Transcript Highlights:

• In addition to this, regulatory arbitrage, internal tool development, and a still immature emergent regulatory
• Trying to be efficient. So when we get a quorum, we'll take up your bill. And I have one more.
• We need a regulatory framework that reflects the progress of the small business community.
• We need regulatory framework that reflects the progress of the small business community.
• AB 2499 is a practical step toward a more efficient claims process.

Summary: The committee heard AB 1887, which would speed prior authorization for FDA-approved rare disease treatments prescribed by specialists and, if a plan does not act within 30 days, deem the request approved. The author and supporters, including patients and clinicians, said delays can cause irreversible harm, hospitalizations, and death, especially for children and people with progressive rare diseases. Health plans and insurers opposed the bill’s automatic-approval provision and said the measure lacked safeguards for incomplete requests and shared responsibility for timely information. The chair encouraged continued work with opponents, and the author said the bill was narrowed from an earlier version that would have waived prior authorization entirely. The committee also heard AB 1979 on artificial intelligence in health care, AB 2161 on Medi-Cal work requirements, AB 539 on extending approved prior authorizations, AB 2311 on physician employment at public hospital districts, AB 1148 on banning phthalates and bisphenols in food packaging, AB 1825 on mental health offender reentry coordination, and AB 2282 on a temporary emergency stabilization unit in Patterson. AB 1979 would preserve licensed clinicians’ professional judgment, bar AI from directing unlicensed clinical functions, and protect medical records used by consumer chatbots; after amendments, several hospital, medical, and industry groups moved from opposition to neutral. AB 2161 would limit the harm of federal Medi-Cal work-reporting rules by using existing data, improving notices, and protecting due process; it drew broad support from patient, provider, and advocacy groups. AB 539 would keep prior authorization approvals valid for up to one year or the course of treatment, with supporters citing continuity of care and opponents warning about utilization, fraud, and cost concerns. AB 2311, as amended, would let certain high-payer-mix or distressed public health care districts directly employ physicians; CMA withdrew opposition after the bill was narrowed, while some hospital interests still objected to the carve-out. AB 1148 would prohibit two chemicals commonly used in food packaging, with supporters citing cancer and endocrine-disruption risks and opponents arguing DTSC should handle the issue through its existing regulatory process. AB 1825 would improve transition planning and Medi-Cal enrollment for offenders with mental health disorders leaving state hospitals, and AB 2282 would authorize a temporary rural emergency stabilization care unit in Patterson until a permanent hospital is built. Several bills were held for later action because the committee lacked a quorum, and the chair repeatedly noted that motions would be taken once enough members returned.

Transcript Highlights:

• and try to gain those efficiencies.
• And what we discovered is that the efficiencies are what we consider to be in the noise, meaning, Efficiencies
• You do have a lot of regulatory changes happening.
• You do have a lot of regulatory changes happening.
• And the last three principles there are things you need to keep in mind, including regulatory efficiency

Summary: The committee met to hear a series of presentations on advanced nuclear economics, workforce, community impacts, and financing. Nucleon Energy’s William Bridge presented a report estimating the economic impacts of hypothetical 200-megawatt and 600-megawatt SMRs, including construction and operating jobs, local spending, tax revenue, and the private-sector conditions needed to attract investment. He said the report used nth-of-a-kind cost assumptions, discussed security and water siting considerations, and argued that early community engagement and permitting work should be timed to when projects are closer to being economic. Committee members questioned cost assumptions, security staffing, transmission and water siting, and whether large reactors or SMRs are more likely to be financed in the near term. Lori Brady of the Nuclear Energy Institute then outlined national nuclear workforce needs and NEI’s strategic workforce planning. She described declining labor-force demographics, the need for hundreds of thousands of new energy workers by 2050, and six workforce priorities: career awareness, pipelines, training and qualification, policy support, retention, and non-traditional pipelines. She highlighted the Nuclear Works career website, the Nuclear Energy Academic Roadmap, the new federal Energy and Natural Resources career cluster, and the Nuclear Uniform Curriculum Program for community colleges. Members asked about AI, robotics, and when training should begin relative to future plant construction; Brady said AI is not expected to replace workers broadly and that training timelines depend on the specific project and staffing plan. Red Wing, Minnesota Mayor Gary Yako described hosting the Prairie Island nuclear generating facility. He said the plant provides a large share of the city’s property tax base, supports well-paid jobs, contributes to local emergency preparedness, and is a strong community partner through donations and employee involvement. He said the city supports relicensing, has regular emergency drills, and has had no issues with dry cask storage. The committee also heard from NEI’s Benton Arnett, who reviewed the current financing landscape, including federal tax credits, DOE loan authority, offtake agreements, and the shift toward project developers and special-purpose vehicles. He said early projects face high first-of-a-kind costs, but federal support and long-term power purchase agreements are helping make projects financeable. Finally, DOE’s Julie Kazeraki described the Office of Energy Dominance Financing and its role in supporting new nuclear, restarts, uprates, and supply chain investments, emphasizing that federal loan and tax-credit tools are intended to reduce upfront risk and improve project affordability.

Transcript Highlights:

• With all these investments we're making at the state level, the other arm, the regulatory arm, is not
• My colleagues covered a few of my points, so I'll try to be as efficient as I can.
• My colleagues covered a few of my points, so I'll try to be as efficient as I can.
• Correct me if I'm wrong, but this bill, in its totality, requires regulatory updates, right?
• . ...significant, the designation comes with no regulatory protection.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee hearing covered several bills related to environmental, natural resources, and maritime issues. Representative Markey testified in support of H. 1000, which would create a commission to study financing wastewater infrastructure, especially in southeastern Massachusetts and the South Shore, citing combined sewer overflows and impacts on aquaculture. Members agreed the core challenge is finding long-term financing for wastewater solutions. The committee also heard testimony on H. 902 to establish an Office of Outdoor Recreation, with supporters describing its role in expanding access, supporting underrepresented communities, and helping grow the outdoor economy. Related testimony also supported H. 986, which would codify the Division of Ecological Restoration and the Office of Fishing and Boating Access within the Department of Fish and Game, with witnesses emphasizing habitat restoration, flood reduction, public access, and boating/fishing opportunities. A major portion of the hearing focused on H. 901/S. 597, “An Act Providing Nature for All,” which would dedicate existing sporting goods sales tax revenue to a new conservation fund. Supporters from Mass Audubon, Environmental League of Massachusetts, Appalachian Mountain Club, Trust for Public Land, Massachusetts Rivers Alliance, and conservation groups argued the bill would provide a sustainable revenue stream for land conservation, parks, trails, wetlands, water protection, and climate resilience, while also advancing environmental justice and outdoor recreation. They said the state needs roughly $300 million more per year to meet land conservation goals and that the bill could generate about $100 million annually without raising taxes. Committee members asked about balancing conservation with housing and development, and witnesses said the goals are compatible and that the bill includes safeguards. Witnesses also noted similar funding models in other states. The hearing also included H. 1053, a bill to create a Merrimack River Collaborative. Regional planning and watershed advocates said the river faces bacterial contamination, heavy metals, combined sewer overflows, and other pollution, and that a formal collaborative would help coordinate municipalities, state agencies, and nonprofits across the watershed and possibly across state lines. Another bill, H. 4109, would relocate harbor lines in New Bedford Harbor to allow reconstruction of deteriorating bulkheads at a waterfront industrial site; the New Bedford Port Authority, engineers, and the property owner said the change is needed for permitting and would support port modernization and jobs. Finally, the committee heard extensive testimony on S. 641 regarding marine pilotage in New Bedford. Supporters argued the bill would remove a District 3 pilotage restriction and improve port flexibility and offshore wind operations, while opponents warned it would undermine the state’s compulsory pilotage system, weaken safety, and allow ship owners to shop for pilots. No votes or final actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Autonomous vehicles in this bill establish a regulatory framework that allows innovation to move forward
• </c> safety standards and regulatory clarity. safety standards and regulatory clarity.
• This creates regulatory vehicles.
• </c> not be viewed as only a regulatory not be viewed as only a regulatory challenge<00:35:37.040><c>
• > workable</c><00:37:28.000><c> for</c> regulatory framework that's workable for regulatory framework

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• I believe I can say that these are top priorities for all of us at the board: water use efficiency standards
• One is through our irrigated lands regulatory program, trying to reduce the unnecessary or excess amount
• Tia Fleming, Executive Director of the California Water Efficiency Partnership, in strong support.
• The way it stitches that is the producers in California, even prior to some of the regulatory burden
• The way it stitches that is the producers in California, even prior to some of the regulatory burden

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• company is seeking a rate of equity or return on equity, they have to go to the Federal Energy Regulatory
• that reliability and the efficiency and the storage capabilities, how much eventually have consumers
• It could dispatch power quickly, affordably, and in an efficient manner.
• Tiffany Fan on behalf of the California Efficiency and Demand Management Council, or SEDMEC.
• Tiffany Fan on behalf of the California Efficiency and Demand Management Council or SEDMEC.

Summary: The Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Resources, Environmental Protection and Energy heard presentations on six budget-related issues and took no votes; all items were held open for a future hearing. The first item concerned funding for the California Transmission Accelerator Revolving Fund under SB 254 and Proposition 4. GoBiz and IBank requested nearly $26 million over five years and 10 limited-term positions to evaluate and finance eligible transmission projects. The LAO said the proposal was broadly consistent with Prop. 4 but noted many implementation details remain unresolved. Senators questioned how the program would lower ratepayer costs, how funds would be protected, and whether the full requested amount was necessary; the administration said the financing strategy is still being developed and that consultants are needed. The committee then discussed trailer bill language to redirect $22 million in General Fund money from the DEPA program to DSGS for summer 2026, and to use roughly $70 million in CalSHAPE interest for ratepayer relief through ELRP or an equivalent program in 2027-28. CEC and CPUC staff said DSGS and ELRP are reliability tools, not PSPS programs, and explained that DSGS had enrolled over 1,000 MW and was expected to have about $52 million available for 2026. Senators and the LAO raised concerns about ending a successful DSGS program, the complexity of transitioning customers to ELRP, and whether CalSHAPE funds should instead continue school HVAC and plumbing projects. Public commenters largely supported extending CalSHAPE and continuing or expanding DSGS rather than shifting funds to ELRP. The subcommittee also heard on petroleum market oversight under SBX1-2 and ABX2-1. The CEC and its Division of Petroleum Market Oversight requested about $1.67 million and a small permanent staffing increase to implement new inventory, resupply, and market analysis duties. Senators pressed the agencies on gasoline price spikes, refinery maintenance, price gouging, and the status of the transportation fuels transition plan, which staff said would be released in draft form soon. Public testimony supported DPMO’s work and called for continued oversight of gasoline pricing. Finally, the CPUC presented three additional budget proposals: resources to implement AB 1207’s changes to the California climate credit, funding for a study of large electrical loads such as data centers under SB 57, and staffing for AB 825’s regional market participation requirements. The LAO said the AB 1207 request may go beyond the statute and urged the Legislature to decide whether it wants a simpler or more complex climate credit redesign. Senators questioned the cost of the work, the need for ongoing staffing, and how ratepayer interests would be protected. The CPUC said the work is needed to adapt to changing load patterns, electrification, data center growth, and potential regional market participation. Public commenters also supported DPMO funding, CalSHAPE, and DSGS, and some urged the Legislature to keep DSGS at the CEC rather than shift funds to ELRP.

Transcript Highlights:

• Second, how do we enhance our logistics efficiencies? Speaking to that, How do we do that?
• How do we partner with the coastal ports to enhance efficiencies into the state of Utah?
• We're also working with Next Terra Energy Resources on an energy efficiency project.
• Making sure we continue to have one of the best regulatory states in the country.
• So because of the efficiency in our program, the expertise that we have,...

Keywords: 985, all

Transcript Highlights:

• it is and how efficient their water usage is.
• Uh, become as efficient as, as they are, for example, um, but what's it gonna take?
• , making our delivery systems more efficient, uh, so that we will not lose.
• Efficiency in In watering for purposes.
• Our members are committed to conservation and efficient efficiency, yet, you know, they deal with sometimes

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, y'all know for the last three years, we have been working to improve our efficiencies, especially
• to them but we have the<00:38:03.119><c> lensure</c><00:38:03.599><c> and</c><00:38:03.839><c> regulatory
• </c> the lensure and regulatory component. the lensure and regulatory component.
• </c> more sense to run child care efficiently more sense to run child care efficiently and<00:38:15.520
• </c> them on all the federal regulatory them on all the federal regulatory changes.<00:38:29.280><c>

Keywords: Appropriations - Room 409, 28 January, 2026; 10:30 A.M., 925, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm the New Mexico representative for the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project.
• oversight... ...throughout the state without any regulatory oversight.
• a payout up front, a relationship that's ongoing that continues to pay the third party, minimal regulatory
• We're talking about energy-efficient stoves, energy-efficient refrigerators, kind of energy-efficient
• Chair, I would also add, you know, developing legislative, regulatory, or administrative recommendations

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• All this bill does is reduces the regulatory burden and allows private industry to do this.
• All this bill does is reduces the regulatory burden and allows private industry to do this.
• from a regulatory standpoint.
• </c> efficiency from a regulatory standpoint. efficiency from a regulatory standpoint.
• </c><00:40:29.599><c> hurdles</c> the regula all the regulatory hurdles the regula all the regulatory

Bills: SF0102, SF0123, SF0021, SF0099

Keywords: energy transmission, load growth, Wyoming energy authority, transmission planning study, public utilities, regional cooperation, energy, funding, grants, loans, coal, natural gas, mineral processing, economic development, stable token, liquidity, trust account, Wyoming, fund distribution, financial regulation

Transcript Highlights:

• ><00:35:34.320><c> of</c> sunset report by the Department of sunset report by the Department of Regulatory
• Agencies to repeal the Regulatory Agencies to repeal the Veterinary<00:35:36.720><c> Pharmaceutical<
• multifamily homes, or hospitals; Voytech Greka of Denver, Colorado, to serve as a building energy efficiency
• <00:40:21.599><c> and</c><00:40:21.760><c> decarbonization</c><00:40:22.560><c> subject</c> efficiency
• and decarbonization subject efficiency and decarbonization subject matter<00:40:23.119><c> expert.

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• to ensure that all our constituent businesses are able to succeed under our regulatory framework.
• The bill, the conference committee before you, lays out, I think, a great roadmap for cannabis regulatory
• This will create better accountability, better transparency, and greater efficiencies in the regulatory
• We also work on some massive regulatory changes to the industry.
• I think some of these regulatory changes have been a long time coming, and they're something that we

Summary: The House opened with ceremonial activities, including the Pledge of Allegiance and recognition of several student athletic teams and guests, then took up a series of routine matters. Members adopted a resolution congratulating the William Diamond Jr. Fife and Drum Corps on its 25th anniversary, suspended Joint Rule 12 for a petition concerning lease authorization for Eastern Mountain State Forests, and enacted several bills, including measures related to the Sandwich town charter and Springfield tax relief. The House also passed a bill authorizing charity alcohol auctions after adopting a substitute amendment, and passed a bill directing the Boston Police Department to waive the maximum age requirement for a specific applicant. The main policy debate centered on Senate Bill 2581, amended and retitled as an act promoting safe technology use and distraction-free education for youth. Supporters described the bill as a response to classroom distraction, bullying, and mental health harms associated with cell phones and social media, and said it would require bell-to-bell restrictions on personal devices in schools, provide guidance and a model policy for districts, and limit social media access for children under 14 while requiring parental consent for 14- and 15-year-olds. Several members cited educator testimony, school district practices, and concerns about anxiety, depression, sleep disruption, and online predators. Opponents and amendment sponsors argued for more local flexibility and warned about implementation costs, but amendments seeking to preserve district-specific policies or prohibit unfunded mandates were rejected. The House adopted a consolidated amendment to the bill by roll call, then passed the bill to be engrossed by a vote of 129-25. Earlier, the House also accepted a conference committee report on legislation modernizing cannabis laws by a vote of 155-0, after debate focused on restructuring the Cannabis Control Commission, expanding licensing and ownership rules, and addressing equity and social justice provisions. The chamber recessed several times, briefly lost quorum during proceedings, and adjourned to meet again in informal session the following day.

Transcript Highlights:

• to ensure that all our constituent businesses are able to succeed under our regulatory framework.
• The bill, the conference committee before you, lays out, I think, a great roadmap for cannabis regulatory
• This will create better accountability, better transparency, and greater efficiencies in the regulatory
• We also work on some massive regulatory changes to the industry.
• I think some of these regulatory changes have been a long time coming, and there's something that we

Keywords: 1212, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We've been working to create efficiencies, and we'll continue to do that. We can do more.
• So we've been updating and, you know, have gone through the Governor's Regulatory Review Council and
• They care about what is efficient.
• Would it be more cost-efficient for the business to just lease it for 80 years instead of purchasing
• Would it be more cost-efficient for the business to just lease it for 80 years instead of purchasing

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 2150, which continues the State Land Department until July 1, 2030. Members questioned the commissioner extensively about agency procedures, backlog, appraisals, auction practices, privilege claims in the Fontamonte audit, and the Coyotes land transaction. The committee also discussed the Griffin amendment, which required quarterly updates, a public hearing on the department’s strategic plan, changes to conceptual land use plans and five-year disposition plans, and legislative findings. After debate over oversight and accountability, the amendment was adopted and HB 2150 was returned with a do pass recommendation by a 6-4 vote. The committee then considered House Bill 2975, which would suspend the State Land Department’s solar scoring map and require new mining and housing resource maps, with the amendment changing the mapping deadline and requiring the maps to be posted online. Supporters said the bill would improve fairness and maximize trust revenue for schools by avoiding favoritism toward solar; opponents argued the solar map is only a guidance tool and that removing it could reduce transparency and revenue. The department said it was neutral but asked for additional staff or consultant support if the bill passed. The committee adopted the amendment and passed HB 2975 as amended on a 6-4 vote. House Bill 2781 followed, addressing solar plant decommissioning, restoration, financial assurance, insurance, and a remediation fund. The amendment narrowed the bill to decommissioning standards and limited its reach to projects receiving permits after the effective date. Testimony focused on the need to ensure solar sites are restored and that taxpayers are not left with cleanup costs; several speakers cited abandoned or aging energy infrastructure as a cautionary example. The committee adopted the amendment and passed HB 2781 as amended by a 6-4 vote. Finally, the committee began House Bill 2267, which would classify certain utility-scale wind or solar projects within four miles of residential property as a public nuisance, with exceptions and grandfathering for existing projects. The sponsor argued the bill responds to concerns about large renewable projects near homes and property value impacts, while the amendment narrowed the scope to utility-scale wind and solar and excluded rooftop solar and existing projects. The transcript cuts off before any final action on HB 2267.

Transcript Highlights:

• by these federal appliance efficiency regulations.
• The Washington State Department of Commerce manages Washington's Appliance Efficiency Program.
• And I think of transmission as energy efficiency.
• And two, A financing mechanism to make the authority an effective and efficient entity.
• Many of our members are focused on efficiency and reliability because their businesses...

Summary: The committee heard public testimony on three bills. SB 5652 would require the University of Washington, Commerce, the King County Department of Public Health, and the Port of Seattle to study and mitigate aviation-related air quality and noise impacts around Sea-Tac, create a work group and grant program, address failed noise insulation “port packages,” and require a state auditor review. The sponsor and supporters from affected cities and community groups described serious health and quality-of-life harms from airport noise and pollution, while the Port of Seattle, Washington Public Ports Association, and AWB opposed the bill, arguing it would impose new mandates, raise cost and governance concerns, and interfere with airport operations. Testimony on the bill was reopened after other business and then closed; no vote was taken. SB 6124 would direct Commerce to study an appliance affordability index that would consider repairability, maintenance, recyclability, performance life, and related factors. The sponsor said the bill is meant to help consumers compare lifetime costs and repair options, drawing on family experience with durable appliances. Consumer and environmental advocates supported the idea as a way to improve transparency and encourage repairable products, while industry groups opposed a state-specific index, warning it would create a patchwork of standards and compliance burdens. The hearing closed after testimony, with no action reported. SB 5466 would create a Washington Electric Transmission Authority, give it powers to support transmission development and, in some cases, acquire property and own or sell transmission projects, and provide a SEPA categorical exemption for certain transmission upgrades with tribal and resource-protection conditions. Supporters from clean energy, labor, utilities, and state agencies said the bill is needed to expand grid capacity, improve reliability, speed clean energy interconnection, and create jobs, though many asked for bonding or financing authority and refinements to the exemption language. Some utilities and business groups supported parts of the bill but opposed state ownership or said the authority should focus more on permitting and coordination; others raised concerns about ratepayer risk and duplication. The hearing closed after extensive testimony, with no vote announced.

Transcript Highlights:

• This is why we're trying to set up a regulatory framework that works.
• This is why we're trying to set up a regulatory framework that works.
• We're confident it can be efficiently implemented.
• The regulatory process is a little more fluid.
• Strict regulatory limits for PFAS in drinking water were finalized last year by the U.S.

Summary: The committee heard SB 404 on metal shredding facilities, SB 601 on water quality protections after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Sackett decision, SB 682 on phasing out PFOS in certain consumer products, and later SB 646 on prenatal vitamins and toxic metal contamination. SB 561 had been pulled from the hearing. In each of the measures, the authors and supporters emphasized environmental and public health protections, while opponents raised concerns about overregulation, implementation, and unintended economic impacts. The committee also spent time on the policy details of each bill, including how smaller operators would be treated under SB 404, how “nexus waters” would be defined under SB 601, and whether alternatives and testing standards were adequate under SB 682 and SB 646. For SB 404, Senator Caballero said the bill would create a permitting and enforcement framework for metal shredding facilities, with operational standards for fire prevention, stormwater, and releases of shredder residue, while supporters argued it would bring needed certainty to a critical recycling industry. Opponents, including small recyclers and community/environmental advocates, said the bill was either too broad or not strong enough, with some warning it would burden smaller facilities and others arguing it would fail to protect overburdened communities. The committee approved SB 404 on a due-pass-as-amended motion to Appropriations, with recorded support from the chair and some members and opposition from others. SB 601 sought to restore state-level protections for waters that lost federal Clean Water Act coverage after Sackett, using a “nexus waters” framework and revised enforcement provisions after amendments removed the private right of action. Supporters said California needed to preserve protections for seasonal streams and wetlands and avoid backsliding, while opponents from business, agriculture, water districts, and local governments argued the definition remained too broad and could create uncertainty, costs, and unintended consequences. The committee also approved SB 601 on a due-pass motion to Appropriations, again with split votes. SB 682, which the committee also advanced, would phase out intentionally added PFOS in six product categories, including cleaning products, cookware, dental floss, ski wax, food packaging, and juvenile products, with an amendment delaying cookware implementation until 2030. Supporters framed it as a source-control measure to reduce PFAS contamination and lower long-term water treatment costs, while manufacturers and cookware interests argued the bill was overbroad, lacked workable testing standards, and could push consumers and businesses toward uncertain alternatives. The committee chair recommended an aye vote, and the measure passed to Appropriations. SB 646 was then introduced on prenatal vitamins, with supporters saying it would require testing and disclosure of heavy metals like lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury, while the opposition said disclosure must be handled carefully so as not to confuse consumers or undermine confidence in prenatal supplements.

Transcript Highlights:

• This is a um almost decadel long reform of regulatory structures for mental health services started back
• This is a um almost decadel long reform<00:03:53.599><c> of</c><00:03:54.000><c> regulatory</c><00:03
• :54.640><c> structures</c><00:03:55.040><c> for</c> reform of regulatory structures for reform of regulatory
• </c><01:12:30.640><c> and</c> I'm the director of regulatory and I'm the director of regulatory and health
• Uh so our the most efficient way we can.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ,<00:15:54.480><c> and</c><00:15:54.639><c> environmental</c> efficiency, and environmental efficiency
• Regulatory certainty and predictability are essential.
• Regulatory certainty and predictability are essential.
• Regulatory certainty and predictability are essential.
• Regulatory certainty and predictability are essential.

Bills: HB61, HB176, SB12

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• process is, current year, but there is still out years and what the regulatory process will be.
• We were able to drop the regulatory provisions. Associated with them.
• We were able to drop the regulatory provision.
• So we'll be able to get the money out the door much more efficiently.
• I would strongly encourage you to try to use technology as efficiently as possible.

Keywords: 988, house, all