Video & Transcript : 'pistol' :

Page 6 of 18
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary (03/31/2026)

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • . >> So, if you're threatening with—if you picked up your pistol, pulled it out of the holster, you are
  • So if it's a starter pistol and it appears is that— carrying a deadly weapon.
  • threatening with if you picked<00:54:25.680><c> up</c><00:54:25.839><c> your</c><00:54:26.079><c> pistol
  • </c><00:54:56.079><c> and</c><00:54:56.240><c> it</c> So if it's a starter pistol and it So if it's a
  • is that &gt;&gt; well<00:54:58.720><c> it</c><00:54:59.440><c> starter</c><00:54:59.839><c> pistol</
Committee: Senate Judiciary
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Rules Committee Jun 24th, 2026

Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • , the California Houndsman for Conservation, and also seeing support for the California Rifle and Pistol
  • , the California Houndsman for Conservation, and also seeing support for the California Rifle and Pistol
  • , the California Houndsman for Conservation, and also seeing support for the California Rifle and Pistol
Committee: Senate Rules
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Public Safety Committee Mar 17th, 2026

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • would like to mention this bill as consistent with the requirements under New York State Rifle and Pistol
  • would like to mention this bill as concurrent with the requirements under New York State Rifle and Pistol
  • It is also authorized to speak on behalf of the California Rifle and Pistol Association.
Summary: The committee heard presentations on several bills and one resolution, with testimony largely focused on public safety, criminal justice, and victim/survivor protections. SB 936 by Senator Blakespear would restrict retail sale of larger nitrous oxide canisters to curb youth misuse and impaired driving; supporters included prosecutors, local officials, cities, counties, and environmental groups, while the ACLU opposed the bill unless amended to rely on regulation rather than criminal penalties. Members raised concerns about overbreadth and possible amendments, but the author said the bill would be narrowed and emphasized it would not create jail time, only escalating fines. SB 941 by Senator Padilla would cap commissary markups in private federal immigration detention facilities, mirroring a prior prison commissary law; it drew strong support from immigrant justice advocates and civil rights groups, with no opposition heard, and members expressed support for the measure. SCR 118 by Senator Gonzalez urged release of unclassified Jeffrey Epstein investigation files and greater transparency for survivors. The author and CAST testified in support, emphasizing survivor trauma and accountability; one committee member voiced concern that the resolution could imply facts not yet established and said he would likely abstain, while others supported the resolution as part of broader anti-trafficking efforts. SB 1009 by Senator Becker would require clear and convincing evidence before detaining youth in juvenile hall and would favor less restrictive alternatives; supporters included youth defenders, former system-involved youth, and many advocacy organizations, while probation and district attorneys opposed it, arguing it would limit judicial discretion, strain resources, and could jeopardize public safety. Members were split, with some emphasizing the harms of detention and others warning about home-environment risks and implementation challenges. AB 46 by Assembly Member Nguyen would revise mental health diversion law to give judges clearer authority to deny diversion when public safety is at risk. Support came from prosecutors, probation, and crime survivors who described cases where diverted defendants later committed serious violence; opposition from public defenders and civil rights groups argued that judges already have discretion, diversion is rarely granted, and the bill would reduce access to treatment and worsen outcomes. The author said the bill was a balanced compromise developed with stakeholders. Finally, SB 948 by Senator Aegean would require more comprehensive firearm safety training for firearm safety certificates and require new California residents to register firearms and obtain a certificate within 60 days; supporters from Brady and youth gun-violence prevention groups cited accidental shootings and child deaths, and the author noted possible future amendments on timing for new residents. Throughout the hearing, the chair repeatedly noted the committee lacked a quorum, so no votes were taken during the transcript.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Public Safety Committee Mar 17th, 2026

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • would like to mention this bill as concurrent with the requirements under New York State Rifle and Pistol
  • would like to mention this bill as concurrent with the requirements under New York State Rifle and Pistol
  • I'm also authorized to speak on behalf of the California Rifle and Pistol Association.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Public Safety met on March 17, 2026, with no quorum at the start and throughout much of the hearing, so bills were presented and discussed but no final votes were taken. The committee heard SB 936 on nitrous oxide sales, SB 941 on commissary price caps in private immigration detention facilities, SCR 118 urging release of Jeffrey Epstein-related files, SB 1009 on juvenile detention standards, AB 46 on mental health diversion, and SB 948 on firearm safety training and registration for new residents. The chair explained public comment procedures and noted that SB 891 was on consent, but the transcript focused on the other measures. SB 936 drew strong support from the author, prosecutors, local officials, and public health/environmental groups, who described rising misuse of flavored large nitrous oxide canisters, youth targeting, impaired driving crashes, deaths, and waste disposal costs. Opposition from the ACLU argued the bill was too broad and should use a regulatory rather than criminal approach, warning about overreach into ordinary household items. Members generally expressed support, though some asked for narrowing amendments to avoid unintended coverage. SB 941 was presented as a cap on markups for commissary goods sold to detainees in privately run federal immigration detention facilities, modeled on prior prison commissary limits. Supporters described severe price inflation for basic necessities and the burden on families, while no opposition testified. SCR 118, calling for full release of unclassified Epstein investigation files, was supported by the author, a survivor statement, and anti-trafficking advocates; one member objected that the resolution could implicate people without full facts, while others emphasized transparency and survivor accountability. SB 1009 and AB 46 both centered on criminal justice discretion: SB 1009 would require clear and convincing evidence before detaining youth and was supported by defenders and youth advocates but opposed by probation and district attorneys who warned about public safety and resource constraints; AB 46 would narrow mental health diversion by allowing judges to deny diversion when public safety is at risk, with prosecutors and victims’ families supporting it and public defenders, ACLU, and behavioral health groups opposing it as an unnecessary restriction on treatment. SB 948 would expand firearm safety certificate requirements to include live-fire training and require new California residents to register firearms within 60 days; the author and gun-safety advocates supported it as a common-sense safety measure, and the hearing moved into support testimony as the transcript ended.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Public Safety Committee Mar 17th, 2026

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • would like to mention this bill as consistent with the requirements under New York State Rifle & Pistol
  • would like to mention this bill as concurrent with the requirements under New York State Rifle and Pistol
  • I am also authorized to speak on behalf of the California Rifle and Pistol Association.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Mar 5th, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's a device that is easily and simply used to put into a a pistol very quickly and turns that pistol
  • know, an M9 into a handgun or empty out the entire clip. with one pull of the trigger of a basic pistol
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (01/14/2026)

Criminal Justice and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • Talking to you regarding HB 1365 relative to applications for licenses to carry a pistol, pistol, or
  • It does not change who may or who may not receive a pistol or revolver license.
  • more than the pistol licenses.
  • licenses more than non-resident pistol licenses more than the<03:41:35.200><c> pistol</c><03:41:35.520
  • Those are done by the pistol licenses.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:30 am

Joint Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security

Transcript Highlights:
  • 2022, the Supreme Court decision in the Bruen case ruled in favor of the New York State Rifle and Pistol
  • that right to apply to all 50 states, including Massachusetts, and the *New York State Rifle and Pistol
  • And the *New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v.
  • State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen and McDonald v.
Summary: The hearing focused heavily on firearms legislation, especially bills to repeal Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 (including H. 2618/S. 1671 and related repeal measures) and bills on firearm industry accountability (H. 2672/S. 1653). Supporters of repeal, including Senator Peter Durant, Rep. Ken Sweezey, gun owners, instructors, sportsmen, and women’s gun-rights advocates, argued that Chapter 135 overreaches, creates confusion in licensing and training requirements, burdens lawful gun owners, restricts pepper spray and semi-automatic firearms, and is being enforced in ways they said criminalize responsible conduct. Committee members defending the law said it was the product of years of work, public listening sessions, and multiple drafts, and argued that Massachusetts remains the safest state for gun violence and that implementation issues, such as live-fire training, had been delayed to allow time for regulations and infrastructure. Several witnesses also testified on H. 2672/S. 1653, which would create firearm industry standards of conduct and allow civil actions against manufacturers, distributors, and dealers that engage in unsafe or unlawful practices. Supporters from the Massachusetts Coalition to Prevent Gun Violence, Everytown, Brady, Giffords, and survivors described the bill as a way to hold the industry accountable, reduce the flow of crime guns, and give victims and the Attorney General a path to sue bad actors. They cited data on crime-gun traces, disproportionate impacts on communities of color, and examples from other states that have enacted similar laws. Opponents, including gun dealers and industry representatives, argued that existing law already punishes illegal sales, that most crime guns are stolen or diverted after lawful sale, and that the bill would improperly target manufacturers for the actions of others. The committee also heard testimony on a bill to remove the non-resident ban on semi-automatic firearms for hunting (H. 2710/S. 1676), with Backcountry Hunters and Anglers supporting the change as a way to restore access for returning residents, veterans, and hunting programs that had been displaced. Later testimony returned to repeal and related gun-law bills, with sportsmen’s groups arguing Chapter 135 was rushed, confusing, and harmful to youth hunting and lawful ownership. No votes or final committee actions were taken during the hearing; it was a public testimony session with extensive questioning by committee members.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary (05/20/2025)

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • person is guilty of a class B felony if he commits or attempts to commit any felony when armed with a pistol
  • to commit any felony when armed<00:45:39.839><c> with</c><00:45:40.000><c> a</c><00:45:40.240><c> pistol
  • ,</c><00:45:40.640><c> revolver,</c><00:45:41.359><c> rifle,</c> armed with a pistol, revolver, rifle
  • , armed with a pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun,<00:45:42.240><c> or</c><00:45:42.480><c> any</c><00:
Committee: Senate Judiciary
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (05/09/2025)

Criminal Justice and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • Can they have a pistol? Um, can it be loaded when it's in the car?
  • Can they have a pistol? Um, can it be loaded when it's in the car?
  • Can they have a pistol? Um, can it be loaded when it's in the car?
  • Can they have a pistol?
  • Um, can it be loaded when it's pistol?
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Public Safety Committee Jun 16th, 2026

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm also authorized to speak on behalf of the California Rifle and Pistol Association.
  • not get his guns back within five years, I can tell you it's a relief to the victims who have been pistol-whipped
  • Gun Owners of California, and I'm also authorized to speak on behalf of the California Rifle and Pistol
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

General Laws Mar 4th, 2026

General Laws

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chairman and sir, was that we had a president who passed an executive order that outlawed pistol braces
  • Chairman and, sir, was that we had a president who passed an executive order that outlawed pistol braces
  • There was 40 million in circulation across the country. executive order that outlawed pistol braces.
Committee: House General Laws
Summary: The committee first met in executive session and approved HB 2468 and HB 2481. HB 2481 was amended to replace earlier federal-style language with the governor’s recommended definitions and executive-order language, then rolled into a committee substitute and passed out of committee on a 9-3 vote. The discussion on HB 2481 centered on SNAP-related definitions and whether the revised language would affect federal waivers or change food-stamp purchasing rules; the sponsor said it would not. The committee then moved to regular session. The main public hearing was on HB 3070, the Second Amendment Preservation Act. Representative Hardwick said the bill was revised to remove language the Eighth Circuit had found problematic, while keeping Missouri’s anti-commandeering approach and prohibitions on state or local participation in certain federal gun-control actions, such as firearm registries, tracking, and confiscation from law-abiding citizens. Members questioned whether the bill would interfere with task forces, federal cooperation, courthouses, FFL paperwork, or local officers sharing information with federal agents. Hardwick and supporters said it would not affect Missouri enforcement of state gun laws or cooperation on other crimes, and that the bill was intended to stop Missouri officers from being used to enforce specific federal gun-control measures. Supporters from the Missouri Firearms Coalition and a gun-rights advocate backed the bill and emphasized civil penalties and anti-commandeering protections, while an opponent from Moms Demand Action argued it would handcuff police, weaken interstate trafficking enforcement, and create a dangerous patchwork of enforcement. No vote was taken on HB 3070 in the hearing. The committee also heard HB 388, which would prohibit certain anti-competitive health-care contracting practices, including anti-steering, anti-tiering, gag clauses, and most-favored-nation clauses. The sponsor and supporting witnesses described the bill as an anti-consolidation measure intended to improve price transparency, preserve competition, and help consumers and insurers steer patients toward lower-cost providers. They said the bill would apply to both providers and insurers and would not be anti-hospital or anti-payer. Members asked about effects on rural access to care, 340B pricing, physician-owned referral arrangements, and whether the bill would actually lower consumer costs. Supporters said the goal was to give payers more negotiating leverage and ultimately benefit patients through more competitive pricing, but no action was taken during the hearing.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session Apr 3rd, 2025 at 01:00 pm

North Dakota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • After searching his vehicle, I found a Glock pistol, fully loaded, under the front driver's seat of that
  • That pistol came back as stolen. This individual was charged with convicted felon...
  • That pistol came back as stolen. This individual was charged with convicted felon with a firearm.
Summary: The House convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and a quorum present. Representative Hoverson offered remarks recognizing World Autism Day, and the House then handled conference committee motions on several bills, including House Bills 1460 and 1248 and Senate Bills 2262, 2070, 2294, and 2297, with the Speaker appointing members to each conference committee. The chamber also set aside Senate Bill 2200 for re-referral to Appropriations and moved to amendments on Senate Bill 2128, which was the main subject of the day. Senate Bill 2128, a major criminal justice and corrections bill, drew extensive debate over truth-in-sentencing, mandatory minimums, parole, transitional facilities, work release, electronic monitoring, and the fiscal impact of longer incarceration. Division A of the amendments removed mandatory minimums for resisting arrest and felony simple assault while keeping consecutive-sentence language; supporters said this preserved judicial discretion and reduced costs, while opponents argued it weakened public safety. Division A was adopted 70-23. Division B proposed broader changes to preserve transitional programming, add penalties for tampering with electronic monitoring and escape, limit some work-release restrictions, create a parole board study, and fund electronic monitoring with a $600,000 appropriation. Supporters framed it as a compromise that balanced rehabilitation and public safety; opponents said it undercut the bill’s intent and left dangerous offenders with too much access to transitional release. Division B failed on a 46-46 tie. The House then took up the bill itself, with the Judiciary Committee reporting a do-not-pass recommendation as amended, and debate continued over whether the amended bill should advance, with members split between concerns about victims and public safety versus rehabilitation, prison capacity, and recidivism.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Jefferson County Legislation Committee Apr 17th, 2025

Jefferson County Legislation

Transcript Highlights:
  • This past year, the Alabama public examiners found a flaw in their pistol permit process.
Bills: HB375 , HB494 , HB375
ID

Idaho 2026 Regular Session

Mar 26th, 2026

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The cowboys liked it because they could use the same cartridge in the rifle as they did their pistols
  • When it was made, a new cartridge was made just for it, and that was the .45 ACP, the Automatic Colt Pistol
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • I consent to the release of information about my ability and fitness to carry a pistol by my employers
  • rest, it would say beyond what is expressly required on a State of New Hampshire application for pistol
  • :17.960><c> for</c> state of New Hampshire application for state of New Hampshire application for pistol
  • </c><02:15:19.320><c> Now,</c><02:15:19.480><c> they</c><02:15:19.680><c> will</c> pistol revolver license
  • Now, they will pistol revolver license.
Summary: The meeting began as a Committee of Conference on House Bill 194, but the discussion quickly centered on whether to remove an attached bill, 504, because of concerns about a possible fee or tax and a House rule issue. Members debated the procedural posture of the bill, whether the House version had been non-concurred, and whether the conference committee could still resolve the issue by adopting the House amendment or reconsidering the non-concur. The exchange became tense, with one side warning that failing to pass the measure could jeopardize a linked rural health transformation grant worth about $20 million. The committee ultimately recessed without resolving the 194/504 dispute and planned to return the next day. The committee then opened conference on House Bill 609, which dealt with use-of-force/self-defense language and restraint/seclusion authority in health care settings. On the self-defense portion, House members argued strongly for restoring vehicle language, saying people should be able to defend themselves in a car the same way they can in a home, especially in carjacking or assault situations where no weapon is displayed. Senate members expressed concern about expanding deadly-force protections too broadly and suggested narrowing the language to focus on imminent harm to the person, not property, while also questioning where the provision should be placed in statute. The second major topic in HB 609 was who may order restraint or seclusion in clinical settings. House members argued that physicians are not always immediately available, especially in hospitals and emergency settings, and that APRNs and physician associates should be able to act in crises if properly trained and credentialed. Senate members raised concerns about scope of practice and asked whether the language implied patient consent was required; the Senate side explained that consent language was intended to address capacity and informed decision-making, not to require voluntary consent to restraint. The discussion ended with the sides still apart, though the Senate floated a compromise allowing physician associates to order restraint when no doctor is physically on the premises, while not yet extending that authority to APRNs. The committee took a short break to continue negotiations on the firearm/self-defense piece.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/24/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • section five on page 14 at the bottom, you'll see where current statute on occasion refers just to a pistol
  • So this would just clarify that language to say that not only are you ineligible to have that pistol
  • </c><01:50:45.800><c> or</c> on occasion refers just to a pistol or on occasion refers just to a pistol
  • </c><01:51:01.760><c> or</c><01:51:01.880><c> the</c> ineligible to have that pistol or the ineligible
  • to have that pistol or the designated<01:51:02.600><c> firearm,</c><01:51:03.400><c> you're</c><01:51
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Water, Parks, and Wildlife Committee Jun 16th, 2026

Water, Parks, and Wildlife

Transcript Highlights:
  • Nick Villal, with the California Rifle and Pistol Association, in full support as well. Thank you.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Day 51 (3-20-26)

Kentucky Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, I may or may not have been one of those women on a college campus that carried her pistol with her
  • a college campus that that<01:20:08.640><c> carried</c><01:20:09.040><c> her</c><01:20:09.280><c> pistol
  • /c><01:20:09.600><c> with</c><01:20:09.760><c> her</c><01:20:10.000><c> when</c> that carried her pistol
  • with her when that carried her pistol with her when she<01:20:10.320><c> was</c><01:20:10.560><c> coming