Transcript Highlights:

• Is there any debate? Is there any debate?
• Is there any debate? If not, the clerk will call the roll. Is there any debate?
• Is there any debate?
• Is there any debate? Is there any debate?
• Is there any debate? If not, the clerk will call the roll. Is there any debate?

Keywords: House streaming session for Friday, April 10, 2026, 957, house, all

Summary: The House met with 122 members present, heard the journal read, and proceeded through a long series of Senate messages, concurrence motions, and third-reading votes on a wide range of bills. Early business included conference committee appointments on Senate Bill 159 (Emergency Medical Services Vehicles and Ambulances, Required Supplies), Senate Bill 514 (Third Degree Assault), and Senate Bill 866 (Chain Restaurants, disclosure of sodium and added sugars), along with several other bills where the House declined to recede from its amendments and named conferees. The chamber also adopted concurrence on House Bill 1181 (children in out-of-home placement) and House Bill 1219 (climate change/homeowners insurance study), and adopted a favorable committee report on House Bill 1602 (no-cost cancer screening for volunteer firefighters), which was amended to add sponsors, make technical changes, and include retired volunteer firefighters before being ordered printed for third reading. The House then took up a Rules Committee consent calendar and moved a batch of bills to the appropriate committees. On third reading, it passed House Bill 1028 (Caroline County Board of Education compensation increase) and House Bill 1599 (Choptank River Enhancement Program and Maryland Seafood Industry Financial Assistance Fund) by constitutional majorities. It also rejected Senate amendments on House Bill 107 (Intelligent Speed Assistance System Pilot Program), House Bill 153 (residential rental apartments air conditioning requirement), House Bill 1063 (hunting management), and House Bill 1067 (lead and lead-based ammunition phase out), appointing conference committees in each case. House Bill 717 (Baltimore City raffles for organizations affiliated with professional baseball and football teams) and House Bill 892 (cemeteries, actions for sale/transfer/alternate use) also had Senate amendments rejected. The chamber then passed a series of Senate bills on third reading, including Senate Bill 309 (precious metal bullion or coins sales tax exemption), 523 (vernal pools identification), 742 (Maryland Protecting People with Disabilities Act), 141 (election misinformation/disinformation and deep fakes), 298 (Maryland Capital Police statewide jurisdiction), 515 (Health Services Cost Review Commission rate setting), 638 (Maryland Heritage Areas funding and grants), 28 (state employee arbitration reform), 72 (Baltimore County off-premises alcohol sales), 361 (Baltimore City alcoholic beverages license extension), 414 (Anne Arundel County nonprofit swim club license), 601 (cybersecurity standards), 305 (incarcerated individual training and reentry grant fund extension), 331 (retired law enforcement handgun permit renewal), 516 (protective body armor requirements and reporting), 651 (transfer-on-death deed establishment), 865 (private passenger automobile insurance work group), 933 (temporary appointment to the Commission on Judicial Disabilities), 261 (money transmission act definition changes), and 823 (Parole Commission selection committee changes). Most passed with little or no debate; Senate Bill 523 drew opposition from a delegate who warned that identifying vernal pools could lead to future regulation and land-use restrictions, while Senate Bill 823 prompted questions about victims’ rights and whether state’s attorneys remained opposed, with the floor leader saying the bill added a victims’ rights advocate to the selection committee and that opposition had been limited to written testimony. Several members later changed votes on Senate Bill 638 and Senate Bill 865 before the House moved on.

Transcript Highlights:

• I did ask for debate. They said nobody wanted it. I did.
• She said magical debate there. She said ADUs, and it got my attention. I got excited. Sorry.
• Any further debate on the strike all amendment? No further debate on the strike all amendment?
• That is all for public debate and testimony. Great. We are back to our members.
• Members, we are on debate on this only bill in our committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• Is there any debate on? Are there any appearance forms for the bill? No appearance form?
• Is there any debate on the bill? Chair Pasadamo, you are recognized to close. We've closed.
• Is there any debate on the bill? Chair Pasadamo, you are recognized to close.
• Is there any debate on the bill? Chair Pasadena, you are recognized to close on the bill.
• Is there any debate? Seeing no debate, Senator Pasadomo, you are recognized to close on the bill.

Summary: The Senate Committee on Rules convened with a quorum present and brief housekeeping remarks, including the introduction of new Rules staff director Shasta Cruz. Chair Pasadomo outlined the committee’s plan to move through bills efficiently, and Vice Chair Jones presided over the bill agenda. No public appearance forms or testimony were offered on any of the measures. The committee considered three Senate bills related to Florida Statutes: SB 100, the Adoption Act, which prospectively adopts the 2026 Florida Statutes and the 2025 regular session’s statute materials; SB 102, which removes statutory provisions that have already been repealed or expired; and SB 104, the General Revisers’ Bill, which deletes obsolete language, updates cross-references, and corrects grammatical and typographical errors. Each bill was explained by Senator Pasadomo, received no questions or debate, and was reported favorably by roll call vote. After the votes, several senators requested to be recorded as voting favorably on tabs 1 and 2. Chair Pasadomo noted the meeting would be one of the session’s shortest and announced the committee would meet again on Thursday. Senator Martin moved to adjourn, and the committee adjourned without objection.

Transcript Highlights:

• Any debate? Okay. Okay. No other questions? Any debate? Did you have a question? Senator, no. Yes.
• Any other debate or questions? Any other debate or questions?
• Some debate. Sorry. Thanks so much, Chair.
• Seeing none, is there any debate on the proposed bill?
• Is there any debate on the proposed bill?

Summary: The Committee on Military Veterans Affairs, Space, and Domestic Security met to consider SB 96, which originally proposed a new veterans dental care program but was amended to expand the existing Veterans Dental Care Grant Program. The amendment raised eligibility from 300% to 400% of the federal poverty level and added a recurring $500,000 general revenue appropriation. Members discussed whether expanding eligibility without guaranteed additional funding could dilute services for veterans already being served, while supporters argued it would help veterans currently turned away for dental care. The committee adopted the amendment and then reported CS/SB 96 favorably by roll call vote, with Chair Wright voting no. The committee also approved two committee bills continuing public records exemptions: SPB 7000, covering the address and telephone number of people staying in public emergency shelters during storms or catastrophic events, and SPB 7002, covering certain Department of Military Affairs records stored in or transmitted through Department of Defense systems or related to military cyber operations. Both were moved as committee bills without objection and were favorably reported. Members then received presentations from Dr. Pia Woodley of the Florida Veterans Foundation and Joe Marino of Veterans Florida. Dr. Woodley outlined the foundation’s dental initiatives, emergency assistance, transportation support, benefits guide distribution, new programs for state veterans’ homes and community grants, and recent audits with no findings. Marino described Veterans Florida’s SkillBridge, entrepreneur, and workforce programs, including outreach and federal partnerships, and noted legislative priorities to allow stipends for training at UF IFAS AGVets facilities and to rename a program in statute for clarity. The meeting concluded with no further business and adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• Is there any debate on the bill?
• Any debate.
• Is there any debate on the bill? Senator Byrd? >> Thank you. Madam Chair.
• Additional debate. Senator Martin, you're recognized to close on the bill. >> Thank you, chair.
• We are in debate Senators reef in debate. >> I just want to say did chair Grall thank you for bringing

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Barragán, for 5 minutes. morning hour debate. The chair will morning hour debate.
• But in no event shall debate 5 minutes.
• I ask for purpose of debate only.
• Why are we having this debate?
• I think that's have that debate.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Are there any questions for discussion or debate?
• And you, any debate? Seeing none, please open the Is anyone going to change their vote?
• Is there any debate? At that point, please open the rules Zimba won't change the vote.
• Any debate? Seeing none, please just open the They choose to change their vote.
• And you got to pass in the second immediate debate. Sign of debate, please open the ros.

Bills: HB4274, HB3076, HB4358, HB3312, HB3288, HB3885

Keywords: HB4274, Oklahoma schools, interdistrict transfer, open transfer, school enrollment, military families, active duty, National Guard, Reserve orders, military installation, residency requirements, district of choice, public school transfer, student transfer, special education, IEP, Section 504, military housing, base housing, electronic enrollment

Transcript Highlights:

• . >> Chair McClure: WE ARE IN DEBATE, IS THERE ANY DEBATE, REPRESENTATIVE TANT. >> Rep.
• IT HAS BEEN GREAT TO SEE. >> Chair McClure: ADDITIONAL DEBATE, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED TO CLOSE. >> Rep.
• ALL RIGHT, NO AMENDMENTS, DEBATES, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED TO CLOSE, HAVING WAIVE CLOSE ALL IN FAVOR SAY YEA
• SOMETIMES WE STAY HOME BECAUSE YOU START AT 8 AM, JUST SAYING. >> Chair McClure: WE ARE IN DEBATE.
• AND OUR GROUP IS IN SUPPORT, WE ARE IN DEBATE, RECOGNIZED TO CLOSE ON YOUR GOOD BILL. >> Rep.

Transcript Highlights:

• IF NOT, IS THERE DEBATE ON THE AMENDMENT? ANY DEBATE? IF NOT, ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
• IS THERE DEBATE ON THE AMENDMENT? IF NOT, ALL IN FAVOR OF THE AMENDMENT SAY AYE.
• IS THERE DEBATE ON THE AMENDMENT? SENATOR GRALL, DO YOU WISH TO CLOSE. >> WAIVE CLOSE. >> Sen.
• IS THERE DEBATE ON THE AMENDMENT? SENATOR GRALL, DO YOU WISH TO CLOSE. >> Sen.
• DEBATE ON THE AMENDMENT IS THERE DEBATE ON THE AMENDMENT. >> WAIVE CLOSE BE ONCE ALL FAVORING THE AMENDMENT

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• or passion debate.
• appreciate the serious debate. appreciate the serious debate.
• know, it's interesting this debate. know, it's interesting this debate.
• That motion is in order, but it is debatable, and when we have a chance, I'd like to debate.
• Debate discussion on the motion. Debate discussion on the motion.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Because we believe this issue has been debated long enough, it is time for the Senate to do its job and
• Our residents spend the money, our neighboring states collect the revenue, but this debate has never
• The Senate should not fear debate. We should not fear democracy.
• And finding the framework unsuitable, they debated, drafted, and submitted to the states a proposal for
• And finding the framework unsuitable, they debated, drafted, and submitted to the states a proposal for

Summary: The Senate convened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, then received communications recalling it for voting session and referring gubernatorial nominations and a series of Senate and House bills and resolutions to standing committees. Leaves of absence were granted, and the chamber recessed briefly for committee meetings and party caucuses before reconvening. On the floor, the Senate unanimously agreed to House Bill 1102 and later passed Senate Bill 1133 and Senate Bill 1303 by 50-0 votes. Several measures were set aside to their proper place in the calendar or re-referred, including Senate Bill 1182 and House Bill 928 to Appropriations. The Senate also adopted multiple amendments to Senate Bill 1372, including a technical amendment from Senator Brooks, an amendment offered on behalf of Senator Loughlin, and Senator Fontana’s amendment requiring carbon monoxide detectors in child care facilities; after amendment, Senate Bill 1372 was held over. The chamber adopted Senate Resolution 326 urging a posthumous Medal of Honor for Major Richard Winters. During petitions and remonstrances, Senator Tartaglione urged action to raise Pennsylvania’s minimum wage, noting it has been 20 years since the last increase. Senator Dush honored Colonel James C. Harding on his birthday, highlighting his military service and decorations. Senator Street introduced a discharge resolution to force consideration of adult-use cannabis legalization, arguing the issue has bipartisan support and should receive a vote. Senator Dush also delivered extended remarks on the Founders, John Adams, religion, and the Constitution. Committee reports followed, including Appropriations reporting Senate Bills 1061, 1182, and 1303 as committed and House Bill 2400 as amended, and Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure reporting House Bill 2426 as committed. The Senate then considered supplemental calendars, adopting an amendment to Senate Bill 1182 and passing Senate Bill 1303 on final passage, both by 50-0 votes. The chamber was also notified of upcoming committee meetings, and it recessed until June 30, 2026, at 11 a.m., unless recalled sooner.

Transcript Highlights:

• But this debate has never been only about economics, although economics is an important component of
• The Senate should not fear debate. We should not fear democracy.
• colleagues to join us in moving Senate Bill 120 forward so that this chamber can finally have the debate
• The Senate should not fear debate. We should not fear democracy.
• And finding the framework unsuitable, they debated, drafted, and submitted to the states a proposal for

Keywords: Scheduler, 972, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It will be debated. So you know there will be debate. Lark wrote the machine. Close the queue.
• You're recognized for 10 minutes debating in favor of your measure.
• Speaker, want to thank the member, and I really should know because we've debated against each other
• me the opportunity to once again in my education debate correct misstatements.
• The bill will be debated. No debate. The question for the House shall be the pass.

Bills: SB378, SB985, SB1246, HB3720, SB1500, SB1984, HB4118, SB1644, SB1546, SB483

Keywords: bail bondsman, bondsman license, multicounty agent bondsman, surety bondsman, Insurance Commissioner, bail bond regulation, bond deposit, forfeiture, deposit ratio, writing capacity, license transfer, power of attorney, surety bond, bail industry, Oklahoma insurance law, financial solvency, administrative action, Oklahoma Local Food for Schools, school meals, local food procurement

Transcript Highlights:

• Any debate on the bill? This might be a record time.
• Is there debate on the amendment? Excuse me, we're on the bill. Is there any debate on the bill?
• Is there any debate on the bill? Excuse me, we're on the bill. We're on the bill.
• Is there any debate on the bill? Senator Rouson.
• Additional debate on the bill as amended.

Summary: The Senate Committee on Agriculture received a presentation from Florida Forest Service Director Rick Dolan on the agency’s wildfire response, forest management, and emergency support roles. He described the service’s four regions and 14 districts, its year-round wildfire response, use of bulldozers, helicopters, and drones, and the current high fire danger due to drought conditions. Dolan also highlighted prescribed burning, fuels mitigation, state forest management, the pine seedling nursery, and the agency’s role in hurricane response and incident management. Members asked about equipment loans and whether more prescribed burning could reduce wildfire impacts; Dolan said Florida already leads the nation in prescribed fire and emphasized public education and fuels reduction. The committee then considered and unanimously reported favorably Senate Bill 386, which creates a farm-equipment consumer protection process similar to a lemon law, allowing purchasers to seek repair or replacement of defective major farm equipment at no cost. The committee also took up Senate Bill 290, the Agriculture and Consumer Services omnibus bill. The bill would modernize fair association rules, preempt local bans on gas- and diesel-powered farm and landscape equipment, allow surplus of certain state-owned lands for bona fide agricultural use while excluding parks, forests, and wildlife lands, create a veterinary loan repayment program, make Farmers Feeding Florida permanent, expand Forest Service training opportunities, criminalize signal-jamming devices, increase penalties for CDL and English-proficiency exam cheating, restrict certain door-to-door solicitation, protect food safety inspectors, clarify biosolids rules, and add criminal and vendor-list penalties for contractors who fail to pay subcontractors. The committee adopted three amendments to align dates and technical language and to authorize native seed research and marketing through the Florida Wildlife Foundation. Testimony on SB 290 included support from several industry groups, concerns from the Home Builders Association about the new contractor-payment criminal penalties, and opposition from a citizen worried about the new surplus-land process for conservation lands. Despite concerns, CS/SB 290 was reported favorably. Finally, the committee unanimously recommended confirmation of the appointees listed on tabs 4 and 5, and then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, we are in debate on the bill. Representative Steele, you are recognized.
• Any other members wishing to debate on the bill?
• Representative McFarland, you are recognized in debate. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
• Any other members wishing to debate? Seeing none, Representative G.
• Any other members wishing to debate? Seeing none, Representative G.

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 1183, by Rep. G. Lombardo, as amended by a strike-all. The bill would provide liability protection for local governments and private-sector entities that substantially comply with certain cybersecurity practices, including multi-factor authentication, disaster recovery plans, and related policies and procedures. Rep. Lombardo said the measure is intended to create incentives for better cybersecurity and to limit class-action exposure after incidents, while still allowing suits where negligence can be shown. Supporters included TechNet, the Florida Justice Reform Institute, the Florida League of Cities, Associated Industries of Florida, the Florida Association of Counties, and Dr. Edward Long of the James Madison Institute; Vice Chair Steele, Rep. Blanco, and Rep. McFarland also spoke in favor. Ranking Member Bracy Davis opposed the bill, saying she was not comfortable granting liability protections to entities that may have contributed to breaches and questioning whether substantial compliance would be self-attested. The amendment was adopted, and the bill was reported favorably by a 14-2 vote. After the vote, the committee shifted into an extended discussion about Florida’s state IT governance structure, procurement, and project management. Members criticized the current federated model as fragmented and lacking clear accountability, with repeated references to long-running problems such as cost overruns, weak vendor oversight, workforce shortages, and the troubled I-Connect system. Several members argued that the state needs a single accountable leader or stronger enterprise authority over agency technology decisions. Ranking Member Bracy Davis raised concerns about the impact of broken systems on vulnerable populations and asked about the role of advisory councils. Rep. G. Lombardo, Vice Chair Steele, Rep. Miller, and Rep. Groh all emphasized the need for centralized leadership, better alignment of authority and budget, and more disciplined procurement and integration practices. A public witness, Victoria Zep of Team 180, testified in support of a more enterprise-wide approach and said the private sector also wants more organization and transparency. She criticized short procurement timelines, limited competition, and poorly written scopes, and urged the state to post procurements more openly and seek broader vendor input. She also discussed the need to respect agency-specific federal requirements while still improving statewide coordination. The chair closed by asking members to bring forward ideas for immediate and long-term reforms, including review of Senate Bill 7026, and the meeting adjourned without further business.

Transcript Highlights:

• And I would not want us to walk away from this debate and think that our work here is done or that we
• I look forward to us debating some of its specifics, but I also want to point out, once again, A, that
• I look forward to the debate, and I appreciate my good friend's answers, and I appreciate his engagement
• President, that during the debate, a gentleman from Foxborough, a gentleman from Fitchburg, a gentleman
• So we should have that kind of a debate. We should have those kinds of disclosures.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Senate took up Senate House No. 4010, a fiscal year 2025 supplemental appropriations bill funded largely by surplus Fair Share revenues. The Ways and Means chair described the bill as a $1.28 billion package, with major investments in education and transportation, including special education circuit breaker aid, higher education deferred maintenance, career technical education capital grants, school construction relief, high-dosage tutoring, English language learning grants, MBTA reserve replenishment and safety training, commuter rail maintenance, Chapter 90 local road aid, regional transit authority support, ferry and micro-transit funding, and a small World Cup transportation appropriation. Members from both parties generally praised the bill’s one-time, regionally balanced approach while emphasizing fiscal discipline and the limited, surplus-based funding source. The minority leader and others questioned the fund balances and the use of the education and transportation innovation and capital fund, the Student Opportunity Act trust fund, and the transitional escrow account; the chair said the bill would zero out the innovation and capital fund, leave about $430 million in the SOA trust, and about $200 million in the escrow account. Several members highlighted specific priorities. Senator Cronin and Senator Feeney strongly supported the $100 million career technical education investment, arguing it would expand vocational opportunities in comprehensive high schools and help meet workforce needs. Senator Feeney also emphasized MBTA funding, special education, local road repairs, English language learning tied to workforce needs, and World Cup preparations in Foxborough. Senator Comerford praised the bill’s regional equity, higher education maintenance funding, special education support, and transportation investments, while also noting the need for broader future work on Chapter 70 and school finance. Senator Tarr supported the bill but repeatedly stressed that the spending was a unique one-time opportunity and that the Commonwealth should preserve fiscal reserves and continue to address school funding inequities and MBTA finances more broadly. The chamber then considered numerous amendments. Amendment 1 on tariff pricing transparency was withdrawn after brief remarks, and Amendment 14, proposing a DESE study on educational outcomes for young men and boys, was rejected. Amendment 182, funding Worcester Regional Transit Authority capital expenses, was adopted. Amendment 228, adding $500,000 for Free Period to expand access to menstrual products in schools, was adopted. Amendment 257, funding Springfield Public Schools communication and safety systems, was also adopted. Other amendments, including Tarr amendments on supplemental district aid, MBTA reporting, and the Foundation Budget Review Commission, were rejected. Amendment 308 concerning MBTA Communities and Milton was withdrawn, after which Senator Driscoll began a presentation arguing Milton was being misclassified under the MBTA Communities Act and should be treated fairly under the law.

Transcript Highlights:

• Suspension of the rules is not debatable. The clerk will open the roll. Mr.
• Now, these are not abstract debates.
• Members, this motion is not debatable. It takes a majority of those present and voting.
• Members, this motion is not debatable. It takes a majority of those present and voting.
• Seeing and hearing no further debate, Assembly Member Gabriel, do you wish to close?

Summary: The Assembly convened, initially lacked a quorum, and then completed the roll call, prayer, and pledge. Members observed a moment of silence for the fatal B-52 crash at Edwards Air Force Base in Assemblymember Lackey’s district. The body then handled a series of procedural motions, including re-referrals of numerous Senate bills to different committees, suspending rules for committee notices, and taking up the budget bill, AB 109, without reference to file for concurrence in Senate amendments. Debate on AB 109, the 2026 budget act, centered on competing views of the state’s fiscal condition and policy priorities. Supporters said the budget balances the current and next year’s budget, reduces the structural deficit, builds reserves, protects health care, schools, housing, food assistance, and other safety-net programs, and responds to federal cuts under H.R. 1. Opponents argued the budget increases taxes and costs, shortchanges schools, underfunds Proposition 36, relies on gimmicks, and does not adequately address public safety, cost of living, or long-term sustainability. Several members also highlighted specific provisions such as hospital support, Medi-Cal and IHSS protections, child care, immigrant legal services, prison closure, and funding for courts and victim services. A motion by Assemblymember DeMaio to return AB 109 to the Senate failed on a roll call vote, 13 ayes to 45 noes. The Assembly then voted on concurrence in the Senate amendments to AB 109; the measure passed, and the Senate amendments were concurred in without objection, with immediate transmittal to the Governor. Afterward, the Assembly moved to the daily file and took up SCR 89, a resolution affirming diversity, equity, and inclusion. Supporters from several caucuses framed DEI as a core California value and a response to federal attacks, while opponents criticized DEI as divisive. The transcript ends during debate on SCR 89, before any final vote is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• Speaker, and I will make sure that there's an opportunity to debate this bill.
• Thank you, members, for that wonderful debate. It has definitely been robust.
• Paragraph 1 states to avoid debate on personalities, but speaking to the substance of the debate, there
• That we'll have as much debate on.
• We've had some robust debate, and I'm very thankful for the opportunity.

Transcript Highlights:

• Is there debate on the bill? Seeing no debate, Representative Greco, you are recognized to close.
• Seeing no questions, is there a debate on the bill?
• Seeing no debate, Representative Conerly, you are recognized to close. Just very quickly...
• We are in debate on the bill.
• Seeing no debate, Representative Rosenwald, you are recognized to close. Wave closed, sir.

Summary: The Health Care Budget Subcommittee met to hear three member bills before turning to budget discussion. First, the committee considered HB 1295 on memory care, which would set baseline operating standards for memory care providers and facilities, clarify resident contract requirements, and restrict facilities from advertising themselves as memory care providers unless they meet the bill’s criteria. AARP, the Alzheimer’s Association, and the Florida Senior Living Association supported the measure, and it was reported favorably with no debate. The committee then heard HB 1235, which would authorize Florida to join the Respiratory Care Interstate Compact. Representative Conerly and a representative of the Florida Society for Respiratory Care said the compact would improve workforce flexibility and patient access while preserving state oversight and using licensure fees rather than taxpayer dollars. The bill received favorable testimony and was reported favorably. Next, HB 933 was presented by Representative Rosenwald to add two new children’s initiative sites, one in Bay County and one in Broward County, expanding a program that coordinates education, health care, employment, and housing supports for children in disadvantaged communities. The bill had support from Florida Children’s Initiative and was also reported favorably. After the bill presentations, members were told the agenda would move to budget discussion, and the chair noted that budget recommendations had been submitted to Chair McClure. With no further business, Representative Redondo moved to recess.

Transcript Highlights:

• THAT IS IT FOR APPEARANCE FORMS, ANY DEBATE ON THE BILL?
• ANY DEBATE ON THE AMENDMENT, SENATOR COLLINS YOU ARE RECOGNIZED TO CLOSE ON THIS AMENDMENT. >> Vice Chair
• ANY DEBATE? THIS IS AN EASY CROWD, ISN'T IT?
• ANY DEBATE ON THE BILL? YES, SENATOR SHARIEF. >> Sen.
• I GUESS NO OTHER DEBATES, SENATOR COLLINS YOU ARE RECOGNIZED TO CLOSE ON YOUR BILL. >> Vice Chair Collins

Keywords: 999, senate, all