Transcript Highlights:

• The next section, section 3, has to do with the State Board of Investment.
• And then if you go to section 16 on line 7.6.
• Section 2 deals with percentages for pension plans.
• Section 5 deals with data sharing. Section 6 deals with legislative and budget proposal data.
• Section 11 deals with employee contributions.

Bills: HF2783, HF2603, HF2846, HF2354, HF1836, HF2713, HF1198, HF1389

Keywords: state government finance, biennial budget, appropriations, Minnesota Management and Budget, Healthy Aging Subcabinet, Office of Healthy Aging, older adults, aging policy, long-term care, caregivers, public health, Medicaid fraud, medical assistance fraud, attorney general subpoena power, fraud enforcement, business filing fraud, Secretary of State, deceptive mailings, consumer protection, certified public accountant

Transcript Highlights:

• Then, um, one of the other concerns, which is in section five and section seven, subdivision five, in
• 7 which is in section five and section 7 which is in section five and section 7 uh<00:03:44.720>
• two Minnesota statutes insert section two Minnesota statutes 2024<00:56:56.640> section<00:56
• subject to oversight under this section subject to oversight under this section for<00:57:13.920
• uh it just states that in section 9 uh uh it just states that in section 9 uh this<01:32:28.600> section

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• All right, section C. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Section C.
• Section D. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, we’re in Section D.
• Section G. There are no objections. The items have been reviewed. Section G. Mr.
• Section H. Thank you, Mr. Chair. We're in Section H.
• Section H has been reviewed. Section I. Thank you, Mr. Chair. We're in Section I.

Summary: The committee met with a quorum, opened with a prayer recognizing the death of Reverend Jesse Jackson, and then worked through a series of appropriation and transfer requests. In Section B, it approved a $273,000 temporary appropriation for the Department of Labor and Licensing. In Section C, it approved two Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act requests: $280 million for the Department of Transportation and $195 million for the State Broadband Office to support Arkansas BEAD broadband grants, including an extra help position. Members questioned the broadband awards, provider amendments, buildout timelines, accountability, and the status of unawarded locations; the broadband director said no provider had requested speed changes, awards would be monitored with milestone-based payments, and remaining locations would be addressed later as federal guidance is received. The committee also approved transfers in Section D, including $458,000 for the Department of Correction, $25 million for Department of Education programs such as declining enrollment and teacher incentive funding, and $229,000 for Shared Administrative Services project management support. In Section E, the committee considered a $4.7 million budget stabilization trust fund loan for the Office of State Technology to implement ServiceNow and related IT modernization, cybersecurity, and governance tools. Members pressed agency officials on repayment, cost savings, and whether the loan would simply roll over existing costs; officials said repayment would come through agency rates over a five-year period and that the new payment would be lower than the current loan being retired. The committee voted to give favorable advice to the Governor on the loan request. In Section F, the committee reviewed cash fund requests for wage and hour claims, unclaimed property, and a heritage grant; in Section G, it reviewed a $1.1 million federal grant to expand college and career coaching in rural districts; in Section H, it reviewed pay plan and performance fund requests totaling millions across multiple agencies; and in Section I, it reviewed budget manual formatting changes. The latter part of the meeting focused on reports, especially the Medicaid trust fund. DHS and DFA officials reported the fund balance had declined from prior years and was down to about $394 million after seven months, with further decline expected by year-end. Senators and representatives asked about the appropriate reserve level, the impact of pending Medicaid rules and legislation, FMAP changes, and whether additional funding would be needed in the upcoming budget. Officials said projections are updated regularly, more than 10 rule packages remain pending with CMS, and the governor and legislative leaders will discuss additional capital needs during budget development. Members also discussed the importance of balancing Medicaid spending with new federal funding and maintaining flexibility for critical areas such as labor and delivery. The committee then adjourned without further action on the reports.

Transcript Highlights:

• If you move down to the next section titled "Sections 5, 6, and 7," these are your non-recurring below-the-line
• Daniel, if you'll take us on to the next section... you.
• You'll get to a section called research agenda.
• sections.
• A table of contents for the data section.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• If you move down to the next section titled Sections 5, 6, and 7, these are your non-recurring below-the-line
• Some of these things are also in their non-recurring section.
• And Statewide Education Governance section.
• Sections. So essentially, here's the issue at hand.
• Section.

Transcript Highlights:

• Sections 7 through 11 on section.
• reserve under this section. reserve under this section.
• section uh subchapter into subchapter 1. section uh subchapter into subchapter 1.
• 6VSA chapter 37 sections 681 and 686. 6VSA chapter 37 sections 681 and 686.
• section 7 amending the effective dates. section 7 amending the effective dates.

Keywords: 926, house, all

Summary: The House began with several announcements and recognitions, including a lengthy tribute to Representative Carolyn Brangan of Georgia on her retirement and years of service, followed by remarks from Brangan explaining that she is leaving to care for her husband during cancer treatment. Additional members offered brief reflections, including one on the end of the session and another welcoming students from Founders Memorial School to the gallery, and a member from Brattleboro highlighted a collaborative mural in the card room titled “These Green Hills, Vermont State Symbols and Personal Reflections.” The body then took up its calendar. It adopted Joint House Resolution 12, authorizing limited remote voting in joint committees through the remainder of the calendar year, with an ADA-related accommodation for members physically present but unable to access a meeting room. The House also suspended rules to take up and concur in the Senate amendment to House Bill 935 on emergency management. The committee report described grant programs for emergency response and technical rescue, new definitions and shelter-planning language centered on “whole community,” a wildland fire response task force, and an emergency rulemaking provision requested by the Agency of Natural Resources; the committee approved the Senate proposal on an 8-3 straw poll, and the House concurred. The House next adopted the conference committee report on House Bill 952, the capital construction and state bonding budget adjustment bill. The report explained changes made in conference, including shifting funds to cover a higher-than-expected bid for the St. Johnsbury facility, restoring some funding for maintenance at the women’s correctional facility in Chittenden County, and setting aside $750,000 toward planning for Wi-Fi installation in correctional facilities. It also noted a lease-related language change for a Vermont Huts project at Little River State Park, with notification to the institutions committee chairs. The House then took up Senate Bill 64 on optometrists’ scope of practice; the committee presentation supported allowing specially credentialed optometrists to perform certain minor surgical, laser, and injection procedures, citing improved access, safety, cost, and workforce development, and the bill was read for second reading with committee recommendations for concurrence.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:27:03.520> 302 the bill for example in um section 302 the bill for example in um section
• mean in the the news these new sections mean in the the news these new sections are<00:28:02.120
• <00:28:22.440> that sure that the the new sections that sure that the the new sections that
• Oh, no, no, section number four—on section three.
• section three it becomes a non-issue in section three it becomes a non-issue in this<01:29:43.040>

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Education heard several Department of Education-related bills and received extensive testimony on school meals and veteran diplomas. HB 628 would restore authority for the Department of Education to issue high school diplomas to veterans whose schooling was interrupted by World War II, the Korean War, or the Vietnam War. The superintendent testified in support, explaining the authority had sunset in 2020 and describing the measure as a way to recognize veterans. No opposition or questions were raised, and the bill was left without further action in the excerpt. The committee also heard HB 1074 and HB 110, both supported by the Department of Education and the School Facilities Authority. HB 1074 was described as a cleanup measure to clarify land-related language and make the statute more consistent across state agencies and DOE. HB 110 concerned benchmarking and the farm-to-school/local food effort; DOE and several supporters, including county councils, the Hawaii Public Health Institute, the Hawaii Farm Bureau, and the Hawaii Farmers Union, said the bill would help align metrics and support the 30% local food goal by 2030. Members questioned DOE about progress, and DOE said it was working on menus, procurement, and coordination with distributors and farmers. A Farm to School representative said the current bottleneck was poor communication with farmers and the need to bring them into planning earlier; DOE said it was still figuring out the process and that island-based procurement and separate RFPs were being explored. HB 328, relating to school meals and local resource food and plant-based options, drew the most testimony. DOE testified with comments, and the Attorney General’s office suggested revisions to clarify that the bill would apply to both DOE and charter schools, to separate public and private funds if donations or grants are accepted, and to add standards if nonprofit or private entities receive public money. Supporters included HSTA, the Hawaii Public Health Institute/Farm to School Network, Climate Protection Hawaii, the Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council, and numerous individuals and organizations. Supporters emphasized healthier school meals, student-requested plant-based options, support for local farms, and the 30% by 2030 goal. Some testimony urged more local purchasing and raised concerns about decentralization, while DOE said it was considering island-based procurement and separate contracts to better support local producers. No votes were taken in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• and also to add a new section. and also to add a new section.
• sections of this bill for consistency. sections of this bill for consistency.
• ><01:15:50.320> HB2323 from section 3 of HB2323 from section 3 of HB2323 to<01:15:52.640> replace
• We'll delete new sections<01:19:40.480> 302A-J sections 302A-J sections 302A-J on<01:19:42.800
• c> retire employment under that section or retire employment under that section or employee<01:20:02.880

Bills: SB3082, SB3110, SB3251

Keywords: military families, family leave, qualifying military exigency, Hawaii Revised Statutes, financial support, Hawaii National Guard, civil-military program, education, collective bargaining, exemption, SB3251, Hawaii public safety, ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Border Patrol, law enforcement hiring, state employment ban, police powers, Department of Law Enforcement, DLNR

Transcript Highlights:

• section from No, no, I I got that part. section from No, no, I I got that part.
• I'm bothered by section B.
• Uh, so on page 41, we'll go section by section real quick.
• section six is the Habitat license fee. section six is the Habitat license fee.
• That's section six, excuse me, section six.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first revisited HB 781, the cell phone bill, after previously retaining it. On reconsideration, members moved to OTP the bill, and it passed unanimously. The committee then moved into the budget tracking packet and adopted an amendment to HB 2 to add the same cell phone policy language, also unanimously, and separately reduced HB 1 by $1 million to match the policy change. Members noted the cell phone language had already been stripped of grant funding language in the House version and that the policy and funding pieces were being aligned across the budget bills. The committee then took up a Department of Education technical amendment to HB 2 on charter school grants, which made timing and administrative changes without altering grant amounts, and adopted it unanimously. Members also discussed but held other education-related items, including adequacy grants, pending broader decisions on overall education funding. Another HB 2 item concerning E-911/state police radio communications prompted a longer discussion about whether E-911 surcharge funds were being used for purposes that should instead be general-funded. After debate over whether to leave the current practice in place or split the funding 50/50 between E-911 and general funds, the committee adopted a joint HB 1/HB 2 change to shift the funding source to a 50/50 split and delete the HB 2 language authorizing the prior use; the motion passed 7-0. The committee also discussed but did not act on several lottery-related provisions, including the video lottery terminal amendment, the increase in maximum ticket price from $30 to $50, and related tax split changes, with members planning to hear from the Lottery Commission on Monday. The meeting ended with the committee beginning review of new amendments in the tracking packet, including a Department of Education request related to Public School Infrastructure Commission grant administration, but no action was taken on that item in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• So in section one, we have several places.
• In section two, line 397, we changed shall to may. Mhm.
• So in section one, we have several places.
• In section one, we have several places.
• Section 6, line 211, is cleanup.

Keywords: Medicaid - Room 210; 2 February, 2026: 2:30 PM, 925, all

Summary: The committee first took up a placeholder bill related to the Medicaid “L tax” for long-term acute care hospitals. The sponsor explained that these hospitals pay into Medicaid but do not receive Medicaid reimbursement, and said members had reached a general consensus that a solution is needed. The bill was described as a dummy bill with no firm language yet, and the committee adopted a motion for title sufficient do pass; the bill was reported despite one opposing vote. Members then heard a detailed explanation of the committee’s Medicaid technical bill. The sponsor said it was much lighter than in prior years because of uncertainty around federal Medicaid conditions and the lack of a signed bill in recent years. Most changes were described as federal-language updates, cleanup, or department-requested revisions, including changes from “shall” to “may” to give the department more flexibility, shortened notification and care-period timelines, and removal of outdated provisions. Substantive items mentioned included allowing the department to review value-based payment models, adding pediatricians to a covered list, increasing ambulatory surgery center reimbursement from 80% to 85%, approving “treat in place” for ambulances, allowing supplemental payments to hospitals, and reestablishing the Medical Advisory Council. After brief questions, the committee adopted a motion for title sufficient do pass on the tech bill and reported it, again with one opposing vote. The chair then announced a follow-up hearing for the next day at 1:30 p.m. in Room 216 on the L tax, the hospital bed tax, a Medicaid 101 overview on hospital financing, and a briefing on nonopioid medications and a device intended to prevent or reduce epilepsy seizures.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'll point to section 11, which does have some prohibition of transfer.
• Section six of the bill: we're just updating some of the updates in section six.
• <01:04:00.559> 12 candidates um then finally in section 12 candidates um then finally in section
• <01:04:44.680> 14 disclaimer on those as well section 14 disclaimer on those as well section
• <01:04:55.279> 15 amendment um and then section 15 amendment um and then section 15 material

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• other is section-by-section analysis.
• to say that the section a section analysis controls.
• analysis is consistent, but conflicts with other parts of the bill analysis. the section-by-section
• of intent is inconsistent with the section by section. analysis so it's not hypothetical it's it's a
• by section analysis will control over any other section within the bill analysis.

Bills: SB5, SB11, SB12, SB9, SB42, SB15, SB5, SB11, SB12, SCR1

Keywords: hemp regulation, consumable products, cannabinoids, occupational licenses, criminal offenses, SB 11, Texas attorney general, election crimes, election law enforcement, criminal prosecution, Election Code, Government Code Chapter 402, local prosecutors, county attorney, district attorney, grand jury, probable cause reports, state election offenses, voter fraud, election integrity

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:02:48.680> 248A extended the Section 248A extended the Section 248A telecommunications
• participate in the Section 248a process. participate in the Section 248a process.
• This proposed amendment would change the Section 248 sunset date from July 1, 2029 to July 1, 2027.
• citizens do not understand the Section citizens do not understand the Section 248<00:10:07.160><
• To guarantee the legislature will address these issues with Section 248A sooner versus later.

Keywords: 926, house, all

Summary: The House took up House Bill 527, which extends the sunset of 30 V.S.A. Chapter 248A governing telecommunications siting. The House Energy and Digital Infrastructure Committee explained that the House version would have extended the process through 2030 and required a Public Utility Commission stakeholder process, but the Senate instead shortened the extension to July 1, 2029 and added immediate statutory changes: written notice to municipalities and regional planning commissions, a required public meeting before filing applications, attendance by the applicant and the Department of Public Service, and other transparency measures. The committee recommended concurrence with the Senate amendment on a 6-3 straw poll. Representative Pritchard of Poultney then offered a further amendment to shorten the sunset further, from July 1, 2029 to July 1, 2027. He argued that the Section 248A process has long-standing problems, that rural towns lack resources to participate effectively, and that the legislature should address the issue sooner rather than continue extending the sunset. He cited concerns from Tinmouth and the Westmore tower case, and requested a roll-call vote. Supporters of the Senate position responded that the Senate changes would provide immediate improvements and that a shorter sunset could create risks by expediting more permits and worsening the situation. The committee reported its view that the Pritchard amendment was unfavorable by a 6-3 vote and asked the House to vote no on it. After that exchange, the House stood at ease and then went into recess for a caucus.

Transcript Highlights:

• In section 3, section 2 Oh, I'm sorry.
• through uh section 3. through uh section 3.
• Um, section after the word 'section' and remove reasonable attorney fees.
• section section after<01:30:21.120> the<01:30:21.200> word<01:30:21.400> section
• this section. this section.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Sections 1, for hospital transitions.
• Section not a long-term care provider.
• Section four requires those services.
• Uh section four, as providers.
• :24:38.400> sections<01:24:38.800> three deleting sections two and sections three deleting

Bills: HF2216, HF1978, HF2354, HF1963, HF1994, HF1995, HF1894

Keywords: assisted living, nursing home, long-term care, guardian, conservator, resident rights, arbitration, mandatory arbitration, consumer protection, fee increase, rate increase, price hike, private pay, public funds, Medicaid, waiver services, elderly, seniors, older adults, disability rights

Transcript Highlights:

• The addition that had been asked for as section two should have been renumbered to section three.
• , which should be section three.
• two, which should be second section two, which should be section<00:23:46.480> three.
• section three. section three.
• Section 2B, 2C, and 2D are sections that were added at the suggestion of Representative Summers.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Madam Chair, members, there are two sections, sections 8 and 9 of the miscellaneous article, and these
• section section um<00:09:47.400> of<00:09:47.520> the<00:09:47.640> Bureau<00:09
• <00:10:07.440> of<00:10:07.520> the sections, section eight and nine of the sections
• <00:10:20.440> 10, Madam Chair and members, sections 10, Madam Chair and members, sections
• Uh, section 10. Um, section 10, interest on loans secured by rural or agricultural property.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So section three clarifies that.
• Current section seven, it would become section five, repeals a section of law that was last touched in
• Current section seven, it would become section five, repeals a section of law that was last touched in
• Current section seven, it would become section five, repeals a section of law that was last touched in
• Current section seven, it would become section five, repeals a section of law that was last touched in

Bills: HF1151, HF1239, HF1240, HF2020, HF2514, HF2515, HF2451

Keywords: Compensation Council, salaries, state officials, judicial compensation, legislative process, public funds, misuse, law enforcement, accountability, state government, legislative auditor, compliance, transparency, retirement benefits, health insurance, dependents, state employees, Medicare, legislative studies, government oversight

Transcript Highlights:

• by section.
• Moving on to section 2 on page 2, that section is simply an update.
• On to the next section of this would be section 15-18.3-03.
• On to the next section of his would be section 15-18.3-03.
• Section 8 is a repeal section.

Summary: The committee met to discuss higher education funding and capital building policy. Members first heard an update from NDUS Deputy Commissioner Lisa Johnson on low-producing academic programs. She described a proposed board policy using a five-year rolling window and thresholds of fewer than 10 undergraduate graduates or fewer than 5 graduate graduates, with programs flagged for three consecutive review periods going to the board. Possible outcomes would include continuation, continuation with modifications, inactivation, or termination. Members asked about how the review would account for program costs, service to other students, workforce demand, and the difference between inactivation and termination. Johnson said the board would consider broader factors and that campuses already do detailed program analysis. Several members also asked about cost savings and staffing impacts from program terminations, and Johnson said the board would try to provide more information later. The committee then received a report on the Capital Building Fund from Jamie Wilkie. He reviewed the program’s history, matching requirements, and recent uses, noting that about $334 million in state and matching dollars has been invested overall, with most going to deferred maintenance and extraordinary repairs. Members discussed whether the program is reducing deferred maintenance and requested updated systemwide data on deferred maintenance and campus space utilization. Wilkie said the board is considering a new study to update deferred maintenance figures, which are based on information more than 12 years old. He also reported that several institutions have used current biennium funds for projects such as residence hall renovations, health sciences housing, generators, and building repairs. Later, the committee began a detailed walkthrough of a draft bill that would replace the current higher education funding formula with an FTE-based model and also revise the capital building fund structure. The draft would use fall enrollment FTEs, add completion incentives for degrees in in-demand fields, and create a separate research funding component for UND and NDSU tied to doctoral completions and external research expenditures. Members raised concerns about the use of older data in the formula, the treatment of waivers, the weighting of professional and health sciences programs, and the use of CIP codes to define CTE and education incentives. The bill draft would also combine capital building fund tiers, broaden eligible uses for deferred maintenance and legislatively authorized projects, change matching requirements, repeal the old formula chapter and the capital pool, and transfer funds from the Strategic Investment and Improvements Fund into the capital building fund. No final votes were taken during the portion provided; the meeting was primarily discussion and review.

Transcript Highlights:

• the changes made in section 15.
• Uh, sections one and two quickly.
• Uh section three $425 in one month.
• as<00:43:24.720> amended Section six as amendment as amended Section six as amendment
• section 15. Thank you, Chair Friends. section 15. Thank you, Chair Friends.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all