Video & Transcript Research : 'payment'
Page 68 of 350
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:09:12.160>
Um cash payments like the MFIP program. - Um cash payments like the MFIP program.
- There were the economic impact payments There were the economic impact payments that<00:40:32.360
- >
also <00:40:42.320>were Um unemployment uh payments also were Um unemployment uh payments - 42:47.600>
which those economic impact payments which those economic impact payments which were
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 2/18/26
Commerce Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- As an aside, this is my bit of payments.
- and not allowing pro rata payments.
- and making and not allowing pro payments and making and not allowing pro prata<01:30:45.199>
payments - Um as you can see from prata payments.
- a a lesser payment than something full. a a lesser payment than something full. >> Okay.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Senate Health and Human Services (01/15/2025)
Health and Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- from the drug company will co-payments from the drug company will apply<00:50:44.119>
towards - for something because that higher payment may not... so we think in the big picture higher pressure
- on... autop pocket limits these payments by autop pocket limits these payments by manufacturers<01:40
- and when it comes to deciding payments and when it comes to deciding whether<01:41:26.280>
or - something because that higher payment something because that higher payment may<01:41:29.119>
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 4/9/25
Human Services Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- that uh transitions to direct payments that uh transitions to direct payments to<00:08:41.200>
- On line 558, facility payment rates.
- It subjects DWRS payments to MA sanctions and monetary recovery requirements.
- These are the behavioral health fund payment reforms.
- <01:00:57.440>
as combination of the facility payments as combination of the facility payments
Bills:
HF2434
DE
Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Appropriations Committee Meeting Jun 23rd, 2026
Appropriations
Transcript Highlights:
- The fiscal note associated with this bill reflects a reduction in co-payments for families receiving
- This bill creates a separate co-payment for half-day care, aligning family co-payments with the state's
- This bill creates a separate co-payment for half-day care, aligning family co-payments with the state
- We expect that the hospital payment reforms in this bill will save the state employee group health insurance
Keywords:
military pension, military retirement pay, veterans, retiree tax relief, income tax exemption, pension exclusion, Delaware income tax, retirement income, state tax subtraction, armed forces retirement, National Guard, Space Force, Coast Guard, NOAA, Public Health Service, taxable income, Title 30, Section 1106, wetlands protection, nontidal wetlands
Summary:
The House Appropriations Committee met to hear several bills, with members repeatedly reminded to focus on fiscal impacts rather than policy merits. The committee first considered SB 9 on freshwater wetlands, which would combine tidal and non-tidal wetlands programs into one permitting framework; supporters said the bill resulted from a two-year consensus process and that the governor’s office and DENREC would absorb a significant share of the cost. Public testimony was largely supportive, emphasizing flood control and ecosystem services, though one speaker opposed the spending. The committee voted to release SB 9.
The committee then heard SB 278 on child care assistance, which would preauthorize summer camp for eligible school-age children and create a separate lower co-payment for half-day care. The sponsor and the YMCA of Delaware said the change would better align family co-pays with provider reimbursement and make before- and after-school care more affordable for working families. The committee also released SB 278, SB 168 on alcohol delivery for package stores, SB 120 on health insurance coverage for certain testing and treatment, and HB 4, a pilot program for artificial intelligence and extended reality in schools; HB 4 was described as having a near-$3 million fiscal note and a one-year implementation delay because it was not funded in the budget.
Later, the committee approved SB 219, which gradually increases the military pension income tax exclusion from $12,500 to $25,000 over three years and includes related joint-filing and residency changes. Supporters argued it would help attract and retain military retirees and bring federal dollars into the state. The committee also released SB 1, a major primary care reform bill that would increase primary care spending and implement hospital payment reforms, with projected long-term savings to the state employee health plan, and SB 325, which expands background checks and wrap-back monitoring for fire service personnel and adds an investigator position for the Fire Prevention Commission. In each case, public commenters and committee members generally supported the bills, and all were released from committee by recorded vote.
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services (01/20/2026)
Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:45:50.640>
So information relative to payments. So information relative to payments. - If it's paid, send us proof of payment and get the payments off to the...
- us proof of payment and get the payments us proof of payment and get the payments off<01:06:32.720
- <04:02:57.680>
of damages may be due for non-payment of damages may be due for non-payment - to fight to get the proper uh payment to fight to get the proper uh payment for<04:44:02.400>
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Senate Standing Committee on State and Local Government. (2-11-26)
State & Local Government
Transcript Highlights:
- The length of this annual incentive payment shall not exceed seven years for new construction and 15
- 39.040>
incentive developer an annual housing incentive developer an annual housing incentive payment - 00:13:41.360>
be <00:13:41.519>based <00:13:41.920>on <00:13:42.160>a payment - , which would be based on a payment, which would be based on a percentage<00:13:43.120>
of <00: - :53.519>
incentive The length of this annual incentive The length of this annual incentive payment
Keywords:
Meeting Start: 00:04
Attendance Roll Call: 00:08
SB 141 Discussion 00:58
SB 141 Vote 07:03
SB 9 Discussion 09:10
SB 9 Vote 19:47
Adjournment: 21:20, 958, all
Summary:
The Senate State and Local Government Committee first took up Senate Bill 141, sponsored by Senator Given, which revises Kentucky’s public notice laws. Senator Given said the bill was the product of negotiations among the Kentucky Press Association, the Kentucky League of Cities, and the Kentucky Association of Counties, aiming to balance transparency with the cost of publication. Testimony described changes to clarify which newspapers may publish legal notices, address publication errors, ensure fair and reasonable rates, update ad size requirements, and provide more practical hearing timelines. Committee members praised the compromise and the bill’s modernization, including expanded online access to public notices. SB 141 passed 10-0 with favorable expression.
The committee then considered Senate Bill 9, sponsored by Senator Mills, and first adopted a substitute that addressed concerns from Farm Bureau and the Kentucky Bankers Association. Senator Mills said Kentucky faces a significant housing shortage and that the bill would give local governments two tools to encourage development without direct state cost: a residential infrastructure development district and a housing development district. He explained that the first tool would help finance infrastructure within a district through bonds repaid by special assessments, while the second would allow local governments to negotiate incentives and streamlined review for larger housing projects. Members asked about public participation, local control, infrastructure financing, and whether the bill required affordable housing set-asides; Mills said the bill leaves those decisions to local governments. SB 9 passed 9-0 with one pass and favorable expression.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Environment Committee Meeting - 2025-04-03
Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- How these treaty payments are calculated.
- We take that amount, subtract it from 1.5 million to calculate the 1854 treaty payments.
- So in actuality, the bands have been receiving a payment.
- Basically, the payment hasn't been adjusted, but the agreement also talks about an arbitration clause
- So we could discuss a payment, but we would still have to come back to the legislature to have those
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
- Grass was referring to: those are the payments on the bonds. The $35 million that Mr.
- Grass was referring to, those are the payments on the bonds. Correct.
- And then the payments—principal and interest. Correct.
- But that $35 million of payments includes interest that we are now paying to the bondholders.
- Higher payments a year? Well, obviously, the 10-year bond, yeah.
Keywords:
stormwater, recharge mapping, water resources, groundwater, appropriation, Arizona, HB2116, Colorado River, litigation fund, water rights, Arizona water law, general fund appropriation, state budget, interstate water compact, Colorado River Compact, water litigation, A.R.S. 45-119, natural resources, water policy, river management
Summary:
The committee first considered House Bill 2116, which would appropriate $1 million in fiscal year 2027 from the State General Fund to the Colorado River Litigation Fund. The sponsor said it was a repeat of last year’s request and was intended as a backup if the seven Colorado River basin states cannot reach a new agreement. Arizona Department of Water Resources staff testified in support, explaining the state’s role in ongoing Colorado River negotiations and distinguishing the litigation fund from the executive’s separate Colorado River Protection Fund. The bill received a due pass recommendation on a 17-1 vote.
The committee then took up House Bill 2053, which appropriates $100,000 to ADWR for updated stormwater recharge mapping and expands the mapping effort beyond state trust lands to private lands. The committee adopted Chairman Livingston’s amendment, which extended the coordination timeline to one year, broadened the agencies involved, and revised language on site eligibility and the definition of stormwater. The sponsor said the bill would help identify more places to capture stormwater for recharge, while ADWR testified neutral, supporting the mapping work but raising a concern about language tied to appropriable surface water because that is a legal determination for the courts. The amended bill passed 11-7.
House Bill 2148 was then heard, proposing to give the legislature authority to appropriate non-custodial federal monies, with requirements for specifying purposes and allowing agencies to spend such funds if the legislature does not act. An amendment excluded university and Board of Regents research grants from the bill’s scope, which the chair said was intended to avoid implementation problems. The sponsor framed the bill as a transparency measure, and members discussed the large amount of federal pass-through funding Arizona receives. The amended bill passed 11-7.
After the bills, the committee received a lengthy JLBC presentation comparing the executive budget with the JLBC baseline. Discussion focused on revenue forecasts, the impact of federal tax conformity, state employee health insurance costs, SNAP administrative and error-rate costs under H.R. 1, developmental disabilities and AHCCCS growth, and K-12/ESA funding trends. Members repeatedly criticized the executive budget for funding some ongoing costs on a one-year basis and expressed concern about rising caseloads and supplemental needs. No formal action was taken on the presentation.
NM
New Mexico 2026 Regular Session
IC - Revenue Stabilization and Tax Policy Dec 15th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- So there's also the issue, it's not only costs, but it's payments.
- Its payments.
- Lump-sum payments, especially from the patient compensation fund, are harmful for patients in the long
- And again, that's on medical supplies, co-insurance, co-pays, deductibles, any kind of cash payments.
- Lump sum payment.
Summary:
The committee first approved the minutes from its fourth meeting, held October 27-28 in Santa Fe, with Representative Duncan moving approval and no opposition. The chair then introduced a panel on the cost of providing medical care in New Mexico, focusing on physician shortages, rising practice costs, and access problems, especially in southern New Mexico and Las Cruces. Panelists included family physicians, a pediatrician, a cardiologist/electrophysiologist, and a community health center medical director, who described their backgrounds and practices before turning to the policy discussion.
The doctors argued that New Mexico is losing physicians because of three main pressures: medical malpractice exposure, gross receipts tax on medical services, and low Medicaid reimbursement. They said malpractice premiums are much higher than in neighboring states, punitive damages and venue shopping increase risk, and the patient compensation fund and attorney fee structure create additional costs. They also described administrative burdens from insurance billing and referrals, the high debt and long training period for physicians, and the effect of corporate medicine and private equity on practice decisions. One panelist emphasized the economic impact of each physician on jobs and local spending, while another noted that shortages force patients into emergency rooms and delay specialty care.
The panel presented a list of proposed solutions: reform punitive damages, limit venue shopping and stacking, restore lifetime medical payments from the patient compensation fund, enact apology protections, cap attorney fees, continue Medicaid funding improvements, and eliminate gross receipts tax on medical and dental services. Committee members generally agreed the presentation was thorough and useful, but several noted that some proposals fall outside this committee’s jurisdiction and would likely need to move through other committees, especially judiciary and tax. Some members supported drafting legislation or working on separate bills, while others urged caution, requested more input from hospitals and economists, and raised concerns about local government revenue impacts from GRT changes. The chair concluded by encouraging members to continue discussions offline and noted that the tax-related issue would be taken up further in the next day’s work.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband and Rural Development - 04/13/26
Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:26:59.160>
to in annual land lease payments to in annual land lease payments to Minnesota - lease payments. lease payments.
- On lines 18 and 19, this is extension of unencumbered funds for the down payment as farm down payment
- unencumbered funds for the down payment unencumbered funds for the down payment as<01:10:55.920>
- >
assistance as farm farm down payment assistance as farm farm down payment assistance program
VT
Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Caucus of the Whole - 2026-05-29 - 11:15AM
Vermont House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- The Senate came up with a construct to increase payments to primary care providers who used to get payments
- Who used to get payments from the accountable care organization that went away, and we were able to find
- the CLA. ...in terms of what is voted locally because you are receiving the education opportunity payment
- Section 17 was extending tax credits for a down payment assistance program with...
- Section 17 included a down payment assistance program with the Vermont Housing Finance Agency.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- A fine of $500 for each violation and a money judgment for payment of attorney's fees and court costs
- Do you review the plaintiff's payment of child support as part of your review of their request for access
- Not that I want the custodial parent to leverage... ...lack of payment against the non-custodial parent
- If a provider fails to comply, it means the provider forfeits the right for payment for the service.
- Since the attorney isn't responsible for payment of the bill, even though they are the patient's legal
Keywords:
low-THC cannabis, dispensing organization, Texas Compassionate-Use Program, medical use, patient access, registration, healthcare, legislation, credit card fraud, debit card fraud, prosecution, illegal possession, state law, political contributions, address privacy, Texas Ethics Commission, election transparency, campaign finance, election supplies, ballots
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Community Affairs Jan 14th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- 5% OF THE FIRST MORTGAGE LOAN AMOUNT WITH A MINIMUM OF $10,000 AND A MAXIMUM OF 35,000 IN A DOWN PAYMENT
- THE LOAN IS FOR 30 YEARS BUT IS 0% INTEREST AND THERE'S NO PAYMENTS.
- Leek: HOW MUCH OF THE DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE WE RETRIEVE OR HAVE COLLECTED BACK FROM FOLKS WHO NO LONGER
- OR OTHER UNEXPECTED THINGS LIKE THAT THAT CAN LEAD TO THOSE FAMILIES STRUGGLING WITH THE MORTGAGE PAYMENT
- WE ALSO HAVE THE HOMEOWNER LOAN PROGRAMS AND HOMETOWN HEROES THAT PROVIDE DOWN PAYMENT AND CLOSING COST
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- With payment amounts based upon the ...
- have required full restitution payment have required full restitution payment before<01:37:35.200
- If the subject's payment is withheld, the proposal also extends the agency's ability to withhold payment
- In this agency can withhold payment.
- payment is withheld. payment is withheld.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Science, Technology and Energy (01/27/2025)
Science, Technology and Energy
Transcript Highlights:
- <01:42:20.440>
as goes to alternate compliance payments as goes to alternate compliance payments - <01:42:27.560>
because Alternate compliance payments because Alternate compliance payments - <01:42:47.840>
varies Alternative compliance payments varies Alternative compliance payments - <01:43:42.639>
for the alternate compliance payments for the alternate compliance payments - that the alternate compliance payments that the alternate compliance payments is<01:44:49.040>
ND
North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session
Tribal and State Relations Committee May 13th, 2026
Tribal and State Relations Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- Now, in general, for federal lands, the United States is doing payments in lieu of taxes.
- We have some folks from Indian Country who are asking for payment in lieu of taxes for the tribes in
- Other services the individual might need do not have a payment source.
- We've increased payments for residential services by over 1,700% and payments for outpatient services
- We've increased payments for residential services by over 1,700% and payments for outpatient services
Summary:
The committee met at Spirit Lake Tribe and heard an extended discussion with Spirit Lake tribal leaders and program directors about government-to-government relations with the state. Chairwoman Street and others outlined a number of concerns and requests, including taxation of tribal and trust lands, state school support for non-beneficiary students, homelessness services, Indian-managed health care, gaming/e-tabs, the Feather Alert system, industrial farming near waterways, tourism and cultural issues, and the need for more consistent tribal consultation. Committee members responded that many of these issues had previously been passed along without direct action, and several members emphasized the committee’s role in education, communication, and preparing possible legislation or resolutions for the next session. Tribal representatives also offered to provide training on treaties, IHS 638, and compact services to help legislators better understand tribal jurisdiction and billing issues.
A major portion of the meeting focused on Spirit Lake Fish and Wildlife concerns, especially jurisdictional “gray areas” around hunting and fishing on the reservation, recognition of tribal licenses, and the boundary of the reservation around Spirit Lake/Devils Lake. Tribal officials said they wanted a co-stewardship agreement or MOU with the state to clarify jurisdiction, improve cooperation, and address invasive species and aquatic nuisance species. Committee members discussed whether to draft legislation or a resolution directing the executive branch and state agencies to negotiate such an agreement, and they asked for further input from the North Dakota Game and Fish Department at a future meeting. The committee also discussed county involvement in land status changes and trust land issues, with Spirit Lake leaders describing a past Benson County resolution that tried to block fee-to-trust transfers and saying it was later rescinded.
The committee then heard from Benson County tax equalization director Randy Thompson, who explained how the county values land and handles tax-exempt, inundated, and fee-to-trust parcels. Members asked about the impact of tax-exempt lands on county services and discussed prior legislation that helped counties with large tax-exempt bases. The committee also received a presentation from Dr. Steven Smith of Sisseton Wahpeton College, who described the college’s programs, economic impact, and funding needs, including support for non-beneficiary students and workforce training. Members asked about expanding tribal college education into correctional settings, and Smith said the idea was worth exploring through the tribal college system. Finally, HHS interim medical services director Christoph Framing presented remotely on 1115 Medicaid waivers and the IMD exclusion, explaining current state funding mechanisms for inpatient and residential behavioral health services and the bill draft directing HHS to pursue a waiver for IMD payments.
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Interim Joint Committee on Natural Resources & Energy (7-2-26) - Reupload
Natural Resources & Energy
Transcript Highlights:
- We make the payments this program.
- No cash payment goes to a provider. No cash payment goes to a household. household. household.
- That is bill payment component.
- Again, no payments made to folks. Again, no payments made to households.
- higher than the 150 on the bill payment. higher than the 150 on the bill payment.
Bills:
SB8
Keywords:
utilities, public service commission, energy regulation, appointment, emergency declaration, tax increases, consumer protection, The first couple minutes of the livestream was cut off. This recording restored the beginning of the meeting
Meeting Start 00:00:00
Attendance Roll Call 00:00:51
Approval of Minutes 00:02:07
Legislator Comments 00:02:18
LIHEAP Public Hearing 00:04:19
PSC Update on RS 26 SB 8 00:32:18
WaterStep Presentation 01:04:08, 958, all
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
Carbon Sequestration Programs Study Commission (03/06/2026)
Transcript Highlights:
- guaranteed annual payment per year. guaranteed annual payment per year.
- So, 20% of the payment is up front.
- Um, and so they they have those guaranteed<00:47:36.840>
payments. - Um, and as we guaranteed payments.
- that they receive the financial payments that they receive the financial payments for<01:00:56.520
Summary:
The meeting began with introductions and approval of the previous minutes, including a small amendment clarifying a note about “leakage” in a prior presentation. The committee then heard a presentation from Sarah Hall of the American Forest Foundation on the Family Forest Carbon Program, which she described as a voluntary carbon and forest management program for smaller landowners. She said the program provides annual payments and technical assistance, requires a forest management plan within two years, and is designed to support improved forest management while still allowing compatible uses such as recreation, hunting, and some harvesting.
Hall emphasized that the program is intended as one tool among many and is not a fit for every property. She said most enrolled landowners did not previously have a forest management plan or work with a forester, and that the program helps bring “unengaged” landowners into active management. She also said the program is compatible with current use and other commitments on a case-by-case basis, and that landowners retain ownership of their land and timber rights while AFF holds the carbon rights for the contract term. She highlighted examples of landowners using the program to support taxes, family ownership, wildlife habitat, timber stand improvement, and continued recreational or business uses.
Committee members asked about registry compliance in New Hampshire and the relationship between carbon markets and the program. Hall responded that AFF handles registry administration for landowners and would follow up on the specific registry count raised by a member. She explained that the program is funded through a mix of carbon market revenue, philanthropy, and grants, and that carbon credits are generated through landscape-level methodology and monitored using randomly selected plots compared with FIA data. She also noted that consulting foresters are key partners in the program and that AFF has paid more than $3 million to consultants nationwide.
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Budget Review Subcommittee on Health and Family Service (11-5-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- , the cost of transporting is what it is, no matter what the payment structure is.
- the cost of transporting is what it is, no matter what the payment structure is.
- higher payout, the capitated payment higher payout, the capitated payment system,<00:22:52.880><
- So So what the the payment structure is.
- <00:34:51.119>
or were uh lacking in finan in payments or were uh lacking in finan in payments
Summary:
The Budget Review Subcommittee on Health and Family Services met in person, approved the October 15 minutes, and began with a moment of silence following a Louisville UPS plane explosion that was described as a local tragedy affecting many families and first responders. The main presentation was an overview of Kentucky’s Medicaid non-emergency medical transportation (NMT) program from the Department for Medicaid Services and the Transportation Cabinet. Witnesses explained that NMT is a federally required Medicaid benefit, administered by the Transportation Cabinet under a risk-based capitated model, with eligibility limited to Medicaid members traveling to medically necessary, Medicaid-covered services and who lack access to other transportation. They also described exclusions, including certain KCHIP, QMB, and PACE members, and outlined the brokered regional structure, call center operations, scheduling rules, vehicle and driver oversight, complaint handling, and rider surveys.
The presenters reported that NMT handled more than 3.1 million trips in state fiscal year 2024, with over 1.38 million trips already recorded in October, and said customer satisfaction surveys were high. They said the FY 2025-26 contract total is about $360.6 million, with monthly per-member capitation rates set by region through an actuarial process and approved by CMS. They emphasized that payments are tied to monthly Medicaid enrollment and that the state draws down federal funds for the exact amount paid, with no leftover balance. They also said most NMT use comes from adult day centers and rehabilitative care such as dialysis.
Members questioned the witnesses about how quality metrics and contract standards are set, whether the state had explored alternatives such as Uber Health or other integrated models, and how utilization was calculated. The witnesses said contract requirements are developed collaboratively by Medicaid Services, the Transportation Cabinet, and other agencies, and that studies of other models generally found higher costs and lower approval ratings, with additional research on a hybrid model expected by the end of the year. They clarified that one figure reflected the share of Medicaid members with registered vehicles, while another reflected actual NMT users, and they defended the capitated structure as shifting financial risk to brokers rather than the state. Representative Fleming also raised concerns about oversight, reporting, and the apparent gap between budgeted and contracted amounts, asking whether any unused funds would return to general funds; the discussion ended before a final answer was given.