Transcript Highlights:

• Secretary: Substitute for Senate Bill 108, a bill to be entitled an Act relating to administrative procedures
• This bill creates a nonjudicial procedure for a property owner to request the county sheriff remove an
• This procedure is like procedures in existing law for the removal of an unauthorized person from a residential
• Here is a bill on watching paint dry for those who love the Administrative Procedures Act.
• If a mandatory delegation of rulemaking persists at the time the agency withdraws the proposed rule,

Keywords: 998, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ADDITIONALLY, IN THE HOSPITAL RULE UNDER 5983 WE ARE OUTLINING THE LICENSE PROCEDURES FOR OUR HOSPITALS
• IT MUST INCLUDE PROCEDURES THAT ENSURE ACTIONS WERE WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH FEDERAL IMPALA LAW.
• PROCEDURES TO EDUCATE PATIENTS ON THE APPROPRIATE SETTING FOR THEIR HEALTHCARE NEEDS AND CAPABLE OF ALSO
• PHYSICIAN OFFICES WHERE ONE OR MORE DO THIS PROCEDURE MUST HAVE PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY COVERAGE OF AT
• ADDITIONALLY, A PHYSICIAN WHO PERFORMS A LIPOSUCTION PROCEDURE CAN BE FINED $5,000 PER PROCEDURE WHERE

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <02:47:13.279> have know how many of these procedures have know how many of these procedures
• be able to perform these procedures. be able to perform these procedures.
• procedures that are defined in statute. procedures that are defined in statute.
• HB 349 applies minimum procedures for optometrists to gain surgical procedures.
• c> for applies minimum procedures for applies minimum procedures for optometrists<03:21:28.000>

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Why would we be showing videos about a specific medical procedure?
• Why would we be showing videos about a specific medical procedure?
• in the different types of procedures in the different types of procedures that<00:13:56.959>
• surgeries and early abortion procedures surgeries and early abortion procedures that<01:11:55.440
• It does require the balloting and budget procedures that exist today under the alternative procedure

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 662, which would require public schools to include discussion of abortion procedures and show specified videos in health education classes. The prime sponsor argued the bill would ensure students receive medically accurate, age-appropriate, and nonpolitical information about abortion, saying the topic is important for informed decision-making and should be taught consistently statewide. He said the videos were intended for grades 9-12, that parents could opt out, and that the requirement was meant to supplement, not sway, students’ views. He also acknowledged the bill could be seen as limiting local control over curriculum and said the intent was to prevent the topic from being missed due to scheduling disruptions. Committee members questioned the sponsor about local control, the need for a video mandate, the source of his statistics, whether the bill could be biased or inflammatory, and whether the requirement should apply every year in high school. The sponsor said the videos were only a starting point, could be replaced by others, and were meant to be informational. He also said the bill was not intended to influence students’ decisions about abortion. Several supporters testified in favor, including representatives of New Hampshire Right to Life and others who said students should be told the “truth” about abortion and its consequences. They emphasized graphic or emotionally difficult aspects of abortion and argued that young people need this information to make informed choices. Opponents and skeptical witnesses raised concerns about prescribing curriculum, eroding local control, and the appropriateness of the material for younger high school students. The New Hampshire School Administrators Association said the bill was overly prescriptive, that health education standards are already set by the State Board of Education, and that the topics in the bill are not part of the current standards. That witness recommended the committee consider retaining the bill for further work or making it less prescriptive. No vote or final committee action was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• There are some mandatory exceptions in the law.
• There<01:06:39.359> are<01:06:39.520> some<01:06:39.680> mandatory<01:06:40.240>
• exceptions<01:06:40.799> in There are some mandatory exceptions in There are some mandatory
• It also includes individuals eligible for a mandatory eligibility group, like non-MAGI individuals, and
• , training with counties, um procedures, training with counties, um solidifying<01:24:05.040> our<

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It says for example the not mandatory.
• As we saw against minimum mandatories.
• mandatory minimum for sale of fentanyl. mandatory minimum for sale of fentanyl.
• that uh gets rid of the mandatory that uh gets rid of the mandatory minimum.<02:56:52.720> You
• there is not a specific mandatory there is not a specific mandatory minimum<02:58:54.479> for

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• On to the second part, the mandatory waiting period: the proponents of this legislation claim it's to
• On to the second part, the mandatory waiting period: the proponents of this legislation claim it's to
• On to the second part, the mandatory waiting period: the proponents of this legislation claim it's to
• <00:47:58.400> waiting and mandatory waiting and mandatory waiting periods<00:48:00.559>
• He spent five years in jail because it was a mandatory minimum.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• On line 288, Senate File 1719, a task force on mandatory minimum sentencing, is Senate only at $133,000
• It establishes a task force on mandatory minimum sentences.
• It establishes a mandatory<00:36:15.920> minimum<00:36:16.400> sentence<00:36:16.800>
• > of<00:36:17.119> 10<00:36:17.359> years mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years mandatory
• minimum sentence of 12 years a mandatory minimum sentence of 12 years for<00:36:25.040> a<00:

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• And now on to our procedural motions.
• Madam Majority Leader, you are recognized for your procedural motions. Good morning.
• AB 1721 is a bill that will strengthen and streamline school planning procedures.
• Madam Majority Leader, you are recognized for your procedural motion.
• This bill closes enforcement gaps by requiring mandatory summary discipline.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Summary: The Assembly met on May 7, 2026, after an initial delay due to lack of quorum, then proceeded through a long House of Origin deadline session focused mainly on floor votes for dozens of bills. The day opened with prayer, a moment of silence for victims of a hate-motivated shooting at an Islamic Center in San Diego, and a warning to visitors about disrupting proceedings. Leadership repeatedly urged members to be on time and at their desks as the chamber worked through a large daily file. The bills considered covered a wide range of topics, including artificial intelligence, community college trustee compensation, transit camera enforcement and privacy, taxation and excess proceeds claims, HOA rules, hepatitis C treatment access, child care planning, greenhouse energy standards, consumer lending, housing and homelessness, pet spay/neuter access, local financing for workforce housing, student financial aid, DUI penalties, senior housing, foster youth, behavioral health licensing, transit stop data, disaster response for child welfare, elections notices, safe surrender for infants, college enrollment and leave policies, insurance regulation, fair funding, school safety, environmental labeling, cash rounding, park passes through libraries, grocery access, pregnancy protections in education, swatting, domestic violence protective orders, farmworker housing, juvenile justice, cervical cancer screening, Medi-Cal transitions, disability certification, and home protection products. Most authors described their bills as cleanup measures, consumer protections, access expansions, or targeted fixes to existing law. Testimony from authors and supporters emphasized access, safety, affordability, and administrative simplification, while a few bills drew policy concerns or opposition, especially AB 1751 on townhome development and labor standards. That bill prompted extended debate over wages, prevailing wage, and stakeholder engagement, but it ultimately passed. Other notable discussion included AB 1628 to extend California’s safe surrender window for infants, AB 1902 on juvenile detention extension hearings, and AB 1925 on permanent disability certification, each framed as addressing difficult real-world gaps in current systems. The chamber took many roll-call votes, with most measures passing overwhelmingly and several by unanimous or near-unanimous margins. A few bills were temporarily passed, retained on file, or moved to the inactive file, and AB 1534 required the call to be lifted and then passed on a 54-8 vote. Overall, the session was dominated by floor action on the daily file rather than committee reports or gubernatorial messages, and the Assembly advanced a large number of bills on a deadline day.

Transcript Highlights:

• The second statute is RCW 26.44.030, which establishes the responsibility for mandatory reporters to
• Number two, meaningful access and a procedure that is...
• Number two, meaningful access and a procedure that is cemented in the principles of fairness, equity,
• There's some mandatory classes that they might want you to take.
• And, you know, so we kind of resort to the civil rules of procedure for moving to dismiss these cases

Summary: The committee held a work session on tort liability and parole, with the chair explaining that the topics were linked because criminal justice reform and state liability often intersect, especially in cases involving child welfare and corrections. Staff first outlined Washington’s tort liability framework, including the state’s broad waiver of sovereign immunity, statutes governing mandatory reporting and investigation of abuse, the childhood sexual abuse statute of limitations, and the lack of caps on non-economic damages. Staff and presenters also compared Washington to other states and noted that Washington remains among the broadest states for state liability and childhood sexual abuse claims. Presenters from the Attorney General’s office, Washington State Association for Justice, DCYF, DSHS, and DOC discussed how tort exposure has grown, especially in claims involving DCYF, historical child abuse, juvenile rehabilitation, vulnerable adults, employment discrimination, medical negligence, and negligent supervision. DCYF and AG staff said claims and payouts are rising, with many claims tied to older abuse and new theories of liability, while defense counsel emphasized the human harm behind the claims and argued that tort cases have historically driven accountability and reform. Agency witnesses said they face large volumes of old claims with limited records, rising verdicts and settlements, and staffing and systems challenges, and they highlighted efforts such as early resolution programs, electronic health records, medication-assisted treatment, and improved incident review processes. The committee then shifted to parole. Sentencing experts reviewed Washington’s move from indeterminate sentencing to the current determinate sentencing system under the Sentencing Reform Act, and explained how parole could be integrated with sentencing guidelines through different models used in other states. They also summarized Criminal Sentencing Task Force recommendations related to a determinate-plus approach for three-strikes and persistent offender laws and a second-chance review process, noting there was no consensus on those ideas. Judges from the Minority and Justice Commission and the Superior Court Judges Association said a parole system could support rehabilitation and reduce disparities if it includes data collection, fairness, transparency, due process, and meaningful judicial review; they also pointed to research suggesting parole and structured reentry can reduce recidivism and costs, while warning that access and outcomes can vary by geography and other factors.

Transcript Highlights:

• So the question that I have is there's an entire subchapter on procedures, settings, rules for litigation
• when government immunity is there's an entire subchapter on procedures, settings, rules for litigation
• These procedures address rules on venue, settlement, payment of judgments, levying taxes for paying final
• procedures in the bill. Any reason why? Senator Menendez, not being a lawyer myself as well.
• Part of HB 4 is eliminating the mandatory requirement of social studies assessments.

Bills: HB4, HB20

Keywords: district composition, congressional election, Texas, legislature, voting districts, fraudulent solicitation, disaster relief, nonprofit organizations, criminal penalties, consumer protection, fraud prevention, charitable donations

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 2853, which would allow the UT System Board of Regents to adjust the University of Texas at El Paso student union fee above the current statutory cap, subject to student approval, to help fund a new student union building. Senator Blanco explained the bill and the committee substitute, there were no questions or witnesses, public testimony was closed, and the committee adopted the substitute and left the bill pending subject to the call of the chair. The committee then heard House Bill 610, which would limit severance payments for terminated independent school district superintendents to six months’ salary and benefits. Senator Paxton described large severance payouts and said the bill had passed the House overwhelmingly. There were no witnesses, public testimony was closed, and the bill was left pending. A lengthy hearing followed on House Bill 4623, which would waive school district immunity in certain cases involving negligent hiring, supervision, or employment of professional school employees who commit abuse or related misconduct against students. Senator Paxton and several witnesses, including survivors and parents, argued the bill was needed to address cover-ups, delayed reporting, and repeated failures to remove dangerous employees; some members raised concerns about liability caps, litigation, and how the bill would interact with the Tort Claims Act. The committee also heard from TEA staff and employee-group witnesses who discussed possible injunctions and stronger no-hire protections. Public testimony was then closed and the bill was left pending. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 4, an accountability and assessment bill that would restore A-F ratings, change the state testing system, and replace STAAR with shorter, more instructionally useful assessments. Senator Bettencourt explained the committee substitute, including annual ratings, limits on taxpayer-funded lawsuits, and a phased-in testing redesign with beginning, middle, and end-of-year assessments. Testimony was generally supportive from education and business groups, though some witnesses favored norm-referenced testing while others emphasized criterion-referenced, TEKS-aligned assessments; one witness noted social studies assessments were restored in the bill. The hearing concluded with additional invited testimony and no final vote reported in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• Dressing, dressing as the opposite sex, taking hormones, having surgical procedures, nothing ever changes
• I know because I had an abortion procedure, and I have serious regrets because Just as the pill, I was
• No accurate numbers are available due to the procedure being performed by women typically in their home
• The pre-litigation discovery provided for in this legislation results in mandatory responses to demands
• What should have been a heartbreaking but straightforward medical procedure to prevent infection and

Bills: HB7, SB 8

Keywords: abortion, healthcare, jurisdiction, civil action, qui tam, prohibition, state law, sex designation, restroom access, civil penalties, private civil right of action, women's privacy

Transcript Highlights:

• Those sorts of standardized medical procedures would probably allow us to buy and take some of those
• by nature, regardless of that particular woman, she will be treated with the same policies and procedures
• She will be treated with the same policies and procedures as being in a medium-security prison.
• This is nationwide—700% increase—mandatory drugs, zone law, all the craziness of tough-on-crime, which
• I would say one, Senator Brownsberger, I can thank for, and colleagues, mandatory release to supervision

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The commission on correctional consolidation and collaboration heard testimony focused on how Massachusetts uses custody levels, staffing, programming, and medical release tools, with Prisoners’ Legal Services arguing that the system is overusing expensive high-security settings and underusing step-down options. Dave Rainey said the incarcerated population has dropped substantially over the last several years, but spending and staffing have not fallen in proportion. He argued that DOC overclassifies people into medium and maximum security, relies too heavily on behavioral assessment units that function like segregation, and keeps people in restrictive settings such as Souza-Baranowski and Shattuck Hospital longer than necessary. He also said medical parole is underused and that many people with serious chronic illness or advanced age pose little public-safety risk and should be released through existing legal pathways. Sheriffs and other commission members pushed back on some of those points, emphasizing that staffing needs are driven by the acuity of the current population, that corrections is not overstaffed, and that classification decisions involve serious public-safety judgments. They also stressed that some high-cost medical placements are necessary because people remain under sentence and require care, and that furloughs and other release tools can create security risks if contraband or substance use is involved. The discussion also covered the role of county sheriffs versus DOC in reentry, with several members saying county systems tend to do more day-to-day step-down and release planning, while DOC has more difficulty moving people through lower-security settings before release. Ben Foreman of MassINC offered a more systemwide, data-focused perspective, praising the state’s transparency and arguing that Massachusetts has made major progress in reducing incarceration and increasing public safety. He said the state still has an opportunity to improve by right-sizing facilities, investing in community-based mental health treatment, and using the commission to better understand the capital and operating costs of the current system. In response to questions, he said he was aware of DOC studies on programs like furlough but had not reviewed recent ones, and he noted that total-control facilities like Souza-Baranowski have long been criticized in the research literature for poor outcomes. Nora Wassel of the Women and Incarceration Project then testified that the commission should issue an interim report and scrutinize the planned new women’s prison, which she said is not justified by current population trends or available data. She argued that women are overclassified under DOC’s own tools, that reentry beds and minimum-security placements are underused, and that the system may be failing to account for women’s distinct medical and reentry needs. The meeting ended with continued discussion of reentry, furloughs, day reporting, and whether consolidation should mean fewer facilities, better step-down pathways, or both.

Transcript Highlights:

• compilation of information, and yet some of the interests where their settlements asked not to have mandatory
• talked with the author's office, about capturing settlement data, and we're not experts in civil procedure
• It's not totally our expertise on the civil procedure side as far as what lawyers...
• We honored the request of some of the opponents of not making it mandatory for providing the data of
• As a result, they did not want the mandatory reporting of evidence.

Summary: The committee heard several bills, with most drawing support after amendments or ongoing stakeholder negotiations. SB 29, by Senator Laird, would extend a sunset on the law allowing pain-and-suffering claims to survive a plaintiff’s death; supporters, including a family member describing a medical negligence case, labor groups, consumer advocates, and disability and elder organizations, argued it prevents defendants from running out the clock, while hospitals, medical groups, and business organizations warned of higher costs and added liability. After extensive debate about data collection, settlement reporting, and the impact on health care access, the bill passed to Appropriations on a divided vote. SB 294, by Senator Reyes and presented by Senator Laird, would require employers to notify a worker’s emergency contact if the worker is arrested or detained and would create a template to inform employees of state and federal labor rights. Labor and worker advocates said the bill would help workers understand and enforce their rights amid weakened federal enforcement; there was no opposition on file, and the bill passed unanimously to Appropriations. SB 697 would modernize water-rights adjudication by allowing the State Water Board to use technology instead of requiring in-person field investigations; with no opposition, it also passed unanimously. The committee also advanced SB 37 on attorney advertising, SB 645 on peremptory challenges in civil cases, SB 303 on bias-mitigation trainings in public workplaces, and SB 464 on expanding pay-data reporting for specified state workers. SB 37 drew support from consumer and legal groups but concerns from Walker Advertising about joint advertising; members said negotiations were ongoing, and the bill passed. SB 645 would extend anti-bias jury-selection rules to certain civil rights cases; criminal-defense and defense groups said they were close to agreement, and the bill passed. SB 303 and SB 464 were both amended to narrow scope and moved forward after several opponents shifted to neutral or removed opposition. The committee also approved a consent calendar of additional bills, all sent to Appropriations.

Transcript Highlights:

• So any questions on process or procedure?
• So any questions on process or procedure?
• The military member is subject to mandatory recall.
• The military member is subject to mandatory recall.
• The military member is subject to mandatory recall.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The meeting began with committee process reminders from the chair, including rules for questioning witnesses, time limits for testimony, and how motions and committee reports are handled. The chair also discussed the committee’s history, emphasized a cooperative approach with agencies and the Judiciary, and noted that a special committee on the Family Division of Circuit Court had previously done useful work; he said a new subcommittee could be appointed later to continue looking at judicial-system issues. He also mentioned that the Speaker’s office was expected to name members to the DHHS oversight committee by Friday at 1. The substantive presentation was from the Department of Health and Human Services’ Bureau of Child Support Services. Attorney John Williams introduced the bureau team, and Bureau Chief Lisa Dekowski described the program’s mission: encouraging responsible parenting, family self-sufficiency, and child well-being by locating parents, establishing paternity, setting or modifying support orders, and enforcing court-ordered child and medical support. She said the bureau operates statewide under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act, works with courts, employers, and other partners, and serves both in-state and out-of-state cases, with some international and tribal coordination. She also cited program scale, saying the bureau dispersed about $76 million to families in New Hampshire in fiscal year 2023 and that most collections go directly to families. Members asked about enforcement tools, especially passport denial. In response to a question about a case involving a very small shortfall, the bureau said the federal passport-denial threshold is $2,500 in arrears, not a few cents, and that denial remains in place until the balance is resolved or an arrangement is made with the agency, with hardship factors potentially considered. The bureau also explained that either parent can apply for services when a child support order exists and that the bureau can help initiate income withholding orders. No votes or formal actions were taken during this portion of the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• It is mandatory, and it goes back for more than four decades.
• It is mandatory, and it goes back for more than four decades.
• It is mandatory That registry is public.
• <00:52:02.559> for<00:52:02.800> the practice and procedure for the practice and procedure
• Um, I haven't looked into the mandatory requirements. >> Any further questions?

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Bills: HB3767, HB3934, HB4199, HB4336, HB2947, HB3834, HB4302, HB4095, HB3287, HB3649, HB4430, HB4431, HB2059, HB3647

Keywords: dentistry, licensing, dental hygiene, foreign-trained dentists, temporary license, public health, emergency response, child care, workforce, pilot program, affordable care, income eligibility, interventional pain management, pain management clinic, chronic pain, acute pain, spinal injections, epidural steroid injection, peripheral nerve block, nerve ablation

Bills: HCR11, HCR181, HCR187, HCR47, HCR44, HCR161, HCR102, HCR107, HCR118, HCR42, HCR176, HCR84, HCR94, HCR195, HR14, HR171, HR177, HR43, HR40, HR151, HR94, HR99, HR110, HR38, HR166, HR76, HR86, HR185

Keywords: charter schools, facilities, school funding, education, Hawaii, student enrollment, policy change, HCR181, House Concurrent Resolution, Department of Education, DOE, temporary positions, position renewal, superintendent-level positions, legislative intent, statutory interpretation, budget accountability, fiscal oversight, government transparency, state employment

Bills: HB62, HB124, HB182, HB193, HB198, HB203, HB223, HB237, HB469, HB486, HB574, HB779, HB796, HB919, SCR2, SB4, SB36, SB38, SB109, SB152, SB168, SB195, SB216, SB221, SB236, SB404

Keywords: Louisiana Women's Policy, gender equality, policy research, commission membership, women's representation, Domestic Violence, judicial experience, legislation, criminal law, family law, HB182, sexual assault, rape kit, forensic examination, forensic medical exam, sexual assault survivor, sexual assault nurse examiner, SANE, emergency department, hospital staffing

Transcript Highlights:

• running for mayor both received the same amount of votes, and state law contradicted itself on the procedures

Bills: HB117, HB17, HB22, HB153, HB140, HB117, HB17, HB22, HB153, HB140, SB12, SB42, SB93, SB28, SB35, SB134, SB12, SB42, SB93, SB28, SB35, SB134

Keywords: procurement, county commission, administrative savings, public services, government efficiency, HB17, municipal audits, municipal audit clarification act, municipal finance, local government, city council, mayor, city manager, Department of Examiners of Public Accounts, independent public accountant, annual audit, biennial audit, annual report, financial accountability, public records