Video & Transcript Research : 'delinquency penalties'

Page 6 of 383
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Environmental Regulation May 1st, 2025

Environmental Regulation

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill also aims to strengthen administrative penalties to further prevent non-compliance.
  • It's for administrative penalties.
  • The TCEQ issues a penalty, and half of that can go into one of these local projects.
  • Many of the biggest civil penalties that we receive are in those Attorney General actions.
  • Authorizing a civil penalty. The chair moves that the substitute to SB 2078 be adopted.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Mar 11th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • We're looking, seeking to increase the penalties for certain vehicles burglaries.
  • Only affecting is a penalty enhancement for all kinds of thefts.
  • It's a higher level of crime, and it's already felony penalty. And it would be easy.
  • His firearm in the car versus increasing other penalties.
  • No criminal penalty, there's no civil penalty.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Apr 14th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Charge agreements to remit 50 cents to the comptroller for every delinquency charge that is in excess
  • disclosures, require MCAs to register, prohibit deceptive trade practices, and include an enforceable penalty
  • And if this is in the form of a CD, we're looking at a product that's not... ...liquid and has penalties
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Apr 14th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill puts no penalties or restrictions on banks. This is not about banks.
  • Restaurant operators and other merchants should not have to pay a penalty or a private tax to card companies
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 16th, 2025 at 08:04 am

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • If you don't stop, I'm going to impose a penalty. If they don't stop, you impose the penalty.
  • The penalties you collect nowhere near match what the penalties will be assessed. That goes on.
  • The penalties you collect nowhere near match what the penalties will be assessed against the district
  • I cannot afford in one month a $4.65 million penalty. No crop would withstand that kind of penalty.
  • It's not an inadequate penalty under current law.
Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources met with a quorum present and first took up several pending bills for reconsideration and committee substitute adoption. House Bill 2692, relating to codification and clarification of local laws concerning the San Antonio River Authority, was reported favorably to the full House and sent to the Committee on Local and Consent Calendars by an 11-0 vote. House Bills 1407, 1520, 1535, 2970, 4153, 291, 3663, and 3915 were also reconsidered or laid out as pending business, with committee substitutes adopted where needed and each bill reported favorably, generally by unanimous vote, to the full House and then to Calendars or Calendars/Calendars-related referral as applicable. The committee then heard House Bill 4530, which would expand the Texas Water Trust framework to include groundwater rights, require Texas Water Development Board review and approval of groundwater dedications, and notify local groundwater districts when groundwater rights are placed in the trust. The bill’s author and witnesses from the Environmental Defense Fund, The Nature Conservancy, and Chispa Texas supported the measure as a conservation tool and a way to create a clear process for voluntary donations; a Texas Water Development Board witness testified neutrally. The bill was left pending. House Bill 4931, relating to an aquifer storage and recovery project in Medina County, drew support from the author, the Medina County judge, and a regional water alliance witness, who described severe stress on the Edwards Aquifer, low levels at Medina Lake, and the need for a local water-supply tool. The bill was left pending. House Bill 5559, which would clarify enforcement of drought contingency plans for investor-owned water utilities and involve the PUC in model plan development, received support from groundwater district representatives but also concerns from water company and utility witnesses about enforcement authority, approval procedures, and potential conflicts with existing obligations to provide continuous service; the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. House Bill 5560, which would raise the maximum civil penalty for certain groundwater conservation district enforcement actions from $10,000 to $25,000 per violation, prompted debate over whether current law is already sufficient; supporters said the higher cap would better deter overpumping, while opponents argued existing penalties are already severe. That bill was also left pending, and the committee adjourned subject to call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Apr 16th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Those penalties are not part of their rate structure.
  • If you don't stop, I'm going to impose a penalty. They don't stop, you impose the penalty.
  • The penalties you collect nowhere near match what the penalties will be assessed against the district
  • No crop would withstand that kind of penalty.
  • penalties for murder.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 13th, 2026 at 04:06 pm

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • And it's also including language that talks about the penalty, Where it talks about the penalty, that
  • That being said, the penalties in this bill are greater.
  • When the legislature sets penalties, they're trying to index the penalty to the harm.
  • We think that's what merits additional penalties.
  • That's why we believe the criminal penalties are necessary.
Bills: SB23, SB221, SB261, SB264