Video & Transcript : 'operational costs' :

Page 65 of 500
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • We also operate distribution centers in Texas, Tennessee, and Georgia.
  • You can imagine that takes incremental cost.
  • Apart from the cost of lost merchandise, this also results in additional cost on us, shipment delays
  • Cargo theft also disrupts how we operate our business.
  • So obviously, all of these costs add up to the supply chain.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation convened to consider the promotion of Coast Guard Lieutenant Samuel Hafensteiner to Lieutenant Commander and the nomination of Stephen Bradbury as Deputy Secretary of Transportation. The meeting highlighted ongoing concerns regarding aviation safety, especially in light of recent aircraft incidents. Members discussed the critical need for knowledgeable leadership within the Department of Transportation to address these safety challenges effectively. Mr. Bradbury's background as a former General Counsel of the Department was presented as a strong asset for the role he seeks.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 9th, 2026

House Appropriations & Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • plus the current cost were a total cost of $2.4.6 million, and then because we have to figure out your
  • new costs are this.
  • The increased operational costs to Torrance County would be approximately $2.5 million annually.
  • The increased operational costs to Torrance County would be approximately $2.5 million annually.
  • We do have a sheet with your operating costs and your bond revenue. Good morning or good afternoon.
Bills: HB63 , HB64 , HB184 , HB200 , HB47 , HB48 , HB2 , HB9
Summary: The committee heard testimony on the expected impacts of House Bill 9 on private detention facilities and the surrounding counties and municipalities, focusing on Cibola County/Milan, Torrance County/Estancia, and Otero County. Corrections Secretary Alicia Lucero explained that the Corrections Department does not oversee the immigration detention facilities directly, but said the department could help displaced workers through hiring fairs and expedited hiring into state positions, and suggested possible alternative uses for the buildings such as behavioral health treatment, training campuses, or transitional living centers. She also noted that a memorial would task several state agencies and affected counties with exploring alternate uses and economic options, and that Workforce Solutions had scheduled job fairs in February for the affected communities. Local officials described major fiscal and community impacts. Cibola County and Milan said the loss of the facility would reduce gross receipts tax revenue, force service cuts, and potentially shrink the county budget substantially; they also warned that the village uses the detention population to support federal grant applications and industrial park development. Torrance County and Estancia said the closure would eliminate jobs, reduce GRT revenue that funds public safety, and require transporting prisoners to other facilities at much higher bed rates, with estimated annual impacts around $3 million. Otero County reported 284 jobs and $20.8 million in payroll at risk, along with about $3 million in annual GRT and a $68 million facility that could be foreclosed if bonds defaulted. Committee members pressed for more precise numbers, including employee counts, transport costs, current bed costs, and the total fiscal impact after accounting for existing contract payments. Several members emphasized that each facility and community is different and asked for separate, detailed plans, including short-term cost replacement and long-term economic diversification. There was discussion of possible hold-harmless assistance, emergency bill drafting, and coordination with Workforce Solutions, Economic Development, and higher education partners. No formal vote was taken; the chair directed staff and agencies to meet the next morning to continue developing an emergency response and requested more detailed information from the counties and the department.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Local Government Jan 20th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's also about adding costs to build.
  • It's also about adding costs to build.
  • of the dirt out of the cost of housing.
  • This operates as a regressive cost on working families and first-time homebuyers when we talk about mitigation
  • When we talk about the cost of housing, nobody ever talks about the health and ecological costs of housing
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several local government bills. HB 2006 would extend the deadline for certain rural counties that collect a sales and use tax for economic development to designate industrial land banks under the Growth Management Act. Supporters, including the sponsor and Kittitas County representatives, said the bill would help counties identify industrial land for job growth and economic development; Futurewise opposed it, citing concerns about large industrial land banks and impacts to agricultural lands. HB 2244 would let a city that forms a fire protection district after July 1, 2026, keep its levy rate without reducing it by the district’s levy, and would also allow online notice and interlocal contracting for fire services. City and fire officials supported it as a practical tool to fund fire service, while one witness opposed the broader trend of appointed taxing authorities. The committee also heard extensive testimony on HB 2316, which would limit shrub-step vegetation inside urban growth areas from being treated as wildlife habitat, critical area, or conservation area, and would bar related mitigation or replacement requirements. Tri-Cities officials, builders, housing advocates, and the sponsor argued the bill would reduce delays and costs for housing and development on already designated urban land, while conservation groups, tribal representatives, and some individuals opposed it as a broad rollback of habitat protections and a harmful precedent for ecosystems and wildlife. No vote was taken on the bills during the hearing. HB 2103 would expand public utility contracting authority so cities, utilities, and joint operating agencies could enter “capability” contracts for renewable or non-emitting generation projects, including nuclear, renewable hydrogen, and fusion, and repeal certain price-limit restrictions. Supporters said it would align older contracting law with the Clean Energy Transformation Act and help utilities plan for future power needs; opponents warned it would shift risk to ratepayers and revive concerns tied to the WPPSS nuclear debacle. The committee also heard HB 2388, which would classify pivot-corner solar and agrovoltaic facilities on agricultural land as distributed energy resources and accessory uses; the sponsor and supporters said it would help meet energy needs without harming productive farmland, while Futurewise asked for clarification to avoid unintended loss of agricultural land. The hearing then returned to HB 2103 for additional testimony, with the same basic split between utility and clean-energy supporters and ratepayer or anti-nuclear opponents.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • to support state operations costs for the Every Woman Counts program.
  • to support state operations costs for the Every Woman Counts program.
  • County contract for updated indirect costs, employee benefits and rates, personnel costs, and lease costs
  • system costs.
  • system costs.
Summary: The committee first heard May Revision child care and human services items. The Department of Child Support Services described two technical adjustments, which the analyst supported. The Department of Social Services then walked through child care proposals, including a reduction in federal and Proposition 64 funding absorbed through a shift from General Child Care to the Alternative Payment program, a 2.01% child care COLA, disaster-related infrastructure grants, a new administrative support cost structure for Alternative Payment agencies, the removal of prospective pay funding after a federal rule change, a reappropriation for existing infrastructure grants, and estimates of unspent child care funds. The Legislative Analyst’s Office recommended asking for more justification for shifting reductions to CAP, supported the COLA reduction but wanted consistency across programs, recommended removing prospective pay funding, opposed the administrative cost shift, and suggested further review of disaster grant alignment. Members pressed the administration on why more slots would be cut for the same savings, why the COLA was reduced, and whether the administrative percentage would grow over time. The administration said the changes were intended to avoid disrupting currently enrolled families, reflect point-in-time relinquishments and unspent funds, and stabilize contractor operations. Public commenters, including providers, advocates, and county representatives, urged full COLA funding, rejection of child care slot reductions, preservation of prospective pay, and continued investment in child care infrastructure and access. The subcommittee then recessed before moving to health items. In Part B, the Department of State Hospitals presented its May Revision proposals, including a central utility plant replacement project at Metropolitan State Hospital, funding for a continuum electronic health record system, reduced county bed billing authority to reflect phase-in of additional LPS beds, limited contract exemption authority for online clinical subscription services, reversion of prior-year unspent operating funds, and a workforce development proposal to use Behavioral Health Services Act funds instead of General Fund for training programs. The department said the EHR would modernize records and improve continuity of care, and that the contract exemption would prevent delays in essential clinical information services. No votes were taken in the excerpt provided.
OR
Transcript Highlights:
  • Internal auditors are closer to the action of the operations and so we may have a greater expertise in
  • Two reports were substantiated and resulted in questioned costs.
  • How much does it cost?
  • We think it's costing more money than it should.
  • Is that a, is the hotline also for that, or just... ...it's costing more money than it should.
Summary: The Joint Interim Committee on Legislative Audits met on June 17 for informational presentations. The Department of Administrative Services, through Chief Audit Executive Eli Ritchie, gave an overview of statewide internal audit requirements and the fiscal year 2025 report. He explained the difference between internal and external audit, described Oregon’s statutory and rule-based internal audit structure, and reported that 30 agencies had internal audit functions, with most meeting required standards. He said 73 audits and 49 advisory/consulting engagements were completed statewide, with strong compliance overall, though a few agencies were rebuilding audit committees after vacancies. No committee questions were raised after the presentation. The Secretary of State’s Audits Division then presented its Government Waste Hotline annual report. Director Steve Bergman and audit manager Olivia Rekhed described changes made to align the hotline with statute, including renaming it the Government Waste Hotline, creating a review panel, improving anonymity protections, removing fraud reporting from the hotline’s scope, and adjusting reporting timelines. They said hotline volume increased modestly in 2025, most reports were referred elsewhere or closed for insufficient evidence, and two reports were substantiated, including questioned costs of about $856 for personal use of a state vehicle and about $2.9 million tied to the Preschool Promise program. Committee members asked about hotline staffing, cost, anonymity, and follow-up on findings; staff said the hotline is lightly resourced, uses a contracted intake service, and referrals or recommendations are followed up through management letters and later reviews. The committee also heard an audit of the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department’s safety inspections and asset tracking. The Secretary of State’s office reported that OPRD had not consistently conducted or documented quarterly OSHA safety inspections and had incomplete asset records, including missing acquisition dates and costs for many assets. The audit made eight recommendations covering safety inspection policies, asset management guidance, tagging, reconciliations, disposition controls, training, and a new asset management system; OPRD agreed to all recommendations. OPRD officials said they had already begun training staff, improving inspection procedures, and working toward a replacement asset system, while noting operational challenges from a large, dispersed park system and manual processes. Committee members asked about what kinds of assets are tracked, how tagging works, whether items were actually being lost, and how much tracking is necessary for low-value tools; OPRD said the main issue was inconsistent classification and documentation rather than widespread loss. The meeting ended with no votes or formal actions taken.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • I've owned and operated the Oasis for 11 years.
  • about the high costs of staffing and whether the demand and the...
  • It is really the cost of doing business in California.
  • Again, it recognized that most operators are good operators that want to comply and that you can have
  • We can't do that if folks are operating outside of these regulations.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Energy, Utilities, Environment and Climate - 04/08/26

Energy, Utilities, Environment, and Climate

Transcript Highlights:
  • costs.
  • costs.
  • costs.
  • Uh I financing cost, construction cost.
  • We cost cost analysis for the lifetime.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Vets Committee Meeting - 2025-03-26

Veterans and Military Affairs Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • One of the biggest costs for our soldiers and airmen occurs when they go to school, which costs the federal
  • So we're requesting resources to both meet operating costs while working toward the goal of achieving
  • To address the operating cost increases in the health care division, general fund requests include $7.93
  • We need to address the operating cost increase in that division.
  • This will help cover the expected growth in compensation and benefits and other operating costs, including
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Health and Human Services - 04/09/25

Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that's why it would have a cost.
  • It does not have an MA cost.
  • Funding the operating reductions.
  • </c> some of these costs is the facility fee. some of these costs is the facility fee.
  • This provision would cost fees.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Day 11 (1-21-26)

Kentucky Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> that kind of spirit in health care costs that kind of spirit in health care costs because<00:23:
  • </c> about how managed care operates. about how managed care operates.
  • </c> costs, but it doesn't. costs, but it doesn't.
  • </c> costing us? costing us? &gt;&gt; Senator<00:30:27.039><c> from</c><00:30:27.200><c> Grayson.
  • </c> to operate at the top of their training. to operate at the top of their training.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Local and County Government Feb 3rd, 2026

Local and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • That's why we have people that are operating now in their homes.
  • This will also reduce administrative mailing costs and cover the cost to taxpayers and administrative
  • I think the costs are going to vary.
  • What are the costs that the assessor's office would be accruing?”
  • It didn't cost me anything. So what kind of cost specifically did they need to be funded for?”
Bills: SB1519 , SB1775 , SB1900 , SB1948 , SB2080
Summary: The Senate Local and County Government Committee considered several bills dealing with municipal regulation, penalties, incentives, fireworks, and tax increment financing. Senate Bill 1519 would allow low-impact home-based businesses to operate without additional municipal permitting or zoning restrictions, while still requiring compliance with state and federal laws and applicable professional boards. Members questioned how the bill would define “no-impact” businesses, how it would affect short-term rentals and home-based services like nail salons or dispensaries, and whether it reduced local oversight. The bill passed 7-2. Senate Bill 1775 clarified that municipalities may impose penalties for traffic-, alcohol-, and drug-related offenses that are less than or equal to the state statutory penalty, and set caps for other municipal fines. After extended questioning over whether the bill lowered or matched state penalties, a legislative analyst was brought in to explain that the measure was intended to resolve confusion about municipal authority. The bill passed 10-0. Senate Bill 1900 would direct 5% of the value of state economic development incentives to cities or counties for infrastructure, with members raising concerns about how the funds would be split, whether counties or cities would control them, and how the bill would apply in unincorporated areas. The author said he was open to revising the language, and the bill passed 11-0. Senate Bill 1948 would expand the time frame for licensed fireworks sellers to sell consumer fireworks year-round and would also bar counties from prohibiting private outdoor consumer fireworks displays, subject to burn bans and other safety limits. Questions focused on safety, county zoning, and whether the bill relied on an outdated building code reference. The bill passed 8-2. Senate Bill 2080, a request bill from county assessors, would require assessors to be included as an information resource in TIF/TID processes, align district boundaries with parcel lines, and allow administrative fees to cover assessor costs. Members debated the justification and size of the fee and whether it would burden local governments, but the bill passed 8-2.
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Tuesday, January 20, 2026)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Speaker, I rise today to address the issue of rising health care costs.
  • Speaker, I rise today to address the issue of rising health care costs.
  • Speaker, I rise today to address the issue of rising health care costs.
  • Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used to streamline operations, reduce costs, and boost
  • We've seen trade wars that make the cost of everything go up.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Budget Feb 9th, 2026 at 08:30 am

Capital Budget

Transcript Highlights:
  • costs.
  • costs.
  • Try not to sell valuable assets in order to cover your operating costs.
  • costs.
  • By shifting capital assets, liquidating capital assets to cover operating costs, we are essentially selling
Bills: HB2236 , HB2281 , HB2514 , HB2551 , HB2668
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Corrections and Public Institutions Apr 8th, 2026

Corrections and Public Institutions

Transcript Highlights:
  • This fee that we're discussing today is not a new cost.
  • Raising this surcharge to $20 will not cause court costs to become disproportionate to court costs in
  • We're losing cattle operations every day.
  • It's cost of doing business, right?
  • If my labor costs more, my land costs more, my inputs cost more, how am I going, and I raise a better
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Rising special education costs, some increases in non-personnel costs like insurance and utilities, and
  • for the cost borne by schools.
  • cost of this would be.
  • it cost to run it.
  • The increase of the discretionary block grant will help districts weather rising operational costs, especially
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 23rd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • And if that food truck operator wants to expand into even more communities, obviously, those costs stack
  • Some cities are outright hostile towards food truck operators.
  • These states have food trucks operate under a single reciprocal permit.
  • This single annual processing will properly refresh the overall cost.
  • This is what drives up ratepayer costs.
Committee: House State Affairs
NM
Transcript Highlights:
  • As we see labor costs increasing, along with equipment costs, I want to caution that we have our federal
  • We asked schools to operate in order to...
  • What we were tracking is trends in overall program costs and trying to look at where the overall costs
  • The cost of beef in particular is going up, and if the rate is set now yet the actual cost goes up, are
  • The cost of the program does change the cost for the schools, right?
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • Do this in 2025 with $191 million annual operating budget and a $276 million capital program.
  • Over half of our skilled operators are expected to retire within the next decade.
  • And as the witnesses today know better than most, ratepayers will bear the brunt of those costs. costs
  • investments first, and similarly the cost of getting all the lead out is extraordinary.
  • You know, we've seen a lot of operators aging out. Those are one and two man operations.
Summary: The meeting primarily focused on discussions surrounding the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) and its implications for local water systems. Various witnesses highlighted the transformative impact of the bipartisan infrastructure law, which has provided an unprecedented amount of funding to help address long-standing issues in drinking water infrastructure, particularly concerning lead service line replacements and sustainability in water management. The discussions emphasized the urgent need for federal reauthorization to continue supporting these initiatives, as many rural and disadvantaged communities still face substantial barriers in upgrading their water systems. Additionally, cybersecurity risks were noted, raising concerns over the vulnerability of water systems across the nation.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Transportation Committee Apr 6th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • They operate on our streets, to companies like Waymo and Cruise LLC.
  • I will just say, however, we represent bus operators and school bus operators, and have concerns from
  • Is there an estimate on what the cost savings would be per gallon?
  • The installation cost... The installation costs, in addition to the kit, well under $1,000.
  • The data confirms what we are seeing in the operating room.
Summary: The Assembly Transportation Committee met as a subcommittee until quorum was established, then heard several transportation-related bills. AB 1614 would extend existing anti-piggybacking rules to Class 1 bikeways, prohibiting multiple riders on a single bike or e-bike; supporters emphasized rising e-bike injuries and trauma cases, while People for Bikes argued it could create unnecessary barriers and enforcement issues. The committee also heard AB 2193, which would make autonomous vehicle manufacturers responsible for traffic citations when no human driver is present; Teamsters and transit labor supported the bill as an accountability measure, and there was no formal opposition on file. AB 2629 would cap fees charged by DMV business partners for online vehicle registration services at 5% above DMV fees. The sponsor and consumer advocates said the bill would curb spoofed websites and hidden upcharges, while DMV business partners and related companies argued the cap would make the program economically unworkable and reduce service options. Members questioned how the 5% figure was chosen, and the bill advanced on a due pass recommendation to Appropriations after a roll call. The committee also heard AB 2046, which would allow EPA-approved E85 conversion kits in California to expand access to lower-cost, lower-carbon fuel; supporters cited consumer savings and emissions reductions, and the bill passed to Appropriations. Finally, AB 2346 proposed broader e-bike safety rules, including speedometers, lighting, age-based speed limits, local authority to set path limits, and consumer disclosures; supporters framed it as a response to serious injuries and illegal e-motos, while opponents raised concerns about overbreadth, enforcement, and potential profiling. The committee approved AB 2346, sending it to Judiciary, and later completed roll calls showing the consent calendar and the other heard bills advancing out of committee.