Transcript Highlights:

• Did LeadingAge Washington support or oppose the bill of rights when it was proposed in the past?
• I believe that we were in support. I can't remember exactly how we had testified or signed in.
• We are here in excited support of this bill.
• We're in support of all of those things.
• The 1,200 members of WACRA support 2299, and we hope you will too. Thank you. Great. Thank you.

Bills: HB2299, HB2118, HB2236

Keywords: seniors, independent living, ombudsman, elderly support, continuing care retirement communities, common interest communities, restrictions, property rights, homeowners association, community governance, housing finance, affordable housing, housing commission, state agency, financial assistance, 904, all

Summary: The House Housing Committee held a public hearing on House Bill 2299, which would create a state senior independent living ombuds program. Staff explained that the bill would direct the Department of Commerce to contract with a nonprofit to provide ombuds services for residents of senior independent living facilities, including complaint handling, data collection, referrals, training, and protections against retaliation and disclosure. The bill also sets qualifications and conflict-of-interest rules for ombuds and requires facilities to post notice of the service. The chair said the committee would not move the bill out of committee that day because amendments were still being worked on. Representative Christine Reeves, the bill’s sponsor, said the measure is intended to fill a gap for seniors in independent living facilities, which are currently treated under multifamily housing law rather than senior housing protections. She described constituent complaints involving delayed maintenance, safety concerns, and lack of response from management, and said the ombuds would provide a trusted expert resource without changing building codes or broader housing classifications. Committee members asked about the bill’s scope, including whether it would apply to 55-plus communities, condominiums, and mixed-use facilities, and staff explained the bill’s definition of covered facilities. Testimony was mixed. The Washington Health Care Association and LeadingAge Washington supported the goal but raised concerns about funding, program scope, and how the new ombuds would interact with existing landlord-tenant law and long-term care ombuds services; they urged a broader stakeholder process and said the Legislature should first clarify resident rights. The Washington State Long-Term Care Ombuds Program strongly supported the bill, saying it would address inequities for residents in mixed communities and could potentially be folded into existing ombuds work, though it would require additional resources. Residents and advocates also testified in support, describing communication problems, safety issues, and the need for a neutral outside authority. The committee closed the hearing without taking a vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• We are here to testify in support of the Stem Cell Freedom Act.
• Um, we are very much in support of this bill.
• Um there are support of this bill.
• Um, not real knowledgeable about the subject, but we do support it.
• So, we're in support of this the state.

Bills: HB0003, HB0117, HB0041

Keywords: pregnancy centers, abortion, pro-life, healthcare, women's rights, state regulation, civil rights, freedom of speech, informed consent, civil liability, coercion, healthcare rights, law enforcement, death benefits, retirement, survivor support, public safety, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I would urge your support.
• I would urge your support. I would urge your support. >> Definitely.
• </c> and do not support the coercion claim. and do not support the coercion claim.
• </c> fear, coercion, and lack of support fear, coercion, and lack of support often<01:37:18.400><c> are
• </c> &gt;&gt; um provide after abortion support. &gt;&gt; um provide after abortion support.

Bills: HB0003, HB0117, HB0041

Keywords: pregnancy centers, abortion, pro-life, healthcare, women's rights, state regulation, civil rights, freedom of speech, informed consent, civil liability, coercion, healthcare rights, law enforcement, death benefits, retirement, survivor support, public safety, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Testimony is given on green cards for support, red cards for opposition, and white cards for information
• We also have a green card in support, and I wish to speak. Ms. Posey's here.
• Posey had a green card in to support, not wishing to speak. All right. Sorry.
• Next is Senate Bill 18, municipal employee retiree. All right, I'll have staff read in 18.
• DPSC retirees to return to work in critical positions one year after retirement.

Bills: SB8, SB10, SB11, SB12, SB13, SB14, SB16, SB17, SB18, SB20, SB21, SB22, SB416, SB455, SB456, SB477

Keywords: Municipal Employees' Retirement System, Louisiana, participation, employer, retirement, SB 10, Act 222, Louisiana State Police Retirement System, state police retirement, retirement system funding, employer contributions, actuarial gains, amortization, Permanent Benefit Increase, PBI account, benefit increase reserve, supplemental permanent benefit increase, public retirement systems, state pension, pension funding

Summary: The Retirement Committee met on April 29, 2026, established a quorum, and heard a series of retirement-related bills, mostly cleanup or technical measures affecting various public retirement systems. SB 22 would extend Municipal Employees Retirement System eligibility to certain positions in the Second City Court constable’s office in New Orleans. SB 17 would create a funding deposit account for cost-of-living adjustments for registrars of voters’ employees’ retirement system. SB 455 would allow certain district and parish courts to participate in the Parochial Employees Retirement System. SB 456 would update compensation rules for assigned retired judges, and SB 8 would add the Louisiana Asset Management Pool as a participating employer in MERS. All of these bills were described as aligning statutes with current practice or expanding participation options, and each was reported favorably without objection. The committee also heard several Louisiana State Police retirement bills. SB 10 would repeal outdated priority allocation and retiree raise rules and adjust handling of surplus employee contributions; SB 11 would increase the funding cap for benefit increases from 2.5% to 3.5%; and SB 12 would update membership and definition language to reflect the State Police Commission rather than the Civil Service Commission. SB 18 would repeal a special exception allowing certain MERS retirees to return to part-time work while collecting full benefits, while protecting roughly 30 current participants. SB 20 and SB 21 would update actuarial gain/loss and unfunded liability funding rules for school employees’ retirement and LASERS, respectively, in light of the new permanent benefit increase funding structure. Each of these bills was supported by system officials as cleanup or modernization measures and was reported favorably. The committee spent the most time on education and return-to-work issues for teachers and public employees. SB 16 would reduce annual trustee training requirements for retirement system boards from 16 hours back to 12 hours, which witnesses said would better fit smaller systems and match the original intent of the law. SB 13 would similarly update TRSL’s actuarial funding rules after the sunset of the experience account. SB 14, based on a 2025 study work group, would consolidate and simplify TRSL return-to-work rules and expand options for retired teachers, with witnesses emphasizing teacher shortages and the need to retain experienced educators. All three were reported favorably. Finally, SB 416 would allow certain Department of Public Safety and Corrections retirees to return to critical shortage positions after one year, and SB 477 would classify the chairman of the Louisiana Gaming Control Board as a full-time state employee for retirement purposes. Both bills drew questions and discussion, especially SB 416, and both were reported favorably. The chair announced the committee’s next meeting would be moved from Monday to Tuesday, and the meeting adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Nelson, for being here and for your support of the bill.
• Again, we're always in this discussion on child support.
• But in Minnesota, child support is a very important issue.
• So yes, child support is based... the child support amount is based on a set of guidelines.
• I hope there will be ongoing support for this bill. Thank you.

Bills: HF2233, HF1524, HF1893, HF1396, HF2456, HF2959, HF2300, HF2412, HF3022, HF2825, HF1862, HF1373, HF1039, HF3070

Keywords: Uniform Special Deposits Act, special deposit, banking law, financial institutions, escrow, escrow account, trust account, security deposit, beneficiary, depositor, creditor process, garnishment, attachment, levy, setoff, recoupment, financial market infrastructure, retirement benefits, compensation, earnest money

Transcript Highlights:

• I just don't feel I can support this today. So thank you.
• This office will help support level.
• Is there any member any member support?
• </c><00:51:10.480><c> based</c> use treatment, and other supports based use treatment, and other supports
• Um your support of our bill statewide.

Bills: HF2233, HF1524, HF1893, HF1396, HF2456, HF2959, HF2300, HF2412, HF3022, HF2825, HF1862, HF1373, HF1039, HF3070

Keywords: Uniform Special Deposits Act, special deposit, banking law, financial institutions, escrow, escrow account, trust account, security deposit, beneficiary, depositor, creditor process, garnishment, attachment, levy, setoff, recoupment, financial market infrastructure, retirement benefits, compensation, earnest money

Transcript Highlights:

• I appreciate again the support, the discussion that we had, and Representative Thinky's support of this
• </c><00:12:05.880><c> this</c> one I I just really can't support this one I I just really can't support
• </c><00:51:25.520><c> program</c> support how the child support program support how the child support
• </c><00:51:50.119><c> case</c> parties who have a child support case parties who have a child support
• </c> the person who owes the child support the person who owes the child support and<00:53:30.280><c>

Bills: HF2233, HF1524, HF1893, HF1396, HF2456, HF2959, HF2300, HF2412, HF3022, HF2825, HF1862, HF1373, HF1039, HF3070

Keywords: Uniform Special Deposits Act, special deposit, banking law, financial institutions, escrow, escrow account, trust account, security deposit, beneficiary, depositor, creditor process, garnishment, attachment, levy, setoff, recoupment, financial market infrastructure, retirement benefits, compensation, earnest money

Transcript Highlights:

• Again, I support the concept.
• Again, I support the concept.
• You’re a brain builder and an economy supporter and a family supporter, too, and all that work.
• You’re a brain builder and an economy supporter and a family supporter, too, and all that work.
• You’re a brain builder and an economy supporter and a family supporter, too, and all that work.

Bills: HF2582, HF2266, HF2518, HF2039, HF1941

Keywords: child care, grants, appropriation, workforce development, families, YWCA Minneapolis, job training, child development, economic assistance, WomenVenture, economic development, entrepreneurship, women entrepreneurs, business training, financial support, youth programs, funding, employment, Minnesota, American Indian

Transcript Highlights:

• We strongly support the basic needs.
• </c> They supported adoption with our family. They supported adoption with our family.
• ,</c><01:24:37.840><c> uh</c><01:24:38.160><c> but</c> bipartisan support, uh but bipartisan support,
• So, I support what you're doing and to support kids.
• </c> and to support kids. and to support kids.

Bills: HF3665, HF3002, HF4217, HF4125, HF4174

Keywords: foster care, early childhood education, child care programs, placement plan, social services, extended foster care, kinship care, relative custody, permanent legal and physical custody, Northstar kinship assistance, independent living plan, transition services, youth aging out of care, medical assistance, Medicaid, child welfare, children youth and families, out-of-home placement, case plan, relative placement

Transcript Highlights:

• First, we'll go out to the audience here with us, those in support.
• We strongly support this bill.
• We would also like to stand in support and just say...
• And so we urge your support.
• Okay, so there were four or five in support, no one in opposition.

Bills: SB234, SB210, SB243, SB244, SM16, HB8

Keywords: foster children, school transportation, education funding, public education, child welfare, New Mexico Highlands University, soccer field, women's sports, infrastructure improvement, funding allocation, student athletes, appropriation, New Mexico State University, nutrition, travel support, funding, education, university support, financial assistance, parenting students

Transcript Highlights:

• It supports teachers with meaningful professional learning, and it strengthens the systems that support
• The focus has been galvanized across the state with legislative support, governor support, and all of
• All of us work together to support.
• And I support what's in the bill.
• And I support what's in the bill.

Bills: SB234, SB210, SB243, SB244, SM16, HB8

Keywords: foster children, school transportation, education funding, public education, child welfare, New Mexico Highlands University, soccer field, women's sports, infrastructure improvement, funding allocation, student athletes, appropriation, New Mexico State University, nutrition, travel support, funding, education, university support, financial assistance, parenting students

Transcript Highlights:

• First, we'll go out to the audience here with us, those in support.
• We strongly support this bill.
• And so we urge your support. Thank you. Thank you. Please go ahead. Mr.
• And so we urge your support. Thank you. Thank you. Please go ahead. Mr.
• Okay, so there were four or five in support, no one in opposition.

Bills: SB234, SB210, SB243, SB244, SM16, HB8

Keywords: foster children, school transportation, education funding, public education, child welfare, New Mexico Highlands University, soccer field, women's sports, infrastructure improvement, funding allocation, student athletes, appropriation, New Mexico State University, nutrition, travel support, funding, education, university support, financial assistance, parenting students

Summary: The Senate Education Committee began by announcing that SB 210 would be rolled over to Friday and would not be heard. The committee then returned to SB 234, which would provide foster child school transportation funding statewide rather than only for Albuquerque Public Schools. Members adopted an amendment striking the APS-only language and making the bill statewide after testimony from the sponsor, PED, and others that foster youth transportation is a growing issue and should have its own funding stream. The committee discussed how the money might be distributed and whether the $1.2 million appropriation would be sufficient, then voted do pass on SB 234 as amended. The committee next heard HB 8, which creates a Higher Education Major Projects Fund for large capital projects that are difficult to fund through existing capital outlay processes. Testimony from the sponsor, LFC, HED, and university representatives explained that the bill would support projects such as the UNM School of Medicine, an NMSU multidisciplinary building, student housing, student life projects, and certain Division I athletic facilities, while requiring design readiness, institutional matches, and legislative oversight. Several senators raised concerns about the clarity of the prioritization process, the Division I-only athletics language, the recurring nature of future funding, and the relationship to other capital funding streams, but the committee ultimately voted do pass on HB 8. The committee then considered SB 243 and SB 244, nearly identical bills for UNM and NMSU that would each appropriate $5 million for student health, student support, nutrition, travel, scholarships, and other athletic department needs. Athletic directors testified that conference realignment, higher travel costs, nutrition demands, and new revenue-sharing/NIL obligations have increased expenses, and sponsors said the bills were intended as one-time appropriations. Some senators questioned whether the requests should be recurring or funded through university revenue rather than the state, but both bills received do pass recommendations. Finally, the committee heard SM 16, as amended, which asks HED to convene a task force to study parenting students in higher education and recommend ways to collect data and improve support. Supporters said better data is needed to understand barriers such as child care and transportation, and the memorial passed with a do pass recommendation. The committee then adjourned until Friday morning.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm here to support Senate Bill... responsibly responsive and to support biliteracy.
• Thank you for your support.
• I'm going to support this bill. But Mr. Treasurer... Okay. I'm going to support this bill. But Mr.
• All of us work together to support.
• And I support what's in the bill.

Bills: SB234, SB210, SB243, SB244, SM16, HB8

Keywords: foster children, school transportation, education funding, public education, child welfare, New Mexico Highlands University, soccer field, women's sports, infrastructure improvement, funding allocation, student athletes, appropriation, New Mexico State University, nutrition, travel support, funding, education, university support, financial assistance, parenting students

Summary: The committee heard Senate Bill 37, the High-Quality Literacy Instruction Act, which would strengthen reading instruction and educator preparation around the science of reading. The sponsor and supporters said the bill requires evidence-based, culturally and linguistically responsive literacy instruction, including support for English learners and students in bilingual and dual-language programs, use of approved high-quality instructional materials for K-3 reading and interventions, a K-3 reading assessment, literacy coaches, and parent progress reports. An amendment package was adopted to clarify biliteracy language, broaden references to bilingual/dual-language and Indigenous language settings, remove awkward phrasing, and adjust reporting requirements from monthly to four times per school year. The committee then moved forward with the amended bill. Public testimony was largely supportive. Students, educators, school leaders, advocacy groups, and tribal representatives said structured literacy has improved reading outcomes and can help struggling readers, including students with dyslexia and multilingual learners. Several speakers emphasized that the amended bill better protects bilingual, dual-language, and Native language programs, and some noted the importance of parent communication and early intervention. Supporters also cited recent literacy gains in New Mexico and said the bill aligns teacher preparation, materials, assessment, and coaching. Opposition focused mainly on concerns that the bill could still privilege English over Indigenous languages, that high-quality materials requirements may be too restrictive or costly for districts, and that testing and reporting could add workload. Tribal speakers from Acoma and Taos said they could not support the bill without further changes to explicitly protect Native language revitalization. Other opponents raised concerns about funding for materials and coaches, the burden on teachers, and whether the assessment and HQIM requirements would be flexible enough for local needs. In committee discussion, the sponsor and PED said existing funds and staff could support implementation, that the assessment would be formative and teacher-focused, and that the bill was intended to complement, not replace, Native and bilingual education programs.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> we've received resolutions of support we've received resolutions of support from<00:07:22.440><c
• </c><00:09:08.160><c> specialized</c> resources needed to support specialized resources needed to support
• as you mentioned remote remote support as you mentioned remote support<00:35:32.240><c> can</c><00:35
• in jails and additional support in jails and additional Community<00:45:09.760><c> Support</c><00:45
• We thank you for your support. We thank you for your support.

Bills: HF1380, HF1166, HF487, HF1553, HF1472, HF258, HF1911

Keywords: psychiatric treatment, human services, mental health funding, per diem rate, Clay County, disability services, assistive technology, remote support, advocacy, training programs, HF487, Wellness in the Woods, Minnesota human services, grant funding, general fund appropriation, peer support, substance use recovery, addiction recovery, reentry services, reentry after incarceration

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:36:17.599><c> Community</c> integrated community supports Community integrated community supports
• How will these be determined, and what data supports these definitions?
• For example, the three employment support services currently include the program support component that
• For example, the three employment support services currently include the program support component that
• For example, the three employment support services currently include the program support component that

Bills: HF1662, HF2115, HF2159, HF1095, HF2160

Keywords: veterans, veterans affairs, State Soldiers Assistance Program, Veterans Stable Housing Initiative, MAXIS, human services data, data sharing, eligibility verification, informed consent, private data, benefits coordination, veteran housing, veteran assistance, Department of Human Services, Children Youth and Families, state benefits, federal benefits, privacy, public assistance, human services

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> &gt;&gt; I appreciate the support. &gt;&gt; I appreciate the support.
• </c> students, for instance, AI can support students, for instance, AI can support career<00:09:43.760
• </c><00:10:02.800><c> code</c> technology at supporting code technology at supporting code development
• </c><00:14:25.519><c> and</c> vision by coordinating, supporting and vision by coordinating, supporting
• </c><00:18:17.360><c> K</c> employees, and continuing to support K employees, and continuing to support

Bills: HF1316, HF4369

Keywords: HF1316, child support, new hire reporting, centralized work reporting system, independent contractors, payors, employers, payor of funds, withholding orders, income withholding, child support enforcement, Minnesota Department of Children, Youth, and Families, gig economy, rideshare drivers, delivery drivers, 1099, W-9, W-4, newly hired workers, rehired employees

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> child support nor public assistance. child support nor public assistance.
• </c> account to support us. account to support us.
• </c> for the neighbors that we support. for the neighbors that we support.
• </c> supporting Minnesota families. supporting Minnesota families.
• So by supporting us you know you're So by supporting us you know you're supporting<01:27:25.440><c> our

Bills: HF45, HF1148, HF3624, HF3586, HF777

Keywords: HF45, Lake Benton, capital investment, bonding bill, state bonds, bond proceeds fund, Public Facilities Authority, public infrastructure, sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, utility replacement, U.S. Highway 75, road reconstruction, municipal infrastructure, local government grant, Minnesota bonding, capital appropriation, food insecurity, prepared meals

Transcript Highlights:

• All right, next speaker signed in and support: Gina Godby here. ...and support. Gina Godby here.
• I'm also with Arizona Right to Life, and I'm in support of this bill and in support of women.
• to support their children.
• to support their children.
• I'm here in support of HB 2074.

Bills: HB2043, HB2045, HB2046, HB2048, HB2064, HB2074, HB2126, HB2133, HB2144

Keywords: felony murder, unborn child, homicide, Arizona Revised Statutes, life imprisonment, death penalty, drive-by shooting, gun violence, firearms, felony, vehicle forfeiture, driver license revocation, drive by shooting, public safety, criminal penalties, education, funding, school districts, state aid, education reform

Bills: HB40, HB40, HB1916, HB1973, HB2524, HB2530, HB3180, HB3421, HB3783, HB4170, HB4213

Keywords: law enforcement, sheriffs, constables, contracts, county authority, business court, civil procedure, litigation, jurisdiction, arbitration, divorce, property division, family law, court jurisdiction, marital assets, parent-child relationship, birth certificate, identity proof, Family Code, court process

Transcript Highlights:

• The intention of the child support system is to ensure children have financial support from the non-custodial
• . all support, medical bills.
• He never paid child support.
• My ex refused to get the help that he needed to support our co-parenting. and support healthy relationships
• I do, however, support... I am here testifying in support of the bill.

Bills: HB40, HB1916, HB1973, HB2524, HB2530, HB3180, HB3421, HB3783, HB4170, HB4213, HB40

Keywords: business court, civil procedure, litigation, jurisdiction, arbitration, divorce, property division, family law, court jurisdiction, marital assets, parent-child relationship, birth certificate, identity proof, Family Code, court process, attorney fees, court costs, legal expenses, dispute resolution, child support