Transcript Highlights:

• I don't know why the OLA went to somebody who did a special audit.
• A special audit is just a small sample audit.
• who was who did a special audit. who was who did a special audit.
• <00:46:42.920> a<00:46:43.440> small<00:46:43.760> sample A special audit is
• just a small sample A special audit is just a small sample audit. audit. audit.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• to provide a detailed level of oversight of financial and audit matters.
• ,<00:57:56.000> uh<00:57:56.240> he Adam Edelen and his uh audit, uh he Adam Edelen
• and his uh audit, uh he basically<00:57:56.760> said<00:57:57.040> that<00:57:57.440><
• financial and audit matters. financial and audit matters.
• So, the Edelen audit in 2014, I was elected to the school board and started serving in 2015.

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We spend about six months out of the year in audit with as many auditors on site as we have financial
• four that not only are we audited four that not only are we audited annually<00:04:46.680> fairly
• opinion<00:04:53.200> with<00:04:53.360> no<00:04:53.640> written a clean audit
• opinion with no written a clean audit opinion with no written findings.<00:04:55.160> We<00:04
• with as many auditors the year in audit with as many auditors on<00:05:02.280> site<00:05:02.720

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• All those in favor of consent say I. >> I. >> Those opposing nay. money, we need to audit you. money,
• we need to audit you.
• And if the point is to audit and just sort of make sure everything looks right, then I think we could
• And if the point is to audit and there.
• And if the point is to audit and just<01:48:11.119> sort<01:48:11.280> of<01:48:11.360>

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• sales so that we can fund the auditing sales so that we can fund the auditing of<00:58:34.799>
• of that whole is to fund the auditing of that whole resale<01:12:42.000> program<01:12:42.520
• And when I listen to it, and when I'm hearing it, what is the difference between a resale audit and an
• c> it what is the difference between a it what is the difference between a resale<01:14:35.120> audit
• and an inspection at when resale audit and an inspection at when you're<01:14:37.880> reselling

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And between this committee, the audit commission, the feds coming in to prosecute, the last two years
• c><00:36:07.920> is<00:36:08.079> we<00:36:08.240> get<00:36:08.400> a audit
• commission which is we get a audit commission which is we get a specific<00:36:09.040> topic.
• 00:36:22.960> this<00:36:23.359> committee,<00:36:23.839> the<00:36:24.079> audit
• between this committee, the audit between this committee, the audit commission,<00:36:25.520>

Transcript Highlights:

• auditor office of legislative auditor office of legislative auditor legislative<01:21:19.400> audit
• ><01:21:19.679> commission<01:21:20.239> process<01:21:21.080> is legislative audit
• commission process is legislative audit commission process is beginning<01:21:21.679> for<01:
• The Office of Legislative Audit, the Legislative Audit Commission, The Legislative Audit Commission is
• If you have any questions about the audit commission, feel free to contact us.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• to provide a report 20 days prior to the 2027 legislative session, which may include a performance audit
• to provide a report 20 days prior to the 2027 legislative session, which may include a performance audit
• to provide a report 20 days prior to the 2027 legislative session, which may include a performance audit
• to provide a report 20 days prior to the 2027 legislative session, which may include a performance audit
• Which may include a performance audit of all exempt positions granted in this measure.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The joint committees on Labor and Technology, Transportation, and Culture and the Arts heard testimony on Senate Bill 396 and Senate Bill 47, then later the Labor and Technology committee took up Senate Bill 136 and Senate Bill 1523. SB 396 drew support from the Metropolitan Planning Organization and others, with a question raised about implementation costs; the director said costs would depend on the scope of the benefit package and the transportation mode involved. The committees recommended passing SB 396 with technical amendments and added appropriation language with a blank amount, and the motion was adopted by recorded votes in both committees. SB 47, which would designate the Lunar New Year as a state holiday, received support from the Office of Collective Bargaining and several individuals, including Charlene Chun, who spoke about family traditions and cultural recognition. Members asked about the cost and whether the day would be a paid day off for state employees; the response was that observance would be subject to collective bargaining. The committees moved SB 47 forward with amendments, noting the collective bargaining and cost issues, and adopted the recommendation by vote. In the Labor and Technology committee, SB 136 on the Iron Workers Stabilization Fund drew strong support from iron workers and related supporters, who argued the bill was about safety, training, and keeping dismantling work within the ironworkers’ trade. Several other unions, including operating engineers, carpenters, laborers, and plumbers and fitters, opposed the bill as too broad and potentially infringing on their jurisdiction. The measure was not decided in the portion provided, but members discussed possible amendments and jurisdictional concerns. SB 1523, which would expand private-sector collective bargaining rights under the Hawaii Employment Relations Act to include independent contractors and others under NLRB jurisdiction, received broad labor support, including from IATSE, AFL-CIO, Hawaii Nurses Association, Unite Here Local 5, and many individual testifiers. Supporters framed it as protecting workers’ rights and strengthening labor protections, while the Hawaii Labor Relations Board warned it could significantly increase workload and require more staffing, space, and operating resources; the board estimated the bill could expand its caseload substantially and suggested an appropriation would likely be needed. The committee then moved on to the next measure, SB 1440, before the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• I also wanted to take a moment to thank a lot of people in this room that participated in the audit since
• :57:49.079> the in this room that participated in the in this room that participated in the audit
• 57:49.720> this<00:57:49.839> bill<00:57:50.039> was<00:57:50.160> last audit
• since this bill was last audit since this bill was last introduced<00:57:50.760> in<00:57:51.200
• highlight that advanced practice nurses were added as a sole provider in Act 169 of 2009 without such an audit

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills related to cesspools, Red Hill cleanup, water testing, environmental governance, and beverage container recycling. For SB 472, SB 501, SB 675, and SB 958 on cesspools, most testimony supported accelerating cesspool conversion and expanding Department of Health capacity, though the Attorney General flagged a single-subject issue on SB 472 and the Department of Health and others raised concerns about funding, program structure, and coordination. Supporters emphasized cesspools as a major water pollution source and urged earlier deadlines, while some testimony questioned the tax credit approach and asked for clearer grant and staffing language. For SB 639 on underground storage tanks and Red Hill cleanup, the Department of Health asked for clearer cleanup standards and noted limits on laboratory detection and sampling, while supporters argued the bill would create a binding legal standard for remediation and help prevent reopening of the facility. Testimony also stressed the need to remove all contamination to the extent practicable and protect aquifers and drinking water. SB 664 on water quality testing drew strong support from residents and water advocates, but the Department of Health warned the measure could duplicate existing authority and create significant cost; the Board of Water Supply supported the concept while noting it would expand responsibilities into private-property testing. SB 674 on environmental advisory council and waste reduction received mixed testimony: supporters said it would help address landfill siting and protect water resources, while industry groups requested changes to advisory council membership and exemptions for certain products, and one witness opposed the measure. For SB 1067 on deposit beverage container recycling, the Attorney General said the grant language may be constitutionally problematic because it lacks standards, while industry testimony both supported the recycling goals and asked for amendments, including broader representation on the advisory council and clearer treatment of compostable and packaging-related issues. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• We know we still have problems with transfers, though, as we saw in the audit not long ago.
• As you may be aware, in July of 2023, after completing an audit of the CSU's handling of sexual harassment
• As we move forward, we will continue to build on the lessons learned from past audits in our program
• We will continue to build on the lessons learned from past audits in our program reviews, ensuring that
• So this has been in consultation with both the military department that does the audits as well as the

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Education Finance met to review CSU and State Library budget issues, enrollment trends, the Capital Fellows program, and a Title IX update. Chair David Alvarez opened by stressing that CSU faces serious financial pressure, including a systemwide deficit and proposed cuts that he and several members said were too large and likely to harm access, course offerings, and student services. Public comment focused heavily on the Braille Institute Library, with patrons, staff, veterans, and advocates urging restoration of funding and warning that the proposed cut would severely affect blind and visually impaired Californians across Southern California. Several CSU faculty, staff, and union representatives also opposed the proposed reductions and warned of larger class sizes, fewer sections, and layoffs. On the CSU core operations item, the Department of Finance explained the Governor’s proposal to reduce ongoing General Fund support by about $375 million and defer a 5% base increase, while the LAO said CSU core funding would be roughly flat once tuition and targeted augmentations were considered, but warned that rising costs and prior shortfalls would still force campuses to cut spending. CSU’s Chancellor’s Office said the proposed cut would deepen existing problems, citing prior-year budget gaps, job losses, reduced course sections, and student-service reductions. Members pressed Finance and the LAO on whether cuts could be made more surgically, especially at the Chancellor’s Office or in institutional support rather than in instruction, and the LAO said the Legislature has flexibility to target cuts more specifically. CSU also described ongoing consolidation efforts, including shared services among campuses and the planned Cal Maritime/Cal Poly San Luis Obispo integration, while cautioning that savings are not yet fully known. The committee then discussed CSU enrollment. The LAO recommended holding enrollment targets flat because the budget does not add new funding, while CSU reported strong recent growth, including more California residents, record first-year enrollment, and expanded direct admissions and transfer pathways. Members questioned why some campuses with high demand turn away many applicants while others continue to lose enrollment, and CSU said it is shifting resources from campuses with sustained declines to those with demand, using a 10% below-target threshold. The committee also discussed whether enrollment declines mirror local population trends, how to improve marketing and program alignment, and whether lessons from Cal Poly Humboldt’s conversion could inform other campuses such as Sonoma State. The Capital Fellows item drew a Finance proposal for a salary increase and an LAO counterproposal for a smaller raise plus future COLA language; the committee kept the item open. Finally, CSU reported progress on Title IX compliance, saying it has completed most State Auditor recommendations, expanded civil rights staffing, and increased training, prevention, and case-management efforts, though members asked how proposed budget cuts might affect those services.

Transcript Highlights:

• In addition, OPCN itself is reviewed annually by the Health Department and undergoes a financial audit
• I'm thinking about what we saw just a few years ago with an audit that showed something far different

Bills: HB2786, HB2787, HB2786, HB2787

Keywords: mental health, substance abuse, appropriation, state funding, emergency declaration, healthcare, State Department of Health, childbirth program, emergency funding, 914, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <02:36:43.359> Just additional auditing requirements.
• Just additional auditing requirements.
• It strengthens auditing, data programs.
• More specifically, the GAO identified 37 states with 162 TANF audit findings.
• audits and tax prosecution. audits and tax prosecution.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Wednesday, June 3, 2026, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• There are strict limits on sharing and retention, and there are required audits of the private vendor
• There are data practice audits that are required and full compliance with Minnesota data laws.
• <00:26:47.080> of<00:26:47.160> the uh and there are required audits of the uh and
• <00:26:59.280> that Um there are data practice audits that Um there are data practice audits
• audits upholding those data practices. audits upholding those data practices.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Finally, DHS contracts with a private sector vendor to audit the NEMT program.
• sector vendor to audit the NEMT program. sector vendor to audit the NEMT program.
• > information These audits compare billing information These audits compare billing information
• Their unannounced audits and up-to-date.
• Their unannounced audits provided<00:28:21.760> an<00:28:21.880> additional<00:28:22.320

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The committee met on March 2 and approved the February 23 minutes after a quorum was reached. The main presentation was from the Department of Human Services on non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT), a federally required Medicaid benefit that helps Minnesota Health Care Program enrollees get to medically necessary appointments. DHS said the program served more than 250,000 people in 2025 at a cost of $127 million, with participation up about 14% over five years, and described the seven transportation modes, provider enrollment requirements, STS certification, background checks, prior authorization rules, and planned transitions to a single administrator for parts of the program in 2026 and 2027. DHS officials emphasized fraud prevention efforts, saying NEMT is one of the agency’s high-risk Medicaid services. They described enhanced prepayment review, provider revalidation and site visits, removal of inactive providers, and a provider moratorium in metro counties. Inspector General James Clark said the governor’s anti-fraud proposal would add pre-enrollment risk assessments, more staffing and technology, and electronic visit verification. He also noted that about 80% of NEMT spending is in managed care and that managed care organizations have their own compliance and special investigations units. Committee members raised concerns about fraud, oversight, and privatization. Chair Robbins questioned DHS about the absence of the commissioner and the program’s use of brokers, citing past concerns and asking about the vendor MTM’s history; DHS said the RFP for the new broker had closed and the vendor selection was still underway. Representative Pinto questioned why oversight is outsourced to managed care organizations and suggested bringing more oversight back in house. MTM representative Phil Stahlberger defended the company’s record, said the Missouri dispute was about contract terms from about 15 years ago, and said MTM currently works in Minnesota counties and many other states, with on-site reviews, trip verification, and complaint review processes. No further votes or final actions on the NEMT policy were taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• <01:48:06.639> department<01:48:06.880> of in the department of audit department of
• in the department of audit department of audit<01:48:07.760> um<01:48:07.840> and<01:48
• um and get his master of business audit um and get his master of business administration<01:48:10.960
• state in 2011 in the department of audit state in 2011 in the department of audit and<01:48:18.560
• That was my entry-level job at the Department of Audit.

Bills: HB0130, HB0147

Keywords: Second Amendment, firearms, state rights, federal regulation, law enforcement, civil penalties, government liability, property tax, homeowner exemption, Wyoming, voter initiative, tax legislation, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• author amendment, an<00:23:49.600> independent<00:23:50.159> annual<00:23:50.640> audit
• an independent annual audit an independent annual audit demonstrating<00:23:52.000> proof
• to be done by of also requires an audit to be done by of those<00:59:37.680> commercial<00:59
• information is going to be in that audit information is going to be in that audit to<00:59:43.680
• to make sure that they are audit to make sure that they are complying<00:59:52.720> if<00:59:

Bills: HF357, HF3389, HF1434, HF2500, HF1606

Keywords: HF357, hasenpfeffer, card games, social skill game, Minnesota gambling law, tournament, contest, prize limit, low-stakes gaming, card game exemption, gambling exemption, cribbage, bridge, euchre, pinochle, Texas hold'em, whist, skat, sheepshead, gin

Transcript Highlights:

• that could include your payment error rate measurement audit, any audits from the Office of Inspector
• It possibly could include state audits as well.
• <00:33:09.919> Office<00:33:10.159> of audit, any audits from the Office of audit,
• any audits from the Office of Inspector<00:33:10.960> General.
• Um, and it include state audits as well.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee met and approved the minutes from its August 27 meeting. It then received a presentation from Katherine Castanza of the National Conference of State Legislators on the Medicaid provisions in the 2025 budget reconciliation bill, referred to as HR1. She explained that the bill is estimated by CBO to save the federal government $911 billion over 10 years, with more than 20 Medicaid-specific provisions, most of the savings concentrated in five policies and largely backloaded into 2030-2034. She emphasized that the bill’s effects will vary by state, but that expansion states and hospitals are expected to be most affected, in part because of changes to eligibility, provider taxes, and state-directed payments. Castanza highlighted several new funding and flexibility provisions, including a $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Fund for 2026-2030 and a new home- and community-based services waiver option effective July 1, 2028, with $100 million in grants in fiscal year 2027. She also outlined major eligibility changes for Medicaid expansion adults: work or community engagement requirements effective January 1, 2027; twice-yearly redeterminations for the expansion population effective the same date; and new cost sharing for certain expansion adults effective October 1, 2028. She noted that Kentucky, as an expansion state, would be subject to these changes and that state agencies would face significant implementation demands, especially because federal guidance and timelines are tight. A substantial portion of the presentation focused on financing changes. Castanza described new limits on provider taxes, including a 0% safe harbor for new taxes and a phased reduction for existing taxes in expansion states beginning in 2028, while nursing facilities and intermediate care facilities are exempt from the reduction if already taxed. She also explained that state-directed payments will be capped and phased down over time, with existing arrangements grandfathered only briefly; she said Kentucky has 11 approved state-directed payments and could see significant fiscal effects. She added that the bill also bars Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood or similarly situated providers for one year, changes immigrant eligibility rules effective October 1, 2026, lowers the federal match for certain emergency services, and expands the scope of the federal erroneous payment recoupment provision effective October 1, 2029. Throughout, she stressed that federal savings may translate into state cost shifts and that implementation timing will be critical.

Transcript Highlights:

• Audit aimed at identifying designs and features contributing to its spread.
• AB 1394's audit requirements were constructed to ensure... Moderation.
• If the committee finds it necessary to impose a third-party audit requirement, we suggest that it's on
• More concerning, however, is the requirement that these audits be made public.
• More concerning, however, is the requirement that these audits be made public.

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills related to reproductive access, child safety online, immigration enforcement in schools, health privacy, location data, digital provenance, reparations, and age assurance. AB 54 would protect the medication abortion supply chain and shield providers and others from liability; AB 1137 would strengthen reporting and enforcement tools for child sexual abuse material on social media; AB 49 would limit ICE activity at California public schools; AB 82 would expand privacy and safety protections for gender-affirming care patients and providers; AB 1355 would restrict the collection, use, and sale of precise location data; AB 853 would expand provenance requirements for AI-generated and authentic content; AB 62 would create a pathway for restitution for racially biased eminent domain takings; and AB 1043 would create a device-based age assurance framework for online services. Supporters generally framed the bills as necessary responses to current harms: reproductive rights advocates emphasized California’s role as a safe haven; child safety witnesses described the persistence and re-victimization caused by CSAM online; immigrant rights and education advocates said schools should remain safe from immigration enforcement; health and LGBTQ+ advocates stressed privacy and safety risks tied to tracking and harassment; privacy and consumer groups backed limits on location data and stronger provenance tools; and reparations advocates said AB 62 would help address historic injustices. Opposition came from family policy, tech, business, law enforcement, and industry groups, who raised concerns about safety claims, constitutional issues, implementation burdens, transparency, law enforcement access, and the need to preserve existing privacy frameworks and voluntary standards. The committee members largely expressed support for the policy goals while noting implementation concerns on some measures. Several members asked for or were offered coauthor status on bills. AB 1137, AB 54, AB 49, AB 82, AB 1355, AB 853, and AB 62 all received do-pass votes to Appropriations, with some members voting no or not voting on certain bills. AB 1355 and AB 853 were advanced with amendments or ongoing work promised with opponents, and AB 1043 was presented with discussion of possible amendments on parental consent and age assurance details, though the transcript cuts off before final action on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• And then, Commissioner, if you would just briefly explain the last pages, the new audit unit that you're
• And then, Commissioner, if you would just briefly explain the last pages, the new audit unit that you're
• /c><00:49:44.760> you're<00:49:45.040> proposing<00:49:45.760> and ...and the audit
• On page 13, then, is the new corporate franchise tax division pass-through audit.
• so simply this have a sales tax audit so simply this Clarity<01:15:25.880> is<01:15:26.000>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Summary: The committee met to hear a presentation from the Commissioner of Revenue on Governor Walz and Lieutenant Governor Flanagan’s tax proposal, with members told no public testimony would be taken because bill language was not yet available. The commissioner said the proposal would lower the statewide sales tax rate by 0.75 percentage points while expanding sales tax to selected professional services such as legal, brokerage, banking, and accounting, with several carve-outs. He emphasized that the plan would not add business-to-business sales taxes, arguing that taxing business inputs leads to tax pyramiding and higher hidden consumer costs. The commissioner said the rate cut would be the first sales tax rate cut in state history and estimated it at about $95 million annually, while the service expansions would raise about $203 million to $205 million annually, for a net increase of roughly $110 million per year. He said the proposal is part of the governor’s broader budget, which he described as addressing long-term structural deficits and funding other priorities such as an R&D credit, an expanded sustainable aviation fuel credit, fraud prevention, and service-member retention bonuses. He also said the carve-outs and exemptions would be reflected in the revenue estimate. Members questioned whether the proposal was truly a tax cut or instead a tax increase, and several asked for a revenue-neutral rate if all or more services were taxed. One member raised concerns about how pro bono legal work with a fee would be treated, and another asked about possible streamlining issues and whether fees are treated as taxes in statute. The commissioner said a fee would be taxable depending on the arrangement and that the department would review the language carefully once drafted. He also said the department would provide more detailed estimates later, including what the rate would be if the tax were made revenue neutral. No votes or formal actions were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• But there's also the requirement to report and the ability to audit these things.
• And then it's auditable.
• And I would reemphasize this particular entity has nothing but clean audits in every state they operate
• registered in Oklahoma as a nonprofit with the Secretary of State's office serving Oklahoma women, and the audit

Bills: HJR1101, SB1319, SB1264, HB4237, SB1277, SB2069, HB3066, HB2115, HB2153, HB2268, HB2961, SB1679, SB2018, HB4294, SB2095, HB4113, SB1894, SB1810, HB4268, HB1752, HB3413, SB625, HB3644, HB3940, HJR1096, HJR1100, HJR1099, HB2992, SB1636, HB4302, SB1613, SB1443, HB1409, HB1675, HB1225, HB1381, HB4359, SB1503

Keywords: SB1319, Corporation Commission, Oklahoma, remediation, environmental emergency, brine contamination, oil contamination, oilfield pollution, residential property, home buyout, property acquisition, fair market value, revolving fund, remediation fund, state plugging funds, well plugging, abandoned well, natural breakout, Department of Environmental Quality, DEQ