Transcript Highlights:

• <00:49:06.079> to duty to the existing duties is to duty to the existing duties is to evaluate
• the use of an indexing storage evaluate the use of an indexing storage credit<00:49:09.160> model
• I had a strikeout of ‘evaluate pilot programs for energy storage,’ yeah, yeah.
• Evaluate the use of IND—that stays, but the indexing is added, right?
• the use of IND yeah yeah um evaluate the use of IND that<00:51:30.480> stays<00:51:30.839>

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Independent third-party evaluation offers decisive advantages over traditional regulatory models.
• Setting advanced AI safety standards takes deep, current expertise in model evaluation, red teaming,
• would be seven political appointees, none required to have standard-setting experience, asked to evaluate
• These assessments mandate that developers must systematically evaluate... risk assessments.
• These assessments mandate that developers must systematically evaluate how their platform design impacts

Summary: The committee heard several bills focused on artificial intelligence, child safety, mental health, and privacy. SB 574 by Senator Umberg would require transparency and human oversight when attorneys, judges, and court neutrals use AI; it drew support from privacy advocates and committee members, with no opposition. SB 1276, the End Child Exploitation Act, would update child sexual exploitation laws to cover live-streamed and AI-generated abuse material and clarify that viewing such content can be criminally punishable; prosecutors, child advocacy groups, and others supported it, while no one appeared in opposition despite opposition on file. SB 813 would create a California AI standards and safety commission and a voluntary two-tier certification framework for AI safety standards; supporters said it would create scalable, independent oversight, while TechNet and CalChamber opposed it as duplicative, under-defined, and likely to create a de facto mandate. The committee discussed market pressure, federal preemption concerns, and the role of voluntary standards, but no final vote was taken in the excerpt. Senator Padilla also presented SB 300, which would strengthen protections for minors from sexually explicit chatbot content by moving from a reasonableness standard to an affirmative duty to prevent such exposure and to prohibit facilitation. Supporters said new evidence showed greater risks and that companies can and should build stronger safeguards; opponents, including TechNet and CCIA, argued the bill was premature because SB 243 had only recently taken effect and warned it could create strict-liability-like exposure. Padilla then presented SB 903, which would bar AI chatbots from being advertised as therapists, require licensed clinician oversight and informed consent for AI use in psychotherapy, and protect patient confidentiality; it received broad support from mental health professionals and labor groups, while industry and health associations were opposed unless amended over triage and crisis-detection language. The committee members emphasized the need for human judgment in mental health care and noted ongoing negotiations on amendments. The committee also heard SB 1119, a companion to AB 2020, which would require annual risk assessments, crisis-response protocols, default child settings, parental controls, limits on data use, public incident reporting, and third-party audits for chatbots used by children. Supporters argued the bill would address documented harms and improve transparency, while industry groups objected to ambiguous standards, liability exposure, and the private right of action. A roll call vote was taken on SB 1119 after quorum was established; the motion to pass to Appropriations succeeded on a 5-1 vote, with one no vote and the measure left on call for absent members. Finally, SB 354, a privacy bill for insurance consumers, would modernize outdated insurance privacy rules, bar sale of personal information, and expand consumer rights to know, correct, and delete data. Supporters said it would implement Proposition 24’s privacy mandate, while a large coalition of insurers, agents, brokers, and related businesses opposed unless amended, mainly seeking a small-business exemption and narrower treatment of publicly available information; members and the author said negotiations were ongoing and the bill had already been substantially revised.

Transcript Highlights:

• And doesn't the courts refer those folks to the state hospital for evaluation?
• But the state hospital, we do pay forensic evaluators to conduct the Title 7 evaluations that are referenced
• But the state hospital, we do pay forensic evaluators to conduct the Title 7 evaluations that are referenced
• to conduct the title 7 evaluators to conduct the title 7 evaluations<01:03:20.240> that<01:03
• that are referenced in this evaluations that are referenced in this bill<01:03:22.000> and<01

Bills: SF0032, SF0010, SF0001, HB0001

Keywords: 911 services, emergency response, grant funding, next generation technology, government accountability, public safety, mental health, detention, competency evaluation, treatment, contractual agreements, Wyoming, budget, funding, education, wildfire prevention, healthcare, community colleges, grants, economic development

Transcript Highlights:

• Have we evaluated everything that we could have evaluated out there? And so, Mr.
• Have we evaluated other alternatives.
• <00:32:54.240> have<00:32:54.399> evaluated everything that we could have evaluated
• everything that we could have evaluated out<00:32:55.360> there?
• property taxes and and having evaluated property taxes and and having evaluated that<00:33:34.080

Bills: SF0061, SF0098, SF0110

Keywords: sales tax, motor vehicle, family transfer, tax exemption, Wyoming legislation, veteran, property tax exemption, Wyoming National Guard, honorable discharge, tax benefits, surviving spouse, military service, property tax, residential real estate, tax assessment, primary residence, tax revenue, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:22:48.799> We assess or evaluate staff performance.
• We assess or evaluate staff performance.
• annually annually it it evaluates annually annually it it evaluates whether<00:44:56.800> the
• Um, and we are evaluating what is happening in the state.
• Um, and we are evaluating what is happening in the state.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The informational briefing focused on the Office of the Auditor’s recent audit of Hawaii’s deposit beverage container program and the Department of Health’s response. State Auditor Les Condo reviewed the program’s structure, noting it was created to increase recycling and reduce litter, but said prior audits have repeatedly found weak internal controls, reliance on self-reported data, and an “honor system” approach. He cited examples of underreporting and overpayment risks, including a Whole Foods settlement and secret-shopper testing at a redemption center where the program reimbursed more than what was actually paid to consumers. Condo said the special fund continues to grow, increasing by more than $12 million between FY24 and FY25, and that the 2024 audit found no meaningful progress in implementing earlier recommendations. He also noted that many prior recommendations were later codified in law, including risk-based audits and internal control requirements, and said the office will audit the program again in about a year. Senator Fevella said the briefing was needed because he has seen little progress over the years and emphasized the program’s goals of reducing litter and promoting recycling. He noted that Hawaii has lost a glass recycler, underscoring broader challenges in the system. Department of Health Deputy Director Kathleen Hoe said the department is committed to addressing longstanding problems and said the director’s office meets with the program twice a month. Program staff outlined steps being taken to respond to the audit, including revising accounting and inspection/enforcement manuals, retaining third-party services, and implementing risk-based audits of distributors and redemption centers. They said internal control process documents from distributors were due June 30, with about 200 received and roughly 100 still outstanding, and that enforcement letters are being sent. The department also described plans for electronic reporting to reduce manual entry and improve accuracy, as well as a broader legislative proposal for a tiered audit system. Under that proposal, larger distributors would remain subject to the current every-other-year audit requirement, middle-tier distributors would be audited every five years, and smaller distributors would be exempt. Officials said the governor had temporarily waived enforcement of the 2025 independent audit requirement because of cost concerns for smaller distributors, while the department reviews submitted audits and considers a longer-term fix. No votes or formal committee actions were taken during the informational briefing.

Transcript Highlights:

• So I think the question that we want to evaluate and present back to the full committee is whether any
• > recom<00:11:40.560> and<00:11:40.800> and<00:11:41.120> present to evaluate
• Um what it says is to look at existing and new revenue options and evaluate them on five points.
• Um what it says is to look at existing and new revenue options and evaluate them on five points.
• the notion that the court will evaluate the notion that the court will evaluate all<00:47:35.119

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Education Funding Committee Subcommittee on Adequacy and Funding Sources opened its second meeting by reviewing four retained bills assigned to it: HB 651, HB 772, HB 491, and HB 734. The chair said the goal was to compare the bills across the board, consider whether any one of them should be the committee’s recommended vehicle, and then vote on a recommendation to the full committee. He noted the bills would move out before November 21 and be taken up on the House floor in January, while related LSRs were also being developed for the coming session. Representative Ames argued that HB 651 should be the main vehicle because it would substantially raise the adequacy base and adjust differential aid categories to better reflect real school costs, including poverty, special education, and English learner needs. He described the bill as building on court guidance and said the current funding formula is far below actual district needs. He also supported HB 491 as a study vehicle to examine revenue options, saying the legislature needs informed choices about how to pay for the changes. Representative Damon strongly backed HB 651 and HB 491, citing constitutional obligations, the Conval and Rand rulings, and large projected funding increases for districts such as Claremont, Windham, and communities in the chair’s district if HB 651 had passed earlier. Representative Fellows said he has an LSR similar to HB 491 that would study existing and new revenue options using criteria such as revenue potential, administrative cost, affected groups, implementation timeline, and implementation cost, with input from revenue administration and outside agencies. Representative Papich Muller emphasized constitutional separation-of-powers concerns, reading Article 83 and saying he was not comfortable with the broad claim that “cherish” clearly mandates a specific spending level, though he said he intends to follow Supreme Court guidance. Representative Ricky read testimony from a local school board member arguing that the state already imposes many mandates on schools while providing the least funding in the country, and that HB 651 would help restore meaningful local control. No final vote or action was taken in the portion provided, though the chair had indicated the subcommittee would vote before adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• We were very pleased in evaluation.
• This is an incredibly complex grant with extensive reporting and evaluation requirements.
• extensive reporting and evaluation extensive reporting and evaluation requirements.<00:26:53.440
• understand and track um our evaluation understand and track um our evaluation and<00:37:02.480><
• and and happy to have a and evaluation and and happy to have a conversation<00:39:33.040> about

Keywords: 918, senate, all

Summary: The Select Subcommittee first took up adoption of three previously prepared nonpartisan committee summary reports dated October 15, November 13, and November 21. Senator Rasmusson objected to the lack of advance notice about the day’s testifiers and criticized the practice of having nonpartisan staff summarize what he described as a partisan agenda. The chair responded that the committee’s purpose is to gather information, not hear bills, and that the summaries were intended as neutral resources for the Senate. Senator Coopek moved adoption, the motion was opposed by Rasmusson and another member, and the motion passed. The committee then turned to the day’s hearing on federal impacts on Minnesota, with the chair focusing on federal funding threats and the effect of congressional budget actions on health care, especially in greater Minnesota. The first presentation came from the Minnesota Department of Health on the state’s rural health transformation work. Assistant Commissioner Carol Broom introduced the team and described the rural hospital transformation program as a major opportunity to invest in rural health, while acknowledging longstanding challenges such as demographics, transportation barriers, and the financing of care. Nitha Moibi outlined the state’s rural health chart book and data showing an aging population, workforce shortages, and many health professional shortage areas, and described proposed strategies including workforce pipelines, bridge payments for low-volume birth hospitals, telehealth access points, mental health urgent care, and chronic disease prevention. Acting Assistant Commissioner Anna Ashby of the Minnesota Management and Budget office explained the state’s application to CMS for the Rural Health Transformation Program, which was created in federal law and awarded Minnesota just over $193 million for federal fiscal year 2026. She said the application was shaped by public comments, stakeholder meetings, and legislative outreach, and included initiatives on preventive care, workforce, care access, behavioral health, and provider financial stability. She also reviewed implementation constraints, including a January 30 revised budget deadline, limits on administrative spending, restrictions on using funds to offset Medicaid losses, and the need to show measurable progress to remain eligible for future funding. The presentation noted that most year-one funding would go to rural hospitals, with additional support for federally qualified health centers, community mental health centers, tribal partners, and technical assistance.

Transcript Highlights:

• the proposals On th that be evaluating the proposals On th that criteria<03:15:23.319> needs<
• identify deter and then recover evaluate identify deter and then recover on<03:32:49.720> fraud
• How do you evaluate that?
• And when you're thinking of their capacity, I mean, that's partly evaluated in their response to our
• That's the way that we, you know, evaluate whether or not there's success of that.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: Finance Division 3 met for a work session on House Bill 519, which concerns funding for Waypoint. The chair noted general support for the organization but said the bill would likely need to be suspended and folded into the budget process because the committee did not yet know available revenues or what amount, if any, could be committed. Kya Fox, director of the Division for Behavioral Health, testified that the department supports the bill and the program, explaining that it had been funded with other available funds, including $100,000 for 2024 and $400,000 for 2025, under a contract running through June 30 of this year. She said the shelter serves a unique population of young adults and is part of the department’s children’s system of care and Mission Zero efforts to reduce barriers to psychiatric discharge and emergency department use. Members questioned Fox and Waypoint representatives about the budget placement of the request, the difference between the efficiency budget and prioritized needs, and whether state budget documents would show any internal Waypoint revenues. Fox said the request appears as a general fund item and that the state would not see Waypoint’s internal financial operations in the budget. A legislative member explained that prioritized needs are critical services already in place but not necessarily included in the efficiency budget, and another member said the distinction is not strictly applied. The committee also raised a separate question about how DHHS would handle any future state or federal restrictions on DEI practices; Fox said that was a question for department leadership and legal staff, but that the department follows state law and contract requirements. Waypoint CEO Bor Alvare and Director Mandy Lancaster then described the shelter and related services. They said the shelter serves ages 18 to 24, is a 14-bed open-room facility with half walls, and is staffed overnight by two full-time workers. They said admission is first come, first served, with some vulnerability factors considered, and that they do not discriminate by race, gender, or sexual orientation. They reported no known incidents of sexual violence, though some youth are turned away each night because the shelter is full. They also explained that Waypoint provides broader services beyond the shelter, including outreach, drop-in centers, housing support, rental assistance, and family mediation, and said they serve about 400 youth and young adults in Manchester alone. The discussion ended with questions about whether lowering the upper age limit would affect the program; Waypoint said most residents are already in the 18-to-23 range, but that housing shortages make the current age span important for helping young adults avoid chronic homelessness.

Transcript Highlights:

• Again, I haven't evaluated it. It won't be me; my job to evaluate.
• Again, I haven't evaluated it. It won't be me; my job to evaluate.
• to evaluate one size doesn't fit all. to evaluate one size doesn't fit all. Right?
• I I don't know again I haven't evaluated I I don't know again I haven't evaluated it<02:16:33.519
• <02:16:35.120> but it won't be me my job to evaluate but it won't be me my job to evaluate

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• raise the standard by which we evaluate raise the standard by which we evaluate whether<03:47:05.040
• <04:16:49.920> So, evaluation committee. So, evaluation committee. So, >> yep.
• nexus I can see that the site evaluation nexus I can see that the site evaluation committee<04:20
• any role for the site evaluation any role for the site evaluation committee<04:20:48.560> to<
• <04:21:04.720> committee reason for the site evaluation committee reason for the site evaluation

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <01:17:33.000> issues parole process that evaluates issues parole process that evaluates issues
• I'm doing everything I can to stick to that. evaluation now the authors of this bill evaluation now the
• <06:01:18.600> would independent psychiatric evaluation would independent psychiatric evaluation
• This is part of the evaluation and assessment process.
• hospital this is part of the evaluation hospital this is part of the evaluation and<06:16:26.000

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I just want to point out it allows the use of audiovisual technology for mental health evaluations or
• be deprived of liberty, deprived of some of the rights of citizens based on the outcome of those evaluations
• be deprived of liberty, deprived of some of the rights of citizens based on the outcome of those evaluations
• really hurt folks. ...makes a very dangerous combination that could really hurt folks who are being evaluated

Summary: The House met, opened with prayer and the Pledge, approved the prior journal, and first took up a motion to request Senate consent for an extended adjournment. Representative Volk opposed the motion, arguing members should keep working on unfinished business, while Speaker Montenegro said the House had completed its current budget work and was waiting on the governor to return to negotiations. The motion passed 31-20, and the House also agreed to a related Senate adjournment request and to return HB 2415 to the Senate for reconsideration. The chamber then went into Committee of the Whole and considered several Senate bills. SB 1199, concerning the Salt River wild horse herd, was amended to pause removals for a genetic diversity study and received a do-pass recommendation. SB 1399 on Medicaid spending transparency, SB 1496, SB 1497, SB 1582, SB 1713, and SB 1798 were also amended and advanced. SB 1713 drew the most debate, with supporters saying it would expand pharmacist access to basic care and improve rural and veteran access, while opponents warned it expanded scope of practice beyond pharmacists’ training. The House later adopted the Committee of the Whole report, ordered several bills engrossed, and sent SB 1399 to third reading. In a second Committee of the Whole, SB 1214 and SB 1670 were further amended and advanced. The House then moved to third reading and voted on multiple bills. SB 1006, SB 1037, SB 1171, SB 1242, SB 1270, SB 1419, SB 1429, SB 1445, SB 1452, SB 1478, and SB 1566 passed, while SB 1099 and SB 1635 failed on the initial vote. Members then used reconsideration motions to place SB 1006 and SB 1635 back on the third-reading calendar. The session ended with personal privilege remarks recognizing correctional officers, Cinco de Mayo guests, Missing and Murdered Indigenous Peoples Awareness Day, and other tributes, followed by adjournment until June 1, 2026.

Transcript Highlights:

• And part of that is looking at the waste, fraud, and abuse, and re-evaluating the programs and make sure
• <00:09:52.200> um waste, fraud, and abuse, and um waste, fraud, and abuse, and um re-evaluating
• c> programs<00:09:55.720> and<00:09:55.880> make<00:09:56.040> sure re-evaluating
• the programs and make sure re-evaluating the programs and make sure they're<00:09:56.280> going

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The committee saw value in evaluating early restorative interventions and authorized a limited pilot
• c><00:20:35.200> saw<00:20:35.520> value<00:20:35.760> in<00:20:36.080> evaluating
• The committee saw value in evaluating The committee saw value in evaluating early<00:20:37.600><

Keywords: 926, house, all

Summary: The House opened with a devotional led by Rep. Bram Kleppner, who spoke about ethics, the virtues of kindness, wisdom, and courage, and offered an atheist’s prayer focused on those themes for legislative work. After the devotional, the chamber handled first readings of four bills: H.913 on prohibiting certain prediction markets securities, H.914 on compensating the city of Barre for an education property tax overpayment, H.915 on an extended producer responsibility program for beverage containers, and H.916 on education fund expenditures review. H.913 was referred to Government Operations and Military Affairs, H.914 to Ways and Means, H.915 to Ways and Means under House Rule 35A because it affects state revenue, and H.916 to Education. Members also made several announcements recognizing outside groups and events, including a Universal Health Care Caucus meeting, the organization Lond, visiting Vermont NEA educators for “Stand Up for Students Day,” a Federation of Sportsmen mixer, a Vermont State Employees Association reception and dinner, a Council of State Governments East reception, a mental health first aid class reminder, and State House apparel sales. The House then took up orders of the day, first postponing action on H.205, an act relating to agreements not to compete, for one legislative day. The chamber passed H.639 on genetic data privacy, H.694 on amendments to the Bennington town charter concerning the town manager, and H.907 on legislative review of reporting requirements. It then considered H.566 on sealing postcharge court diversion records upon successful completion. The Judiciary Committee explained the bill would replace expungement with sealing for juvenile and adult diversion records, add a limited Burlington Community Justice Center pilot for certain municipal ordinance violations, and align the law with prior record-clearance reforms; Judiciary reported it favorably 10-1. Ways and Means said removal of a proposed fee eliminated any fiscal impact and reported the bill ought to pass 11-0. The House agreed to the Judiciary amendment and ordered third reading. Finally, the House postponed H.635, which would eliminate Department of Correction supervisory fees, for one legislative day, heard additional announcements, and adjourned until Thursday, February 26, 2026 at 3:30 p.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• associated properties will assure clarity for the county assessor in reviewing the annual property evaluation
• We're... ...going to have to look at that special method evaluation, especially as, you know, big decisions
• And we went through his whole tax lightning thing with the special method evaluation and tax that, like
• And I hope that you, you know, lead the effort as we look at this special method evaluation, as we look

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• As I've evaluated the operation, I've been on the job for about two weeks.
• We're also evaluating policies and procedures to make sure that we have guardrails and guidelines. and
• We've done the evaluation of that particular school site, and it was a bear, believe me, but Our staff
• led to PSFA staff doing some analysis regarding the cost and sustainability, the lack of clear evaluation

Transcript Highlights:

• We have to re-evaluate the environmental aspects, and once we get that in place, we'll finish the acquisition
• That includes over 3,000 flood mitigation evaluations, over 600 flood mitigation projects, and nearly
• As noted on the slide, to break those down, the evaluations, which are studies, account for about $2.6
• Again, those evaluations or studies, the projects, or the strategies.

Keywords: 997, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The bill establishes requirements for rapid initial mental health evaluations by non-physician... professionals
• within 48 hours, integrates housing and homelessness services, and requires biannual reporting to evaluate
• That's where this donor questionnaire becomes very, very important, as we're evaluating the risk.
• Carter Blood Care evaluated all of this and decided that we wanted to provide the best blood to our patients

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• care of an individual when they do so. 39 5, 0, 7, 5, contemplates that now the department will evaluate
• wrongfully separated from their children for months, sometimes years while awaiting proper medical evaluations
• manner requiring the child protective team to consult when it experienced position or a PR in when evaluation
• medical diagnosis and many of these are diagnosed through X-ray, our imaging or, you know, physical evaluation

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• suggested that the plan be advanced no later than 90 days after the provider submits the initial evaluation
• 49.840> initial after the provider submits the initial after the provider submits the initial evaluation
• <00:02:53.200> It evaluation without any timetable. It evaluation without any timetable.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Labor and Technology Committee heard testimony on several bills, mostly related to workers’ compensation, labor relations, retirement, and employment exemptions. HB 423 would clarify selection of certified rehabilitation providers and require automatic approval of vocational rehabilitation services when likely needed for suitable gainful employment; the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations supported the bill but requested timeline amendments, including advancing the plan within 90 days of the initial evaluation and filing it with the employer, employee, and director within two days. HB 480 would let an attending physician request a functional capacity exam without employer permission and deem licensed occupational and physical therapists qualified to perform such exams; it drew support from the department, the Hawaii Insurance Council, and the Hawaii Medical Association. HB 162 would expand the pool of interest arbitrators for collective bargaining disputes by allowing the HLRB to request a list from FMCS as well as the ABA, and testimony from labor groups supported that change. HB 164 concerned indebtedness to the state and wage deductions; HGA supported it with comments, while the Department of Accounting and General Services raised concerns about the percentage structure but said it could implement the requested changes. The committee also heard HB 1152, which would permanently exempt three specialized Department of Taxation positions from civil service; the department supported the measure and said the positions are not currently civil service positions. HB 214 would allow certain retirees to work in school resource officer or investigator roles without losing retirement benefits, subject to conditions; ERS expressed concerns about shortening the required separation period from 12 months to 6 months and about uniform administration and cost implications, while the Department of the Attorney General and Department of Education supported the bill, and the Department of Law Enforcement asked to include its investigators as well. HB 874 would amend the Uniform Custodial Trust Act for child performers, requiring trust accounts for minors meeting certain earnings thresholds and making misuse of funds a fiduciary breach; SAG-AFTRA Hawaii, HGEA, the Hawaii State AFL-CIO, and the Hawaii Nurses Association supported it, and members discussed that enforcement would likely need further research, possibly through labor or the film office. HB 159 would cap the civil service exemption for personal service contracts with qualified community rehabilitation programs at $850,000 in the aggregate per private person or entity; United Public Workers, HGEA, and the Hawaii State AFL-CIO supported it. No final votes were taken because the committee lacked quorum. After recessing and reconvening, the chair announced that decision-making on the agenda would be deferred to Wednesday, March 12 at 3:01 p.m. in Room 224.