Video & Transcript Research : 'bond referendum'

Page 6 of 263
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Summary: The committee approved the February 4, 2026 minutes and held SB 1571 until the following week. It then heard and advanced several measures, beginning with SB 1745, which would cap transaction privilege/excise tax rates in the state’s largest cities at 2.5% per classification unless approved by voters, and would allow enforcement through the attorney general and state-shared revenue withholding. Supporters argued it would protect taxpayers and restrain municipal tax increases; the bill received a technical amendment and a due pass recommendation. The committee also advanced SB 1686, renaming Wesley Bolin Memorial Plaza as the Wesley Bolin and Charlie Kirk Freedom Plaza and authorizing memorial placements for Don Bowles and Charlie Kirk, after brief supportive discussion and no substantive opposition testimony. The committee spent substantial time on SB 1567 and SB 1435, both aimed at restricting public entities, schools, and libraries from exposing minors to sexually explicit materials and from using public facilities for sexually explicit filming or access. Supporters framed the bills as child-protection measures and cited examples of explicit books and materials in libraries and schools; opponents, including the ACLU, warned the definitions were broad, could chill speech, and could criminalize librarians and educators for handling constitutionally protected literature or sex-education materials. Both bills were amended and passed on 4-3 votes, with supporters emphasizing existing obscenity standards and opponents stressing First Amendment concerns and implementation problems. The committee also advanced SB 1433 and SB 1434, which would redraw Maricopa County boundaries and, in the latter bill, create three new counties with a transition board and staggered elections. The sponsor argued Maricopa County had become too large and politically dominant, making government less representative and less responsive; opponents called the proposals expensive, disruptive, and politically motivated, citing concerns about debt division, duplicated county systems, and fiscal impacts. Both bills received due pass recommendations on 4-3 votes. Finally, the committee approved SCR 1024, requiring legislators to live in their district for one year before election, and SCR 1025, moving the legislative session start date from the second Monday to the fourth Monday in January; both resolutions passed unanimously or near-unanimously after sponsor testimony that they would modernize outdated rules and improve use of time.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs Apr 7th, 2025

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I've heard concerns... ...that some of these tolling authorities have bond covenants or contracts that
  • OK, so the state issues the debt under bond? Well, no.
  • So the state gives them the authority to issue, they give them the bonding authority to issue the debt
  • was the whole concept around tolls, is that they can be self-sustaining because they pay for, they bond
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 5/6/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • Section 8 of article 7 raises the State Agricultural Society's debt limit for state fair bonds from $30
  • agricultural society's debt limit for<00:23:18.400> state<00:23:18.640> fair<00:23:18.960> bonds
  • from<00:23:19.600> 30<00:23:19.840> million<00:23:20.159> up for state fair bonds
  • from 30 million up for state fair bonds from 30 million up to<00:23:20.559> 50<00:23:20.880><
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The bonded title process provides opportunities for title disputes, fraud, and vehicle theft.
  • Once approved, the title bond is valid for three years. Within that time...
  • And then also make sure that there's a bond in place just in case. That's exactly right.
  • This pertains to the permitting of the over axle tolerance and the bonds that we have.
  • There won't be an 84,000-pound limit because you're no longer recognizing that bond.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 3/4/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bonding request was at $5.7 million and has now gone up to $6.2 million.
  • The city is prepared to match the bonding amount.
  • The city is prepared to match the bonding amount.
  • We appreciate all of you taking the time to hear our bonding request.
  • <01:00:38.920> tour October 2023 during your bonding tour October 2023 during your bonding
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Chairman, Senate Bill 386. of and relates to bond requirements for certain judges.
  • .. guardian properly and cause serious loss to a guardianship estate, the damages are covered by a bond
  • If the loss exceeds the bond, the judge can be held personally liable for the difference.
  • Under current law commissioners courts are required to execute a bond of at least $100,000 for Counties
  • Lost to the guardianship of state is far greater than the bond provided for by the county.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Taxation and Revenue Feb 14th, 2026 at 10:35 am

House Taxation & Revenue

Transcript Highlights:
  • It has a bond bill capacity totaling approximately $392.5 million for three bond issues.
  • So with this, the bonds. So with this, the bonds, that's different than capital outlay.
  • with the last bond sale, has started taking a little bit of a different approach to selling the bonds
  • How often do we do general obligation bonds? Chair, how often do we do general obligation bonds?
  • The bonds are paid off.
Bills: HB248, HB309, HB332, SB48
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Taxation and Revenue Feb 13th, 2026 at 08:35 am

House Taxation & Revenue

Transcript Highlights:
  • It appears to have to do with whether or not there's an outstanding bonded indebtedness.
  • Is there a bond related to all MRAs, Mr.
  • , Representative, so in the MRA statute, what we call a property tax abatement is referred to as a bond
  • But in the development of our abatement program, we have used what are the bond sections of the original
Bills: HB248, HB309, HB332, SB48
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 1st, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Because the bonding company wants to surrender the bond. Right. And are you defense counsel? Yeah.
  • that they want to surrender the bond.
  • Is the purpose of this bill to make sure that a person that's on bond stays on bond?
  • The bonding company wants to get off of the bond. I mean, I'm not aware where they have to do it.
  • Like, how come the bond is so low?
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Transportation Funding Apr 14th, 2025

S/C on Transportation Funding

Transcript Highlights:
  • the cards and can keep coming at the voters until they relent, just like they did to me. ...do for bond
  • RMAs to backstop loans for bonds for local government road projects, both toll and non-toll, may sound
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Alcohol, Tobacco and Controlled Substances REVISED: SB1501 - Added Apr 8th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Alcohol, Tobacco and Controlled Substances

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill was a bond bill.
  • We have tried for years to get a bond bill passed and so we sent over to the senate a bill that's a $2,000
  • Members, SB1242 was another version of the bond bill, so I have simply taken that language out.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/27/2026 - House Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Transcript Highlights:
  • Madam Chair and members, House Bill 2098 modifies the bonding authority and public hearing notification
  • So after a number of years, we finally were able to pull together a bonding company, sit down, and really
  • have a project, particularly on the infrastructure side of things, we will be able to have a way to bond
  • I have another board member from the PICWA organization here, and we also have the bonding company that
  • It allows the Pinal County Augmentation Authority to actually bond and go help find new water, like the
Summary: The committee first received an update from Arizona Department of Water Resources Director Tom Buschatzky on Colorado River negotiations and post-2026 operating rules. He described the legal framework governing Arizona’s allocation, argued that Arizona and the lower basin have already made substantial conservation cuts, and said the upper basin is pressing positions Arizona views as inconsistent with prior Supreme Court rulings. He emphasized the need to move water from upstream reservoirs to Lake Mead, warned of continued shortage risk, and said the state is seeking an equitable deal through ongoing federal and interstate negotiations. Members asked about outside water use, tourism and recreation impacts, and tribal water rights, including the Navajo-Hopi-San Juan Southern Paiute settlement. Buschatzky said the state’s delegation and bipartisan support have been helpful and urged continued public and legislative backing. The committee then heard House Bill 2758, which would expand McMullen Valley groundwater transportation authority and add related requirements and guardrails, including an amendment increasing the La Paz County transportation cap from 10% to 50% of the annual volume and adding conditions for sales or leases from historically irrigated acres. Supporters, including bill sponsor advocates, the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, and the Home Builders Association, said the bill would create a lawful, regulated transfer option similar to the Harquahala model, support housing growth, and include oversight through hydrologic studies, pumping limits, and monthly reporting to ADWR. Opponents, including La Paz County Supervisor Holly Irwin’s statement, local residents, Sierra Club, and rural advocates, argued the bill would accelerate aquifer depletion, harm private wells and subsidence conditions, and benefit a New York hedge fund at the expense of rural communities. After debate, the committee adopted the Griffin amendment and then passed HB 2758 as amended on a 6-4 due-pass vote. The committee next took up House Bill 2098, which would modify bonding authority and public hearing notice requirements for county water augmentation authorities and allow local repayment agreements with WIFA. Pinal County Supervisor Stephen Miller and other supporters said the bill would clean up statutory language so the Pinal County Water Augmentation Authority can finance future water augmentation and infrastructure projects, including potential Bartlett Dam-related work, and better prepare for future Colorado River uncertainty. The Home Builders Association also supported the bill, saying it included proportionality protections for private utility water charges. The bill was moved for a due-pass recommendation and the committee proceeded to a roll call vote, with the transcript ending before the final vote result was shown.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs May 6th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill clarifies the limitations on the district's authority to issue bonds secured by ad valorem
  • improvements through assessments, fees, or taxes, all subject to voter approval or through the issuance of bonds
  • approve an application for housing tax credits for development financed through the private activity bond
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Cap Committee Meeting - 2025-04-30

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you so much for this opportunity to present our request for $34.8 million in bonding funds for
  • bonding committees.
  • In state bonding locally since 2021, we've locally bonded $3.4 million through debt levies and. operating
  • Funds, trail funds, anything else since there are so many projects out there for bonding?
  • As Chief Raines and I talked about, I would love to be on the bonding committee.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 4/30/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • Paul Colleg's bonding funds for the St.
  • bonding committees.
  • > both<00:32:02.880> bonding received visits from both bonding received visits from both
  • <01:01:44.160> Uh Um and um so why state bonding? Uh Um and um so why state bonding?
  • can do it with bonding fund here. can do it with bonding fund here.