Video & Transcript : 'Minnesota Statutes 474A.02' :

Page 66 of 500
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Military and Veterans Affairs, Space, and Domestic Security Jan 26th, 2026

Military and Veterans Affairs, Space, and Domestic Security

Bills: S1512 , S1602 , S1604 , S1656
Summary: The Committee on Military Veterans Affairs, Space, and Domestic Security met with a quorum and considered several memorials and bills. It first passed Senate Memorial 1714, urging Congress to support the “No Tax Dollars for Terrorist Acts” measure to prevent U.S. funds from benefiting the Taliban in Afghanistan. The committee then favorably reported SB 1512, which expands tax exemptions and procurement flexibility for Space Florida, and SB 1656, which designates the SS American Victory as Florida’s official state flagship in place of the Western Union. The committee also favorably reported SM 1186, which urges Congress to increase the Florida National Guard’s force structure, with supporters citing Florida’s large population and disaster response needs. Senator Sharif voiced support for the effort. Next, the committee took up SB 1602, creating a Homes for Veterans Property Management Incentive Pilot Program in selected counties to help landlords house veterans through vacancy relief and risk mitigation funds; two amendments were adopted, and the bill was reported favorably as committee substitute. SB 1604, which creates the associated trust funds within the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, also received one technical amendment and was reported favorably as committee substitute. Throughout the meeting, several measures drew supportive testimony or comments, including representatives from Space Florida and the Florida Chamber on SB 1512 and a supporter on SB 1602. Multiple members offered to co-sponsor or support veterans-related measures. No bills were opposed in debate, all amendments were adopted without objection, and each item was reported favorably before the committee adjourned.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Senate Standing Committee on State and Local Government (3-18-26)

State & Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:02:09.520><c> So,</c><00:02:10.080><c> uh,</c><00:02:10.239><c> the</c><00:02:10.399><c> first
  • So, uh, the first item we're<00:02:11.200><c> going</c><00:02:11.280><c> to</c><00:02:11.360><c> hear
  • </c><00:02:11.520><c> is</c><00:02:11.760><c> House</c><00:02:12.000><c> Bill</c><00:02:12.319><c> 456
  • ><c> by</c><00:02:14.160><c> Representative</c><00:02:14.640><c> Freeland.
  • <00:04:33.680><c> in</c><00:04:33.919><c> 1942</c> statute in 1942 statute in 1942 and<00:04:35.759><
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Standing Committee on Health Services (3-5-26)

Health Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:02:45.760><c> This</c><00:02:46.000><c> bill</c><00:02:46.319><c> directs</c><00:02:46.720><c
  • </c><00:02:50.720><c> and</c><00:02:51.040><c> upon</c><00:02:51.519><c> approval</c><00:02:52.239><c
  • for<00:02:58.319><c> that</c><00:02:58.560><c> calendar</c><00:02:58.959><c> year.
  • problematic</c><01:02:52.559><c> because</c><01:02:52.880><c> what</c><01:02:53.280><c> we</c><01:02:
  • </c><01:02:59.200><c> not</c><01:02:59.440><c> sort</c><01:02:59.599><c> of</c><01:02:59.680><c> picking
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Legislative Session Day 21 (2-5-26)

Kentucky House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:02:01.439><c> by</c><00:02:01.680><c> the</c><00:02:01.840><c> power</c><00:02:02.079><c> of</c><
  • 00:02:02.159><c> the</c><00:02:02.320><c> Holy</c><00:02:02.640><c> Spirit.
  • In Jesus<00:02:04.159><c> name</c><00:02:04.399><c> we</c><00:02:04.640><c> pray.
  • &gt;&gt; Mr.<01:02:30.000><c> Speaker,</c><01:02:30.319><c> I</c><01:02:30.559><c> move</c><01:02:30.799
  • </c><01:02:34.640><c> Speaker,</c><01:02:35.040><c> could</c><01:02:35.200><c> you</c><01:02:35.359><
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:02:09.920><c> where</c><00:02:10.239><c> we</c><00:02:10.399><c> have</c><00:02:10.560><c> a<
  • We are<00:02:15.520><c> providing</c><00:02:15.840><c> these</c><00:02:16.080><c> services</c><00:02:
  • :02:20.879><c> or</c><00:02:21.120><c> a</c><00:02:21.280><c> new</c><00:02:21.440><c> system</c><00:
  • :02:22.160><c> that</c><00:02:22.480><c> we're</c><00:02:22.720><c> going</c><00:02:22.800><c> to</c>
  • We were going<00:02:43.599><c> to</c><00:02:43.680><c> go</c><00:02:43.840><c> over</c><00:02:44.319>
Summary: The subcommittee heard a budget overview from the Kentucky Court of Justice focused on mandated services and several growth items in the judicial branch budget. Court officials said the requests were driven by legal and contractual obligations, including higher contractor rates for court interpreters and IT support, annual software-as-a-service costs, and upgrades to the court’s audiovisual record system (JAVS). They also discussed local facilities needs tied to Jefferson County lease space and the Boyle County Courthouse, though the bulk of the presentation centered on the court’s technology and service-delivery costs. Members asked detailed questions about interpreter services, including whether services are provided in person, by phone, or by Zoom, and whether Kentucky could train and certify more local interpreters instead of relying on contractors from around the country. Court officials said the certification process is rigorous, that the branch is working with the National Center for State Courts on an apprenticeship program, and that they believe Kentucky may have flexibility to develop state-level certification if it meets court needs. They also said they are exploring technology and AI tools for translation, but have not found a solution that reliably handles complex courtroom context. Representative Sharp asked whether cases had been delayed for lack of interpreters; officials said they could provide aggregated data later. The court also described its major IT modernization effort, including a statewide case management system, e-filing, and maintenance of many legacy applications. Officials said contractor rates need to be raised to compete for skilled labor during the implementation phase, but that those costs should decline once the new systems are fully built and only maintained. They explained that part of the request covers three SaaS initiatives: ongoing subscription costs for existing systems, annual fees for the CaseWorks system used in pretrial and specialty courts after federal grant funding ends, and adoption of DocuSign to streamline invoicing, procurement, and contract execution. In response to questions from Representative KC Carney, they said cybersecurity is taken seriously, that they recently conducted a tabletop exercise, and that some risk shifts to cloud vendors under contract, though no separate cybersecurity line item was included. A substantial portion of the discussion focused on the JAVS audiovisual court-record system. Court officials said not all courtrooms are on the same version, and they want funding to bring all locations up to the current version and prepare for version 9, which they said would standardize the system statewide and support the official court record. When asked about costs, they said each upgrade can cost about $70,000 to $80,000 per system, that they aim to upgrade about 50 per year, and that the request reflects the need to keep pace with a four-year refresh cycle. No votes or formal actions were taken during the meeting.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • :12.200><c> representative</c><00:02:12.720><c> Bray</c><00:02:13.760><c> I</c><00:02:14.760><c> representative
  • :02:19.599><c> represent</c><00:02:20.120><c> de</c><00:02:20.760><c> yes</c><00:02:21.760><c> represent
  • Fleming yes<00:02:25.040><c> represent</c><00:02:25.680><c> Freeland</c><00:02:26.959><c> yes</c><00
  • Hart<00:02:37.000><c> representative</c><00:02:37.519><c> Lockett</c><00:02:38.640><c> I</c> Hart representative
  • 00:02:43.159><c> Riley</c><00:02:44.560><c> yes</c><00:02:45.560><c> representative</c> Senate Bill 244
Summary: The House Appropriations and Revenue Committee met on March 13, 2025, with a quorum present and took up several Senate bills. Senate Bill 244, relating to Department of Law operations, was presented as a cleanup bill and reported favorably with 18 yes votes and no opposition. Senate Bill 19, concerning moments of silence and reflection, was amended with PHS 1 to add a moral instruction component and related school-district provisions; members raised questions about the research cited, the logistics of student release time, and possible fiscal effects. The bill was reported favorably with 15 yes, 3 no, and 1 pass, and a title amendment was adopted. Senate Bill 63, dealing with street-legal special purpose vehicles, was amended to make local participation optional, clarify motorcycle-style insurance requirements, and address registration and inspection rules; after a committee amendment was rolled into the substitute, it was reported favorably with 18 yes and 1 pass. The committee also considered Senate Bill 179, which establishes a nuclear energy development grant program within the Kentucky Nuclear Energy Development Authority. Testimony explained that the bill sets aside $10 million from an existing appropriation, including $2 million for workforce training at the University of Kentucky’s engineering school in Paducah. The bill was reported favorably with 19 yes votes and no opposition. Senate Bill 25, a housing measure allowing industrial revenue bonds for large multifamily housing, was substantially expanded through PHS 2 and a committee amendment to incorporate provisions from House Bill 9, House Bill 643, Senate Bill 85, and budget-related language; the committee reported it favorably with 16 yes votes and 3 passes, and adopted a title amendment. Finally, Senate Bill 6, which revises education reporting and funding provisions, was amended by PHS 1 to require reporting of fringe costs in K-12 spending and to modify SEEK funding for virtual schools and English as a Second Language add-ons. Members asked whether the changes affected other funding streams and how the SEEK formula would be applied, and the sponsor clarified that the virtual-school provision applies only to SEEK. The bill was reported favorably with 16 yes votes and 3 passes.