Transcript Highlights:

• He's a certified peer support worker and a certified family peer support worker.
• And our staff are certified peer support workers. We also have family peer support workers.
• They don't have to wait long to connect with a peer support worker or a family peer support worker.
• health supports. focus on behavioral health supports, which is work that they've been leading over the
• , and behavioral health.

Transcript Highlights:

• behavioral health.
• They need extra support.
• Enforcement to help support. So could we enhance that?
• Well, there's a funny thing about behavioral health.
• And they're also providing behavioral health services.

Summary: The Health Care Budget Subcommittee held a panel discussion on Florida’s mental health and substance abuse system, with representatives from DCF, AHCA, two managing entities, and two providers describing how the state’s behavioral health network is funded and operated. Members focused on the implementation of prior legislative investments, especially the $50 million in recurring funding from Representative Maney’s bill and the earlier $126 million community behavioral health appropriation. Witnesses said the newer funds were used mainly for crisis beds, discharge planning, outpatient services, regional collaboratives, and a USF Marchman Act report, while the larger behavioral health appropriation supported CAT, FACT, FIT, forensic teams, residential and outpatient services, and crisis care, with most dollars going directly to services and only a small share to administration. A major theme was access to crisis care and the role of mobile response teams, 988, and central receiving facilities in diverting people from Baker Act admissions and reducing readmissions. DCF and providers said mobile response teams have expanded, are being used to de-escalate crises and connect people to care, and have shown strong diversion results and reductions in Baker Acts in some regions. Members also asked about waitlists, children in crisis, and how to handle people without housing or support; providers said discharge planning is individualized but often constrained by homelessness, transportation, and a lack of safe placements, and several witnesses identified housing as one of the biggest barriers to recovery and stability. The committee also examined provider sustainability, reimbursement, and funding gaps. Witnesses described delays caused by contract timing, cost allocation rules, and Medicaid reimbursement rates that do not always keep pace with labor and operating costs, especially for smaller providers and rural networks. DCF and AHCA said managing entities can provide advances, retroactive rate adjustments, and technical assistance, and that Medicaid managed care plans have network standards and complaint/dispute processes. Members raised concerns about a reported $7 million loss in federal non-sustainable funds, provider closures, and whether there is a formal ombudsman process for disputes; DCF said the federal reductions were known and tied to one-time funds, and that the department generally handles provider issues informally while working with managing entities to preserve continuity of care.

Transcript Highlights:

• The request is to retain 15 of those 51 FTP to support the behavioral health continuum for children,
• increases in behavioral health services through the Idaho Behavioral Health Plan.
• This is related to the Idaho Behavioral Health Plan.
• Behavioral health services are important.
• And so this request is to maintain behavioral health funding or non-Medicaid behavioral health funding

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The Senate Finance and House Appropriations committee met with a quorum present and began with questions about a Rural Health Funding Task Force. Members asked who created it, what notice was given, whether it was replacing JFAC, and whether it was separate from the governor’s task force. The chair said it was created by legislative leadership rather than this committee, that JFAC would still control funding decisions, and that the task force was intended to provide structure and policy direction if the funding moves forward. The committee then received a General Fund Daily Update from Legislative Services analyst Christopher LaHosette, who noted updated revenue projections, three introduced House bills with general fund fiscal impacts, and the green sheet’s totalizing function for tracking legislation. The main presentation was from the Department of Health and Welfare on the Division of Welfare, Mental Health Services, and Psychiatric Hospitalization budgets. Alex Williamson reviewed the divisions’ roles, staffing, and five-year spending trends, and outlined the governor’s recommendations, including Medicaid eligibility system changes tied to federal law, SNAP administrative cost shifts to the state, Medicaid expansion work requirements, restoration of transfer authority, and behavioral health requests tied to the Jeff D. settlement and Idaho Behavioral Health Plan. Director Juliet Sharon said the department’s requests were largely maintenance, restoration, or compliance items, including system changes for twice-yearly Medicaid redeterminations and work requirements. Members asked about the impact of federal changes, the $5 million increase in welfare operations, vacancy levels, endowment funds, and whether the department could compare SNAP administrative costs to other states. Several questions focused on mental health cuts, the former Center of Excellence, the request to combine adult and children’s mental health budgets, and the effect of reductions on crisis services, ACT services, and mobile crisis units. Sharon and Behavioral Health Administrator Ross Edmonds said the department was trying to preserve crisis and hospital services, maintain separate tracking for children and adults, and monitor access closely while complying with legal and federal requirements. The committee also discussed Magellan’s contract, audit findings, and managed care oversight. Sharon said Magellan is reviewed through monthly, quarterly, and annual deliverables and can be placed on corrective action plans; she also said the department has processes to prevent payments for deceased or ineligible individuals. Members asked about duplication of services, the use of endowment funds at state hospitals, the need for more behavioral health workforce data, and whether the department could share equipment or contract out maintenance at the psychiatric hospitals. No votes were taken, and the committee adjourned after indicating it would meet again Monday morning.

Transcript Highlights:

• One is in support of the Behavioral Health Reform and Investment Act.
• this ongoing initiative for behavioral health reform.
• I'm on slide two, and this slide has the pictures of our behavioral health gross receipts tax and behavioral
• If you go to the next slide, titled '2024 Behavioral Health Strategic Plan,' you'll see a behavioral
• The behavioral health services division at the State and CEO of the Behavioral Health Collaborative.

Transcript Highlights:

• In conclusion, we support a pilot program for nursing facilities to care for behaviorally complex individuals
• support.
• We support over 400 skilled and assisted living facilities and manage nine current behavioral add-on
• We generally support increased funding across the behavioral health continuum.
• We generally support increased funding across the behavioral health continuum.

Bills: SB1, SB 1

Keywords: appropriations, budget, state funding, education, healthcare, infrastructure, campground safety, youth camp regulations, flood safety, emergency evacuation, health and safety standards, 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And using positive behavioral supports, the interprofessional care team can identify triggers and modify
• This conclusion is supported by official research conducted by the Association for Behavior Analysis
• But there is hope because positive behavioral supports work.
• Decades of research demonstrate that positive behavioral support, when individualized and consistently
• Research-based positive behavioral supports are a proven effective approach, even for individuals with

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee held a hybrid hearing on a range of bills affecting children, families, disability rights, homelessness, and social services. Early testimony focused on H.215, which would support children experiencing homelessness by speeding access to child care vouchers and early intervention screenings. Boston officials, Horizons for Homeless Children, Head Start, pediatric and early education advocates, and families described delays in child care and early intervention, the developmental risks of homelessness, and the need for automatic referrals and faster access to services. Testimony also supported H.216, which would improve emergency housing assistance by restoring presumptive eligibility, reducing documentation barriers, extending shelter stays from six to nine months, and creating an ombudsperson; providers and legal advocates said current rules leave families sleeping in cars or outside and create unnecessary administrative hurdles. The committee also heard strong support for H.210, which would repeal the “Learn Fair” school attendance sanction that cuts cash assistance to families when children miss school. Advocates from legal aid, education, and anti-poverty organizations argued the policy is punitive, burdensome, and ineffective, disproportionately affecting low-income, disabled, and Hispanic/Latino families. Several speakers said chronic absenteeism should be addressed through supports such as family outreach, wraparound services, and school engagement rather than benefit cuts. Legislators and school officials from Salem also testified that their districts reduced absenteeism through supportive strategies, not sanctions. Additional testimony addressed children’s vision bills H.202 and H.166, with optometrists and researchers urging better screening, data systems, and treatment access to close achievement gaps caused by untreated vision problems. Senator Lovely also presented S.2714, proposing a study of discrimination in public accommodations for people with service animals. Later, testimony on H.279 supported changing social work licensure rules to remove exam requirements that speakers said disproportionately exclude multilingual candidates and candidates of color. The hearing also included testimony on bills related to the Judge Rotenberg Center and electric shock devices, with disability rights advocates opposing continued use of the devices and urging the committee to reject licensing or authorization for them. No votes or committee actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, again, a lot of different behavioral health initiatives and family support initiatives with **Senate
• They are kids engaged in lower-level behavior.
• Behaviors are addressed by CYFD informally.
• Opportunities that schools provide around behavioral health supports. Yes. Thank you, Madam Chair.
• At behavioral health clinics, there are no copays for behavioral health services because, I mean, the

Transcript Highlights:

• On the behavioral health side, we're also about two years into the behavioral health roadmap, where we've
• That is why we must prioritize investments in supportive housing to ensure that individuals with behavioral
• The campaign seeks to ensure that kids and families have access to the behavioral supports that they
• The campaign seeks to ensure that kids and families have access to the behavioral supports that they
• direct support to our school districts that they can better support kids and ensuring that there are

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Public Health held an introductory informational hearing for the new session, with Chairs Marjorie Decker and Senator Michael Driscoll outlining the committee’s scope and emphasizing the impact of the federal landscape on Massachusetts public health. They noted the hearing would focus on testimony from agencies and advocates, with short testimony limits due to the hybrid format. No votes were taken; the meeting was for briefing and discussion of priorities. Commissioner Robbie Goldstein of the Department of Public Health described the department’s budget and federal funding, warning that recent CDC grant terminations could cut nearly $100 million and affect lab testing, surveillance, vaccines, and community engagement. He highlighted DPH priorities including racial equity, maternal health, substance use and child welfare coordination, emergency preparedness, data transparency, and public hospital quality. MassHealth Assistant Secretary Michael Levine discussed MassHealth’s role covering about 2 million residents and its priorities in health equity, behavioral health, primary care, member independence, and customer service, while noting the agency relies heavily on federal Medicaid dollars and would face major strain from federal cuts. Several advocacy and provider groups focused on reproductive health and maternal health. Planned Parenthood warned of threats to Title X, 340B savings, and other federal funding, and supported a bill to eliminate parental consent and judicial bypass for abortion care for young people. Reproductive Equity Now urged stronger shield-law protections and changes to Massachusetts’ later-abortion framework. Dr. Indyamaka Anugaka called for full implementation of the maternal health law, better reimbursement for doulas and midwives, stronger data collection, and support for full-spectrum pregnancy care coverage. The Health Policy Commission said new maternal health and primary care task forces would begin work soon. Mental health and health system access were also major themes. The Mass Medical Society urged action on vaccine hesitancy, removal of non-medical school vaccine exemptions, and primary care reform. The Massachusetts Association for Mental Health and the Children’s Mental Health Campaign opposed proposed cuts to DMH and substance use services, called for more school-based supports, and raised concerns about inpatient capacity, including a unit serving LGBTQ youth. The Massachusetts Nurses Association and 1199 SEIU warned that staffing shortages, low wages, workplace violence, hospital closures, and possible Medicaid cuts threaten patient care and the health care workforce. The Betsy Lehman Center also urged investment in automated patient-safety monitoring to reduce harm and costs.

Transcript Highlights:

• And then finally is support groups.
• It doesn't matter what type of support unit this was, if it was an elementary or a secondary support
• An elementary or a secondary support unit within a district, a support unit amount is the same.
• unit will generate more support units per student than a general support unit formula does.
• Statewide, on average, an exceptional education support unit generates about 40% more support units per

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from February 2 and 3. It then introduced RS 3-1308, sponsored by Representative Raymond, which would change public school digital content and curriculum funding from a first-come, first-served process to an as-needed, scored application process so districts with greater need would receive funds. The motion to introduce passed without opposition. The committee next heard a presentation from the Office of Performance Evaluations on its K-12 district characteristics and funding study. Casey Petty explained that Idaho’s support unit funding model tends to provide more state funding per student to smaller districts and less per student to larger districts, but that funding does not consistently rise with higher proportions of high-need students such as special education or English learner populations. He said Idaho’s special education formula assumes only about 5.8% of students are in special education, while actual enrollment was about 11.5% in 2023, contributing to an estimated $37.7 million gap in support-unit funding for special education. Members asked about the support unit model, district size effects, charter school data limitations, Medicaid, and whether the formula should be revised. The committee then considered House Joint Memorial 11, which urges Congress to fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act at the promised 40% level. Representative Furman and several educators and administrators testified in support, describing the strain on district budgets and citing large local shortfalls in Boise and Fruitland. Witnesses said districts are covering mandated special education services with local and state funds, and that increased identification, early intervention, and behavioral needs are driving costs. Some members raised questions about over-identification, eligibility criteria, and behavioral issues, but the memorial was ultimately sent to the floor with a due pass recommendation by voice vote. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill, which happens to be supported by the Association of Behavioral Health, recognizes the vital
• behavior.
• Specifically, I support Chair Friedman's S-867 bill, which supports community health centers and behavioral
• Also, mental health centers are a support system for behavioral health services for uninsured people,
• I'm president and CEO of Clinical and Support Options, a behavioral health agency serving Western and

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Health Care Financing held a public hearing on a large docket focused on primary care, workforce development, and medical debt. Chairs Cindy Friedman and John Lawn outlined hearing procedures and noted that testimony would be taken on 17 matters. The committee first heard testimony on bills to establish a community health center nurse practitioner residency program and to strengthen mental health centers. Senator Keenan, Rep. Keefe, and health center leaders described the Worcester nurse practitioner residency as a successful pipeline and retention strategy, citing workforce shortages, training needs in community health centers, and the cost of the program. Rep. O’Day also supported the mental health centers bill, saying it would raise payment rates, improve reimbursement for behavioral health services, and help clinics retain staff and expand access. The committee then took testimony on bills to address medical debt through hospital financial assistance reform. The Attorney General’s Office, Health Care for All, Health Law Advocates, the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, and individual patients supported the measure, arguing that hospital financial assistance policies are inconsistent, hard to find, and difficult to navigate. Witnesses said the bill would standardize eligibility criteria, create a uniform application, improve notice requirements, and expand access to discounted care up to 400% of the federal poverty level. Several personal stories described medical bills being sent to collections, confusion over insurance billing, and the burden of debt on low-income and chronically ill patients. Committee members asked about hospital concerns, the role of the health safety net, and whether the bill addressed root causes of medical debt; testimony emphasized that the proposal was meant to improve transparency and access rather than replace broader insurance reforms. The hearing also focused heavily on “Primary Care for You” legislation, H. 1370 and S. 867, which would increase primary care investment and create a new payment model. Rep. Haggerty, physicians, a patient, community health center leaders, and the Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers described a primary care crisis marked by low reimbursement, staffing shortages, long waits, burnout, and difficulty recruiting clinicians. Supporters said the bills would shift spending toward preventive, team-based care, improve access and equity, and reduce long-term costs. The Massachusetts Association of Health Plans said it was directionally supportive of increased primary care investment but warned that any new spending must stay within the cost growth benchmark and preserve existing contracting structures. The hearing ended with additional testimony on a community health center workforce and loan repayment grant bill from Rep. Stanley, and with further discussion from Dr. Alan Garo about the need for payment reform in primary care.

Transcript Highlights:

• And then finally is support groups.
• And on the left is support group one, which is support group four, which is the smallest districts.
• It doesn't matter what type of support unit this was, if it was an elementary or a secondary support
• unit will generate more support units per student than a general support unit formula does.
• Statewide, on average, an exceptional education support unit generates about 40% more support units per

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from February 2 and 3, then introduced RS 3-1308, a proposal from Rep. Raymond to change public school digital content and curriculum funding from a first-come, first-served system to an as-needed, scored application process so districts with greater need would receive priority. The motion to introduce the RS passed without opposition. The committee then heard a presentation from Casey Petty of the Office of Performance Evaluations on the K-12 districts characteristics and funding study. He explained Idaho’s support unit funding model, contrasted it with per-student funding used in other states, and said district size is the main driver of state funding per student. He also said small districts tend to serve proportionally more special education students, while larger districts serve more high-need students overall. Petty highlighted that Idaho’s special education funding formula relies on assumed percentages rather than actual counts, resulting in fewer support units than if all special education students were counted, and said many districts spend more on special education than they receive from the state. Members asked about the support unit model, district size effects, charter school data, Medicaid, and whether the formula should be revised. The committee then took up H.J.M. 11, sponsored by Rep. Furman, urging Congress to fully fund IDEA at the promised 40 percent of excess special education costs. Testimony in support came from Boise special education director China Herosaki, Caldwell educator Julie Mead, virtual teacher Kevin Field, and Fruitland Superintendent Stoney Winston, all of whom described rising special education needs and local districts covering large funding gaps with general funds. Members asked about rising autism and behavior-related needs, eligibility and evaluation practices, and how districts manage costs and services. The committee moved H.J.M. 11 to the floor with a due pass recommendation, with one member noting concern that federal lawmakers might respond by reducing IDEA obligations rather than increasing funding.

Transcript Highlights:

• Hi, Rachel Blucher on behalf of the California Association for Behavior Analysis in support.
• specialists supports three programs within the county's behavioral health system.
• specialists supports three programs within the county's behavioral health system.
• George Cruz on behalf of the California Behavioral Health Association in support. Thank you.
• George Hughes, on behalf of the California Behavioral Health Association, in support.

Summary: The Senate Committee on Health met in Room 2100 and first handled its consent calendar, which included several bills and resolutions with amendments. The committee established a quorum, approved the consent calendar 6-0, and placed it on call. AB 2233 by Assemblymember Taw was then heard; the bill would clarify that authorized ABA therapy for autistic patients should remain usable across the authorization period rather than being effectively reduced by weekly utilization caps. Supporters, including behavior analysts, family advocates, and health organizations, described missed sessions caused by provider shortages, scheduling conflicts, and family disruptions. Health plans and insurers initially expressed fraud and utilization-management concerns but said they would remove opposition after the amendments preserved utilization management. The committee voted 7-0 to pass AB 2233 as amended and re-refer it to Appropriations, placing it on call. The committee next heard AB 96 by Assemblymember Jackson, which would remove the high school diploma or equivalent requirement for Medi-Cal peer support specialist certification. Supporters from county behavioral health agencies, nonprofits, and local governments argued that lived experience, communication, empathy, and cultural competency are the key qualifications for peer work, and that the current education requirement excludes capable candidates and worsens workforce shortages. One opposition witness from the California Consortium of Addiction Programs and Professionals raised concerns, but the bill’s proponents explained that peer certification still requires 80 hours of training, testing, and recertification on core competencies. The committee voted 7-0 to pass AB 96 and re-refer it to Appropriations, placing it on call. AB 1876, the Fair Care for All Act by Assemblymember Addis, was then heard. The bill would codify federal nondiscrimination protections into state law to ensure people are not excluded from health care coverage or services based on a protected class. Support came from transgender health advocates, psychologists, county and state health groups, and other organizations, who said the bill would help protect access to gender-affirming and other medically necessary care. Opposition testimony argued the bill would force coverage of sex-rejecting interventions and weaken insurer safeguards, while the author responded that the measure simply mirrors existing federal nondiscrimination law and does not expand coverage. The committee voted 7-1 to pass AB 1876 and re-refer it to Judiciary, placing it on call. After the roll was reopened for absent members, the committee also finalized votes on the earlier bills and adjourned after concluding its business.

Transcript Highlights:

• The first is student behavior.
• And soon, Boise State is hosting a symposium on behavior supports for all Region 3 educators, and you
• I know that classroom behavior is difficult oftentimes, and sometimes the teachers don't have supportive
• One of the things that I will say would be the greatest support is more support...
• sort of the behavior management... ...behavior management techniques, we need more support for our teachers

Summary: The committee first approved the January 21, 2026 minutes and then heard two print requests from Senator Carrie Semmelroth tied to code cleanup work that originated from House Bill 14 last session. RS 32-89 would remove obsolete references to regional library systems that no longer exist, and RS 32-91 would clean up Title 33 by removing redundancies and non-applicable provisions. Both RSs were moved to print and approved without opposition. The committee then held a special presentation on spelling to communicate (S2C) from Kara Sanders, followed by testimony from Jennifer Ruiz on behalf of her daughter Ray Ruiz. Sanders described S2C as a communication method for non-speaking people who can point to letters to spell their thoughts, emphasizing presuming competence, the role of a communication regulation partner, and the need for training and safeguards. Ray Ruiz testified that S2C opened communication and educational opportunities for her, including sharing her interests, languages, and goals in psychology and advocacy; committee members asked about when she began spelling, learning languages, and her education plans. Jennifer Ruiz said S2C allowed her to truly get to know her daughter after years of uncertainty. The final presentation was from Dr. Brooke Blevins on behalf of the Idaho Association of Colleges of Teacher Education. She outlined educator preparation efforts across Idaho’s colleges and universities, including work on student behavior, educator ethics, career and technical education, rural teacher preparation, early literacy, and generative AI. In response to committee questions, she said schools need more support personnel and tiered interventions to address behavior, stressed that education is a right, and said clear expectations, stable environments, and teacher retention are important. Members raised concerns that student behavior is becoming a crisis and urged the group to help develop new solutions; the presentation ended with the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• The request is to retain 15 of those 51 FTP to support the behavioral health continuum for children,
• in behavioral health services through the Idaho Behavioral Health Plan.
• This is related to the Idaho Behavioral Health Plan.
• : the Division of Medicaid and the Division of Behavioral Health.
• And so this request is to maintain behavioral health funding or non-Medicaid behavioral health funding

Summary: The Senate Finance and House Appropriations committee met with a quorum present and first took up questions about a separate Rural Health Funding Task Force. Members asked who created it, its purpose, whether it was replacing JFAC, and whether it was tied to the governor’s task force. The chair said it was created by legislative leadership, not this committee, and that JFAC would still control funding decisions; the task force was described as a structure to help shape how any future appropriation would work. The committee also recognized guests from Boise State’s Executive Educational Leadership Program before moving to the General Fund Daily Update and then the Department of Health and Welfare budget review. Legislative Services analyst Alex Williamson reviewed Health and Welfare’s Division of Welfare, Mental Health Services, and Psychiatric Hospitalization budgets. Major items included one-time Medicaid eligibility system changes tied to federal law and House Bill 345, ongoing SNAP administrative cost shifts to the general fund, Medicaid expansion work requirement implementation costs, restoration of some transfer authority, and several behavioral health adjustments. In mental health, the department requested partial restoration of positions and funding tied to the former Behavioral Health Center of Excellence, but the director said the center itself had been disbanded and the request was instead for 15 FTE to support children’s mental health and the Jeff D. settlement. Other items included funding for mobile crisis services, a fund shift for hospital benefits and cost increases, replacement items at the state hospitals, and endowment fund adjustments. Director Juliet Sharon and Behavioral Health Administrator Ross Edmonds answered extensive questions about federal changes, managed care, and behavioral health service reductions. They said the department is implementing work requirements and more frequent Medicaid redeterminations required by federal law, starting with a one-month compliance period for applicants, and is not seeking a waiver to delay implementation. On behavioral health, they explained that reductions to Medicaid and non-Medicaid services were mirrored, that ACT services were discontinued as a bundled service but individual components remain available, and that the department is tracking hospital utilization, crisis services, and client touchpoints through Magellan. Members also asked about audits, deceased-member payments, endowment funds, staffing shortages, and whether some services were being duplicated; the director said program integrity processes are in place and that the department is trying to reduce duplication while maintaining reporting transparency. No formal votes were taken, and the committee adjourned after indicating it would meet again Monday morning.

Transcript Highlights:

• Certain behaviors Certain behavioral traits associated with autism may be misinterpreted as indicators
• I will also be supporting the substitute motion.
• I will also be supporting the substitute motion.
• So those were all created, I believe, before we had the Behavioral Health Council and before we had behavioral
• So those were all created, I believe, before we had the Behavioral Health Council and before we had behavioral

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The House Health and Welfare Committee met with a quorum, announced a change to start time the next day, and removed RS 33162 from the agenda at the sponsor’s request. The committee first heard RS 33412, the “Merit-based Health Care Act,” which would apply merit-based standards to Medicaid-funded health care and preserve civil rights compliance. Members questioned whether the bill would affect existing contracts and what impact it could have on state agencies that rely on Medicaid; the sponsor said he would clarify those issues later. The committee voted to introduce RS 33412. The committee then considered RS 32997 C2, which would revise child abandonment investigation procedures, require social worker documentation and psychological suitability evaluations, and add autism and introversion training for social workers. Members raised concerns about the bill’s penalties section, which appeared to create conflicting misdemeanor and felony consequences for violations, and about whether the training requirements were clear and appropriately targeted. After discussion, a substitute motion to return the RS to the sponsor passed on a 9-6 roll call, and RS 32997 C2 was sent back for revision. Next, the committee introduced RS 33561, a prompt-pay insurance bill that would update claim definitions, set new timelines for payment or denial, add good-faith standards, give the Department of Insurance more complaint-handling authority, and require transparency about AI use in claims processing. The sponsor said the bill was aimed at reducing long delays in claim payment while balancing provider and carrier responsibilities. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1314, which would eliminate regional director positions, regional behavioral health boards, and the Board of Health and Welfare to save about $410,000. Some members objected that the regional behavioral health boards provide important local input and questioned whether the savings outweighed the loss of community-level coordination, but the motion to send the bill to the floor with a due pass recommendation passed despite opposition. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• I support that motion.
• I urge you to support this bill, which ensures patients in Utah have access to behavioral...
• I urge you to support this bill, which ensures patients in Utah have access to behavioral health care
• I'd appreciate your support.
• We want it to have more support, more state support.

Keywords: 985, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I will also be supporting the substitute motion.
• I will also be supporting the substitute motion.
• And also the behavioral health boards.
• We have behavioral health people who are boots on the ground.
• So those were all created, I believe, before we had the Behavioral Health Council and before we had behavioral

Summary: The House Health and Welfare Committee heard several RS introductions and one Senate bill. RS 33412, the “Merit-based Health Care Act,” would apply merit-based standards to Medicaid-funded health care and was introduced after questions about whether it would affect existing contracts and how it would interact with Medicaid’s voluntary participation. RS 32997 C2 proposed changes to child abandonment investigations and social worker training, including autism and introversion training and new reporting limits; members raised concerns about penalties, the scope of the training, and whether the bill could create conflicts in reporting duties. After debate, the committee voted 9-6 to return RS 32997 C2 to the sponsor. RS 33561, a prompt-pay insurance bill, would redefine claims processing timelines, add good-faith standards, give the Department of Insurance more complaint-handling authority, and require transparency about AI use; it was introduced without objection. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1314, which would eliminate regional director positions, regional behavioral health boards, and the Board of Health and Welfare to reduce state spending by about $410,000. Supporters said the changes reflect the state’s move to a Behavioral Health Council and managed care structure and would remove an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy. Opponents warned that the regional behavioral health boards provide important local input and coordination, especially for mental health services, and said they had not been consulted before the bill advanced. Despite those concerns, the committee voted to send SB 1314 to the floor with a due pass recommendation.

Transcript Highlights:

• student behavioral health.
• schools in accessing training, technical assistance, and community resources that support student behavioral
• I'll first start out with a piece of the bill that I do support or can support.
• I'll first start out with a piece of the bill that I do support or can support.
• They need or want in their districts to support reaching the needs and meeting the needs of the behavioral

Summary: The House Education Committee met in executive session on several bills, beginning with House Bill 1795 on restraint and isolation in schools. Staff described the proposed substitute as prohibiting mechanical, chemical, and certain physical restraints, limiting planned use of restraint to cases with written medical necessity and parental consent, and revising the definition of serious harm. Members debated amendments clarifying that serious harm can include harm to another person, barring construction of rooms designed primarily for student isolation, and adding a null-and-void clause. The committee adopted the first two amendments but rejected the null-and-void amendment, then advanced the bill as amended. The final roll call on HB 1795 was 10 ayes, 7 nays, and 2 excused, and it was reported do pass as amended. The committee then considered Second Substitute House Bill 1634, which would create a statewide technical assistance and training framework for student behavioral health, coordinated by OSPI and ESDs with behavioral health agencies and community partners. A second proposed substitute removed some implementation requirements, narrowed the bill to coordination and access to services, added family-focused consultation and planning language, and removed certain reporting and needs-assessment provisions. A null-and-void amendment was offered but failed. Supporters said the bill would provide schools with flexible technical assistance rather than mandates, while opponents raised concerns about fiscal impact and unfunded obligations. The committee approved the bill on a 12-5 vote with 2 excused and reported it do pass. The committee also received staff briefings on House Bill 1662, which would require several education-related agencies and entities to transition to separate administrative services and operational independence on a delayed timeline, and House Bill 1683, which would adjust school board director-district election requirements and thresholds. No amendments were noted on HB 1683, and the committee did not reach final action on either of those bills before adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• support supplementary service rates for specific housing support providers.
• Our mission is to support meaningful lives through specialized behavioral health services that others
• in supportive housing.
• It would be devastating for supportive housing to not be able to use housing support.
• We currently support more than 700 households at AGIT receiving permanent supportive housing.

Bills: HF2434

Keywords: healthcare, personal care assistance, worker retention, disability services, state funding

Transcript Highlights:

• The first is student behavior.
• And soon, Boise State is hosting a symposium on behavior supports for all Region 3 educators, and you
• I know that classroom behavior is difficult oftentimes, and sometimes the teachers don't have supportive
• One of the things that I will say would be the greatest support is more support...
• sort of the behavior management... ...techniques, we need more support for our teachers to manage these

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The committee first approved the January 21, 2026 minutes and then took up two print hearings from Senator Carrie Semmelroth. Both RS 32-89 and RS 32-912 were described as code-cleanup measures stemming from work initiated after House Bill 14 and reviewed by agencies, the DOGE Task Force, and LSO staff. RS 32-89 would remove obsolete references to regional library systems that no longer exist, and RS 32-912 would make broader cleanup changes in Title 33 by removing redundancies and outdated provisions. The committee voted to print both RSs without opposition. The committee then heard a special presentation on spelling to communicate (S2C) from Kara Sanders, followed by testimony from Jennifer Ruiz on behalf of her daughter Ray Ruiz. Sanders described S2C as a communication method for non-speaking people who understand language but cannot reliably speak, emphasizing presuming competence, body support rather than message prompting, and the need for trained practitioners and safeguards. Ray Ruiz, speaking through spelling, said S2C opened communication, education, and advocacy opportunities for her, and her mother said it allowed the family to know her more fully after years of uncertainty. Committee members asked Ray about when she began spelling, learning languages, her education plans, and her favorite activities. The final presentation came from Dr. Brooke Blevins of the Idaho Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, who outlined educator preparation efforts across Idaho’s colleges and universities. She highlighted collaboration with state agencies and school partners, survey results showing employer satisfaction, and focus areas including student behavior, educator ethics, career and technical education, rural teacher preparation, early literacy, and responsible use of generative AI. Members questioned her about classroom behavior and discipline, teacher support, resources, consequences, and whether the current system can handle rising behavior challenges. Blevins said schools need more support personnel, consistent expectations, tiered interventions, and stronger teacher and leader preparation, while several senators stressed that behavior issues are worsening and asked the group to bring forward new solutions. The meeting ended with thanks to the presenters and adjournment.