Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygneBT7ESQQ, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8eaGh7_UzQ, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhUys1656ZY, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTYcmiy54zc, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpXtB6M2558, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhLGQX6bqW8, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTrVov23IsM, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qjkpp1mwoFY, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQP3YsGR1qY, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzqH8I_KSPo, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMPtSoycGHw, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzfmhQUVEoU, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fINi0iL0esM, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKET_YTh3C0, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tz11ngoEhn0, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSCyABaoykI, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiJD1TuRZ6c, 2026-06-21T07:16:58+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Transcript Highlights:

• But do you have any data currently on, like, Do you have any data currently on, like, the total percentage
• But I’m just wondering if you gather that data or if someone does.
• We're going to check data sources.
• We are working with the state longitudinal data system to see what data we can use through the data system
• The data sources we check will consider them verified.

Summary: The subcommittee received a brief DHS update on the Living Choices Assisted Living Waiver reimbursement rate process, with Secretary Janet Mann reporting that the new cost reporting period began in January and that DHS has begun provider and contractor conference calls as the process moves forward. The bulk of the meeting focused on DHS’s overview of TANF and, especially, SNAP changes under the federal One Big Beautiful Bill. Mary Franklin explained new SNAP work requirements for adults ages 18 to 64 who are not otherwise exempt, including the three-month time limit in a 36-month period unless they meet an 80-hour monthly work, volunteer, education, or training requirement. She also reviewed exemptions, noted that some prior exemptions were removed while new tribal-related exemptions were added, and described SNAP Employment and Training providers, budgets, service areas, participant characteristics, and outcomes. Members asked about how mandatory referrals will work, whether funding and vendors are sufficient, how cross-program participation is tracked, how verification and recertification will be handled, and how error rates and sanctions will be managed. DHS said mandatory participants will be referred directly to providers, verification will occur at application and recertification, interviews can be by phone, and the department will return with more information on error-rate mitigation and other requested data. DHS then outlined upcoming Medicaid community engagement requirements for the ARHOME population under the same federal law, which must be implemented by January 1, 2027. The department said it is preparing policy, system changes, data matching, communications, and an outbound customer-service verification process, with a soft launch planned for July to help identify who would meet the requirement or need to provide more information. Members raised concerns about notice, local versus centralized decision-making, and how clients will document work, school, caregiving, or medical exemptions. The meeting concluded with broader discussion of the Alliance for Opportunity audit and a shared emphasis on using SNAP, Medicaid, TANF, and workforce programs together to improve outcomes, expand training options, and better connect Arkansans to education and employment opportunities. The committee also discussed extending the audit contract at a future meeting and adjourned without taking any formal vote in the transcript provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• So retention matters.
• We need data.
• So we have a plan to update our data infrastructure so that we can get access to data in a more timely
• I'd like to see how that data and which data you use to determine some of those determinations.
• But more than plenty of data here that shows substantial...

Summary: The joint Assembly Higher Education and Budget Subcommittee hearing focused on the future of the California State University system, with opening remarks emphasizing CSU’s major role in California’s economy, workforce, and degree production. Chairs and members said the hearing was intended to inform 2026 budget decisions and to examine three main issues: declining enrollment at some campuses, cost controls and possible consolidation, and oversight of recent state investments at campuses such as Humboldt and Sonoma. The meeting was briefly delayed by microphone and sound problems before reconvening. The first panel featured CSU Academic Senate Chair Dr. Elizabeth Boyd and Cal State Student Association Vice President Katie Karam. Boyd urged the Legislature to protect academic freedom, strengthen faculty governance, provide stable ongoing funding, end unfunded mandates, support student food and housing security, fund flexible course schedules, improve transfer systems such as ASSIST, avoid over-centralizing academic programs, protect immigrant students, and expand intersegmental collaboration. Karam said students are feeling the effects of budget shortfalls through fewer course sections, reduced advising and services, longer time to degree, and tuition pressure, and she called for transparency, meaningful student involvement in budget decisions, and sustained state investment rather than cuts that harm the student experience. The second panel covered enrollment management and included CSU Chancellor’s Office and campus administrators from Chico State, Cal State L.A., and San Diego State. Dr. Delcy Perez said CSU Forward and the new systemwide enrollment plan are aimed at expanding access, aligning programs with workforce needs, and increasing resident enrollment; she reported systemwide enrollment gains and strong application numbers, including a direct-admissions pilot that expanded from Riverside to more campuses. Campus representatives described local recruitment and retention strategies, including early outreach to high school students, community college partnerships, guaranteed admission programs, and expanded advising and student support. San Diego State highlighted record enrollment and high demand, while Cal State L.A. described efforts to recover from impaction and rebuild enrollment. Members pressed CSU officials on the accuracy of enrollment data, the gap between funded targets and actual enrollment, and the system’s reallocation formula. CSU staff explained that campuses below target will see a 5% ongoing reallocation beginning in 2026-27, with one-time reserve funding also being directed to campuses that can grow, and that fiscal health reviews have been completed for 21 of 22 campuses. Legislators also asked about turnaround plans required by the budget act; CSU said those plans are being developed and will be shared in the spring after campus consultation. No formal votes were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• they've implemented basic safeguards. 250 employees have been sued for exemplary damages following data
• SB 2610 provides a legal safe harbor from exemplary damages in data breach lawsuits for businesses that
• businesses, SMBs, on implementing reasonable cybersecurity controls, safeguarding sensitive personal data
• Several states have already enacted similar laws, such as Ohio's 2018 Data Protection Act and Utah's

Bills: SB1540, SB2610, SB2373

Keywords: election officials, confidentiality, personal information, government transparency, public safety, cybersecurity, data breach, breach of system security, exemplary damages, punitive damages, liability shield, safe harbor, small business, mid-sized business, Texas Business & Commerce Code, sensitive personal information, personal identifying information, identity theft, fraud prevention, NIST