Transcript Highlights:

• applicability of facts that runs a foul. applicability of facts that runs a foul.
• And I know that applicable separately.
• Uh and make this statute applicable.
• psychiatric evaluation. psychiatric evaluation.
• As a result, evaluations performed by As a result, evaluations performed by those<02:16:51.679> close

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <01:00:48.720> what residents can actually evaluate what residents can actually evaluate what
• notice must be universal and applicable notice must be universal and applicable to<01:07:59.200>
• Who's going to evaluate<01:08:01.920> that?
• Who's going to be looking evaluate that?
• ,<01:37:28.400> and to approve or deny an applicant, and to approve or deny an applicant,

Keywords: 981, all

Summary: The House convened, established a quorum, approved the corrected journal, and made several announcements, including recognition of Liberty Common High School seniors and Canyon Creek Elementary students visiting the Capitol. Committee meeting notices were also given for Judiciary and Transportation, Housing, and Local Government. The chamber then took up House Joint Resolution 1027, a Holocaust remembrance resolution sponsored by Representatives Weinberg and Woodrow and Senators Weissman and Ball. The resolution emphasized the history of the Holocaust, the rise in anti-Semitic incidents in Colorado and nationally, the importance of Holocaust and genocide education, and the need to combat bias and hate. Several members spoke in support, including personal reflections from Representatives Woodrow, Weinberg, Goldstein, and others about family history, survivor testimony, and the importance of remembrance and prevention. The House adopted HJR 1027 by vote, and Representatives Rutnell and Lindsay were added as co-sponsors. The chamber then set a slate of bills as special orders for April 14, 2026. In committee-of-the-whole action, House Bill 1288 on jury selection was amended and passed; the amended bill creates a jury selection working group to study voir dire, juror questionnaires, and related issues, with a public report and Supreme Court review of any proposed rule changes. House Bill 1224 on financial protections for mobile home park residents was also taken up, with committee reports adopted and discussion focused on transparency in park sales, resident purchase opportunities, disclosures, and due diligence protections. Representative Richardson offered amendment L006 to adjust how a state registration fee is allocated, describing it as a flexibility and transparency measure, while the sponsor responded that the bill was keeping the fee structure stable and that the existing split had been negotiated with stakeholders.

Transcript Highlights:

• The application and enforcement is far too broad for the specificity of the problem.
• The application and justice nor answers.
• The application and enforcement<00:40:19.280> is<00:40:19.599> far<00:40:19.920> too
• Court decisions on how we evaluate Court decisions on how we evaluate application<01:07:50.640><
• <03:19:35.200> and this chapter shall be applicable and this chapter shall be applicable and

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• are being reviewed, priority will be given to applications having the goal of expanding the reach of
• cancer screening efforts in underserved communities. ...that when grant applications are being reviewed
• The bill requires that, to ensure all proposals are appropriate and are evaluated fairly on the basis
• All qualified applicants are to have equal access and opportunity to compete for research funding.
• in place to, I guess,... ...language in your bill, what are the mechanisms in place to, I guess, evaluate

Summary: The committee took up a large health policy agenda. SB 1568 on electronic prescribing was explained as a federal conformity measure, but members raised concerns about preserving patients’ ability to obtain paper prescriptions and about exemptions for emergency, hospice, and other situations. Emergency physicians testified in support of e-prescribing but asked for flexibility, and the bill was reported favorably despite Senator Harrell’s opposition. SB 1606 on patient access to records sought to standardize record-production timelines and require electronic delivery when available; after an amendment correcting a drafting error, the bill drew concerns about HIPAA, behavioral health confidentiality, and the distinction between personal and legal representatives, and it was reported unfavorably as a committee substitute. The committee then approved SB 1346 on fentanyl testing, with a technical amendment, to require hospitals and campus emergency departments to test for fentanyl in urine testing for suspected overdose or poisoning. SB 1224 on administration of controlled substances by paramedics was amended to clarify language and reported favorably. SB 656 on health care billing and collection activities was substantially revised by strike-all amendment to allow sale of medical debt to third parties under new limits, including no interest or fees and return of debt if charity care applies; it was reported favorably as a committee substitute. SB 68 expanded health facilities authority financing to include not-for-profit LLCs and parent companies, and SB 524 added Duchenne muscular dystrophy to the newborn screening panel; both were reported favorably. Later, the committee approved SB 1842 on out-of-network referrals after multiple amendments, requiring providers to verify network participation at the point of service and notify patients in writing, though several members and physicians warned it could burden providers and increase workload. The committee also advanced proposed committee bill SB 7028, which revises the Casey DeSantis Cancer Research Program, adds oversight and reporting requirements, creates a pediatric cancer research incubator, and establishes the Bascom-Palmer VisionGen initiative; cancer center representatives testified in strong support, and the bill was reported favorably as a committee bill. SB 172 on specialty titles and designations was amended to clarify enforcement and was reported favorably after supporters said it would prevent misleading use of specialist titles, while opponents argued it could confuse practitioners’ titles. Finally, SB 1690 on surrendered infants was reported favorably after supporters said it would codify and expand safe-haven baby box procedures and opponents raised safety concerns about the devices. The committee also noted SB 1606 remained pending for reconsideration next week before adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• OCES supports many people with housing searches, completing housing applications, and advocating with
• The single application point is critical, and for many of our seniors that are really willing to go,
• But the single application point is critical, and for many of our seniors that are really willing to
• These evaluation measures can be very discriminatory.
• These evaluation measures can be very discriminatory.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several aging-related bills, with most speakers focusing on housing stability, home-based services, and care transitions. Representative Badger and a commissioner testified in support of H4039, which would create a universal breakfast and lunch program at senior centers funded through a new Senior Breakfast and Lunch Fund, arguing it would reduce food insecurity and social isolation among older adults. Representative Lipper-Garabedian and multiple providers then supported H780/S495, the hospital-to-home partnership program, describing how embedded aging-services liaisons help older patients transition safely from hospitals to home, reduce readmissions, and avoid nursing facility placement; witnesses from Mystic Valley Elder Services and Mass Aging Access cited pilot results, including hundreds of patients served and examples of substantial cost savings and successful discharge planning. The committee also took testimony on S478, which would require continuing care retirement communities to disclose entrance-fee refund policies more clearly at enrollment. Senator Lovely and LeadingAge Massachusetts said the bill would improve transparency for residents and families, while a consumer witness said her family experienced delays and confusion in getting a refund after her mother left a CCRC. Members noted the issue is also being examined by a special commission on CCRCs. A large portion of the hearing focused on S475, a statewide bridge subsidy program for older adults facing housing instability. Advocates from the Massachusetts Coalition for the Homeless, Western Massachusetts, Somerville, Northampton, East Hampton, Old Colony Elder Services, and Somerville’s Office of Housing Stability described rising senior homelessness, long waitlists for subsidized housing, and cases where short-term rental assistance kept older adults housed while they waited for permanent housing. Somerville witnesses said the pilot program helped nine households remain housed and that some participants have since moved into permanent housing. Members asked about wait times, program design, and how to prioritize applicants; witnesses emphasized flexibility, emergency risk, and the need for a statewide expansion. The hearing also included testimony on S465, an ALS bill that would expand home care access regardless of age and bar the use of quality-adjusted life-year metrics in coverage decisions, with the sponsor and ALS Association arguing the measure would reduce discriminatory treatment and better center patient care. No votes were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• We send our information once it is evaluated or discussed to the CDC on what's called the MARIA platform
• It is the Maternal Mortality Review Information Application.
• Why would anybody fill out a free and reduced application if lunches aren't part of it?
• It has to be a provision that comes from a grant application, goes into the system.
• And to qualify, again, applicants must work in a federally designated HPSA.

Summary: The committee first approved the previous meeting minutes and then heard a detailed annual report from Dr. Thomas Arnold, chair of the Maternal Mortality Review Committee, on maternal mortality trends and policy issues. He explained the committee’s review process, confidentiality protections, and national and North Dakota data showing that most maternal deaths are preventable and that mental health conditions, substance use, cardiovascular issues, infection, hemorrhage, and embolism are the leading causes. Members asked about suicide, domestic violence, midwife training, home births, and whether pregnancy testing at death scenes should be expanded; Dr. Arnold said better coroner education, more investigation of unexplained deaths, and possible post-mortem pregnancy testing could improve case identification, especially in rural areas. He also noted that deaths often occur well after 42 days postpartum and that mental health-related deaths remain a major concern. The committee then heard from State Fire Marshal Dr. Matthew Clark on cigarette reduced-ignition-propensity standards and related fire prevention issues. He recommended updating the state’s cigarette propensity law to current national standards and also raised a separate recommendation to require fast-breakaway oxygen tubing for home oxygen users, citing fatal fires linked to smoking around oxygen. Members asked about implementation, cost, insurance coverage, and whether the standards apply in tribal communities; Dr. Clark said he would provide follow-up information and was willing to help with any legislation, but no agency bill had yet been planned. Next, Christine Greff of the Department of Health and Human Services reported on the North Dakota Stroke System of Care. She described the statewide network of stroke-ready hospitals, registry-based quality improvement, and performance data showing continued improvement in stroke recognition, imaging, thrombolytic treatment, transfers, and EMS pre-notification. She highlighted new quality measures for inter-facility transfers and intracerebral hemorrhage care, and said the system remains strong but depends on continued legislative and hospital support. Committee members asked about participation by the VA hospital and were encouraged to consider outreach to include it more fully in the stroke system. Finally, the committee began a presentation on prior authorization and non-opioid pain treatment from Taha Khan of Vertex Pharmaceuticals. He argued that prior authorization can delay access to non-opioid acute pain medications, especially in the 24- to 72-hour post-discharge window when pain is most severe, and said delays can push patients toward opioids. He emphasized that prior authorization has a role in utilization management but should not create barriers in acute pain care, and he noted that current use of the company’s non-opioid product remains very low. The discussion was still underway when the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• From a practical point of view, you know, we are consistently evaluating the infrastructure's ability
• We also use these forecasts to evaluate the reliability of the system at a future point in time, and
• So there are AI applications happening within data centers. We are not doing crypto and AI and...
• Haynes Schrader: ...has government applications.
• Just this past quarter we had 198 applications in one quarter.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Will they have an application that private citizens can go to on their website and fill out to make a
• We have big questions about the applicability, like if it turns into conservation, if there's fallowing
• We're... ...going to have to look at that special method evaluation, especially as, you know, big decisions
• And we went through his whole tax lightning thing with the special method evaluation and tax that, like
• And I hope that you, you know, lead the effort as we look at this special method evaluation, as we look

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I am still awaiting, hopefully relatively imminently, a completed grant application from St.
• He said that is one reason the office exists: to evaluate pilot proposals, try new things, and identify
• pilot proposals evaluate different pilot proposals evaluate<00:15:49.920> uh<00:15:50.040>
• uh try new things and and try evaluate uh try new things and and try to to to identify<00:15:54.279>
• <00:23:45.840> IT audits of Grant applications IT audits of Grant applications IT addresses

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Then lastly, we are taking applications on a near-daily basis from developers around the state.
• Then, lastly, we are taking applications on a near-daily basis from developers around the state.
• Then, lastly, we are taking applications on a near-daily basis from developers around the state.
• Then, lastly, we are taking applications on a near-daily basis from developers around the state.
• Applications are on a near-daily basis from developers around the state.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:09:35.920> or as part of a claims evaluation or as part of a claims evaluation or pursuit
• <00:30:40.080> in demand for timely evaluations in demand for timely evaluations in criminal
• <00:32:49.440> for<00:32:49.679> open qualified applicants for open qualified applicants
• <00:32:55.519> pools Over the past decade, applicant pools Over the past decade, applicant
• grant but also uh limits the application grant but also uh limits the application um<01:25:21.199

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The conference committee met late on Friday evening to discuss the Public Safety and Judiciary budget agreement, beginning with a brief exchange among members about concerns that the executive branch had been delaying the committee’s work by waiting to approve legislative decisions. Members emphasized that the legislature should retain its independence while still allowing normal collaboration with the governor’s office. The committee then moved through several outstanding policy items and adopted them without opposition, including the A38 amendment addressing data-sharing concerns involving disability-related information, a study of firefighting services by the state fire marshal, and an A46 amendment governing access to unredacted portable recording system data in collision investigations, with guardrails on disclosure and use. The committee next reviewed the spreadsheet and budget targets. Fiscal staff explained the judiciary side of the agreement, including funding for court operating costs, a one-time Justice Partner Access Program appropriation, forensic exam rate increases, guardian ad litem funding, public defense, human rights, the competency attainment board, the cannabis expungement board, and fee increases for civil filings and motions. On the public safety side, staff described the target as well as the discretionary items funded, including nonprofit security grants, BCA staffing changes, fire marshal initiatives, a 10-year arson statute of limitations, prosecutor training grants, legal representation for children, E911 funding for critical infrastructure, Philando Castile Training Fund support, corrections-related savings from the Stillwater phased closure and sentence-to-serve elimination, a mandatory minimums task force, a victims of crime account transfer, a decommissioning study, in-service use-of-force training, and extensions of several expiring appropriations. The committee also noted a correction to a spreadsheet label related to the Stillwater closure item. After the spreadsheet walkthrough, the committee took testimony from Chief Justice Natalie Hudson and State Court Administrator Jeff Shorban on behalf of the Minnesota Judicial Branch. Hudson thanked the committee for its work and said the agreement covers some unavoidable costs, including insurance, lease expenses, forensic examiner pay, and the new access system, but argued it does not adequately address the judiciary’s most urgent problem: staffing and judicial compensation. She said court employees are leaving for better-paying jobs, judicial salaries are frozen for two years, and applicant pools for judgeships have declined, especially in greater Minnesota. She also said the judicial branch was not meaningfully consulted on the budget target and urged lawmakers to recognize the courts as a constitutional obligation rather than a discretionary program.

Transcript Highlights:

• So in a nutshell, there are certain disease issues that require in-person evaluations.
• Also, coughing and blindness can be evaluated via videos.
• This means that proper controls, testing, and evaluation must be conducted.
• Given appropriate and thorough evaluation, I think mRNA vaccines hold promise. just as one more tool
• Any vaccine has to be evaluated as a new animal drug. by the FDA, but it is also evaluated for livestock

Bills: SB34, SB119, SB261, SB532, SB1035, SB1245, SB1247, SB1267, SB1442, SB1930, SB1948, SB2078, SB2112, SB2143, SB2155

Keywords: wildfire, wildfire mitigation, wildfire prevention, volunteer fire department, Texas A&M Forest Service, West Texas A&M University, prescribed burning, fuel loading, fuel reduction, firefighting equipment database, emergency communications, disaster preparedness, rural fire protection, asset hardening, natural resource management, emergency management, large wildfire risk, fire grant funding, fire suppression, Texas Legislature

Transcript Highlights:

• Each application for a proposed Blue Ribbon Project is submitted to the applicable local government for
• The current way, so the applicant, when he makes application, he has to turn in.
• The statement must be submitted at the time ...while holding federal office, if applicable.
• abandonment applications is added to this amendment.
• And it hasn't been evaluated. 13.1. I can read it by heart.

Bills: S0036, S0620, S0796, S0934, S1080, S1096, S1366, S1536, S1548, S1580, S1588, S1620, S1756, S7034, S7044

Keywords: nursing title, advanced practice registered nurse, advertising, professional standards, disciplinary action, candidate qualifying, federal office, election integrity, regulatory compliance, political candidacy, veterinary medicine, telehealth, veterinary professional associate, animal health, public safety, access to veterinary services, payment bond exemption, Habitat for Humanity, Florida Forever Act, land acquisition

Summary: The committee first took up SB 354, the “Blue Ribbon Projects” bill, which creates a framework for large planned communities on at least 15,000 contiguous acres with 60% reserved area and a streamlined local review process. Senator McLean presented the bill and a strike-all amendment, and members raised concerns about local control, conservation enforceability, data centers, concurrency, multi-county projects, and whether reserve lands could later be converted. Audubon Florida and 1,000 Friends of Florida opposed the bill, arguing the conservation protections were not permanent enough and that the reserve areas could be changed later; small-county representatives also worried about tax-base impacts. Supporters argued the bill would better manage growth, preserve green space, and provide a more orderly alternative to sprawl. After debate, the committee voted to report the bill favorably. The committee then approved SB 620 on candidate qualifying, which requires candidates for federal, state, county, district, judiciary, school, and school board offices to disclose any non-U.S. citizenship. Amendments added disclosure about whether federal candidates intend to trade stock if elected and adjusted 2026 congressional qualifying procedures in the event of redistricting, including a new qualifying window and petition rules. The bill was reported favorably after brief support from a member of the public and discussion about candidate vetting. The committee also reported favorably CS/CS/CS/SB 1452, a Department of Financial Services bill with amendments addressing My Safe Florida Home notices, condo pilot eligibility, firefighter hiring, unclaimed property, and related financial-services provisions. Next, the committee approved CS/CS/SB 1620, a school board members’ bill of rights. A substitute amendment narrowed the bill to access to records, fiscal transparency, and nondisclosure agreements, while preserving board members’ rights to timely documents, budget information, and public comment, and setting deadlines for records requests. Superintendents and a school board member testified in support, saying the bill clarifies roles and prevents board members from being frozen out. The committee also passed CS/HB 245, which replaces the term “child pornography” with “child sexual abuse material”; one senator supported the terminology change but warned about preserving legal precedent and avoiding appellate issues. The committee then reported favorably SB 1548, an update to the Live Local affordable housing law expanding eligible sites and clarifying setbacks, airport proximity, and fair-housing protections. Finally, the committee took up the veterinary medicine bill creating veterinary professional associates. The bill allows trained master’s-level VPAs to perform limited veterinary services under a veterinarian’s supervision, and an amendment tightened the standard to immediate supervision on premises. Supporters said the measure would expand access to care, especially in rural areas with vet shortages, while opponents argued it added unnecessary regulation. After testimony from veterinary educators and others, the bill continued with support expressed by committee members, including praise for the direct-supervision amendment.

Transcript Highlights:

• into a program evaluation.
• That's the who's evaluating that: in cooperation with the project proposer.
• mindat would be evaluating that project mindat would be evaluating that project everywhere<00:25
• <00:26:20.600> I piece after you've done the evaluation I piece after you've done the evaluation
• discussing mot's funding application discussing mot's funding application with<01:32:54.360>

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• It gives MDVA Maxis access for the purpose of verifying eligibility status of applicants for the benefits
• for the benefits under the applicants for the benefits under the state<00:03:14.680> soldiers
• This law also required that training and competency evaluations were completed annually by all staff
• This law also required that training and competency evaluations were completed annually by all staff
• This law also required that training and competency evaluations were completed annually by all staff

Bills: HF1662, HF2115, HF2159, HF1095, HF2160

Keywords: veterans, veterans affairs, State Soldiers Assistance Program, Veterans Stable Housing Initiative, MAXIS, human services data, data sharing, eligibility verification, informed consent, private data, benefits coordination, veteran housing, veteran assistance, Department of Human Services, Children Youth and Families, state benefits, federal benefits, privacy, public assistance, human services

Transcript Highlights:

• have somebody transported and evaluated have somebody transported and evaluated before<00:25:13.760
• stabilization facilities, and evaluating stabilization facilities, and evaluating the<00:50:45.040
• So, I I would build medical evaluation. So, I I would build on<00:54:23.240> Dr.
• And that these folks would be becoming into their environments to get that evaluation.
• center for evaluation. center for evaluation.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on Senate Bill 3123, which would treat free tuition or school-conditioned enrollment at private educational institutions as a conditional gift rather than a contractual obligation unless otherwise agreed in writing. The Office of the Governor supported the bill, and Kamehameha Schools and the Hawaii Association of Independent Schools strongly backed it, saying it would protect donor intent, preserve school-ohana relationships, and help maintain tuition assistance and educational access for families. A committee member commented favorably on the unity among school organizations, and there were no objections raised before the committee moved on. The committee then took up Senate Bill 2438, which creates a civil cause of action for interference with constitutional and statutory rights through threats, intimidation, or coercion, with private and government enforcement options and protections for constitutionally protected speech. Testifiers from the Community Alliance on Prisons and a know-your-rights educator supported the measure as a civil rights protection grounded in the Hawaii Constitution. No opposition testimony was presented during the hearing, and the measure appeared to receive general support from those who testified. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 3142, which establishes offenses for dangerous and habitual dangerous intoxication and allows civil protective custody and emergency examination in lieu of arrest in certain cases. The Attorney General, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Department of Health, and Department of Human Services supported the bill as a treatment-oriented diversion tool for people who are dangerously intoxicated and at risk to themselves or the public. The Office of the Public Defender opposed the measure, warning it could expand police discretion, burden emergency rooms, and function as a loss of liberty without sufficient treatment resources, while committee members questioned whether the bill would simply cycle people through emergency rooms and back onto the street. No vote or final action was taken in the portion provided; the chair said decision-making would occur at the end of the agenda.

Transcript Highlights:

• This is just of our program evaluations and special reviews, so it's not our performance audits.
• like this with um the program evaluation like this with um the program evaluation SES<00:37:10.359
• and that is the nature of a program evaluation, where it’s not as black and white.
• <01:05:17.160> those maybe originally evaluated those maybe originally evaluated those requirements
• So what we have used for now is not applicable.

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The committee met on February 11 and began with introductions from members and staff, who shared brief personal and district facts. Chair Jim Nash then outlined the committee’s goals for the session, emphasizing bipartisan cooperation, the need to address a looming structural deficit, and the committee’s role in moving legislation forward. The committee also reviewed its rules for the year. The main item was House File 3, authored by Chair Nash and referred to Ways and Means. The bill would require the Office of the Legislative Auditor to produce an annual report tracking whether agencies have implemented prior audit and evaluation recommendations, with the goal of improving internal controls, transparency, and accountability and helping legislators make funding decisions. Nash described the bill as a preventative measure to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse, and said it was modeled in part on practices used in Colorado. Legislative Auditor Judy Randall testified that the office already produces similar update reports but lacks resources to independently verify many agency responses; she said the bill would provide a framework for more regular reporting and discussion, not a “shame tool.” Ranna Lee of Americans for Prosperity testified in support, saying the bill would increase accountability and transparency for how public agencies manage taxpayer resources. A letter from the Minnesota Council on Nonprofits was also noted in support. Representative Clardy offered the A7 amendment to add an appropriation matching the fiscal note; Nash accepted it, saying savings could be found later in the process. The committee approved the A7 amendment by voice vote. During discussion, Representative Quam supported the bill’s focus on accountability, and Representative Freiberg questioned the Legislative Auditor about the office’s expertise on a specific ambulance-services recommendation in the report. Randall responded that the office’s staff are policy research generalists who use standards, best practices, interviews, surveys, and site visits to develop recommendations, and that the goal is to prompt further discussion rather than require blind acceptance. The transcript ends during that exchange, with no final committee vote on House File 3 shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• And so that would send the application to us for screening.
• And so that would send the application to us for screening.
• And that work really starts at application. So on slide 13, That work really starts at application.
• I think that's probably correct in the integrated application screens.
• We accept licensure applications in kind of a siloed methodology.

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• THE DEPLOYMENT OF HYDROKINETIC OF A STRUCTURE AND HYDRO STATION APPLICATIONS HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO INCREASE
• COLLAGEN ENTITY THAT EVALUATES PROGRAMS LIKE THESE LOOKED AT 300 COLLEGES ACROSS THE NATION.
• IN 2023 WE RECEIVED 35 APPLICATIONS.
• LAST YEAR 44 APPLICATIONS FOR 12 SEATS, SIX OF WHICH WERE FROM FLORIDA AND ONE CANDIDATE WAS FROM FLORIDA
• WE DON'T HAVE THE CAPACITY FOR HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF APPLICATIONS.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Well, I think 'as applicable' would be very good on there. All right.
• Like, if there was a re-evaluation, I think that's in our community.
• re-evaluation re-evaluation that<01:02:24.319> I<01:02:24.559> think<01:02:25.000>
• re-evaluation would have been just that. re-evaluation would have been just that. um<01:02:33.280
• cap by the usual procedures applicable cap by the usual procedures applicable to<01:27:41.679>

Keywords: 1191, senate, all