Transcript Highlights:

• The city supplied the water.
• A nearby water district is right next to them and could supply that water very easily.
• Well, in that case, if the water district can provide them water, then this is moot.
• to Missouri American Water.
• In a water plant, in a water system, like an electric...

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So the water conservation districts, surface water users, groundwater... So that's the board.
• Not against water conservation, not against water storage and conveyance, if you will, in that sense.
• We'll ask them if they're compliant with the state engineers' water rights issues, with drinking water
• But if it's a water project, we are checking their water rates.
• as good water.

Transcript Highlights:

• water needs.
• Bill 3898 would help address drinking water shortages and enable future water use planning.
• On the input side, how is the water treated? what volume of water, what rate of water, and so on.
• Water and associated non-storm water discharges.
• Water doesn't care.

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Water is our limiting factor. It's, it's not land, it's, it's water.
• So we need one Mexico water.
• That's called push water.
• But so when you say push water. That push water is for delivery or push water on crops.
• So you've got to put a bunch of push water basically, basically water is the vehicle to move more water

Transcript Highlights:

• of the United States, the protections for waters that would be protected under the Clean Water Act—waters
• Water Act protections.
• Those are used for our most polluted water water water.
• back Clean Water Act protections from what we're calling nexus waters.
• of nexus waters.

Summary: The committee heard SB 404 on metal shredding facilities, SB 601 on water quality protections after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Sackett decision, SB 682 on phasing out PFOS in certain consumer products, and later SB 646 on prenatal vitamins and toxic metal contamination. SB 561 had been pulled from the hearing. In each of the measures, the authors and supporters emphasized environmental and public health protections, while opponents raised concerns about overregulation, implementation, and unintended economic impacts. The committee also spent time on the policy details of each bill, including how smaller operators would be treated under SB 404, how “nexus waters” would be defined under SB 601, and whether alternatives and testing standards were adequate under SB 682 and SB 646. For SB 404, Senator Caballero said the bill would create a permitting and enforcement framework for metal shredding facilities, with operational standards for fire prevention, stormwater, and releases of shredder residue, while supporters argued it would bring needed certainty to a critical recycling industry. Opponents, including small recyclers and community/environmental advocates, said the bill was either too broad or not strong enough, with some warning it would burden smaller facilities and others arguing it would fail to protect overburdened communities. The committee approved SB 404 on a due-pass-as-amended motion to Appropriations, with recorded support from the chair and some members and opposition from others. SB 601 sought to restore state-level protections for waters that lost federal Clean Water Act coverage after Sackett, using a “nexus waters” framework and revised enforcement provisions after amendments removed the private right of action. Supporters said California needed to preserve protections for seasonal streams and wetlands and avoid backsliding, while opponents from business, agriculture, water districts, and local governments argued the definition remained too broad and could create uncertainty, costs, and unintended consequences. The committee also approved SB 601 on a due-pass motion to Appropriations, again with split votes. SB 682, which the committee also advanced, would phase out intentionally added PFOS in six product categories, including cleaning products, cookware, dental floss, ski wax, food packaging, and juvenile products, with an amendment delaying cookware implementation until 2030. Supporters framed it as a source-control measure to reduce PFAS contamination and lower long-term water treatment costs, while manufacturers and cookware interests argued the bill was overbroad, lacked workable testing standards, and could push consumers and businesses toward uncertain alternatives. The committee chair recommended an aye vote, and the measure passed to Appropriations. SB 646 was then introduced on prenatal vitamins, with supporters saying it would require testing and disclosure of heavy metals like lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury, while the opposition said disclosure must be handled carefully so as not to confuse consumers or undermine confidence in prenatal supplements.

Transcript Highlights:

• on water quality for domestic drinking water.
• Water on water quality for domestic drinking water.
• So water scarcity, water technology and data, water quality and water related hazards.
• So water scarcity, water technology and data, water quality, and water-related hazards.
• And so a topic that we're water on water quality for domestic drinking water.

Summary: The committee began with presentations from the Idaho Outfitters and Guides Association and the Idaho Water Resources Research Institute (IWRI). Eric Wyseth of IOGA described the association’s history, its more than 400 members, and the industry’s economic impact, saying outfitting and guiding generates about $891 million annually, supports over 7,500 jobs, and largely benefits rural Idaho. He also raised concerns about Fish and Game allocation changes, the importance of keeping public lands in public hands, and the ongoing FERC relicensing process for Hells Canyon Dam, where outfitters want daytime minimum flows maintained for jet boating. Dr. Kendra Kaiser of IWRI outlined the institute’s water research priorities and funding process, including a 32-member advisory committee, more than $500,000 distributed to university projects, and work on statewide issues such as water scarcity, recharge and water quality, snowpack data, flood mapping, monitoring gaps, East Snake Plain reach gains, and Lake Pend Oreille management. Director Matt Weaver praised IWRI’s renewed role as a neutral, applied-science partner for water management. The committee then set aside several code cleanup bills at the sponsor’s request. House Bill 569, sponsored by Representative Sauter, was introduced to expand recreational water skiing rules to allow driver-and-skier operation on public waters under specified equipment, age, and time restrictions; it was moved and passed to the floor with a due pass recommendation. Senate Bill 1222, presented by Representative Pickett, was described as a follow-up to last year’s domestic water exemption law, clarifying the definition of a subdivision as five lots and making the changes prospective beginning July 1, 2025. Testimony from the Idaho Water Users Association supported the bill, and it was also sent to the floor with a due pass recommendation after questions about domestic use, irrigation limits, and enforcement. Finally, Representative Boyle presented Senate Joint Memorial 108, which urges federal officials to address concerns that livestock producers on BLM and Forest Service allotments are discouraged from filing depredation claims for wolf or grizzly bear losses because of threats to their permits or grazing terms. The memorial was supported by a Farm Bureau letter in the packet. The committee moved it to the floor with a due pass recommendation, and the meeting adjourned after no further business.

Transcript Highlights:

• County water for a year.
• water to our community.
• back to water availability and the potable water availability in the area.
• any water.
• excess water, where there's water supply needs, where there's storage capacity.

Summary: The House Committee on Natural Resources met to focus on flooding issues across Texas, with particular attention to South Texas and the recent catastrophic flooding in Central Texas. Chair Harris and Vice Chair Martinez emphasized that flooding is a statewide problem requiring continued legislative attention. The committee heard invited testimony from Hidalgo County Commissioner David Fuentes and Hidalgo County Drainage District No. 1 General Manager Raul Sassine, who described the March flood event in Hidalgo County, including more than 20 inches of rain, six deaths, over $100 million in local damage, widespread road flooding, and repeated shutdowns of Interstate 2 and its frontage roads. They argued that existing drainage systems are under capacity, that TxDOT projects must account for downstream drainage impacts, and that local governments have already invested heavily in mitigation through bonds and partnerships. Fuentes and Sassine also described the county’s long-term flood mitigation and water-reuse efforts, including the Delta region water management project, which would capture stormwater, runoff, and treated effluent, reduce flooding, and create potable water supply. They said the drainage district manages about 780 miles of channels and 1,100 acres of detention facilities, has used prior Flood Infrastructure Fund and GLO grants, and has ongoing applications for additional state and federal assistance. Members discussed the need for TxDOT coordination, emergency access on frontage roads, local “skin in the game,” and the possibility of combining flood control with aquifer recharge and water supply projects. Texas Water Development Board Executive Administrator Brian McMath then presented an overview of the state’s flood planning and funding framework, including the post-Harvey legislative changes that created the Flood Infrastructure Fund, the Texas Infrastructure Resiliency Fund, and the regional/state flood planning process. He summarized the first state flood plan adopted in 2024, noting that about one in six Texans live or work in known flood hazard areas and that regional plans identified 4,609 flood risk reduction solutions with an estimated cost of $54.5 billion. He also reviewed TWDB programs for flood grants, community assistance, flood insurance compliance, stream gauges, TexMesonet, flood mapping, and the TexasFlood.org viewer. Members asked about drainage fees, technical assistance, gauge placement, the relationship between flood maps and FEMA FIRMs, and whether flood mitigation funds could support aquifer storage and recovery or recharge projects; TWDB staff said such projects can be eligible if they include flood mitigation components, but direct technical assistance cannot be paid from Flood Infrastructure Fund dollars. The committee concluded by expressing interest in further study of combining flood mitigation with aquifer recharge, and then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Waters of the United States, the protections, waters that would be protected under the Clean Water Act
• , waters that had been protected for many, many years under the Clean Water Act.
• back Clean Water Act protections from what we're calling nexus waters.
• . of Nexus Waters.
• Water District, United Water Conservation District, and West Valley Water District, opposed unless amended

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Idaho is at a water crossroads.
• Across the state, the water board and water users are working to address water challenges in every basin
• Obviously, a lot of water.
• Obviously, a lot of water.
• uses and water supplies.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The House Resources and Conservation Committee approved the January 29, 2026 minutes and then heard a series of presentations focused largely on water infrastructure and water management. Laura Hurway of the Idaho Groundwater Appropriators introduced the program, emphasizing statewide water challenges and the need for public-private investment to avoid future curtailment. Lori Gray of the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District described the $21 million modernization of the Ridenbaugh Headworks Canal, including automated crest gates, a trash screen, and an ogee weir, with funding from state grants, the Idaho Water Resources Board, and federal sources. Daniel Hoke, Boise River Watermaster, outlined the Treasure Valley Water Supply Project, which is using telemetry and modeling to track declining drain return flows and groundwater interactions, with a phase-three effort to regulate 15 Mile Creek to stabilize flows. Jay Barlogi of Twin Falls Canal Company described a large canal-lining and pipe-replacement project to reduce seepage, improve efficiency, and add return-flow monitoring and automation. Alan Jackson of the Bingham Groundwater District and Aaron Dowling of Fremont-Madison Irrigation District discussed groundwater monitoring wells, telemetry, canal automation, pipeline conversions, and the role of state, federal, and private funding in improving water delivery and management. The committee then considered several legislative proposals. Representative Raymond introduced RS 331-09C-1 to give the Idaho State Department of Agriculture continuous spending authority for the Range Improvement Fund; the motion to introduce passed. Representative Petzke presented RS 33-135, a concurrent resolution supporting wildlife crossings when backed by local communities; it was also introduced. Representative Boyle presented House Bill 502, which would codify existing Forest Products Commission rules and update statutory language; after discussion about forest health, wildfire mitigation, and public education, the committee voted to send the bill to the House with a do-pass recommendation. Finally, Representative Dygert presented Senate Joint Memorial 107 supporting the Integra Delamar mining project and urging timely federal permitting; after testimony from an Integra representative about BLM engagement since 2020 and recent progress through the Fast-41 process, the committee voted to send the memorial to the floor with a do-pass recommendation. The meeting adjourned with plans to reconvene on Thursday.

Transcript Highlights:

• And it looks like we'll have water there eventually too, more water.
• for water storage.
• Note again, water is on both sides of these. Stop logs are below the water.
• That accelerates the water. Accelerated water has a lot of energy.
• form into the water?

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• More water and requiring more infrastructure funding and prices to skyrocket, so on water.
• We'll start on the water bills of 2026.
• of brackish water that we can...
• Water is life, and we need to be cautious and not let Arizona give away and kneel to promising water
• Now, water is not my area of expertise, but even I know you’re not going to find water there.

Summary: The committee took up a series of water, mining, and regulatory bills. HB 2260 and HB 2986, both cleanup/technical measures, were passed unanimously with due-pass recommendations after brief staff presentations and no opposition. HB 2827, extending Pinal AMA groundwater fee authority and related fund timelines to support irrigation district infrastructure, also passed unanimously after testimony from district representatives about using the fees for wells, piping, and conservation projects tied to the loss of CAP water. The committee then heard HCM 2009, which urges Congress to amend the Antiquities Act, address split estate mineral rights, and streamline mining permitting. Mining industry testimony emphasized Arizona’s copper and critical mineral production and the economic and national security importance of access to mineral resources; opponents argued the memorial would undermine protected lands and conservation. The memorial passed on a 5-4 vote. HCR 2038, supporting a seven-state Colorado River agreement and Arizona’s position in ongoing negotiations, drew broad support from water interests and passed 9-1. HB 2078, clarifying that expanded public notice for aggregate mine reclamation plans applies only to new plans and not existing mines, passed 9-1 after the sponsor and industry witnesses said it was meant to match prior legislative intent. HB 2026, HB 2027, HB 2028, HB 2031, HB 2094, and HB 2095 were then considered as water-management bills. HB 2026 and HB 2028 passed 6-4 over concerns from ADWR, while HB 2027 passed 6-4 after adoption of a Griffin amendment despite strong opposition from CAP, municipal water users, ADWR, and several cities who warned it could weaken assured water supply protections and CAGRD replenishment obligations. HB 2031 and HB 2094 also passed on narrow 5-4 votes. HB 2095 was still under discussion at the end of the transcript, with opposition testimony from municipal water interests arguing that groundwater availability should be evaluated regionally rather than by a single-well or site-specific approach.

Transcript Highlights:

• And it looks like we'll have water there eventually too, more water.
• for water storage.
• So water, oops, excuse me, water has to be allowed to flow through there at all times.
• Note again, water is on both sides of these. Stop logs are below the water.
• form into the water?

Summary: The committee opened its third interim meeting with roll call, approved the November 13, 2025 minutes, and the chair reviewed prior committee work, including a denied request for a fertilizer-capacity study and a planned later discussion of the Union Pacific/Norfolk Southern merger issue. Commissioner Doug Goring then presented Department of Agriculture updates on uncrewed aerial systems grants to detect noxious weeds, the state’s irrigation potential, the low-carbon fuels program for ethanol plants, the Environmental Impact Mitigation Fund, model zoning ordinances for animal feeding operations, and fertilizer production and supply in North Dakota. Members asked about funding sources, fertilizer storage and availability, natural gas and water needs for future fertilizer plants, and how the model zoning website would help counties and townships apply setback and odor tools. A substantial portion of the meeting focused on the Department of Water Resources’ economic analysis tool for water conveyance and flood-related projects. Dr. Dwayne Poole explained that the department is proposing changes to better account for end-of-useful-life conditions and updated hydrologic data, while still limiting the model to direct, demonstrable costs and benefits. He said the goal is to make the analysis more realistic and consistent without changing statute, and he provided examples of how project benefits could change as drains age or as rainfall and flood data evolve. Committee members and water-user representatives generally supported continued work on the proposal, while raising concerns about downstream impacts, closed-basin projects, and whether the changes would meaningfully affect project approvals. The committee then heard from John Paskowski, state engineer, on Devil’s Lake, the West End and East End outlets, and the Tolna Coulee control structure. He reviewed lake history, outlet capacities, sulfate and downstream flow limits, and explained that the control structure is intended to prevent a catastrophic uncontrolled release by slowing erosion and head cutting. Members asked about water quality trends, the length of the downstream flow constraint, and whether the Tolna Coulee area had been studied for possible natural overflow or silt buildup. The discussion emphasized ongoing flooding concerns, mitigation for affected landowners, and the need to balance outlet operations with downstream water quality and infrastructure protection.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, we'd have a reliable water source. We could get water.
• They actually export water to Jordan. And their extra water, imagine extra water in New Mexico.
• well water.
• Uh, that now flows water into that, so they have water, sustainable water.
• There's no reason to let people wait and go into water starvation, water struggles, uh, water hunger,

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> stormwater, and drinking water systems. stormwater, and drinking water systems.
• &gt;&gt; Uh and members, water water &gt;&gt; Uh and members, water water infrastructure<00:08:12.960
• Paul Regional Water Services provides drinking water to more than 450,000 residents across St.
• Paul Regional Water Services provides drinking water to more than 450,000 residents across St.
• </c> earthworms deep in the boundary waters. earthworms deep in the boundary waters.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• water settlement?
• Water or agricultural water.
• Generated this water.
• this is pure water, it is water vapor.
• Sorry, ah, we are not creating water, but, ah, we use the alternative water as because water H2O has

Transcript Highlights:

• And it looks like we'll have water there eventually too, more water.
• for water storage.
• That accelerates the water. Accelerated water has a lot of energy.
• form into the water?
• water level?

Summary: The committee met for its third interim meeting, approved the prior meeting minutes, and heard a series of statutory reports from the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Water Resources. Chair Hauck noted that Legislative Management had denied the committee’s earlier request for a fertilizer capacity study, and that the committee would also revisit the proposed Union Pacific/Norfolk Southern merger later in the day. Commissioner Doug Goring reported on several agriculture topics, including uncrewed aerial systems grants to detect noxious weeds, irrigation expansion potential, the low-carbon fuels program for ethanol plants, the Environmental Impact Mitigation Fund, model zoning ordinances for animal feeding operations, and fertilizer production and usage in North Dakota. He emphasized that fertilizer supply depends heavily on natural gas and water, that most nitrogen fertilizer is imported, and that large-scale fertilizer plants require very large capital investments. Members discussed fertilizer storage, natural gas pipeline capacity, water availability, and the role of state infrastructure in supporting value-added agriculture. A major portion of the meeting focused on the Department of Water Resources’ economic analysis tool for water conveyance and flood-related projects. Dr. Dwayne Poole explained that the tool was created under 2017 legislation to help evaluate projects expected to cost $1 million or more, and that the department is proposing adjustments to better account for end-of-useful-life conditions and changing hydrologic data. He said the changes would remain focused on direct, demonstrable costs and benefits, not indirect impacts, and would be implemented through guidance and operating procedures rather than statutory changes. Committee members and water users discussed whether the revisions would better reflect real-world conditions, including deferred maintenance, changing rainfall patterns, and downstream effects. A representative from the Water Resource District Association said the group was working with DWR and hoped to review test scenarios before the June meeting. The committee then received a detailed presentation on Devils Lake, its outlets, and the Tolna Coulee control structure. State Engineer John Paskowski reviewed lake history, outlet capacities, sulfate and downstream flow constraints, and the purpose of the Tolna Coulee structure in limiting head cutting and preventing uncontrolled downstream releases. Members questioned whether the structure was effectively a dam, whether the lake would naturally overflow without it, the last time the outlets ran, and whether water quality in Devils Lake has improved over time. Paskowski said the outlets last operated in August 2025, that sulfate levels still limit operations, and that the lake has freshened somewhat but not enough to eliminate water-quality concerns. The discussion also touched on whether water from flooded areas or closed-basin systems could be reused for irrigation, and on the broader implications of wet cycles, inundated land, and drainage management across the state.

Transcript Highlights:

• Matt Weaver, Director of the Department of Water Resources and Administrator for the Soil Water Conservation
• There's a focus on water issues where the greatest synergy exists among the Soil and Water Conservation
• is water-focused, so folding it under a water agency raises concern that some of these other components
• conservation commission the work they do is water focused so folding in under a water agency there's
• That's with the Water Board.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The Senate Agricultural Committee approved the minutes from its February 17 and February 19, 2026 meetings without opposition. The committee then received a presentation from Matt Weaver of the Department of Water Resources and Bryant Keakley of the Langdon Group on a study evaluating a proposed merger of the Soil and Water Conservation Commission into the Department of Water Resources. The presenters described a months-long stakeholder process, including interviews, a survey, and a workshop, and said the study recommended the merger proceed with safeguards to preserve the commission’s non-regulatory identity, local relationships, and broader conservation mission. The recommendations included placing the merged unit within IDWR as a bureau led by a bureau chief selected with commission input, keeping the commission’s board structure and legislative reporting, protecting its budget and branding, and formalizing a partnership framework to avoid enforcement or policy interference. They also said the merger could create administrative efficiencies and some personnel savings, including an estimated immediate savings of about $110,000 from eliminating the administrator position, with additional longer-term savings possible in operations and equipment. Committee members asked about the study’s cost, staffing and supervisory structure, and whether the merger had support; Weaver said the contract cost was about $90,000 total, the House had passed HB 503 67-0, SCR 115 had already been enacted, and most stakeholders supported the proposal, with Idaho Farm Bureau now neutral. Weaver said the next steps would be to complete the pending legislation, work through the executive agency legislative services process, draft additional statutory changes, and return in 2027 with a combined budget and further legislation. The chair closed the meeting after also giving a brief update on statewide water supply conditions, saying snowpack was around 74% of normal and that many basins were trending below average, though late-season precipitation could still improve conditions.

Transcript Highlights:

• I deal with water a lot.
• So the water being able to enforce against water theft becomes that much more notable.
• things with water.
• They're just going to ask you to repay that water back with water. That continues, right?
• Water deliverables.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• One side wants to pull water from an area. And the other side doesn't want that water to leave.
• Texas and water ownership.
• Or if that's your water, that's your water, and make that decision.
• Clearly identify a pool of water here, a pool of water here, and a pool of water here, or is all the
• water connected?

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• water?
• and for clean water.
• there's no water because of the water will is drilled in the aluvium that's right illegal water wells
• by the Texas Water Fund.
• Supporting water specific specific water related budget requests for the Water Development Board TCEQ

Bills: SB1, SB 1

Keywords: appropriations, budget, state funding, education, healthcare, infrastructure, campground safety, youth camp regulations, flood safety, emergency evacuation, health and safety standards, 1185, senate, all