Transcript Highlights:

• And so, unfortunately, this is an increasing risk to our communities.
• We believe in the communities that we work in and serve.
• But as I'm listening to you talk, and I live in a community that is incredibly dense with rental properties
• But as I'm listening to you talk, and I live in a community that is incredibly dense with rental properties
• , lease properties.

Summary: The Consumer Protection and Business Committee held public hearings on three Senate bills. SB 5831, the Uniform Mortgage Modification Act, was explained by staff as creating safe harbors so certain mortgage modifications would not alter lien priority or require re-recording; the prime sponsor said it would reduce uncertainty and legal costs. No one testified on the bill. SB 6091, concerning real estate brokers marketing residential properties to exclusive groups, was described as requiring concurrent public marketing when brokers market to limited groups, while allowing private marketing so long as the public also has access; the sponsor and supporters said it would promote fair, open housing markets and reduce pocket listings that can reinforce exclusion. SB 6178, prohibiting post-loss assignment of benefits in property insurance, was presented as protecting homeowners after disasters from signing away policy rights to contractors; the sponsor, the Office of the Insurance Commissioner, the National Insurance Crime Bureau, and the Washington State Association for Justice supported the bill, while discussion focused on whether the $50,000 penalty should distinguish between intentional and unintentional violations. For SB 6178, the Office of the Insurance Commissioner said it has seen more complaints about policyholders being pressured to sign documents before contacting insurers and said the bill would help keep homeowners in control of claims. Testifiers emphasized that contractors play an important role in repairs but should not take over first-party insurance claims, and one witness noted the bill would not prevent direct payment arrangements to contractors. Committee members asked about penalties and whether a cooling-off period or other alternatives might address concerns about good-faith contractors. For SB 6091, supporters including Zillow, Washington Realtors, Habitat for Humanity, Windermere, and the Fair Housing Center of Washington argued that exclusive or pocket listings can reduce transparency, limit competition, and worsen housing inequities. They said the bill still allows private marketing and open houses, but requires public availability as well, and does not force owners to allow access to their property. A rental housing representative asked for an amendment to remove a reference to leases, saying the bill should not unintentionally apply to rental providers who are not brokers. The committee closed public hearings on all three bills and ended the meeting with birthday recognition for two members.

Transcript Highlights:

• , or Mount Zion Baptist Church, owns a lot of property that represents more than just real property to
• But once you start parceling out property, the land, then what happens to that religious community?
• while property gets sold to people who are not from that community.
• The faith communities are embedded in their communities.
• I would like to share an example of what can happen to the larger community when a faith community takes

Summary: House Finance heard testimony on two affordable housing bills. House Bill 1859 would expand an existing density bonus for housing on religious organization property by lowering the affordability threshold from 100% to at least 50% affordable units, requiring local policies to implement the bonus upon request, and creating a new state and local sales and use tax exemption for qualifying projects with at least 50% affordable units maintained for 10 years. The sponsor and supporters said the bill would help projects on church-owned land pencil out amid high construction and financing costs, while a county association raised concern that the bill would create an unfunded mandate for local planning departments. Several witnesses also asked that homeownership projects be explicitly included, and staff confirmed the exemption would be administered through an exemption certificate. The committee then moved to House Bill 1717, which would authorize cities and counties to create a local sales and use tax remittance program for affordable housing developments. Staff said the remittance would cover 100% of local taxes paid after project completion, with a 50% affordable housing threshold and 40-year affordability requirement, and the sponsor and local government and housing advocates supported it as a flexible tool to reduce development costs. Testifiers generally backed both bills, with some asking for more flexibility on income targeting and clarification on county-city interactions under HB 1717. No votes were taken; both public hearings were closed and the committee adjourned after a separate work session on the Working Families Tax Credit, where advocates urged broader eligibility, higher benefit amounts, and easier access, and a California researcher described data-linking methods used to improve tax credit take-up.

Transcript Highlights:

• Existing property tax law already provides that the property tax base-year value of real property that
• Without recorded property transfers, homeowners are ineligible to qualify for these property tax exemptions
• SB 293 also prevents property owners from retroactive reassessment if the property owner meets the following
• has a clear title to the property; and three, the property meets criteria for an intergenerational transfer
• SB 293 also prevents property owners from retroactive reassessment if the property owner meets the following

Committee: House Revenue and Taxation

Summary: The Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee met after several delays while the Senate remained in session. Once convened, the chair welcomed new committee member Assembly Member Juan Carrillo and explained hearing procedures, including that bills with significant fiscal impacts would generally be sent to suspense. SB 87 was the only bill designated for an immediate vote; the rest were heard for discussion and then referred to suspense. The committee heard several tax-related measures. SB 359 would clarify that county-run transit systems qualify for existing fuel tax exemptions for public transit operators; it drew support from the County of Placer, the California Transit Association, and CSAC, and was sent to suspense. SB 603 would allow county boards in disaster-affected counties to extend the five-year replacement property deadline by up to three years; it was supported by the Assessors Association and the California Association of Realtors and also sent to suspense. SB 293 would extend deadlines and protect intergenerational property transfers for disaster-impacted homeowners, especially in Altadena after the Eaton Fire; it received strong support from the California Community Foundation and committee members, and was referred to suspense after the author agreed to work on refinements. The committee also heard SB 353, which would extend the farm-to-food-bank tax credit for five more years; it was supported by Californians Against Waste and sent to suspense. SB 723 would raise the threshold for local property tax exemptions on low-value properties to reduce administrative burden on small businesses, and was likewise referred to suspense. SB 785 would create a $5,000 tax credit for durable medical equipment for medically fragile children; it drew support from pediatric home health and provider groups and was sent to suspense. SB 87, which would extend the sales tax exemption for volunteer fire department fundraising activities, was the only bill voted on and passed the committee 5-0 to Appropriations.

Transcript Highlights:

• creating affordability in our community.
• It protects folks in their residential properties and that they shouldn't be unfairly hit with the property
• Affected the property, but the use remains.
• How does it affect ag properties?
• A typical up zone would be you have an R1 property. You can only put one unit on R1 property.

Committee: Senate Senate Tax, Business & Transportation

Transcript Highlights:

• Community stability.
• to freely sell their property.
• I'm a real estate broker and I'm the CEO of Bright Idea Properties, a property management and realty
• You're also taking my property rights away, not allowing me to market or sell my communities to any buyer
• Property rights matter.

Bills: HF1143 , HF1548 , HF1340 , HF2549 , HF2559 , HF1673 , HF2740 , HF2507 , HF2461 , HF2381 , HF2695

Committee: House Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• In our communities.
• Senator, I know that the bill deals with abandoned properties, multi-family dwellings in our communities
• , protect the community, and to make the property safe.
• COMMUNITY, AND TO MAKE THE PROPERTY SAFE.
• But we all understand, because we have seen that there are zombie properties in our communities that

Summary: The Senate opened with routine formalities, approved the journal, welcomed a SkillsUSA student delegation, and then moved into budget and policy business. The chamber accepted a Rules Committee report and took up a supplemental budget extender, Senate Print 9963, which would extend state operations through April 22 and authorize $12.7 billion, including about $5.1 billion in new funding for Medicaid, payroll, and school aid. Senator O’Mara questioned the delay in the budget, the lack of public detail, and unresolved issues such as CLCPA changes, auto insurance, and SEQR reforms; the sponsor said negotiations were ongoing and that school aid would likely build on the executive budget. The extender passed 57-1, with Senator Weik voting no. The Senate then adopted Senate Resolution 1887, sponsored by Senator Brisport, memorializing the Governor to proclaim April 2026 as Arab American Heritage Month. Senators Brisport, Fahy, Salazar, and Gounardes spoke in support, emphasizing Arab Americans’ cultural, civic, and economic contributions in New York and condemning anti-Arab and anti-Muslim bias. The resolution was adopted by voice vote and opened for co-sponsorship. The chamber next considered several bills on the calendar, including a bill by Senator Cleare to prohibit state-chartered financial institutions from investing in private correctional facilities. Supporters framed it as a moral response to private prisons and rising federal use of detention facilities, while opponents argued it would overregulate state-chartered banks and affect private investment decisions. The bill passed 36-22. The Senate also passed a bill by Senator Krueger raising the nonprofit lobbying disclosure threshold from $5,000 to $10,000, after debate over transparency and whether the change would reduce oversight; it passed 35-23. Finally, the Senate passed Senator May’s bill on advanced transmission technologies and utility planning, after extensive debate over ratepayer costs, battery storage, and data center growth; supporters said it could lower energy costs through more efficient grid use, while opponents said it would raise rates and duplicate existing studies. The bill passed after being restored to the non-controversial calendar.

Transcript Highlights:

• She's the Acting Executive Director of the Office of Community Partnerships and Strategic Communications
• Office of Community Partnerships and Strategic Communications.
• The Office of Community Partnerships and Strategic Communications, known as OCPSC, uses a data-driven
• properties.
• [David Young, BOE Property Tax Deputy Director] Advantageous Prop. 13 property tax base.

Summary: The subcommittee first heard an informational overview from the Governor’s Office of Service and Community Engagement (GoServe), including California Volunteers, the Office of Community Partnerships and Strategic Communications, and the Youth Empowerment Commission. GoServe reported strong participation in programs such as California Service Corps, College Corps, Youth Service Corps, Climate Action Corps, and the new men’s service challenge. Testimony emphasized enrollment, retention, and completion outcomes, outreach results, and efforts to reduce administrative costs. The Department of Finance said the administration supports the programs but has already made reductions to help address the budget deficit, while the LAO said it had no new recommendations on the informational item. Committee members raised questions about program scale, demographics, and effectiveness, especially for Climate Action Corps and whether the programs are duplicative of existing volunteer opportunities. One member criticized the programs as too fragmented and costly, while others asked for more data on who is being served and whether the programs increase actual participation in state services. GoServe said it would follow up with demographic and regional impact information. The committee also discussed the men’s service challenge, which GoServe said has formed partnerships with organizations such as YMCAs and Big Brothers Big Sisters and has already attracted more than 2,000 participants. The item was informational only. The committee then heard a BOE overview and a budget request to implement SB 293, which gives wildfire-affected families additional time to claim intergenerational Prop. 13 property tax transfers. BOE requested $154,000 for guidance, public materials, and inquiry response, explaining that the work is urgent and tied to disaster relief in Los Angeles County, especially Altadena. The LAO had no concerns, and Finance had no comment. Members asked how many cases might be affected and whether more funding would be needed later; BOE said the full number is not yet known and that future requests are possible. The committee also heard BOE’s IT modernization proposal for the state-assessed property tax system, a 30-year-old mainframe replacement costing $3.2 million in 2026-27 and $3.1 million in 2027-28. BOE and Finance supported the project as necessary, while the LAO said it had no concerns but urged a high bar for new IT spending. Members generally supported modernization but cautioned about implementation risk. Finally, CDTFA presented an overview and two policy proposals. The department described administering 42 tax and fee programs, collecting $98 billion in FY 2024, and improving administrative efficiency. Members then discussed local sales tax tools and revenue-sharing agreements, with concerns raised about transparency, consultant-driven tax allocation disputes, and the impact on local communities. CDTFA and the LAO explained that local jurisdictions control how district sales tax revenues are spent and noted the Legislature could revisit the statutory cap on local add-on sales taxes. The committee then heard CDTFA’s proposal to treat all delivery network companies as marketplace facilitators so they must collect and remit sales tax on delivery-app orders. CDTFA said the change would resolve confusion, shift compliance from thousands of small restaurants to a few large platforms, and raise about $44 million annually. Several members questioned whether the proposal would effectively raise consumer costs and whether it would create a competitive advantage or disadvantage among delivery platforms. The item remained under discussion, with no vote taken in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> communities where no common property communities where no common property exists<00:14:09.519><c
• <c> elect</c> Community rules these communities elect Community rules these communities elect boards<
• </c> property surrounded by private property property surrounded by private property on<00:24:06.600>
• They're a tool to ensure compliance with community rules that protect property values and quality of
• Sustainable community.

Committee: House Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• that one property owner, the adjacent properties to that 1,000 acres is where the setback line would
• Well, when you say a retirement community, it’s a family property. A house, a building.”
• I see, but I have wetlands on my property. I have floodplain on my property.
• This is phase one of the property.
• also have property rights.

Committee: House Utilities

Summary: The committee first took up House Committee Substitute for House Bills 21, 22, and 1626, which would combine the bills and add a clawback/refund provision for construction work in progress in base rates if costs were imprudently incurred or a project is not placed in service in a reasonable time. Supporters argued Missouri should remove its CWIP ban to stay competitive with neighboring states and attract utility investment, while opponents warned about unknown costs and timelines for ratepayers. The substitute was adopted, and the committee voted the combined bill do pass by 12 ayes and 7 noes. The committee then considered House Bill 2711, as amended by a substitute, dealing with broadband-related property tax treatment. The sponsor explained the substitute narrowed the bill to new installations, added a seven-year sunset, and aimed to clarify assessment issues. Supporters said the measure would help expand broadband infrastructure and improve service in underserved areas, while opponents argued the tax break should not apply to upgrades within existing service territories and questioned whether the bill truly expanded access. The committee adopted the substitute and voted the bill do pass by 12 ayes and 7 noes. The remainder of the hearing focused on House Bill 2762, a broad solar/wind/water measure. The sponsor described provisions setting a $2,500 per megawatt tax on solar nameplate capacity, creating more uniform assessment rules, establishing setbacks for solar facilities, limiting eminent domain use, and including smaller sections on water district dissolution and wind turbine lighting. Testimony was mixed: solar developers, Clean Grid Alliance, Renew Missouri, and Missouri Farm Bureau supported clearer rules, grandfathering, and setbacks they viewed as reasonable, while landowners and local residents raised concerns about property rights, transparency, runoff, glare, noise, and the impact of large solar projects on neighboring farms and homes. No final action on HB 2762 was taken in the portion provided, but the chair said a committee substitute would be developed to address the solar issues more comprehensively.

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Miller: Sorry, not property taxes.
• They went through the amount of property tax.
• Nobody wants property taxes.
• Property insurance is tripling and doubling.
• The property tax committee that was assembled.

Transcript Highlights:

• with a disability and away from homestead resort property and on to all other properties.
• not shift property tax burden onto other property taxpayers.
• </c> onto other property taxpayers. onto other property taxpayers.
• </c> the Community of Minnesota Resorts. the Community of Minnesota Resorts.
• Community of Minnesota Resorts. I'm a Community of Minnesota Resorts.

Committee: Senate Taxes

Transcript Highlights:

• the properties they own.
• We have nice communities.
• We have nice communities.
• property insurance.
• </c> property the community that you're property the community that you're offering<01:39:08.280><c>

Committee: Senate Housing and Homelessness Prevention

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:07:14.720><c> please</c> more information to communicate please more information to communicate
• uh Community community benefits assess uh Community benefits<01:48:09.320><c> reports</c><01:48:10.320
• c> there</c><03:50:27.080><c> is</c> property uh delineated property there is property uh delineated
• taxation within the community.
• </c> property and the nature of the property property and the nature of the property such<04:42:33.440

Committee: House Municipal and County Government

Transcript Highlights:

• property property taxes<00:05:02.479><c> uh</c><00:05:02.600><c> nearby</c><00:05:03.120><c> posts</
• </c> isolation we need social communication isolation we need social communication as<00:07:56.479><c
• </c> free um we also use those as community free um we also use those as community centers<00:10:40.360
• </c><00:13:17.240><c> thank</c> service to the community thank service to the community thank you<00:
• </c> tool for the community tool for the community I<00:14:59.320><c> must</c><00:14:59.560><c> also<

Transcript Highlights:

• The get is that it was blighted property. It was nothing. There was no property tax.
• property... ...electricity costs primarily along residential streets and community parks through the
• Those property owners that have properties prior to 2015, when the LPV got reset, the majority of property
• properties that have been held for some time or is that on brand new properties or is that on properties
• Those property owners that have properties prior to 2015 when the LPV got reset, the majority of property

Committee: Senate Senate Finance Committee of Reference

Summary: The committee approved the February 2, 2026 minutes and held Senate Bill 1090. It then took up SB 1503, which would require pension fiduciaries and proxy advisory firms to base voting and advice solely on economic interests, prohibit ESG or ideological considerations except in limited circumstances, and authorize attorney general enforcement. The sponsor said the bill was meant to protect investors and align with federal action; supporters argued proxy advisors lack transparency and can influence votes against shareholders’ financial interests. Arizona retirement system representatives said they were neutral but warned the bill would add major operational costs, create reporting burdens, increase litigation risk, and could narrow the market for proxy advisory services. The committee passed SB 1503 on a 4-3 vote. The committee then considered SB 1293, which would bar GPLET abatements from applying to school-district revenue during the eight-year abatement period. Supporters said the bill would protect school funding and reduce the state aid backfill tied to GPLET projects, while opponents from Phoenix, Mesa, and economic development groups said GPLET is a key redevelopment tool that helps finance downtown and blighted-area projects and that the bill would weaken future investment. The committee adopted the amendment and passed SB 1293 on a 4-3 vote. It also heard and passed SB 1414, which gives insurers 30 days to review and respond to third-party settlement demands; insurers supported the bill as a reasonable commercial timeframe, while trial lawyers opposed it as too slow and urged a 15-day standard, with members indicating they expected a possible friendly amendment. Next, the committee heard SB 1633, which would create an Arizona income tax subtraction for capital gains from the sale of a primary residence, after five years of occupancy. Opponents argued it would mainly benefit wealthy homeowners and could cost the state tens of millions annually, while the sponsor said it could help homeowners move without facing large tax bills and improve housing turnover. The committee passed the bill 4-2. It also adopted an amendment to SB 1429, which would have expanded Arizona Commerce Authority board ex officio membership, then held the bill for further consideration. Finally, the committee passed SB 1536, allowing temporary consolidation of street light improvement districts, and heard SB 1724, which clarifies when property splits or consolidations trigger limited property value recalculation, with county assessors supporting the measure as an anti-gaming reform.

Transcript Highlights:

• Churches have property on their church lot that they're using for community-oriented programs to give
• Churches have property on their church lot that they're using for community-oriented programs to give
• Churches have property on their church lot that they're using for community-oriented programs to give
• Churches have property on their church lot that they're using for community-oriented programs to give
• Churches have property on their church lot that they're using for community-oriented programs to give

Summary: The Ways and Means Committee held a public hearing on Senate Bill 291, which would update religious land-use and property tax exemption rules for church-owned parsonages, parish houses, and similar properties. Senator Tim Lang, speaking for the sponsor, said the bill was intended to address situations where former parsonages are no longer occupied by clergy and are instead used for church-related purposes such as housing staff, religious education, or congregate living tied to ministry, including addiction recovery. He emphasized that the bill was not meant to create commercial rental housing and that it also preserves reasonable zoning and environmental regulations. Committee members pressed the sponsor on how the bill would be applied, especially the meaning of “religious purposes,” the six-unit limit, the “same lot” language, and whether churches could use the exemption to rent units for revenue. The sponsor said the six-unit cap was added to prevent large-scale commercial rental use, that congregate housing would be limited and defined, and that the bill was meant to cover uses like substance abuse recovery, homes for unwed mothers, and religious education, but not apartments converted for ordinary rental. He also said churches would still file annual exemption paperwork and towns could challenge claims they believed were commercial. Questions also raised concerns about whether the bill treated religious and nonreligious housing trusts differently; the sponsor responded that the bill was aimed at church-owned property used in pursuit of a religious mission. Several witnesses testified in support. Representative Mark Pearson, an active clergyman, said the bill would not remove additional property from the tax rolls because clergy housing allowances typically lead clergy to buy taxable homes elsewhere, while the church-owned parsonage remains exempt. Nick Taylor of Housing Action New Hampshire supported the bill as a modest expansion that could help create more attainable housing by allowing better use of existing religious land and structures, though he noted his organization would support even broader use. The hearing ended without a vote or final action, and the chair closed questions after the testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• You have rising property taxes because your community is losing a population base, and meanwhile you
• You have rising property taxes because your community is losing a population base, and meanwhile you
• This challenge is largely due to STMA being a property-poor community with limited commercial and industrial
• This challenge is largely due to STMA being a property-poor community with limited commercial and industrial
• This challenge is largely due to STMA being a property-poor community with limited commercial and industrial

Committee: Senate Education Finance

Transcript Highlights:

• Property tax, personal property tax on farm equipment, for example, would have this same kind of shift
• , we want that community to realize a lasting economic benefit.
• We want that community to realize a lasting economic benefit.
• Is this the right thing to do for their community?
• And those downsides are different in different communities.

Summary: House Finance heard briefings on several tax and housing-related bills, including HB 1717 on a local sales and use tax remittance program for affordable housing, HB 1859 on expanding density bonuses for housing on religious organization property, HB 1960 on a renewable energy excise tax, HB 2133 on making a senior citizen center property tax exemption permanent, HB 2135 on extending a disabled veterans housing sales tax preference, HB 2140 on tax treatment for land transferred to government entities, HB 2442 on a broad package of local tax and levy changes, and HB 2559 on a local option short-term rental tax for affordable housing. Staff also described multiple proposed substitutes and amendments, many of them technical or aimed at shifting administrative duties, changing tax credits, or requiring voter approval. In executive session, the committee adopted a substitute for HB 1717 and reported it out unanimously with a due pass recommendation. HB 1859 was also reported out with a due pass recommendation after members discussed added flexibility for affordable housing on faith-owned land. For HB 1960, the committee adopted amendments clarifying tax administration and JLARC review, rejected an amendment that would have adjusted property tax levies to offset shifts, and then advanced the bill on an 11-4 vote. HB 2133 and HB 2135 both received technical amendments and were reported out unanimously, with members emphasizing the value of permanent or extended tax preferences for senior centers and disabled veterans. The committee then advanced HB 2140, which narrows tax consequences when land is transferred to a governmental entity and is used for current-use purposes, with members describing it as a fix for unintended burdens on landowners and farmers. HB 2442, a large local government finance package, drew the most debate; amendments to make new taxes credits against state taxes and to require voter approval were rejected, and the bill passed 9-6. HB 2559, which would allow a local option excise tax on short-term rentals to fund affordable housing, also saw rejected amendments on state tax credits, local control, and voter approval before passing 9-6. Throughout, supporters framed the bills as tools for local governments and affordable housing, while opponents argued they would increase taxes and should require direct voter approval or state offsets.

Transcript Highlights:

• and lessee of the property.
• real property.
• , not real property.
• , not real property.
• the property owner to make.

Bills: SB6114 , SB6244

Committee: House Finance

Keywords: excise tax, definitions, tax law, taxation, fixtures, affixed, tax exemption, agriculture, hazardous substances, crop protection, warehousing

Transcript Highlights:

• and lessee of the property.
• real property.
• , not real property.
• the property owner to make.
• the property owner to make.

Summary: House Finance met on February 26 and heard several tax and housing-related bills. Substitute Senate Bill 6343 would extend the deadline to apply for a property tax exemption for improvements to single-family homes damaged by natural disasters, with sponsors citing recent flooding and the need to help displaced homeowners in multiple counties. Local officials from Kent and Algona testified in support, describing flood damage and ongoing recovery needs. The bill was heard but no vote was taken. Senate Bill 6347 would roll back the higher estate tax rates enacted in 2025, while leaving the higher exemption amount in place. Committee staff said the bill would reduce revenue to the Education Legacy Trust account by about $44.8 million starting in fiscal year 2027 and about $389.9 million over the 2027-29 biennium. Supporters argued the higher rates could harm family businesses and encourage wealthy residents to leave; opponents said the bill would mainly benefit very large estates and would worsen budget pressures by reducing funds for education and child care. Public testimony was mixed, and the bill was heard without action. The committee also heard Senate Bill 6244, which would extend a hazardous substance tax exemption for agricultural crop protection products stored in Washington for out-of-state sale until 2038. The sponsor and a logistics witness said the exemption helps farmers get products faster, supports regional distribution, and improves competitiveness; staff said the revenue impact would be small. Finally, Senate Bill 6114 would define “fixture” and “affixed” for real estate excise tax purposes to make tax treatment of attached property clearer, and Senate Bill 6027 would broaden allowable uses of several local affordable housing funding sources, including rehabilitation and operations of existing housing, rental assistance in some counties, and expanded uses for Affordable Housing for All grants. Both of those bills drew support from state and local housing officials and advocates, and the committee adjourned after the hearings with no recorded votes.