Video & Transcript Research : 'litigation'
Page 76 of 207
NM
New Mexico 2026 Regular Session
House - Appropriations and Finance Jan 24th, 2026 at 09:09 am
House Appropriations & Finance
Transcript Highlights:
- It's been litigated. We won the lawsuit. The job of remediation... ...been litigated.
- I don't understand why we wouldn't continue to fund the litigation of the Rio Grande Compact.
- Chair and Representative, both line 7 and 8 are to the Attorney General for interstate water litigation
- So what you're saying is they have $8,561 for litigation expenses for this year? No, Mr.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Since 19, 2013, Texas has had a. statute requiring litigants to notify the attorney general if they were
- Well, I think it is because you'll be using my money to litigate it.
- have deep fake, all these other deep fake tools, and um, so again, I, I'm not, we're not here to litigate
- We will get that, but I wanna be really clear, we are not litigating AI in elections.
- I don't think that this is the appropriate place to litigate whether or not someone is a citizen.
Bills:
HB304
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- So if there's litigation and there's a question about whether emails are relevant, those are still relevant
- So I also note that this allows a special litigation committee automatically, whereas Delaware assesses
- special litigation committee independence after the fact.
- And it does appear that we are creating a very pro-management, litigant-resistant circumstance.
- If we're talking about litigation or claims or allegations against companies that they have breached
Summary:
The Senate convened with a quorum, heard an invocation, and adopted the previous day’s journal. Members then adopted Senate Resolution 358 honoring the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley on its 10th anniversary, with remarks highlighting UTRGV’s growth, degree production, research expansion, medical school, and role in serving the Rio Grande Valley and South Texas. The chamber also recognized the doctor of the day and adopted additional resolutions, including one for Denton County Days at the Capitol and another recognizing Texas HBCU Day.
The Senate gave extensive recognition to outgoing Texas A&M University System Chancellor John Sharp through Senate Resolution 368. Senators from both parties praised his long public career, leadership of the A&M System, support for regional universities, and bipartisan approach. The resolution was adopted after multiple members added their names. The chamber also heard from advocates with the Texas Streets Coalition, and received gubernatorial nominations for the State Board of Examiners of Professional Counselors and the Texas Commission on Fire Protection.
On legislation, the Senate passed several major bills. Committee Substitute Senate Bill 27, relating to rights and support for public school educators, was debated and amended to address teacher vacancies, bilingual certification testing, paid leave options, classroom removals, and appeal rights, then passed unanimously. Senate Joint Resolution 12, proposing a constitutional amendment on parents’ right to direct a child’s education, advanced on a 22-9 vote. Committee Substitute Senate Bill 1741, aimed at preventing foreign influence and intellectual property theft at public institutions of higher education, passed unanimously. Committee Substitute Senate Bill 29, the business entities bill, also passed after debate over corporate governance and shareholder protections. Senate Bill 857, authorizing law enforcement to tow certain vehicles driven by unlicensed or uninsured drivers, passed despite some concern about towing abuses during disasters. The Senate also took up Committee Substitute Senate Bill 1536 on dementia and Alzheimer’s training for certain guardians, but the transcript ends as that bill is being laid out.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Since 2013, Texas has had a statute requiring litigants to notify the Attorney General if they were challenging
- I think it is because you'll be using my money to litigate it.
- And so again, we're not here to litigate whether or not we should have these rules on AI. ...elections
- But I want to be really clear: we are not litigating AI in elections.
- I don't think that this is the appropriate place to litigate whether or not someone is a citizen.
Keywords:
voter ID, citizenship proof, provisional ballot, election security, Texas, voting rights, deep fakes, misleading videos, election integrity, criminal offense, digital misinformation, deep fake, political manipulation, misinformation, artificial media, political influence, artificially generated media, election influence, Texas Election Code, healthcare reform
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Science, Technology and Energy (02/03/2026)
Science, Technology and Energy
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, but it's meant to kind of alleviate that workload and potential litigation if it were to be kind
- Um, but it's meant to kind of alleviate that workload and potential litigation if it were to be kind
- Um, but it's meant to kind of alleviate that workload and potential litigation if it were to be kind
- We don't have an ability to reconcile them, which, you know, is going to lead to litigation.
- Now, I agree, you know, litigation.
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
Joint Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources Committee, June 12, 2026
Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources
Transcript Highlights:
- I did want to bring that up as a potential solution to some of these issues with liability and litigation
- 25:22.760>
with <02:25:23.080>liability <02:25:23.720>and <02:25:23.840>litigation - issues with liability and litigation. issues with liability and litigation.
- beginning to have the conversations about access to answers to problems rather than suggesting litigation
- and go through the cost of litigation.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Finance (03/31/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- We also know that the former SB 3 law that went into litigation cost our state $3 million to litigate
- We also know that the former SB 3 law that went into litigation cost our state $3 million to litigate
- We also know that the former SB 3 law that went into litigation cost our state $3 million to litigate
- We also know that the former SB 3 law that went into litigation cost our state $3 million to litigate
- This administration is passing, given the high rate of litigation that has been following.
Summary:
The Finance Committee met to review Division One of a very large budget package, with the chair explaining that the budget was being analyzed in three divisions over multiple days. Members first discussed procedure, including when amendments and line-item votes would be taken, and agreed to proceed with the division’s presentation before questions. Representative Maguire then outlined the division’s approach as a series of tradeoffs to close a large budget gap, emphasizing cuts, some revenue changes, and a focus on overall spending levels as well as individual reductions.
The presentation covered a wide range of agencies and policy areas. Major proposed changes included cuts or eliminations to several boards and commissions viewed as costly or duplicative, such as the Housing Appeals Board, Board of Tax and Land Appeals, Human Rights Commission, Commission on Aging, Office of the Child Advocate, and the Personnel Appeals Board, with some functions consolidated into other boards. The division also proposed back-of-the-budget cuts to the Information Technology Department, Judicial Branch, Justice Department, Retirement System, Corrections, and Environmental Services, along with fee increases in several areas. Other notable items included ending marketing for Paid Family Leave, reducing job advertising and tourism promotion, defunding the Arts Council, moving liquor enforcement functions out of the Liquor Commission, and shifting some funds such as the College Savings Commission money to Division Two.
Several members questioned specific cuts, especially the elimination of the Council on Aging, the reduction in regional planning commission grants, and the large cut to tourism advertising. Maguire defended the choices as necessary budget tradeoffs, arguing that some programs duplicated work done elsewhere, that regional planning grants were not among the most essential items, and that tourism promotion was a form of spending he viewed skeptically. He also explained that the public defender’s budget was partially restored after a credible claim of a governor’s budget error, and that the committee would continue refining corrections-related cuts because the House was only halfway through the budget process and further changes could still occur in the Senate and conference committee.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Child Committee Meeting - 2026-03-25
Children and Families Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- concerns that were raised about concerns that were raised about potential<00:36:47.400>
litigation - and<00:36:48.480>
the <00:36:48.560>length <00:36:48.840>of potential litigation - and the length of potential litigation and the length of the<00:36:49.000>
bill. - And lastly, it also addresses the litigation concerns that Chair West had brought up, that we talked
- lastly, it also addresses the litigation lastly, it also addresses the litigation concerns<00:37
Keywords:
youth intervention, grants, community support, early intervention services, nonprofit, Minnesota human services, forecast adjustment, budget forecast, appropriations, Medical Assistance, MinnesotaCare, Health Care Access Fund, general fund, behavioral health, housing support, General Assistance, Minnesota Supplemental Aid, MFIP, DWP, child care assistance
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Similar taxes in other states, primarily Maryland and Washington, are already being litigated, putting
- Similar taxes in other states, primarily Maryland and Washington, are already being litigated, putting
- Since its enactment in 2021, it has been mired in litigation related to the Internet Tax Freedom Act
- So I did want to address some of the points about litigation and administration, which I guess didn't
- intentionally to be robust and so that's not something that you need to worry about in terms of litigation
Keywords:
homeless prevention aid, homelessness, housing stability, rental assistance, family homelessness, unaccompanied youth, housing navigation, legal representation, family outreach, county aid, Tribal governments, local government aid, general fund appropriation, unspent funds, aid redistribution, sunset repeal, Minnesota property tax aid, services for persons experiencing homelessness, sales tax, use tax
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 3/4/26
Children and Families Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- So, as I understand it then, they could be opening themselves up for civil litigation, and I think, you
- for civil litigation for civil litigation um, um, um, and<01:30:26.520>
I <01:30:26.600>- The Fourth Amendment does not provide them the opportunity to have civil litigation against them.
- ><01:35:40.160>
to <01:35:40.240>have <01:35:40.560>civil <01:35:40.960>litigation - the opportunity to have civil litigation the opportunity to have civil litigation against<01:35:
Bills:
HF3415
Keywords:
child care, day care, licensed child care center, license-exempt child care, immigration enforcement, ICE, Customs and Border Protection, CBP, USCIS, Department of Homeland Security, DHS, judicial warrant, facility access, sensitive locations, immigrant families, Minnesota Statutes chapter 142B, 1183, house
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session-Day 13, February 24, 2026-AM
Wyoming House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- of action with monetary damages against districts is questionable and it dramatically increases litigation
- Just to clear up a few things from the other speakers, this won't increase any litigation unless your
- this won't increase any litigation this won't increase any litigation unless<01:36:36.239>
your - So I don't—while I understand the intent of the bringer, I think this opens up a lot of litigation that
- So I don't—while I understand the intent of the bringer, I think this opens up a lot of litigation that
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- these case types that I just described, and many others, it is going to involve an individual in litigation
- And when there's a resource imbalance in litigation, the underresourced party frequently has to either
- to involve an individual in litigation to involve an individual in litigation against<00:14:59.120
- ,<00:15:17.279>
the <00:15:17.519>underresourced <00:15:18.320>party litigation, - the underresourced party litigation, the underresourced party frequently<00:15:19.519>
has <00
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- members of the fiscal committee can appropriate general funds, as you know, like the Judicial Council litigation
- funds as you know like the judicial funds as you know like the judicial Council<00:41:18.000>
litigation - <00:41:19.079>
expenses Council litigation expenses Council litigation expenses Indigent<00 - would exceed what I would normally do, I think that there are some savings that we can do both in litigation
- and other things both in in litigation and other things that<02:20:41.760>
would <02:20:42.560
LA
Transcript Highlights:
- It does not open the floodgates of litigation.
- And it states, and I quote, litigating a due process complaint is an expensive affair, costing school
- Shepard said: the impact, the potential impact, to litigate or review the IEP... ...the delivery of services
- They're warning that is not a hypothetical; it is the litigation that should already be happening, and
LA
Transcript Highlights:
- It does not open the floodgates of litigation.
- And it states, and I quote, litigating a due process complaint is an expensive affair, costing school
- Shepard said: the impact, the potential impact, to litigate or review the IEP and the delivery of services
- They're warning that is not a hypothetical; it's the litigation that should already be happening, and
Summary:
The Senate Education Committee met to hear several education-related measures. It reported favorably, without objection, on House Bill 1215, which would transfer certain removed historical statues and monuments to the Office of State Parks, prohibit re-erection in the parish where they were removed, and require interpretive signage. The committee also advanced House Bill 682, which creates a school guardian program for honorably discharged veterans employed or contracted by local school systems or charter schools; testimony emphasized that guardians would be unarmed, trained, and used for mentoring and school safety. House Bill 1079, giving enrollment preferences in charter schools to children in early childhood programs, military families, foster children, and children in custody disputes, was also reported favorably, as was House Concurrent Resolution 81, directing the Department of Education to study options for districts facing declining enrollment.
The committee then took up House Bill 1084, which would allow public postsecondary institutions to raise tuition and mandatory fees by up to 15 percent annually, with higher increases requiring Board of Supervisors approval. The bill drew extended debate over affordability, TOPS, student retention, and whether universities should have more autonomy to set prices. Members raised concerns about fee burdens on families and whether the state should first study the issue; supporters argued the bill would increase transparency and let institutions respond to funding needs and market conditions. Senator Mazzell offered an amendment lowering the cap from 15 percent to 10 percent, and the committee adopted the amendment before reporting the bill favorably as amended.
Finally, the committee heard House Bill 342, which would shift the burden of proof in special education due process hearings from parents to local education agencies. The author and parents testified that the current system places an unfair burden on families of children with disabilities, who often lack access to records and legal resources, and that schools already control the documentation and should have to show compliance with IEP obligations. Jefferson Parish school officials opposed the bill, arguing it would increase legal costs, require more staff and attorney time, and potentially lead to more hearings; they also questioned the fiscal note. The Legislative Fiscal Office said the fiscal impact was indeterminable, and the committee continued hearing testimony from parents and school representatives as the transcript ended.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Labor, Public Employment and Retirement Committee Apr 22nd, 2026
Labor, Public Employment and Retirement
Transcript Highlights:
- There's, of course, also no litigation risk when you don't have to do CEQA.
- Of course, all this could eventually lead to litigation as well, but we don't want that, right?
- So some of the things right now, the barrier to entry for litigation is very, very low.
- systems in California would be faced with the impossible choice: breach contracts at the risk of litigation
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Labor, Public Employment and Retirement Committee Apr 22nd, 2026
Labor, Public Employment and Retirement
Transcript Highlights:
- There's, of course, also no litigation risk when you don't have to do CEQA.
- Of course, all this could eventually lead to litigation as well, but we don't want that, right?
- So some of the things right now, the barrier to entry for litigation is very, very low.
- systems in California would be faced with the impossible choice: breach contracts at the risk of litigation
Summary:
The committee heard SB 921, which would create a tax credit to help agricultural employers offset overtime premium costs for farmworkers. Senator Grove and supporters, including farmworkers, the California Farm Bureau, and agricultural groups, argued the bill would restore lost hours and take-home pay after California’s agricultural overtime law reduced schedules. Opponents, including the California Federation of Labor Unions and CRLA Foundation, argued the proposal would subsidize employers with taxpayer dollars and undermine the principle that employers should pay overtime themselves. The bill was held in subcommittee until more members arrived.
The committee then took up SB 1083, a cleanup bill to the prior year’s school employee misconduct database law. The author and supporters said it would add due process protections for classified school employees, require an administrative law judge review before placement in the database, and improve notice and vetting rules for contractors and non-permanent staff. School employer groups and other opponents warned the bill could slow investigations and weaken child-safety protections. The committee approved the bill 3-0 and sent it to Senate Appropriations.
Members also considered SB 1089, which would require CalPERS health plans to cover GLP-1 medications and expand access through CalRX for chronic weight management and related health conditions. The author and supporters, including the American Diabetes Association and medical groups, said the drugs can prevent diabetes and improve health outcomes but remain unaffordable for many. Pharma representatives expressed concerns about the bill as drafted but said they were open to continued discussions. The bill passed 4-0 to Appropriations. The committee also approved the consent calendar 4-0.
Later, the committee heard SB 954, which would narrow and add guardrails to last year’s CEQA exemption for advanced manufacturing, including environmental review near disadvantaged communities and labor standards such as prevailing wage and skilled-and-trained workforce requirements. Labor, environmental, and community groups supported the bill as a cleanup of an overly broad exemption, while business and manufacturing groups opposed it, warning it would discourage investment and worsen California’s competitiveness. The bill passed 3-1 to Appropriations. Finally, SB 1299, a fire sprinkler fitter certification bill, was heard and passed 3-0 to Appropriations with support from the sprinkler fitters and building trades and no recorded opposition.
AZ
Arizona 2026 Regular Session
03/23/2026 - Senate Federalism and Family Law
Federalism and Family Law
Transcript Highlights:
- But when you have pro se litigants going into all manner of family court and divorce proceedings, we
- I've tried to litigate in the Court of Appeals to get them to carve out and explain...
- I've tried to litigate in the Court of Appeals to get them to carve out an exception for domestic violence
- disclose trauma in legally perfect formats, and this bill ensures courts focus on child safety over litigation
Keywords:
child neglect, financial resources, behavioral health, Christian Science treatment, parental rights, child support, preborn children, retroactive support, medical expenses, child welfare, child care, grant program, low-income, early learning, infrastructure, economic growth, security freeze, credit reporting, dependent children, parental notification
AZ
Arizona 2026 Regular Session
02/18/2026 - Senate Health and Human Services
Health and Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- It will significantly mitigate litigation opportunities through structural design, and it will free AHCCCS
- It will significantly mitigate litigation opportunities through structural design, and it will free AHCCCS
- procurement method will undergo multiple rounds of procurement and undoubtedly spawn multiple years of litigation
- members across six states, including Arizona. of procurement and undoubtedly spawn multiple years of litigation
Bills:
SB1014, SB1094, SB1146, SB1177, SB1192, SB1194, SB1214, SB1372, SB1390, SB1398, SB1399, SB1494, SB1557, SB1561, SB1564, SB1602, SB1603, SB1621, SB1628, SB1629, SB1713, SB1752, SB1776, SB1813, SB1814, SB1821
Keywords:
gender transition, gender detransition, health insurance, medical procedures, insurance claims, official documents, Arizona law, gender reassignment, civil liability, minors, medical consent, detransition, dependent children, foster care, periodic review, court hearings, child welfare, public funds, prohibition, Arizona legislation
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Senate Standing Committee on Veterans, Military Affairs, & Public Protection (2-27-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- not being able to participate in this, and pointed out that there's some other states that are litigating
- <00:36:26.960>
are there's some other states that are there's some other states that are litigating - 36:28.160>
do <00:36:28.280>want <00:36:28.359>to <00:36:28.520>look litigating - this so I do want to look litigating this so I do want to look into<00:36:29.000>
that <00:36:
Summary:
The Senate VMAP Committee met with a quorum and heard three bills. Senate Bill 144, sponsored by Senator Danny Carroll, would require destruction of firearms used in homicides and allow destruction of certain defaced, hazardous, unsafe, or owner-requested firearms, while prohibiting agencies from intentionally damaging firearms before transfer and requiring written agency policies. Senator Tichenor asked about lost auction revenue; KSP said it could not track homicide weapons separately, that auctions bring in about $1.2 million annually, and that most proceeds support Kentucky Homeland Security. Senators Boswell and others said they generally oppose destroying firearms but supported moving the bill forward; the bill passed favorably with no nays.
House Bill 191, sponsored by Representative Aaron Thompson and presented with state and veterans’ officials, would align Kentucky law with federal changes to allow additional burials in state veteran cemeteries for certain National Guard and Reserve veterans, their spouses, and dependents who were not previously eligible. Testimony explained the bill would cover veterans who served in reserve components without Title 10 activation, including those who assisted during floods, fires, and tornadoes, and clarified eligibility rules for spouses and children. Senators asked about minimum service and dependent eligibility, and the committee passed the bill favorably and unanimously.
Senate Bill 198, sponsored by Senator David Yates, addressed protection of veterans’ benefits by regulating third-party claims consultants. The committee adopted a substitute adding definitions and accreditation-related provisions, and Yates said the bill was intended to curb abusive fee practices and direct penalties to the special license plate fund for veterans. He explained the bill’s fee limits, including a cap tied to three times the monthly increase in benefits and an overall ceiling, while senators questioned whether the cap might discourage good actors and how the dollar limits would work. A veteran witness, Bob Casher, supported the bill and urged more public information on free claims assistance; the committee held further action while allowing guest comments, and the discussion focused on balancing consumer protection with access to legitimate consultants.