Transcript Highlights:

• <00:26:30.240> related<00:26:31.200> to are exemptions related to are exemptions related
• And then on the non-exempt vehicles, what's an example there?
• And then on the non-exempt vehicles, what's an example there? Mr.
• There are programs that are license-exempt, and then there are programs that are licensed-exempt but
• programs that are licensed exempt are programs that are licensed exempt but<00:53:52.480> get<

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The committee met for an introductory overview of its jurisdiction and budget, with the chair emphasizing the committee’s role over a large portfolio of children, youth, and family programs and the new Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF). House Research and House Fiscal staff explained their roles and described the 2023-24 reorganization that transferred many programs from DHS, DPS, MDH, and MDE to DCYF, along with a statute recodification and a crosswalk resource for members. Doug Berg then walked through the committee’s budget structure, explaining the difference between all-funds and general fund views, the major funding sources, and how forecasted programs and grant bases roll forward. He highlighted that the committee’s general fund base is a little over $2.1 billion for the biennium, with large federal components such as SNAP and TANF, and noted smaller accounts including child protection-related opioid funds and federal reimbursement offsets (FFP) for administrative costs. Members asked several questions about federal financial participation, TANF, and the effect of the repeal of the Diversionary Work Program (DWP). Staff explained that FFP generally applies to administrative costs for federally related programs and usually does not change much unless program activity changes, while TANF is a block grant that has been stable for years. On DWP, staff said the program was sunsetted effective March 1, 2026, and that the associated funding and administrative costs were being reworked rather than simply removed. A member also asked about federal funding fluctuations; staff said no changes were currently factored in, though SNAP or other federal policy changes could alter future numbers. Danielle Penelli then presented on economic assistance and employment supports transferred to DCYF, focusing first on MFIP, Minnesota’s state-supervised, county-administered welfare program jointly funded by state and federal dollars. She explained that MFIP provides cash and food assistance, employment and training services, and related supports, with a 60-month time limit and certain exemptions for illness, incapacity, or other barriers to employment. She also described the program’s income and asset standards, including a $10,000 asset limit with exclusions for homesteads and one vehicle per assistance unit member age 16 or older. Members asked clarifying questions about how the time limit applies and what assets count, and staff responded that the limit applies to the caregiver and does not restart with additional children. Penelli also introduced support services grants, which fund employment services for MFIP, DWP, and SNAP participants through workforce centers, counties, tribes, and community agencies, and help cover some county and tribal administrative costs. She began outlining nutrition programs under DCYF, including SNAP, the Minnesota Food Assistance Program, the Minnesota Food Shelf Program, the Emergency Food Assistance Program, and the American Indian Food Sovereignty Program. No formal votes or bill actions were taken during this meeting; it was primarily an informational staff briefing and question-and-answer session.

Transcript Highlights:

• This is a public records exemption, Senate Bill 300, for appellate clerks.
• Last year, the Legislature enacted a public records exemption for the personal information of trial court
• Last year, the Legislature enacted a public records exemption for the personal information of trial court
• The exemption will provide protection for the personal information of appellate clerks commensurate with
• Senate Bill 302 creates a public records exemption for the personal information of current and former

Summary: The Judiciary Committee considered four bills. SB 300 would extend a public records exemption for personal information of appellate court clerks and their spouses and children, mirroring protections already given to trial court clerks; after one support appearance and brief debate about harassment risks, it passed 8-1 and was reported favorably. SB 302 would create a similar exemption for current and former Judicial Qualifications Commission employees, citing doxing, threatening calls and emails, and social media intimidation; it passed 9-1 and was also reported favorably. The committee then took up SB 262, which makes technical changes to the Florida Trust Code, including clarifying trust decanting authority, limiting successor trustee actions where beneficiaries are barred, aligning ademption-by-satisfaction rules with the probate code, and clarifying that transferring homestead property into a community trust does not trigger reassessment. An amendment making the changes retroactive as clarifying and remedial was adopted, and the bill passed unanimously 10-0 and was reported favorably. Finally, SB 322 would create a nonjudicial process for commercial property owners to ask the sheriff to remove unauthorized persons from commercial real estate, similar to the recently enacted residential squatter-removal process. Two amendments were adopted to authorize reasonably necessary force and correct cross-references, and the bill passed unanimously and was reported favorably. The committee adjourned after one senator later asked to be recorded as voting yes on SB 300.

Transcript Highlights:

• The problem is that veterans must be disabled to qualify for the tax exemption, yet their disability
• As you know, the disabled veterans property tax exemption is a crucial tool in helping veterans with
• It'll expand KETFA's sales and use tax exemption program.
• It'll expand KETFA's sales and use tax exemption program.
• Senate Bill 296 provides a property tax exemption for 100% disabled veterans.

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Revenue and Taxation heard several bills focused on transit funding, veterans’ tax relief, clean energy incentives, housing development costs, and tax conformity. SB 63 would authorize a Bay Area regional sales tax measure for transit agencies facing fiscal shortfalls; supporters said it was needed to avoid major service cuts, while the California Taxpayers Association opposed it on Proposition 13/218 concerns. SB 56 would exclude veterans’ disability compensation from income calculations for the disabled veterans’ property tax exemption, and SB 296 would expand property tax relief for 100% disabled veterans and certain surviving spouses; both drew broad veterans’ support. SB 86 would extend and expand the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority sales and use tax exemption program, including fusion energy, and SB 302 would conform state tax law to federal clean energy credit monetization provisions; both were backed by industry, labor, and clean energy advocates. SB 328 would cap Department of Toxic Substances Control fees on contaminated-soil remediation for infill and master-planned housing projects, with housing groups arguing the current fee structure can make projects infeasible. SB 711 would update California’s tax conformity date to January 1, 2025 to reduce complexity and inconsistencies with federal law, and was supported by tax professionals and business groups. Several bills were held or sent to suspense, while others advanced with amendments. After quorum was established, SB 63 passed the committee 4-2 and SB 86, SB 302, SB 328, and SB 711 were referred to suspense, with SB 86 and SB 302 later approved out of suspense with amendments. SB 56 was held in committee, SB 296 was made a two-year bill, and SB 284 and SB 723 were held. The committee also approved a number of additional suspense-file bills, including SB 293, SB 359, SB 419, SB 587, SB 603, SB 663, SB 710, and SB 785, while SB 591 was approved with amendments and SB 353 was made a two-year bill. The hearing concluded with the committee adjournment after final roll calls and bill actions.

Transcript Highlights:

• And there's a public records exemption that accompanies this bill that we're going to discuss after hopefully
• threats that are on code enforcement officials, I had a bill a couple of years ago that actually exempted
• It just had to be a separate bit of legislation because it's a public records exemption.
• It would exempt things like images of minors, visible prescription medications, or It would exempt things
• Second, the bill amends Section 893 to exempt from the list of Schedule I controlled substances zylazine

Summary: The Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice heard and approved several bills. SB 504 and its related public records bill SB 506, both by Sen. Burgess, would allow local governments to authorize code enforcement officers to use body cameras under standardized policies and create a public records exemption for certain recordings; members raised questions about disclosure and when cameras may be used, and both bills were reported favorably. The committee also approved CS/SB 32 and SB 210 by Sen. Sharif, creating a new injunction for protection against serious violence by a known person and extending public records protections to petitions under that injunction category. Supporters included law enforcement, women’s advocacy groups, and justice organizations. The committee then favorably reported SB 676 by Sen. Arrington, which creates a graduated penalty structure for adults who involve minors in certain animal cruelty offenses and increases penalties related to fighting or baiting animals. SB 432 by Sen. Yarbrough was also approved; it adds certain concentrated 7-OH to Schedule I, exempts FDA-approved veterinary xylazine products, creates penalties for candy-like xylazine products, and establishes trafficking penalties for xylazine. Sen. Osgood spoke in support of the bill, emphasizing the dangers of adulterated street drugs for people with substance use disorder. Finally, the committee approved SB 524 by Sen. Simon, which makes a series of technical and administrative changes affecting the Medical Examiners Commission, district medical examiner appointments, the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission, and notice procedures for administrative complaints. The Florida Department of Law Enforcement appeared in support. All measures were reported favorably, and the committee adjourned without objection.

Transcript Highlights:

• AB 911, Carrillo, advanced clean fees exemption: do pass out on an A roll call.
• AB 911, Corrio, advanced clean fees exemption: do pass out on an A roll call.
• AB 1485, Macedo, tribal land tax exemption: do pass out on an A roll call.
• AB 388, Rogers, hydrogen production exemption: holding committee.
• AB 66, Tangipa, Sequa Exemption Egress Route Project: do pass on an A roll call.

Summary: The Assembly Appropriations Committee held its May 23, 2025 suspense hearing and opened by emphasizing the difficult budget environment, rising costs for constituents, and the need to make tough choices. The chair said many bills would be held, amended to reduce costs, or made two-year bills because the state could not afford broad program expansions this year. The committee also noted the agenda was organized alphabetically by author and that results would be posted later that day. The committee then acted on a large suspense file, taking up hundreds of Assembly bills across topics including housing, health care, education, labor, public safety, climate, water, transportation, elections, and technology. Many bills were held in committee, while many others were approved with cost-saving, clarifying, or author’s amendments. Examples included measures on CalABLE, Covered California enrollment, wildfire and insurance issues, reproductive health, school and college programs, prison and juvenile justice matters, AI and data privacy, and local government and utility regulation. Several bills were converted to two-year bills to continue discussion. Throughout the hearing, the committee repeatedly voted on bills by A roll call or B roll call, often with Republicans not voting on amended measures. Some bills were advanced with notable amendments, such as narrowing scope, removing appropriations, delaying implementation, or striking costly provisions. The committee also approved a number of committee bills and omnibus measures, including emergency management, judiciary, insurance, and water-related bills. At the end of the hearing, the chair stated that the committee had moved 435 bills to the Assembly floor, either as do pass or do pass as amended, and adjourned the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• for the disabled veterans tax exemptions for the disabled veterans tax exemptions and<00:12:53.240
• qualify for a property tax exemptions qualify for a property tax exemptions and<00:13:04.160>
• <00:14:40.839> that veterans tax credits or exemptions that veterans tax credits or exemptions
• <00:14:59.080> to veterans tax credit or exemption to veterans tax credit or exemption to
• > you<00:15:25.680> need<00:15:25.920> to exemptions and credits, you need to exemptions

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I just have a question about the exemption language.
• It appears to me from this that only Dodge and Olmsted counties are eligible to have an exemption.
• I just have a question about the exemption language.
• create an organ ordinance and exempt create an organ ordinance and exempt themselves<00:23:47.799
• Our residents will be exempted from that, but the DNR is very well aware of this.

Bills: HF647, HF2824, HF1249, HF623, HF820

Keywords: water appropriation, aquifer management, potable water, water conservation, environmental policy, fishing regulation, angling, sustainability, biodiversity, game fish, Carley State Park, Minnesota state parks, state lands, park boundary expansion, Wabasha County, Department of Natural Resources, DNR, public lands, land acquisition, park addition

Transcript Highlights:

• The proposed amendments to the bill would remove language exempting certain real estate schools from
• The lack of a size restriction on community solar and remote net metering creates exemptions from the
• It doesn't create a new exemption or establish a new policy.
• It doesn't create a new exemption or establish a new policy.
• While the DOL rule includes exemptions for our professions, these exemptions are open to misinterpretation

Keywords: 1146, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Specifically, HB 285 as amended clarifies the scope of the exemption, including that it applies only
• . exemption, including that it applies only to a disabled veteran's primary residence.
• This bill provides important clarifications to the disabled veteran property tax exemption.
• Okay, and then on page five, when you were looking at the property owner claiming an exemption, that
• Exemption, and that gives them an additional 180 days to come back with their certification.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• For individuals receiving SNAP, if you're age 16 to 59 and are able to work and are not exempt, you are
• Exemptions include being physically or mentally unable to work, caring for a child under the age of 18
• Exemptions include being physically or mentally unable to work, caring for a child under the age of 18
• One is just on slide four about the impact of HR1 as it pertains to exemptions.
• ...181,000 people who currently have an exemption that don't. Is that accurate?

Summary: The Human Services Subcommittee met to receive implementation briefings on House Bill 1267, which was enacted to address benefit cliffs and help public assistance recipients move toward economic self-sufficiency. The Department of Children and Families reviewed SNAP, Temporary Cash Assistance (TCA), and Medicaid-related eligibility and work requirements, including who must participate in work activities, the role of Florida Commerce and CareerSource Florida, and the new standardized intake and exit surveys required by the law. Members also discussed the TCA program’s household-based structure, the 48-month adult limit, and how work requirements differ for SNAP and TCA participants. Florida Commerce and CareerSource Florida then reported on implementation of HB 1267, including the CLIFF financial forecasting tool, case management changes, and survey data collected from welfare transition participants. They said intake surveys showed common barriers such as child care, transportation, and flexible work schedules, while exit surveys showed many participants were employed or had gained credentials, though response rates were low because the surveys are voluntary. A local workforce board, CareerSource Tampa Bay, described using CLIFF in case management and shared a success story about a participant who completed training, earned certifications, and moved into employment. The committee also heard a separate DCF briefing on the federal One Big Beautiful Bill Act and its impact on SNAP. DCF said the law expands able-bodied adult without dependents requirements, changes non-citizen eligibility, ends future SNAP-Ed funding, increases state administrative cost sharing, and may require states to share in benefit costs if payment error rates remain above federal thresholds. Members focused heavily on Florida’s SNAP payment error rate, which DCF said was 15.13% for federal fiscal year 2024 and 12.60% for 2023, with the state currently on a corrective action plan. DCF described steps to reduce errors, including more verification of rent and utility expenses, improved income matching, staff training, and system modernization. No votes were taken, and the meeting adjourned after questions concluded.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:32:13.600> uh something as having a tax exemption uh something as having a tax exemption
• qualify for an educational tax exemption qualify for an educational tax exemption um<00:36:40.160
• <00:37:15.319> properties tax exemption properties tax exemption properties um<00:37:18.040
• um but looking at educational exemptions um but looking at educational exemptions we<00:37:20.800
• <00:37:45.280> uh for an educational tax exemption uh for an educational tax exemption uh

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh we exempted the first $6,000 per Uh we exempted the first $6,000 per Uh we exempted the first $6,000
• So, the exemption would be $12,000 that. So, the exemption would be $12,000 that.
• It changes of the dependent exemption. It changes of the dependent exemption.
• For taxpayers that are exemption. For taxpayers that are exemption.
• So, we're the with an exemption. So, we're the with an exemption.

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, C.S.S.B. 2658, brackish groundwater permitting exemption, committee substitute.
• The committee substitute Senate Bill 2658 gives exemptions to those who are developing those brackish
• So it removes those exemptions. With that, it moves to suspend the regular order of business.
• Texas has a long history of protecting such exemptions.”
• “Texas has a long history of protecting such exemptions.

Summary: The Senate first adopted a motion to move the intent calendar deadline to 4 p.m. and then took up several bills by suspending the regular order of business. Senate Bill 2031, concerning removal of high fences around breeder deer release sites, passed after an amendment shortened the testing period from five years to three, tied visible identification requirements to the date Parks and Wildlife began requiring them, and made the bill effective immediately. Senate Bill 1490, a cleanup to adult charter high school funding, and Committee Substitute Senate Bill 2227, creating a process for delayed birth certificates and renamed the Charles E. Barton Act, both passed unanimously after floor amendments. Committee Substitute Senate Bill 1964, regulating artificial intelligence systems used by state agencies, also passed unanimously after the author described guardrails for high-risk AI and disclosure requirements. The Senate then considered Senate Bill 2877, which increases penalties for election fraud and related attempts; after debate over whether existing law already covers some conduct and whether the bill was necessary given the small number of convictions, it passed to engrossment and later final passage on a 21-10 vote. Committee Substitute Senate Bill 2658, on brackish groundwater production and study, passed after four amendments, including one giving water districts authority to stop production if monitoring shows harm to freshwater supplies or subsidence and another returning a portion of transported water revenue to districts. Committee Substitute Senate Bill 648, strengthening recording requirements for real property instruments to help prevent deed theft, also passed on a 26-4 vote. Other measures approved included Committee Substitute Senate Bill 401, making it easier for homeschool students to participate in UIL activities through local district opt-in/nearest-district participation rules; Committee Substitute Senate Bill 407, requiring health care facilities to honor conscience or religious vaccine exemptions for employees, despite extensive questioning about patient safety and immunocompromised patients; Committee Substitute Senate Bill 2117, creating a Texas Committee on Foreign Investment to review risky foreign acquisitions; Senate Bill 1718, adding the NRA annual meeting to the major events reimbursement program after a failed amendment seeking equal space for gun-control advocacy; Committee Substitute Senate Bill 1626, clarifying limits on censorship and interference with digital expression by social media platforms; and Senate Bill 2206, updating the state R&D franchise tax credit and related sales tax treatment, which passed 31-0. The chamber also debated Senate Bill 1395 on school health advisory councils. An initial amendment to restore voting seats for teachers and school employees failed, but a later amendment by Senator West added students back in an advisory, non-voting capacity. The Senate then handled routine motions, committee scheduling, first-reading referrals, and adjourned until April 29, with the session ending in memory of two constituents.

Transcript Highlights:

• > Basically, um the statute doesn't Basically, um the statute doesn't explicitly<00:10:00.720> exempt
• However, the board may exempt oral surgeons and dentist anesthesiologists from that requirement.
• <00:22:43.520> oral However, the board may exempt oral However, the board may exempt oral
• <00:23:08.159> So exemption for the under 13 age group.
• So exemption for the under 13 age group.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee opened with routine business, approving the prior meeting minutes and adopting the consent calendar without objection. It then postponed the Board of Licensed Dieticians and the Board of Accountancy items to next month, with a waiver granted for the dieticians item so it could be carried over. The committee also noted that the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources interim rule would be discussed further, and staff flagged a specific concern about authority over kindling size for category 3 fires under NCR 5601.04. The Board of Registry and Optometry received conditional approval. Staff said the board had addressed editorial comments, but raised one substantive issue about the drug formulary: the statute requires posting it online but does not clearly exempt it from rulemaking, suggesting a possible legislative carveout may be needed. The committee agreed to add that issue to a list of legislative suggestions for later consideration. The DNCR interim fire rule was the main contested item. Committee members and staff discussed whether the rule exceeded authority by regulating kindling for category 3 fires, and the agency explained that the regular rules had expired and interim rules were needed quickly for public safety and permit enforcement. The committee ultimately granted conditional approval on the interim rule 25-4, with the understanding that the agency would continue regular rulemaking and address the objection. The Board of Examiners’ dental rules were then reviewed. The agency explained that it revised the rules to address prior concerns about anesthesia and sedation for children, including a pathway for oral surgeons and dentist anesthesiologists to obtain exemptions for under-13 patients, a pediatric minimal sedation permit, and a moderate sedation permit with pediatric qualification. Members also discussed whether the rules were consistent with House Bill 470; staff and members concluded they appeared compatible and would not require additional rulemaking. The committee approved the dental rules, and then adjourned after no further business.

Transcript Highlights:

• In fact, they can seek a medical exemption or a religious exemption. Thank you, Mr.
• exemption.<01:12:29.440> Okay.
• enable parents to exempt their children. enable parents to exempt their children.
• referring to is the medical exemption referring to is the medical exemption process.<03:00:19.279
• guess that those exemptions are only guess that those exemptions are going<03:09:48.000> to<03

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That's what makes you a tax-exempt charity.
• <00:08:26.400> charity what makes you a tax uh exempt charity what makes you a tax uh exempt
• <00:08:51.440> from know that 501 c3s which are exempt from know that 501 c3s which are exempt
• <00:09:40.120> dollars are actually raising tax exempt dollars are actually raising tax exempt
• <01:22:25.199> for allowing sort of of an exemption for allowing sort of of an exemption for

Bills: HF72, HF66, HF69, HF73

Keywords: campaign finance, state funding, political activity, nonprofits, government transparency, HF66, Minnesota second-degree murder, unintentional murder, protective order, order for protection, harassment restraining order, domestic violence, victim protection, cross-jurisdictional orders, out-of-state restraining order, tribal court order, Canadian protective order, public safety, criminal law, homicide

Transcript Highlights:

• I have questions regarding the exemptions to the Open Meetings Act, which begins on line 352 and following
• exemption or not.
• Just pick any microphone. discussed would be exempt from the discussed would be exempt from the public
• <00:05:30.560> from patient, are we making them exempt from patient, are we making them exempt
• How does that work if they're exempt from the public record?

Keywords: Public Health and Welfare - Room 216, 17 February, 2026; 2:00 PM, 925, all

Summary: The committee met with a quorum and considered three House bills. House Bill 515, described as a measure allowing radiologist assistants to discuss preliminary findings with physicians after a test, was presented as identical to an earlier bill and passed on a title sufficient, do pass motion without debate. House Bill 1637 would create a fetal and infant mortality review panel under the Department of Health to align state law with federal requirements and mirror existing maternal mortality review work. The bill prompted extended questioning about broad exemptions from the Open Meetings and Public Records Acts, with Senator Blunt and others expressing concern that the language was too broad and could shield records beyond individual patient privacy. Dr. Edney of the Department of Health testified that the protections were needed so hospitals and providers would share sensitive information for performance improvement and mortality review work, and that final reports would still be issued. After the debate, Senator Blunt moved to lay House Bill 1637 on the table subject to call, and the motion passed. The committee then took up House Bill 814, which would raise fees for inspections and investigations of food establishments and wastewater systems; it was described as a Department of Health measure supported by the regulated entities because they want inspections. The bill was characterized as maintaining an arm’s-length relationship between regulators and regulated parties, and it passed on a title sufficient, do pass motion. The chair closed by noting the committee had completed its agenda and would not meet the next day.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:21:21.760> that proclamation, but the exemption that proclamation, but the exemption that
• So, you know, that's the concern I have, and so we're going to exempt—and I'm not against exempting my
• So, you know, that's the concern I have, and so we're going to exempt—and I'm not against exempting my
• <00:28:58.240> and have and so we're going to exempt and have and so we're going to exempt
• > my<00:29:00.880> homelands I'm not against exempting my homelands I'm not against exempting

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Joint Senate Committee on Education, Hawaiian Affairs, and Housing heard House Bill 1088 HD1, which would exempt housing developed by the Department of Hawaiian Homelands (DHHL) from school impact fees. The Department of Education said it was open to working with DHHL and the Legislature, including possibly eliminating the construction-cost portion of the fee for DHHL and other government affordable housing projects, but it wanted to retain the land-dedication requirement for future school sites where growth would exceed existing school capacity. The School Facilities Authority supported the bill, and DHHL strongly supported it, noting that its testimony referenced an earlier emergency proclamation but that the exemption remains in the current proclamation. DHHL also said it had no objection to a proposed amendment from the Wahiawa Hawaiian Homestead Association. The Tax Foundation of Hawaii testified in opposition to the broader school impact fee program, arguing that the fund has accumulated about $29 million that has not been spent and citing concerns raised in State Auditor Report 19-13, including administrative and constitutional issues. Committee discussion focused heavily on whether the fee system is being applied fairly, especially to smaller projects and homeowners, and whether the districts and calculations used to assess fees have been updated. Members questioned the DOE and SFA about the distinction between land and construction costs, the use of fees in areas like Kīhei, Kalihi, Ala Moana, and Ewa, and whether the department had revisited district calculations as recommended in the audit. DOE said it had collected about $500,000 in construction money and $2.8 million in land contributions for Kalihi-related areas, and said it would follow up on questions about land conveyances and district updates. After discussion, the chair called for a vote. The Education committee recommended passing HB 1088 HD1 as is, with Senator San Buenaventura voting with reservation and Senators Ihara and Kole voting aye. The recommendation was adopted. The Housing committee then also deferred the measure.

Transcript Highlights:

• Relationships HB 1864 by Verdell relating to the exemption from the use of tax imposed on certain motor
• qualify for those exemptions.
• HB 1932 by Lopez and Cameron relating to the exemption of adorum taxation for the residents' homestead
• AP 2303 by Bell of Montgomery relating to the electric markets, payments and an exemption sales from
• HB 2362 by Garcia Bay relating to the exemption from sales and use of taxes for educational materials

Transcript Highlights:

• The existing Act contains several exemptions; the update removes or modifies exemptions for applications
• This does not make any exemption to not light the American flag.
• of the Night Sky requirements, I don't see that exemption.
• I see exemptions for farming and many other things, but I don't see exemptions for that.
• And you're taking that out, and that exemption—you're also taking out the exemption for farms, ranches