Transcript Highlights:

• Any other discussion on this bill? Seeing none, all those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye.
• Is there any discussion on final passage? Seeing none, all those in favor say aye. Aye.
• Any further discussion on this amendment? Seeing none, all those in favor say aye. Aye.
• Any further discussion on this amendment? Seeing none, all those in favor say aye. Aye.
• Is there any discussion on final passage? Senator Wagner? Sorry, I'm assuming you'll.

Bills: SB5865, SB5880, SB5912, SB5855, SB6011, SB6009, SB5868, SB5974

Keywords: garnishment, debt, form standardization, financial protection, legal processes, toxicology testing, laboratories, accreditation, public health, standards, indigent defense, task force, criminal justice, legal aid, public defense, face coverings, law enforcement, public safety, civil liberties, court security

Transcript Highlights:

• Any other discussion on this bill? Seeing none, all those in favor say aye. Aye.
• Is there any discussion on final passage? Seeing none, all those in favor say aye. Aye.
• Any further discussion on this amendment? Seeing none, all those in favor say aye. Aye.
• Any further discussion on this amendment? Seeing none, all those in favor say aye. Aye.
• Is there any discussion on final passage? Senator Wagner? Sorry, I'm assuming you'll.

Summary: The committee first took up executive action on several bills. SB 5865 on garnishment forms was amended to require the Washington Pattern Forms Committee to finish the new forms by December 31, 2026, with an effective date of January 1, 2027; a competing amendment was withdrawn, and the bill received a due pass recommendation. SB 5880 on toxicology testing by certified laboratories was amended to clarify that local governments may accept private donations to help fund ISO-IEC 17025 testing, without requiring them to do so, and it also received a due pass recommendation. SB 5912 to reinstate the Indigent Defense Task Force was amended to remove legislators from the task force, add members, revise duties and reporting, and adjust staffing and reimbursement provisions; it too was advanced. SB 5855 on law enforcement face coverings drew extensive amendment debate. The committee rejected amendments that would have narrowed mask exceptions, added weather/environmental language, created a private right of action against federal officers, and established a claims account for officers, but adopted the proposed substitute and sent the bill forward on a due pass recommendation. The committee then heard public testimony on SB 6011, which would let Court of Appeals bailiffs conduct threat assessments and access certain criminal history information for Court of Appeals judges and staff, mirroring authority already given to Supreme Court bailiffs. The bill’s sponsor and the acting chief judge for Division I said the change would address increasing threats and allow bailiffs to investigate and refer matters efficiently; there was no opposition testimony. SB 6009, which would make permanent direct-review procedures for certain administrative and land-use decisions, was described as a successful COVID-era process that reduces unnecessary court steps and conserves resources. The sponsor and a Court of Appeals judge supported making the sunset provisions permanent, and testimony was generally favorable. Public hearing also continued on SB 5868, which would add one Superior Court judge each in Skagit and Yakima counties. Court officials, county leaders, and the Administrative Office of the Courts testified that both counties have growing caseloads, trial delays, and backlogs, and that the counties had budgeted their share of the cost. The committee then heard SB 5974, which would add eligibility requirements for sheriffs, police chiefs, and marshals, restrict the use of volunteers and specially commissioned officers, and clarify duties of sheriffs. Supporters argued the bill would improve professionalism, accountability, and public trust, especially in immigrant and survivor communities. Opponents, including several sheriffs, cities, and counties, argued it would undermine local control and voter authority, impose costly background checks, and raise constitutional concerns. Public testimony on SB 5974 closed when time expired, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• And so that's one element of what you discussed.
• The goal is to discuss new approaches and priorities to accelerate progress on these issues.
• So more discussion is needed.
• So there was a lot of discussion around international wildland-urban interface codes.
• Well, the discussion is always happening independently.

Summary: The Senate Business, Trade, and Economic Development Committee met for its first session under the committee’s new name and heard a work session on Washington’s economic development policy from the Department of Commerce. Commerce described its Office of Economic Development and Competitiveness, including small business finance, export assistance, business attraction, and sector development work, and emphasized the need for a statewide economic development strategic plan with regular review, stakeholder input, and attention to rural and regional needs. Members asked about foreign trade offices, federal funding uncertainty, tax competitiveness, workforce programs, and the role of the Keep Washington Working program. Commerce said the state’s trade and investment efforts are valuable but face funding challenges, and that Washington must compete on more than taxes, including its business ecosystem and workforce. The committee then heard public testimony on Senate Bill 5919, which would encourage fire districts and insurers to develop voluntary incentives for wildfire mitigation best practices related to agricultural activities. The sponsor described the bill as a way to reward farmers for practices such as defensible space, fire breaks, equipment storage, and avoiding high-risk work during red flag conditions. A fire chief testified in support, citing recent standing grain fires and the need for practical incentives in rural areas. The bill was described as having no appropriation and no requested fiscal note. Members also heard testimony on Washington in the Making 2040 from the Association of Washington Business and a business owner. Supporters said the 16-year economic vision plan was built from broad public engagement and focuses on workforce, business climate, infrastructure, housing, and community. They argued Washington needs more housing, a more competitive regulatory and tax environment, and reliable energy to support growth. Senators questioned how the plan would achieve its housing goals and what specific regulatory changes were needed; AWB said it would provide a regulatory study soon. The committee also received a wildfire mitigation work group update from the Office of Insurance Commissioner, which recommended stronger community mitigation, better data sharing, consumer transparency, and a possible grant program for home hardening, though it did not reach full consensus on a single property mitigation standard. Finally, the committee held a public hearing on Senate Bill 5871, which would prohibit assignment of benefits in property and casualty insurance and set new rules for motor vehicle glass repair claims, including ADAS-related disclosures and limits on steering and inducements. The sponsor and supporters, including the Office of Insurance Commissioner, Safelite, NAMIC, and the Northwest Insurance Council, said the bill would reduce auto glass fraud, improve transparency, and help stabilize premiums. Independent glass shop owners and the Independent Glass Association opposed the bill as written, arguing it would favor large vertically integrated companies, restrict small businesses, and fail to address insurer steering and conflicts of interest. Several witnesses requested technical amendments, and the committee took no final vote before adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• cancer cells, that we can tailor the chemotherapy more specifically to whatever that might be more sensitive
• That are out there right now, like Grail, that are fairly sensitive, but they can't tell you what type
• It's a pretty good discussion, considering we didn't have a lot of time to really look at it, but that

Bills: SB1786

Keywords: artificial intelligence, content verification, provenance data, transparency, digital content, 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And so I'm certainly sensitive to it.
• And so I'm certainly sensitive to it.
• And, you know, I do agree with Senator Smith that the 120 days, and I've had a discussion with the home

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Summary: The Committee on Environment and Natural Resources heard several bills and reported each favorably. SB 958 by Senator Bradley would require local straw and stirrer ordinances to allow certified renewable, compostable, and marine-biodegradable products, with supporters saying it creates standards and more environmentally friendly options; it passed after brief discussion about PFAS in paper straws and market availability. SB 1066 by Senator Broder proposed a phased restoration plan for the Ocklawaha/Rodman Dam area, including partial dam removal, recreation and economic development measures, and a local advisory council; the committee adopted an amendment adding a Naval Air Station Jacksonville representative to the council, heard extensive testimony both for and against the project, and then reported the bill favorably. The committee also considered SB 698 by Senator Martin, which would let builders proceed with home construction after applying for septic permits rather than waiting for the permit to be issued first. Testimony focused on permitting delays, the effect of changing DEP rules, and a 120-day “glide path” for new standards; an amendment making a technical terminology change was adopted, and the bill passed despite concerns from Senator Smith about the 120-day provision. SB 1230 by Senator Harrell would phase out PFAS-containing firefighting foam, ban non-emergency training use in 2026, restrict sale and distribution in 2027, and prohibit possession and use in 2028, with exemptions for certain federal, military, and emergency uses; an amendment clarified DEP references and penalty language, and the bill was reported favorably. Finally, SB 1288 by Senator Harrell would designate a water body in the Jupiter Narrows area as the Andrew Red Harris Shoal in honor of a local environmental advocate who died rescuing a friend. An amendment clarified the shoal identification, and the bill passed without opposition. Several members later recorded votes in the affirmative on selected bills, and the committee adjourned after all measures were reported favorably.

Transcript Highlights:

• And Senator Yarborough, we've had this discussion.
• By doing so, it ensures the safety and privacy of those who play a vital role in collecting sensitive
• postal mail is not always reliable or timely, and posting notices on a resident's door, especially a sensitive

Summary: The Senate opened with a prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, doctor and guest introductions, and then moved to the special order calendar. Early bills passed included measures on the Florida Trust Code (SB 806/HB 1173), school district reporting requirements and educator misconduct reporting (SB 1374), debt collection email communications (SB 232), service of process updates (SB 576/HB 157), public lodging and food service establishments (SB 606), lien waivers and releases (SB 658), Crime Stoppers public records exemptions (SB 710), health care licensure and foreign-country business interests (SB 768, amended), diabetes management in schools (SB 772/HB 597), platting procedures (SB 784), fentanyl testing in hospitals (SB 1346/HB 1195), third-party reservation platforms (SB 940), electronic landlord-tenant notices (SB 1164/HB 615), leaving the scene of a crash restitution (SB 1378/HB 479), background screening for athletic coaches (SB 1546), surrendered infants and infant safety devices (SB 1690/HB 791), and affordable housing/Live Local Act changes (SB 1730, amended). Several other bills were temporarily postponed, including measures on trespass, higher education, transportation services, the UCC, altered sexual depictions, firearms during emergencies, Brownfields, false reporting, health care billing, motor vehicles, utility services, and others. Most of the debate centered on a few controversial bills. Senators debated the fentanyl testing bill in support of faster detection and life-saving treatment, and the surrendered infants bill drew opposition over safety, anonymity, and liability concerns, though supporters argued baby boxes provide a monitored safe surrender option. The affordable housing bill received an amendment and broad support as a continuation of the Live Local Act, with changes to zoning, parking, height, and litigation procedures. The day’s most contentious measure was the agriculture/consumer services package (SB 700), where senators argued over the bill’s fluoride-related preemption; opponents criticized the policy and process, while the sponsor emphasized broader agriculture, consumer protection, and FFA-related provisions. That bill passed 27-9. Votes on the other major bills were largely bipartisan and often unanimous or near-unanimous, with several bills passing 35-37 yeas and few or no nays. The Senate also adopted a motion to immediately certify all bills passed that day to the House. The session concluded with announcements recognizing visitors, including Taiwan representatives, and remarks about a lantern-lighting observance tied to the 250th anniversary of Paul Revere’s ride, followed by adjournment until the next scheduled meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• Any discussion on the minutes?
• </c> Any discussion to the amendment? Any discussion to the amendment?
• </c> discussion. All in favor? discussion. All in favor?
• Any further member discussion?
• Any further discussion to the bill?

Bills: HF4075, HF3826, HF3825, HF3827, HF3459, HF3711, HF4200, HF3908, HF3712

Keywords: firearm restrictions, domestic violence, public safety, court orders, criminal convictions, identity theft, subpoena authority, fraud, statute of limitations, financial crime, victim notification, expungement, criminal justice, plea agreements, minor victims, identification protection, stalking, crime data, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, law enforcement grants

Transcript Highlights:

• Public comment will be heard after the presentation and discussion.
• And so we are discussing today Medical care and food assistance.
• But we are in discussions with counties, and we hope to work collaboratively.
• Chair, and very much appreciating the discussion. I just want to remind us.
• One point that I want to discuss that hasn't been discussed, and that is the shape of our economy, and

Summary: The Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee held an oversight hearing on the impacts of H.R. 1 on California’s safety net, focusing on Medi-Cal and CalFresh. The chair and vice chair framed the issue as a major federal disruption that would reduce benefits and shift costs to the state, counties, hospitals, and other local systems. The first panel included the Legislative Analyst’s Office, the Department of Finance, the UC Berkeley Labor Center, and the Food Research and Action Center, each describing projected enrollment losses, higher state and county costs, and implementation challenges. The LAO outlined H.R. 1’s main changes: new and expanded work requirements, more frequent eligibility redeterminations, restrictions on certain non-citizen eligibility, and financing changes affecting provider taxes and federal matching rates. The LAO estimated that 1 to 2 million people could be disenrolled from Medi-Cal and more than 600,000 could lose CalFresh, with additional costs from reduced federal support and possible state and county administrative burdens. The Department of Finance said the Governor’s budget includes about $1.4 billion General Fund in 2026-27 to respond to H.R. 1, with larger out-year reductions in federal funds and projected Medi-Cal caseload losses of up to 2 million by 2029-30. The UC Berkeley Labor Center projected up to 3 million Californians could lose full-scope Medi-Cal by 2028 when H.R. 1 is combined with state budget changes, while noting the state could choose policies that would reduce some of those losses. The Food Research and Action Center warned that CalFresh cuts and time limits would increase hunger, worsen health outcomes, and strain local economies and emergency systems. Members questioned the witnesses about procedural disenrollments, regional variation, the overall growth in Medi-Cal spending, the future of the MCO tax, the CalFresh error rate, and the downstream effects on hospitals and county indigent care. Several senators argued that the federal law was driven by tax cuts for high-income earners and would disproportionately harm low-income Californians, immigrants, and communities of color. Administration witnesses said some impacts are still being analyzed, that counties and departments are working on implementation, and that the Legislature may need to use statute, reporting, and oversight tools as federal guidance develops. No votes or formal actions were taken during this portion of the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:14:45.680><c> up</c><00:14:45.839><c> a</c> discussions with fraud, setting up a discussions
• </c><00:29:45.120><c> how</c> thank you for inviting me to discuss how thank you for inviting me to discuss
• So this is not a speculative idea; this is a time-sensitive idea.
• </c><01:01:17.680><c> One</c><01:01:17.920><c> of</c> this is um a time-sensitive idea.
• One of this is um a time-sensitive idea.

Bills: HF4862, HF4598

Keywords: apprenticeship, education, teacher training, grant program, labor and industry, workers' compensation, Minnesota workers' compensation, Workers' Compensation Advisory Council, reinsurance association, Workers' Compensation Reinsurance Association, WCRA, occupational disease, presumption, first responders, firefighter cancer, PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder, police officer, paramedic, emergency medical technician

Transcript Highlights:

• Pearson's content is culturally sensitive and bias-aware.
• Pearson's content is culturally sensitive and bias-aware.
• Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this proposal.
• And that will end the discussion at the hearing on Senate Bill 5861.
• Any discussion? Hearing none, all in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed nay.

Summary: The committee held public hearings on several education bills. SB 6078 would provide pre-licensing supports for prospective child care providers through DCYF, fire protection consultations, and a licensing resource guide; the sponsor, DCYF, and a community nonprofit all supported it, emphasizing that it would reduce fragmented permitting barriers and help expand child care access, while a senator raised the possibility of overlap with existing early learning facilities support. SB 6089 would create a public-private partnership account to support coordination across the P-20W system and fund a public-facing data dashboard; the sponsor and many advocates supported it as a way to align early learning through workforce systems and improve transparency, while some testifiers urged stronger public oversight, caution about private influence, and explicit inclusion of early learning. SB 5859 would expand competency-based assessments as graduation pathway options; supporters said it would better reflect how students learn and provide flexibility, while the State Board of Education and school principals urged caution and suggested waiting for the board’s broader Future Ready graduation review. SB 5861 would require more school board directors to be elected from director districts in larger districts; supporters said it would improve community representation, while some districts and WSSDA warned about local control, added costs, and governance disruption. SB 6065 would allow districts in binding conditions or under enhanced financial oversight to use transportation vehicle funds for temporary loans or transfers with OSPI approval; supporters said it could help districts recover financially without harming transportation needs. After the hearings, the committee moved into executive session and acted on two bills. It adopted a proposed substitute to SB 5956, which restricts certain automated decision systems, surveillance technologies, biometric data, and facial recognition uses in student discipline and school safety decisions, and then advanced the bill with a do-pass recommendation to Rules. It also adopted a proposed substitute to SB 5901, which concerns state funding for on-base school construction, and advanced that bill with a do-pass recommendation to Ways and Means. Both measures were reported out subject to signatures.

Transcript Highlights:

• 00:16:20.399><c> of</c> discussions with the Department of discussions with the Department of Commerce
• I think it's worth a discussion.
• Since I think it's worth a discussion.
• . discussion. discussion.
• Um, there are some very sensitive public Um, there are some very sensitive public data<00:31:37.120><

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• HIPPA has a special protection<01:11:44.320><c> for</c><01:11:44.640><c> very</c><01:11:45.040><c> sensitive
• </c> protection for very sensitive protection for very sensitive information,<01:11:46.640><c> people
• extra layer of protection for that add a extra layer of protection for certain<01:11:59.199><c> sensitive
• <c> and</c><01:12:00.159><c> what</c><01:12:00.400><c> some</c><01:12:00.719><c> may</c> certain sensitive
• and what some may certain sensitive and what some may think<01:12:01.280><c> may</c><01:12:01.520><c

Keywords: MS House Floor - 21 January, 2026; 2:00 PM, 925, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I know there were a number of questions last time during the discussion.
• But sometimes things are time-sensitive.
• But sometimes things are time sensitive. Sometimes people really want to speak.
• I'm very interested in their discussion points. All right, board's clear.
• So I've heard and listened to the discussion by Representative Wright.

Summary: The committee first heard HB 1071, which creates a public records exception for certain aerospace facility and activity records, including blueprints, plans, technical data, operational documents, and security information tied to federally regulated work and contracts with the U.S. Department of War or intelligence agencies. The sponsor and several members emphasized protecting Louisiana aerospace and defense-related work, and the bill was reported favorably without objection. The committee then took up HB 181, as amended, which authorizes the legislative auditor to review confidential income tax records to help LDH verify Medicaid eligibility, and, after amendment, SNAP eligibility as well. Supporters said the bill would help identify ineligible recipients, reduce fraud, and improve the state’s error rate to avoid federal penalties; opponents argued tax returns are outdated and unreliable for current eligibility, could create false flags, and might burden or discourage eligible low-income residents. After extensive debate, the committee adopted Amendment Set 2633 and reported HB 181 favorably by a 10-6 vote. Later, the committee considered HB 250, which removes the requirement that immediate family members of appointed board or commission members disclose certain employment information, while leaving existing ethics prohibitions in place. The Ethics Board said the bill would not change substantive conflict-of-interest rules, only the disclosure requirement, and the bill was reported favorably as amended. HB 544, authorizing a citizen’s advisory referendum election, was briefly explained as a nonbinding, petition-driven local ballot question process, but the sponsor deferred it for further consideration and the committee deferred the bill. The committee also heard HB 1036, which clarifies when a group is considered a “committee” for campaign finance purposes by using a more objective spending threshold rather than the current “primary purpose” standard. Ethics officials said the change would give clearer investigative guidance without changing other disclosure rules, and the bill was reported favorably. Finally, HB 210 was amended to address retroactivity concerns in a prior ethics-related provision affecting school board and local governing authority members employed by entities with contracts or business before June 5, 2024; the amendment grandfathered earlier situations while requiring disclosures going forward, and the bill was reported favorably as amended.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> chosen because they are time-sensitive chosen because they are time-sensitive and<01:01:55.359><
• <01:40:40.239><c> issue</c> sensitive issue sensitive issue &gt;&gt; yes<01:40:41.040><c> but</c><01:
• The discussions are okay.
• </c><02:55:38.319><c> this</c> looking and we're going to discuss this looking and we're going to discuss
• </c> in those areas are very sensitive in those areas are very sensitive databases<03:03:34.640><c> as

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I would discuss all the patients, the most high-risk patients.
• But I'm happy to open this up to discussion by the committee.
• Further discussion. Judge Dolan. Thank you.
• been discussed today, I think that is appropriate.
• Further discussion. Senator Washington. Thank you. Representative Clements.

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair, I'm sensitive to the concern you're raising.
• So it's up for discussion. So we just did the amendment.
• Well, I can have a motion to move the amendment for discussion purposes.
• Well, I can have a motion to move the amendment for discussion purposes.
• Chair, committee, can I have some discussion on the bill?

Bills: SB151, HB8, SB177

Keywords: corporate income tax, franchise tax, gross receipts tax, tax credit, tax deduction, controlled foreign corporation, CFC, bonus depreciation, interest expense, apportionment, unitary group, high-wage jobs tax credit, local journalism, news media, newspaper printer, physician incentive, health care workforce, affordable housing, multifamily housing, construction materials

Transcript Highlights:

• But as you've heard us talk about before, we are very sensitive to changes and expansions in declaring
• And so we welcome the opportunity to set this bill aside, have some intense discussions about how we
• I also want to thank the Chair for having this discussion.
• This has been a long, long discussion and may still be open to discussions.
• We're encouraged that this could lead to further discussions here and another venues with the department

Bills: SB5379, SB6106, SB6147, SB6180, SB5927, SB6287

Keywords: interest arbitration, parks and recreation, public employees, labor relations, employee rights, laid-off employees act, WARN notice, mass layoff, business closure, plant closing, worker adjustment and retraining notification, employment security department, employee notice, layoff notice, worker protections, job loss, employment loss, public records exemption, privacy, employee names and addresses

Transcript Highlights:

• Including sensitive habitats, but tribal consultation.
• And I think part of the discussion in the past was around those exports.
• I know there's a broad discussion happening on the reauthorization.
• I know there's a broad discussion happening on the reauthorization.
• I know there's a broad discussion happening on the reauthorization.

Summary: The joint informational hearing of the Assembly Committees on Utilities and Energy, Transportation, and Natural Resources focused on California’s transportation fuels sector, especially the state’s response to refinery closures and the broader transition away from fossil fuels. Opening remarks emphasized the tension between climate and air-quality goals, fuel affordability, refinery jobs and local tax bases, and the need to avoid crisis-driven responses as Phillips 66 and Valero consider shutting refineries in Wilmington and Benicia. Professor Emily Grubert framed the issue as a long-term managed transition in which the public already bears much of the risk and should also capture benefits from a well-planned shift. CARB Chair Leanne Randolph reviewed the state’s emissions and fuel policies, including AB 32, the low-carbon fuel standard, clean vehicle programs, and the at-berth regulation for ocean-going vessels. She said California’s transportation sector remains the largest source of greenhouse gases and a major source of smog-forming pollution, but that the state has made substantial progress and still needs to reduce demand for fossil fuels while maintaining compliance with federal air-quality standards. Randolph also said CARB’s recent LCFS amendments had not caused the predicted spike in gas prices and explained that compliance pathways for the at-berth rule include emissions-reduction technologies or payments into a remediation fund. CEC Vice Chair Gunda described declining gasoline demand, shrinking in-state refining capacity, and growing dependence on imports, arguing that the state is in a “mid-transition” period that requires both support for legacy infrastructure and continued investment in cleaner alternatives. He outlined the administration’s petroleum market stabilization proposal, which aims to return California crude production to 125 million barrels a year through four components: codifying the ban on fracking, validating the Kern County oil-and-gas permitting ordinance, creating a temporary CEQA exemption paired with a two-for-one plug-and-drill framework, and strengthening pipeline and spill-safety requirements. Department of Conservation Director Jennifer Lucasey said the proposal is intended to stabilize crude supply and pipeline throughput while preserving health and environmental protections, and noted that CalGEM would still review permits and enforce other requirements. Mayor Steve Young of Benicia testified that a Valero closure would significantly reduce city revenue and leave the community facing years of cleanup and redevelopment challenges. He said the city supports environmental protection but is worried about the economic hit, the possibility that Benicia becomes a fuel-import terminal, and the lack of local influence over refinery decisions. Members pressed the panel on the CEQA exemption, tribal and habitat review, disclosure of closure liabilities, fuel-demand projections, and whether the proposal should include more demand-side measures. No formal votes were taken; the hearing was informational, and officials said some proposals, including a margin-cap pause and further transition planning, would be taken up later in the process.

Transcript Highlights:

• Seeing none, we'll move to member discussion. Is there any discussion to the bill? Chair Nash.
• 33:58.040><c> in</c><00:33:58.200><c> ways</c> discussion on spending happens in ways discussion on spending
• </c><00:43:20.320><c> these</c> this commission to discuss these this commission to discuss these important
• </c> discussion. Representative Anderson. discussion. Representative Anderson.
• Closing member discussion. All right. Closing member discussion.

Bills: HF3455, HF3936, HF3860, HF3656, HF4060

Keywords: public television, funding, Minnesota, operations, appropriation, cybersecurity, state government, legislative commission, extension, technology, civil law enforcement, attorney general, record custody, government transparency, legal services, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• We cannot discuss the future of space without acknowledging the The state's infrastructure is positioned
• We cannot discuss the future of space without acknowledging the The state's infrastructure is positioned
• We cannot discuss the future of space without acknowledging the The state's infrastructure is positioned
• We cannot discuss the future of space without acknowledging the The state's infrastructure is positioned
• We cannot discuss the future of space without acknowledging the Impact of private industry.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Monday, February 24, 2025, 1012, house, all