Transcript Highlights:

• THE TERM RULE IS DEFINED IN SECTION 120.526, FLORIDA STATUTES, AS EACH AGENCY'S STATEMENT OF APPLICABILITY
• SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZES OR REQUIRES AN AGENCY TO ADOPT DEVELOP ESTABLISH OR OTHERWISE CREATE ANY STATEMENT
• A STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 120.54 IN FLORIDA

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• secretary of state in consultation with the attorney general's office to put together the ballot statement
• So, if you look at 2224 317, I believe it says uh the ballot statement needs to include the estimated
• office to to put together<00:04:07.760> the<00:04:08.080> ballot<00:04:08.480> statement
• <00:04:08.879> and<00:04:09.120> to together the ballot statement and to together the
• needs to in uh include the statement needs to in uh include the estimated<00:07:19.360> fiscal

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I did receive a request from Senator Cortese that I read his statement. It is a brief statement.
• Cortese, I will read his statement.
• It is a brief statement: "As Chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, I am deeply concerned that
• In response to the January initial statement of reasons, some industry stakeholders alluded in public
• Do you agree or disagree with that statement? Thank you.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Environmental Quality Committee and Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 2 held a joint hearing on CARB’s proposed amendments to the cap-and-invest regulations. Opening remarks from senators emphasized the 2025 reauthorization of the program through AB 1207 and SB 840, and focused on whether CARB’s April revisions faithfully implement legislative intent while balancing climate ambition, affordability, leakage prevention, and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF). Several senators raised concerns that the proposal could reduce GGRF revenues, weaken funding for transit, affordable housing, wildfire prevention, drinking water, and other community programs, and shift too much support toward industry. Others stressed the need to protect businesses and consumers from higher costs and to avoid leakage and refinery closures. Senator Cortese’s statement, read into the record, warned that the proposal could jeopardize transportation funding commitments. CARB Chair Lauren Sanchez said the amendments respond to legislative direction and public comment, and described four main changes: increased electric bill credits, a larger manufacturing decarbonization incentive (MDI), additional compliance support for industry, and removal of post-2030 allowance allocations from the current rulemaking. She said the proposal keeps the cap aligned with 2030 and 2045 targets, maintains affordability protections, and is intended to reduce emissions while minimizing leakage and supporting in-state jobs. CARB staff also said the MDI would have guardrails, require applications and reporting, and be tied to emissions-reducing facility upgrades. The Department of Finance explained that GGRF revenue estimates are highly uncertain and are updated periodically based on auction data. The Legislative Analyst’s Office said the amendments are significant and could materially affect environmental ambition, industry support, utility credits, and GGRF revenues. LAO highlighted that the MDI could add allowances above the cap, potentially reducing certainty that 2030 targets will be met, and noted that the proposal appears to shift more allowances to industry and fewer to GGRF than current regulations. LAO also said the proposed GGRF estimate of about $8 billion through the decade could be insufficient to fully fund lower-priority tiers of programs. In questioning, senators pressed CARB on whether the proposal would raise consumer costs, whether free allowances or MDI funds would actually lower prices at the pump, how leakage is measured, and whether the Legislature’s budget assumptions would need to be revised before final action. No votes were taken during the hearing; the discussion was informational and focused on questioning CARB and fiscal staff ahead of the board’s planned May 28 consideration of the amendments.

Transcript Highlights:

• c><00:19:17.600> under<00:19:17.840> penalty<00:19:18.160> of simply make a statement
• under penalty of simply make a statement under penalty of perjury perjury perjury that<00:19:20.160>
• I just want to make a statement, which is that conversion therapy is predatory and it's fraudulent. >
• I just want to make a statement<00:55:48.160> which<00:55:48.400> is<00:55:48.559> that
• <00:55:49.200> cons<00:55:49.680> uh statement which is that cons uh statement which

Bills: HB1849, HB2000, HB1753, HB1511, HB276, HB1513, HB2188, HB1876

Keywords: licensing, professional license, individual taxpayer identification number, immigration, state residency, right to repair, wheelchairs, consumer protection, repair providers, device documentation, HB1753, Hawaii Social Media Data Deletion Act, social media, account deletion, data deletion, privacy, consumer privacy, personal information, sensitive personal information, data retention

Summary: The committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce met on February 10, 2026, and heard testimony on several bills. HB 1849 relating to licensing drew comments from DCCA’s Professional and Vocational Licensing Division and the Hawaii Real Estate Commission, both of which stood on written testimony. The Hawaii Coalition for Immigrant Rights testified in strong support, emphasizing that some immigrants, including DACA recipients, are already contributing in Hawaii and that the state should help create pathways for them to remain and advance professionally. No vote or final action was taken on HB 1849 during the portion shown. The committee then heard HB 2000, the wheelchair right-to-repair bill. Encart opposed the measure, arguing that repair delays are largely driven by insurance prior authorization and that wheelchair repairs involve FDA-regulated medical devices where improper repairs could create health risks. Peter Fritz testified in support, saying the bill was modeled on similar laws in other states and that he had personal experience through his sister’s use of a wheelchair. Members questioned whether repairs done outside insurer networks might not be reimbursed, and Fritz said that was a concern but that the need for timely repair outweighed it. The committee also discussed HB 1753 on social media, where DCCA’s Office of Consumer Protection supported the bill but suggested an amendment to the definition of personal information. On HB 1511 relating to consumer protection, DCCA’s Insurance Division supported the bill, while the Alliance for Automotive Innovation and the Hawaii Automobile Dealers Association offered comments seeking to preserve legitimate manufacturer and dealer communications about vehicles, warranties, recalls, and related services. The committee also took up HB 276 HD1 and HB 1513 on condominiums. The Hawaii Real Estate Commission offered comments on HB 276 HD1. For HB 1513, the Hawaii Green Infrastructure Authority supported the bill, but DCCA’s Insurance Division opposed it, warning that diverting HHRF funds could weaken reinsurance arrangements and raise premiums for consumers who rely on the fund. Members questioned whether the proposed condo loan program would need HHRF money and whether the amounts in the bill were necessary, and the division said it opposed using HHRF for that purpose. The committee also heard HB 2188 on housing, where OCP supported the measure and the Hawaii Association of Realtors raised concerns about conflicts with the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the use of tenant screening reports, noting that a working group is already addressing landlord-tenant issues. Members asked OCP to research how other states handle similar laws and whether additional language is needed to avoid federal conflict. Finally, on HB 1876 relating to mental health, the Department of Health’s Adult Mental Health Division supported the bill but said it remains opposed to harmful, non-evidence-based treatment modalities; Pride at Work Hawaii also testified in strong support. No final votes or committee decisions were reported in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• If we can just have a real short statement in regard to that, then I believe that would be all, and we
• Thank you very much for the statement. We do have one other question going to Senator Lanier.
• Seeing no questions, would you like to make a final statement?
• If they do have one, you don't believe that statement to be true?
• Thank you, and maybe this is more of a statement.

Transcript Highlights:

• It also imposes a criminal offense for intentionally or knowingly making a false statement.
• Would it benefit us if the title companies at closing had these people just sign a statement?
• Official fiscal impact statement. I mean, the reality is that it would expand the file.
• This bill would allow the Attorney General to demand internal records, compel sworn statements, and even
• Under this bill, the AG could demand sworn statements, detailed reports, or even testimony under oath

Bills: HB256, HCR19, HB256, HB1308, HB1554, HB1743, HB2308, HB2351, HB2858, HB3676, HB3784, HB4312, HB4552, HB4823, HB4852, HB5007, HB5010, HB5520, HB5524, HCR19

Keywords: severe weather, adaptation plan, vulnerability assessment, environmental protection, state agencies, federal agents, transparency, law enforcement, identification, public trust, immigration enforcement, HCR 19, Texas concurrent resolution, federal immigration enforcement, masked agents, facial coverings, visible identification, uniforms, badges, name tags

Transcript Highlights:

• And so, unfortunately, there's an old statement that I remember from Jim Robinson, who taught me, because
• I just had a few more statements. Thank you.
• In the last statement, word-for-word, all right, we can all see him.
• More effective than the other if a property owner brings in a closing statement. statement or market
• The chairman of that subcommittee had three statements: FEMA's not designed to be a first responder,

Bills: SB467, SB325, SB867, SB994, SB1052, SB1237, SB1449, SB1531, SB2063, SB2172, SB2173, SB2520, SB2529, SB2538, SB2541, SJR46, SJR84

Keywords: SB 467, Texas property tax, ad valorem tax, homestead exemption, residence homestead, fire damage, house fire, destroyed home, temporary tax relief, appraisal district, chief appraiser, local taxing unit, tax rollback, tax refund, Tax Code Chapter 11, prorated exemption, homestead improvement, disaster relief, property tax exemption, residential property

Transcript Highlights:

• What his statement was...
• There was a statement made previously, thank you, Mr.
• My prepared statement outlines these main points.
• I am in utter disbelief of your statement on that. Just... anyway, I am, because...
• My question was... you made the statement that you oppose things that are not meaningful coverage.

Bills: HB139, HB1818, HB1942, HB1959, HB2221, HB2254, HB2563, HB2067, HB2275, HB3211, HB139

Keywords: HB 1818, Texas Insurance Code, Texas Department of Insurance, commissioner of insurance, health maintenance organization, HMO, insurer, utilization review, preauthorization, prior authorization, medical necessity review, health care services, medical care, insurance regulation, insurance examination, regulatory oversight, confidential records, public information exception, Chapter 843, Chapter 1301

Transcript Highlights:

• But there's no purpose statement.
• <00:54:29.240> there's<00:54:29.480> no there's no purpose statement there's no there's
• no purpose statement there's no intent<00:54:30.520> laid<00:54:30.760> out<00:54:30.920
• And if it would help Chair Gomez to add a purpose statement, I would happily do that because the purpose
• <00:58:42.760> I chair Gomez to add a purpose statement I chair Gomez to add a purpose statement

Bills: HF4, HF173

Keywords: tax relief fund, budget surplus, surplus revenue, tax rebate, tax refund, one-time refund, income tax, property tax, constitutional amendment, Minnesota Constitution, general fund, budget reserve, taxpayer relief, state surplus, fiscal forecast, wealthy taxpayers, high-income exclusion, 2026 ballot, referendum, surplus distribution

Transcript Highlights:

• We look at audited statements of the districts and add all the numbers up.
• I do not think that that is an accurate statement.
• We roll this up, we can see this in their financial statements.
• So I think your statement is perfectly accurate two years ago.
• We have financial statements. In every, somewhere around. It's like 6,000, 5,000.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I now recognize Ranking Member Klobuchar for her opening statement. Thank you very much.
• Do you swear or affirm that the statement that you're about to provide is the truth, the whole truth,
• You can have a seat, and you're recognized for five minutes to give your opening statement.
• In your written statement, again, you alluded to the testimony that you just provided.
• I want to thank you and the Ranking Member for your opening statements, both of you.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm going to just make a short statement.
• I just want to make a quick statement before that roll call.
• Is that a fair statement?
• Is that fair statement?
• Madam Speaker, a debt limit statement for fiscal year 2027.

Keywords: 1064, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And for the civil penalty application and authorized mitigation for prompt good-faith statement of fatement
• And for the civil penalty application and authorized mitigation for prompt good-faith statement of fatement
• And for the civil penalty application and authorized mitigation for prompt good-faith statement of fatement
• And for the civil penalty application and authorized mitigation for prompt good-faith statement of fatement
• And for the civil penalty application and authorized mitigation for prompt good-faith statement of fatement

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard testimony on several bills related to bribery and public corruption. On SB 2249, which would increase penalties for bribery under certain circumstances, the Honolulu Prosecutor’s Office and Honolulu Police Department supported the measure, arguing that Hawaii’s current class B felony penalty is probationable and too weak to secure cooperation in corruption cases, especially after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Snyder decision narrowed federal bribery prosecutions. The Public Defender opposed the bill, arguing that elevating bribery to a class A felony and making it non-probationable was excessive, overbroad, and would remove judicial discretion. Multiple individuals also testified in support. Committee members questioned the prosecutor about removing deferred acceptance of plea provisions and asked HPD about the $20,000 threshold; the prosecutor said alternative charges could still be used in plea bargaining, and HPD said the threshold aligns with first-degree theft. The committee also discussed how current law tolls the bribery statute of limitations while an official remains in office, with the prosecutor explaining it can extend up to six years total. The committee then heard SB 2494, which would set a nine-year statute of limitations for bribery offenses. The Public Defender opposed the extension, saying the justification based on the length of federal investigations was too broad and that bribery already has a longer limitations period than most felonies. The Honolulu Prosecutor’s Office supported the bill, saying bribery cases often involve coordination with federal investigators, that federal and state evidence-gathering methods may differ, and that a longer period would help ensure admissible evidence and allow state prosecution when federal law no longer applies. Members asked whether there were public examples of cases lost to the current limitations period; the prosecutor said he was not aware of any publicly available examples, but maintained nine years was a reasonable period. The committee also considered SB 2737, which would create a misdemeanor for failure by a state or county elected official to report bribery. The Department of the Attorney General offered comments and suggested changing the term to “public servant” for consistency with existing law. The Honolulu Prosecutor’s Office supported the intent but warned the reporting requirement could create Fifth Amendment issues for witnesses who might otherwise be useful in grand jury proceedings. The bill drew broad public support, with 33 supporters and no opposition noted. Finally, the committee took up SB 3071, which revises sex trafficking and promoting prostitution statutes by redefining “profits from prostitution” and adding an affirmative defense for certain lawful transactions. The Public Defender opposed the measure, saying it still could reach people without the required criminal intent and that the affirmative defense language could be applied unevenly. The Attorney General and Honolulu Prosecutor supported the bill, saying it better addresses concerns raised by the State v. Ibarra decision while closing loopholes that allow traffickers to disguise profits as loans or gifts. The prosecutor emphasized that traffickers are sophisticated and can structure transactions to evade current law.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:50:31.839> I<00:50:32.160> just >> Simply because of the statement I just
• >> Simply because of the statement I just made. made. made.
• >> The<00:50:33.359> statement<00:50:33.520> I<00:50:33.760> was >>
• The statement I was >> The statement I was >> they<00:50:34.160> move<00:50:34.400
• statements just generalize more<01:42:54.159> training<01:42:54.560> so<01:42:54.719><

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The senator must subsequently file a statement with the Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board
• describing what happened in that circumstance, and that statement must be filed within one week.
• describing the matter written statement describing the matter uh<00:03:52.879> requiring<00:03
• The senator must subsequently file<00:04:39.759> a<00:04:39.919> statement<00:04:40.160
• Um, and then I will have some closing statements. Uh, I am David Z.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Is that a fair statement?
• Is that a fair statement 26 million registered vehicles throughout the state 254 County tax assessors
• Okay, so it's a policy statement, not an actual regulation that was promulgated. Is that correct?
• But and I'm going to read you a couple of these statements.
• With the existence of, and the issuance of your policy statement from this morning, it's effectively

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Do you recognize those statements?
• Do you recognize those statements? Senator Boldon.
• <01:01:48.680> I where those statements were made. I where those statements were made.
• statements that you've made in the past. statements that you've made in the past.
• That's why I brought up the statements that Senator Boldon has made.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• In fact, it would include witness statement recanting as well.
• In fact, it would include witness statement recanting as well.
• In fact, it would include witness statement recanting as well.
• In fact, it would include witness statement recanting as well.
• In fact, it would include witness statement recanting as well.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee first took up Senate Bill 268, a bill related to biological sex and related classifications. Members opposing the bill argued it was unnecessary, poorly drafted, and a personal attack on a small group of people, while supporters said it was needed to protect girls and women and to avoid repeated floor debate on a measure they viewed as proper. Several members also discussed the bill’s definition of biological sex, the lack of guidance on what information could be required to make determinations, and concerns about unintended consequences. The committee voted on a motion to retain the bill and approved it by a 10-8 roll call vote, with the bill retained. The committee then moved to Senate Bill 189, described by supporters as a housekeeping measure requested by the Secretary of State and the Department of Health and Human Services concerning fetal death records. Supporters said the bill was narrow, time-sensitive, and ready to pass, while opponents argued it needed further work and that the committee should not use retention to reopen the bill for broader changes. Some members said they wanted to add or explore additional provisions related to fetal death reporting, while others objected that such changes were outside the bill’s scope and poor procedure. After debate, the committee voted to retain Senate Bill 189 as well.

Transcript Highlights:

• office and so on about how this is actually going to fulfill that very statement of our... possible
• from the governor's office and statement from the governor's office and so<01:00:05.400> on<01
• Quickly—yeah, I can’t— but agree with your statements.
• Quickly—yeah, I can’t— but agree with your statements.
• of need and reasonableness statement of need and reasonableness which<01:31:52.760> we<01:31:

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That's >> Oh, I'd love to make a statement.
• It'd be nice to make a statement if you could.
• <04:37:02.000> of I provided for you were statements of I provided for you were statements
• than a technology mission statement than a technology type. type. type.
• that statement right there says it all. that statement right there says it all.

Keywords: 1189, house, all