Video & Transcript Research : 'model subdivision rules'
Page 70 of 500
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
- Speaker, notwithstanding House Rule 23A or any other House rule, I move that the House reconsider its
- I'm assuming it to Rule 14G.
- Speaker, I move that notwithstanding House Rule 11D or any other House rule, Senate Bill 1199 be placed
- Notwithstanding House Rule 9C8 relating to the calendar.
- Speaker Pro Tem, notwithstanding House Rule 23A or any other House rules, I move that the House reconsider
DE
Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Capital Improvement Committee Meeting Jun 23rd, 2026
Capital Improvement
Transcript Highlights:
- Rule 12 project list epilogue and Rule 12 updates, DelDOT project list and DelDOT epilogue.
- Let's start with Rule 12.
- There's a tab in your binders called Rules, and there are just some minor changes, I think, through Rule
- Okay, so our changes to Rule 12 are pretty basic.
- But that's a current rule that's been in place for a while.
Summary:
The committee met for a fiscal year 2027 capital budget writing session with all 12 members present. It first reviewed and approved the DNREC Resource Conservation and Development drainage project list, which would add projects across New Castle, Kent, and Sussex counties and bring the total eligible projects to 1,561. Members offered personal remarks thanking retiring conservation district staff, especially Kevin Donnelly, for years of work on drainage and water issues. The committee then reviewed DelDOT Rule 12 changes, including annual date updates and a reduction in the inflation markup applied to older estimates, and approved the rule as amended.
The committee next adopted DelDOT Appendix A and the FY27 paving and rehabilitation list, including the subdivision street management fund and various road resurfacing projects. DelDOT explained that paving projects are for state-of-good-repair work and that major changes from corridor studies would be handled separately. The committee also approved DelDOT epilogue changes, including updates to authorization amounts, a $25 million increase for toll infrastructure work, changes to subdivision street paving language, and an increase in the subdivision street paving management fund to $30 million. Several sections were placed on hold for later updates.
The committee then moved through boilerplate epilogue sections in the bond bill, approving a wide range of provisions affecting conservation districts, housing, economic development, corrections, DNREC, public safety, transportation, agriculture, fire prevention, education, and other agencies. Many sections were adopted in groups, while some were held for later revisions or deleted as no longer needed. The session included updates to school capital rules, transportation restrictions and reporting requirements, DNREC conservation and land-use provisions, and funding and administrative authorities across multiple agencies. The committee broke for lunch after approving the education-related sections through 147, with additional sections still pending.
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
House Standing Committee on Elections, Const. Amendments & Intergovernmental Affairs (2-6-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- And we will be implementing the 24-hour rule for committee amendments, committee substitutes, to the
- implementing record um and we will be implementing the<00:02:02.360>
24-hour <00:02:03.000>rule - 00:02:03.240>
for <00:02:03.439>committee <00:02:04.039>committee the 24-hour rule - for committee committee the 24-hour rule for committee committee amendments<00:02:05.039>
committee - where sections of the same subdivision where sections of the same subdivision were<00:05:57.240>
Keywords:
Consideration of HB 27 00:04:20
Presentation by Secretary of State 00:10:44
Presentation by Karen Sellers and Jason Denny 00:35:56
Consideration of HB 45 00:55:36, 958, all
Summary:
The committee first handled House Bill 27, which would remove the prohibition on political yard signs in planned communities statewide while still allowing communities to regulate size, placement, and duration. The sponsor said the 2023 Planned Communities Act created an unintended consequence by treating similar homeowners differently based on grandfathering dates, and a legal explanation was offered that the bill would clarify the law and avoid constitutional problems. After discussion, the committee voted 15-0 to pass the bill with favorable expression.
The next item was an update from the Secretary of State on the 2024 election and implementation of House Bill 53, which created prompt post-election audits. He said the audits were carried out smoothly, most found no discrepancies, and no election winners changed, though he recommended adding a specific timeline to the law. He also discussed voter-roll maintenance, saying Kentucky has removed more than 440,000 ineligible voters since 2020, and argued that federal law and limited access to federal databases remain the main obstacles to faster cleanup.
Members asked about the possibility of improper removals, double voting across states, and how provisional voting works. The Secretary said anyone improperly removed can reregister, that any double-voting abuse is likely marginal but still unacceptable, and that provisional ballots are available when eligibility is in doubt and can be reviewed by the county board of elections. He also urged Congress to modernize the 1993 federal voter-registration law, improve access to death and citizenship data, and create a central interstate information-sharing system for election officials.
NM
New Mexico 2026 Regular Session
IC - Legislative Finance Apr 27th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- And so we modeled that at 350 million from the general fund in FY30 as a backfill.
- Then we've modeled on your Non-recurring budget if you want to continue spending the same amount like
- Municipalities, political subdivisions, or public schools?
- Predictive modeling As well as targeted outreach can increase enrollment.
- There's also potential to use predictive modeling. As Dr.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Who pays tax initially, that is, there's an assumption built into the modeling for this that for the
- This particular analysis is done in, uh, largely with a model that at LBB right now.
- It's a political subdivision of the state.
- They create and maintain the local property tax database, certify the appraisal rule.
- urge the body to consider is the fact that the legislature is the author and creator of political subdivisions
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- incidence is different from who pays tax. initially that is there's an assumption built into the modeling
- This particular analysis is done largely with a model at LBB right now.
- have our local appraisal side of things. the kind of nexus of what happens at the local level. subdivision
- appraised value, they create and maintain the local property. tax database, certify the appraisal rule
- urge the body to consider is the fact that Legislature is the author and creator of political subdivisions
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Limiting zoning authority of local governments over housing types 3/3/26
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, subdivision four is your homes.
- Subdivision six is your mixed bill.
- Uh subdivision 7 is your ADUs end.
- Representative Skraba, so if you're looking at subdivision 7 on ADUs, that is what subdivision 11 on
- was outlawed, um, you know, the rules was outlawed, um, you know, the rules change<01:25:31.840>
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection - 03/27/25
Commerce and Consumer Protection
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:04:44.600>
and understands the laws and the rules and understands the laws and the rules - Because, yes, oh, I didn't know I have this now, I got to live within these rules.
- Because, yes, oh, I didn't know I have this now, I got to live within these rules.
- Because, yes, oh, I didn't know I have this now, I got to live within these rules.
- Because, yes, oh, I didn't know I have this now, I got to live within these rules.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Health and Human Services - 02/18/25
Health and Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- Subdivision four requires health systems and hospitals to report to MDH the facility fees they charged
- Subdivision five is rulemaking provision for MDH, and then subdivision six is enforcement.
- He said it would go under section 609.25, subdivision 3, and he read the subdivision, which concerns
- <01:18:13.920>
three read that for you um subdivision three read that for you um subdivision - the the section um subdivision the the section um subdivision 2<01:21:01.360>
um <01:21:01.639
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Science, Technology and Energy (02/03/2026)
Science, Technology and Energy
Transcript Highlights:
- The process for a subdivision of law.
- Energy shall adopt rules through the Energy shall adopt rules through the rulemaking<01:10:57.360>
- such rules. So they may not do them. such rules. So they may not do them.
- We can certainly adopt rules for this, but adopting rules is forward-looking.
- <01:15:37.040>
for the department shall adopt rules for the department shall adopt rules for
VT
Transcript Highlights:
- without permanent zoning or subdivision without permanent zoning or subdivision bylaws<00:50:38.079
- on subdivisions, We're working on subdivisions, the<00:58:41.599>
bylaws, <00:58:42.319>but - reach imposed by tier 3 and road rule. reach imposed by tier 3 and road rule.
- Subdivision conditions and procedures.
- <01:51:07.280>
36B passed by the House, subdivision 36B passed by the House, subdivision 36B
Summary:
The House returned to Senate Bill 325 on regional planning and Act 250 tier jurisdiction and first took up Representative Charlton’s amendment to extend the interim housing exemptions in tier one areas from 2028 to 2030. Charlton argued the change would better align the exemptions with the state’s 2030 housing targets and give rural communities and smaller developers more realistic time to plan and build. Committee members opposing the amendment said the exemptions would no longer be needed once 1A and 1B areas are established, and Ways and Means reported an unfavorable straw poll. After debate, the House rejected the amendment by roll call, 66-76.
During debate, members discussed whether the extension would help or hinder housing production, with supporters emphasizing rural Vermont, achievable timelines, and the need for certainty for developers, while opponents stressed that the temporary exemptions were meant to bridge the transition to the new tier system. The House also heard questions about whether any communities had actually adopted 1A or 1B status yet, and it was noted that future land use maps were not yet complete. The chamber then moved to a second amendment from Representative Dobervich, which would extend certain interim Act 250 exemptions for designated village centers and nearby areas through January 1, 2031, including projects of 50 units or fewer or mixed-income/mixed-use projects meeting specified infrastructure criteria, with municipal bodies able to opt out.
Dobervich said the proposal would expand access to the interim exemptions for rural communities that lack permanent zoning or subdivision bylaws but otherwise meet the criteria, helping more towns build housing in already developed areas. Opponents argued the amendment could allow too much development in small towns without local review and questioned how many municipalities would actually qualify. The debate continued with members discussing the relationship between Act 181, the temporary exemptions, and the ongoing work to create future land use maps and tier designations.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- to the requirements of this subdivision to the requirements of this subdivision of<00:04:32.440>
- says the subdivision. says the subdivision.
- actors who don't play by the rules. actors who don't play by the rules.
- subdivision nine. subdivision nine.
- needed according to this subdivision." needed according to this subdivision."
MN
NE
Nebraska 2025-2026 Regular Session
Legislative Morning Session Apr 9th, 2026
Nebraska Unicameral Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- And Nebraska has over 2,300 local taxing subdivisions that levy property taxes.
- And Nebraska has over 2,300 local taxing subdivisions that levy property taxes. 300 local taxing subdivisions
- So here we're treating all political subdivisions the same.
- This would bring uniformity to all the political subdivisions. Everyone is treated the same.
- I value the work of our political subdivisions.
Bills:
LB737, LB753, LB788, LB913, LB1055, LB1195, LB1216, LB1256, LB429, LB721, LB722, LB727, LB743, LB745, LB749, LB778, LB787, LB365A, LB823, LB900, LB903, LB940, LB954, LB1127, LB1127A, LB1205, LB1240, LR293, LR296, LR422, LR505, LR507
Keywords:
LB737, Olmstead, developmental disabilities, disability services, community-based services, integrated settings, DHHS, Department of Health and Human Services, stakeholder advisory committee, independent consultant, public hearing, legislative oversight, disability rights, community integration, housing, employment, education, transportation, community supports, self-advocacy
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:09:03.320>
and referred to the Committee on Rules and referred to the Committee on Rules - President, Senator, it's because of our Senate rule, um and I believe it's Senate Rule 8.2.
- President, Senator, it's because of our Senate rule, um and I believe it's Senate Rule 8.2.
- confirmation calendar under Senate Rule confirmation calendar under Senate Rule 8.2,<00:55:07.640
- violating rule 36.2. violating rule 36.2.
Summary:
The Senate convened under a call, established a quorum, received a chaplain’s prayer and the pledge, and then proceeded through routine business. Members adopted the committee reports except those relating to Senate Concurrent Resolution 6, gave second reading to Senate File 203 and several House files, and referred Senate File 5200 to Rules and Administration. The chamber also adopted a motion to return Senate File 4390 from the general orders calendar to the Finance Committee.
The main floor activity centered on a series of motions to send withdrawn executive appointments back to their originating committees under Senate Rule 8.2. Senator Putnam moved to return appointments from the Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development Committee, including the Board of Animal Health, the Veterans Affairs commissioner, and the Rural Finance Authority. Senator Swadzinski moved a similar action for Education Policy appointments, and Senator Her did so for Environment, Climate, and Legacy appointments, including the DNR commissioner, the PCA commissioner, the Clean Water Council, and related boards. Senator Wicklund later moved to return Health and Human Services appointments, including the Children, Youth and Families commissioner, Health commissioner, VNSHUR Board, and EMS director.
These motions prompted extended debate. Supporters of returning the appointments argued that the Senate has a constitutional advice-and-consent duty and that committee hearings should occur before floor consideration. Opponents, mainly Republicans, argued that sending the appointments back without floor action avoided accountability and transparency, especially in light of fraud concerns in state programs and agencies. Some authors said hearings had not yet been scheduled or that the committee process should come first; others noted at least one hearing had already occurred on a health nomination. The debate repeatedly focused on whether the Senate was fulfilling its constitutional role or delaying confirmation review.
Roll-call votes were requested on the appointment motions. The Putnam, Swadzinski, Her, and Wicklund motions were each adopted by narrow 34-33 margins, returning the appointments to committee rather than leaving them on the confirmation calendar for floor action.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- 04:23.759>
therefore <00:04:24.280>the <00:04:24.440>medical <00:04:24.800>model - project is therefore the medical model project is therefore the medical model we<00:04:25.479>
- program is here in Minnesota, but ultimately in the future this pilot program will be the working model
- approach P primarily in medical model approach P primarily in institutional<00:10:55.440>
and - <00:30:51.240>
would whether the the first subdivision would whether the the first subdivision
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- <01:01:48.599>
the <01:01:48.720>local under the subdivision the local under the subdivision - approval, an agreement as part of a subdivision approval that the streets in the subdivision will subsequently
- :19:54.480>
the part of a subdivision approval that the part of a subdivision approval that the - >
will streets in the subdivision will streets in the subdivision will subsequently<01:19:57.040 - <02:11:02.800>
approval building permit or subdivision approval building permit or subdivision
CA
Transcript Highlights:
- We apply these rules consistently to all people who participate in our proceedings regardless of the
- The rules for today's hearing include no talking or loud noises from the audience, public comments may
- It may mention them in in one subdivision but not account for them in another subdivision and the process
- That's why as a legislature whose response, who the courts have repeatedly ruled.
- Special day programs are not a one-size-fits-all model. we must do better for our students.
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - 02/26/25
Judiciary and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- It's also against the rules of ethics and the rules of criminal procedure.
- It's also against the rules of ethics and the rules of criminal procedure.
- It's also against the rules of ethics and the rules of criminal procedure.
- It's also against the rules of ethics and the rules of criminal procedure.
- It's also against the rules of ethics and the rules of criminal procedure.
VT
Transcript Highlights:
- organization which develops the model organization which develops the model energy<01:51:57.160>
- fuels covered by the rules must comply. fuels covered by the rules must comply.
- approved and funded this year, rule approved and funded this year, rule making<02:20:29.680>
- <02:28:04.000>
making <02:28:04.760>section rule making section rule making section uh - They are currently developing new rules They are currently developing new rules to<03:08:54.000>
Summary:
The House first suspended the rules briefly to make announcements, including welcoming former representative Doug Gage to the gallery. It then returned to House Bill 211 on data brokers and personal information, where the Appropriations Committee explained a $50,000 appropriation to the Secretary of State for a consultant-led study on an accessible deletion mechanism for consumers to delete personal data held by data brokers, with interim and final reports due in 2027 and 2028. The committee reported a 9-0-2 vote in favor, and the House agreed to the Commerce and Economic Development Committee’s amendment and ordered third reading.
Floor debate on H. 211 focused heavily on the bill’s deletion and exemption framework. Supporters argued the bill is needed to give Vermonters meaningful control over their data and to prevent data brokers from commingling information for unrelated uses. Opponents warned the bill could conflict with existing federal frameworks such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Gramm-Leach-Bliley, and the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act, and could make credit, banking, insurance, fraud prevention, and identity verification harder. In response, the sponsor said the bill uses use-case-based exemptions rather than broad entity-level exemptions, noted testimony from banks, insurers, a data broker, a former data broker employee, and the Attorney General, and said no constitutional concerns were raised. The House ultimately adopted the amendment and advanced the bill.
After H. 211, the House moved to House Bill 577, establishing the Vermont Prescription Drug Discount Card Program. Committee reports from Health Care, Ways and Means, and Appropriations were read into the record, and the Colchester member described the bill as a way to lower prescription drug costs by joining the multi-state Array Rx program. The bill would let any Vermont resident obtain a free discount card for FDA-approved prescription drugs, with claimed savings up to 80% on generics and 20% on brand-name drugs. The House then proceeded to second reading on H. 577.