Video & Transcript Research : 'Oklahoma Administrative Code'

Page 71 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 22nd, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • But the administrative burden on clinics, reimbursement systems, eligibility, and even the availability
  • However, under 1 TAC 357.51c, which is the administration role.
  • HB 1097 proposes an amendment to section 261.101. of the Texas Family Code focusing on the mandatory
  • Code 2293. However, this law has repeatedly been violated.
  • They do a great job with that and yes the Texas Penal Code does say it has the requirements but what
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • , while well-intentioned, splits oversight between two agencies, leading to inefficiencies in administration
  • Secondly, SB 2926 would transfer the administration of the state's veterans' mental health program from
  • Allowing the Texas Veterans Commission (TVC) to retain a portion of grant funds to cover administrative
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Property Tax Appraisals Apr 3rd, 2025

S/C on Property Tax Appraisals

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill amends the tax code to allow a surviving spouse, surviving child, executor of the estate, or
  • I do agree with, you know, and in fact, in the tax code, we already have a higher burden of proof to
  • in the counties that have one or with the county clerk if they do not have an elections administrator
  • You know, we work every year to, to, execute everything in the property tax code.
  • that makes the administration of the tax code and the process more effective. clear for us and more
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Academic & Career-Oriented Education Apr 3rd, 2025

S/C on Academic & Career-Oriented Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • , which is mandatory under this bill, and gives administrators the crucial training that they need to
  • Implementation of dual language programming depends on administrators' decisions that are made through
  • I believe that this bill gives guidance and opportunity for us to provide guidance to administrators.
  • Rather than providing education— Educators and administrators need a clear guide about what is and is
  • It's in our code. You had to go elsewhere to find it. There are 11 examples.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 1st, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, another kind of burdensome administrative requirement off the list.
  • This is just an administrative requirement. Without really a purpose.
  • Child Placing Agency Administrator.
  • This is just an internal administrative decision.
  • Code.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 1st, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • It relates to administrative remedies for certain fraud and abuse violations under Medicaid providing
  • administrative penalties.
  • from a local district attorney in House District One to address several inconsistencies. existing code
  • in the prosecutor's office being unable to turn over all evidence in the case. required by current code
  • House Bill 2665 amends Family Code. to mandate that D. F. P. S.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Mar 17th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 201 amends 2312.001. of the Texas Occupations Code, adding language that strengthens our legal
  • to the criminal code procedure.
  • House Bill 272 adds Texas Penal Code 32.315, fraudulent use of possession of a firearm. credit debit
  • card information to subchapter F, chapter 13A of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
  • And it's just simply to add this to the criminal code of procedure.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 6th, 2026 at 05:05 pm

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • public or private agencies may, upon request, be furnished copies or data for statistical or administrative
  • This is an independent board that's administratively attached to DPS.
  • They've done the administrative rulemaking, and they're moving forward to develop a fantastic modern
Bills: SB30, SB43, SB50, SB136
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Environment and Natural Resources Jan 27th, 2026

Environment and Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • We're going to go ahead and start with tab number five today: Senate Bill 1682 on the local administration
  • It's meant to provide that predictability, provide that visibility from a tax code perspective.
  • Hello, Jason Autry, Deputy County Administrator with Oakland County.
  • Jason Autry, Deputy County Administrator with Oklahoma County.
  • Oklahoma County spent $2 million in our wastewater treatment facility to treat this type of material
Summary: The committee took up several environmental bills, beginning with SB 1682 on local administration of vessel restrictions. Senator Trumbull said the bill would give cities and counties tools to address abandoned, derelict, and long-term anchored vessels while following state standards and FWC guidance. Members from affected areas spoke in support, citing recurring derelict vessel problems and the difficulty and cost of removal once vessels sink. The bill was reported favorably. The committee then heard SB 1468 on advanced wastewater treatment, which would require DEP to compile a detailed statewide report on wastewater treatment plants, including construction age, treatment levels, contaminant data, spill history, flood risk, and receiving waterbody impairment information. Florida Rural Water Association testified that any move to require advanced treatment for all plants over one MGD could create major financial burdens without dedicated funding. The bill was reported favorably. The committee also considered CS/SB 1294 on biosolids management, with a strike-all amendment adopted. Senator Bradley said the revised bill would require bulk Class AA biosolids fertilizer and compost products to be land applied only at agronomic rates and, absent a bona fide sale, only at permitted DEP-approved sites, with a transition date moved to July 1, 2028. Supporters said it would protect water quality and legitimate fertilizer and compost markets, while rural utilities asked for funding and flexibility. The committee reported the bill favorably. Next, the committee took up CS/SB 1628 on net zero policies by governmental entities. Senator Avila said the bill would prohibit local governments and other governmental entities from adopting or funding net zero policies, imposing related fees or taxes, or operating cap-and-trade or carbon trading programs. The committee adopted an amendment clarifying the definition of carbon dioxide. The bill drew extensive debate: supporters argued it would protect residents and businesses from higher costs and preserve predictability, while opponents said it would block local climate and clean-energy policies, including electric buses, energy-efficiency measures, and climate resilience planning. After public testimony on both sides, the bill was reported favorably. The committee also approved CS/SB 1474 on biosolids management, which Senator Gates said would require biosolids and septage to be treated at the highest practical level when wastewater treatment facilities are reasonably accessible and would bar Class B land application within 50 miles of a permitted wastewater facility. An amendment applying the statutory definition of septage was adopted, and the bill was reported favorably. Finally, the committee heard SB 558 on stormwater system standards. Senator Burgess said it would create statewide standards for municipal and county stormwater systems using FDOT guidelines and third-party inspections, with an amendment making technical changes and broadening who may perform inspections. Supporters said uniform standards could improve safety and reduce failures, while contractors, engineers, and industry groups warned it could raise costs, delay projects, and preempt stronger local standards. The bill remained under discussion as the transcript ended.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs May 19th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Include the person's city, state, and ZIP code, just as is currently done for donors.
  • The mechanism is interference with child custody under Texas Penal Code 25.03.
  • No, because there's actually a statute in the Family Code.
  • No, because there's actually a statute in the family code.
  • The mechanism is Chapter 152 of the Texas Family Code.
Bills: HB46, HB272
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs heard several House bills and took no final votes, leaving each bill pending after testimony. HB 272 would align venue and evidentiary rules for fraudulent use or possession of credit/debit card information with existing credit card abuse law; the sponsor said it would improve prosecutions, and the Texas Financial Crimes Intelligence Center supported it. HB 1661 would increase penalties for certain election-related offenses, including failure to distribute election supplies and early release of election results; no substantive opposition was heard. HB 551 would protect the residential addresses of people who receive campaign expenditures on public Texas Ethics Commission reports, similar to donor privacy protections, and a witness from Texas Eagle Forum later indicated support for the privacy change. The committee also heard HB 2820, which would raise the amount charitable bingo organizations may keep in operating capital from $50,000 to $100,000. The sponsor and a Texans for Charitable Bingo representative said inflation and operating costs have made the current cap too low and that the bill would help charities maintain stable operations without expanding gaming. HB 3181 would impose stronger consequences for repeated denial of court-ordered child possession and access, including limiting probation and requiring attorney’s fees after multiple contempt findings; a family court judge and a parent testified in support, while another witness argued the bill should be paired with stronger criminal enforcement and that parents already face high costs. HB 4157 would update Texas law for commercial spaceflight by recognizing liability waivers and preserving workers’ compensation rights; no one testified against it. The committee also heard HB 4145, which would let health care providers satisfy a timely billing requirement by sending bills to a patient’s legal representative in a personal injury case, closing what supporters described as a loophole in letter-of-protection situations. Finally, HB 46, relating to the Texas Compassionate Use Program, drew the most extensive discussion: supporters said it should expand access for legitimate medical cannabis patients and add more delivery methods and conditions, while opponents warned against broader marijuana expansion and questioned adding chronic pain and other conditions. The sponsor said he still supports the program and wants a balanced, regulated expansion, but noted the bill is still being worked on. All bills were left pending at the close of the hearing.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs May 7th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • During the Biden administration in New Mexico, out of state traffic has been expanding throughout the
  • That's currently in the education code, OK, um. But so this bill goes further in.
Bills: SB 6, SB 11, SB 33
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs May 7th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Today, during the Biden administration in New Mexico, out-of-state traffic has been expanding throughout
  • That's currently in the education code. Okay.
Bills: SB6, SB11, SB33
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs May 7th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • that's true for all of them, but I think that there are some of them that could choose to locate in Oklahoma
  • be able to understand the process and the probability of that data center moving to Texas versus Oklahoma
  • a load forecast and you're shopping at three places within the the state, you're shopping it in Oklahoma
  • Or is it still an issue if it's in Oklahoma?
  • I think it would be unlikely that building a data center in Oklahoma for my members would necessarily
Bills: SB6, SB11, SB33
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Education and Environment Division Apr 11th, 2025 at 09:30 am

Appropriations - Education and Environment Division

Bills: HB1540
Summary: The committee first took up amended bill 10-13, a school funding and education appropriations measure. Senator Schaible walked through the final version, which included changes to foundation aid, transportation grants, free and reduced-price meals funding, paraprofessional and teacher support programs, Native American education items, library and school facility projects, and several one-time grants. Members discussed removing the science center grant funding, and Senator Meyer objected to that removal, arguing that Grand Forks had raised matching private and local funds and that other cities had received similar state support. The committee also agreed to adjust regional education association funding to reflect six centers rather than seven, reducing that line to $600,000. The committee then adopted the amendment to 10-13 unanimously and passed the bill as further amended on a unanimous roll call, with Senator Shively designated as carrier. After a brief recess, the committee turned to bill 1540, but no formal action was taken. Bank of North Dakota and OMB representatives raised concerns that the draft included policy changes and procurement/IT exemptions that needed further discussion. Members agreed the bill would be delayed until Monday so the Bank, OMB, and NDIT could confer and work through the mechanics and policy issues before the committee moved it forward.