often lack detail, and the office found widespread noncompliance in recent years. The presentation included examples such as limited standards for progress reports, flexible monitoring requirements, and no required timeline for closeout reviews. The auditors also noted that state agencies spent an average of about $514 million annually on nonprofit grants from fiscal years 2018 through 2022, with about 2,400 nonprofit organizations receiving grants. The auditors said several factors contribute to compliance problems, including inconsistent funding for grants management, limited training, and uneven use of electronic grants systems. They also noted that statutes gave little authority to enforce compliance. Since the report was released, the Department of Administration has taken some steps, including changes to pre-award financial review policies and a timeline for closeout reviews, but the auditors said other recommendations remain only partially implemented. No votes were taken and no bills were acted on at this meeting.