Transcript Highlights:

• It's important to note that our data practices statutes, which govern our law enforcement data, already
• To suggest that we should create firewalls or carve out an exception to the sharing of this data with
• He added that data practices statutes already mandate sharing in many instances and allow it in others
• to support that a chilling survey data to support that a chilling effect<01:15:55.000> theory
• Practices Act to of the Minnesota data Practices Act to require<01:26:31.239> all<01:26:31.639

Bills: HF1051, HF16

Keywords: sacred communities, micro units, religious institutions, housing regulations, homelessness, conditional use permits, immigration enforcement, sanctuary policies, sanctuary city, noncooperation ordinance, ICE, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, federal immigration authorities, deportation, undocumented immigrant, undocumented person, immigration status data, data sharing, preemption, local government

Transcript Highlights:

• Public following when it becomes inactive, the data I would refer to the Data Practices Act in what it
• says about criminal investigative data.
• Inactive investigative data is classified as public; active investigative data is confidential.
• de-identified data to be shared.
• The data classification provisions are consistent with existing data classification of similar data reported

Bills: HF2354, HF1672, HF2389, HF2870, HF2743, HF1918, HF2551, HF1671

Keywords: medical assistance, fraud prevention, subpoena authority, criminal penalties, consumer protection, medical cannabis, medical marijuana, cannabis, cannabinoids, hemp, marijuana registry, patient registry, visiting patient, Tribal cannabis, Tribal medical cannabis program, Tribal sovereignty, Office of Cannabis Management, designated caregiver, home cultivation, adult-use cannabis

Transcript Highlights:

• The data I would refer to the Data Practices Act and what it says about criminal investigative data.
• to the data The data I would refer to the data practices<00:09:17.120> act<00:09:18.080> and
• criminal investigative data. criminal investigative data.
• The data classification provisions are consistent with existing data classification of similar data reported
• data classification of similar data data classification of similar data reported<00:31:57.440>

Bills: HF2354, HF1672, HF2389, HF2870, HF2743, HF1918, HF2551, HF1671

Keywords: medical assistance, fraud prevention, subpoena authority, criminal penalties, consumer protection, medical cannabis, medical marijuana, cannabis, cannabinoids, hemp, marijuana registry, patient registry, visiting patient, Tribal cannabis, Tribal medical cannabis program, Tribal sovereignty, Office of Cannabis Management, designated caregiver, home cultivation, adult-use cannabis

Transcript Highlights:

• My hope always is with data practices that when someone like Representative Green, who is new to data
• So, my question is, if you're gathering all this data, but the public is not able to see the data, and
• We'd love to see data on that.
• Passing that there would be a large fiscal note just to collect the data that small amount of data that
• sometimes health-related data or other kinds of data.

Bills: HF2233, HF1999, HF1995, HF1614, HF2781, HF1775, HF1316, HF2127, HF2521, HF689, HF2380, HF1273

Keywords: Uniform Special Deposits Act, special deposit, banking law, financial institutions, escrow, escrow account, trust account, security deposit, beneficiary, depositor, creditor process, garnishment, attachment, levy, setoff, recoupment, financial market infrastructure, retirement benefits, compensation, earnest money

Transcript Highlights:

• anonymous data requests. And since I was anonymous data requests.
• My hope always is with data practices that when someone like Representative Green, who is green on data
• public has every right to request data public has every right to request data from<00:14:48.160>
• <00:42:59.839> to right now we do not have good data to right now we do not have good data
• often do with health-related data or other kinds of data.

Bills: HF2233, HF1999, HF1995, HF1614, HF2781, HF1775, HF1316, HF2127, HF2521, HF689, HF2380, HF1273

Keywords: Uniform Special Deposits Act, special deposit, banking law, financial institutions, escrow, escrow account, trust account, security deposit, beneficiary, depositor, creditor process, garnishment, attachment, levy, setoff, recoupment, financial market infrastructure, retirement benefits, compensation, earnest money

Transcript Highlights:

• requires the Civil Rights Commission to compile an annual report and hold an annual public hearing on data
• bill and request in the committee report full-time positions, two civil rights investigators, one data
• legislature and posted on HCRC's website and specify that these reports use aggregated anonymized data
• civil rights positions, two civil rights investigators,<00:36:40.079> one<00:36:40.240> data
• analyst, and one investigators, one data analyst, and one program<00:36:41.599> manager.

Bills: SB2055, SB2152

Keywords: civil rights, helpline, investigator, data analysis, Aloha United Way, reporting, confidentiality, community support, mandatory retirement, Hawaii Constitution, judiciary, justices, judges, 912, senate, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard SB 2055, which would create a Civil Rights Commission helpline for reports of harms from federal deployments in Hawaii and require annual reporting and a public hearing. The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission supported the concept but said the bill should be broadened to cover civil rights and human rights violations more generally, and recommended using existing 211/Aloha United Way infrastructure. Testimony was largely in support, with a few opponents. Members focused on whether the proposed line was really a 24-hour legal hotline or a reporting/referral mechanism, what jurisdiction the commission would have over federal employees, and the estimated costs. The committee chair indicated the bill would move forward with amendments, including adopting HCRC recommendations and adding appropriations for Aloha United Way, database/website development, and staffing. The committee then heard SB 2152, a proposed constitutional amendment to raise the mandatory retirement age for state judges and justices from 70 to 75. Judge Robert D.S. Kim, the Office of the Public Defender, Earthjustice, Community Alliance on Prisons, the State of Hawaii Organization of Police Officers, United Public Workers, the League of Women Voters, ILWU Local 142, CARES, and others testified in support, arguing that experienced judges improve stability, reduce vacancies, and preserve institutional knowledge. Opponents or skeptical comments were limited, but one member questioned whether the measure was just a temporary fix rather than a broader solution to judicial succession and mentoring. Members also asked about existing retention and fitness safeguards, including Judicial Selection Commission retention hearings and the Commission on Judicial Conduct’s ability to investigate complaints about a judge’s physical or mental ability to serve. The discussion noted that the measure would still leave those processes in place. No final vote on SB 2152 was taken in the portion provided, but the committee appeared to be moving toward decision-making after questions concluded.

Bills: SB1928, SB259

Keywords: groundwater, water rights, waste prevention, conservation, permitting, Oklahoma Water Resources Board, OWRB, water permits, water use reporting, metering, permit enforcement, groundwater waste, well permitting, cease and desist, fines and penalties, permit suspension, data centers, data processing facilities, cooling systems, evaporative cooling

Transcript Highlights:

• uh a a document that we got from a data uh a a document that we got from a data request<00:10:43.279
• , identities and their data, identities and their data, unfortunately,<00:51:41.119> it<00
• Some data practices stuff, the stuff with the D1, uh, that'll should be looked at in judiciary.
• <01:15:05.840> Some<01:15:06.000> data um be looked at in judiciary.
• Some data um be looked at in judiciary.

Bills: SF856, HF3168, HF3528, HF389

Keywords: Inspector General, fraud prevention, state audit, public funds, misuse, transparency, government accountability, ethnic councils, diversity, governance, state participation, community representation, barbering, licensing, examinations, barber schools, public safety, certifications, Barber Examiners Board, Minnesota Historical Society

Transcript Highlights:

• There’s no keeping data in perpetuity. We are not data farming here like ERIC is.
• That way, it's new data. It's fresh data all the time. We're not holding on to old data that.
• keep our data and that we keep their data.
• This is about just keeping up our data and... about just keeping up our data and ensuring our data security
• Do you have the data?

Bills: HB479, HB480

Keywords: voting, elections, voter registration, voter rolls, list maintenance, address change, change of address, ERIC, Electronic Registration Information Center, AVID, Alabama Voter Integrity Database, Secretary of State, board of registrars, inactive voter, voter purge, duplicate registration, cross-state voter matching, National Change of Address, NCOA, driver license data

Transcript Highlights:

• The data is clear and unequivocal.
• This bill applies to data centers that use, or are capable of using, 100 megawatts of power or more.
• I know data centers are on a lot of people's minds, the impacts that they may or may not have, but I
• It was a 248-megawatt data center with a much larger accessory-use power plant.
• LLC, and they were 248 megawatt data center with a much larger accessory use power plant.

Bills: SB268, SB306, SB264, SB312

Keywords: federal workers, government shutdown, interest-free loans, tax deferral, public transportation, Rehoboth Beach, municipal charter, city charter amendment, commissioners, mayor, local government, election qualifications, affidavit of eligibility, domestic partner, cohabitant, conflict of interest, freeholder, leaseholder, municipal court, Alderman

Summary: The House Administration Committee met to consider a series of resolutions and bills covering arts districts, child care background checks, federal worker relief, health care reform, court transparency, school tax reassessment, municipal charter changes, constitutional amendment procedures, data center nondisclosure agreements, state employee benefits governance, and lieutenant governor vacancies. Members also noted that House Concurrent Resolution 12 had been removed from the agenda and that public comment would be limited to one minute per speaker. The committee released SCR 167 to study arts, culture, and creative districts in Delaware; HB 438 to close a loophole in the child care service letter requirement; SB 268 to provide interest-free loans, free transit, and tax deferrals for federal workers during shutdowns; SS2 for SB 1 to expand and permanently strengthen primary care investment while also addressing hospital cost growth; HCR 147 to request a Court of Chancery report on audio recordings and automated case assignment; SB 322 to replace the current post-reassessment 10% school revenue increase authority with a 2% annual increase option under safeguards; SB 306 to amend the Rehoboth Beach charter; HB 440 to require voter approval for constitutional amendments after legislative approval; SB 312 to bar nondisclosure agreements for large data center projects; SS1 for SB 289 to change State Employee Benefits Committee governance; and SB 264 to require a special election to fill a lieutenant governor vacancy. Testimony was mixed on several measures. Arts, child care, federal worker relief, primary care, court transparency, data center transparency, and the lieutenant governor vacancy bill drew mostly supportive testimony, while SB 322 and SB 306 drew both support and opposition, especially over tax impacts and the proposed spouse/partner restriction in Rehoboth Beach. HB 440 prompted debate over whether 55% voter approval was the right threshold for constitutional amendments, and SB 312 was supported as a transparency measure by residents affected by prior data center NDAs. All of the listed measures were released from committee by roll call vote, with some members voting no on HB 440, SB 306, SB 312, SS1 for SB 289, and SB 264.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh this bill is uh data privacy.
• private data. private data.
• Secondly, when you say that the data Secondly, when you say that the data becomes<00:25:00.720><
• <00:25:46.720> is children and all a lot of that data is children and all a lot of that data
• <00:30:28.240> Um, data that should remain private. Um, data that should remain private.

Bills: HF1567, HF2809, HF3380

Keywords: public safety officer, peace officer, correctional officer, law enforcement, police privacy, officer safety, doxxing, personal information, data privacy, government data practices, private data, internet posting, online disclosure, residential address, phone number, email address, family member protection, child safety, school information, public records

Bills: HB626, SB265

Keywords: tax increment district, economic development, manufacturing zone, local governance, ad valorem tax, data processing centers, tax abatements, construction related taxes, energy infrastructure, 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So what this does is it's the companion bill to House Bill 399, which is a data center bill, and it's
• 399<00:09:34.080> which<00:09:34.240> is<00:09:34.320> a<00:09:34.640> data
• ><00:09:35.120> center<00:09:35.600> bill<00:09:35.839> and uh 399 which is a data
• center bill and uh 399 which is a data center bill and it's<00:09:36.240> the<00:09:36.480>

Bills: SB265, HB593

Keywords: data processing centers, tax abatements, economic development, construction related taxes, energy infrastructure, small craft distilleries, wineries, alcoholic beverages, licensing, craft beverage industry, 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• to cryptobased data mining operations. to cryptobased data mining operations.
• House File 3296 simply data centers.
• has<00:21:35.440> a<00:21:35.679> high or a data data center that has a high or a
• wanted to pass a law so that data wanted to pass a law so that data centers<00:26:33.919> would
• Um and the data that that region.

Bills: HF3296, HF3802

Keywords: energy conservation, data centers, electric sales, energy optimization, utility regulations, energy regulation, certificate of need, renewable energy, power production, energy efficiency, Minnesota statutes, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Tangible data that this map is not legal, period.
• We're required to draw the maps based on the 2020 census data.
• Look at racial data, but you recognize that your law firm and the map drawer had to look at racial data
• I don't know what the map drawer looked at. You do know that the map drawer looked at racial data.
• Data to decide whether I wanted to carry this map and whether I thought it was a good map for the state

Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5

Keywords: disaster relief, flood preparedness, emergency funding, local government support, meteorological forecasting, school assessment, public education, accountability, transparency, education standards, STAAR, Texas Education Agency, TEA, public school accountability, school ratings, A-F ratings, assessment reform, student testing, benchmark tests, interim assessments

Transcript Highlights:

• This map is drawn, and the only way it can be legally drawn is on the 2020 census data.
• I haven't looked at any of the racial data in the 2021 map.
• Have you seen the data analysis performed by some data... Scientists at UCLA on your map?
• I have an opinion on that; I didn't look at any racial data with regard to this map.
• Generally, yes, I have not taken racial data into consideration in drawing the map.

Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5

Keywords: disaster relief, flood preparedness, emergency funding, local government support, meteorological forecasting, school assessment, public education, accountability, transparency, education standards, STAAR, Texas Education Agency, TEA, public school accountability, school ratings, A-F ratings, assessment reform, student testing, benchmark tests, interim assessments

Transcript Highlights:

• So you’re using data—the underlying basis of the data you’re using to craft 28 new maps is based on data
• “So I used the 2020 census data exclusively. I did not overlay any other data over the map itself.
• So I used the 2020 census data exclusively. I did not overlay any other data over the map itself.
• How did you use the partisan data in drawing this map?
• The map drawer just said himself that they did use partisan data to draw the maps.

Summary: The Committee on Rules met with a quorum and heard a Governor’s Office presentation on a proposed congressional reapportionment map. The governor’s counsel argued that mid-cycle congressional redistricting is legally permissible, that race should not be considered at all in drawing districts, and that the Florida Fair Districts provisions are inconsistent with federal equal protection law and should be treated as non-severable. The presentation also discussed the pending U.S. Supreme Court case Louisiana v. Callais and the Florida Supreme Court’s Black Voters Matter decision as part of the legal rationale for the map. Jason Parada, who said he drew the map alone, described the map as based on 2020 census block data, with county-level population estimates used only as a guide to identify faster-growing areas. He said the plan keeps 48 counties and 382 municipalities whole, has compactness scores similar to the current benchmark map, and uses traditional geographic and political boundaries such as roads, railways, county lines, and municipal lines. He walked through regional changes, emphasizing a race-neutral redesign that significantly altered South Florida, including changes to districts in Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, and the Everglades, while leaving several northern districts largely unchanged. Members questioned the witnesses extensively about the legal theory, the use of partisan data, the role of race, population growth, and the timing and review of the map. The witnesses said partisan data was considered along with other traditional redistricting criteria, but race was not used. They also said they could not speak to who else reviewed the map beyond EOG staff and counsel. Several senators raised concerns about the map’s compactness, county and city splits, the apparent partisan effects, and the fact that the map was released shortly before the special session. No vote or final action on the map was taken during the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• So you're using data—the underlying basis of the data you're using to craft 28 new maps—is based on data
• So I used the 2020 census data exclusively. I did not overlay any other data over the map itself.
• How did you use the partisan data in drawing this map?
• Partisan data when they drew the map. They told us that, that they used partisan data.
• The map drawer just said himself that they did use partisan data to draw the maps.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Do you believe that a map drawn using partisan data complies with the map-drawing...
• Paredes did base the map and draw it on the 2020 census data. Representative Mascamani.
• When we drew maps back in 2022, did we look at partisan data when we drew maps last time?
• And according to Jason Perretta, this map also considered partisan data. ...using the same census data
• And according to Jason Perretta, this map also considered partisan data.

Keywords: 998, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Paredes did base the map and draw it on the 2020 census data. Representative Mascamani.
• When we drew maps back in 2022, did we look at partisan data when we drew maps last time?
• We already redid these maps in 2022 using the same census data we are relying on today.
• And according to Jason Perretta, this map also considered partisan data. ...using the same census data
• And according to Jason Perretta, this map also considered partisan data.

Summary: The House convened with prayer, a moment of silence for former member Mark Weissman and local officials Donna Lou Fiala and Eric C. Brecknitz, and the Pledge of Allegiance. Members approved the journal and adopted the Rules and Ethics Committee’s special order report setting the calendar and debate times for the day. The chamber then took up House Bill 1D, establishing Florida’s congressional districts, as the main item on the special order calendar. During questioning and debate on HB 1D, sponsors and opponents focused heavily on the map’s process and legality. Supporters argued the plan was based on a viable legal theory, used the 2020 census data as required, and was within the Legislature’s discretion to consider mid-cycle redistricting. Opponents repeatedly argued the map was drawn by the governor’s office using partisan data, without meaningful legislative or public input, and that it violated the Fair Districts Amendment by favoring a party, splitting more counties and municipalities, and reducing compactness. Several members also raised concerns about taxpayer costs, the absence of a new census or court order, and the Legislature’s role versus the governor’s office. After structured debate, the House voted on final passage of HB 1D and passed it 83-28. A motion to recess for two hours to consider a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision failed. Following passage of the redistricting bill, the House adopted a motion to adjourn sine die, ending the session.